It isnt Far-Right, it's just common sense.

@MarcusCactus

6 ай бұрын

It is not even Right, let alone Far Right. It is the conjunction of Lay Left with Lay Right. Away with religion!

Wilders is not "far right", he is simply an average Dutchman. Historically there is nothing far right is his ideas and as far as most people in Holland were concerned, and for that matter throughout Europe, the sentiments are the same.

So sick of this Far right media rubbish. To want your county back is not a far right thing .

@nadir8804

6 ай бұрын

It's just right by far !

@MarcusCactus

6 ай бұрын

I am considered far left. I prolote communism (Trotski version). I promote the interdiction of fortune. I promote laicity (free individual beliefs, but anticlergy: antijudaism, anticlericalism, anti-islamism). I promote liberation of the minds. I favour PVV. Let me tell you, it is definitely not "right" nor even "extreme".

He's not far right! Hopefully more people will recognize that he's a voice of reason. His policies could be a catalyst for global reform.

He’s not far right. He just wants to preserve Dutch culture

Mohammad laughed when muslim said " religion of peace "

He isn't Far-Right, he's a patriot looking after the people and he will keep the country safe.

Stop calling him far right for being just right

Why do you call a left of center socialist party with an anti immigration policy far right AFP? What is your motive for being so wrong and disingenuous?

@nicholaslindsay6456

6 ай бұрын

Its ironic that "Far right" is intended as a derogatory term by those who are far wrong

@beepboopbeepp

6 ай бұрын

Far right doesnt hold any meaning anymore. I wish they would instead point out political leanings there are many so called "far right" that hold different policies they dont all fit in the same box

He is not far right!!! He is a patriot looking after the citizens of his country.

@handysmith-kv1tc

5 ай бұрын

Gee..........what a novel idea! ......GL my Dutch cousins!

Far right firebrand ? Sounds like an insult to us Dutch. 70% of Dutch voters voted for centre-right and far right parties that all had some anti-immigration platform - it is therefore undemocratic to demand that immigration isn't restricted.

Its the poor and powerless who suffer the most negative impacts of these secretive flooding in of people

Geerd Wilders is the best for the Netherlands! Congratulations! 😺👍😎💪💙🍀💙🍀💙🍀💙🍀💙🐺

He isn't Far Right. The far left media should start seeing the world as it is. Wanting the good a country has is Conservative. Not Far Right.

he isn't Far Right, he's just right.

No shock waves in Ireland as not a peep from the national broadcaster🙃

@johnohara197

6 ай бұрын

Well that's typical of the Republic of Ireland and it's national broadcaster 'RTE', luckily it was reported in Northern Ireland, and it's all over social media! Congratulations to the Dutch voters they exercised their democratic right!

@daanloco7200

6 ай бұрын

I heard about that lunatic mayor, who wanted protesters to be shot in the head!!! Is he in jail or deported now? GEERTJE WILDERS ❤❤❤

@MarriedToTheKGB

6 ай бұрын

i wonder why hmmmmm

Geert Wilders is so caring, he feels for his country, every Dutchman should help him make their country Holland once again, before it's too late. Let's face it, there is no peace coming from "religion of peace"

"Islam to a man is like rabies to a dog." Winston Churchill

No citizens ship for muslim Follow the path👣 of Gulf countries😢

He's a true patriot who cares about his country culture and people, a great leader.👍👍👍

Far right? Bullshit, he's a patriot, not an extremist.

Beret is absolutely right because of the following. THE idea of perpetual war between Muslims and non-Muslims is held by jihadists who commit acts of terrorism in the name of jihad. A corollary to this idea is the concept of Dar Al-Islam (Land of Islam) and Dar Al-Harb (Land of War). In the jihadists’ mind, Dar Al- Islam refers to a land ruled by a Muslim ruler and the Shari’ah is held as the rule of the land. In contrast, a land is considered as Dar Al-Harb when it is ruled by non-Muslim or when the Shari’ah is not recognised as the rule of the land. Admittedly, the concept of Dar Al-Islam and Dar Al-Harb has its roots in the works of the classical scholars, which often become the source of reference for jihadists. According to jihadists, however, the use of Dar Al-Harb as a terminology to describe non-Muslim land by classical Muslim scholars suggests that all such lands should be considered as at war until they come under the rule of Dar Al-Islam. Jihadists’ wholesale application of the concept in today’s context without recognising it as time-bound, and their juxtaposition of the concept and the idea of jihad as a perpetual war against non-Muslims, strengthen their binary perspective of “either you are with us or against us”. This unfortunately contributes to painting Islam as a simplistic religion that sees “others” with hostility.

@ddonchiji

6 ай бұрын

😂. This joke made my day.

@chriskappert1365

6 ай бұрын

There is only ONE quoran , so there are only muslims ..........! 😮

Natuurlijk! Het is geen kwestie van armhoed, het is een kwestie van samenleving. Het is geen kwestie van ras, het is een kwestie van kultuur, van civilisatie tegen barbariteit.

Multiculturalism ONLY ever works where ALL parties concerned agree to live together in peace and recognize the rights of others to exist and that they can believe what they choose to believe and have basic human rights such as education for all etc. Islam stands out as a politico- religio ideology that does not do that. Hence this is why there is social turmoil in virtually any country where the islamics are in significant numbers. I challenge anyone to show me an islamic country that exists peacefully and adheres to human rights. Taliban being a prime example of applied islamism.

"Far-right firebrand Wilders" your mother is far-right.

NO No No Not Far Right - Just Right.

Far right?

They took my job

Rather far right some of the time than far wrong most of the time. As Elon Musk would say GFY.

I think the actual indigenous people have a right to their country. The left agrees except when the indigenous people are white. When the indigenous people live in the stone age, have no real law, or borders, or institutions, then they benefit by civilized people making proper use of the resources of the area and making wilderness into a country. Such things elevate the stone age people, like the American Indians. This is not to ignore atrocities nor crimes nor evil nor violence, but it is a fact, stone age civilizations are not superior to more evolved and advanced societies, generally. There are exceptions, the Nazis, the democrat party, and other murderous elements found in current society which degrade humanity, but the stone age peoples need civilizing as do the left. In fact, the left and the stone age people have cheap human life as a rule. Thus it is that the culture of a society is what matters. Putin, or Aztecs, or Nazis or democrats all have or are imbued with a culture of death. They all kill. So, one can see the Moslems do not fit into normal European or western cultures. They are essentially stone age by religion, or more aptly cult. One can see the odd things in South Africa as well. A land basically empty until developed, once developed large in migration occurred of people not native to the location. They were primitive people migrating into a culture that did not fit their own. Friction ensued, odd laws developed, in the end it all came tumbling down, what was said to be race was actually culture. So, no electricity anymore, the system breaks down. Cultural clash is what happened. Sure racism is a thing, but it is not limited to one race or color, it exists even in political parties, like the democrats, the most racist people on earth. They hate while people and the white people in that party hate themselves.

imagine we go for Asylum living in a muslim country and we want that country to turn in a christen country.What do you think will happen. im not right or left but we have laws and we don't bend them for people who wants to live here.

OH WELL

Not far right. That is a beatup. Leave democracy and the wishes of the population to work properly please.

What about all the Indonesian descent people?

If it's far right to have bodyguards for over a decade because muslims can't stand criticism? That's not far right, he's got a very good point there.

Dutch former anti-Muslim politician converts to Islam Joram van Klaveren is the second ex-PVV politician to convert.

Its always interesting once refugees or asylum seekers themselves become nationals lets say lived there for 30+ years they also become anti immigration often or at least skeptical.

Biased

You dorealize if Israel loses…rest of world will circum to Islam….uk don’t know how many fighting men you imported…armies?