Finally US Test ‘Next Gen’ $1 Billion Deadly X-47B Drone

The US finally tests its new deadliest X-47B drone in action. This advanced military technology is beyond anything we've seen before! As the US military's first and only autonomous combat drone with the ability to launch and recover from aircraft carriers, the X-47B is a game changer for future battles. Armed with JDAMs, it is designed to fight side-by-side with manned aircraft. Though the X-47B has had a troubled past, recent tests show a huge development that proves it is still in the fight.
#drone
#military
#beyondmilitary

Пікірлер: 85

  • @maj.kennethwithrow8390
    @maj.kennethwithrow83906 күн бұрын

    This program was Axed in 2016, this story is eight years old.

  • @TheLifeOfKane

    @TheLifeOfKane

    5 күн бұрын

    Lol, the program was axed, replaced by a similar one... aka it was never axed Theyve been fielding test versions this last year

  • @aus2908

    @aus2908

    Күн бұрын

    @@TheLifeOfKane There doesn't appear to be any similar program except the Carrier-Based Aerial Refueling System research and the development of the MQ-25 Stingray, which is simply an aerial refueling drone, not a deadly attack drone 😂

  • @rickbase833

    @rickbase833

    6 сағат бұрын

    It's true. I was at Northrop when the USN shut down the X-47B. I then ended up working at a company that is a subcontractor on the MQ-25

  • @kyleknopp8093
    @kyleknopp80933 күн бұрын

    I have seen the TR-3B which is def the daddy to this one. Mine was silent and hovering. Black triangle with glowing orbs in each corner underneath. Like it was its power source.

  • @maxhansen-ho2fk

    @maxhansen-ho2fk

    3 күн бұрын

    Tr3b is the shit ❤

  • @Masrcus420

    @Masrcus420

    18 сағат бұрын

    IT IS AN ANI-GRAVITY PLANE. AMAZING WITH THE POTENTIAL THAT NO OTHER PLANE OR AI CAN DO. THIS IS THE UFO PEOPLE ARE CLAIMING TO SEE. I HEARD THIS WAS ORIGINALLY ELON MUSK'S UNTIL BIDEN SAID HE DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO CREATE HIS OWN WEAPONS WITHOUT THE HELP AND PAYING OUR GOVERNMENT WHO SPENDS TRILLIONS ON WARFARE.

  • @tuvoca825
    @tuvoca8256 күн бұрын

    They were working on scramjet drones long ago. I had a professor who worked on ion propulsion engines. They have people working on warp engines with various... uhm... workarounds. Interesting stuff.

  • @jimfulgham6866
    @jimfulgham68666 күн бұрын

    I noticed in the video showing it taking off and landing on the Carrier that the sea state is flat as a pancake. How does it do with a rolling and pitching deck?

  • @sierrawander7108
    @sierrawander71086 күн бұрын

    Can the military produce anything under a billion dollars.

  • @tuvoca825

    @tuvoca825

    6 күн бұрын

    Liz Cheny?

  • @Forevertrue

    @Forevertrue

    6 күн бұрын

    No, thank Boing, Grumman, and Lockheed. You have to pay for their same engineering over and over and over. Like every new drone that can take off and land on a carrier you will pay for over and over. America is being robbed.

  • @heath9782

    @heath9782

    5 күн бұрын

    Probably not, since the military doesn't produce the aircraft or tools they use. Greedy civilian businesses that seem to overprice everything they make! Whether it's pharmaceutical companies charging 100 times more than foreign countries for meds or the weapon industries selling billion dollar aircraft! Greed

  • @sierrawander7108

    @sierrawander7108

    5 күн бұрын

    @@heath9782 or the SCOTUS

  • @Alfred.E.Newman

    @Alfred.E.Newman

    3 күн бұрын

    NOPE toilet seats still cost over 20k apiece, and a bolt is 5 grand

  • @CAM-wk3dj
    @CAM-wk3dj6 күн бұрын

    People are always FIRST in ALL Missions💪

  • @nauka.religija7456

    @nauka.religija7456

    6 күн бұрын

    The Russians made a drone like this many years ago, it's called a heavy strike drone, they just don't produce it, do they not attach importance to such technology?

  • @x-man5056

    @x-man5056

    4 күн бұрын

    Imagine a fighter who's "G" limit 5x higher than 9 G's momentary that a manned fighter can.

  • @brooksc900
    @brooksc9005 күн бұрын

    A billion-dollar drone loses the war against a hundred thousand, 10,000-dollar drone swarm.

  • @Aftabba

    @Aftabba

    4 күн бұрын

    For anti-armor and anti-personnel target saturation? Sure, but they're different tools for different jobs. You need something that can fly hundreds of miles, and can deliver cruise missiles/guided munitions to penetrate hardened (under)ground structures. This demonstration plane had a service ceiling of 42,000ft and a max payload of 4500lb. It could fly higher, further, and deliver more potent munitions than any drone can, and that was 8 years ago. It's not cheap, but we similarly cannot scrap the Air Force and replace it with a million drones.

  • @CAM-wk3dj
    @CAM-wk3dj6 күн бұрын

    Hopefully, as our forces operate this advanced equipment, they can be recognized and accredited with education credits leading to degrees❤️

  • @AtroposLeshesis
    @AtroposLeshesis4 күн бұрын

    I think I caught these on video. I recorded my video about 2 years ago. I am not sure but the size looks right and so does the description I provided at the time. They were flying about 500 feet from the ground. It was filmed in north central Washington.

  • @Fifthmiracle
    @Fifthmiracle6 күн бұрын

    This program was cancelled in 2016, and the test aircraft have been in storage since 2017.

  • @TheLifeOfKane

    @TheLifeOfKane

    5 күн бұрын

    Lmao, its been tested for 8 years since that...so maybe you just made that up, or misread an article 😂

  • @kuyajectv7923
    @kuyajectv79235 күн бұрын

    This is very possible with space x developing the Drone

  • @kingrichee1817
    @kingrichee18176 күн бұрын

    2013 and we’re in 2024 🤔I wonder that they been doing since 🤔

  • @rokasb9441
    @rokasb94414 күн бұрын

    6:30 looks like starship from Star Wars :0

  • @eddybukayo7784
    @eddybukayo77846 күн бұрын

    And then china will make a thousand copycat of these and sell it to third world country 😅,,

  • @angelone8564
    @angelone85645 сағат бұрын

    Sky net performed flawlessly,...at first.. then it was given access to our most powerful weapons..

  • @somedude288
    @somedude2882 күн бұрын

    This thing got shot down by Iran in I think 2018 Ish

  • @reedwoodland1522
    @reedwoodland15223 күн бұрын

    It's the next step. Being 'cancled' in 2016 surely means there is no way it's happening now. surely.

  • @williamroberts6803
    @williamroberts68035 күн бұрын

    Um I think other drones have been launched from the deck of an air craft carrier. Smaller ones for sure.

  • @maxhansen-ho2fk
    @maxhansen-ho2fk3 күн бұрын

    Usa usa usa ❤ tr3b ❤

  • @NGAD2027
    @NGAD20276 күн бұрын

    They may use it to test New Technologies and Weapons, But the X-47 Program was Cancelled, The US Navy Deemed it too Expensive.

  • @tobyihli9470
    @tobyihli94706 күн бұрын

    Why the big deal of autonomous flight? Is it worth billions and billions? We’re not throwing them into the fight because they’re cheap, because they’re not.

  • @richardmckinnon8791
    @richardmckinnon87915 күн бұрын

    Lols already has an ABL Kill

  • @ogoshen
    @ogoshenКүн бұрын

    Why does everything have to cost a billion dollars?

  • @ThexBorg
    @ThexBorg3 күн бұрын

    X-47 can also carry a dozen loitering bombing drones against forward targets [sent out ahead to a few kilometres]. X-47 acting as a comms relay to kamikaze drone pilots [AKA like Ukraine].

  • @laron_t_green
    @laron_t_green5 күн бұрын

    Uh, the x 47 progam was canceled

  • @wrtekcz538
    @wrtekcz5385 күн бұрын

    Stargate x301 lol

  • @Forevertrue
    @Forevertrue6 күн бұрын

    They have the AI software now to take off, perform the mission, land, and reload. Now design a stealth drone around it to destroy the enemy with air to air, air to ground, and anti-ship missiles. there are tons of designs already out there.

  • @Crooked_Clown
    @Crooked_Clown5 күн бұрын

    Definitely not a fighter jet

  • @rickluttrell5529
    @rickluttrell55294 күн бұрын

    Seems expensive and very limiting. Next.

  • @WalterVetterli
    @WalterVetterli3 күн бұрын

    where do the Americans get the money from for this kind of thing?????

  • @x-man5056
    @x-man50564 күн бұрын

    This drone competed with Boeing's version for Navy Drone tanker and lost. Leave room for political decision over performance but I have no inside info on why.

  • @Pureblood712
    @Pureblood7125 күн бұрын

    No russian bots here?

  • @againstalladsgames
    @againstalladsgames3 күн бұрын

    While millions of Americans are starving and homeless.

  • @larryjenks31

    @larryjenks31

    2 күн бұрын

    While millions of illegal aliens -- *non-Americans!* -- are put up in hotels, given free medical care, all the free food they can eat, free education... to the tune of nearly 3 billion dollars thanks to the Biden administration and Democrats.

  • @juventux
    @juventuxКүн бұрын

    This amount of money for one drone is just foolish, with the money spent on it, you could create many jobs that would in tern create hundreds of thousands of smaller efficient military drones.

  • @jeffreyspinner5437
    @jeffreyspinner5437Күн бұрын

    Another weapon too expensive to use. Fleecing the public's tax money. Ffs. Just stop.

  • @paulm283
    @paulm2833 күн бұрын

    A terrible waste of time and money

  • @Man-ub5ik
    @Man-ub5ik6 күн бұрын

    The Chinese will 💯 copy the design n produce the knock-off version n will shamelessly boast about how their's were superior.

  • @Forevertrue

    @Forevertrue

    6 күн бұрын

    Or it will be sold to them by the US contractors. I do not trust any of them.

  • @hillmieahmad

    @hillmieahmad

    6 күн бұрын

    No, your f35 is useless. Who want to copy useless made in America products? They made better technology than america. Why need to copy inferior technology made from america?

  • @seanchang1202

    @seanchang1202

    6 күн бұрын

    And you will always heard this line every time they boast a new product comes up, “拥有完全自主知识产权” which means “Possess completely independent intellectual property rights” of that product.

  • @jan3019

    @jan3019

    6 күн бұрын

    They already did lol

  • @TheLifeOfKane

    @TheLifeOfKane

    5 күн бұрын

    ​@@seanchang1202lmao... thats so interesting, thank for the info 😂 such a shame their governemnt acts this way, China is filled with ingenious and hardworking people

  • @cthulholmhastur5317
    @cthulholmhastur53175 күн бұрын

    "In April 2015, it was reported that the X-47B demonstrators would become museum exhibits upon completing flight testing." Wikipedia. Not to mention the AI narrator. Utter clickbait.

  • @Alfred.E.Newman
    @Alfred.E.Newman3 күн бұрын

    COME ON MAN big deal its almost always already been stolen by the CHINESE unless hunter sold it to them less the 10 percent demanded by DEMENTIA joe

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd6 күн бұрын

    Would be curious of race and gender of the STEM personnel behind this plane. Guesstimate of 85+% White Male.

  • @ryanodneal7001
    @ryanodneal70016 күн бұрын

    This is junk. The only company iterating quickly and leading the technology of the future is Tesla, SpaceX ETC Elon Musk. Almost 20 years to build this junk and it can't land on a carrier. WTH. The old guard weapon companies are totally lost and have been for decades. Boeing has 2 Astronauts stuck in space right now. SpaceX will probably start designing weapon systems because they are so far ahead of every company on the planet by years and decades which is an insurmountable lead. Extremely impressive what Elon has achieved in an era of total losers. Thank God that the rest of the planet is even worse off for talent and innovation or our country would be at risk, strategically. We really lucked out.

  • @peek2much3
    @peek2much35 күн бұрын

    The problem is that Lockheed is the darling of the pentagon and the ones with the most lobbyists so when money gets tight they go to work grabbing as much of it as they can for LM. This leaves the awesome programs from NG in the dust even though they tend to be superior and on time. Just remember what happened with the YF23 which most experts consider even today as superior to the YF22. It’s all about politics and not about innovation.