Brilliant as always!

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Thank you very much!! Thanks for being here.

It's worth stating that slowing to 25% is pretty extreme. And optimistic! I wouldn't normally recommend less than 50% - and your results will tend to be better, too.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much for watching. Yes, that's true that only slowing to 50% will yield better results, but it should be noted that the same artefacts will still be present. We deliberately slowed our shots to 25% to make the demonstration more obvious. Two things to consider: - There are lot's of scenarios where slowing to 1/4 speed would not be considered extreme. For example action sports, or speed ramping to 0%. - You might already be aware, but for the benefit of others... Slowing by integer factors (i.e. 50%, 33%, 25%, 20%...) will often achieve better results than non-integer factors. Great to have you here Jonathan. Thanks!

@reyvaz2951

Жыл бұрын

your are right, her intentions might be to show, what happens if we go to extreme, but thanks for pointing that out.

Excellent summary on optical flow use -- confirms what I have discovered empirically, but it's nice to know I haven't missed anything. Subbed.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks for commenting.

Excellent 👌👌👌👌

This channel is incredible!

@team2films

11 ай бұрын

So pleased you love it, thank you!

Hi from Puerto Rico, this lady always find the way, for me to learn something new, even if alredy know about it and keep my attention, Thanks for your tips.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Thanks so much. Glad the videos are helpful.

Very cool, thank you!

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Thank you, Glad you liked it!

Well explained. For shots with visual artifacts you can also try "Motion Estimation > Speed Warp". It can be much slower to render because it's more computationally intensive, but the results are usually much better.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing! I like to keep 'Smart Cache' turned on to improve playback.

Thanks for this explainer video! I'd use it more for dramatic/creative.dream like effect rather than viable slow mo but in any case, super helpful to know about.

@team2films

9 ай бұрын

That's a great use case too. Thanks for watching and commenting.

So good thanks a lot

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

You are most welcome.

More content!! This is all gold, cant wait for the paid course to release

@team2films

10 ай бұрын

Thanks Spencer, we're hard at work on it and hope to have it ready later in the year. We'll keep everyone posted with the progress.

Try combining optical flow and speed warp. It will add missing frame rates and give super smooth, slow motion. The downside is that it took longer to render (even with render in place)

@team2films

3 ай бұрын

Great tip. Thanks :)

thx😘

@team2films

5 ай бұрын

You're welcome!

I also have used this combined with speed warp to put a video in a desired frame rate (a 23.97 fps to 30fps timeline)

@team2films

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, that’s a good way of eliminating stuttering motion on frame rate conversions. When you say ‘this’ what exactly are you referring to?

First✌🏻

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

👏🏻 Appreciate you watching, thank you!

Have used optical flow. it's not as smooth. Next vidoe clip i'll change it to 60fps. make it whole lot easier, thx for the tips. like it.

@team2films

4 ай бұрын

You are welcome.

Would adding slight additional motion blur help hide the artifacts? Mind you I’m an amateur, so if that’s a silly question, you know why. Thanks for the tutorial, just what I needed.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Hmmm, that's a good thought, but sadly I would have to say no, I doubt it would be enough to mask the artefacts. Or perhaps it would add visual issues of its own. Thanks for watching. Great to have you here.

Hi, when I reduce my 4k videos with SpeedWarp to approx. 25% slowmo, the rendering time increases from approx. 20s (opticalflow only) to over 5 min. Unfortunately I have not found a single test that compares the GPU's with each other in relation to SpeedWarp and gives real output times. Does anyone knows of a current test?

@team2films

4 ай бұрын

Speedwarp is VERY processor intensive. Optical flow (without speed warp) plays back in real time on our M1. I believe this timeline is set to 1920x1080 though.

like can we convert 24fps to 60 in davinci without altering video speed?

@team2films

7 ай бұрын

Yes, it's possible. Place your 24fps in a 60fps timeline. By default Resolve will use the Nearest frame mode for the frame rate conversion. If you want it to have the appearance of 60fps playback, change retime process to optical flow and motion estimation to Speed Warp for the best possible frame interpolation. Be cautious though, remember you are trying to make more from less.

How can I blur a video shot at a high exposure speed and remove the strobing effect?

@team2films

4 ай бұрын

Try the Motion Blur effect in the colour page.

@poletkolibri

4 ай бұрын

@@team2films thanks

What if we shot in 60fps and we're just slowing down 50% to 30fps on a 30fps timeline. Then there shouldn't be any need for Optical Flow, correct? Will the 'nearest' setting just drop every other frame and deliver the smoothest slow motion possible?

@team2films

3 ай бұрын

Nearest will deliver EVERY frame when running 60fps at 30fps (50%) in a 30fps timeline. If you were running 60fps at 60fps (100%) in a 30fps timeline then it would deliver every other frame. Hope that helps.

Changing the Motion Estimation to Speed Warp will help, but, slowing down to 25% is extreme.

@team2films

Жыл бұрын

Heya Richard, great suggestion! Thanks so much for watching :)

@richardsontwain6283

Жыл бұрын

@@team2films you're welcome. you will need to cache as it's heavy on the system.

@kcoppa

5 ай бұрын

Speed warp works fast on nvidia gpu with rt cores. I have not tried it on a mac m chip though