We stand by you France, I come from the US. I will stand with you and die with you! At no cost. Just tears.

@tikou8377

7 ай бұрын

Nous sommes liés par l'histoire et la guerre, votre liberté, c'est notre liberté, amitié éternelle entre les Etats-unis et la France!

@michaeltriptow6877

7 ай бұрын

We indeed are linked by history and war. Your freedom gave us our freedom and in return we are now partners@@tikou8377

@goldorakrak8939

5 ай бұрын

@@tikou8377 Quelle naïveté !! C'est à pleurer...

@tikou8377

5 ай бұрын

​@@goldorakrak8939 c'est toi le naïf. Les USA, et la Grande-Bretagne sont les seuls pays qui ne nous déclareront plus jamais la guerre. Si tu es incapable de voir ça, c'est que ton manque de connaissance géopolitique est colossal.

@FerNando-ys5hc

3 ай бұрын

J'emmerde ces trolls si je les vois, je les déchirerai

America's oldest ally we stand with France 🇫🇷.. 🇺🇲

@BuFuMAV4ICK

4 күн бұрын

You literally pulled out of the "Paris" agreement..... You stood by untill it wasn't in your interest...

La France forte, La France libre, ! Vive La France !, toujours....

*Jai Hind and Long Live India France Relationship especially under Defense and Aerospace Sector*

I'm french, and even saw the CDG leaving Toulon on a way back from a trip in Corsica, a few days ago. Yet I had no idea it got revamped like that. Cheers from France though, usually american/brit comment are trolls based on WWII, here, well much more constructive. See ya mates.

@616CC

Ай бұрын

French people that leave France are often pompous snobs just a stereotype though I lived at uni with a Frenchman one of the most down to earth guys I’d met 🇬🇧 🇫🇷

The Charles de Gaul is most definitely NOT new. She’s over 22 years old.

@tauron1

Ай бұрын

Exactly and it's hardly gigantic. It's much smaller than any US flattop and it smaller than the 2 UK carriers. It is also older than 22 years. It was commissioned 23 years ago, however was laid down in 1989 and launched in 1994. It took almost 8 full years after first launch to commission after redesigns, flaw fixes etc and it still faces numerous extensive maintenance lay ups, without a sister ship to take on it's duties. The Foch and Clemenceau by comparison were commissioned in half the time of CDG and at least then France was able to deploy an AC all the time.

@twsdws7385

2 күн бұрын

Compared to some like us Nimitz it s quite new

In accordance with France's national status, at least two of these aircraft carriers must be built. Long live France.

Glad to hear it love from America

I find it odd that the video footage is of Super Hornets & USN carriers. Isn't there any footage of the Charles De Gaulle & Rafale M's that they could use?

The French have maintained ICBM's in missle subs for some time now however it is unlikely that they will put those type of missiles on their new aircraft carrier. Ski jump style carriers place weight limits on aircraft launching from their deck. This means that combat aircraft will not be able to launch with maximum weapons on board so I think that the French will go with the electro-magnetic catapult system.

@brunol-p_g8800

3 ай бұрын

French carriers don’t have ICBMs, but their air wings operate the ASMPA, the French nuclear cruise missile.

La France est toujours la grande nation. Amour de l'Angleterre.

Ski ramps look ridiculous, and it limits the types of aircraft and weapons loads.

@doctorserpiente1991

Жыл бұрын

Exactly

@Then.72

Жыл бұрын

Looks aren’t for show in warfare

Thales should be pronounced "Talés". The name of this company is a reference to Thalès, an ancient Greek pre-Socratic philosopher.

Hoping she gets named after one of the never built Alsace class Battleships.

The AUKUS pact just pissed off the French. Hope it does not hurt military cooperation

@jeremymonin8343

3 ай бұрын

Enjoy your Aukus! We don't trust you guys and we will vote for that

@johndoe-cd9vt

2 ай бұрын

don't worry they made a huge rafale + submarine deal with India just after that ... France is now the 2nd weapon supplier in the world.

Good to know that the world is ready to BLOW ITSELF TO PIECES!! Easier to train somebody to destroy than to heal and build.

@totomorenodosal

4 ай бұрын

with putin around, there is no other way to go.

The ski jump is a really bad idea

It’s coming every country needs to do there best

We love the French they are extremely good at warfare they are every bit as good as any army in the world FACT

@BuFuMAV4ICK

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, thanks for that contribution to WW2.....

@BuFuMAV4ICK

Жыл бұрын

Just thinking, even at the height of the French Napoleon empire, didn't you, even when you teamed up with the Spanish, get completely destroyed by the British...

@alanbstard4

11 ай бұрын

lol

@ejmproductions8198

11 ай бұрын

@@BuFuMAV4ICK You also lost the battle of France. Surrendered 120,000 troops to the Japanese in Singapore in one week while outnumbering them 3-1. And don't flatter yourself - you only contributed 6% of the allied manpower. The Russians killed 7/8 Germans and the Yanks took care of the war in the Pacific

@ejmproductions8198

11 ай бұрын

@@BuFuMAV4ICK Napoleon lost at Waterloo - there were only 20% Brits present and only 5% were English. Not really a British victory

I don't know if these massive platforms on the sea can detour hypersonic weapons that we have developed in today's warfare I think it's almost at the end of their useful life

"The French have also stated they may not use catapults at all" In fact this is totally out of the question. The PANG will host "only" 30 to 40 fighter jets because they will be in company of pilotless fighters / drones.

“manned by 2,000 personnel from the Navy.” Umm….yeah….they’re called “sailors”. That’s kind of what they do. What’s next? Tanks manned by personnel from the Army?

Nuclear propulsion is not the same as nuclear weapons so doesn't necessarily mean nuclear war.

Did he actually say that Russia is a super power ? 😅

@deuxalex562

11 ай бұрын

well, with over 3000 nuclear weapons, yes it is, unfortunately.

@nicklasmelander8467

10 ай бұрын

@@deuxalex562 You think they are the only one? Nuclear weapons are 80+ year old technology they don't make you a super power. Any developed country can build the same if they want.

Hope Germany gets one and the EU buys 2. But Germany and the EU have to order now, it will take many years

Hope we get a EU army we talked a long time about it but nothing really came out of it. I hope we become the next superpower so we can help our allies and defend our interest.

@delta2372

Жыл бұрын

The EU is to disunifed for any joint military for it's members, as for france being a superpower, while I can see you guys becoming the dominant power in europe and the mediterranean (unless turkey rises in power in which case they will be your primary rival) france does not have the capabilities to be a superpower. While having a healthy birthrate compared to your neighbors like germany who is currently dying, you do not have the giant population that the US or china have (though china to is dying of old age) to be able to successfully compete with american and chinese markets, and you don't exactly have a competitive tech and industrial capabilities that the two current superpowers (america and china) along with the japanese and koreans have. That being said having a powerful ally in europe would be very nice to have with how chaotic the coming world is shaping to be. If you do read this then thanks for listening to the rant of some american giving their outside opinion on a european power.

@BS-vm5bt

Жыл бұрын

@@delta2372 The EU combined has a population of 450 million without the UK and ukraine. With both of them we got a population of around 600 million. That is 600 million people combined with a gdp larger then the US. Without the UK and ukraine we would be the 2nd largest economy. A 2% spending on defense would be around 2/3 of the US millitary budget. With a 3% spending which is the same procentage the US spends on defense we would be slightly smaller or larger depending on the question weather the UK is in the EU or not. The problem is it will never happen since nationalists think of its own self importance. That makes cooperation an impossibility. One thing that annoys me the most is the part where many european people thinks america is against it and that we should rely on NATO/American tax payers to defend us rather then ourself. Since they say that an EU army does not have american support because we would have some diffrences on our foreign policy. Though I think americans would be happy with a strong ally even though some of our foreign policy might differentiate on some areas. Since america would not need to pay a dime for european defense. As a example the EU currently has a combined milllitary of 3.7 million troops 1.7 million is active duty professional soldiers. We outnumber the russians already 2 to 1 with a average spending of 1.5% of gdp. But because of inefficiencies we got lower volumes of equipment since we produce 3 different aircraft's, 7 different tanks, 22 different IFV types, etc. This parallel production is creating an artificial bottleneck that make us weaker for no reason. If we standardized our equipment we could rival the US in millitary strength. Making it harder for russia and china. Though that will not happen since we got idiots in power, like america got some idiots in power aswell. I do not know what it is with some people in power and sabotaging their own nation. edit: I like to rant aswell as a european or more specificaly a swede who is for a european federation. Though a lot of my countrymen disagree with it. In general there is large support for a EU military in the younger generation while older generation is against it since they feel threaten by it destroying our individual culture. Though I think the EU is not a threat to it since we got a single market yet we have not lost our own language. The EU is great if we want to help each other creating a better world rather then tear each other down to make ourself look better. I think there is some similar dynamics between US states where some states does not like to cooperate on some projects because of ideological differences or some other reason. Though america is a lot better on cooperating with each other then people are within the EU. I think we should learn more of that from america like america could learn about our mixed market economic system from europe. We all have diffrent areas we need to improve on, no nation is perfect as I like to say. Link to europes combined strength. Might look a bit diffrent now when we are militarizing after 2022. This war in ukraine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Security_and_Defence_Policy

@obolobol-hz1vg

6 ай бұрын

​@@BS-vm5btthe european military industrial complex is scattered and the political will weak.

@kam7r882

5 ай бұрын

there is already a EU army ... the french army 😅

Lasers weapons if you don't have them get them

Ojalá Francia pueda construir su nuevo portaaviones pronto lo necesita urgente, y dar descanso al CDG!!!

How does it "compare" to the American FORD CLASS?

Thank you Charles de Gaulle the last visionary for France! He did everything for our country to be independent on army industry like chars, weapons, artillery, fighters, submarine, nuclear head bomb. Unfortunately we don't have a president like this now😢

Epsan printer ni na Paul

So there is NO new carrier.. Why do you make this video? And why am I watching?

@abhirammani3417

Ай бұрын

Any changes now😂

By having one it’s not really a nations asset it’s more like a nato asset.

Germany new carrier 80.000 tones, France 70.000??Italy moves for other 50.000 tonnes

This is a US carrier and planes in the video.

The world is shocked by a vaporware carrier that doesn't even exist? I doubt it.

It does not compare to the US Ford Class .

@Zetler

Жыл бұрын

The French is now only 20 years behind the Americans instead of 30 years behind. What an achievement.

@alphakky

Жыл бұрын

Not meant to.

Super carrier really?

🇨🇵📡🇺🇲

F:Fearless R:Resistance A:Against N:Nazis C:Communists E: Englishmen

@ronjohnson1658

Ай бұрын

Excellent - Vive la France!

The French payd 230 million € in pa2 design, now in other design??

@obolobol-hz1vg

6 ай бұрын

15 years ago, we paid more for a project with uk before they décided to leave.

it is to small.

I totally disagree with Russia being a superpower. If it was, indeed, Ukraine would have fallen in two weeks. It is a, giant, raw ressources provider. In an also giant, country. But mainly empty and universally poor. And in the hands of a man who will have beaten all soviet-leaders in "longevity"...👎 As for our navy, I fear we won't see our PANG for a long, long time. 😬

Vaporware until it hits the water.

So why have we not heard on W wide news???? That’s a lovely big target to fire at😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 That’s why the yanks did not go any bigger!

Doesn't Britain already have 2 brand new aircraft carriers active? As for the best 4th generation fighter.. The typhoon eurofighter is just as capable if not better...

@dreamix1492

Жыл бұрын

the british have steam aircraft carriers and no catapults, and the eurofighter is not navalized

@BuFuMAV4ICK

Жыл бұрын

@@dreamix1492 The carrier's have f35's because they're more advanced... Never said they were to carry the eurofighters I was making a point that they are just as good as the Raphael.... By the time France makes the thing there fighters will be obsolete.... France will no doubt have a 5th gen fighter by then, so I doubt the aircraft carrier will be made with an obsolete fighter in mind.

@Kamonohashiii

Жыл бұрын

@@BuFuMAV4ICK the Rafale is omnirole compared to the eurofighter. France is currently working on a 6th gene omnirole fighter too

@francinesicard464

Жыл бұрын

Nuclear?

@Then.72

Жыл бұрын

@@dreamix1492 the UK invented the steam catapult and the STOVL launch system but proved STOVL to be great during bad weather during the Falklands war. When you work in shipbuilding you wouldn’t want to be onboard any surface vessel powered by nuclear reactors

Will be the most advanced carrier in the world? Not likely? Not to say they’re not advanced, but with the 11 new 13 billion dollar each aircraft carriers, I think the Americans will have the lead for the next 30 years, more than likely? & with 1 or 2 aircraft carriers total, compared to the 10-12 super carriers, and the other carriers the Americans have, as well as the giant reserve fleet they have. Nobody does naval air warfare like the U.S. and without the Japanese and the British not really having much of a naval air-fleet anymore. The U.S. is the only nation to really understand and still be able to do large scale naval warfare. Now if you wanted to make a claim in this same regards for French submarines, you would have a much better argument I would think? Since I believe that they have a pretty remarkable line of new nuclear ICBM and attack subs coming on line that seem to be more comparable to U.S. submarines of the same type. But that’s just my opinion and I only know what I read and see on KZread lol!

@ShinoxSturmreiterDesTode

6 ай бұрын

All the east coast was French in the past, we are all around the world!

Aircraft carriers were the weapon of force in WWII. That war ended 77 years ago. Now an entire carrier group can be taken out will one missile. The future goes to missile and drone forces balanced with accurate and adequate explosive power.

@reubenmorris487

Жыл бұрын

Guess you've never seen how much firepower a carrier can project.

@icu17siberia

6 ай бұрын

Every country that can’t build a carrier says that, but they always react to the announcement of a new one.

@veritycloud1236

4 ай бұрын

Ever heard of a SAM system?

The French new carrier is coming in 2037? LMAO. By then American carriers while be able to transform into a giant flying robot with their support ships.

@ridethecurve55

Жыл бұрын

But! If the Frenchies installed a trebuchet to launch its fighters instead of an electromagnetic catapult, well, THAT would be truly 6th gen ! I'm surprised the Frenchies haven't thought of this yet!

@kaylacrawford4214

Жыл бұрын

M

@matthewarsenault463

Жыл бұрын

The latest American aircraft carrier is expected to last 50 years even the Abram tank I believe was built in the 80s military equipment is meant to be upgraded over the years and you'll be surprised how long it takes to get projects going the new Canadian Navy they're building right now is expected to last until 2070 says I'm 40 years old I'll probably be dead before those ships are retired my point is that military planning takes decades

@matthewarsenault463

Жыл бұрын

Gerald R Ford aircraft carrier was ordered in 2008 was commissioned in 2017 deployed in 2022 that's about 24 years like I said military projects take a long time

@tricotinedominique917

Жыл бұрын

French army budget 50 Billions usa 800billions

My question is how do u know this will happen? Maybe the russian military will destroy france with its ICBMs??(nuclear missles) maybe…

@transalp1853

Жыл бұрын

Please... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force_de_dissuasion

@transalp1853

Жыл бұрын

@@jordananastasijeski9209 You can delete France as fast as you can, french nukes are launched from submarines. The retaliation doctrine is automatic.

Bet it has more revers gears than forward.

@didierpaya9069

Жыл бұрын

troll spoted...

@victor6814

Жыл бұрын

So we can sell them to US for Afghanistan.

@mondocane123

6 ай бұрын

It's spelled 'reverse" david.

What a weird, overly glazing propaganda peace...

The Charles De Gaulle is neither Gigantic nor a Supercarrier. the De Gaulle is only 85 8ft., compared to the USS Nimitz at 1092 ft or the USS Ford at 1106 ft. Also to qualify aw a Supercarrier you must weigh at least 70,000 Tons and be capable of carrying at least 80 Aircraft. the De Gaulle is only 42,500 tons and capable of carrying 40 Aircraft which disqualifies it on both counts. The Nimitz Class on the other hand is 100,000 tons and is capable of carrying 90 Aircraft, while the Ford Class is also measured at 100,000 tons, it can carry 90 Aircraft plus an undisclosed number of Unmanned Reconnaissance, Refueling, and a Attack Aircraft (UCAVs). Now THOSE are Supercarriers. PS The Chinese, Russian, Indian Italian, Turkish, South Korean, and Japanese Navies are all larger than France's. Also the PANG (Future Naval Aircraft Carrier) which is supposed to be a Supercarrier but is not going to be one since it is expected to be 75,000 tons which qualifies but will only carry 30 Aircraft (not 80 or more as needed)plus an undisclosed number of Unmanned Aircraft (UCAVs) which does not qualify. Since it won't be ready until 2038 and will replace the De Gaulle, which will be Decommissioned, how does this "grow" the French Navy?

@Jugement

8 ай бұрын

Straight up lies. We have more Destroyers, more Subs, and more Helo Carriers (they got none) than Italy (They got more frigates and patrol vessels... lol). Their 2 carriers combined still have a lower total displacement than the CDG, arent nuclear propelled, and have a much lower tech profile overall Turkey literally has 0 Destoyers, 0 AC, 0 HC, for about 20% more Frigates, Subs, and Patrol Vessels France Navy is comparable in size to Japan and South-Korea. China, the US, and Russia obviously are the biggest players, with India on its own league behind them. Everyone else however comes behind.

@Just_another_Euro_dude

5 ай бұрын

Don't worry, EU's navy will be MUCH bigger. 😅👍

The Royal Navy's new carriers are the blueprint for next gen flat tops, I suggest you do some research before you make videos mate, it'll make them more interesting and/or factual. The Rafale is a 4th Gen aircraft, the Royal Navy/US Navy/USMC Carriers have 5th Gen F-35's so they're behind there as well. The Royal Navy's Carriers have about 800 crew on board because of how advanced it is. The QE Class Carriers are bigger, more advanced, can carry more aircraft and are just generally better mate, sorry......

@brandonr6804

Жыл бұрын

The 2 aircraft carriers of the Royal Navy are simply two big targets with no defensive weapons and poor quality aircraft. The aircraft carrier charles-de-gaulle has undergone during these technical stops a modernization and a renovation to allow it to have the latest technologies. The CDG has a nuclear propulsion whereas the British aircraft carriers do not. The Rafale has nothing left to prove, it is a 4.5 generation aircraft. The F35B has technical problems, a shorter range and a smaller payload. If the F35B wants to carry out important missions, it must carry weapons under its wings, and therefore more stealth. British aircraft carriers are designed for amphibious support or near the coast.

@brandonr6804

Жыл бұрын

@Endika Eche Some British people still believe that the Royal Navy is the same as it was several years ago, but this is no longer the case.

@avb4805

10 ай бұрын

U are just jealous of the french, u are RIDICULOUS 😂😂😂

@brunol-p_g8800

8 ай бұрын

The QE air wing consists of 24 f35bs under normal circumstances ( as of today it still doesn’t operate 24 f35s) or 36 in extreme cases and 2 Merlin. While the CDG’s air wing consists of 30 to 40 Rafales, 2 Hawkeyes, 2 Caïman marine, 2 Dauphin Pedro, and soon 1 Panther. A minimal search on Wikipedia shows it. The CDG has a nuclear strike capability, cruise missile strike capability, electronic warfare capability, long range fire and forget air to air capability, air defence capability by itself (the ship itself with his Aster missiles, not talking about the planes), deep strike capability against active enemy air defences, Hawkeyes,etc… The QE and Prince of Whales have none of that…

@obolobol-hz1vg

6 ай бұрын

What can you do only with F35 on board ? They need other planes with them. And only available at 50% with a lot of maintenance.

oH i'M dEfInItElY sHoCkEd

Still not as big as the US carriers

@didierpaya9069

Жыл бұрын

French army budget 50 Billions usa 800billions

@painjerome7304

11 ай бұрын

Indeed because Frenchies are not as fat as US people

@icu17siberia

6 ай бұрын

Doesn’t have to be. Only sails to the Mediterranean Sea.

@Just_another_Euro_dude

5 ай бұрын

That's why USA debt is 34 trillion dollars and EU debt is 14 trillion dollars. 😅😅😅😅😅 Enjoy suckers. While we enjoy universal healthcare, free education and superb public transport.

@gandigooglegandigoogle7202

21 күн бұрын

it's like in love you don't need to have the biggest one to satisfy your ego! It’s all in what we do with it!