As my Uncle used to say; "It's the unknown factor" that we need to examine closely and take into account! I'm a firm believer that it was/is utterly impossible for "Life" to have just created itself out of non living matter. Thus I do believe that something incomprehensible was responsible. Most of us were taught to call this something "God"! But for at least 40 years, in our own public schools, the kids are taught just the opposite. The believe that a "Creator" was not necessary has so filled our culture, that most will not even sit still to listen to any other ideas or arguments to the contrary. Thus: Satan has done his work well. Yes, I also believe in the "unseen realm" that exist all around us. I'm old, poor and very sick. I don't expect to live much longer. But I also know there is and will be a FINAL JUDGMENT. I only hope that I, some how, "make the cut".

@Legend-mg2ry

8 ай бұрын

Sorry you believe in fairy tales that a god create everything out of nothing.

@statutesofthelord

8 ай бұрын

robin, just throw your helpless soul on Jesus Christ, repent, allow him to wash away your sins, and then do as he says to do in the Holy Bible. Jesus is looking for every possible way to save all of us humans, but only those who truly want his salvation will be saved. May you be encouraged and strengthened in your sickness.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

You seem unaware that many "christians" support the theory of evolution. Many "christians" also say 'god created evolution', a nefarious workaround. I would say that belief is immaterial. You have used the word 'believe' three times, but your claim that you "KNOW" of a final judgement sounds like typical frantic "christian" dogma.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

@@statutesofthelord Tell us how a stillborn infant can be saved by your sinister sky frightener.

@statutesofthelord

8 ай бұрын

@@rf7477rf, It is not possible, by definition, for anyone to truly be an Atheist. No true Christian supports Evolution, because belief in Evolution requires belief in the god of aeons of time.

Excellent points! Thanks for this helpful video!

Clearly you're doing a great job Calvin when you receive the vitriol of hate that appears in your comments (while those trolls and/or bots have nothing of value to offer when it comes to using the mind effectively). If only they could see objectively the world around them.

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

That’s the gauge? Be so impressively wrong, a massive liar and vilify atheists that when they come to tell him he’s wrong and terrible, that he’s somehow more convincing? Makes perfect sense … it’s not that he’s wrong, and a divisive liar - no - he’s onto something. Jesus hired male prostitutes. Does that bother you? Well, I must be right.

@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844

8 ай бұрын

Yes, there are people who comment with vitriol, but don't judge us all by those. There are also comments with valid criticism of Calvin's points. Maybe you missed those because you're focussed on the vitriol, but that doesn't mean they're not there. In this segment, fx, Calvin says that information has only ever been observed as derived from an intelligent source. I take this to mean he thinks information must come from an intelligent source, which is false. Consider this simple invented scenario: A pilot crashes his plane on a desserted island. During the night there's a storm and some branches break off a tree and land in an H shape on the beach on the island. In the morning a rescue plane flies over the island and the pilot of the rescue plane sees the H shape and recognises it as the international sign for Help and rescues the pilot who crashed. The branches of the tree in an H shape is information and communicate the same message as if the crashed pilot had made the H shape himself, but this information is not derived from an intelligent mind. No vitriol in this comment, just an objective observation about Calvin's claim. If you see my point, please consider that there are valid objections to Calvin's claims and we're not all trolls. Have a nice day

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

​​​​​​​​​​​​​@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844Well soon a storm will come and write the entire Bible on the beach with twigs and pebbles....😂😮 The odds of getting ONE understandable letter correct is 1:1. The odds of getting the first 17 letters to make an intelligible word or sentence is 20,922,789,888,000 to 1. (Actually, odds are much greater because this represents only the possible number of arrangements of 17 letters, that doesn't mean any intelligible sentence or word would be produced. Considering there are 26 letters in say, the Alphabet, this number increases even more dramatically, and even moreso if you repeat a letter.) Now, what would be the odds of getting an entire book to make sense? Your theory only works with one or two letters. The odds of another branch falling to spell HI is high, but getting them to fall to spell "HELP ME I'M STRANDED" is literally astronomical. Thanks for making this cringeworthy criticism so easy to debunk. I'm sure you know this already and you're catering to idiots, because no rational person could ever take you seriously. In college I was told that if you put 100 monkeys at typewriters that one day one of them would write War and Peace. I'm still waiting for the first few words.....😂 plus it's getting pricey feeding all these monkeys. 🐒 🐒 🐒 🐒 🐒 🐵 To further illustrate, change one letter in a computer program and it glitches, change one letter in your email and messages never arrive. Disingenuous, to say the least. Also, you really didn't answer where the rescue plane came from, I suppose it fell from a tree as well. 🚁 ✈️

@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844

8 ай бұрын

​@@notsure1582 There's a certain irony in my responding respectfully to a comment complaining about disrespectful comments, only to receive a disrespectful comment in reply. Anyway, what have you debunked? If you agree with me that the H could be formed by falling branches, and H is a recognised sign for HELP, then the H is information and thus information can come from a non-intelligent source, which was my point, and then Calvin is wrong. It doesn't need to be complex information to be information. I agree that it's very unlikely that branches would fall into place to form a whole sentence, but that's irrelevant. As far as I can see, you've accepted my point and not debunked anything.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Of course it might appear to come from an intelligent source, but is it not just Paradolia, whereby your mind has been tricked into thinking it is an H, when really, had there been no one stranded on the island, it would have been meaningless, and thus, false information conveyed? But had the man been stranded without hope, wouldn't he have been tempted to believe some higher power had saved him? The pilot might have dismissed it as meaningless, seeing only branches. Information is complex by definition, so non complex information is just Paradolia. But to "receive" such symbolism and understand it is the intelligence in operation, not just the creation of it. If matter is a non intelligent evolutionary process, then the obvious conclusion is that creatures made up of the stuff are not intelligent either. If truth is disrespectful to you, then you will always live in darkness.

Good video! Thx 😊

Very good!!!

During an interview, when asked if the genetic code is really a code, Dr. Richard Dawkins answered, *_“It [the genetic code] IS a code. It's definitely a code.”_* (Source: Jon Perry - Genetics & Evolution Stated Casually KZread Channel Interview with Dr. Richard Dawkins on 4-2-2022. Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world’s foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution)

Thank you ! I love your work.......blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia .

Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created. Revelation 4:11 KJV

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

Um, what? revelation also says heaven is a 1500 mile cube with giant locusts, an angel army of 200 million and jesus with bronze feet on a white horse. If god created small pox and bubonic plague for pleasure then you can't really expect me to worship him. Actually, where is god gonna receive power from?

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

​@@rf7477The Bible explained thousands of years ago that people should wash their hands for cleanliness, yet, since they didn't read the Bible, Doctors in the 1800's weren't washing their hands when delivering babies after performing autopsies on dead bodies. Then someone figured it out, hey, wash your hands. Reading the Bible could have prevented many diseases, and pagan rituals like human sacrifice led to disease and mass extermination of pagan people's. They wiped themselves out.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 The 613 laws of Judaism have absolutely nothing to do "christianity". The bible didn't even know of the female human egg. The bible also recommends stoning rebellious children to death. The OT has a vast number of atrocities and several accounts of ethnic cleansing. The Romans bathed regularly and also spread several nasty bacteria that way. "christianity" is pagan. Christmas, 40 day spiritual intercession, virgin birth, resurrection, ascension, prayer, offerings, sacrifice, hell and heaven and all gods are pagan. The longest surviving cultures on Earth have never used the bible. Reading the bible to 'prove' something is fallacious and dangerous.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

If Jesus is a pagan god, and Christians are pagan, then why wouldn't a pagan like yourself accept him? Sounds like all the things you believe in. Why did Christianity put an end to pagan human sacrifice and most all pagan rituals? Sounds like you're missing some crucial facts.😂 I will prove Everything with the Bible while you fumble with your lies and ancient mythology. As for what substances were floating around in Roman bath water, I will leave that to your imagination. So, for thousands of years people ate hen eggs and never saw a chick come from an egg? wTF are you talking about? As a Christian I never ignored laws related to hygiene, so is that your argument that Christians shouldn't or don't take a bath? This is an asinine thread and I'm moving on to greater things.

@m0x910

8 ай бұрын

@@rf7477You may need to re-read Revelation a few more times, you have missed the misunderstood things on so many levels I don’t know where to begin correcting you. In fact read the whole Bible from the beginning before you race to Revelation. The word for power here can also be translated to authority, it’s not power as in energy.

*_"After Watson and Crick, we know that genes themselves, within their minute internal structure, are long strings of pure digital information. What is more, they are truly digital..."_* (Richard Dawkins, River out of Eden, 16. Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world’s foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution)

Very good point. If DNA is very complex and digital to the core. It's still necessary for life to develop. However that's the evolutionist's biogensis: that information created itself. If information can create itself, it does not need certain conditions to create itself. As it would've formed anyway.

@pyre8478

8 ай бұрын

I would add here that if information could create itself, why don't we see it *continuously* create itself? We would be finding new rules of nature manifest, contrary to what we see, all the time if it could. So, why don't we see new codes? Perhaps something made of different amino acids, or something else entirely? Why aren't completely different modes of life popping into existence besides what we see in the organic world? Why then are the rules maintained in a functional capacity at all, if there is no intention to function to begin with?

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@pyre8478 _I would add here that if information could create itself, why don't we see it continuously create itself?_ We do see nature continually creating new patterns of matter and energy. Humans *define* those patterns as information. That's how.

@haggismcbaggis9485

8 ай бұрын

@@pyre8478 Carbon based life seems to be the default mode for life because of its chemical properties. Researchers have developed other synthetic nucleotide base pairs, so that is a possibility. However, organisms would have to start from scratch and overcome 4 billion years of history.

@Legend-mg2ry

8 ай бұрын

@@pyre8478because life existing now would eat it up.

@jockyoung4491

8 ай бұрын

@@pyre8478 We do see knew DNA code all the time. Information is constantly created in every generation of every cell. And then that information is subjected to the filter of natural selection, and the best coding is retained.

God bless you 🙏🏿

thank you for sharing the good "information" 😁😁

_"we cannot derive life from known physics"_ Kim, Walker and Davies _Informational architecture of the cell_ Royal society publishing, 2016

@lizd2943

7 ай бұрын

Not knowing how life arose has nothing to do with the fact of evolution.

@chrismessier7094

7 ай бұрын

@@lizd2943 it's feeling a little dodgy in here XD

Nice

Yesterday there was a 60+ comment thread started by Fredthe47th where Fred drastically misrepresented Claude Shannon's views on Information Theory. Fred was called on his misrepresentations and as a reply seems to have deleted his whole thread. Heh. 😏

@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844

8 ай бұрын

Ha 😄 I didn't notice that, but you're right. That's like knocking down the chess pieces when you're about to lose. The weirdest thing is that he provided the ammunition himself, in the form of a source (the Bates' article) that disputes what he said. So much for debating the topic 😂

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 Like most creationists his scientific knowledge begins and ends with C and P. 🙂

Modern Quantum Physics has shown that reality is based on probability: ​ A statistical impossibility is defined as “a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument." The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of just one (1) functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the cell was not formed by un-directed random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that un-directed random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.) Of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer. On the other hand, it has been scientifically proven numerous times that Consciousness does indeed collapse the wave function to cause information waves of probability/potentiality to become particle/matter with 1/1 probability. A rational and reasonable person could therefore conclude that the answer is consciousness. A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what some of the world’s top scientists ‘must’ believe in because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, biased, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic, subjective, biased, incomplete ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millennia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by observation of the universe and discoveries in Quantum Physics.)

@scottmclennan1165

8 ай бұрын

Once again, the educated elites know so much about so many things that just aren't true.. lots of hundred dollar words that still = bullshit😂

@lizd2943

7 ай бұрын

No one thinks it all formed by chance, so your odds claims are meaningless.

Information is abstract and applies to our understanding of things. Nothing is information unless we perceive it as so. A chunk of iron may not seem like information alone, but if we were to analyze it’s atomic structure then we can gain information about what it’s composed of. Just like your message written chalk is not information to someone who doesn’t read English.

@settledown444

7 ай бұрын

Correct! Science has been pointing out for two decades that *information is a human construct.* It's simply the name we give to observed patterns of matter and energy. It was the creationists at the Discovery Institute who started the misinformation campaign information was some sort of "magic pixie dust" that God sprinkled around to make life happen. They tried to convince uneducated layman that nothing in abiogenesis or evolution can happen unless their supernatural entity came by and deliberately gave it a squirt of external "information". Sadly lots of non-scientific people fell for the ruse.

Excellent video and points! God is real indeed! Nothing can or will exist without Him!

Water molecules could be a code that goes HOH HOH HOH HOH HOH. Yet, I would not argue that Santa Claus created water.

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

But it snows during Christmas, and frosty is made of snow… oh my god he is real

Epic

An atheist once said that given billions of years of time DNA could create itself through trial an error, obviously through mutations. But even if mutations were not 99,99999% harmful as they are, trial and error would still not work. Accumulating mutations quickly degrade the structural and thermodynamic stability and function of protein folds. Stable Tertiary Structure is lost long before the mutations in question could generate a novel protein fold. 3-15 mutational trials and errors are enough to destroy a DNA section while different possibilities for error are counted in millions. This means that each time after an error, the trial and error -process must start again from zero. Again and again and again ... A successful evolutionary process becomes theoretically and practically impossible. But if we want to give the final blow to the "Almighty Happenstance", we can remind that "trial and error" needs also the goal when it'll be 100% ready and functional. Somebody has to know that goal, so that the "trial and error" -process knows when to stop. Who would be that somebody? In addition, that "somebody" must be able to conduct simultaneously everything else in the cell, to play the same tune at the same time.

Great vid! God remains a logical necessity. Darwinism remains a logical fallacy.

@jockyoung4491

8 ай бұрын

There is no such thing as "Darwinism"

@refuse2bdcvd324

8 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 type "define darwinism" in the search engine and educate yourself.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Darwinism is basically natural selection, which is an observed process. We've learned a lot more since Darwin's day that continues to confirm and expand the theory. Darwin didn't even know about DNA.@@refuse2bdcvd324

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

@@refuse2bdcvd324I like how you keep telling us your god is a logical necessity, but never actually tell us why.

@CaptainFantastic222

8 ай бұрын

Not quite but go on living your life in ignorance

You are perfectly right. And it's very funny how natural scientists think they can find what they don't know in anything? Unless it is revealed to you. God has revealed Himself to man in both nature and design. If you don't see God in these then it isn't that God isn't there, rather you are blind.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

If you do see a god or any supernatural entity then you are hallucinating.

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

It’s funny how dim witted creationists think they are smart, but then write a stupid opening line about “natural scientists” and … really I don’t know what you’re talking about because that wasn’t even a sentence. But you’re trying to pontificate and I applaud your effort. Not that creationists put any effort into anything anyways.

@tonyabrakwah8105

8 ай бұрын

I don't waste my breath on narrow minded people like you. Narrow minded because you don't explore other areas of study than your one sided deceptive theories that keeps changing every now and then.

@taylorthetunafish5737

8 ай бұрын

@@tonyabrakwah8105 "Narrow minded because you don't explore other areas of study....." That's quite ironic given that you haven't bothered with the science.

Love the example of writing a statement on the board. The marker did not create the statement. The molecular statements of our genome were not created by the DNA. God is the creator.

@nothing-om6fn

7 ай бұрын

​@@mountkeen8701asking a creationist for evidence of god? You madlad

@lizd2943

7 ай бұрын

DNA is not a statement. It's chemistry.

God is a frequency ..hints why when we quiet our mind we experience bliss and stages of Gods love . Start following your breath…give your mind a point to come back to when it wanders.

@chrismessier7094

7 ай бұрын

don't love death. God loves life

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

@@chrismessier7094”Anyone who loves their life will lose it, while anyone who hates their life in this world will keep it for eternal life.” John 12:25 Says to hate life so idk about that one buddy

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

The blissful stages of Christianity are caused by subliminal messages/ques in their song structure, the sense of community, and the feeling of always being loved. Each of these things is explained well using psychology and sociology. That’s why cults use them all the time

@chrismessier7094

7 ай бұрын

@@leroyjenkins3744 hate the sinful life, which because we rather love it, God must curse us with death. Otherwise, He would be complicit with evil

@chrismessier7094

7 ай бұрын

@@leroyjenkins3744for me the bliss is from seeing the astronomical design and beauty in life, coupled with that in the Bible we see God loves life, love and beauty; death, suffering and evil are our fault. And yet God conquers death, offering forgiveness to whosoever

To consider the possible scientific messaging of the Bible is to completely miss the Bible's theological messaging.

@taylorthetunafish5737

8 ай бұрын

There's no science in the bible. Zero. Zilch. None.

@kevinhutchins4222

8 ай бұрын

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Fair enough. It's not about cosmology or science. It's about what God needs you to know.

@taylorthetunafish5737

7 ай бұрын

@@kevinhutchins4222 Does god need you to know that's it's okay to beat your slaves to near death? Exodus 21:20-21 says it's okay to do so.

@kevinhutchins4222

7 ай бұрын

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Umm. I don't know what Bible you're reading, but that passage talks about the punishment that should be given to the slave owner for abusing the slave. But keep trying. You could use the practice.

@taylorthetunafish5737

7 ай бұрын

@@kevinhutchins4222 Exodus 21:20-21 When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. Maybe you need to re-read this verse. It states that it is okay for you to beat your slaves as long as they don't die within 3 days. The only punishment for the slave owner is they'll be punished if the human they own as property dies within 3 days. It doesn't state what the punishment is, either. Regardless, the verse still states it's okay to beat your slaves. Are you stating that slavery is okay? And that it's okay to beat your slaves as long as they don't die from it in a few days? Is that what you're stating?

Alright, never thought I'd have to explain analogies but here we go. When we say DNA is information, we're comparing it to languages so people can better understand what we're talking about because it essentially tells the body what to do. Of course there's no actual "information" as that's not a real thing, but it works the same way we would communicate information so we use it as a term so people can understand it better.

@NoN0-eb8lj

7 ай бұрын

You are a liar. You don't what "information" means

@NoN0-eb8lj

7 ай бұрын

False equivalence fallacy.

@nothing-om6fn

7 ай бұрын

@@NoN0-eb8lj ?

@NoN0-eb8lj

7 ай бұрын

@@nothing-om6fn you clearly don't know what "information" means.

@nothing-om6fn

7 ай бұрын

@@NoN0-eb8lj "what is conveyed or represented by a particular arrangement or sequence of things." What's your definition?

Didn't really make the point. I would consider the complexity of the code and calculate how much randomness would be required to spontaneously create such complexity. IE:. Not enough time in creation to accomplish this. Obviously a design from great intelligence.

@lizd2943

7 ай бұрын

Who said it was randomness? Evolution is not random. Neither is chemistry.

@calvinsmith7575

6 ай бұрын

Codes have always been shown to come from an intelligent mind (the point).

@lizd2943

6 ай бұрын

Calling DNA code is a metaphor. It's chemistry. @@calvinsmith7575

Excellent

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

Rubbish.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

​@@rf7477Rubbish is spelled with only one "b". Correction: Rubish.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 and the letter J was not invented until the 16th century so there is no such person as jesus.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Who invented the letter J, or was that just some random non intelligent evolutionary process as well? Wouldn't it have taken 3 billion years to evolve into the letter J?😂 When you meet Jesus you can tell him yourself that he doesn't exist, that should be interesting...He can defend himself, and doesn't need my help.

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@rf7477dude look I’m on your side, but that’s a dumb argument. Jesus is the Greek version of the name yeshua (written ישוע in Hebrew). Now whether he existed or not is up for debate since no eyewitness recorded anything, but he could have existed but was just a failed apocalyptic preacher. Either way he wasn’t a god

I love your videos but I disagree a little bit, I think there is information in every piece of matter and particle in the universe, if there wasn't they couldn't exist, there would be no consistency

@statutesofthelord

8 ай бұрын

Agreed! There is information inherent in everything, just by the mere fact that it exists.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

​​@@statutesofthelordYou just strengthened the point of this video for me. The whole universe is intelligently designed to the last detail, jot and tittle. Thank You.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 Information =/= conscious design. Your ignorance is showing again.

@statutesofthelord

8 ай бұрын

@@settledown444settle, you do understand that information comes from an informer, don't you?

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

@@settledown444 So, why are scientists looking for a "message" from outer space to prove that alien life exists, and that there is intelligent life in the universe besides ourselves? Wouldn't that message have to be sent by an intelligent life form? Aliens would have to exist first in order to consciously design a message containing information. If scientists thought information was everywhere, then why search for a message? When your hard drive can write its own Code let me know because that would make you the most famous magician in the universe. Jesus spoke the universe into existence and you're still struggling with viruses on your computer, He's light years ahead of you, son. Do you honestly believe that mankind on this earth has the latest technology? You say Alexa, turn on the light. And God said, let there be light. Big difference. You have an earth centered ego, but God has more "technology" and "information" than you can even dream of, and has been around a lot longer. He's the smart kid in class, you're just the bully trying to cheat and copy his answers. It cracks me up that you think you're smarter than God. 😂 But you, thinking yourself wise, still struggling with a simple concept like information.

Following the big bang theory, the universe had a beginning, if it had a beginning it was created, if it was created it has a creator. Its creator must be, Following logic: non espacial or non dependant upon space as we know it, ie: omnipresent or existing beyond spacial restrictions since its beyond space. The creator must be beyond mass or imaterial. Since it operates outside space it cannot have mass And the creator must be beyond time or its restrictions because it acted outside times frame itself before the existance of time itself. therefore God is simultaneously infinite and timeless in the true literal sense since he is beyond time itself. Since the laws of physics exist dependant on time and space, and the creator of the universe is already proposed to be beyond space, matter and time itself, on which the Laws of physics operate on top of, henceforth the creator is proven to be beyond the natural laws themselfs. Or himself to be the Law giver since he created the very fundation for the laws to work upon. And to give laws one must be rational, intelectual and to be a creator one must have a purpose. This is the God in the scriptures.

@logicalatheist1065

7 ай бұрын

Not a lot of logic went into your comment

I get that it seems unlikely that (finite and imperfect) life could exist undesigned. But however unlikely it is, it seems even more unlikely to me that infinite and perfect life could exist undesigned. That makes even less sense.

@dimitrisleo

8 ай бұрын

What would make the most sense is if nothing ever existed. But something does exist, so we can conclude that someone created everything. I agree that a being like God is incomprehensible and weird, but we can see His footprints all over the universe. We didn't invent God, we just witness His creation and know that He must be there because the universe needs a creator. If we weren't alive and nothing existed, we wouldn't be here to make these arguments. But here we are, so now we need a creator in our logical thinking.

@MastaE2288

8 ай бұрын

Negative. If you think that the creator follows the rules of the creation, then you would deny every single creator/creation relationship to ever exist. For example, a programmer can create a program to follow the rules they set forth. The programmer is not subject to any of those rules. This holds true for every creator/creation relationship. Since matter does not make itself, and we know that space, time, and matter are all dependent on each other, then the creator of space, time, and matter is not bound by the rules of space, time, and matter. With the understanding of this sound logic...a spaceless, timeless, and immaterial creator is perfectly in line with everything we know to be true.

@jockyoung4491

8 ай бұрын

Life is neither infinite nor perfect, so that part seems irrelevant.

@MastaE2288

8 ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 Whether or not life on earth is finite or imperfect doesn't matter in any of the context of my previous comment.

@jamesc3505

8 ай бұрын

@@dimitrisleo: "What would make the most sense is if nothing ever existed. But something does exist, so we can conclude that someone created everything." I'd guess you're not actually arguing that someone must have created /everything/, though, but that someone must have created everything /except themselves/? i.e. You accept that something (or someone) must be uncreated? But, if so, why do you apply the exception where you do? i.e. Why do you think the exception doesn't apply to the universe, but does apply to a god that you think created the universe?

“Atheist Creed”??? 😂😅😂 Not all atheists are humanists…

If there is a creator DNA proves that creator is either lazy, incompetent or purposefully deceitful in the creation of humans

@theHentySkeptic

8 ай бұрын

Here is a little science experiment for you. Take a xopy of page 1 of Genesis. Take the copy, and copy that again do this 15 more times. Let me know what you find... error correcting copying machines probably don't make themselves.

@CaptainFantastic222

8 ай бұрын

@@theHentySkeptic Why would that be classified as a science experiment? Science is a method of investigation of the natural world. You might have to elaborate on your example because it doesn’t make any sense.

@theHentySkeptic

8 ай бұрын

The experiment is simple. You can observe the degradation of copy quality over generations. I use a bible page to make it more interesting. Copy Genesis page one. Take the copy and copy that - this is generation 1. Take the generation 1 copy and make a copy of that. You will quickly observe that the copies get worse with each generation. This is uncorrected copying. After about 15 generations, the page is unreadable. This is science of the grade 6 kind. This should help you realise that high fidelity copying is hard. Try it. Then you can thank God for his error correcting copying inside your cells. Have nice day.

@CaptainFantastic222

8 ай бұрын

@@theHentySkeptic Thanks for elaborating! What does this prove? That the “creator” can make errors?

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@theHentySkepticyou do realize that a lot of cancers and birth defects happen because your God’s error correcting copying fucked up right? If God made that then he made a few mistakes

In biology Information as defined by Francis Crick (co-discoverer of DNA) is the precise determination of sequence, either of bases in the nucleic acid or of amino-acid residues in the protein. Empirically observed non-intelligent evolutionary processes produce new genetic sequences which *by definition* are new information. Anyone want to offer the _creationist_ definition of information in biology or tell us why the accepted scientific definition is wrong?

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Actually, scientists are backing away from their own ideas of evolution because of the complexity of the universe, and even Darwin admitted he was probably wrong. Sorry. 😢 “It is asking a great deal of intelligent people to believe the theory which is not supported by evidence, just where evidence is most needed. Now these missing links, if there are any, should be more highly developed than the forms lower down in the scale from which they evolved, and therefore more able to continue. Then why not continue, if they ever evolved, while their weaker progenitors, less able to live, continue to this day?” -Darwin P.S. What you refer to as "magic" is actually provable in the new metaphysics, just because you haven't bothered to keep up with the science doesn't mean it's magic, anymore than primitive man would have believed a voice coming over a telephone to be "magic", you see, YOU are that primitive man...😮 Even science does not accept its own evidence. It took Christopher Columbus to prove the world was a sphere, yes, a Christian, while the pagan Catholic Scientists of the Inquisition said the world was flat and fire breathing dragons were waiting at the edges.😂😮. If these are "non intelligent evolutionary processes", then by very definition those people observing them possess no intelligence, as they are made up of the same non intelligent matter. An obvious conclusion.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 You've posted this same lie at least five different places on this vid. Do you thank lying will help get you into Heaven?

@m0x910

8 ай бұрын

That is a lie/incorrect, evolution works because of editorial processes acting on information that is already present/extant via mutations (additions, deletions, repetition etc). It does not produce whole new sets of info. Furthermore, an overwhelming portion of the time mutations end up corrupting the genes detrimentally rather than producing a useful/beneficial genome edition.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@m0x910 _It does not produce whole new sets of info._ Yes, it does. One well known example in biology is gene duplication followed by additional mutations to the copy. The original gene still performs the original function while the modified copy is free to explore new functions. There are whole college textbooks written on this.

@m0x910

8 ай бұрын

@@settledown444The text books I read list a myriad of genetic diseases and congenital defects that are directly caused by these mutations. Mutations, while occasionally may bring about benefit and advantage, are a judgement from God who created all life perfect and without corruption. We sinned and allowed death and decay/corruption into the genome of all life. Mutations overwhelmingly result in diseases, reduced function and death.

Once again, *Wrong Answers In Genesis* does not disappoint! 🤣 Firstly, the quote from Carl Sagan was in regard to the physical universe. He was not making any reference FOR or AGAINST anything spiritual, so it is simply being taken completely out of context here. Next the claim that atheists conclude that "God doesn't exist" is blatantly false. Unlike theists, we understand that any claim that a God DOES or DOES NOT exist is unfalsifiable. It cannot be proven either way, and is therefore a moot point. And finally, DNA is biochemistry, NOT a digital language! Man created the "language" associated with it as a tool to define, study, and understand it. If you want to learn something about actual science, do your own research in actual scientific journals, not the pseudo-science ignorance found here on KZread videos!

@calvinsmith7575

6 ай бұрын

Wrong, wrong and wrong. Sagan's quote stands as he said it. The word atheist literally comes from the Latin a- theos (no God), so modern atheists can dance around with semantics all they like, but when they are pinned down they admit they don't believe God exists. And DNA has been admitted to be a coded language system by top evolution believing scientists such as Dawkins and the Voices of Oxford (VOX). So if you want to claim things about science, why don't you go do some research before commenting...

There is a plenty evidence of a Creator existing. It's just kept hidden very well.:The same rules for mechanical and structural engineering that we use everywhere is also found inside plants and living things (body) it takes a designer to get that right. Also look at cars busses planes trains:left is mirror image of right in both front, side, top and back view. THis is same in bodies also animals. Coincidence no design.........

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

(cough cough) What about radial symmetry in jellyfish?

@globalcoupledances

8 ай бұрын

Is a crystal of sugar or salt designed?

@globalcoupledances

8 ай бұрын

"Creator existing" Yes and it's name is Evolution

DNA has sections that are rendered inactive by more recent sections like legs for snakes. Discuss.

@hylaherping9180

8 ай бұрын

They'll pretend that vestigial structures don't exist or since they have a function, they don't count. For embryological development, they'll just bring up gill slit development and ignore things like snake limb buds, whale limb buds and teeth buds in balleen whales, etc.

The humanist manifesto is an imagined excuse departed from reality to reach the narcissistic conclusion of “I am the greatest.”

@jockyoung4491

8 ай бұрын

The "humanist manifesto" is one guy's opinion. I doubt many "humanists" have even read it. And it has nothing to do with science.

Problem about discussions between "believers in Jesus Christ" and "unbelievers" is that the last ones can only become the first ones after God "turns to them". They can never become Christians because of discussions and only after God has opened their eyes, they will be able to see. This needs praying to God for help.

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

How do I get this god to open my eyes?

@wan4891

8 ай бұрын

@@Jewonastick Needs praying to God for help.

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

@@wan4891 why would an unbeliever pray to a god that he or she doesn't believe in?

@wan4891

8 ай бұрын

@@Jewonastick A catch of course but maybe a relative of him / her might do that (in secret....?)?

@jockyoung4491

8 ай бұрын

@@wan4891 Faith involves praying, but science does not. That's why they can't say anything about each other.

Calvin smith is a former youth pastor with no scientific qualifications. Yet here he is on the internet telling you that every evolutionary biologist, molecular biologist and geneticist, every ecologist, geologist, virologist and every bacteriologist in the history of the field of science are wrong about how DNA has evolved. Because that's his job. He is paid to present a specific literal interpretation of an ancient jewish text as fact. He is bound by an employment contract. Scientists are not bound to a contract that says they have to believe in a predetermined outcome. They simply go with the data and publish their findings. If Science discovered god, they'd tell us. If AIG discovered empirical evidence to prove the theory that life was born from abiogenesis, they'd dismiss it as a trick of the devil. Who would you trust?

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

Yep, and AIG even admits this in their "statement of faith"... If science conflicts with their religious beliefs they dismiss science.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Well, "scientists" employed by cigarette companies are bound that way too. But yeah.

@andrewdickson1556

8 ай бұрын

@@lizd2943 haha very true

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

@@lizd2943that’s a matter of integrity. In these cases, they are no better than Calvin and AiG.

You guys are wrong and the people in the chat from reddit are the true source of truth...

I do not believe any person is a true atheist. They, for whatever reason, do NOT want a God to exist. Some say, "I don't believe in anything I cannot see." Not factual. They breath air 24/7 everyday of their life on earth, and you cannot see AIR. We can see air doing things, but so can we see God doing things.

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

I am a true atheist, I don not believe in any god. Air can be measured, analized, moved, felt, captured and even created and seen with the help of some instruments. Air is demonstrably real....... gods are not. *"do NOT want a God to exist"* Nonsense and irrelevant. I don't cancer to be real yet I accept it as such as it is demonstrably real.

@stevendelucas6311

8 ай бұрын

Every single person is born an atheist. Until other people convince them otherwise.

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

We can see air. It’s made of atoms. We can see atoms. Also let me rephrase your statement to show you how flawed it is: I do not believe any person is a true theist. They, for whatever reason, do NOT want science to be true.” You see how wrong that sounds? I’m sure you believe God exists because you claim it. Please don’t pretend to know my thoughts better than I do.

@HannahsCats-zp6rb

7 ай бұрын

Everyone is born and atheist. Then other people convince them to believe their particular beliefs. Depends on when/where you're born.

God was teaching us how to use DNA evidence in a crime scene when He said something like this to Cain, " your brother Abel's blood was crying out to Me when you killed him."

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Which only works because DNA shows us how organisms are related.

@leroyjenkins3744

7 ай бұрын

Ah yes I love it when I do DNA analysis and the blood just screams at me

How is "information" only ever observed as coming from an intelligent source? The ripples on a sandy beach carry information about the direction and force of the waves that made them, but no intelligent source was involved in making them. If Mr. Smith wants to argue that *_some type_* of information are only ever observed as coming from a "mind", then he is welcome to do so, but the specific type of information that is generated by minds is not apparent in DNA, and therefore cannot serve as evidence that DNA was somehow produced by a "mind". If Mr. Smith wants to argue that there is only one type of information, then he should be able to explain how the ripples in a sandy beach are produced by a mind. If he can't do that, his argument fails.

@mattdillon4398

8 ай бұрын

You're actually serious, aren't you? You would stoop to an argument so ridiculous and childish to make your point? No one talks about ripples on a sandy beach because they are random! They are evidence of something that has happened. They do not instruct the ocean! DNA is code. It is the instruction book for all life and it is extremely complex. So much so that scientists cannot even come close to making even a single cell.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@mattdillon4398 Please give your definition of "code". I guarantee it won't be the one science uses to describe DNA.

@mattdillon4398

8 ай бұрын

@@settledown444 Code is a system that uses symbols or letters to transmit information. Everyone knows this. DNA does this.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@mattdillon4398 Major fail for you. DNA does not use symbols or letters to transmit information. Codons are molecules which follow the laws of chemistry and physics to produce other molecules. There is no abstract symbology anywhere in the process.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Symbols and letters are social constructs. DNA is not a social construct.@@mattdillon4398

Explain then why a creator needed make DNA with many corrections in it.

@m0x910

8 ай бұрын

The Creator made creation perfect (read Genesis) we were once immortal until we the creation corrupted everything with sin, then death and decay were a reality. People lived till they were about 900+ years old in those days. Now we a happy if we make it past 80. We are very poor and corrupted copies/reflections of Adam and Eve who were prime genetic specimens before they sinned. To answer your question: our incorrect, compromised and faulty genes are the result of our sin. “The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord” Romans 6:23.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Ok, now show any evidence for this claim. @@m0x910

@LeonSemiPro

8 ай бұрын

@@m0x910 I'm talking about all animals. DNA is made mostly of corrections. That supports evolution and definitely not perfection.

@CaptainFantastic222

8 ай бұрын

@@m0x910perfect? 90% of human DNA is redundant or not used junk dna. What about genetic mutations? Perfect??? I don’t think so

You dudes f-ing hate Dawkins. You just bring him up all the time.

"Is there any information inherent in sugar?" Yes. Matter does, in fact, have inherent information content. When you look at a bunch of sugar, you are getting information. This simple factual observation destroys AIG's argument.

@stephenleonhardt7526

8 ай бұрын

You completely missed the point he was making.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

No, he was just wrong about information.@@stephenleonhardt7526

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

@@stephenleonhardt7526which is what? A point which is easily dismantled?

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

They don't know. They just have to say something.@@Bomtombadi1

@stephenleonhardt7526

8 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 The information that is inherent to sugar is not the information that is conveyed in the example in the video. Suppose there are hundreds of copies of the same four books laid out on a field to spell out the Gettysburg Address when seen from the air. The information the books contain have nothing to do with the message that someone used them to spell out. Even if the books themselves could have come about by some natural means (good luck with that), their arrangement carries information and information only comes from a mind.

Oh dear. Another watchmaker argument for a ‘creator’ as boring and as non convincing as all those that went before.

Satan is a liar who has deceived the whole world (Revelation 12: 9). God is patient, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance (2 Peter 3: 9). God want's to reason with you. “Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD: though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool. -Isaiah 1: 18 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. -Romans 10: 9 God bless you all.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

Actually the "christian" religion says a great many things including a vast litany of absurdities, contradictions and outright lies. Suspiciously it also says that if you cannot or will not believe its unreasonable demands then your fate will be horrible eternal living death. BTW god did not raise jesus from the dead. You can't kill a god. Jesus didn't die. Since god is omniscient and knew all of this in advance, the whole thing is a ridiculous charade.

@adamsanchez9288

8 ай бұрын

@@rf7477 Hey rf, thanks for the reply! You are correct, Jesus is God and God cannot die. But Jesus is God wrapped in human flesh as a man, so He can bleed and die. Jesus Christ came into the world to save us from our sin by His blood shed on the cross. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen His glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. -John 1: 14 For there is one God, and there is one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, -1 Timothy 2: 5 For in Him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, -Colossians 2: 9 The fact that God did wrap Himself in flesh means that He would have blood that could be shed for our sins as the law requires. God is justly satisfied the law. In fact, the law requires that nearly everything be cleansed with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness. -Hebrews 9: 22 For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it for you on the altar to make atonement for your souls, for it is the blood that makes atonement by the life. -Leviticus 17: 9 But He was pierced for our transgressions, He was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on Him, and by His wounds we are healed. -Isaiah 53: 5 Sorry for the long reply, there are a lot more scriptures talking about the important topic of Jesus' blood, but that is the jist of it. You make other good points, if you want I can reply to your concern about "horrible eternal living death". You are also right, it is horrible. I hope you are well.

@rf7477

8 ай бұрын

@@adamsanchez9288 Unhappily your reply sounds like standard "christian" dogma that begs more questions than it answers. Your religion seems like a blood cult. Sacrifice, then human sacrifice and then virgin human sacrifice leads inexorably to blood sacrifice of a virgin god-child of a virgin. An ugly archaic notion. So, which bits of jesus were organic and which bits were divine? Where did the divine bits wait while the organic bits lay in a tomb? How do you wrap organic bits about an invisible entity? What exactly does resurrection imply since it is quite common in the bible. Paul resurrects Eutychus. Actually Paul never met jesus but seems to promote his own theology which does not include virgin birth. jesus is never mentioned nor implied in the OT. In fact the messiah is said to be the son of David, an organic man. It was "christianity" that decided that he had to be the son of god AND have a virgin birth. A fatal contradiction The OT does not have nor imply hell. "christians" seem to have reinvented an earlier Egyptian 'lake of fire'. In genesis god also has several sons who do something on Earth that looks suspiciously like pack grape. Finally, the "christian" religion very clearly threatens eternal damnation via living death for those who cannot believe this stuff. That is amoral. You cannot deduce morals or ethics from an amoral notion. I only need one answer from you: if your god is omniscient then he knew all of this in advance. What is the point of this charade?

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

Evil existed before Adam and Eve ate their apple

Many simple animals have DNA more than 10 times the size of human DNA.

@christianlanoire-ep6zi

8 ай бұрын

So?

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

SO AIG's claims about information and DNA are incorrect. They're also incorrect because calling DNA language is a metaphor. Languages are symbolic social constructs. DNA is chemistry. Information is, in fact, inherent in any matter and is not metapjhysical.@@christianlanoire-ep6zi

@LeonSemiPro

8 ай бұрын

@@christianlanoire-ep6zi DNA charts an evolutionary journey. Most of DNA is corrective genes. Definitely not a perfect creation.

@Henrik46

8 ай бұрын

​@@LeonSemiProThat's the evolutionary perspective, which treats all DNA it doesn't understand as "junk". Creationists view all DNA as basically good, with possible corruption here and there. The evidence points to the latter.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Nope. We know what most noncoding DNA is, and it is junk. There's some we still don't know what it is and that's the area where they're finding new functions.@@Henrik46

Anything that changes the arrangement of DNA creates information. Mutation and selection do exactly that. You can only say that information can only come from an intelligent source if you deny the fact that life did it over 3 billion years ago. And you can't deny the fact that life did it over 3 billion years ago by claiming that it can only come from an intelligent source.

@jonathanb9889

8 ай бұрын

"..if you deny the fact that life did it over 3 billion years ago."

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Show me a dog that changed into a cat, or a horse that changed into a cow in your evolutionary process. Oh, you accept that on blind faith, so it's your religion. All evolutionists can show is slight adaptations within species, that's about it, and I can accept that. But the rest is absolute Hocus pocus blind faith and missing links.

@franktinashe5406

8 ай бұрын

​@@notsure1582Indeed it's hocus pocus.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 The fossil record clearly depicts whales evolving from terrestrial mammals. Birds evolved from large avian dinosaurs. Humans evolved from hominids. The evidence is apparent and this is a scientific fact.

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

​@@notsure1582Why mention dogs to cats or horses to cows when that is NOT what science says? Where does anyone claim that this happened?

Evolutionists' View on DNA Do Make Sense - BUT you must have at least a high school education!!! This is a religious site -- so - haha You must try to prove gods exist!!!!

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Actually, scientists are backing away from their own ideas of evolution because of the complexity of the universe, and even Darwin admitted he was probably wrong. Sorry. 😢 “It is asking a great deal of intelligent people to believe the theory which is not supported by evidence, just where evidence is most needed. Now these missing links, if there are any, should be more highly developed than the forms lower down in the scale from which they evolved, and therefore more able to continue. Then why not continue, if they ever evolved, while their weaker progenitors, less able to live, continue to this day?” -Darwin P.S. What you refer to as "magic" is actually provable in the new metaphysics, just because you haven't bothered to keep up with the science doesn't mean it's magic, anymore than primitive man would have believed a voice coming over a telephone to be "magic", you see, YOU are that primitive man...😮 Even science does not accept its own evidence. It took Christopher Columbus to prove the world was a sphere, yes, a Christian, while the pagan Catholic Scientists of the Inquisition said the world was flat and fire breathing dragons were waiting at the edges.😂😮. When fascists come to America they will wrap themselves in the American flag, and pretend to be Christians carrying crosses, but they are wolves in sheep's clothing.

@bigbabatunde1218

8 ай бұрын

Many PhD 'evolutionists' have said spectacular own goal and embarrassing things concerning 'evolution' and how it is taught. If they can't 100% convince their own side then why are you gulping down the 'evolutionary' Kool aid?

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

​@@notsure1582scientist don't doubt evolution and neither did darwin.

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

@@notsure1582 You've posted this same lie at least five different places on this vid. Do you thank lying will help get you into Heaven?

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

The Earth was known to be a sphere long before Columbus. The main objection to his voyage was that he was going to run out of supplies before reaching Asia because he thought the world was a lot smaller than it really is. And he would have if he hadn't blundered into another pair of continents people in his society didn't know about. Tons of transitional forms have been found since Darwin's day. Complexity is not a design indicator, and scientists are not backing away from evolution. Sorry.@@notsure1582

Calvin has not clue what the "evolutionist's view" is on anything. Yes, the arrangement of DNA base pairs is what contains information. No, this does not require an intelligent mind. Genetic variation and natural selection accomplish the same thing: code that works.

@notsure1582

8 ай бұрын

Who wrote the Code? The boogey man?😂

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

​@@notsure1582that's what you believe... The origin of the first DNA is unknown. However the mechanism that causes DNA to "write itself" is known. Science KNOWS how new genetic information can arrive.

@bryant475

8 ай бұрын

​@@JewonastickLook up Dr. James Tour - Origin of Life studies. No one has ever or will ever demonstrate that the precursor molecules for life came about by chance, the likelihood of this occurring is basically zero. As a biochemist, med student, soon to he doctor- the more I studied the intricacies of biology/biochemistry, the more I appreciated God's handiwork! Dr. Hugh Ross is another scientist to look into, he focuses more on the macro- he's an astrophysicist. God bless :)

@mattdillon4398

8 ай бұрын

I always wonder why so many atheists are in the comment section of a creation video. Can you explain why? Are you trying to save people from believing in God and bringing some sense of meaning to their lives or are you trying to prove to yourself that He is not real? If Christians believe in a fairytale and have been proven wrong for 200 years now, what is your purpose here? Why do you care? Since most of academia and people are on your side why not just ignore them? It always amazes me how furiously atheists fight to defend their beliefs while at the same time believing that life has no meaning.

@Jewonastick

8 ай бұрын

@@mattdillon4398 Sorry that we actually care about the truth... Creationism is built upon lies. All these KZread creationists accounts LIE about established science. This isn't about believing in a god... This is about spreading misinformation and creating a distrust in science and that can eventually have a negative effect on the society that we all are part of.

If you write "My name is..." on a blackboard, there is no information there. It only means something in the understood context of speaking English. And when you smear the chalk, that meaning goes away, but the amount of information (randomness) increases. And it is a serious error to extrapolate evolution to the beginning of time or the end, because evolution is first of all a description of how life operates today. We have no other experience to base it on. All scientific theories break when you extrapolate them to infinity. There is no such thing as an atheists bible, that is ridiculous projection. The only agreement is that the received text of your bible is not the Word of God. Careful Bible scholarship reveals that the Book of Genesis was written in the 6th century BC during the Captivity, and it is a collection of fables cunningly designed to capture the favor of the Persian King Cyrus who had conquered Babylon.

The big difference here is that a naturalist would say that information could possibly create itself but we don’t know how and can’t prove it. The creationists that run this channel lie about evolution and abiogenesis and then make a huge leap and say it must have been God. Make that make sense

@settledown444

8 ай бұрын

We do know how natural non-intelligent processes produce new genetic information. Have known for almost 70 years.

@lizd2943

8 ай бұрын

Mutation changing DNA creates information all the time, but they'll just say that doesn't count because Reasons.

Well done for lying

@oldtimerlee8820

8 ай бұрын

Thank you for supporting this channel. Every time you view, click the negative button and add a comment, you aid in the factors that help this channel grow.

@Moist._Robot

8 ай бұрын

@@oldtimerlee8820 The more people that watch this nonsense, the more stupid apologists look. Win win.

@Choraldiscourse

8 ай бұрын

Do you have a reasonable argument?

@kevinburke1325

8 ай бұрын

He isn't lying dumb dumb.

@CupOfSweetTea

8 ай бұрын

@@oldtimerlee8820 the channel has limited growth potential as most see through the rubbish

Creationists: “Information can’t come from nowhere. Therefore: Yahweh, the ancient storm/war deity of the Canaanite pantheon, is creator of the universe”. Make that make sense…

@black-cross

8 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@black-cross

8 ай бұрын

why not Yahweh? what year is it? why is it? why did the all world agree to it? if we were here for 100s of thousands of years we wouldnt fit on the planet. make the math

@stevenbatke2475

8 ай бұрын

@@black-cross why not Baal, why not Asherah?

@black-cross

8 ай бұрын

@@stevenbatke2475 I just answered your question. What year is it? Why is it?

@Bomtombadi1

8 ай бұрын

@@black-crossare you so stupid to think that people live and die? Or do you think life just infinitely expands? You do the math

THERE NEVER WAS AND NEVER WILL BE A GOD

@Sound9ine

8 ай бұрын

You'll know how much of a mistake you made once you die

@Jraethyme

8 ай бұрын

If you have your own beliefs why get mad at other people's beliefs. Being mad when something is brought up can hint at someone's past

@velkyn1

8 ай бұрын

@@Sound9ine ah, nothing like impotent threats.

@velkyn1

8 ай бұрын

@@Jraethyme because those beliefs of yours cause real harm.

@markmerry1471

8 ай бұрын

I'M DON'T HAVE ANY I JUST FACE FACTS AND THAT IS SOME THINK YOU LOT WILL NOT DO@@Jraethyme