ISRAEL V IRAN INDIA V PAKISTAN

@sakatagintoki3803

7 жыл бұрын

There was India vs pakistan 4 times already and results are in wiki.

@robertadema771

7 жыл бұрын

israel, top 5 armies of the world, iran, somewhere down the shitter armies of the world. That's like saying United States vs Mexico

@robertadema771

7 жыл бұрын

Actually, 12-13 times more people fit for service, but only 3 times more trained soldiers and then 3 times more reserve. Israel however has 80% more tanks and 50% more planes, most of them more modern. It would be impossible for iran to devise any form of attack without ground or air superiority. This is without even considering the difference in training level and auxiliary technology between Israel and Iran. Any military conflict would end quickly, but obviously the Israely army could never occupy the country due to the lack of numbers on their side.

@SrGurkman

7 жыл бұрын

Sparky Malarky Israel and Iran don't share a land border and have to go thru straits and Suez to reach each other by sea so he'll have to model diplomacy/alliances to some degree, something he generally avoids.

@Jinseual

7 жыл бұрын

A war with Israel vrs Iran would be the most unlikely scenario. The only chance they got was if Iran sent troops to Syria or Lebanon to occupy Golan Heights. Note that Syria failed to take the Golan Heights from Israel in 1973 despite overwhelming numeral superiority. After all these years Israeli equipment has been upgraded while Syria and Iran are still using older equipment in which the technological superiority between them has widened. One reason why this scenario is very unlikely is because a huge Iranian and Syrian army would be more of a threat to Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Iran and Syria had supported groups that tried to overthrow the Jordanian monarchy in the past. Relationships between the Saudis and Iran had always been low ,hence, the Saudis and Jordanians would feel more threatened than Israel and would act in trying to prevent the build up in the first place.

Very accurate compared to other comparison videos. I've seen many weapon system or country's military comparison videos, but most of them only show raw numbers. Your video actually shows multiple aspects and show that it's not easy to say which aircraft is better.

@trumanhw

2 жыл бұрын

How do you know? Are you assuming DCS is accurate ? Where Su-57 are "alien tech" ? We just don't know that. When it comes to stealth, everyone is guessing. We have Red Flat reports of ROOKIES getting 78:1 kill ratios (& saving veterans). No? Red Flag is supposed to be "most realistic" in sim. (and Gripens can hold their own). Seems like Rafale can [maintain] a good positioning once attained on an F22. But we just don't know what the actual specs of missiles & stealth are as they're updated.

@trumanhw

2 жыл бұрын

​@Apsoy Pike Ha, I hadn't read your reply when I wrote mine; it's validating to see someone who's heard similar stories; Perhaps Binkov will use Red Flag (and perhaps data once available from Russia vs Ukraine (+ partial US)) may be incorporated into ... _part 3, - FIGHT_

@jamison884

Жыл бұрын

​@@trumanhw Binkov's part 2 essentially ignored the F-35 stealth advantage. Ground radar may help guide the Su-35's towards the F-35s, but a faint radar contact doesn't mean they will magically be able to gain a strong enough radar signal to lock onto them at maximum Fox-3 range; they would need to get much closer and well into the AIM-120D's range before they would be able to acquire a missile lock (and that's not even factoring in F-35 jamming efforts). Then he also ignored the F-35 towed decoy in part 2 (but not part 1?) along with all indications of the F-35 having exceptional above-average electronic warfare capabilities. He also states it's very expensive, but since he made this video it has come way down in per unit costs due to 14 countries (and growing) placing orders, to the point a true gen. 5 multirole jet is on par with or cheaper than the costs of some NATO gen. 4 fighters. Given Russia's terrible performance in Ukraine, where the rare Su-27 and Mig-29 UA fighters are able to down various Russian jets including Su-35s, in addition to Russia being unable to gain any semblance of air superiority even with a large numerical advantage in the skies and a massive investment in advanced mobile and long range SAM systems, the lack of Russia pilot training quality and hours, plus poorly maintained equipment, and an overstatement of Russian capabilities all appear to show the true picture. The F-35 has only improved in reputation since this video was made (such as the pilot reports in Red Flag for several years now, and F-35 pilots stating they would want the F-35 in actual combat scenarios above all other available jets for "unspecified/classified" reasons), while the Russian air force has suffered a severe downgrade in reputation and apparent capabilities.

honestly you put so much effort to make these videos possible. I envy you for your time and work! keep it up

I'd be interested to know how you'd assess the performance of the Eurofighter Typhoon relative to the F-35 and SU-35

F-35 for WIN

@firebird4491

7 жыл бұрын

Ja Ich will want it for mein Anschluss of Europa.

@firebird4491

7 жыл бұрын

PremiumPlusReviews du will now go to camp on train

@penamuuri6767

7 жыл бұрын

and how many su-35 you can get price of a one f-35, it's not so ftw any more isn't it.

@robertmoore5002

7 жыл бұрын

you can get 1 su-35 and parts.. 75mil vs 102 mil isn't much of a difference..

@penamuuri6767

7 жыл бұрын

F-35A: $102.1 million/jet F-35B: $131.6 million/jet F-35C: $132.2 million/jet su-35 Unit cost US$40 million to $65 million

North Korea vs South Korea next, pls

@EtheralFusion

7 жыл бұрын

If no nukes are involved, North Korea would lose very, very quickly. They're still using second generation tanks, while South Korea has the capacity to build automated defenses and modern armor.

@marcelldavis4043

7 жыл бұрын

NK has some newer tanks now, though not to be compared to a K2, but could challenge an K1/A1, they have more or less modern armor, and a 125mm gun

@DerBurner1709

7 жыл бұрын

Easy Win South Korea. Cold War is over, communist soviet union has fallen, so communist north korea has no import friends anymore. their whole army has no new equipment anymore and everything is completly outdated. north korea will fall sooner or later

@giwrgos1987100

7 жыл бұрын

DerBurner1709 somewhat communist china is a thing but south Korea is going to win either way also for the scenarios he does not allow nukes allies and morale

@Duke_of_Lorraine

7 жыл бұрын

If only conventional weapons are allowed... South Korea only needs to load catapults with bags of rice to make half the north korean army desert. And they can steamroll them. Also I guess we'd have to count the US troops present on the territory since they'd be there, which would push the scales even further in favor of SK. Now if you have an all-out-war with allies and whatnot (still no nukes)... SK would get the help of Japan and the US. NK now... I just cannot see China entering a war against the US to bailout NK from its leader's stupidity. It's just not an option. That would leave NK alone vs among others the USA. As for nukes... NK can nuke Seoul. I don't think their IBCMs are ready. If they use the nuclear bomb, then... if the US retaliate with nukes that would easily turn NK into a wasteland. There is no way NK can win.

You incorrectly assumed that Su-35 pilots were sober.

@vladimirakopyan4088

6 жыл бұрын

If they were drunk, they wouldn't loose any planes!

@numap4701

6 жыл бұрын

jarosluw cholewinski: How would your Wooden Polock head know? Get lost moron

@numap4701

6 жыл бұрын

guillermo moreno: Go dry your back Shit Head

@MatthewsGamingZone

6 жыл бұрын

Jarosław Cholewiński haha you stupid commie

@user-ov2yt9xh3s

6 жыл бұрын

wow, great polish army! LOL, take more urkainians and return western part of your country which was a gift from Soviet Union

Could you do this same analogy with the F22 Raptor vs SU-35?

@tonygreene81able

5 жыл бұрын

Bruh Raptor would take out a half dozen SU35's. You would be asking too much of SU35. They do exercise of 6 F15's vs Raptor and often they get completely eliminated.

@danchoen3847

5 жыл бұрын

The raptor is a way more advanced aircraft then the f-35 and it's actually designed as a dogfighter so against them the su-35 doesn't stand a real chance

@boogeh3630

4 жыл бұрын

I think he means a russian analogy where facts do not get in the way of creative writing.

@james_bam11

4 жыл бұрын

@@danchoen3847 yeah? Go check the dog fight between Eurofighter typhoon vs F22 Raptor

@EEEEEEE354

3 жыл бұрын

@@james_bam11 Yes, in WVR combat it came out equal. At BVR the F-22 would slaughter the typhoon. Don't conflate a dogfight scenario with actual real world combat where BVR is the main thing.

PACIFIC OCEAN VERSUS ATLANTIC OCEAN

@danchoen3847

5 жыл бұрын

Not even a competition the Pacific wins every time

@aidenmcknight2884

4 жыл бұрын

@@danchoen3847 nah m8, Atlantic could have a chance with help from artic

@danchoen3847

4 жыл бұрын

@@aidenmcknight2884 Arctic is a bitch boy with credentials

@at1512

4 жыл бұрын

@@danchoen3847 Nah b half the pacific ocean is filled with plastic who wants to swim in that.

CBG consisting of: 2x Nimitz, 3x Virginia, 5x Ticonderoga and 5x Arleigh Burke vs PLAAN South Sea Fleet Fleet vs Fleet in open ocean, no external factors

One of the few intelligent and fair evaluations I have seen on the web. My hat goes off to Binkov's, well done.

well done video. easily the best one ive seen, especially with a comparison.

So, a multi billion disaster project of F35, and they can only fly mach 1.6... Really? And that's supposed to replace a.o. the F16?

@KiingOfKombat

7 жыл бұрын

yeah but they can do that with full combat load whereas f16 cant do close to its top speed with its full combat load.

@reillybrangan2182

7 жыл бұрын

F-16: cant supercruise no stealth minimal load capability limited sensor fusion short range relies on external fuel tanks difficulty reaching top speed with combat load Phased Array Radar high wing load limiting the carry capacity of outer wing pylons F-35 can super cruise has stealth has a huge 18,000 lb load capability when carrying external mounts, and a capability to carry 8,000 lbs internally with stealth ability to super cruise with full internal combat load whilst retaining full aerodynamic performance DAS (distributed aperture system, enables a 360 degree infrared image which is analysed by on board computers to detect aircraft, missile launches and other threats whilst retaining the ability to slew sensors via pilot head alignment meaning that a pilot can see a SAM sight launch a missile, look at it, and slew all of his sensors on to it enabling him to eliminate it quickly) AESA (active electronically scanned array radar) enables tracking of 120 + targets simultaneously whilst also enabling high resolution radar image maps of target sites for all weather precision strike capability along with jamming capabilities and passive tracking for use when remaining in stealth) lifting body design reducing wing load and enabling more load baring capability for outer wing pylons Sensor Fusion, enables the F-35 to effectively go into a combat environment without weapons providing targeting solutions to weapons on board other aircraft/navy vessels or SAM sights, meaning that the F-35 can call weapons onto a target without firing any of its own. another capability of this is group formations of F-35's with only one members radar turned on and having that information shared among the formation, enabling concealment of formation size. if this scenario were to take place with two escort F-35's loading AA weapons externally, results would be different see image: www.google.com.au/search?q=F-35+internal+load&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKrsiM_PPRAhXGgrwKHaAzDQ0QsAQIGg&biw=2560&bih=1334#imgrc=uMWA4snv50UXjM: these along with many other features make the F-35 superior to the F-16 in every way *excluding stealth* with stealth being an added benefit. in other words, stealth is the least important difference between the F-35 and the F-16

@festol1

7 жыл бұрын

Lockheed placed advertisement detected.

@RapperFlo

7 жыл бұрын

Yes because Lockheed Martin would clearly advertise their plane to random youtubers because thats their main market for multi-million dollar defense technology

@reillybrangan2182

7 жыл бұрын

RapperFlo How did you know....

So the moral of the story is that the F 35 needs either a. an escort, or B, the ablity to carry more payload. Excellent analysis binkov

@Tirak117

7 жыл бұрын

jim volkert actually I do take issue with the fact that in these scenarios, he did not take into account the external stowage on the escort part of the flight. if it were assumed that stealth would not get you close enough to engage the defenders, a long range saturation attack, using the stealth configuration f35s for targeting, would overwhelm the defenders.

@stupidburp

7 жыл бұрын

Degrading your own stealth by carrying external stores when there is still full ground and air defenses does not seem like a good idea. Even if used in combination with clean configured allies.

@Tirak117

7 жыл бұрын

The advantage of this approach would be you could hang back and use the greater range of the AIM-120D, you would never get close to the ground defenses, as their only role would be to intercept air defenders. By hanging back and emitting, making tons of background noise, they draw the defender in, while masking any low signatures provided by the 'scout' element, then cut their loud jamming and start going with smart jamming to mix up the confusion and make it so they're not vulnerable to a home on jam shot, firing at maximum range on passive, while the further forward F-35s run the targeting links. The Ds never go active, so the RWR never lights up, they're fired from beyond IRST launch detection, and they're guided in the whole way giving them a high Pk, and minimizing the odds that the SU-35s manuver to avoid being hit, because they don't know they're fired on. The alternative of course being, constant random course correction, but that interferes with detection and reduces closure rate, which is one of the advantages the SU-35 has.

@3rdGenGuy

7 жыл бұрын

considering all f35s will be escorted by F22s i'd say any Russian target is fucked. it's almost as if they were designed to complement each other. same setup as the F16s and F15s f16 take out ground targets F15s take out air targets.

@stupidburp

7 жыл бұрын

It is unrealistic to assume that F-22 would be available to escort all F-35. There are less than 200 F-22 built in the world and there will be thousands of F-35 in the USAF inventory alone plus hundreds more in other US services and hundreds more used by allies. There simply are not enough of them to provide coverage to more than a small fraction of the F-35s and none are being built.

A very good analysis, good job! I just found your channel today and I'm really liking the content, looking forward to more!

Really really good video. I love your animations and production value. The comparison is super unbiased and objective. Good stuff

F- 35 will have "sidekicks" and be able to cary 6 missiles now. That's a big deal. F-35 will be dominant with enough missiles.

@drewfierman3834

3 жыл бұрын

Very true

@Jawshuah

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah 6 missiles changed everything.

@jordandally765

2 жыл бұрын

Also there’s das which provide approx. 800 miles 360 detection and hob

F-35 VS J-20

finally I have been waiting for this video for months

I love how your videos take into consideration the things that can’t be measured with numbers/data

Germany vs Poland and poland is the agressor this time !

so pretty much is a 50/50 situation. Sir, can you make a comparison of F-22 vs Su-37?

@Nine-TailedFox4

7 жыл бұрын

mobiuszero su-37 is a technology demonstrator. There is no comparable air to air fighter to the F-22 in existence. PAK-FA is too new to compare

@user-qn3xu5ee3t

7 жыл бұрын

IAB98Raptor Su-35 can deal with it like it did here with F-35, phps more russian planes should be shot down, but still. Americans say that F-22 RCS is something about 0.0001m2(thank god they don't claim it to be 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000001m2) and that is just not realistic. On the other hand russian sources claim that after analysing it's construction it can be said that raptors RCS equels 0.3-0.4. But of course both sides say what they want ppl to believe

@Nine-TailedFox4

7 жыл бұрын

Георгий Мурзич SU-35 can deal with it but the exchange ratios would be extremely lopsided in the Raptor's favor. Remember that the F-22 was designed purely for air to air and would demolish an F-35 in that role. From manoeuvrability, radar performance, stealth, and kinematic performance, the F-22 dominates. The PK of an AMRAAM fired from a raptor is significantly higher. Other than IRST and instantaneous turn, the SU-35 has no advantages over the raptor. In all honesty, the F-15C would probably whoop an SU-35 pretty hard. APG-63v3, kick-ass kinematic performance, AIM-9X, AIM-120C-7 (future support for AMRAAM-D), JHMCS, and pretty good agility. The F-15C could handle the flanker let alone a raptor....

@090giver090

7 жыл бұрын

>so pretty much is a 50/50 situation. And a clear example why you totally need (at least local) air superiority to gain a major air victory.

@user-qn3xu5ee3t

7 жыл бұрын

IAB98Raptor unlike F-22, Su-35 will soon be able carry long range missiles able to hit targets making maneuvers at 9g, and that means that while F-22 will have to shoot for harassment, Su-35 will be able to launch its missile on a range where F-22 won't be able to effectively evade it. When it comes to other characteristics, your statement about raprors maneuvrability is really questionable because of its 2d thrust vectoring compared to 3D on Su-35. It also has less missiles and shorter range. The only real advantage F-22 can achieve is more time for getting to better position before the fight begins thanks to its good RCS. And even that is questionable, because switching raptors radar on would mean that it wont be able to get to Su-35 undetected

The F-35 block 4 upgrades include expanding internal air to air missile capacity to 6 AIM-120D. Also the F35s don't fly in a conventional close 4 ship formation like that. Their ability to instantaneously share and receive information from anyone on the battlefield allows them to fly dozens of miles away from each other greatly extending the range of their sensors. They can also use missiles from nearby destroyers or cruisers or even other aircraft to down enemy targets, again greatly increasing their missile load.

Under the scenario of F-35 strike mission, wouldn't the air defense system have already been suppressed? L-band radars are pretty big so wouldn't they be a good target for a HARM or JASSM strike?

@theespatier4456

5 жыл бұрын

TehCoz The single radar is an abstraction that exists only to generate radar coverage for ground intercepts.

@lukabogdanovic4658

5 жыл бұрын

lol f35 is ussles against s300

@aidenmcknight2884

4 жыл бұрын

@@lukabogdanovic4658 I can't blame you for thinking this so long ago. You're wrong though

+Binkov T-50 and F-22. Or T-14 vs Leopard 2 revolution. Thanks (or NATO vs Russia)

@alexanderstrauss7949

7 жыл бұрын

At this point there is too little information about the T-50 or the T-14 Armata.. In the first case my bet would still be on the F-22, since I think although being older it should still have a lower radar cross section. than the T-50. (T-50 is probably cheaper though). In the latter example regarding the two tanks I'm not quite sure, cuz the Armata is very new and state-of.the-art. Just wait until the Leo 3 arrives ;)

@alexanderstrauss7949

7 жыл бұрын

There is some truth behind that :D Although there won't be high numbers of T-14 around in the near future... and versus the other Russian tanks Leo 2 is still superior

@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA

7 жыл бұрын

All Tanks can be destroyed by the new anmunition 120 or 125 mm from western and eastern, and of course, for the ATM's who atack from the up, like the spike or javelin.

@ivanmico1

7 жыл бұрын

T90MS is superior against Leopard2. War in Syria proved that. Turkey has lost number of Lepard2 tanks against ISIL forces equiped with US made anti-tank guided missiles, while Syrian army has only lost 1 T90 against the same enemy.

@Hans_Holt

7 жыл бұрын

Ivan Mico I guess you're no tank crewman and has no idea of tank combat. The Turkish Leo2A4 were destroyed by ambushes or because the turkeys lead them horrible on tactical way. A Tank is as good as its crew is. The T90 has some good skills, but also some big disadvantages to its same old counterparts.(f.e. Ergonomics, only 1 thermal sight, less power/mass ratio)

China VS Russia and India VS China next please!

Great vid you should make a video with the f-22 but I don't know what you could put it up against.

@F-22RAPTORr

4 жыл бұрын

PAK FA T-50 SU-57.

awesome videos, thanks man

Nice video Binkov you really deserve more subs

The low observability features favor the Lightning... I am not sure that was as well played as thought, though I agree F-35 needs Sidewinders...

@ozansimitciler5781

3 жыл бұрын

I doubt if r-77s can even lock on to f-35 from frontal aspect at BVR ranges.

another great analysis! thx

Parts 1 and 2 paint an overall picture. Very good, great research and think thru. Conflict 101: Offense takes more energy/ resources than defense.

you're forgetting the real comparison for the su-35 is the f-22

@mkd2839

7 жыл бұрын

No, The F-22 is waaaay too expansive to even be comparable to the Su-35. The comparison for the F-22 is the T-50

@danineira366

7 жыл бұрын

Damminh Khoi you're an idiot they are the same role the f-35 isn't an air superiority fighter cost isn't what makes them comparable

@mkd2839

7 жыл бұрын

Who is the idiot? Su-35 is a multirole, just like F-35. F-22 is an air supeority tactical fighter, the comparable aircraft in the Russian arsenal would be the T-50, or maybe the less advance Su-33

@danineira366

7 жыл бұрын

Damminh Khoi the su-35 is a multi-role air superiority fighter hence it's pretty bad at ground strikes it's a air superiority fighter first, multi role second, it's also never really used as a multi role fighter

@XxSkilersxX

7 жыл бұрын

The Su-33 is a naval fighter, 30 years old. You can compare it with a F18C/D not with a F35. And you dare call people idiots...

Very interesting. I'm curious to see this with the F-22 since it has a more comparable missile load to the Su-35, but older systems than the F-35.

Well Said Sir A balanced argument siting the good bad and ugly of both aircraft in a given senario.

This was a great scenario keep up the good work my dude. You should consider doing an analysis in total air capability of the Russian and American air forces (were they hypothetically equal in number and number).

Please cover the next great showdown of our time: Switzerland vs Austria

@josephahner3031

3 жыл бұрын

My money is on Switzerland

2:35 1700 m/s is not a mach 1,7~ mach 1,7 is about 1700 km/h :) Going 2000 m/s is 7200 km/h, waaaay too fast for a fighter jet. Just an unit mistake :)

Part 2 is the scenario that is most likely to happen, the Flankers would almost always have the advantage of greater numbers. Longer range greater speed and a larger payload, add the ground systems and the advantage will be with the Flankers. I hope this scenario never plays out in the real world.

@ivanlagrossemoule

7 жыл бұрын

"the flankers would almost always have the advantage of greater numbers" There are already 4 times more F-35s than there are Su-35s in existence. The gap will only increase too. It's highly unlikely to happen because there are too many false assumptions in the video. Detection ranges are ridiculously optimistic for the Su-35, and many advantages of the F-35 are just ignored.

Hi Binkov, I'm a huge fan of your videos can you release more, would love to see more videos of country's in the Americas specially those sharing borders.

The F35's can also call missiles from ships and outside bombers, which it would most likely do first to stay stealthy to SU35's. I'd also like to point out that most Sams use x-band to target since that is the only viable targeting option. As for L and S band, this allows the side with low band and mid band to see stealth are there, but they would not be able to target them until x-band or short band was locked on.

@jenell73

7 жыл бұрын

John Davis that sounds like pretty good technology to me

@frostzxs

7 жыл бұрын

Modern sam missiles are having big active radar homing heads (just check size of s-300/400 missiles). You can try to use ground s-band radar to detect and launch missile to region where target is. Missile itself will find and destroy target on close range. Additionally you can use more power and focus to guide it with x-band. Stealth coating can not to absorb all of radiation in this case so range of detection will increase. You can use combination of radars to use triangulation and some other methods of detection with few radars. I think there are many other methods and speliaists know more. Sorry for bad english, i dont know it well.

@johndavis2589

7 жыл бұрын

Understand what you're saying, but the x-band on the missiles is not that good to pick up the stealth plane, so what ends up being fired at the plane are dumb rockets, which can still hit a plane, but are not likely to do so. And, your English is great, friend!

@davidsuzukiispolpot

7 жыл бұрын

But once it is very close, would not such a radar, especially after having been modified for stealth, not be able to pick it up? There is much more power returned at close range ;(square law?) I would assume it is quicker to redesign electronics and replace in hardware than replace fighter jets.

@johndavis2589

7 жыл бұрын

OK, you got me. If it gets within 50 ft of the plane the radar will be able to see the plane. Sir, you are correct.

That assuming that stealth works as advertised. What if Sukhois were able to implement countermeasures which increase their detect ranges? What if they implemented modern data exchange systems? What if they use clever tactics which play to their strengths not the enemy? What if the quality of missiles improves? I think some critics saying that an F-35 is a glorified bomb truck might be right. Then again, they can be totally wrong too... I just don't know.

@thevu8116

7 жыл бұрын

bakters whatever countermeasures sukhoi can use, the f-35 can do too, and due to its much lower RCS, whatever jamming you have will always benefit F-35 more

@izvedimeleoparde8577

7 жыл бұрын

bakters Yes I know. The thing that matters the most is how cards play at the moment of battle. The only thing that I can conclude is that program cost for F-35 was too expensive for no reason tbh. Maybe I am wrong but we will see.

@bakters

7 жыл бұрын

+the vu - I'm not considering jamming here. I've some science background, and from this point of view this whole stealth thing looks like the data analysis problem. All stealthy planes are visible, they are just difficult to *identify*. For example, yes they look like a duck at first glance, but ducks don't fly at transsonic speeds. Ducks don't change their RCS when you scan them with different frequencies. Ducks don't fly high. Ducks don't fire missiles. In essence, if it doesn't look like a duck and it doesn't quack like a duck, it's not a duck. Regarding tactics, all stealthy planes become clearly visible from below. With enough bandwidth you could create a data link between various detection devices and send the resulting coordinates directly to the warhead. At least in theory it seems possible to me... Where "enough bandwidth" and latency is probably below what's required for VOIP phone calls... I just don't know. I simply can't imagine that people paying huge bucks for those planes did not consider all that.

@Historyfan476AD

7 жыл бұрын

The F-35 will only really work for the USA as there the only nation who can afford the sheer numbers you will need.

@thevu8116

7 жыл бұрын

bakters : The whole point of stealth is not just data analysis problem. It has to do with signal-noise ratio. Lower RCS mean lower reflection strength , lower reflection mean the shorter range your radar can detect the signal. All stealth aircraft are visible, but the question is :" at what distance? ", and btw duck do have different RCS at different frequency too. basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress.com/2016/04/12/radar-electronic-countermeasure/ While RCS value of stealth aircraft is much bigger from below, having a web of radar that can be constantly below them is pretty impossible.

Have you thought about taking into account the fact F35 would be directing other planes including F15's being configured with many air to air missiles that would function as a remote weapons platforms for F35's? The entire idea concerning the F35 is that it can use weapons from other planes, boats, and even ground sources as it's own, since the F35 is limited on what it can carry.

the general main ideas were not overly explained but the ideas are not easy to conceptualize but overall the flow and dialogue was understandable to my basic understanding and knowledge of modern jet fighting

Good video. I have a few questions though. In the F35 attacking scenario, how would the SU35s lock and guide their Radar guided missiles? The low wavelength radar on the ground might be able to detect the F35, but I doubt it could guide a missile. And the SU35's radar would have a very hard time detecting F35s as well, so how would it have the accuracy to guide a missile in BVR combat? Am I missing something?

@NBeaver-bx4yl

2 жыл бұрын

no you are not, I think it comes from some little mistakes on his part. Low frequence radars cannot serve as guide for missiles and be accurate at all. Technically the F-35 could get much closer fire their first salvo without the SU being able to fire back, then get into an exchange having downed at least 2 su

Only one huge problem. When the SU-35 is on defence, the S-400 or much better S-500 will do the job just fine.

@jesusf.2600

5 жыл бұрын

Funny. You act as if an F-35A won't be backed by Patriot Pac-3 SAMS. TRY SURVIVING ONE OF THOSE ON AN SU-35 WITH RCS THE SIZE OF A BARN WHEN FULLY LOADED.

@yesverygood7437

4 жыл бұрын

@@anushmikael2540 in that case Nobody cares about S-400s or S-500s

@venezolanoenmilan1522

4 жыл бұрын

Patriot sucks (for real anti air is the weakest US system). But in wondering if we did a good purchase (italy); by buying 90 F35. I think they are good. And the SAMP/T (as anti air support); is second best after the S400/S500 systems

@VisibilityFoggy

4 жыл бұрын

You do realize that the S-500 is an ABM platform, similar to the American THAAD system, and will not target aircraft, right? And S-400 is just a name they threw on to a new S-300 variant, right?

@KaratePath

4 жыл бұрын

@@VisibilityFoggy still S400 is extremely good

I really like your videos... its good work.

F-22 vs Pak-Fa 50? ... Would like to see an unbiased analysis like this one, there are not so many left out there! Awesome video

China vs Russia this is my 5th petition

@kiothr4573

7 жыл бұрын

this isn't seeker daily.

@enigma647

7 жыл бұрын

So you found the reference! Bucket of internets for ya!

@kenwilliams2464

6 жыл бұрын

Russia easily

@jaysonxxx2306

6 жыл бұрын

I waiting this lol

@fatnlazychinc

5 жыл бұрын

This one is done by Binkov already go look for it in his vids. Judging by your name you will not like the result. China is going to shit on Russia

Any chance we'll get some ww3 scenarios or new US civil war scenarios?

@swisstraeng

7 жыл бұрын

well , I was thinking of making a fake war, with no casualities, kinda as a training and competition

@americanmapping9919

7 жыл бұрын

GIVE EVERY SOLDIER AN AIRSOFT GUN AND HAVE THEM FIGHT IT OUT

@andrewnewell8283

7 жыл бұрын

I'm not sure about the assertion that the su35 has a speed advantage- in this game they are coming out to meet the enemy fully loaded with external missiles; whereas the f35 is in clean configuration with weapons internally. The f35 can fly higher for longer because of the reduced cross section and the su35 are having to climb to meet them.

In all honesty unless we all know the top secret aspects of these planes it's impossible to know what would happen. From what Ive read, I think you're underestimating the F-35. But who really knows. Great presentation though. And you got a new sub!

I love your videos and lack of bias. Also could you do a F-22 and F-35 teamup scenario.

Bink! You're the man. Two things that play a role as well you left out are 1. Pilot and ground crew training, and 2. Actual combat hours flown. Both, I think give F35 and its pilot an advantage over SU counterparts. Just a thought. Great video as always.

@banmadabon

4 жыл бұрын

muricans... .

Was flight crew training and annual flight time included in this presentation? Any pilot that gets 500 hours of flight training per year VS a pilot who only gets 150 a year is a issue.

@josuevillasenor7180

6 жыл бұрын

Great work. However, when comparing cost per plane, one must remember that the U.S has a defense but that is more than the next 8 countries. pgpf.org U.S.A. spends about $611B. Russia spends about 69B. America can spend over 8.8 times as much as Russia. That matters.

@generaldoomer2455

6 жыл бұрын

William Pellant that's not the right number lol

finally part 2!!!!!! Looking forvard to warch!

Binkov, could you do a part 3, possibly 4, of this with the F22 and T50 flying escort?

Out of curiosity, do you have military experience with such wargame scenarios? Great video by the way.

@dahfighter9914

7 жыл бұрын

Rafael Lastra com No. the majority of modern Russian equipment doesn't have very much of a combat record. except the Mig 29 in the gulf war (where they failed miserably against us aircraft) if you wish to count that.

@ivanmico1

7 жыл бұрын

to compare Iraqi airforce MIG29 against US airforce against Russin Airforce MIG29 against US airforce is silly. Those MIGs were badly outnumbered, which would not be the case over Russian Federation if US decides to attack

@ivanlagrossemoule

7 жыл бұрын

Dude, Russian aircraft would be outnumbered against the US.

@christopheragent006

7 жыл бұрын

ivanlagrossemoule Dude american aircraft will be detected by Russia's s300 and s400 and shot down.

@ls200076

7 жыл бұрын

christopheragent006 ooooooooh

Russia vs China or RUssia vs NATO or japan vs china or uk vs france or france vs germany.....Please do one of them

@andrewforman6324

7 жыл бұрын

AKP Star Russia vs NATO would be a beatdown

@darksea3154

7 жыл бұрын

US vs world would be cool too

@frostzxs

7 жыл бұрын

nukes and death

I just subscribe to your channel. keep up the awesome!

Good unbiased analysis!

This video, just like part 1, is fundamentally flawed in it's logic. First, it completely ignores the electronic warfare capabilities of the F-35. He mentions that the SU-35's will use jamming but forgets that the F-35's will also. Also, at 4:00 he claims the flankers can shoot first simply because they have more missiles and faster launch speed. Did he forget they are trying to shoot stealth fighters? They would need to get much closer just to detect the F-35's let alone start shooting, all the while being well within the F-35's detection and weapons envelope. The ground control cannot provide specific targeting or even exact position data and would likely be jammed by the F-35's. So the F-35's would most definitely shoot first and significantly degrade the defending force. Also, even in a visual fight the F-35's would have huge advantages due to the user-friendliness and ergonomics of their cockpit systems, and the superiority of their sensor technologies allowing them to lock and shoot faster and easier then the flankers.

@justinreynolds1392

3 жыл бұрын

Also, would the f-35 be alone? An F15EX carries a lot a ammo that can be fired by the F35. Don’t forget we have F22’s that might be flying with the too. This assumes they F35 can be targeted

@whatdoyoumean9084

3 жыл бұрын

@@justinreynolds1392 It clearly shows that you didn't watch the video properly from the start to end, Binkov already explained that only the F-35 and SU-35 will fight nothing more, so that means this is just a hypothetical analysis if these two fighter jets met in the sky with only them fighting each other.

@whatdoyoumean9084

3 жыл бұрын

Just like what Binkov said, once the F-35's radar is turned on, it will be detected by the Early warning radar, the F-35 will have much longer time to jam and see the EWR because of it's more powerful processing power than the F-35 because Russian EWRs uses L-band, thus reacting more quickly and can detect quickly. There are also many US pilots and analyzers that knows and agrees that F-35 will lose in Short range air-to-air combat because of the fact that this aircraft is specifically made for stealth and aims to avoid being seen and avoid engaging in dogfights. Lastly, this analysis video is just a hypothetical one and this fight would likely never happen due to many aspects in air combat.

@justinreynolds1392

3 жыл бұрын

The F35 radar changes frequently 1000 times per second. It’s not going to give it’s position away. If that’s the case I want my 1 trillion dollar investment back

@justinreynolds1392

3 жыл бұрын

The ENTIRE purpose of the F35 is to NEVER be in a short range fight

latest kill ratio of f35 vs 4th gen is 15:1 redflag stats

@mattmatt516

7 жыл бұрын

brock marks Nice! Do you have a source so I can share that? haha

@brockmarks3984

7 жыл бұрын

sure... www.defensenews.com/articles/red-flag-gives-f-35a-its-toughest-test-yet

@bluemeriadoc

7 жыл бұрын

twitter.com/ValerieInsinna/status/832254757045694464

@nepalihercules

7 жыл бұрын

no real missile

@briandeaton5048

5 жыл бұрын

2018 its 21:1

im a huge fan of these dude theyre so awesome i just need to see them instantly when i get a notification xD! im hoping that u can do finland vs russia someday? thanks :)

Now we need a close dogfight episode and we need to see some close manuevers and tactics as if they were reduced to close range missles or gun fight

This scenario lacks a key component. AWACS support.

@therealmp40

5 жыл бұрын

It would be risky for the F-35s because there's the posibility of radar picking up on AWACS and thus losing the effect of surprise

@danchoen3847

5 жыл бұрын

There are only 30 AEW airplanes in service you would just use then for a small attack you would conserve them

@justinreynolds1392

3 жыл бұрын

The F35 doesn’t need AWACS. It’s capabilities are astonishing.

@josephahner3031

3 жыл бұрын

@@justinreynolds1392 awacs provides critical early warning and vectors flights of combat aircraft onto incoming enemies. F-35 may have an excellent radar but it still doesn't have as long of a detection range as an E-3 Sentry.

new scenario: 2 F35 + 2 F22 Raptor vs 4 Suhoi 35

@Simbirsk2130

5 жыл бұрын

how about 2 F-35 + 2 F-22 vs 2 MiG-31 and 2 Su-35

@anitchoudhary527

5 жыл бұрын

@@Simbirsk2130 1 su-35 vs 5 f-22 in dogfight

@aidenmcknight2884

4 жыл бұрын

@@anitchoudhary527 not even a fight there

@hornet8364

4 жыл бұрын

@@anitchoudhary527 its suposed to be a fight, not an overkill

Don't know where you took that figure of 106 kN for the F35 engines? This are the unclassified figures for the Pratt & Whitney F135 engine: Dry thrust: 28,000 lbf (125 kN) Thrust with afterburner: 43,000 lbf (191 kN)

These are great and not biased at all! I like that you are very thorough :) How about Canada vrs anyone? I'm due for a laugh!

why not make a comparison with the f22

@tonygreene81able

5 жыл бұрын

Because that would be “easy work" for F22. Raptor would easily battle 1/2 dozen Flanker. FACTS

I still don't like how slow it is for the price tag. I feel in any contested airspace its complicated set of specific advantages are going to get good pilots killed, just like the F4 phantom

It would be interesting if we did England vs Scotland and Ireland, or some variation of that.

Good videos Part 1 and 2

2:35 Last time I checked, the Su-35 wasn't going at mach 5.8, and the F-35 at 4.9

@thaimobile2405

6 жыл бұрын

1234

@levvy3006

6 жыл бұрын

You have low IQ

Make Romania vs Hungary please

@sakatagintoki3803

7 жыл бұрын

From seeker daily to Binkov's Battlegrounds fluffy unicorn is every where.

@florin.simonescu

7 жыл бұрын

sakata gintoki be with me forever

@jdenispro3086

7 жыл бұрын

daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

@dillydilly3680

6 жыл бұрын

Romania would win.

There was one issue I didn't see mentioned- the speed of the plane depends on the amount of weapons carried, not just the altitude. The F-35 max speed is low, but it can carry a full load at a higher speed than a fully loaded Gen 4 plane. So a recalculation of the effect of speed would be useful.

@petetoma

6 жыл бұрын

I would also doubt the amount of missile hits allowed on F-35s. Even in WVR the heat seekers aren't as effective against F-35 b/c of reduced heat signature from its F-135 engine and unless guns are used, the missiles are in general much harder to target on F-35 again b/c of its all aspect stealth. Also i read on some forums that L-band radar may still not be long enough wave length to detect VLO plane from a sufficiently long distance. F-35 may choose to jam the ground based radar to prevent being detected so early warning may or may not happen. Anyways my point is that even though the vid is cool it's based on very shaky factual grounds and lots of baseless assumptions.

Can u do a updated f-35 vs Su-35 video? And also the f-35s planed top speed is Mach 1.6 but it's top is classified and it can go faster then 1.6 but anyways great video!

Usa defence vs russian attack... PLEASE! Or Norway vs sweden

@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA

7 жыл бұрын

No way Russia has a defensive army, they havent expeditionary capacity lo launch a war far away,

@mrjpb23

7 жыл бұрын

Lol, what? Russia has near-zero expeditionary combat capability. They can barely fight outside their borders let alone their continent.

@redheadrusskie

7 жыл бұрын

+Boxy Brown They focus their military expendature far more on defensive measures, hence why only one operational aircraft carrier is operation in the Russian fleet but a myriad of impressive air defense systems such as the S-400/500. I have no idea from where you pulled the nonsense of Russia's militaristic capabilities, but the victor never underestimated their opponent. But your kind can be of use, considering Napoleon once said to "Never interrupt your enemy while they're making a mistake".

@Anderson_Hwang

7 жыл бұрын

the S-500 is not even operational yet, and btw the AEGIS on US warships are far more advanced than their Russian counterparts

@redheadrusskie

7 жыл бұрын

Hwang Anderson The S-500 is operational, a deployment of them took place on Russia's southern border following the Turks downing a Russian jet in 2015. Given that you did not know this, I will take your claim with regards to AEGIS' supposed superiority with a pinch of salt.

Where are Russian SAMs in this scenario?

@petrsukenik9266

3 жыл бұрын

Same as american ones Not in the video

I would really i like to see some involvement of AWACs in these comparison, it really makes a world of difference for the attackers

Very nice analysis

F-22 vs Su-35

Каких, каких пеньков комиссар?

Anyone know what kind of program he uses to make there videos?

will you do a t50 vs f35 when more info comes out about the plane?

Please man!! Brazil vs Argentina..

@ginoramirez6222

7 жыл бұрын

sape !!

@VRichardsn

7 жыл бұрын

This should be interesting! It is kind of like the Germany vs USSR of South America, given country size and population.

@shonix123

6 жыл бұрын

in soccer

PAK FA vs f35

I really like your videos, but i have to say though, have you seen the combat (A to A)statistics between 5 gen fighter jets and 4 gen fighter jets???

great work

Nice! I really think that the Su-35 Flanker won't really do well while fighting the F-35

@hihi-fi8by

7 жыл бұрын

Admiral Salen Kotch why

@Duke_of_Lorraine

7 жыл бұрын

If it's 1 vs 1 yes, however when you consider the cost... though the US can put much more $ on the table than Russia can on the other hand

@danineira366

7 жыл бұрын

Blastoplastify lol considering that the f-35 shows up the size of a bee on x band radar and a bird on l band radar I think the su-35 would struggle mire than the f-35

@user-qn3xu5ee3t

7 жыл бұрын

Dani Neira a bee? Why not a gnat or, dunno, a microbe, For example?

@danineira366

7 жыл бұрын

Георгий Мурзич how is a microbe the size of a bee?

Honestly the F-35 in this performs very well in air to air for an aircraft is meant for air to ground and have F-22 escorts

@iowabb-616

7 жыл бұрын

F-22 Raptors are way better than the F-35 because: Agility , Weapons , Radar , Speed.. By the way F-22 Raptors can go at speeds at 2.2 mach but the F-35 can go at max speed of 1.6 mach . The F-22 have 8 missiles but the F-35 have only 4 missiles . F-22 Raptor is better than any aircraft in the world because when they maked an improvised "Dogfight" the F-22's We're just flyin' around and slowly improvised disaster of the sky and also there was only 1 F-22 vs 5 F-15! The Raptors are slightly faster than the Su-47.. there is a "Dogfight" scenario published on "KZread" . The radar is the most sophisticated aircraft radar in the world!! That's why the F-22 Raptor is the best in the world!

@simpicitur1721

7 жыл бұрын

Xzcl Gaming Acutally, the F22 is just now implementing AIM-9X and the AIM-120D and has yet to gain IRST and HMCS. As it stands right now, the F35 had a better weapons and electronics suite being a newer plane and the F22 has been scuttled since 2011.

@iowabb-616

7 жыл бұрын

Please tell me is the F-35 is better than F-22 .. that was only one reason...

Amazing analysis

GREECE VS EGYPT! Great Video!

F-35

Again with the "dodging massive salvos"

Very interesting and realistic scenarios.

Well made video Comissar like always. Can you make a video about fight betwen polish or slovakian Mig 29 (Izidaje 9.12) against russian Mig - 29 SMT as Su 24 escorts with use of radar sites on both sides ?

Mexico vs the Usa! ...lol

@Binkov

7 жыл бұрын

With or without wall? With or without sneak attack from those overfriendly Canadians? (Remember, keep your friends close and your enemies closer.)

@simpicitur1721

7 жыл бұрын

Binkov's Battlegrounds Before and after the wall is built, 2 part episode to raise money for the wall!

@FCR120

7 жыл бұрын

chile vs balivia and peru second pacific war?

@aaron5893

7 жыл бұрын

seriously?

@gta4haterhq

7 жыл бұрын

Sean Harris leel

j20 vs f35

@fabio6170

7 жыл бұрын

Shami the Misunderstood pussy cat still a prototipe

@mattmatt516

7 жыл бұрын

Shami the Misunderstood pussy cat There's no way to compare them since there's no real info on the J20 to compare

you should have a link to part 1

like all of your video and analysis