My mum doesn't think we're evolved from monkeys she thinks were evolving in to monkeys

@Chemike21

4 жыл бұрын

Quite sadly, this has more evidence than that of humans coming from monkeys. As they have 0.

@alyssahansen1400

4 жыл бұрын

@Adolf Hitler You have a rather fitting username I suppose.

@LiLiKOiOiOi

4 жыл бұрын

She ain’t wrong about that

@ishthefish9006

4 жыл бұрын

Its not a monkey lol scientist claim we had a common ancestor of a chimpanzee and evolved separately

@ishthefish9006

4 жыл бұрын

We're barely if any related to the monkey species

TLDR; We didn't evolve from modern day ape we just have a common ancestor

@user-ki1un4jg2d

3 ай бұрын

Really ? And where is the photo of that common ancestor ?

I want to see a fossil of species X

@Tokmurok

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, where are the fossils from our ancestors? They hardley have any bones of proto humans they have a few, that can he explained by anomaly, or a defective human. I expect thousands like dinosaur bones.

@COOCONUT

3 жыл бұрын

@Khan Muskan 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😐😐😐😐 funny

@JohnFoxx108

3 жыл бұрын

@@Tokmurok If you believe dinosaurs are genuine. Science and the government would never lie to us, right? Just like our go-cart on Mars Lol

@Tokmurok

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnFoxx108 probably not real yeah, do you have any good channels to reccomend cause infos hardn to find and not everyone uploads on other websites

@dafamousrh

3 жыл бұрын

@@JohnFoxx108 in a museum it displays real dinosaur bones. How is it fake?

We explore evolution in our latest video - why do monkeys still exist and how have we branched away from them to become a new species?

@LutherusPXCs

9 жыл бұрын

You have started a flame war my friend.

@7ashoBeam

9 жыл бұрын

It does not happen over generations it happens not at all. It is just imagination, but you already know that, right?

@IronSquid501

9 жыл бұрын

Jasho Beam I was going to reply to your comment until I clicked on your profile and realized you're a troll. Successful trolling was successful. Unless you're just stupid, of course, in which case I'm sorry for your loss.

@7ashoBeam

9 жыл бұрын

IronSquid501 Yes, but I am a good troll here to help those suffering from the brainwashing of evolution. I do hope you are not one of them as that would be one less head case to deal with.

@IronSquid501

9 жыл бұрын

Jasho Beam Unfortunetely, due to Evolution being an observable thing that was proven hundreds of years ago by Chinese blokes and their pet fish and has been re-proven every year since, I am already a lost case and am utterly convinced about Evolution. Good luck saving others, though.

One of our favourite subjects here at Earth Unplugged Towers, well done chaps :-)

@ruvimbond2310

5 жыл бұрын

You all need to that know evolution is just ONE possibility, and that there is a change that God exists and he created everything and everyone

@whoareyou2339

5 жыл бұрын

@@ruvimbond2310 lmao well your a fake sack of religious shit

@michaelhayes8989

5 жыл бұрын

That is right

@AbhishekGupta-pg6ib

3 жыл бұрын

Well done chaMps :-)

@CrazeCreativesHQ

3 жыл бұрын

You love ❤️ Tim Allen

Why is there still a debate about this?

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

Because Ignorance and, in some cases stupidity, are embedded in the DNA of some people.

@banido

9 жыл бұрын

because there's still an abundance of stupid people out there thanks to religions

@Shangori

9 жыл бұрын

***** Religion. Or rather, the stubbornness of some to accept new information. People don't accept new things for a variaty of reasons, most of them involve 'not liking' the implications of the new information. They just want the world to be a certain way and can't accept reality for what it is. You can call it stupidity, not accepting the new information even if it helps progress. It's what I call it

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

Shangori That's the correct name for it. Although, I would accentuate it with a few choice adjectives.

@SargeRho

9 жыл бұрын

There isn't, really.The only places there is still a debate is in the US, and in ultra-religious nations.

So that's why lemurs make such good pirates.

@DaFan86

9 жыл бұрын

You have just won the internet sir, nicely done.

@DrAdityaReddy

4 жыл бұрын

😂

Nice coincidence that I just happened to be drinking orange juice while watching this. Well played, Evolution.

Gotta love this guy's astute way of explaining the topic

Good to see Greg back! They need to get back to making more head squeeze vids

@GregFoot

9 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

Don't know how I got to this video but subbed as it answered a question I didn't know I needed the answer to.

Alright guys, stop complaining about this being a base-level kind of science. True I did know how evolution worked, and that we didn't descend from monkeys, they evolved at the same time as we did (more or less) but I still found this a very interesting video. Thank you HeadSqueeze, for making a video that was easy to understand, interesting, and fun to watch. I particularily found the fact about Vitamin C thing quite interesting :3

can anyone point to one fossil or discovery that supports this video

@lanceb7512

3 жыл бұрын

A simple Google search would give you evidence to support this.

@sampanzee5684

3 жыл бұрын

I could point to 1000's of reserch papers, books, people and hard evidence.

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

Just look up the dozent of extinct hominin species. A funny case is Homo habilis. Were not even creationst are sure if its a human or ape.

@mycolemae

3 жыл бұрын

If we evolved from monkeys then why aren’t mokeys turning into humans today, the world has forgot its creator WHICH IS GOD THE ALMIGHTY 👑✝️!

@AshMos

3 жыл бұрын

@@mycolemae did you even watch the video

i love the way you brits pronounce vitamins

@lucasmckenzie8525

3 жыл бұрын

VITTAMINZZZ

Great episode!

@GregFoot

9 жыл бұрын

Cheers!

fantastic! Very well explained.

"That's why you'll never see a lemur with scurvy"....I've never seen ANYTHING or ANYONE with scurvy!

so here is the REAL question...what environmental change could have possibly caused species "x" to evolve our most important feature (our large pre-frontal cortex)? obviously evolution works on a meet immediate needs basis (eg colder climate=more fur, or more challenging to hunt prey= better eyesight). so how in the hell did evolution suddenly work towards our brain situation? obviously evolution didn't go "hey if i evolve a larger pre-frontal cortex I will eventually to be able to build things, and deductively reason, and contemplate my own existence!"...kinda worth pondering

@coopersisters4

2 жыл бұрын

yeah I agree. why does no other animal have a brain like ours?

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

Can be something as simple as having new predators in the area. The ones who were dumb enough to attack it...died and didn't reproduce.

If evolution is real, how did we evolve the people who go on Jerry Springer and Jeremy Kyle? I think it's proof that there is a god and he/she has a sick sense of humor.

@midnight_x7976

3 жыл бұрын

God is a male and goddess is a female

@BojanBojovic

3 жыл бұрын

@@midnight_x7976 Santa is a male as well.

@midnight_x7976

3 жыл бұрын

@@BojanBojovic lol

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

Your beliefs are irrelevant. Evolution is not a faith based belief system/religion. It is OBSERVED

2:30 oh dont know shi7 but ok still go with it

@mr.hazamayukiterumi2909

3 жыл бұрын

Ok??

This made more sense idk why I don’t understand stuff when people just explain it to me I feel so stupid but seeing it makes sense to me

"Sometime in the past before there were humans and chimps there was another species, lets call it species x. We dont exactly know what that common ancestor or species was or when it lived but at some point that species split into two"..........okay 😂😂😂

@gargola1887

4 жыл бұрын

Lmfaooo RIGHT

@bbella98

4 жыл бұрын

Jim Lahey yeah right 😂 this theory has so many flaws

@mxkhxi

4 жыл бұрын

we don't know because it's extinct and we most likely wouldn't be able to differentiate it too much from other known species to identify it, moron.

@kazamlovesmusic

4 жыл бұрын

That's what I'm saying... so like a maybe a chimp and a homo sapien had sex and created a "baby" which became us? WHAT. It doesn't make ANY sense at all.

@mxkhxi

4 жыл бұрын

Kathleen Woll no. we share a common ancestor with chimps. we are not the offspring of chimps. that common ancestor branched off multiple ways through mutations which eventually became evolution as they gave us advantages, and we became so different that we could no longer mate with our ancestors.

Thank you! That was very imformative, I think Steve Harvey needs to see this vid lol

You totally destroyed the argument! Hilarious.

Religious people are just slightly more advanced flat earthers

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

They sell more succesful books.

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

Actually the only flerfers on earth are YEC Christians and Muslims. So they're directly linked

My Christian friends asked me this same question, I just sent 'em this video

@frizzysmandem4653

4 жыл бұрын

코어잼스톤 well your Cristian freind is right

@lucasphillips2177

4 жыл бұрын

Frizzys Mandem nope U and him (his friend) both don’t understand basic science

@aguy481

4 жыл бұрын

@@lucasphillips2177 : "so basically im MONKEY"

@M0NK3YST1CK

4 жыл бұрын

@A A Yes, it does have holes, just like many other scientific theories. That doesn't discredit its credibility and utility because of all the empirical evidence supporting it, unlike religious hypotheses about our origins which have zero empirical evidence supporting them.

@M0NK3YST1CK

4 жыл бұрын

@A A You should try understanding it first, then worry about trusting it. But here's a fact: Religious creation myths have zero empirical evidence supporting them. Blind belief is all they have going for them.

Thanks, I always wondered why I don't see lemurs with scurvy. JK nice video systematically breaking down that misconception.

If blue and red make purple, why do will still have blue and red?

Common ancestor maybe a bit too much of a detailed concept for those attacking evolution. Remember, it's not the scientists that question evolution like this, it's always the creationists. Their worldview does not permit processes to take place, but rather a magical spark that jump started everything exactly as-is in a static model that does not contain enough data to form a predictive model.

@m.yasiralishah7534

2 жыл бұрын

So what about the 2nd law of thermodynamics, and here evolution is trying to prove that everything is getting order😄

@frosted1030

2 жыл бұрын

@@m.yasiralishah7534 "So what about the 2nd law of thermodynamics" What? Are you really saying that you think the second law of thermodynamics has something to do with some magic man in the sky suddenly making everything living everywhere, from nothing? "and here evolution is trying to prove that everything is getting order" This demonstrates your total lack of comprehension of something you could have taken six seconds to look up. Not sure the level of stupidity here, but let's play. You cite thermodynamics with no study, so let's break this down for you in simple terms. The law you mention discusses specifically thermodynamic (heat) units within ISOLATED SYSTEMS and the detailed observation that the total number of entropies in those systems does not change. In layman's terms Earth is not an isolated system. Entropy (also known as chaos in physics) is a movement within a system toward a state of equilibrium. Like when your mother blows up a balloon for you. The air does not hang out in one section of the balloon, it spreads out equally. Not sure why you think this has anything to do with the complexity of a system, or how that relates to the changes in allele frequency, but do show how you know nothing about biology and chemistry. This is one of those "stupid theist" comments. You should be ashamed.

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

​@@m.yasiralishah7534 prove the earth is a closed system with the sun inside our atmosphere. This is the O N L Y way the 2nd law of thermodynamics would be valid here

@boldfaithministry8853

Жыл бұрын

The "static species" concept is rather outdated among creationists now. Most of today's creationists would likely agree with microevolution, but not with macroevolution.

When someone asks me the beginning question, I usually answer with parallels to religion: When christianity evolved from judaism, why are there still jews? Its basically the same reason. Similarly it is possible to explain the old question "who was the first human then?" Who was the first christian? Jesus himself was a Jew as his parents, his followers were jews as their parents and as their kids, but from generation to generation of followers the ideas slightly changed more and more until they saw themself not longer as jews, but as christians. But in every generation they could identify with the people coming before them and the people coming after them...

@DrZalmat

9 жыл бұрын

:-D

@zytolen5356

3 жыл бұрын

@@andreaowens4959 I mean all three called Abrahamic religion for a reason, Jesus is one of Islam and Judaism messengers. They are all related just in a tiny differences which made big ones through the time to a point where we call them different names.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

@@andreaowens4959 jesus isn't the founder of Christianity haha. It was Paul... All Christians agree it's Paul. Jesus was there to say he wasn't changing anything....then Paul tried to change things

@1994mrmysteryman

2 жыл бұрын

You're equating biology and DNA to... changes in belief?

@DrZalmat

2 жыл бұрын

@@1994mrmysteryman yes, because there is not much difference. Both are gradual changes over time some do and some stay the way they were. You also could ask: if Americans came from Englishmen why are there still people in England? same concept. You don't need to understand genetics to understand evolution

excellent!

Excellent

So the long and short of it, we don't know. 🤦‍♂️

@delet3999

3 жыл бұрын

We know. Some species stay the same. Some change. Sharks have been the same for thousands of years now

@Kraken54321

3 жыл бұрын

@bdidbw yes. 👍

As an addition a species that descends from another species does not necessesarily have to wipe out the other species. It's possible for the old species to survive as well because the habitat they were adapted for still exists but their ancestors developed for a different habitat

@degaussingatmosphericcharg575

4 жыл бұрын

Irish Yes, it is real but we are not "supposed" to find chimps closer to us; no one is evolving into us. All populations are adapting to their unique environments; adaptation is evolution. Also, evolution simply means change over time, it is not a march toward perfection. Even a loss or diminishing of function is considered evolution .

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

@JOSHWONDUDE there's no cause for this though, chimps thrive in their environment. Evolution is real...I'm gonna assume you've been raised in some religious background here. Science is just the description of the known world that we can observe. All the data, even DNA alone points to this.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

@JOSHWONDUDE id go do a bit more soul searching before you waste your life on Jesus.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

@JOSHWONDUDE oh I got forced to learn all that bullshit as a child.

Is evolutionary branching a slow process? Is it possible for a group to have human, chimp, and Species X characteristics?

Thanks for such an informative video!

But why do they split off in the first place?

@exyronylfa

4 жыл бұрын

natural selection, habitat, way of life, how they face danger etc

@M0NK3YST1CK

4 жыл бұрын

He explained it with the example of finches. One island ends up with majority pointy beaks, while the other island ends up with majority wide beaks. This "split" happened due to the nuts and whatever food example in the video. The difference between the two populations is what warrants treating them as two newly created species.

@kijul468

4 жыл бұрын

@A A Yes, and they never will stop being finches. This doesn't contradict evolution.

@kijul468

4 жыл бұрын

@A A Look at a phylogenetic tree. You will see organisms branching off. Every daughter clade belongs to a parant clade which belongs to a parent clade. The daughter clades never stop being what their parent clades are. It is a nested hierarchy. And what you said implies that because they are still finches, evolution is false, but evolution doesn't say they will be anything other than finches. There are multiple species of finch, and as you said they are all still finches. So then, speciation has occurred or else how can their be multiple species? You should know that speciation falls into macroevolution since macroevoltuion is evolution on and/or above the species level. So you, are in fact accepting macroevolution without actually even knowing it.

@kijul468

4 жыл бұрын

@A A Yes you do believe in macroevolution. You said "They are still finches" which implies you are saying they come from a common ancestor, but are still finches. There are multiple species fo finches, so there has been speciation occur. Macroevolution is evolution on or/and above the species level. So yes. You do accept macroevolution, you just don't realise it. It's not too complicated though, is it?Mutations happen, and you cannot deny that. Mutations affect the expression of traits, and you cannot deny that. There are traits that are better for certain things. And you cannot deny that. Long legs and skinny limbs are great for running in hot climates. In fact, it's from these hot climates that the huge majority of long distance runners are from. The climate is part of the environment, and the environment is what filters the bad traits from the good.

Species x you say? Do not know much about this species aye? Not sure when or if aye??? Interesting

@sampanzee5684

3 жыл бұрын

You're getting upset over one tiny thing that we don't know yet your entire religion is built of things you don't know. This is just way to much hypocracy to handle.

Can anyone give me proof of this? If you don't know the common ancestor how can it be a fact that both of us descended from it?

oh wow i didn't know ! i am so glad you explained it to me! i feel so dumb now :( yet verry happy that i learned something.

When science can't explain evolution so they make up a mystery species with no evidence of them actually being around.

@matthewbottger9328

4 жыл бұрын

ieat caribou amen, someone speaking facts out here

@shadattack

4 жыл бұрын

ieat caribou Bless your heart 😂

@edmundshan4

4 жыл бұрын

You shouldn't put yourself down you're not a mystery species,you're Homo sapiens sapiens

@nickkennedy6072

4 жыл бұрын

I hope that's satire and not your actual belief lol

@siradmin6791

4 жыл бұрын

Okay then explain to me how giraffes gained long necks without evolution?

The thing is, Creationists aren't asking this question because they want an answer, they're asking it because they want to put people on the defensive. If you give a compelling answer, they'll ignore it and move to another subject. The game for them is to keep you in the argument, forcing you to work hard trying to provide data while they smirk at you and provide nothing. They're not interested in your answers, what they are aiming for is an apparent victory gained by breaking their opponents temper or keeping the thing going until their opponent is to forced to leave the discussion (in order to get on with his/her life) so they can post a last line unchallenged.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

Here, here.

@bornnaked2928

9 жыл бұрын

The same description would hold true for a troll. lol But its close to impossible, to convince somebody who does not want to know the truth. And as long as they don´t expect me to believe in their gods, I don´t really mind what they believe.

@TheNugettinage

9 жыл бұрын

Recently had an argument with a creationist on KZread that would not accept anything I said. It was quite hilarious when I presented him with basic logic, and he said that I was incorrect just because I was using the logic to prove such things as evolution and the validity of the scientific method. This attitude is known as a cognitive distortion in psychological circles by the way, ignoring any evidence that goes against what you think and having the general idea that "I think it, therefore it is."

@SenpaiTorpidDOW

9 жыл бұрын

fez Hear hear?

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

Ryan Hutton OOPS. My mistake.

Long time no see, ***** .

we need more monke

I love how people present their opinion as a statement like they 100% know. The truth is no one knows. That’s why it’s called a theory or a belief.

@stateofcarter4140

2 жыл бұрын

For real

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

In science a theory is not a belief. It is an explanation of a fucking observed fact/process

As an atheist and general science enthusiast, I hate videos about evolution. Why? Because these videos all make perfect sense to people who already understood evolution, but not to the religious and ignorant who should really be understanding this. It is extremely frustrating to see ignorant individuals showing up en masse to show us that the world is still populated by backwards thinking people.

@anti-ugandaknucklescrusade727

5 жыл бұрын

You're a backward thinking person

I need to know what species x was. I'm just curious like that.

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

There are possible fossil animals for the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor. Like Graecopithecus or Ardipithecus. But it extremly hard to be sure if it is any of these ancestrial liniages or if the 100% exact ancestor will ever be known.

Very good to understand.Thank you.But I have a question that humans and chimpanges came from a common ancestor.Are you sure that we came from that ancestor or a concept?Plz.

Evolution isn't a line graph. It's a tree!

@se6369

2 жыл бұрын

The picture is simplified, not wrong

No offense but, what is the target audience here? 10-12 year olds?

@SSmotzer

9 жыл бұрын

People who ask this question.

@banido

9 жыл бұрын

you underestimate the number of ignorant people out there, plus there's still religious groups indoctrinating people about creationism

@Lawless1960

9 жыл бұрын

If any of the content was interesting or entertaining, then it is for you. Did you learn anything new. I think it is very well produced.

@Markus9705

9 жыл бұрын

banido There are seriously Creationists in 2014?

@RobinK

9 жыл бұрын

TheLeftLibertarianAtheist Unfortunately, there are.

We don't know much about the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans, and then going on to use that common ancestor to explain things sound bit like a magic trick.

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

Evolution predicts that all life had a commen anceror. DNA predicts that that this Split between human and chimps appened 7-6 million years ago. We have fossils if the liniage before it splited. With the commen traits and the fossils, can we know a lot abour this species x. I We could msby even allredy found iz. But without DNA testing, is it impossible to 100% conform that

I have a question: Why do we forget memories that we had remembered a moment before?

@zytolen5356

3 жыл бұрын

Because it is a junk

@zytolen5356

3 жыл бұрын

no u

@isayuhlakersman8441

2 жыл бұрын

@@zytolen5356 It's a joke

I call it Ehh-vill-ooh-shin.

But that missing/unknown piece of information regarding "species x" could make the whole theory of evolution collapse, perhaps. I dont know in what sense or structure ,but it is possible, boyond our reasoning and comprehension. Possible that our whole perception of human origin is only a subjective understanding, (false maybe), subjective comprehention of all the information gathered to thus far in our times.

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

No. The chimpanzee-human last common ancestor. Even if we will never find this exact species has no impact in the validity of evolution. We have a whole lineage of human-chimp anecstors, inclouding even the possible "species X" Besides the clear morphological and gentic links between chimps and humans, sgows the human evolutionary tree a clear transtion from "chimp" like origins, to modern humans.

@Damhnaic_28

3 жыл бұрын

When mankind is thinking beyond average thinking, they start to form theories and will forever stay theory. Not convincing, especially this "Specie X" it became vague. Not greatly logical anymore. All are speculations. If we all came from star dusts, then where the smallest particle came from that caused the big bang? Most of astrophysicist will just say "it's just there" wait whaa!?? Believing that God CREATED everything is more convincing for me. Creations doesn't require materials and no humans can create, they only invent and speculate.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

@@Damhnaic_28 it's dumb though right ? Evolution has fuck all to do with the big bang or how life began. If you want to be anti science, stop using KZread. All the data we have points towards this...if you want to add god and say it's his plan and he's looking over us...that's fine. Just don't vote with your faith. Why would you put trust in "faith" when you acknowledge that every God has only existed on faith...all of them would have to exist. I assume you've been rbought up in a religious background so it's really not your fault. But that is a local issue ..the whole scientific world agrees with evolution...has done for at least a century.

@UniDocs_Mahapushpa_Cyavana

Жыл бұрын

If you see twins call each other twins, so you need proof of their parent? 😕

Why this time monkey doesn't evolve?and Why only two species?

When the mystery van came, scooby doo came out for the monkeys and Shaggy for the humans haha

BBC SCIENCE: We dont have any evidence but you dont know any better so you'll believe us anyway.

@giannagarcia2878

4 жыл бұрын

Christian logic 101

@fastlane005

4 жыл бұрын

But no one knows anything and you have no evidence for Adam and Eve.

@malekOwner

4 жыл бұрын

@@fastlane005 we have the Quran

@codysizemore7421

4 жыл бұрын

@@fastlane005 Neither side has evidence.

@malekOwner

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ace93022 There are 11 bible book and there's only 1 Quran so no they are not the same.

Man, the fact of the matter is... None of us will ever 100% truly know what happened back then because we weren't around back then lol. And that's about the only fact we can ever truly say about the past, whether it be 2,000 years ago, or 200 million years ago. We couldn't have evolved too well though... I mean, apart from the real world being really screwed up, just look at this KZread comment section bickering lol. Good video though. While we'll never truly know, I'm glad we're intelligent enough to ponder such things.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

There's no evolving wrongly. Are you stating that the theory of evolution is on par with creationism ? Haha. Evolution is constantly happening...o don't get why you've said we weren't around back then...back when ? Go look at the studies, don't just search...evolution false.

Chips have super human strength. Fangs. Speed. Those seem like traits us humans could use today. Especially if we share this common ancestor. We are more like a devolution

If this is true, then why don't we know who species x is? If we have no evidence of species x then we can't say that we descended from them.

@Thebossstage1

7 жыл бұрын

This video is old, the missing link was found back in early 2015 www.forbes.com/sites/paulrodgers/2015/03/05/human-missing-link-fossil-found/#135c9efb43e7

@welfarewilliam9785

7 жыл бұрын

We do have species x figured.

None of this made any sense to me and I even wanted to understand I'm very sad

@DrAdityaReddy

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@Limbiclesion

3 жыл бұрын

I guess you would have at least have to have studied some related science to be able think discerningly about the content. if you really want to understand just one link or subject which is irrefutable evidence of our physical evolution from earlier primates then the subject would be the ‘endogenous ancestors Retroviral DNA’ . Or for more in the way of fun read the novel Darwin’s Radio....🙏🧘‍♂️

Prepare for closed minded creationist or religionists spamming the comment section.

@Shangori

9 жыл бұрын

More worried about the poe trolls tbh. Creationists normally don't come on videos that make sense. It's a danger to their religious beliefs

@Xenro66

9 жыл бұрын

Shangori Loool

@shroomyesc

9 жыл бұрын

And also alien theorists

@mredd888

9 жыл бұрын

Evolution is wrong we came from the illuminati wizard lords

@mrman4949

5 жыл бұрын

Whenever Im faced with a religious despute, I just say "Praise Allah" to which it just fizzles out the argument.

What's next to us

this can be summed in three letters such as the letters E, L and the letter I.

So we evolved from a banana first? LMAO!

@BiggestOfDaddies

4 жыл бұрын

What?

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

We evolved in a commen single celled eukaryot. It could not produce photosyntheses, since it devolped later in the plant liniage. You lack the basic understanding of how evolution works.

@K-lINE-76

3 жыл бұрын

@@hailgiratinathetruegod7564 lol how do you know that? Your just thinking that way,, there is no evolution, just adaptive 👍😀

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

@@K-lINE-76 evolution, is literally just adaption.....

Hahaha now where did species x come from 😆😆

@M0NK3YST1CK

4 жыл бұрын

It diverged from its own common ancestor, all the way back to single-celled life that began on Earth at least 3.77 billion years ago.

@numbredheart

3 жыл бұрын

User456 no sir, we have not been on the planet that long

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

From an diffrent anector in the humsn-chimpanze liniage. We found quite a few species there

And now we are evolving back

@sampanzee5684

3 жыл бұрын

I don't think that's how it works.

@percaholic6939

3 жыл бұрын

what

How does branching happen?

@IceBlueBeard

8 жыл бұрын

+Joe Burns The same way you branched away from your mother. You are not identical to her are you? Well just multiply that by 7 millions years of branching away.

@chewchewtrain

7 жыл бұрын

Joe Burns It's like a really big family tree.

You people get so upset when anyone belives in creationism when there a just as many holes in the THEORY of evolution.

@chivo121

4 жыл бұрын

@@ThiagoBv uh oh, looks like I triggered a delicate millennial with a different opinion.

@ThiagoBv

4 жыл бұрын

@@chivo121 Not a millenial + you're just wrong.

@chivo121

4 жыл бұрын

Haha. It's a theory bud. Which means it's not proven. Which means no one knows whos right. Like I said before, you people get so upset about different opinions/beliefs.

@chivo121

4 жыл бұрын

@@ThiagoBvgood for you for googling the definition but you're too narrow minded to understand the broad picture apparently. Your theory can be disproved at any time because It's based on what we know at this point. You shouldn't be so fearful of different opinions. It's ok

@jonnyweber3311

4 жыл бұрын

@@ThiagoBv lmao...

I don’t think your addressing the poorly worded question.The objection to evolution should be how does evolution keep some fish populations unchanged for 100’s of millions of years and simultaneously explain fish becoming people? If nature preserves the creatures best adapted to the environment, wouldn’t it severely limit the 1000’s upon 1000’s of changes required for fish to become people? It seems overwhelming obvious that the transition between a fish and land animal would require vast numbers of generations of creatures less fit to survive in water or land. Meaning for it to adapt to land, it would have to become less fit for the water and since evolution theory demands vast amounts of time it would have to slowly become best fit for the land. The number of changes, the causes of the changes, the benefits of the change that preserved it, the lack of explanation of the complex interdependency of organs and systems within lifeforms and entire ecosystems coming about by undirected or random chance chemical processes, are just a few reasons to doubt the validity of the theory. The most common reaction and response to my objections isn’t to address or refute them. Commonly it causes an emotional response that is followed up with an attack on my intelligence and motivation.Occasionally, mentally stable people will present some information that sometimes touches on my criticism, but hardly is the kind of detailed and scrutinized work that satisfies the constantly repeated mantra of mountains of evidence and questioning it makes me a science denier. My personal favorite defense of evolution is when someone responds by revealing their emotional instability and irrational beliefs about God , religion and bizarre accusations of my beliefs in Magic then followed by the ultimate proof of evolution, “ Your a moron”! I know it’s hard to refute such a powerful argument that employs logic and science, but I’m stubborn I guess. Please don’t think anything I have stated applies to you that I am aware of.I just like to present exactly where I am coming from when asking questions, to avoid any confusion or misunderstandings.Have you seen any detailed scientific work that details and puts some tangible numbers to the transitional stories we all are told? Clearly those vague just so stories don’t meet the criteria and qualify as serious science. At least I doubt they are taken seriously without attempting to put numbers on the changes, causes, environmental adaptations, survival benefits, etc. The closest thing I was shown was the theory of genetic clocks to see if their theories of age and the geologic column would allow for the changes to occur.There are too many assumptions to explain how accurate this science is but if there assumptions are correct it at least puts some parameters around the evolution stories but offers up no explanation of how or why anything in the story happened or actually could happen. I don’t doubt the intelligence and hard work that people have dedicated to the theory.I do think it is very important to make clear distinctions between ideas and facts. I also think that unlike most other sciences the evidence and explanations of the evidence are severely exaggerated and grossly fail to support the claims drawn from them.There is no other scientific theory Or discipline I could point to that has repeatedly embraced fabricated, fraudulent, and purposely and ignorantly misrepresented evidence to support a theory. No other science has used the court systems to require it be taught in the education system and no other science that the public funds is not accepted by more than half the people funding it. In academic institutions there is multiple examples of punishment of anyone who publicly expresses doubt in the theory. Do you have any reason to doubt evolution? Is it ignorant or unscientific to point out any inconsistencies or failures of evolution to properly explain data or is any doubt of evolution based on ignorance? Is it wrong to address the implications the theory has on morality, purpose and objective meaning to our life before teaching it to our youth? To give such a vague and simplistic answer that avoids the question more than it addresses the question is a constant method used to defend evolution. Shouldn’t we expect and demand more from science and ourselves? Just something for you to consider.

@skindred1888

2 жыл бұрын

For the courts, that exists because religions are scared of losing out of income from their church. That's why. Publish your work, you'll win a Nobel prize

Is this what is referred to as the missing link?

I think just adding a bit about science. Especially for this video. Explain that science is about observing the world and writing and talking about it. As silly as that seems that will change a lot of minds

In the first part of your video you easily and clearly explained ADAPTATION not EVOLUTION. You know... just Saiyan. Anyway forget about monkeys and apes for a second what i find more baffling is creatures that have been here for like a gazillion years and are still dumb as shit. Take crocodiles for an example, they've been around for ever and they are still dumb as shit, as are most animals. Why are humans so far advanced in intelligence when it is absolutely not needed at all for survival as can be seen by, i dunno say; EVERY OTHER CREATURE ON THIS DAMN PLANET. I mean you even see it today, even people we consider dumb as shit have no problem breeding and spreading their genes. So whats with the intelligence? what real use is it? in fact; its more of a hindrance when you really think about it.

@IronSquid501

9 жыл бұрын

Evolution IS adaptation. Adaptation over a very, very long time through genetic mutation. Just Saiyan. Also, the reason Crocodiles aren't as smart as Humans is because they don't need to use intelligence to hunt - They have huge honkin' jaws and tend to hunt big, meaty, slow animals that drink plenty of water, like Buffalo, or fast but very dumb animals that breed quickly, like Fish. On the other hand, Humans have fists and teeth that break relatively easily and don't grow back. We have plenty of endurance, but we're not fast, so we can't rely on our speed to get away from, say, a Lion. And since we're not particularly fast, big, or meaty, despite living in numbers, those numbers won't count for much like they do for Zebras or Buffalo, especially since one human had around half a dozen children on average in their lifetime which really isn't much at all when considering infant mortality. So, we need to use our brains. Make weapons, throw rocks, disguise ourselves, or figure out other new and improved ways to survive. Other animals don't need this because they have their own ways of surviving - Be it size, speed, numbers or strength.

@KoyalAlkor

9 жыл бұрын

GIven enough genetic drift the two (or more) groups of the same species will not be genetically similar enough to be the categorized under the same species, which usually, but not always, generate quite noticeable differences between the two new species given the different adaptations they went through. I don't get how intelligence would be a hindrance, unless you mean an animal is wasting energy on a complex brain but has absolutely no opportunity to use its improved cerebral functions to its advantage. Which would be a quite hard scenario to even imagine, because if the animal can't get sufficient advantage from a more complex brain, said complex brain will never become a trait of the species. Chimps are quite intelligent, so are dolphins, they both use their intelligence to better survive. Chimps use rudimentary tools, dolphins cooperate to catch fish better in group (which requires their advanced communication skills), they even cooperate with fisherman on some places. As to your question: *Why are humans so far advanced in intelligence when it is absolutely not needed at all for survival as can be seen by, i dunno say; EVERY OTHER CREATURE ON THIS DAMN PLANET.* *what real use is it? in fact; its more of a hindrance when you really think about it.* We could just as easily point out to other any rare/extreme characteristic from thousands of animals and ask why only species X has Y: Giraffes and long necks, aren't they quite a hindrance? Blue whales and huge body size, way too much food requirement no? Male peacocks and their feathers, pretty much a "eat me" sign for predators! Bombardier beetles and their explosive discharge, why the hell does an animal explode for? No other animals has any of these traits or have them to such a extreme, but still it does not mean they are useles much less a hindrance.

@MyChevySonic

9 жыл бұрын

Are humans smart as shit? I don't see mass genocide for stupid reasons in other animals.

@zub7

9 жыл бұрын

Koyal Alkor "I don't get how intelligence would be a hindrance..." - Yes one point is the massive fuel consumption of our brains some ~20% of our total energy usage. But it goes deeper. Stuff like people having existential crisis', people committing suicides (which is not prevalent in any other species), people literally "thinking themselves too much" to death. "What's the point of living on? life is pointless, no meaning, etc" Your thoughts start overriding your natural instincts on stuff like survival and pro-creation, you see this all around the world with humans. "Chimps are quite intelligent, so are dolphins..." - Please just stop there. They are in no way even close to the level of human intelligence. Maybe in the realm of the animal kingdom but please do not attempt to compare their "intelligence" to human intelligence. They are leagues apart. "We could just as easily point out to other any rare/extreme characteristic from thousands of animals and ask why only species X has Y:...." - The biggest problem with this example is the fact that there have been countless examples before (and probably to come) of animals that have almost identical traits to the ones you listed. There have been many many animals throughout history with long necks, there have been countless animals as large as the Blue whale throughout history (i know the blue is the largest, but shut up! whatever), there have been countless creatures with plumage or fancy displays to attract mates throughout history, etc. Can you say the same for Human intelligence? No. No you can not. There is only one example and it is us.

@zub7

9 жыл бұрын

pulpbits Yes, genocide is a stupid ACT does not mean the whole human race should be judged on this. This stupid act does not nullify the invention of electricity, the auto mobile, mans landing on the moon, etc.

I don't like theories I like 100% concrete undeniable cold hard facts and as of 2016 we don't have any whatsoever

@rainbowspork

7 жыл бұрын

Go BigBLUEforLIFE gravity is a theory

@chewchewtrain

7 жыл бұрын

Go BigBLUEforLIFE No explanation for how we came to be is 100% proven.

@coralline9767

5 жыл бұрын

yeah, but how did the world start? two particles, big bang sure whatever? but where did they come from? sounds like a missing 5% to me. so I agree with you.

Common ancestor. I do not understand why people refuse to grasp that concept. A large herd our common ancestor split apart to two different geographic locations and mated within their group. One evolved into apes and the other into humans.

@kikook222

9 жыл бұрын

BTW, I do believe in God. You cannot argue facts people. Evolution is real.

@Toimi

9 жыл бұрын

Bumbleness Supreme Brady finally a religios person who is not a complete dingus.

@OurayTheOwl

9 жыл бұрын

Wilhelm Sandström Finally a non-religious person who doesn't stereotype...oh wait. You ever stop and think that maybe science and religion aren't mutually exclusive?

@johnathandoe6892

9 жыл бұрын

Wilhelm Sandström Actually most are pretty normal. The abnormal just are more vocal.

@Toimi

9 жыл бұрын

John Doe actually, maybe.

Species X is known as Australopithecus a prehistoric ape that lived from 12 to 10 to 1 million years ago.

so, im one of those "religious nuts" "people who cannot look at facts and understand" "closed minded person" and when i looked at this video i did not see any evidence that supports interspecies evolution. he clearly (and very well i might add) gives support for intraspecies evolution, little genetic anomalies, that allow for a slight genetic change to allow a species to adapt to its new environment but his only explanation about interspecies evolution is "we have a common ancestor" which evolved into all the different primates, but if we take this into account then reason stands to say that "understanding people" need to put all primates on the same level of worth and therefore human life is not to be valued over any other primate. this is something i can never do.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

Why is human life "more valuable" than any other?

@mredd888

9 жыл бұрын

fez sorry I wasn't referring that to you I was saying it to the creator of this thread.

@fieldmarshalhassovondermol851

9 жыл бұрын

When did he say anything about the "value" of life? He isn't dictating morals, just explaining a simple concept.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

mredd888 I'm sorry. I deleted my comment. I do apologize. I honestly thought you were referring to me. I can't stop laughing.

@tylercommons6479

9 жыл бұрын

fez i suppose scientifically speaking it's not, but i choose to believe that it is. PS thanks for the intelligent question.

Not science, just a theory. What is the common ancestor of species x? Where is species x fossil? Why do we have Dino the dinosaur fossils, but no species x? I asked questions like this in high school and was thrown out of class. All I asked for was scientific proof or evidence. This is science, right?

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

6 жыл бұрын

The phrase "just a theory" is an oxymoron in the scientific world. Evolutionary theory is supported by several giant mountains of evidence. The transitional fossils you ask for exist, and are growing every day. We haven't found every single transitional fossil, but the fact that some fossils haven't been found (when thousands of others have) is not grounds for dismissing evolution. You'd have to demonstrate an actual flaw in the theory for that to happen, and the lack of SOME fossils is not a flaw. Thus far, every single fossil that has been discovered has confirmed evolutionary theory. Every study of DNA and other related concepts has confirmed evolution. My guess is that you got thrown out of class - not for asking these question - but for rejecting an explanation similar to the one above. I'd guess that you believe in God and creation, so I'd say your requirements for evidence in support of an idea are at best - embarrassingly inconsistent if you do indeed believe in God and creation - for which there is absolutely zero evidence. Evolution literally has infinitely more evidence than that. Believe what you want, you have that right, but you don't get to assert that there is no evidence for evolution without appearing to be an utter moron.

@coralline9767

5 жыл бұрын

there are flaws in science that religion has explained beginning to end for me. not denying all science. just evolution and the big bang. science is meant to prove how nothing came from something and that 0 + 0 can not possibly = 1. yet it hasn't been done. your explanation is that two particles circles for millions of years to form a hot gas to go on to that circling again for another few million years then more.... but where did the particles come from? every time I ask that question I am told space. but how was space created?. to me that's hypocrisy in science. why can't god just come from nothing but the particles can? @@willoughbykrenzteinburg

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

@@coralline9767 These are not flaws in science; they are your ignorance of the theories which you reject. Your religious ideas merely replace YOUR rejection of the science. You have a flawed understanding of that science. The Big Bang theory DOES NOT make the claim that something came from nothing. The Big Bang Theory initiates with all matter which currently exists existing at a central location and then rapidly expanding. All matter that currently exists existed from the beginning of the Big Bang. The Big Bang is not a theory which describes the absolute beginning of the universe; just as far back as science can CURRENTLY verify. What happened before the Big Bang is a scientific mystery at this point. This does not mean that it will never be known. Science also does not make any claims that something had to come from nothing. This is a baseless jump made by people like you in order to insert God where science has yet to produce an explanation. In other words, the notion that something came from nothing is a religious idea made by religious people and erroneously attributed to science. It's a strawman argument. Science does not say that something came from nothing. For all we know, space and all matter has always existed. Something didn't have to come from nothing, but something did have to initiate the Big Bang, and we don't know what that is. Why can't you accept the Big Bang and Evolution and merely claim that this is HOW God created the universe and all living things? You can have both. You will have many scientists argue that there is no evidence for God being involved (and they would be correct), but at least you wouldn't be rejecting demonstrable scientific fact. I mean, do you even know WHY the Big Bang Theory is universally accepted? Do you know what observations led scientists to the Big Bang Theory to begin with? My guess is that you do not know; you just - for some reason - think that accepting the Big Bang Theory and Evolution is a rejection of God and Creation, so you reject these ideas on the SOLE basis that if they are true, God can't exist, and you will not let go of the existence of God, so you will reject any science which you believe contradicts your God (even though it doesn't). That's not rational. It's not reasonable. One last thing is that the arguments you use can be used against God as well. It is a never ending loop of "what came before". If matter needed to come from somewhere, and if space needed to come from somewhere, then so did God. What created space? Well, if the only explanation is that God created space, then what created God? I'm sure your baseless answer would be "nothing". Well - then you have created a scenario you have already demonstrated you are unwilling to accept. Something cannot come from nothing, so something must necessarily have to create God. Something can't come from nothing, right? YOU are the hypocrite here; not science. Science does not even make the claim on which you base your accusations of hypocrisy. You just assert that science does, and then you characterize it as hypocrisy, and THEN you create the same problem with God. Maybe you would argue that God is eternal and has simply always existed. If that is a concept you are willing to accept, then you have no reason to reject the idea that space and matter have simply always existed just the same. Rejecting the BBT and Evolutionary theory is not evidence that science is flawed. It is evidence that your understanding of that science is flawed. Nothing more.

@coralline9767

5 жыл бұрын

@@willoughbykrenzteinburg you ignored my point. diversion. another thing scientists do when they don't know the answer. makes you ignorant yourself and hypocritical. and i do believe in science. i just believe god created science. so i'm not replacing it with religion when my religion is about science and knew about tons of things (like eye surgery and heart contractions) over 1400 years ago. (this has been proven).

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

5 жыл бұрын

@@coralline9767 I ignored none of your points. This is more of you just fabricating bullshit and attributing it to me. This is how you treat all of science. What specific point did you make that I ignored? Come on, now. And I acknowledged that there are things science does not know. This is the giant difference between people like you and people like me. Science has no problem at all saying "I don't know". Religious people are unable to do this. Any time some answer is unknown, God is inserted as an answer. God used to be the answer for a lot more things than today, but as science has developed verifiable explanations for ideas, God becomes an ever receding concept. This is the fault of YOU people; not science. A few hundred years from now, you will no longer be able to insert God for what happened before the Big Bang because of how you just insert God in place in areas where science has yet to cover - - - but probably eventually will. If you believe God created science, then you should accept the Big Bang Theory and Evolution, and merely claim this was God's doing. When we discover more and more about how the universe works, I don't understand why people like you can't be equally awed by it. Instead of blindly rejecting concepts which have substantial mountains of observational data to support them, why not just say, "Oh...THAT'S how God did it"? Again, you'd find objection to that from some people, but you wouldn't be ridiculed for rejecting demonstrable facts.

A long drawn out way of saying that the chimps who remained in the jungle didn’t evolve and the ones that moved into the plains evolved to go to outer space and build nuclear weapons.

If paper came from trees why are there still trees ? Yaaaaaaa boiiii 🔥🔥

Great video, very clear. I hope some religious people will finally learn...

@khalidkhatib5621

Жыл бұрын

And can you teach us where did species x come from? How did it become species x? How did that unicellular organism become species x? How did it split into two sexes, and then made evolution of life depend on two organisms who need to mate in order to reproduce rather than actually making it easier for life to continue with basing it on one organism to reproduce independently?

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

​@khalid khatib sure, it came from a species before it. This is like asking where your grand other came from. Lol

@MichaelTCory

9 ай бұрын

Okay here’s my thought on species x. He said they don’t know what species x was or has any evidence it actually existed. So he’s just “believing” that a species x must’ve existed. No different from anyone that “believes” there is a God.

Chimps z , humans y and x is unknown. Therefore it's a claim thet still hasn't been proven.

@hailgiratinathetruegod7564

3 жыл бұрын

X exists, because that is what gentics, and the fossil record of ape evolution shows. With even multible species allready know who could be that exact "species X"

Whether you believe in evolution or not, you should still understand that the theory isn't linear and one species can evolve into several others based on what adaptations they would need to make to survive in different areas with different food and conditions. I don't care what your beliefs are, but at least know what something actually is before you completely disagree on it

I don't understand why they didn't explain this to us in school. Is this a new theory?

@IlyasGamer123YT

3 жыл бұрын

It was always like that

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

Well your parents shouldn't have sent you to a Christian school

Yep, but you are wrong. God done did it - everybody knows it. Ps. Where is Hannah? Head Squeeze without Hannah is like jelly without the wiggly bit.

@BBCEarthScience

9 жыл бұрын

More Hannah Fry over the next few weeks, good things come to those who wait...

@weeaboocrane5350

9 жыл бұрын

***** Maybe, we honestly couldn't say one way or the either. God never mentions it in the Bible at least.

@opmdevil

9 жыл бұрын

Jonathan Crane Yep, but still...Head quize without Hannah is like The Hobbit without the Bilbo...

@astronomyguy976

8 жыл бұрын

+opmdevil omg Are You dumb in the head?

@jesseechavarria2223

7 жыл бұрын

I'm going to say this nicely, first check your grammar.Second evolution is much more likely than some all powerful being who created everything.

In the beginning God created man and woman simple as that

@Adam-vr9cu

5 жыл бұрын

@Diamond Ice But there are so many testimonies from people of what they have seen and also historians have evidence

@markuchiha7737

5 жыл бұрын

😫

@fastlane005

4 жыл бұрын

...and we have no proof for that but we still accept it because it makes humans seem very superior to other animals.

@Adam-vr9cu

4 жыл бұрын

@@fastlane005 so your saying what archeologist have found about God isn't proof?

@M0NK3YST1CK

4 жыл бұрын

@@Adam-vr9cu There is no archeological evidence of humans arising from Adam and Eve.

So will the apes evolve along side humans?

that diagram doesnt make sense. is it me or is it coincidental that each common ancestor died off producing all these variations of themselves without a trace.. funny how that link just "died off"

why are humans the only "intelligent" creatures who do things, build things and changed the way they live. why for example arent lions smart?

@pablo9234

4 жыл бұрын

because we aren't ? crows, beavers, ants, octopuses, elephants, chimpanzees and even fishes can build things and learn new behaviors. It's just that we can do it better than them. And what does being "inteligent" mean ? Can you mesure inteligence (don't mention the QI test, which was made for students in kindergarden and got used in ways that made its creators regret inventing it)?

@at7860

4 жыл бұрын

@@pablo9234 well, i havent seen a team of chimps building a city where they live, they are still where they started,

@pablo9234

4 жыл бұрын

@@at7860 not cities, but nests, simple or a bit more complex comosed tools, rock piles, etc... and they develop new habits (for exemple 2 chimpanzees at thesaint louis zoo have been seem performing some kind of dance while the other chimps don't do it)

@at7860

4 жыл бұрын

@@pablo9234 yea, but i mean, look at how humans have changed their way of living: according to evolution, we where just like apes, but now we do all sorts of things that they dont.

@pablo9234

4 жыл бұрын

@@at7860 yes and ? they are fish that do things that other fish don't. does that mean that they aren't fish ? and we are still apes (or more acurately, hominids)

They're called African Amer icans

i would like to see the evolution of the bat lol or of the trex and why he has such tinny arms, where is the transition when he had large arms, and how bout all the other species of flying dinosaurs and insects that have no evolutionary transitions, they magically appeared.

@Johnsmith-hp6tw

Жыл бұрын

Creationists have spent 160 years demanding an infinite series of "transitional fossils" without ever realizing thst all life forms are "transitional"

now he needs to do a video on we are half banana.......

ladies and men i declare victory and the defeat of creationist. science : 1 religion : 0

@Ryan-xe8ud

8 жыл бұрын

True!!!

@carlosfletcher5717

5 жыл бұрын

God exist, he made our existence

Evolution is laughable at this point

@obama_man9933

3 жыл бұрын

Why

So the answer to why there are still monkeys even though we supposedly evolved from them is.... We didnt evolve from them, we just shared a common ancestor (which we dont know the name of). Correct me if im wrong. But this kind of weakens the evolutionary argument to me. Not that Im a creationist but yea its a bit more of a grey area then we evolved from monkeys.

Evolution is real, but our origin is still a theory.

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

6 жыл бұрын

The problem here is you not understanding at all what a "theory" is in science.

@torgie3715

6 жыл бұрын

Maybe, but how do you know if my understanding is complete or not? You have no information at all to go off of yet you ran with your own assumptions and treated them as fact. Don't jump the gun. That is the problem that i am trying to address.

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

6 жыл бұрын

Trever Torgerson The very fact that you implied that a theory is less than in itself is testament to the fact that you don't know what "theory" means in science. Not maybe. I wasn't assuming anything. A theory in science is the absolute top of the ladder. All the information I need to deduce that you dont understand what a theory is - is in your comment claiming that our origin is 'only' or 'just' or 'still' theory. I made no claims outside of that. It's "still" theory because it has a mountain of evidence to support it and no repeatable demonstrations that contradict it. It is the pinnacle of scientific fact. That's what "theory" is.

@torgie3715

6 жыл бұрын

Willoughby Krenzteinburg "species x" is pretty weak to be considered a good theory. The commentator was really vague while explaining that last bit. We don't know a lot about our origins, which means when we learn more the theory can change. New information has changed theories in the past many times. I'm not against it, I just don't like how people have become so loyal to so many ideas that they attack anyone who is even slightly reserved, or worse, they won't accept new facts as they come in.

@willoughbykrenzteinburg

6 жыл бұрын

Trever Torgerson Once again, you're just displaying your ignorance on what "theory" is in science. There's no such thing as good or bad theory. All theories are well established. Otherwise, they wouldn't be considered theories in the first place. Replace the word "theory" with "scientific fact". We know "species x" exists in the same way we knew black holes existed before we found one or the same way we know that you have a great great great (50 times over) grandfather whose identity you are completely ignorant of. Saying that it's "just a theory" is no different from saying that your great great (50 times over) grandfather is just a theory simply because you've never seen his bones. Give me one example of science ignoring "new facts". I'm not arguing this with someone who very clearly lacks the most basic reasoning much less the education in the most fundamental basis of evolutionary theory. Sorry. So name this new fact that everyone is ignoring in your next comment or I'm moving on.

If the Internet puts the totality of human knowledge at your fingertips, then why are there still idiots who believe in Gods?

@kaiserwilhelmii6440

8 жыл бұрын

Cuz idiots

@hoodlum7210

7 жыл бұрын

you can think we are idiots but keep it to yourself. I dont agree with atheist but i stil respect them

@danq256

5 жыл бұрын

@@andreaowens4959 You sort of seem like an idiot with grammar like that, no offense

@markuchiha7737

5 жыл бұрын

@@danq256 😂✌️

lies

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

OK. Now I see that you're obviously a troll. It's called reading. Instead of using your time to make yourself look ignorant here on KZread, try reading a book.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

The Bass I'm detecting a butt-hurt troll people. lol

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

The Bass I'm not disagreeing with everybody. I'm trying to open peoples eyes to science. If there is something wrong with that, please let me know what it is and I will make adjustments accordingly.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

The Bass I know that you are a troll. But I also know more than that. If that is the extent of your knowledge, then you truly are the worlds biggest idiot and the standard by which stupidity is measured. And just like evolution has evidence, your last comment is the evidence for my stated hypothesis.

@infinity1323

9 жыл бұрын

The Bass You meant to say " Don't hand it to your English teacher because your grammar is garbage." If your going to mock my grammar, at least get yours right. Now onto cementing your stupidity - Thanks for thinking that I'm a genius. I'm truly touched and humbled. lol. With every word you type, you cement your position as the worlds most stupid person with nothing at all to contribute. Please keep your comments coming as I am having a jolly good time with you, the person, according to you, at the opposite end of the genius scale. Keep 'em coming boy. Just another thought, I'm so under your skin, or maybe your a new fan of mine, but you searched my KZread history. lol. Get a life and try reading a book. You may want to start easy. I'm suggesting "The Hungry Caterpillar." I read it when I was about 5 years old, so it should be perfect for you now. If you need help with the big words, you know where to reach me. I'll get my 5 year old, MINECRAFT WATCHING, son to respond with your tutelage, seeing as your minds are on the same wavelength. Maybe he's a little more intelligent. We'll see from your next instalment of stupidity.

The real question is why chimpanzee look very much similar to species x while sapiens looks completely different in the same time lapse ??

Apes and Monkeys are different. For a factional channel, you should get these terms correct.

@kijul468

4 жыл бұрын

That is not fact. Apes are a subset of monkeys. Catarrhini consists of: Cercopithecoidea (Old World Monkeys) Hominoidea (Apes) Platyrrhini consists entirely of New World Monkeys. Catarrhini and Platyrrhini are both sister parvorders in the infraorder Simiiformes. As you can see, apes and old world monkets are both in catarrhini, and all new world monkeys are in platyrrhini. This means apes share a more recent common ancestor with old world monkeys than old world monkeys do with new world monkeys. Also, you can see that there are monkeys in both the parvorders, which means the common ancestor to both, which is also the ancestor of apes, must be a monkey itself or you wouldn't get monkeys in each separate group. You may also know that we will always be what our ancestor were. Since our ancestor was a monkey, at what point in the lineage from simiiformes to catarrhines to hominoidea did our ancestors stop being monkeys? They didn't stop being monkeys as the lineage split off into apes and old world monkeys because the old world monkeys kept being monkeys. The fact is that apes are a subset of monkeys.