Thanks for the informative review. I'm more in love with this pack than I was before watching.

Great review I have the Kajka 65 and am very happy with it.Comfortable ,well designed and excellent quality.

Cool, my Kajka 75 arrived home yesterday, I'm 5'6 and it fits awesome I don't regret, It comes with a rain cover and it is high quality

Fjallraven should pay you for this review ;) !!! I bought my Kajka 100 , 2 weeks ago for long distance walking only because I watched your videos from Scotland ;) the material of this bag is amazing too !!! This is a “bag” for life !!! Thank you for a Great review and all the best !!!!

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Cheers! Sometimes I think I should've got the 100L version, more room for food and beer! All the best 👍

@mrxy4254

Жыл бұрын

with the 100 you can carry stuff for months

@mrxy4254

Жыл бұрын

@@max.15 Deuter is not nearly as resilient.

Just stumbled across this. What a great channel! Food and wild camping, what could be better. I've 4 days of sitting around at work, so I know what I'll be binge watching.😀

@Adventure-Outdoors

Жыл бұрын

Cheers mate, thanks for watching! 👍

I have been looking at every pack out there and I actually stumbled across this one because I was ordering Trekking Pants from the same company and saw they had packs. I decided to see if anyone had done a review and found your video. THIS is the exact pack I have been searching for. I just ordered it. Thanks for the great review of the pack. I also subscribed to the channel to see what else you got going on.. Thank you again!!

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks Tom, much appreciated! I'm sure you'll be happy with the backpack 👍

@GetUpTheMountains

Жыл бұрын

A year later, how do you like the Kajka?

Thats a well thought out bag. The front opening panel is a great idea. 👍👍

My favorite backpack!! Well done on the review!!

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks! 👍

I tryed Fjällräven Kajka 100 and it felt really good to carry heavy 20 kg weight. Very good backpack! I chose Fjällräven Kajka 100 (100 liter).

Awesome Video! Thank you for sharing. Can't wait to see more content 😊

Hiya mate, I hope you are keeping well and enjoyed your Christmas. Well I bite the bullet and went for the 100ltr version in forest green. I thought the 100ltr would suit my body size better. I appreciated your advice on sizing. Word to the wise, I added my pack to my Amazon basket and the price fluctuated from £384 all the way down to £249. This price changed daily, I managed to bag mine (sorry unintentional pun😏) for £249 which I was so pleased with. A beautifully made pack which I can't wait to try out properly. Happy new year, I hope we all get out and about a bit more in 2021. Cheers 🍻 Seamus

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Cheers Seamus, I bet the 100ltr version is a monster....you shouldn’t run out of space! £249 is a great deal especially for the forest green; that colour rarely gets discounted. All the best for the new year mate 👍🍺.

Brilliant review, I have been looking for a good review and it looks perfect for what I want.

@Adventure-Outdoors

Жыл бұрын

Thanks mate, it’s a cracking pack but it’s bloody heavy; 3.7kg empty so it isn’t great for altitude hiking unless you’ve got legs like a packhorse! Very comfortable though and bomb proof. Atb mate 👍

@Macoutdoors361

Жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors it's either this or an Osprey Aether plus but I just love the build quality of your one.

Those birch pieces are quite unique. Never seen that on a pack before. And being able to clip the lid onto the front too. Lid comes of my Wisport Racoon but not able to clip it to the front like that. I think I'd find that a really useful feature. Great review mate.

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Cheers mate! Yeah the birch frame is a nice touch, gives the bag a nice classic look 👍

Excellent review. That's a beast of a bag. Some fantastic features on it, very tempting. At some point I will grit my teeth and look at the price!

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Cheers! It's a great bag Neale, but the RRP is on the high side (like every Fjallraven product). I just sat it out and waited for some one to put it on sale and managed to pick it up with £100 knocked off....softened the blow a bit 😂👍.

@nealeford1964

4 жыл бұрын

I had a look at the price, not as terrifying as I expected. But it is a lot of bag for the money

Very useful review.. thanks mate 👍🏽🙏🏼

Great review

Thanks for this review.

Great review man!

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! 👍

I’ve been searching for a front opening backpack for awhile now. This helped me a lot. I bring a long telephoto lens with me and front opening allows me to access the camera with the lens attached easily. The side opening packs were no good because the very expensive lens would have to live without any padding on one side. Very risky. This solves everything.

@Adventure-Outdoors

Ай бұрын

Hi, the front opening feature is very useful. I have the Abisko 45L pack and it also has front opening. Thanks for watching 👍

Great review. But now I have the "wants". I guess my Lowe Alpine Apalachan 75 will now be retired, along with the other 10 rucksacks and backpacks. Fjallraven becomes an addiction. I have several pairs of the Vidda pro britches, because ......why have 10 pairs of surplus combats when you can have one pair of Viddas? It's all Ray Mears' fault. With his Gransfors Bruk axes and such. We were all happy in our our Rohan bags, using £6 Wilkinsons hatchets and £5 "sheath knives" until he came along. :)

Iv checked this and ospreys total copy the archeon 70l , - side pockets , my problem with my own ospreys they wrap around you car seat like , i found the design of this steals a fair amount of space .as you are litterally fitted into the pack , i chose the fjallraven to fit my nikon fx dslr in and feel relatively safe

Great review mate it looks an amazing pack I’m gonna get myself one. I had an aether 70 which I regret selling as it was great for carrying that extra weight for camping. I squeezed quite a bit in to my Archeon 45 and did a camp in the cheviots last night. Nearly bloody killed me going up high in the heat plus the pack isn’t designed for that much weight. ATB mate 👍

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks mate, it's a great pack and carries heavy kit really well. I only really use it for winter camping these days as the bag itself is fairly heavy at 3.3kg, solid backpack though and should last forever 👍.

@Paul-eu9jp

2 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors hiya mate I wonder if you can help me. My new pack came and I don’t understand what I’m doing wrong adjusting the back length. I’ve lifted the flap and pushed the padding up to the top. Pushed the Velcro back down and it still moves freely up and down instead of staying in a locked position 😩

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

@@Paul-eu9jp Hi mate, yes it will move around, it's best to adjust it with some weight in the bag. Once it's weighed down it will sit at the level you have adjusted it at as the weight pulls the bag down on the harness. It's a bit difficult to explain, but what you're adjusting is the length between the hip belt and the back pad and the system relies on gravity to maintain the fit. Hope that helps!

@Paul-eu9jp

2 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors that’s great mate thanks for replying to me I ll try that 👍

It's a great bag! When im done with my Lundhags bag thats the one i will get!!

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Ahh I looked at the Lundhags 75 before I bought the Kajka, it looked like a solid backpack 👍.

@pontusfroling1906

4 жыл бұрын

It's the 75 i have :) Also a good bag!

Thank you for nice review! Could you give me your thoughts about comparing the keb 72 vs kajka 75? Which would you prefer in hiking?

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, I haven’t used the Keb 72 but I’m guessing it’s a little lighter than the Kajka. I think if you’re hiking long distance then a lighter pack might be worth considering? On the other hand, the Kajka carries heavy loads very well. 👍

Great review thanks, also wondering what trousers are those that you’ve got in in this video?

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

Cheers! The trousers are Helikon-Tex Pilgrim Pants, here’s the link 👍www.helikon-tex.com/en_eur/sp-pgm-dc-pilgrim-pants.html

Thank you for this informative review. Do you got some information on the keb 72? Since I’m going to do travel the world for quite a while, I need a backpack and been deciding between the Kajka and the keb for quite a while. Maybe you can help me with the decision. Greetings from Germany

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, I haven't used the Keb 72 but it also looks like a great backpack. It's slightly lighter than the Kajka and more narrow which might be useful in the busy and crowded cities of India etc. you're The removable lid on the Kajka would come in handy as a shoulder bag/waist pack allowing you to leave your backpack in a hotel whilst still being able to carry your valuables, camera etc. To be honest I don't think you'd be disappointed with either of them! Good luck with your decision and your trip 👍

This was a good video. Thank you for publishing. I'm not happy with the mesh parts. I want a pocket without mesh like keb. Twigs get caught. Velcro sticks. I hate mesh.

Cheers for this mate. I've seen quite a few reviews for this and the 85 as I'm trying to convince myself to buy one. I'm more interested in the 100L as my wife is tiny so she'd carry the light stuff and the rest, well, goes on my back. Hard to find any reviews for the 100L though. Either it's crap, too new, or people who carry it are still recovering ....

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

😂 yeah the 100L is a big rucksack, I met a guy using one a few years ago when I was hiking up to the Preikestolen in Norway; the guy was about 6ft8 and built like a barn door though. The lid expands pretty far on these bags so you could always carry a dry bag up top if you needed extra capacity on the 75 or 85L. Great quality rucksack though and should last years. Thanks for watching mate 👍

@theasiamtmgroup

2 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors After further thought, and thinking on the days that are snowy or proper cold (aka, no wife in tow), I do believe the 100L would just be overkill. Due to this and the expandability under the top lid, as you mention, I think the 75L would be in order. I was torn between this and the 85L but the 85L is 84CMs tall and would be over my head (in more ways than 1). I think that top lid expandability is how to get away with more gear than the pack can carry. Thanks again for the review.

Hi, thank you for an in depth honest review. I'm considering the Fjallraven Kajka myself. Could you tell me roughly your dimensions (Height, weight etc). The 75 litre seems to fit you well. I'm trying to work out what size is best for me. Would you recommend the 75 litre or the 100 litre? Is the 100 litre too big? Problem is there's not many high street shops that stock them for trying for size. I would appreciate your thoughts/advice. Cheers

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Seamus, I'm 5'10 and 180lbs, the 75 litre is perfect for most of my needs. There have been a few times where I could've done with some extra space, usually when winter camping with my wife when I needed to carry more provisions. But travelling solo the 100L would be too big I reckon. With the 75L, you can always strap a dry bag to the top if more space is needed. It might be worth ordering both online and sending one back and keeping the one you think will fit you best? Hope that helps 👍

@seamusgallagher4316

3 жыл бұрын

Overland and Outdoors Hiya Mate, thank you so much for your reply and advice. I currently have a cheap 65l pack that I used on a recent course and I found it too small and ended up taking a second smaller pack. Luckily there wasn't too much walking involved. I'm loving your Channel which I only recently discovered. Keep up the awesome content. As a fellow Overlander & Bushcrafter I appreciate your experience and shared knowledge. Cheers

Hi please correct me if i am wrong but when you unzip the bottom compartment to get at the mesh area i think the outside flap should be rolled inwards so the poppers on the bottom of the bag connect to the poppers at the bottom of the mesh???

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Terry, I’ve just had a look and yes it looks like that’s how it works. I’ll be honest I’ve never used that feature yet though! 👍

@terrylecheminant7435

3 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors i looked at several videos of this rucksack and i do not remember one of them that showed how it actually attached so i just studied the bag in detail,my 65 ltr Kajka comes next week cannot wait to hit the trail with it,keep up the videos coming mate,terry.

Great review. What colour is your pack? Graphite or forest green?

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks! The pack is graphite 👍

How does your back piece stay put mine slides down when i take it off .. theres a zip pull missing trekitt says its not supposed to have a pull yet all the videosvsay different

@Adventure-Outdoors

2 жыл бұрын

By back piece do you mean the adjustable back harness? If so mine is fastened with velcro; it doesn't move at all. 👍

Alright, you convinced me. It’s a huge upper cut to my wallet, but I’ll have a pack for life.

@wimahlers

3 жыл бұрын

I own one too. One size bigger (85 Liter). Which is even heavier (about 3500 gr). Still, this backpack has advantages over many other backpacks. But that is not so easy to explain. Hence, the lengthy explanation below. Reason: Your backpack is, or should be, just one item of a multipurpose backpacking system. Here goes the explanation... Most long distance backpackers do have an excellent backpack weighing about a 1000 grams (or even less). And those long distance hikers think I am barking mad to use such a heavy backpack. And perhaps they are right. But... The heavy quality of this specific backpack gives me some ease of mind when being in remote places for a considerable amount of time (months). But more importantly this backpack is very comfortable with an excellent/optimum weight distribution between hip and shoulders. Which offsets the disadvantage of the backpack being heavier. I.e. it "feels" lighter. Though it of course isn't. Which may be noticeable in long and steep inclines. But all that was not my main criteria. My main critera was (and is) the ease of use in bad weather. Specifically rain. And I explain... When it rains in the morning I like to pack in dry conditions. Meaning I like to pack while inside my tent. And the fact that the backpack opens like a suitcase makes it so much easier to pack while inside the tent. I have several tents but the tent I use mostly for my long distance hiking is the Hilleberg Enan. Using this tent I have the option to pack the inner tent separately while still being in/under the erected outer shell. I can crawl out of this outer shell already wearing my backpack and poncho cover (I prefer a poncho, as explained below). The only thing I have to do is break down and pack the wet outer shell in the (potential pouring) rain. Explanation of "Why I wear a poncho instead of a raincoat/pants"... A raincoat/pants is wonderful ... as long as you don't move. The moment you move it is (most often) hot due to the workout. And it gets wet from the inside (sweating). It is also a hassle to put on and of in between showers. Less so (or not at all) using a poncho. But before discussing the advantages of a poncho I have to discuss the disadvantages first. Disadvantages: 1) You cannot take your backpack of without taking of your poncho first. As such getting soaked anyway in the rain. And sometimes you need something from your backpack (water, food, toilet paper, a map or your phone. NB I do not rely on phone navigation or communication ... but some people do). 2) A poncho is noisy. Because it is not a bodily tight fit, it flies in all directions. Even in mild windy conditions. 3) A poncho may be a hassle while walking through thick bushes or narrow passages, getting caught all over the place. 4) A poncho does not cover your legs below the knee (or there about). Your lower legs will get wet. And, depending on weather conditions your legs may get uncomfortably cold. And in severe conditions may contribute to hypothermia. As to 4) You can use gamaschen (aka gaiters), long wool socks or still use some kind of rain pants. However, if conditions are so bad you risk hypothermia it might be wiser to make camp and wait out the bad weather. However, in my personal experience as a 3-seasons hiker I rarely experience such extreme conditions. In fact, I only experienced such conditions once (in a 2,400 kilometer trip). As long as the rest of your body is dry, and assuming you are not exhausted, dehydrated and are adequately fed, your exposed lower legs can tolerate a surprisingly low temperature in wet windy conditions. Provided, and I cannot emphisize this enough, you can keep your feet warm. How to keep warm feet I explain later. As to the disadvantages points 1) to 3) ... all this is a nonissue with the following dedicated poncho. Or actually purposely designed poncho-like rain garment for the long distance backpacker. See: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pYyV0Zqpoa_am5c.html The man showing the packa is a bit hyper. But he shows the versatility and usefulness of the packa well. The packa cannot handle a high backpack hood very well. And this is where the Kajka shines. You can take the hood of, but so can every modern backpack. However, unlike most backpacks (actually, unlike all backpacks I know) you can click and attach the hood in front of you. And that has some major advantages. Advantages: 1) You can pack most, if not all, of your daily needs in front of you in the hood (toilet paper, food, maps, phone, even 0,5 to 1 liter of water, and the like). And use this without taking your poncho of. 2) wearing the hood in front of you makes the packa not touching your body. This is an advantage because you don't lose heat through direct conduction between the rain on the outside and your body contact at the inside of the packa. 3) You create a pocket area between your body and the packa. Which results in a open airy less sweaty environment when walking. Though, granted, the hood itself is relatively tight to your body in the front. Creating the opposite effect, a sweaty area. Specifically in warm weather rainy conditions. Limitations: 1) You cannot attach any long items on the outside of your backpack. e.g. no full length trekking poles or skis. Otherwise the backpack rain cover part of the Packa won't fit. 2) Having the hood in front of you does make you fat. Which might be a problem in tight areas (some parts of the Appalachian trail. But no problem at all on the Pacific Crest trail). 3) If you yourself are fat to start with then having the hood in front of you might not be an option at all. How to keep warm feet. And I mean warm. Not dry feet. In fact, don't even try to keep dry feet. It is a futile exercise for most realistic long distance hikes. For what to use to keep your feet warm see: kzread.info/dash/bejne/qWWI0rdrmsatdpM.html These neoprene socks shown in this video are rather thick. Personally I have thinner ones. Use these neoprene socks in combination with: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4B2162xZJbWkbA.html Trail runners have an open fabric. You "pump out" the water while walking. They dry out relatively quickly when walking. More importantly, they dry out quickly enough to be "walkable". Maybe not completely dry but comfortabe enough to be walkable. The combination of trailrunners together with neoprene socks is what keeps your feet warm given certain extreme conditions. I am talking hiker extreme. Not antartica or mount everest extreme. One word of warning. Neoprene socks will smell terrible when used. And this smell is hard to get rid of (even several machine washings won't help). Use neoprene socks only when absolutely needed, Store these socks separately and consider it to be a thrown away item after relatively a few usages. As such buy the cheapest neoprene (replacement) socks you can find. Under less extreme weather conditions a long and thick heavy duty wool sock will likely keep your feet warm enough. Socks like: kzread.info/dash/bejne/i46ao7N-dLOohMo.html As to the trail runners ... ensure these shoes are one or several sizes larger than your regular shoe size. This not only to fit a thin neoprene or a thick wool sock but also because your feet will expand naturally during intensive hikes. Important! Always dry your feet at the camp site. Clean them, massage them. Use some lightweight dry footwear at the camp site. Store your wet socks in a dry bag and keep it with you in your sleeping bag to prevent freezing when in freezing conditions. Do the same with your trail runners. Always keep your neoprene socks separately. On a side note: Why I choose to use the Hilleberg Enan tent. kzread.info/dash/bejne/hmRt29WkmKyWprA.html First the disadvantages of the Enan: 1) The tent is relatively heavy (1200 grams). 2) There are many 2-wall tents with the same weight that have more floor space and more head room. 3) There are single wall tents that are even lighter with more floor space and more head room (about 800 grams. Note: some claim even lighter, But that is the weight with the minimum and least effective stakes and without the weight of the trekking poles. I don't use trekking poles and I do use more storm reliable stakes). 4) Hot in certain weather conditions (e.g. when erected as a 2-wall tent directly in the sun without any shade). 5) Due to the low profile more susceptible for condensation. Though manageable. Advantages of the Enan: 1) The strongest tent in its class. Highly tear resistent. Unrivaled fit and finish quality (but also. consequentially, more expensive than other like looking tents). 2) Due to its lower profile more storm resistant than many comparable tents. 3) A smaller footprint is an advantage in tight locations. 4) Versatility. The option to erect only the outer tent wall, only the inner wall, use both walls erecting simultaneously or erect the inner and outer wall separately. Why the Enan? Because I wanted a reliable tent for diverse weather conditions. Why don't I use a trekking pole tent, combining trekking poles with a tent? Because I have nerve damage in my right arm. Walking with anything in my right hand is uncomfortable. Would I recommend a lightweight single wall tent to others? I don't know. I have no personal experience with single wall trekking pole tents. But I do understand it is tempting to save about half a kilogram of weight on your back. Especially for a tent that, at the same time. is roomier.

@marcusaurelius3487

3 жыл бұрын

@@wimahlers I learned so much damn. Thank you for this long comment.

A very good video I have the same pack how someone would carry the 100 Ltre one I don't know I am on the west coast Isle of Skye if you're ever up this way and need a b&b look us up. Kilmuir Park. Also, like the Norway stuff keep safe and well to you both. kind regards Ian

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Cheers Ian, I'll look you up next time I'm up that way 👍. I know what you mean about the 100ltr pack, it must weigh a ton empty!

What color is your backpack?

Great 👍

What I don't like with this backpack is that you have to unclip 4 clips plus the top lid to be able to open the front. With a half price bag like the deuter aicontact pro you can directly open the front since it opens from the bottom and not the top. That's way more practical when you spend weeks and months sleeping outdoor. Only one zip operation and you can set up your camp, then pack everything again and in one zip you're ready to go. The Lungdags Gnaur is a bit better than the kajka too about that. But what I really like is the side pocket zip on the back side.

@floppinfish

Жыл бұрын

If your worrying about having a few more clips to undo than your definitely not fit to be outdoors.

@BaroudeurAventure

Жыл бұрын

@@floppinfish You don't spend enough time outdoor

Would love to know what pants you're wearing in this video?

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Hi mate, they're made by Helikon. Pretty tough pants, I generally use them for working in the woods and they have stood up to the abuse so far 👍 -www.thebushcraftstore.co.uk/helikon-pilgrim-trousers---coyote-56078-p.asp

be nice touch if fjallraven did a SEPERATE chest pack .. like osprey do

супер, спасибо!

Is this backpack waterproof? If not then is the Keb the waterproof version?

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, no it's not waterproof, but it comes with a rain cover. The Keb is advertised as waterproof but according to the Fjallraven website it only has waterproof material on the sides and on the base so I'm guessing you'll still need a rain cover in heavy rain?

@MrDosonhai

3 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors Thanks, I'll get this Kajka then. But is the velcro of the Kajka durable?

@Adventure-Outdoors

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrDosonhai The only velcro on the bag can be found on the 2 walking pole loops on the back so I wouldn't worry about it! The only concern is the weight of the pack, it is heavy, so I'd keep that in mind. It doesn't bother me but other people find the bag too heavy at 3.3kg. It's a very robust bag though 👍

@MrDosonhai

3 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors Thank you greatly.

The best and last rucksack I’ve had yet had quality issues with two zip loops breaking off so concerned about a longer trip. (Lost receipts). Wrong colour sent by supplier. The birch beams can be replaced by the alloy rods which hold the rear lid. There are other features. By far the most comfortable bag I’ve had…. But it is heavy. 25kg with this would feel lighter than 25kg elsewhere as the carry system is so good. Oozes quality but my one missed out?! Right on; where are the straps for the bottom? I’ll be walking when carrying so if made from Teflon and alloy I’d be eco happy; when will they stop selling on a rucksack or boots eco credentials when comfort and non failure far more important. Coming from military was concerned about use of Velcro on back to that extent but heard no complaints . Fallraven review will show more features as there are manufacturer one. Otherwise VG.

@user-bu8uk2yu8y

Жыл бұрын

Expensive too

Hi Ben, been tempted for a while on the Katja 75 although question the weight for longer hikes. Maybe that's fitness thing on my part😀 . Good review keep them coming, when's the next overland trip?

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Mike, the bag is definitely a little heavy! If I left the beer behind it would be less on an issue 😂. Probably next spring for any overland adventures unfortunately, we took a bit of a financial hit with the virus. Are you going anywhere? There still seems to be plenty of folk heading off in their trucks to Europe 👍

@mikehalliday4844

4 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors I think I will see if I can find a try before buy in the first instance just to be sure on weight, being pushed by my mates on the osprey Aether but like the quality of the flajv. On getting away that's a bit of wish at present but looking to getting to the hinterland of Dumfries and Galloway.

@Adventure-Outdoors

4 жыл бұрын

@@mikehalliday4844 Tris has an Osprey, it's another very nice backpack. You'll instantly lose a kg with the Aether which could be a deal breaker if you do a lot of fell walking. If I was made of money I'd have both!

@mikehalliday4844

4 жыл бұрын

@@Adventure-Outdoors no the feeling 😀

They overdid it on the length of the straps...you can fit a damn canoe between the pack and the top lid...great pack, had it for seven years now, very pleased with the comfort and durability, but it is way too 'technical' (meaning: lots of gimmicks you'll never use- and add weight)...

better this or osprey Atmos 65?

@itspatriciajones

Жыл бұрын

I’m wondering the same. Stuck on the kajka 65 and the Aura 65 :)

other packs have those features as well...... especially osprey packs. so then who copied whom?

For over £300 I think it has less features and the weight is over the top, but if you are looking a brand name I suppose you can't go far wrong.