*Ladyboy walks down the street in vietnam smoking a bong* Me: That's not what I meant by HIGH DRAG..

5:50 one dud, hit the ground and no explosion

@juanzanatta5247

Ай бұрын

Nobody is PERFECT...YOU DO!!???????? S T F U

You don't have to be accurate with a 750lb. hi-drag bomb....

Excellent. Thank you!

4:20 - "Run Charlie, run!"

I really enjoy the high drag bombs!!!

@gonorreascomunistas7942

4 жыл бұрын

Yes ... I just try to find somebody down there .... To receive the bomb : )

@Revivethefallen

Жыл бұрын

I think so too! There cool to watch.

@brandtbollers3183

Жыл бұрын

" Snake Eyes

Odds are certain that these airstrikes killed a lot of people on the ground but by the same token odds are also certain they didn't hit jack shit. The NVA and Viet Cong were so well adapt to moving through the jungle that by the time photos were taken by recce aircraft, missions were planned, fighter jets were dispatched and the area was bombed the NVA and VC were long to hell and gone! About the only thing that was killed were insects and animals.

@cedarbay3994

6 жыл бұрын

That was true in the South but once we finally started using B-52s in the North during Operation Linebacker in late '72 the enemy was devastated That is what brought them to Paris for the peace accords

@phayzyre1052

6 жыл бұрын

Cedar Bay, that was precisely the case! Thankfully Nixon FINALLY lifted those idiotic bombing restrictions and in one week's time in late 1972 the US military did more to destroy North Vietnam's fighting capability than in the entire 7 years before. From 1965 to 1972 most of what the USAF, USMC and US Navy did was waste tons of ordinance on targets of either questionable or negligible value while targets that could've been (and should've been) knocked out were off limits. Of course during that period they bombed big targets like bridges but other targets like SAM sites couldn't be touched until AFTER they became operational. That was about the stupidest thing ever and the blame for that can be laid at the feet of Mr. Lyndon Johnson. Of course he did not start the Vietnam war nor did he finish it but his megalomaniac inept clueless leadership caused more senseless unnecessary deaths than anything else. When you go to war you go to war to win and not dilly-dally or tap dance around like some indecisive chicken shit coward!

@TheJMascis666

6 жыл бұрын

Phayzyre105 if Johnson had done what you suggested when he did he probably would have ended up in a direct confrontation with China and or the Soviet Union.

@TheJMascis666

6 жыл бұрын

Don't take this the wrong way because I agree with a lot of what you say, but Johnson left the White House in January 1969 so he most didn't play "tiddlywinks between 1965 to 1972". Also the political situation was very different by 1972 during the LBJ era, but I do wonder what had happened if Rolling Thunder had been more like Linebacker. Johnson was handed a problem in Vietnam that had been mismanaged by others pretty much since the end of the second world war, he then tried to protect an ally which was on its knees from an aggressive invading neighbour, he tried to keep the death toll down by avoiding a confrontation with China / Soviet Union which would have made the Vietnam conflict look like chicken feed in comparison. He made a lot of mistakes, but he doesn''t deserve the bad press he gets and I have to disagree with many of your disparaging remarks about him.

@Sokol10

3 жыл бұрын

@@cedarbay3994 '72 Paris "peace accords" that result advantages for North Vietnam, USA get their POW's back an can go home "with honor", giving a F*** for SVN.

To provide supporting fires for ground forces where there is no mortar or artillery coverage. Or to strike facilities/troop concentrations found by (air)reconnaissance. Pretty good! Greetings, Jeff

"Incendi-Gel"

@icarustanovic3097

6 жыл бұрын

Jamie Shields He doesn't want to be rude and say 'You see, we bomb them with Napalm'.

@IronPhysik

4 жыл бұрын

@@icarustanovic3097 because it isnt napalm during vietnam the USAF switched the mixture up. Napalm means a mixture of gasoline, Napthen acid and Palmitin Acid. the new Mixture is Gas and a styrofoam based thickener, it also had etal powder in it to improve reactivity. this was named incendigel, because it lacks the chemical to be called napalm

@ferrallderrall6588

2 жыл бұрын

@@IronPhysik holy smart right there lol

It's sad what the USA did to the people of Vietnam.

Pilots loved cluster bombs instead of the dumb 750 bombs

"Incendie-gel"... Lol. Yeah that will make napalm sound less hellish to the media.

@IronPhysik

4 жыл бұрын

because it isnt napalm during vietnam the USAF switched the mixture up. Napalm means a mixture of gasoline, Napthen acid and Palmitin Acid. the new Mixture is Gas and a styrofoam based thickener, it also had metal powder in it to improve reactivity. This was named incendigel, because it lacks the chemical to be called napalm. lastly, this was not meant for anyone outside the USAF. as you can see at the start of the video "for authorized personell only"

LBJ should have let the phantoms strike the command posts and enemy air fields, instead of calling them the day before to warn the enemy of where and when the phantoms would be bombing!

Cowardly pilots dropping bombs on civilians. Very American.

@ferrallderrall6588

2 жыл бұрын

Russian armed civilians but call it what ya want

@notinterested6499

2 жыл бұрын

@@ferrallderrall6588 The majority of those killed in Vietnam (and Laos and Cambodia) were civilians, but the ones who fought French and US imperialism were correct too. Also, the arms were from China too, not just the Soviet Union.

@notinterested6499

2 жыл бұрын

And captured French & American weapons too.

@ferrallderrall6588

2 жыл бұрын

@@notinterested6499 point being ther were enough guns to go around I lil ol svn

@anthonyfoutch3152

Жыл бұрын

both sides killed civilians.

I guess we must be authorized personnel.😄

All that hardware and ordinance, an authoritative military narration.....and they still lost....

@CHARLESA-km5gz

5 жыл бұрын

Crazy eh---Did realize after watching Ken Burns 10 part documentary that you would have to kill everyone to win that war. They were all right losing 10/20/30:1 against us-- It was one big meat grinder!!!

@bobtis

4 жыл бұрын

@@CHARLESA-km5gz LBJ and McNamara never understood this. Never understood these people. They would have fought till 1985. They were ready to go that far. If China and the USSR stopped supplying them that would have ended it.

@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii

3 жыл бұрын

Politically, not by militarily

@kekistanimememan170

3 жыл бұрын

@@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii withdrawal is still losing.

@jettsetter7

3 жыл бұрын

@@kekistanimememan170 the military didn’t lose the war. The politicians in DC lost the war. That’s a fact.

Where is that MOAB? Has anyone seen it? :)

Yeaahhhh cluster bomb lovellyyyy

Remember: inflated number of enemy dead after BDA reports called in.

8:13 How to use Aim-9😆

6:43 lucky for them

3:00

this is what i think of when i hear the song "Testify" by Rage Against The Machine

空襲の動画を見ると民間人に捕まったパイロットがリンチされる理由がよく分かる

G R E A T M E N

CALL THE COPS-THAT'S RIGHT, IT'S THE COPS DOING THE BOMBING.

@anthonyfoutch3152

Жыл бұрын

what lost the war was 2 camera shots. When the young girl ran naked from the napalm bomb and when the ARVN general blew the guys brains out on film. Those 2 shots lost the war,

@sashadala346

Жыл бұрын

@@anthonyfoutch3152 Eight million tons of bombs dropped on Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in 15 years. That may have had something to do with it too.

There is a lot of bombs…oh yea…finally, they loose the war

When the pilot strafes the positions on the beach the narrator claims 12 enemy killed. Are you sure? Because I'm gonna guess zero. Sums up "kill count" in Vietnam.

@schoolssection

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, who survived to do the counting?

Для чего бомбили хижины и деревни, настраивали северных против себя? 0:55 эскадрилья сбросила напалм.

@MrBen527

8 жыл бұрын

+A10 I like your avatar russian.

@user-ze8vt3dt8k

Жыл бұрын

Я на тех кадрах никакой деревни не вижу.

HEAVEN WARS 5

It's napalm

Unbelievable how US with such amount of modern warfare humiliatingly lost the war. US was never a super power Vietnamese proved it.

@TheTrueAdept

3 жыл бұрын

Nope, the war simply proved that war has to have a PR component at all times to allow the political will to keep flowing. Afghanistan would prove to become the Soviet's version of Vietnam in the 1980s.

@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii

3 жыл бұрын

How can you call it a humiliating loss when they hardly lost any battles and scored a staggeringly high kill death ratio. It was apolitical defeat yes but if the US population agreed with the war it would basically have been genocide at that point

@tahashah4168

3 жыл бұрын

@@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii destroyed 2/3 of Vietnam forest killed hundreds of thousands of people childrens men women old young just to stop Vietnam from becoming communist but still ended up leaving them alone and late it became a communist country. If death ratio is the manner to decide who won the war then US will not be leaving afghanistan like this after 20 years in afghanistan they are leaving with the permission of taliban is this is a super power country they started the war in afghanistan to destroyed taliban from governing but still they are leaving with talibans in control of 60% of territory. Isn't this is a humiliation???

@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii

3 жыл бұрын

@@tahashah4168 what? I don’t think you understand any of the concepts you’ve mentioned. The taliban don’t control 60% of anything, that’s just false. The US is still there to create stability (which is really just springing up a puppet state) and is very successfully killing terrorists. The middle eastern wars are designed to never send, it’s called the military industrial complex. My point about Vietnam is that it wasn’t a military defeat, but a political one. They never invaded North Vietnam, nor did they try, but the north tried multiple invasions on the south, all failing (until the US left). The North was never able to launch a successful military campaign against the US in that war that ended in a military victory for Vietnam, only a propaganda one.

@tahashah4168

3 жыл бұрын

@@FirstNameLastName-qx8ii winning or losing a war depends on the result if the end result is not in your favour then you are a loser that is my point. US didn't accomplished it's objectives in vietnam neither in afghanistan.

Any reports on innocent civilians?

@Radionut

7 жыл бұрын

andy mayor there were no innocent civilians in Vietnam they were all back into the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army

@inertiaforce7846

6 жыл бұрын

Vietnam Toi yeu I am sorry for what America did to your country. At least you won the war in the end and kicked the americans out. The war was completely fabricated and unncessary, just like the Iraq war. Unbelieveable. And America is starting the same garbage in the middle east. It took Russia's military forces to stop America's bullshit in the middle east also.

@ladywinter6592

6 жыл бұрын

inertiaforce Sorry for what? For fighting against communism? This plague destroy alot country's in the world.

@inertiaforce7846

6 жыл бұрын

David J. Wilhelm The Americans destroyed Vietnam during the Vietnam war worse than any communism could have done. 3 million Vietnamese died for absolutely nothing. The Americans left and communism took over anyway. So if communism was so bad how come it was the Americans who killed three million Vietnamese not the communists?

@TheJMascis666

6 жыл бұрын

andy mayor yeah the VC killed loads.

“Enemy support structures” = family homes with shaking children huddled with their terrified parents.

@louisroth3622

2 ай бұрын

You have no idea what your talking about!

I might be a coward, but I just can't watch this Horror and Terror.

IYAAYAS

@MrTonyharrell

4 жыл бұрын

bbfrankie I am shit sir 😂😂😂😎

Still defeated by Vietnamese. USA superpower? HAHAHAHAHAAHAHA

@halova962

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah after the victory. Vietnam people get embargo and eat animal food until US lift it off until 1994 . I'm from Vietnam and that is true af.

@nizloc4118

3 жыл бұрын

Vietnamese were defeated by Vietnamese.... not Americans Not sure why people always miss that.... America left with 2 countries still in place.... 2 years later it changed

@frankrizzo4460

2 жыл бұрын

God bless our great republic and all who served in this war. We the people are forever grateful for your service 🙏🇺🇸

@Spy76761

Жыл бұрын

@@nizloc4118 Explanation It's ridiculous Yankee😆

@Spy76761

Жыл бұрын

@@nizloc4118 So at that time American soldiers came to Vietnam just for tourism? 🥱