FIRST NUCLEAR REACTOR IN SPACE SNAP-10A PROGRAM 1965 71502

Made in 1965 by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, this rare film discusses the design of SNAP-10A, an experimental nuclear reactor launched into space in 1965. The Systems Nuclear Auxiliary Power Program (SNAP) reactor was developed under the SNAPSHOT program overseen by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.
SNAP-10A was launched from Vandenberg AFB by an ATLAS Agena D rocket on April 3, 1965 into a polar low Earth orbit altitude of approx. 1,300 km. Its nuclear electrical source, made up of thermoelectric elements, was intended to produce over 500 watts of electrical power for one year. After 43 days, an onboard voltage regulator within the spacecraft - unrelated to the SNAP reactor - failed, causing the reactor core to be shut down, after reaching a maximum output of 590 watts. The reactor was left in a 700-nautical-mile (1,300 km) earth orbit for an expected duration of 4,000 years. In November 1979 the vehicle began shedding, eventually losing 50 pieces of traceable debris. The reasons were unknown, but the cause could have been a collision. Although the main body remains in place, radioactive material may have been released.
The SNAP-10A has three major components - a compact nuclear reactor, the reactor reflector and control system, a heat transfer and power conversion system.
The reactor measured 39.62 cm (15.6 in) long, 22.4 cm (8.8 in) diameter and held 37 fuel rods containing 235U as uranium-zirconium-hydride fuel. The SNAP-10A reactor was designed for a thermal power output of 30 kW and unshielded weighed 650 lb (290 kg). The reactor can be identified at the top of the SNAP-10A unit.
Reflectors were arranged around the outside of the reactor to provide the means to control the reactor. The reflectors were composed of a layer of beryllium, which would reflect neutrons, thus allowing the reactor to begin and maintain the fission process. The reflectors were held in place by a retaining band anchored by an explosive bolt. When the reflector was ejected from the unit, the reactor could not sustain the nuclear fission reaction and the reactor permanently shut down.
The eutectic sodium-potassium (NaK) alloy was used as a coolant in the SNAP-10A. The NaK was circulated through the core and thermoelectric converters by a liquid metal direct current conduction-type pump. The thermoelectric converters (identified as the long white "apron") were doped silicon germanium materials, thermally coupled, but electrically isolated from the NaK heat transfer medium. The temperature difference between the NaK on one side of the thermoelectric converter and the cold of space on the other created an electric potential and usable electricity.
The SNAP reactor program necessitated a safety program and led to the inception of the Aerospace Nuclear Safety Program. The program was established to evaluate the nuclear hazards associated with the construction, launch, operation and disposal of SNAP systems and to develop designs to assure their radiological safety.
A variety of tests were successfully completed and several videos of the development and tests are available for viewing.
Atomics International, then a division of North American Aviation was the prime contractor for the SNAP-10A development. Most of the systems development and reactor testing was conducted at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California using a number of specialized facilities. A United States Department of Energy video depicting the development and fabrication of the SNAP-10A is available.
The company also developed and tested other compact nuclear reactors including the SNAP Experimental Reactor (SER), SNAP-2, SNAP-8 Developmental Reactor (SNAP8-DR) and SNAP-8 Experimental Reactor (SNAP-8ER) units at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory. Atomics International also built and operated the Sodium Reactor Experiment, the first U.S. nuclear power plant to supply electricity to a public power system.
The testing and development involving radioactive materials caused environmental contamination at the former Atomics International Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) facilities. The United States Department of Energy is responsible for the identification and cleanup of the radioactive contamination.
The Idaho National Laboratory conducted three destructive tests of SNAP nuclear reactors at Test Area North prior to the launch of SNAP-10A. The SNAPTRAN-3 destructive experiment, on April 1, 1964, simulated a rocket crash into the ocean, purposely creating a fireball and sending radioactive debris across the Idaho desert.
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD and 2K. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com

Пікірлер: 22

  • @almostfm
    @almostfm4 жыл бұрын

    It sounds like this was the starting point for the RTGs used in our interplanetary probes like the Voyagers and New Horizons

  • @NikovK

    @NikovK

    4 жыл бұрын

    RTGs pre-dated SNAP in space, the first being in 1961. A big problem is that an RTG requires plutonium or other rare or prohibitively expensive isotopes to be lightweight enough to be practical. SNAP produced a lot more power for the same weight using "ordinary" uranium fuel. NASA is now going back to reactors in space due to the global plutonium shortage.

  • @DCFusor

    @DCFusor

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@NikovK Yup, Pu238 is not easy to get (Pu 239 is common and used in MOX reactors to get rid of what was once weapon pits). What's interesting here is that "the radioactivity will have decayed to harmless levels before re-entry". We knew better even then.

  • @RubyByte

    @RubyByte

    Жыл бұрын

    No you IDIOT. SNAP-10A uses a real FISSION reactor. Only an ape could confuse a full operating nuclear reactor with an RTG that only uses decay heat from Plutonium!

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain5 жыл бұрын

    I need one of those for my shed LOL

  • @jaystone3730
    @jaystone37303 жыл бұрын

    Seriously cool

  • @HE-pu3nt
    @HE-pu3nt6 ай бұрын

    0:50 Oh look it's Mr Happy. I wonder where he works now, probably at the US Customs and Immigration at JFK airport. As you can tell from his happy, easy-going and cordial demeanor he's is definitely over qualified.

  • @towedarray7217
    @towedarray72172 жыл бұрын

    Many spacecraft and even some Navy projects use a form of nuclear energy. Just wondering if devices with little radioisotope reactors can be deorbited to burn up when they’re dead or if they have to be more or less shoved at the surface of the Sun when they’re dead.

  • @BenjaminHartleyReturns

    @BenjaminHartleyReturns

    Жыл бұрын

    Parking orbit, raised to geocentric altitudes that are highly stable for tens if not hundreds of thousands of years. The USSR did the same.

  • @leerman22
    @leerman228 жыл бұрын

    NaK isn't very flammable with no air or water around.

  • @anhedonianepiphany5588

    @anhedonianepiphany5588

    5 жыл бұрын

    _EXACTLY!_ And, neither of them will bother it ... *_until its orbit decays_* - FFS!!! _SMHWLMAO_

  • @GroovyVideo2
    @GroovyVideo28 жыл бұрын

    where is it now ?

  • @PeriscopeFilm

    @PeriscopeFilm

    8 жыл бұрын

    Wikipedia says: After the 1965 system failure, the reactor was left in a 1,300-kilometre (700 nmi) Earth orbit for an expected duration of 4,000 years.In November 1979 the vehicle began shedding, eventually losing 50 pieces of traceable debris. The reasons were unknown, but the cause could have been a collision. Although the main body remains in place, radioactive material may have been released

  • @bicfj

    @bicfj

    6 жыл бұрын

    In November 1979 the vehicle began shedding, eventually losing 50 pieces of traceable debris. The reasons were unknown, but the cause could have been a collision. Although the main body remains in place, radioactive material may have been released. Later research, published in 2008 and based on Haystack data, suggests that there are another 60 or more pieces of debris of size

  • @Sennmut

    @Sennmut

    4 жыл бұрын

    Heating the lattes for Greenpeace?

  • @Sennmut
    @Sennmut4 жыл бұрын

    Another step forward, cut short by the Henny Penny's of our world.

  • @bobbymanganaro
    @bobbymanganaro2 жыл бұрын

    The best US Deadhand Dirty Bomb

  • @lajosjuhasz4523
    @lajosjuhasz45233 жыл бұрын

    first colonisating the space and breathaeble to do planets athmospheres now this is than a sd card if made in a 72 A hour battery greatness than can 1 MW/hour - 2-3000 MW /hour strom spring to do the power of missouri or ronald reagen in a car battery and ray less blue tooth 2 3, 1 stole huaweii and samsung. 3 work on so places where are not electrons in space

  • @rajuaditya1914

    @rajuaditya1914

    2 жыл бұрын

    This is the weirdest bot I have seen

  • @davelowets

    @davelowets

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@rajuaditya1914 or a weird ass person

  • @BenjaminHartleyReturns

    @BenjaminHartleyReturns

    Жыл бұрын

    @@rajuaditya1914ust a schizoid on the internet. They always fly off the rails. Rather sad.

  • @HE-pu3nt

    @HE-pu3nt

    6 ай бұрын

    WTH have you been smoking?!?