I admire the creative people who are analyzing and sharing in absolute detail what they see from the data available at a given time frame. The human ego also gives them a hunch or feeling regarding the bigger picture that certain well known personalities push towards one agenda or another for many reasons, mostly Phd research papers and kudos for the history books. The problem is, the reality of the full picture that no one has the answer for yet is completely beyond human understanding. See what I did there.

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

Want to try backing up that conclusion with even *one* solid bit of credible, paradigm rocking evidence?? .....Mmmm, didn't think so.

One of the finest presentations I have seen on this topic. The Oscillating universe was something I took to favor decades ago and this was support for it from a different perspective with good insights. Paul shows a clarity of understanding exemplary which other authorities in AstroPhysics should emulate. Brilliant! I look forward to seeing more of his presentations.

@letitsnow8518

Жыл бұрын

Indeed. I only got to hear him recently and i am hooked! I ended up looking him up and read about his work. He is a great thinker, and a great communicator

Published on Feb 3, 2016. 8 days later, Ligo announced they observed Gravitational waves, in 2015.

@KitCatStudio

5 жыл бұрын

this is the comment I was looking for , just to be sure I'm right, and this is outdated... tnx

@jensraab2902

5 жыл бұрын

The gravitational waves that have been detected are from two neutron stars merging. That's not what Steinhardt is talking about here. He's referring to primordial gravitational waves that originated during the inflation period.

@Floxflow

5 жыл бұрын

And the LIGO results have been refuted. The data is indistinguishable from the background noise. See Andrew Jackson from the Niels Bohr institute about it. So Paul Steinhard does have a point.

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

Nonsense, "j.e.t. clem m."! Sheer balderdash. Get your "facts" straight. New LIGO detections have been approaching weekly occurrances since the *latest* round of improvements came 'on line'. BiCEP II (2012 announcement & follow up) is an entirely different thing.

He also added in things to make the math show a static universe and thanked the man that told him this for”bringing beauty back into the mathematics of his theory” that man was Edwin Hubble

@MichelG

4 жыл бұрын

Google what Nicola Teslas was saying about theoretical mathematics. If you want to loose contact with really, it's a good path.

That was great. Thanks.

Excellent and powerful, ecxept you misspelled Lemaitre, as I did except.

@iamnotevenanumber3312

5 жыл бұрын

expect?

Amazing mystery of universe will keep humans on their toes in search of truth forever.

I love it! *science* is never settled. It's just accepted until further notice...

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

Often it is only a matter of filling in details. BECAUSE we demand proof, we do not often need to backtrack very far. There are MANY very stable and secure positions in science such as the shape of planets and evolution. I suspect the "big bang" may be more purely speculative and mathematical. We need not be scientists however to speak up for a scientific epistemology to always be respected else results cannot be relied upon ESPECIALLY when they come from thousands of years old tombs by unknown authors who state things we have already disproven.

@JinGwee

5 жыл бұрын

Joe Caner i know where u're going with that. But that's not how science works. Established theories and experiments will NOT be proven wrong later on. They may become part of a bigger theory. For example, newton's law of gravity works wonders but einstein's theory of relativity later supercedes it. Einstein's theory, under certain conditions, simplifies down to become newton's law.

@mcw0261

5 жыл бұрын

@@JinGwee Lol, you must not know what a theory is. Theories are proven incapable of coherently aligning to known laws all the time and we find that some theories only work in specific conditions. And some theories are exactly that, theories. But you are right in saying that *established* observational, experimental theories are generally consistent. But this is highly different than historical theories. There is foundational knowledge and there is coherent knowledge. The 'gap' is the disconnect between the two.

@mcw0261

5 жыл бұрын

@@CGoldthorpe You think evolution is secure? A real scientist would first define his terms before saying that. Micro-evolution has been widely proven but macro-evolution...not even close.

@JinGwee

5 жыл бұрын

@@mcw0261 No, you are wrong. "Theories are proven incapable of coherently aligning to known laws all the time". Really?? Why do you make things up?? "And some theories are exactly that, theories. " No. Scientists use the word "theory" differently.from how a layman uses it. A theory is well supported by evidence, has been extensively tested, and has predictive power. What you have in mind is a HYPOTHESIS. It's different from theory. Without the theory of electromagnetism we will not have x rays, infra red, radio waves etc. Without the germ theory, we will not have modern medicine. Without the theory of relativity,we will not have gps. Without quantum theory, we will not have electronics. Do u know that newton's law of gravity is a subset of einstein's relativity theory ?

Schroedinger and wave function. Where is my doppelganger?

if you stack polarized tetrahedra into a particle in the e8 shape you would have a spherical particle with alternately charged facets. if these particles had no spin than I imagine that it would neither touch others like it nor push away but would seek a balance point(dark matter? graviton? electromagnetic field?). now if you crushed the particle all the others would try to fill the space(gravity). the wave-like movement by photons could be caused by the charge forcing them around these particles catching one side or the other. if you sectioned this particle then different pieces of it could make up the wide variety of subatomic particles? is this possible or is there something wrong with this way of thinking?

@1:06 it's "Georges Lemaître" and not Lematire

Nebulous with Stars Galaxy's & Multiple Big Bangs in it.

ok 1 in a googleplex ... out of how many possible outcomes? He never explained that. Is it 5 possible outcomes? Ours is one of them now our universe as an outcome is very low or is it a googleplex possible outcomes and ours is equally likely to any of the others?

Exclusion zone or zones in space? like the water tests in space this expanding could be the same .

*_...Prof. Steinhardt, I'd suggest that not, inflation, but renormalization, is, guaranteed in a big crunch preceding a big bounce preceding a big bang-as uniformly-sized neutrons are crushed to uniformly-sized quarks, then, uniformly-sized primordial energy (subphotons)-a hundred halvings, looking like exponential inflation, from the inside, out..._*

Paul Steinhardt should be given the Nobel Prize 🏆💖👍🌹

Fantastic! TY!!

@niccoarcadia4179

5 жыл бұрын

Mind the gap!

The Gap? it is the distance between a the size of Planck Length and a the size of a "Point"

@MrJdcirbo

5 жыл бұрын

Lololol!!!!!

When I hear about the bouncing universe hypothesis I always think about entropy where's the dampening of the bounces or falling from one dimension to another dimension down to another dimension down to another dimension....

@maryzhang9446

5 жыл бұрын

Rr Ii

Q: The larger the distance to a galaxy, the larger the redshift. And then there are several theories about what causes that redshift? And: If there would be a redshift because of the distance, then galaxies that are moving away seem to move away with increasing speed? Or not?

@vigilantenfdl4424

5 жыл бұрын

I'm just a knucklehead, so I could be wrong, but I think the redshift is from object moving away from us rather than the distance. Of course, something with a redshift is moving away from us very quickly, and therefore likely to also be far off.

Almost three years have passed since this TED talk. I forgot to mind the gap. Anything happen like he said? Are we in an inflationary multiverse with gravity waves and most parts unknowable? Or a knowable bouncing universe? Do we know yet? It's keeping me awake at night. And if it's bouncy does that mean Frank Tipler may be right?

@gammaraygem

5 жыл бұрын

try silent mind. solves it all in a blink.

*_...Prof. Steinhardt, regarding Inflation Theory-how does 'inflation' differ from 'critical expansion' r ~ t⁽²ᶴ³⁾ at t~0..._*

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

consult the bible?

Rick and Morty makes me think this is how it works.

It will tell us nothing of how the universe started. It may tell us that it is bouncing. It will not tell us how the original univers; That is where did the first universe come from that expanded and contracted and then began to bounce.

9:17 This is all assuming that Time is a constant, if time grows weaker over distance then the universe would just appear to be expanding faster at a distance and there would actually be a reason for quantum expansion to be constrained in to an even event...

@sarababineaux5055

3 жыл бұрын

Time is a product of the human mind; therefore, time would remain constant to us.

All of this is based on the premise that the speed of light is constant. I was recently pondering a piece on the existence of a 4th dimension that serves to modify space and time by warping and twisting all 3 dimensions in space. Think of the implications. It produces the possibility that what we observe is simultaneously both near and far or that what we are observing is merely a shadow or projection. It begs the question: Can something be close and far at the same time? The answer is yes, depending on the length of the stick you're using to measure it. So it follows that the speed of light is only constant relative to the size of the space you're trying to measure. This is interesting because it explores an idea not unlike quantum physics. Is the object you're looking at close or is it far? How do you measure it if the thing you're measuring it with (the speed of light) is itself in direct proportion to the size of the space you're measuring? This begs the question of whether space itself is fluid. Einstein showed that mass bends space. We know that energy can alter space as well. We could theorize all day but it's an interesting thought experiment.

@Graham-gt4gr

5 жыл бұрын

The idea that we are just projections in the wrong self relation has been around for a long time. I don't think science will ever solve these questions because the underlying reality is made up of complex numbers. They would need a whole new mathematical system. The people who impress me the most in these talks are the ones who are trying to reverse engineer the universe using transcendental geometry. I think the universe is probably 1 dimensional.

@stevetreloar6602

5 жыл бұрын

@@Graham-gt4gr Um, that implies the universe is a singularity. It certainly is not what we observe. Just so you know.

@zpdrmn

5 жыл бұрын

What thought experiment? You didn't describe any experiment that can be performed at least in principle (if not in practice.) It's more like thought masturbation than experiment.

@PrivateSi

5 жыл бұрын

You might like my hypothesis recently posted here.... The speed of light varies absolutely but is always measured as C locally in a vacuum. It is quantum-relativistic... Liquid Crystal Universe... I'm still trying to adapt it to some kind of relativity as it started off as a basic fully discrete, quantised idea. I've stuck to mainstream ideas and added a few of my own.

@MrSean03839

5 жыл бұрын

Particles can be in two places at once.

Apart from the intellectual brilliance of the speaker, it's also nice that he hardly "ermm"ed or "errr"ed etc.

If the possibility of getting a smooth Universe is 1 in google plex with the Big Bang theory, what are the possibilities with the bounce theory? To be more specific...?

@haggenjm

2 жыл бұрын

16:25

So Steinhart has finally accepted Roger Penrose's idea that inflation is not needed, and that the smoothness is due to a vanishing Weyl tensor at the initial state, or bounce - so why didn't Steinhart credit Penrose for this idea??

@MrJdcirbo

5 жыл бұрын

I am not a physicist. I am in the early phase of studying physics. So, I have some questions for you. Are you a physicist? What is your area of expertise, and what do you suspect is the answer (i.e. primordial atom, bounce, or wibbly wobbly fluctuation what smacked all the universe into existence)?

I REALLY don't understand what cosmic gravity waves have to do with expansion. Wouldn't that type of force, if it existed be 1 OVER gravity? What am I missing here?

The thing is...we're only going to evolve and exist in THIS universe the way we are... so it matters not how many googleplex universes existed before this one, eventually this one came along

Will people hundreds of years from now look back at our conversations the same way we look at the theories from the middle ages?

@RagingGeekazoid

Жыл бұрын

Maybe so. The 20th century may someday be seen as a halfway period where physicists had progressed beyond Newtonian physics but still believed in fairy tales like particles and relativity.

an eternal bouncing universe? what started the first thing to bounce?

@pyro1813

5 жыл бұрын

According to the book of Job, when God created the universe, all the angels shouted for joy! This was, of course, before the fall of Lucifer and his angels, who are now causing problems (evils) on earth. According to the Apostle John, in the book of Revelation, there will be a second "Big Bang" with the creation of a new heavens and a new earth.

So, this would not be the same Multiverse as the one in Sean Carroll's Many Worlds Theory, correct?

@RagingGeekazoid

Жыл бұрын

Correct, they're not related. The multiverse is a humongous megaverse with pockets of what we might call "normality" (individual "island universes") separated from each other by an ocean of inflationary energy. The universes of Many Worlds theory overlap each other (completely). They're more like radio waves of different frequencies all sharing the same air space, and more and more of them keep getting generated every second.

We're just a qualia of photons gathering in the darkness searching for the (combination) flashlight/radio.

In few decades there might be new fresh ideas/hypothesis on this subject. It might be the case that human mind biologically is incapable ever understanding existence of universe. It is rather perplexing how can something just pop into existence out of nothing. Quantum physics suggest string theory and membrane interactions causing universes to simply appear. But then, how did these membranes come into existence in the first place. It all goes back to the same question; how can anything just pop into existence out of nothing. It simply makes not much sense, thus singularity. Simply no one knows the answer. Who knows, maybe our existence is just a grand illusion.

Great 🇳🇴

Einstein’s static GR taught physicists that we must listen to the maths how ever much discomfort this may give us this

@debunkthis

5 жыл бұрын

I say we even though I am not yet a physicist

@lucasthompson1650

5 жыл бұрын

@Matt Riccio Sure you are. You're just not a well-known physicist … not yet. 😉

@debunkthis

5 жыл бұрын

Lucas Thompson who are you?

@lucasthompson1650

5 жыл бұрын

@Matt Riccio Just your friendly neighbourhood “KZread comment lobbyist” for encouraging people to embrace and educate themselves in STEM fields. PS. You are absolutely 100% correct about listening to and following the math.

@wiboparodytryacetonetryper8882

5 жыл бұрын

@Matt Riccio 🎵 Who who? Who who? 🎶

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools"

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

Please just go away, with this political-religious trolling. You have nothing new or constructive to say here, right? Please just pollute your own muddy little pond. We don't don't need your Ill-motivated sweeping judgements sullying the manifestly cleaner, much more transparent, far more ethical realm of the natural sciences... and obstructing progress in many social & cultural categories *truly* intended for the betterment of all human kind.

@naimulhaq9626

5 жыл бұрын

I think I have got the hang of Tedx Talks: BS.

@maryzhang9446

5 жыл бұрын

Jerald Mitchell

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

@ Naimul Haq... Well, we've certainly got the hang of you. Thanks for the pithy and succinct assist.

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

Why does this statement appear to here where people are indeed learning things? It looks like a desperate attempt to chime in without revealing any ignorance.

Is the universe expanding and contracting or is it SPACE that is doing so?

My biggest doubt with all of this is the fact that no theory seems to define what gravity really is. It's just a force that exists from volume and density combined which we've called "mass" which is the integral component of what makes the mathematics of quantum physics work the way we want it to. What creates this force of two bodies of mass? Does gravity create mass or does mass create gravity? And if they are finitely related then my other questions are how? and why? Can anyone explain this to a simpleton (like me)? If we can answer this, then perhaps they'll no longer be the need to explain negative mass when the traditional formulae no longer seemed to hold up.

@lestat198824

5 жыл бұрын

It has been a while since i studied it, so bare with me. Mass is determined not by gravity or volume, but an intrinsic feature of matter. How much energy is required to move something. They determine this by electron-volts. An electron-volt is the amount of energy required to move an electron across a field of potential difference of one volt.

@lestat198824

5 жыл бұрын

With the prediction and then discovery of the higgs field, that is what gives matter(or energy) its mass. We still do not have a model that unites gravity with our sub atomic world. The affect of gravity at the sub atomic level is still not detectable.

How do we know that instead of there being an expanding universe, that all matter is shrinking ?

@michaeledwards2251

6 жыл бұрын

Red Shift: If matter was shrinking light won't be red shifted. If your talking about space itself, we have no independent reference.

@MrJdsenior

5 жыл бұрын

Decent question though, shows you're thinking, keep it up!

@new-knowledge8040

5 жыл бұрын

@John Sikes. Thanks. My teacher, long ago, opposed my thinking. He basically told me to shut up because he said I didn't know what I was talking about, and he did so when I made a point about "Motion", a point leading to a paradox. Long story, but my parents pulled me out of school before I had the chance to acquire any physics education. But in my spare time years later, I began analyzing motion once again to resolve the paradox, and did so by figuring out what the basic requirements were to make motion possible. I found the answer. Without knowing it at the time, I had also independently derived all of the Special Relativity(SR) mathematical equations, and I had also independently derived the Lorentz Transformation equations. However, the method in which I derived these equations, is a unique method that I have not seen in use nor have I seen it taught anywhere. Of course some folk thought that I was full of it, and so I put together some YT videos to expose my unique "How to" method, and thus prove them wrong.

I've always suspected that inflation is BS because it's so Ad Hoc.

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

@ Phil V... You plainly could never be bothered to learn the research context from which the idea of inflation emerged for Alan Guth. This information is freely available online and has been known among better informed people for more than three and a half decades now. This is not to say that professor Steinhardt does not have a strong point regarding the inflation model's lack of inherent constraints against being overly adaptable to accommodate new data as required to stay relevant; but that is a result of a lack of constraining empirical data and knowledge about the initial causal patch and the originating event for our own event horizon universe. That fact itself has nothing to do with anyone being slack and gravitating toward easy "answers" -- "BS", as you so simplistically and stupidly call it. All qualified theorists understand these things... even if you do not.

the s in Einstein is sharp

wouldn't the universe expand at the speed of light.With formation of matter following the light expansion.Also would it expand uniformly in a360 degree circle around the center.Intuitively speaking that makes sense.Possibly to simple but it's a start.

Being an actual scientist I imagine he's now, in 2019, glad that important verifiable observation has provided evidence supporting The Standard Model but since he was personally in an opposing field to some degree, I'm also sure he is at least a little miffed at the results from LIGO. It is the lifeblood of science to hypothesize falsifications any way we can imagine. It is just as useful in many cases to gain knowledge of the wrong path to help define the right path, but ultimately we must bend to observation and it must hurt at least a little bit to find you spent years exploring a dead end..

@gammaraygem

5 жыл бұрын

airplanes are just very loud birds, right?

10:40 We are here! "Gezz, my body fits this hole perfectly therefore I was made to fit in this hole", said the water puddle. Statistics has no meaning when the sample size is 1...

@MrJdcirbo

5 жыл бұрын

Amen! Regardless of the outlandish odds of an event, if that event actually happens, the chances become 100 percent. Arguing against something with only probability calculations is something I call the statistician's fallacy. Show whether or not the damn actually happened, then we'll talk about odds

boyz toyz experiments used as pretext to build undeground military bases in Antartica - mind the energy :)

What's the chances that you will make your flight if you ask Google to guide you to MIA (Miami International Airport)? The answer is one in a Googleplex since they will take you to the American Airlines package terminal on the North edge of the airport, and by the time you get to the passenger terminal and through Airport Security, your flight will have already left, unless it has been delayed by 45 minutes or more, so I guess the odds are actually much better than 1 in a Googleplex, but I wanted to use that word to connect this to the lecture. Next time ask Google to take you to MIAD which stands for terminal D and is the street name of the departing flights road. In case you think Google will have fixed this by the time you need it, think again as it's been misleading people for at least 3 years and will also take you to the wrong place if you ask it to guide you to FLL (Fort Lauderdale International Airport). Also note, that if you use the desktop version of Google maps, it does not make these errors, only the mobile version, but who do you know hooks up their PC on the way to the airport?

I am under the impression that it had been discovered that the expansion is accelerating and our universe will disperse...?

@icghost2

5 жыл бұрын

You are correct Edgar, everything you hear here was disproven the moment actual gravitational waves were announced eight days after this video was made, having been discovered the previous September. With all those degrees, one would assume he'd get a memo or something..

Friedman's idea is the only reasonably idea. And we don't need to pass through the ZERO volume.

I'm not going to be impressed with science until I can download a waffle.

@letitsnow8518

Жыл бұрын

Here it is 🧇

Observation and data have massively narrowed the fantastical excuses, leaps of faith, and pure guesswork in the standard model. The universe is electric. IT IS OK FOR EINSTEIN TO BE WRONG! Knowing so can't hurt anybody, and Einstein would probably be happy to know, were he still with us.

@stevetreloar6602

5 жыл бұрын

Yet there is no peer reviewed science supporting that hypothesis.

if the bounce is correct, what started the bounce?

@jeromehorwitz2460

5 жыл бұрын

People are conditioned to believe that a story has a beginning, middle and end, but reality is not a story and nothing "started" it. Stories are just the way we explain reality to ourselves, but reality does not coform to storytelling conventions.

@mcw0261

5 жыл бұрын

@@jeromehorwitz2460 Math and Logic says that physical things have a beginning. Not really about storytelling.

@jeromehorwitz2460

5 жыл бұрын

@@mcw0261 Physical things only seem to have a beginning because they change form. The atoms in a rock or in your body already existed before they took those forms. The sub-atomic electrons and quarks already existed before they were forged into atoms by the gravitational pressures of stars. Forms don't appear by the work of a cosmic magician who makes them go "poof!" out of nothing, their basic, simple, underlying nature is beyond time. Time is just a human invention by which we assess the relationships between phase shifts, cycles and changes. Beginnings are illusions we create to demark the moment when things fisrt appear to us-- but they already existed in a different form before that. Reality transcends time and any sense of beginning or end.

@mcw0261

5 жыл бұрын

@@jeromehorwitz2460 I agree with the idea about the conservation of energy. That is what you are kind of describing and it's well known. Ask any scientist where energy comes from and they will tell you IDK. And I agree that mass is simply a form or boundary that controlls and manipulates energy. But by your logic, since *your* reality does not transcend time, you cannot not know if you are real. You do know that you are real right? Reality does not transcend time. The ultimate reality does. But you do not have the ultimate reality. Space and time are connected. You are in space and in time. Your mindset right now is not a sufficient excuse to not be held morally accountable for your actions. But there is a way out of this conundrum you have built for yourself.

@jeromehorwitz2460

5 жыл бұрын

@@mcw0261 You can call the essential "stuff" of reality "God" if you want, but that term carries misleading connotations-- don't confuse it with notions of a father figure or lord or ruler or creator of the universe-- that is just anthropomorphism.

all these intellectual people here in the comments section;blowing their own trumpets about how clever they are and how their work is so important to the human race! PLUMBER any one?

@BrettHar123

5 жыл бұрын

I agree, I used to be one, (physicist not one of these wankers). There is a certain type of Theoretical Physicist, who tells everyone that time isn't real, that everything exists at once, that there are multiverses and multiple dimensions, and most of them are cosmologists or String Theorists. I believe this is post-modernism infecting physics as well as a psychologial desire to tell the ordinary person, that their lived conscious experience is an illuson, and appear far more intelligent than they actually are. Steinhart spent 15 minutes, but failed to mention that this alternative theory which does away with inflation, which is BS by the way, was invented by Sir Roger Penrose, over 10 years earlier, and he was ignored by particle physicists who have no idea how General Relativity works.

@ck58npj72

5 жыл бұрын

Susskind was a plumber

@ck58npj72

5 жыл бұрын

@Ma Rk his father was too, he mentions this in a video here somewhere

ALL of SPACE is NECESSARILY ELECTROMAGNETIC/GRAVITATIONAL (IN BALANCE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY.

Unconvincing argument is unconvincing

@theglowcloud2215

4 жыл бұрын

And your rebuttal is...? And your qualifications to challenge this model are...?

You misspelled Lemaitre rather badly

The bigger universe is a fractal. The odds may be rare but we repeat. As a chance to exist and yet different every time. Ripples in the ever expanding or contracting pattern no location is the same to any other and yet affected by every other. Fractal. What level or dimension this is occurring." I don't know." I just live here 🤗

Time dilation ALSO proves that GRAVITY IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. By Frank DiMeglio

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

Oops, someone's sent a bulletin from the Thornhill loony bin again!

@souradeeproychoudhury7144

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah keep talking nonsense +Frank DiMeglio

Einstein was working from the wrong paradigm. Even so, research that comes to the wrong conclusions is still not useless. Funny that.

This talk can be summed up in one word: "Whatever"

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

For dolts, maybe. Better informed, better educated, and more engaged persons generally take a different view of such compelling scientific & philosophical pursuits.

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

Was the subject matter different than expected?

Wish I wasn’t so tired

Hubble found the red shift and drew the wrong conclusion

@gammaraygem

5 жыл бұрын

Halton Arp.

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

As if *you* would know.

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

Why should there be any shift if the speed of light is constant?

@MrBarryBurke

5 жыл бұрын

@@CGoldthorpe Red and blue shift refer to the wavelength, not velocity, of light. Red-shifted means light is detected at longer wavelengths which is what happens when the thing emitting light is moving away from you, although there may be other causes in specific cases- eg if light is initially emitted at a longer wavelength in the first instance. However what Hubble observed was that light from all distant galaxies is red-shifted and is so in ratio to it's distance from us. This implies that we live in an expanding universe. Of course, far away also means long ago, so...

@CGoldthorpe

5 жыл бұрын

@@MrBarryBurke STILL consider WHY. I understand what you are saying but whether the source is going away, or toward you the speed of light is supposed to be constant,

is possible make physical theory right and still same time right theory is mathematically wrong?

@En-of5oh

4 жыл бұрын

As mathematics is tool of physics, does mathematics always give correct calculations to our physical observations?

you know what the equation of Einstein are a good approximation arround the Earth is because the equation of maxwell dont variate a lot ....

My hypothesis that Dark Matter is not a weakly interactive massive particle (WIMP), but maybe is a deformation of space-time by which the curvature of space-time itself is the cause of the gravitational effect. Gravity is the consequence of the curvature of space-time when mass is present. It may be possible that the structure of space-time itself could be warped without the presence of mass. So, how did this warping occur? We believe this warping of space-time occurred during the extreme conditions present during inflation. Space-time has been shown to react like a fabric by warping, twisting, and propagating independent of mass. These properties have been proven with observations of gravitational lensing, frame dragging, and now gravitational waves. Fabrics can be stretched, pressured, and/or heated to the point of deformation. Such extreme conditions were all present during inflation, so it is plausible that space-time’s elastic nature could have hit its yield point and permanently deformed. Therefore, if gravity is the consequence of the warping of space-time, and fabrics can be permanently deformed, then a deformation could create a gravitational effect independent of mass. Thus, the unidentified dark "matter" that seems to be so elusive to modern science may not be matter at all but merely warped deformities causing gravitational effects. We have a prediction using gravitational lens mapping to prove Dark Matter isn’t a weakly interacting massive particle, but instead is a floating fixed pocket of warped geodesics in space-time geometry causing gravity wells.

@jasonsage1417

6 жыл бұрын

Interesting. Also check Out Electric Universe Theory, I don't buy all of their "historic guesses" but I think they are on to something, and I think sometimes they make bigger claims than are warranted... you'll see what I mean, you'll see where it has merit and where they are "reaching" - Check it out! :)

@cakemoss4664

6 жыл бұрын

I think you are postulating that Einstein's field equation is incomplete. Good luck with that. The baked-in warping of spacetime that you take to be the explanation for so-called dark matter would presumably be detectable from its effects on the passage of starlight. Perhaps you can check if this would be possible to find experimentally.

@YodaWhat

6 жыл бұрын

+Mark Lane -- Also, if the space warping suggested by Jason G is actually present, it might warp both to positive and negative curvature, aka Regions of Permanent Attraction *and* Regions of Permanent Repulsion, yes?

@Robert_McGarry_Poems

6 жыл бұрын

You just described string theory.

@Robert_McGarry_Poems

6 жыл бұрын

Anyway, the spooky action at a distance, entanglement, is where I believe the answer lies. Einstein-Rosen bridges are intriguing and could explain a lot.

Wouldn't the gravitational field be strongest around the sun.Its the most massive structure on our galaxy.But then how does light dispersion occur given the mass.

@stevetreloar6602

5 жыл бұрын

Are you 11 or 12? The gravitational field around the sun is not all that strong but still enough to bend the path of a photon, it is nowhere near the most massive object in our galaxy and photons once emitted in a vacuum have only one speed.

Bounce. try bouncing a ball and you may recognize that there is another gap. Can you tell me what it is?

Я ЗНАЮ, ВЫ откликнитесь - как вылечить рассеянный склероз - MS , пожалуйста напишите , заранее благодарен.... Читайте антропософию Р Штайнера.. Читайте антропософию Р Штайнера..

@stevetreloar6602

5 жыл бұрын

There is currently no cure for MS.

You know the equation of maxwell are not empiric cause every photon is particular ......

O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen 1 Timothy 6: 20--21

11.22 :)

@stevetreloar6602

5 жыл бұрын

Well spotted, girls have been proven to exist.

The more people think they know only proves how little they actually know. A chicken comes from an egg but you must have a chicken to get the egg. So goes the theory.

Inflation explains so many things that I think it's probably true ...me and my unqualified opinion kol

@frederickj.7136

5 жыл бұрын

@ John Morris... You are wise enough, unlike some others here, to understand the position and state of knowledge from which you speak, which was good enough for Socrates. Your opinion thus deserves anyone's respect. Keep respecting true expertise such as professor Steinhardt's. Cheers!

@robotaholic

5 жыл бұрын

@@frederickj.7136 aww, thanks! I'm smart enough to know that I have a lot to learn about everything LOL

This is extremely deceptive language here. Einstein had a theory about gravitation, and his theory of gravitation lead him to an _opinion_ about how to best apply his theory to cosmology (it's common, even for equations that are completely valid, to admit "non-physical" solutions, and so judgement on this matter is fairly routine, but it's just opinion, until it runs up against an observations constraint _beyond_ what the equation originally solved). In the case of the big bounce, the force providing the bounce doesn't even need to be gravity. It could be some whole new force, leaving Einstein's theory of gravitation exactly right, and fully complete (as a theory of gravity). Cosmology, however, would need to add this new force as a new idea. But let's not make that Einstein's problem, because it isn't the problem he set out to solve.

What if Universe dissolves in fourth spiritual dimension and then appears as new vibrations of creation energy ...

I don’t know how I ended up here but I was following all of it up until this video (probably 5th video I’ve watched) and now I am so confused

@gaoxiaen1

5 жыл бұрын

Feynman said, "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don't understand quantum mechanics." As a language teacher, I recommend i plus one. Watch/study more and you'll understand more of what you "learned" or believed/disbelied earlier. I say that we're 3-5 Einsteins away from interstellar travel. You may be the one, or inspire the one.

@teachermichaelmaalim6103

5 жыл бұрын

My Baby Sister. It is either his explanation is poor or your understanding is poor. Science is supposed to be done with the mouth shut but modern science is very talkative; that is why we hardly understand. If you want to understand, you will have to do the research yourself and do the writing yourself. Be prepared to face opposition.

@earlefrost5512

5 жыл бұрын

Uncalled for, sir or madam. She merely states she is confused - she didn't attack or deny the scientific method, or allude to any of the many insane consiracy theories so common these days. Cut her some slack and stop jumping to conclusions.

@earlefrost5512

5 жыл бұрын

Sorry you were attacked by intolerant KZread denzions - it happens even in the comments sections of Strictly Science, quite civilized videos such as this one. Please don't take it personally.

@teachermichaelmaalim6103

5 жыл бұрын

@Megan Mackey. UR cutesome

Anyone else notice how he conveniently failed to mention the cosmological constant, that was in Einsteins' equations? He never mentioned it. After that omissions, I was surprised he gave Hubble the credit for proving the universe is expanding. -- Anyone committing their lives to proving Einstein is ~all wrong? It will be a life-long endeavor? Guaranteed life-long pay check!

Debunked

didn't knew even Einstein could be wrong

@folterknecht1768

6 жыл бұрын

Even Einstein himself admitted to it ... .

@MrJdsenior

5 жыл бұрын

He thought he was once, with the universal constant.....turned out that that was RIGHT! Seriously, though, he didn't accept quantum physics, which it turns out, was OBVIOUSLY an error, so of course he could be wrong, and was, many times. It's just he was so DAMNED right sometimes, like relativity. ;-)

Listened to almost the end and had to check the date of the video lol bet he wishes he could go back and change his argument after Ligo detected the waves

How does this address the apparent fine-tuning we see?

The word 'Quantum' always has to make an appearance, as if it were gospel.

Six minutes of the elementary school review. Does it get better?

I don't buy the "big bounce" any more. I used to like the symmetry of it, but the observations seem to point in the direction of the "big rip", and the heat death. Sorry.

I think they were more understanding of the brain rather than the universe. They might have made better brain surgeons.

Change of M O

.Big gap? Maybe Einstein's theory is faulty.

This Total Bro just whip out atm “Mind the Gap/Yung’in lingo”Haha Pretty sure 2016 Every girl online posted pics or wanted a “thigh gap”? That lasted like 8 months max.

This tale wags the dog.

But einstein died befor hubble was online

@gokurocks9

5 жыл бұрын

Hubble died before Einstein

And many say my faith in Jesus is nuts?

@DWHalse

4 жыл бұрын

@Jan Berrios Ah ha..now you get prayed for Jan. Expect wierd things to happen. Thanks for reply!!

We are 'Pure Consciousness' having a material experiences. We think of something and we make it. Not sure why peeps are not taught that, I guess it's because you have to bring G*D into the equation, right?

Answers r a dime a dozen, its the questions that matter,

What if one day we get a picture of the Universe and find out that it looks exactly like the map of the earth ? ;P ?

eventually humans will get there the simplist answer is the right one

THEY GOT NO ANSWERS = ITS ALL GUESS WORK AND HOT AIR ??????

When you tell me the chances of inflation are one in a googleplex without telling me how you arrive at that number, I don't put much stock in the argument against inflation. You go on to say the prediction that dark matter will decay is testable, and say the theory of the higgs point to the vacuum being stable, but don't reconcile wit the fact that the universe is accelerating. How lame!

Em