Use code ARMCHAIRHISTORIAN14 for up to 14 FREE MEALS across your first 5 HelloFresh boxes plus free shipping at bit.ly/3iPKIhg Some tanks, such as the T-26, were not included in this video due to budgetary constraints. We can make a follow-up video including some tanks we missed, as well as tank destroyers and self-propelled guns if you guys are interested! :)

@outsider357

2 жыл бұрын

FREE FOOOOOOD

@awc6007

2 жыл бұрын

Love ur work

@orangesplatproductions

2 жыл бұрын

Cool

@spicyleaves8876

2 жыл бұрын

Yes daddy

@user-wv9kf2nb2x

2 жыл бұрын

Okay but do they have tanks tho?

"American tractors have guns" Damn right they do

@cristianfuentes2597

2 жыл бұрын

NRA version

@lamardavisakald4438

2 жыл бұрын

*murica*

@sparkyjolt6238

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yes-ct1md thats how we do it

@Mwraf

2 жыл бұрын

You Goddamm Right

@unitedstatesofamerica5876

2 жыл бұрын

I can confirm this along with 300 million people

"and preventing our animators launching revolution" Lmao

@klaushauschen

2 жыл бұрын

What part was it said?

@arid1233

2 жыл бұрын

@@klaushauschen 2:58

@arid1233

2 жыл бұрын

He should’ve said that more dramatically

@klaushauschen

2 жыл бұрын

@@arid1233 thanks

@warorchestras5027

2 жыл бұрын

IM LMFAO

I am from Russia, the T-28 was never considered a heavy tank, in the Soviet classification it was always a medium tank because it weighs only 25 tons

@user-mv6pk2gn3m

2 жыл бұрын

Т-35 считался тяжёлым танком.

@JSmithIX

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mv6pk2gn3m Т 28 это средний танк а Т 35 это тяжёлый танк. Танки разные у т 28 3 башни а т 35 имел 5

@user-mv6pk2gn3m

2 жыл бұрын

@@JSmithIX а я что сказал?

@user-su2fq8dh5o

2 жыл бұрын

Жаль не услышали про ИСа 7. Прототип, но все же. Наш самый любимый танк.

@FraYzFrayz

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, Because T-34-85 Weight 32,2 tons and be Medium Tank

I'm surprised you treated the lack of a loader in the T-14 as notable given the fact that every single Russian tank from the T-72 onwards has used an autoloader.

@marianosapper5919

2 жыл бұрын

I think he means that in the t14 there is not crew members in the turret, they are in the hull

@Goran1138

2 жыл бұрын

Autoloader was introduced in T-64.

@ShashiKumar-vp1xz

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-gz9xz9tr6k i think you are wrong

@overzone666

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-gz9xz9tr6k Я производю систему заряжания Т-14

@ShashiKumar-vp1xz

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-gz9xz9tr6k its okay

"we will not be covering self propelled guns " sad su152 noises.

@NotKameron

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah sad

@mikisavic6765

2 жыл бұрын

Sad su 80 su76 su 100 su152 isu152 sad noises

@TR33ZY_CRTM

2 жыл бұрын

*Sad ZSU-57-2 noises*

@commandergeokam2868

2 жыл бұрын

@@TR33ZY_CRTM but this was an anti aircraft artillery

@partisan212

2 жыл бұрын

@@TR33ZY_CRTM Sad Br-18 305mm howitzer noises

“The tank was X fast on road and X fast offroad.” Rural Russians: “Road… Offroad… What’s difference?”

@Grubnar

2 жыл бұрын

When it rains, road is slower than offroad!

@user-fi2vc7ei8v

2 жыл бұрын

Because there is no road in Rural Russia

@alicorn3924

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-fi2vc7ei8v rasputitsa go brrrrr

@max_me_is

2 жыл бұрын

Offroad is where the trees grow

@amekoriginal

2 жыл бұрын

@@alicorn3924 хахахахах смешно видеть это слово в употреблении иностранцев))

I am in absolute disbelief that the Tsar Tank was not covered in this video, truly the tank of all time.

@redacted5937

Жыл бұрын

It was truely one tank of all time.

@Pibola64

Жыл бұрын

well, they did say at 2:57 for the sake of their animators, they wouldn't list every tank russia made, but the Tsar Tank really should've been at least mentioned in the video

"The Russian death fridge!" Well at least they're putting them to good use, they surely aren't using them for food

@raketny_hvost

2 жыл бұрын

It's actually inaccurate as KV-2 with part of luck could prepare nice german shashlik in metal cover

Really feel like the T 26 should’ve been in here considering how many of them were made and how important it was to early Soviet war doctrine

@alexs_toy_barn

2 жыл бұрын

it wouldnt have sounded much different from the BT-series tank description, they were so similar. tho a quick mention would have been nice

@ekparatrooperfilms9668

2 жыл бұрын

And the TSAR tank as well

@grimmer54

2 жыл бұрын

@@ekparatrooperfilms9668 that's a armored tricycle not a tank lol

@senatorarmstrong7168

2 жыл бұрын

.

@mdokuch96

2 жыл бұрын

There were also plenty of home designs of 20-s, from "copy" of FT-17 to attempts of creating original in design medium tanks. The video basically failed to show the evolution of Soviet armor - of how it has started and how exactly has come to MBT era. Sure, the channel is not of format, suitable for a 2-hour lecture on the matter, but then why to touch the topic at all...

The most shocking part was that wargaming or warthunder didn’t sponsor this episode

@NicoURU1830

2 жыл бұрын

Showing why he has some massive errors.

@SomeRndomGoose

2 жыл бұрын

@@NicoURU1830 how does he have massive errors

@rasmusdamkjr5270

2 жыл бұрын

Especially since this video is about Russian tanks.

@user-zm8kv8jd4t

2 жыл бұрын

War thunder one love! ))

@toobig7150

2 жыл бұрын

here they come, warthunder elitists.

Annnnnnnnnd, this might need a slight update in 2022… At the very least with regards to the discovery of a new weakness… tractors….

@dannyzero692

2 жыл бұрын

Tanks are no matched against tractors, tractors can stalk a tank in plain sight and with its sheer presence the tank can only froze and accept its fate and be towed by the tractors.

@kartertaylor6080

2 жыл бұрын

Tractors are a staple of armored warfare there the number 1 tank killer

One small thing, the T-14 Armata still has a gunner. Human loaders in Russian tanks were long gone since the introduction of the T-64.

@falstaffm6539

Жыл бұрын

One even smaller detail .. no T-14 tank exists and will not exist for a number of reasons. These are technical problems, the lack of many technologies, low engineering culture, the lowest production culture and the low level of training of Russian tankers, as well as an elementary lack of money. This is sad, but the situation cannot be quickly reversed. Russia is not yet able to create and build a tank of at least the level of the American M1A1. It will not work !!!

@frogboi965

Жыл бұрын

@@falstaffm6539 t90m is able to rival the abrams

@funkbass1986

Жыл бұрын

@@falstaffm6539 t14 is in Ukraine already

@leopard_2A6-906

Жыл бұрын

@@falstaffm6539 the T-14 exists

@leopard_2A6-906

Жыл бұрын

@@frogboi965 atgms can destroy an Abrams 😂

This is such a happy video… Primarily because they have no depression.

@Jadanbr

2 жыл бұрын

WoT memes soviet tanks have low gun depression

@bjmccann1

2 жыл бұрын

😂🤣🤣😂

@Palkia8842

2 жыл бұрын

@Hernando Malinche both

@joao-jn3ck

2 жыл бұрын

@Hernando Malinche wart hunder**

@USSAnimeNCC-

2 жыл бұрын

And don’t retreat there transmission follow Stalin order of not one step back policy for the mother land

"And preventing our animator's worker's revolution of their own." *Seize the means of animation production*

@mirzaramishbaig8980

2 жыл бұрын

I smell revolution

@collinwilliams3064

2 жыл бұрын

I’m upset that you didn’t say “seize the memes of production”

@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777

2 жыл бұрын

Hm Who wants to, START A REVOLUTION?

@DWLin-vq1lr

2 жыл бұрын

@@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777 oversimplified

@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777

2 жыл бұрын

@@DWLin-vq1lr Perhaps, I been waiting for a year to use that one, and "Sounds, güd"

03:00 "and preventing our Animators to launch a Worker's Revolution of their own"

Cool video and animation! I just wanted to clarify a couple of points, the T-64 and T-72 are related tanks that were only made at different factories, the T64 was completely innovative, they wanted to make everything new at once, and because of this there were a lot of problems during manufacture, and the T72 followed the path of gradual modernization and debugging of production because of this, it significantly simplified and reduced the cost of the design, so the T-72A, T-72B, T-72B1, T72M ..... The T-10 is the last heavy tank, and then we thought, Why do we need two different classes of tanks, they are similar in armor, the guns are the same, let's combine medium and heavy tanks, take speed and cross-country ability from medium, and from heavy armor and a gun, so the main battle tank (MBT) was made There was an IT-1 tank (tank destroyer-1) in the 60s, it was armed only with missiles, and after some deliberation, they decided to combine the MBT, which had a rifled weapon with the IT-1, hence the 125 mm smoothbore cannon for firing missiles.

@aperson5443

Жыл бұрын

Thanks to my Russian skills I know your username is Denis Nagornov

@noahfromkakanj

Жыл бұрын

@@aperson5443 wе до нот царе

@aperson5443

Жыл бұрын

@@noahfromkakanj апологис

@300guy

Жыл бұрын

No they really aren't, other than the gun possibly, there is very little that could be swapped from one tank to the other, unlike the T72 and T90 its pimped out descendent.

@Mrgrass-fk3bf

5 ай бұрын

IT-1 Missile Tank Destroyer fires 180mm calibre 3M7 anti-tank corncob, capable of penetrating 1800mm thick homogeneous steel armour placed vertically, each 3M7 anti-tank corncob is handmade by Khrushchev🤓

The thumbnail is G L O R I O U S, your artists do a fantastic job!

@samarthshukla9617

2 жыл бұрын

Cap

@samarthshukla9617

2 жыл бұрын

It's not glorious

@samarthshukla9617

2 жыл бұрын

It is magnificent

@athharumar2081

2 жыл бұрын

Give a raise😎

@OK-qj9lw

2 жыл бұрын

Brings a tear to anyone’s eye

“Behold the Russian death fridge” I was not expecting he say that

@arcqx9676

2 жыл бұрын

But, A fridge is very powerful and in theory, can survive a nuclear blast. A Russian tank is a fridge with a cannon and tracks on it. (And armor I guess) The ATV looks like a fridge with tracks and a machinegun on it..

@The_Republic_of_Ireland

2 жыл бұрын

Equipped with a 152mm Communism launcher

@myreactiontothatinformatio6344

2 жыл бұрын

And only has two types of shell HE and VODKA

@vex_mistaken

2 жыл бұрын

Is that not what it’s called?

@ellis4091

2 жыл бұрын

Ah yes, stalin's personal nuclear launcher

The Russians did not fight the Taliban. The Taliban where founded in the early 90s when the Russians already have left Afghanistan. The Russians fought the Mujahedin.

One of the only people on KZread that uses sources Respect.

Why use steel for armor when you can use stalinium?

@itsyaboiDavid05

2 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@paperball2113

2 жыл бұрын

Stali means steel so I mean

@fujiwara4109

2 жыл бұрын

I know

@NoNo-qj3ef

2 жыл бұрын

Steelnium

@s1mplem4gic58

2 жыл бұрын

How original

“Tanks everyone, now I’m a Major Superpower!”

@joebama6825

2 жыл бұрын

Hey, it’s me, Will Smith from Team Cherry. We have unanimously decided as a board that you are officially getting times that are not intended for casual players. We don’t want people thinking they shouldn’t play our game due to your stupidly insane skills at this game, and as a result we are purposely tweaking your RNG numbers to be unfavourable. Sorry for the inconvenience, it had to be done

@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa1261

2 жыл бұрын

@@joebama6825 what

@joebama6825

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa1261 did i stutter

@Whammy-bb9ek

2 жыл бұрын

@@joebama6825 you did.

@dukekevy6650

2 жыл бұрын

guys the chinese republic is onto me

are the 2 300 T14s with us in the room right now?

@dangername6996

2 жыл бұрын

That's really funny))) The real number is about 25 units

@IM_NOT_A_DISH

2 жыл бұрын

@@dangername6996 4, and then only at military parads (sori for my inglish, it is veri bed)

@dangername6996

2 жыл бұрын

@@IM_NOT_A_DISH At least 22 additional tanks Russian army got by the end of 2021. Info by russian military

The fact that in the beginning talking about the scale of ussr tanks he"so,our animator's don't have a workers revaluation of their own" killed me

In Yugoslavia they use *TITAnium* In Soviet Russia they use *STALINium*

@drunkzilla3522

2 жыл бұрын

Titonium

@RenneDanjoule

2 жыл бұрын

You know what wasnt Russian? The Soviet Union.

@Mrs.THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL

2 жыл бұрын

@@RenneDanjoule I said SOVIET fucking RUSSIA, Not "RUSSIA"

@RenneDanjoule

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mrs.THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL So if I say the "Paris commune" it suddenly has nothing to do with France? Don't make me laugh. It certainly had less to do with the French people than foreigners true, but a multi-national Russian empire must delineate properly to avoid anti-nationalistic outbursts, much like all Imperial cities become housed by rootless cosmopolitans...something Stalin addressed in his chimerical despotic Imperialism, and feeble usage of the revolutionary slogans of liberalism and nationalism.

@Mrs.THECOMMUNISTCHANNEL

2 жыл бұрын

@@RenneDanjoule and the USSR was a UNION of SOVIET REPUBLICS in which the dominant majority was RUSSIAN but that doesn't make it RUSSIAN don't be a smartass

"The IS-2 also had a MG to ward off luftwaffe attackers" It's cute how you assume the luftwaffe was still a threat when the IS-2 was used:P

@akriegguardsman

2 жыл бұрын

Thats why there was only 1 MG and not a 25mm

@icycreamfrommc_1745

2 жыл бұрын

in 1943, the Luftwaffe was still a threat but not superior, as it had lost some planes and soviet air power increased, look at kursk if so

@cdgncgn

2 жыл бұрын

@@icycreamfrommc_1745 Bagration.

@icycreamfrommc_1745

2 жыл бұрын

@@cdgncgn yep

@Gigas0101

2 жыл бұрын

@@cdgncgn Isn't that where Bilbo and Frodo lived?

5:20 WHERE THE HELL IS THE BT5?! YOU MISSED A ENTIRE TANK!

@ploppyjr2373

2 жыл бұрын

An entire*

@jedinight2353

2 жыл бұрын

@@ploppyjr2373 Don't be a Grammer Joe.

@Kalashnikov413

Жыл бұрын

@@jedinight2353 don't be a douchebag who doesn't want other people to corrected you (even though he's right)

@hasan1618

11 ай бұрын

he had to or else the animators would start a workers’ revolution!

@jedinight2353

11 ай бұрын

@@hasan1618 bt5 contributed more though that's the problem.

The T-14 has two variants of guns, as you said, there is a 125-mm, and there is also a 152-mm gun, the minus of which is small ammunition, but more destructive power.

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

That's what it was designed for. This is a kind of sniper among tanks, and a vertical loading carousel was installed there, which allows you to use a projectile that penetrates no worse than DM53 (because the length of the projectile). I don't think it's worth talking about the range, everything is clear enough here. Greetings from an Armenian living in Russia. :3

@user-lz8qo2ie7s

Жыл бұрын

I forgot to say that he has armor in the hull in the area of 1 meter and the trophy system seems to be a system like a cougar that diverts missiles and an irradiation warning system And the joke is that this tank is cheaper than Abrams and lighter, an engine with a capacity of up to 1800 horsepower, a maximum speed of 51 kilometers per hour maximum speed off-road, on the highway 81. :3

You know which tanks weren't affected by "The great depression"? Russian tanks.

@fkjl4717

2 жыл бұрын

positively affected, actually)

@Kalashnikov413

2 жыл бұрын

@@fkjl4717 no, you didn't get the joke

@user-fi2vc7ei8v

2 жыл бұрын

Because they're already depressed

@heat-fs4045

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlphaPhoton COMRADE, WE CANNOT HAVE GUN DEPRESSION IN THE SOVIET UNION! HERE, EVERYONE IS HAPPY! -definitely not Soviet propaganda officer

@raketny_hvost

2 жыл бұрын

@@heat-fs4045 you have doubts that he isn't? *Loads grandpa's mosina *

Gotta love slapping ERA on anything and everything to modernize it!

@namesurname624

2 жыл бұрын

Now APS are getting mounted on T72B3 too. New tanks are too computerised to be produced in large numbers. French processors used to be mounted on Armata, but with sanctions cant buy them. Sad.

@cabin4999

2 жыл бұрын

maybe they can do that on the CF-18!

@f-35enjoyer59

2 жыл бұрын

You see comrade, if whole tank is ERA then it cannot be penned.

@NotKameron

2 жыл бұрын

You get modernized and you get modernized everyone gets modernized

@golucid745

2 жыл бұрын

@YusufFurther explanation: Russian ERA usually consists of an explosive sandwitched between two (or more) steel plates (a prime example being Kontakt 1). When a projectile hits, the explosive is detonated, and the two metal plates are pushed apart. The plate facing the projectile is pushed toward said projectile, creating more resistance against it and making the armor harder to pen. Of course, ERA works better against HEAT warheads such as missiles, which explode on contact with a surface and release a jetstream to pierce the armor. Spaced layers of armor are a good counter to this projectile (hence why panzers had sideskirts), but ERA works better in that the explosive force generates even more empty space for the jetstream to have to go through by pushing the metal plates apart.

as a new watcher I hope to see this for more countries and also a look into tank destroyers Artillery/SPGs and standard rifles and machine guns

ha ha Javelin go kaboom

20:26 “behold, the Russian death fridge.”

@georgyekimov4577

2 жыл бұрын

This tank was a badass there is a story (ni fakt chek so it might not be true) that one of thus tanks held a road for three days with out getting destroyed

@imlivingunderyourbed7845

2 жыл бұрын

The biggest troll Stalin had ever unleashed upon the world.

@combinedingredients2294

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgyekimov4577 the KV-2 sucked majority of the time, and per that story, it held Germans over for a day and was destroyed.

@polarbear6479

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgyekimov4577 I’m pretty sure that was a KV-1. The KV-2 wouldve reloaded too slow and have insufficient ammunition to fight for that long

@user-eg1xp1xv9d

2 жыл бұрын

@@quangminhnguyen2504 ещё был колабанов

22:22 - the IS-3 had a hemispherical turret, not a pike-nosed one. Its frontal glacis is pike-nosed.

@NotKameron

2 жыл бұрын

Nice callout

@CharcharoExplorer

2 жыл бұрын

@@NotKameron It is likely just a mis-speaking error.

@bbcmotd

2 жыл бұрын

They also call BT-2 a B-2 a couple of times

@korana6308

6 ай бұрын

@@bbcmotd There are many wrong facts in this video. Too many to list here.

7:28 the t-34 you showed isnt the 1940, its the 1941 model

7:51 мин- у винтовок Мосина рукоятка затвора была прямая, отогнутая только у снайперских. Мелкая придирка. Все хорошо.

This is where the Stalinium jokes begin :d

@daygus1115

2 жыл бұрын

I hope they don't, it is so over used.

@Nietabs

2 жыл бұрын

@@daygus1115 yep

@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa1261

2 жыл бұрын

there’s one above your comment

@itisisacha2358

2 жыл бұрын

Shut up

@Orvz475

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah. 🤣

Unfortunately none of these were a match for New Zealand's Bob Semple tank

@wetlettuce4768

2 жыл бұрын

There's a reason the Soviet Union never invaded New Zealand.

@haleloop963cortex4

2 жыл бұрын

The Bob semple tank is too powerful

@nolategame6367

2 жыл бұрын

The NI tanks would like to have a word with you

@thegamingweeb7013

2 жыл бұрын

Semple tank only used .5% of its power

@-J--vx7nv

2 жыл бұрын

@@nolategame6367 as well as Vezdekhod

"But also to stop the animators from launching a workers party as well" That got me😂

Wtf they haven’t made 2300 t-14s. They have maybe 19. Edit: Looks like you just pulled your info from Wikipedia. Sad.

@Kalashnikov413

2 жыл бұрын

Wikipedia said that it doesn't even reach 1000 yet It's probably the number of tanks the Ministry of Defence ordered

t-72 one of the most underrated tank in my book, obviously the proper russian models not the cheap export rip offs iraq had

@cristianfuentes2597

2 жыл бұрын

Lion of Babylon u mean

@nikbond188

2 жыл бұрын

From what I understand, the Iraqis received a down graded version of T-72M, which in it self was a downgrade from the main line T-72

@Ross72A

2 жыл бұрын

@@nikbond188 they had some B models but they are rip-offs as well

@mcfragger2605

2 жыл бұрын

@@cristianfuentes2597 worst part was actually the outdated Anti Tank shells that those Iraqi T72s had

@BHuang92

2 жыл бұрын

Considering many of those tanks are still in service and better capabilities then the T-55 series, shows how good the design is.

"The Russian death fridge" love that he said that

@SgtPotShot

2 жыл бұрын

These World of Tanks memes are getting slightly out of control

@JosephStalin-yk2hd

2 жыл бұрын

@@SgtPotShot you mean war thunder memes.

@couchpotatowiththehat

2 жыл бұрын

you mean both. Even though the communities hate each other both can agree that the kv-2 is a death fridge

@JosephStalin-yk2hd

2 жыл бұрын

@@couchpotatowiththehat yeah but still pretty hilarious, comrade...

@FelonM

2 жыл бұрын

@Сергей Владимирович Таборицкий respect what they play comrade, dont insult them because of what they prefer to play

2022: a tiny car where the doors fall off and hundreds of soldiers get out

hello Englishmen, Americans, greetings from Russia

Command: our tanks are becoming outdated Soviet tank designer: I’ll slap another letter on and change 2 things. Command: sold

@MrMediator24

2 жыл бұрын

*Everyone's tank designer

@haleloop963cortex4

2 жыл бұрын

The best part about this was it actually worked

@Tanker000

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrMediator24 not really

@Tales41

2 жыл бұрын

Lol what Soviet tanks didn't become outdated.

@neilwilson5785

2 жыл бұрын

Marmite is my B12 soul animal, without dead animal.

“American tractors have guns” As a fellow American, this is accurate lol

@Partizag

2 жыл бұрын

You know what Red Army use tank "NI-2" and this tractor-tank create in "Crimea" operation Nazi. This is tank use who defended this territory.

@radzieckigraczproductions3

2 жыл бұрын

@@Partizag r/ihadastroke

@martinkubis4470

2 жыл бұрын

@@Partizag Who is a nazi ?

@Partizag

2 жыл бұрын

@@martinkubis4470 I don't know how you get name Germany in period WW2. I listen in film, USA force named in slang Germany this name.

@KillerSpoon575

2 жыл бұрын

@@Partizag look, if you can communicate better in your native language, then by all means go ahead. google translate may not be perfect, but it'll give me a good idea of what you mean.

18:50 Not sure why the T-28 was listed as a Heavy tank, sure it was heavy but it is a medium tank for sure, while the T-35, which several people might call its older brother, is quite assuredly a heavy tank. It seems as though it might be mistaken as though the T-35 is a special type of T-28, but both tanks, despite looking similar, are separate and different designs

Kinda sad you did not mention the IS-7. Only 2 prototypes where built but it was truly a masterpiece of a tank.

@depressedfurry8129

Жыл бұрын

IS-7 produced 7 prototypes and several pre-production models

@ChristopherPuente-db8br

9 ай бұрын

How come the soviet didn't finished them??, was it because of mechanical issues or is it something else??

@_b_x_b_1063

9 ай бұрын

​@@ChristopherPuente-db8brWeight 67 tonn. Mass limir series soviet heavy tank- 50 tonn.

@ChristopherPuente-db8br

9 ай бұрын

@@_b_x_b_1063 oh okay

The info was enjoyable, but the cherry on the cake is the pure art of the animations; really, your animators are absolutely incredible.

Kudos to the artists. They do a grand job making these thumbnails. Whenever you upload, the artwork is a sight to see.

@darnit1944

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, keep giving them praises. Maybe they'll rethink about launching their revolution.

@ushiki2212

2 жыл бұрын

That late T 34 looking fresh.

@joebama6825

2 жыл бұрын

Hey, it’s me, Will Smith from Team Cherry. We have unanimously decided as a board that you are officially getting times that are not intended for casual players. We don’t want people thinking they shouldn’t play our game due to your stupidly insane skills at this game, and as a result we are purposely tweaking your RNG numbers to be unfavourable. Sorry for the inconvenience, it had to be done

THE LAZERPIG LOOP: 1. People Think Russia Mil tech is good cos: -Rugged -Battleharded -quanitiy over qualitylol -T-34 best tank of ww2 -Russian not corrupt like pentagon 2. War Happens, Russia stuff turns out to suck 3. People Forget War 4. Russia Stronk Memes and repeat

As always, an excellent and informative overview! Aloha 😊🤙🏼👏🏼

“And we will not be covering Tank destroyers” Sad su-100Y noises

@denka7265

2 жыл бұрын

+ sad isu-152 noises

@dylanchen

2 жыл бұрын

only one of it is made, and not effective at all, considering it used a naval gun

@jacaredosvudu1638

2 жыл бұрын

Sad twerk

@dulguunjargal1199

Жыл бұрын

Ahh yes, The building with a gun

Haven't even seen the video and I'm already curious what he'll say about the T-34.

@christian_x

2 жыл бұрын

me too

@kittybuilderbunch7906

2 жыл бұрын

Fool we’re all talking about the KV 2

@kamov52510

2 жыл бұрын

I only care about the Is-2

@fkjl4717

2 жыл бұрын

T-34 - useful tank, but nothing special. KV-1 more dangerous.

17:03 inscriptions are mixed up lol If someone interested, crew was became 3 men because of automated reloading system which operated by gunner. Also, like was said, T-14 have fully mechanized turret, which allowed to move all crew members in protected capsule(how russian military say) in tank's body

12:54 Very important to note; the Taliban did not exist in any sort of major capacity during the Soviet-Afghan war. They were fighting the Mujahideen and a handful of other groups but not the Taliban.

A German tank plowing through Soviet defenses: “Ha, this is just too easy!” A Soviet T-34 shows up: “Say hello to my little friend!”

@darnit1944

2 жыл бұрын

And they dont stop coming and they dont stop coming

@sooryan_1018

2 жыл бұрын

KV2 and IS2 - Surprise motherf*ckers!

@PatriotAnimation

2 жыл бұрын

*riochets off the view port*

@sannidhyabalkote9536

2 жыл бұрын

@@PatriotAnimation Spain without the s

Who would win the German army with over 3 million men or 45mm of sloped armour 🤣

@localextremist2839

2 жыл бұрын

German tank shell go ricochet

@chaosXP3RT

2 жыл бұрын

The Soviet Army with 10 million men

@shivanshna7618

2 жыл бұрын

@@chaosXP3RT 11

@taxidermypolarbear1724

2 жыл бұрын

Why are you on every vid I watch iron Just why

@BatCostumeGuy

2 жыл бұрын

@@shivanshna7618 20

10:15 Actually torsion bar suspension system had been used since T-44.

2300 T14 built, funny joke lol

Soon in future, the “Evolution of American Tanks” for sure.

@ayax2134

2 жыл бұрын

From crap to crap xddd im only joking

@S.C1970

2 жыл бұрын

@@ayax2134 yeah..... haha... I guess.

@sirethanthegreat4069

2 жыл бұрын

@@S.C1970 American tanks aren’t crap

@ognjenmatic9430

2 жыл бұрын

You call that an evolution?

@captain_duck0o084

2 жыл бұрын

@@ayax2134 american obviously are better man you don't want to make ww3 here

since we all make mistakes, i would just autocorrect the armor layout of the IS 3 of "pike nose turret" to a "Pike nose Hull". trying to help, have a great day

There is the failed variant of the T-34 that is the T-34-100.

Historical mistake. Christie sold not a tank, but a tank chassis. Christie's tank did not have a turret or armament.

It's great how your voice just intensified when talking about everyone's favorite Death Fridge the KV-2.

KV-2: Hi! All other tanks: *dies instantly*

@shrek6608

2 жыл бұрын

The KV-2 was not used to destroy tanks, it was used to destroy fortifications and bunkers, and almost all of the KV-2s were destroyed.

@hunterbg6651

2 жыл бұрын

@@shrek6608 You ruined the joke now you are going to gulag.

@hallowedbeyourdays

2 жыл бұрын

@@shrek6608 The Wehrmacht did capture more than a few, and rather than put them to anti-position duty they were made into coastal artillery assets. Worked, too.

@11retama

2 жыл бұрын

𝙊𝙣𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙖𝙠𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙠𝙫 2 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙖𝙙 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 ;-;

@11retama

2 жыл бұрын

@@shrek6608 I agree I think I remember that there was a nickname for the KV 2’s called “Stalin’s bunker buster”

6:41 One of the most effective tanks in military history* *Eventually

@Kalashnikov413

2 жыл бұрын

Which part you're referring to?

@coaxill4059

2 жыл бұрын

​@@Kalashnikov413 6:41 "One of the most effective tanks in military history" I should've been more clear, I'll add this to the original comment.

T72-B3 is literally my favorite soviet tank, like literally the design is amazing

How should we demonstrate the tanks? Armchair Historian: Have them running over cars!!!

@blinthepannkek6173

2 жыл бұрын

A moment of silence to the cars that got squeezed flat during the video.

@deev2789

2 жыл бұрын

Well, as the tanks are classed by their weight class as Heavy etc, running over cars would show it well... But why cars tho lol.

@borisslavk01nolastname91

2 жыл бұрын

@@deev2789 Why cars? Well, we can't use people or POWs since the Geneva Convention will come looking for us

@deev2789

2 жыл бұрын

@@borisslavk01nolastname91 True true, but I think we could use the nuremberg convictees.

@borisslavk01nolastname91

2 жыл бұрын

@@deev2789 We could probably use them. Geneva Convention will definitely won't bat an eye. Right?

Germans: We are going to make high quality Panzer 4s that can shoot very far and is very light! Soviets: T 26 ctrl C ctrl V

@mikisavic6765

2 жыл бұрын

T-34 1942:CTRL C CTRL V

@mikeymike9926

2 жыл бұрын

Imagine Hitler playing beat saber, and it’s Soviet tanks, and he’s just going with ones and twos then all the sudden the entire board gets loaded

@colobopsis5685

2 жыл бұрын

Well, T-IV was initially planned as an infantry support vehicle. Here comes it's short barrelled 75 mm gun. The reason it got long barrel was of absence of any other platforms for such gun at that time, as T-III could not stand such torture.

@sarchived

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikeymike9926 t-34s: spam

@ivanchemeris9632

2 жыл бұрын

If i recall corectly, T-26 production stopped by the time the Panzer 4 entered service. If I recall corectly, complete t-26 production stoppen in either 1938 or early 1939

No matter the design, every single tank the Soviet's and Russian's made had the "Special Turret Ejection System" when hit, truly a one of a kind feature.

@ryanweltz4076

2 жыл бұрын

@Not_Ambrose I mean it had the same burn rate as ANY OTHER TANK because you know... They get hit? And was less likely to get it's turret popped off and give the crew a chance to escape And with the ammo moved and with new wet ammo stowage the Sherman was actually one of the tanks less likely to burn when hit... Unlike some designs **ahem** T-34 **ahem** who's turret just makes it's own space program.

@ryanweltz4076

2 жыл бұрын

@Not_Ambrose yep that's why I said they moved it, it had a good chance to be set on fire, but the room inside and well placed escape hatches gave the crew a chance to escape, and yeah the T-34 had fuel in it's fighting compartment so when it gets hit, either the turret is gone or the ammo cooks off, that's why there so many pictures of T-34s with no turret or burnt, and it's cramped space doesn't help.

@lieneage4427

2 жыл бұрын

Thankfully west design MBTs since the 80s prevented such problem

@ryanweltz4076

2 жыл бұрын

@Not_Ambrose No, they were pictures from the allies and from the USSR themselves, and yeah with the tight space I doubt the crew could survive a hit, let alone the driver, cause you see, the T-34 was over heat treated making the armor quite sturdy but EXTREMELY brittle, that's why even the 37mm AT guns, so called the "Door Knocker" because on paper the T-34, was able to withstand the hit... Which didn't happen in early designs, the moment the tank got hit, the armor shatters both outside and inside, flinging extremely hot and sharp metal debris at very fast speeds ricocheting inside the tank turning it into a human blender, also the fuel inside the fighting compartment either burns or explode, and guess what happens? The crew dies. Also, many tanks had a driver's hatch, the Shermans? Yep, the panzers? Yep(some panzer models didn't but still, most models had one) British tanks? Yep, how the hell would the driver get in without a hatch?

@ryanweltz4076

2 жыл бұрын

@Not_Ambrose if you still don't believe me with the crew survivability thing, the T-34 suffered thousands of crew deaths reaching up to 300,000 compared to the Sherman's 1,500 (half outside the tank) and people still call the Sherman a deathtrap even though the T-34 who they praised to be rugged, cheap(even though it costed as much as the Sherman), "reliable" (the T-34 had the biggest fail rate during the war, constant breakdowns, cheaply manufactured ect) Was one of the most deadly tanks to be in (80% crew survivability).

A little boy was walking in the field. He found a pineapple, and this is a German land mine. He tried a piece, and the hand was found six kilometers away.

This feels like a subtle No Step Back DLC ad.

@freiervogel3440

2 жыл бұрын

"Subtle"

@bilalyusuf6144

2 жыл бұрын

DO NOT BECOME THE NEXT 'avery cuban american' or 'some guy without mustache' WHY DO I KEEP SEEING YOU GUYS EVERYWHERE?

@OtterTreySSArmy

2 жыл бұрын

@@thelithuanian1774 you know who else needs a new focus tree? The Americans. My God their focus tree is tiny and depressing. Germany's vanilla one is pretty pathetic too but it's much better than the vanilla US one

@republic0_032

2 жыл бұрын

@@OtterTreySSArmy still better than italys

@OtterTreySSArmy

2 жыл бұрын

@@republic0_032 lmao I don't think I've seen the vanilla Italy tech tree in a long time but I can imagine based on real historical performance, it's pretty lackluster

"Dimitri, ride on one of the tanks. You have earned the rest. Chernov! You have not. You walk."

@hib7295

2 жыл бұрын

nice WaW reference there

@Psychol-Snooper

2 жыл бұрын

@@hib7295 I wanted to quote from one of the tank driving missions, but couldn't remember what the glorious intro speech was... not one word.

@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777

2 жыл бұрын

@@Psychol-Snooper it was a badass mission though

@Psychol-Snooper

2 жыл бұрын

@@Dianasaurthemelonlord7777 Now all they do are online services.

Dude, incredible video. Awesome production and content! Thank you!

в т14 показали что там 3 члена экипажа показали так как будто в предыдущих танках было 4 члена экипажа после того как начали использовать автомат заряжания, их стало 3

"And preventing our animators worker's revolution of their own." *Lenin wakes up from its grave*

@ShadeAKAhayate

2 жыл бұрын

It's ~50 years early for him. His force succeeded not because the good always wins, but because they saw an opportunity when tsarist oppression was already gone and newborn fascism of Kerensky was still feeble enough. And of course, without simple people being pushed well over the edge by these two menaces, bolsheviks would not be able to do anything at all.

@miakodakot7359

2 жыл бұрын

He have no grave. He have mavsolei

@ShadeAKAhayate

2 жыл бұрын

@@miakodakot7359 Mauseleum is still a grave.

@miakodakot7359

2 жыл бұрын

@@ShadeAKAhayate Ah yes, mausoleum, I forgot how it calls. Thanks

@RenneDanjoule

2 жыл бұрын

No, stay in your grave like your older brother after he tried to assassinate the Tsar.

as a child in afghanistan in my earlier years, i was able to climb around old knocked out t62s and t55s

@borisslavk01nolastname91

2 жыл бұрын

Were there ammunition or weapons inside those tanks? I always wonder what happens to the tank ammo and the self defense weapons for the tank crew when the tank gets destroyed

@ShadeAKAhayate

2 жыл бұрын

@@borisslavk01nolastname91 That depends. If it's just knocked out and can't be towed back, the crew should attempt to demolish the thing, but if unsuccessful -- it may be pretty intact. If that was a catastrophic destruction, however, there would remain no ammuntion or weapons inside (maybe like some misshapen pieces of metal).

@wing19816

2 жыл бұрын

@@borisslavk01nolastname91 there wasnt really anything in them, apart from a couple pieces of old uniform and battered bits of the tank

@borisslavk01nolastname91

2 жыл бұрын

@@wing19816 Were the bits of old uniform from the tank crew that died there or it was their essential everyday things?

@wing19816

2 жыл бұрын

@@borisslavk01nolastname91 just the uniform from the dead tank crew

I thought the t-14 didn’t go into mass production pretty sure there’s 26 not 2600

@NickMaxwelll

2 жыл бұрын

found a lot of problems, so until the tank went into mass production

3:02 i chuckled immediatley when you mention your worker launching a revolution

*sees title*: "cool soviet tanks!" *video demo shows potatoes*: "I'm sorry, is this some sort of russian joke that I'm too american to understand?"

@danshakuimo

2 жыл бұрын

I thought the potato thing was an American joke about the Russians

@sooryan_1018

2 жыл бұрын

@@danshakuimo Also a British one about the Irish

@mirzaramishbaig8980

2 жыл бұрын

Yes

@TheRifild

2 жыл бұрын

@@sooryan_1018 and Russian about Belorussian

@hyperx72

2 жыл бұрын

"Why are we using potatoes instead of grenade?"

Russian Empire smart people: How about we will start to product tanks like France and Britain? Nikolas the Second: *TSAR TANK*

@kaytato4473

2 жыл бұрын

HAHHAHAHAHA the tsar tank was so bad

@rasmusdamkjr5270

2 жыл бұрын

@@kaytato4473 Agreed

@user-mg7ji9jf3e

2 жыл бұрын

The idea of tsar tank did not belong to him. It was created: Николаю Николаевичу Лебелденко. (Я не ебу как это на английском написать)

@ykk6744

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mg7ji9jf3e "Nikolay Nikolayevich Lebeldenko"

@jackmassam3293

2 жыл бұрын

Even though it never saw service I wanted an animation of it getting stuck in the mud lol

Hey can you make a video on the IS Tank family (IS, IS-1, IS-2, IS-3, IS-4, IS-5, IS-6, IS-7, IS-8, and IS-9).I know that these were mainly prototypes and few were ever built of each but i just think that it would be a cool video. These are my Favourite tank's ever designed and i would just love to see a video just on them. Please and thank you.

at 2:50 - dang that tanks Barrel is long

3:08 tanks exclusively and we will not be covering small arm vehicles, tank destroyers or self propelled guns. KV 2:SHIT, what am I?

@hunterbg6651

2 жыл бұрын

A russian death fridge

@winchesterchua7600

2 жыл бұрын

Heavy Tank.

@zacharytang3840

2 жыл бұрын

@@winchesterchua7600 technically it was more of an SPG than anything else. It was armoured and armed like a darned heavy tank, but it wasn’t really meant for upfront combat and more of an SPG role.

@zacharytang3840

2 жыл бұрын

@@hunterbg6651 darn right you are

"Now behold, the Russian Death Fridge"

@The-Floor.

2 жыл бұрын

*run*

@The-Floor.

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlphaPhoton **laughs in Leopard 2A7**

@The-Floor.

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlphaPhoton **Laughs in Armor piercing fin stabilized discarding sabot round A.P.F.S.D.S**

@The-Floor.

2 жыл бұрын

@@AlphaPhotonIs this reffering to war thunder?

@RenneDanjoule

2 жыл бұрын

You know what wasnt Russian? The Soviet Union.

If I'm correct, the explosive reactive armour is made from depleted uranium, mainly because it's quite dense, denser than lead.

Alternate title for video, "persons car destroyed as it was left in the way of Russian tank parade"

Is this gonna become a series with the bri'ish and americans or no

@namesurname624

2 жыл бұрын

@A H post 50' British production is sadder with every year. US pushing out home manufacturing and forcing too much standartisation.

@canon-de-75

2 жыл бұрын

And French

@canon-de-75

2 жыл бұрын

@A H The Cromwell and Churchill, and the Matilda II and Crusader, along with the Centurion, are superb tanks

@canon-de-75

2 жыл бұрын

@@namesurname624 At least they produce their own tanks at all.

@enderjed2523

2 жыл бұрын

@A H Oh boy was the A1E1 Independent, Archer, Challenger and (Technically) the Matilda Frog/Hedgehog (Australia) and the Bob Semple (New Zealand) all confusing abominations.

About the T-64: the armor thickness was measured in the effectiveness of different shells because composite armor was introduced, which was more effective against HEAT rounds. It was measured in the equivalent protection in steel.

Forget the BT-20 it's the A-32 and A-34 the A-32 had the christie convertible suspension the A-34 which would ultimately be produced as T-34 didn't have the convertible suspension Since the conversion took up too much internal space

"Hans, why is there a fridge driving toward us?" Hans: THATS NOT A FRIDGE-

I didn't realize the American, Christie had such an influence on Soviet tank design

@BranflakesEnby

2 жыл бұрын

It was perfect for the vast, open terrain of Russia/Eastern Europe. Christie tried selling his tanks to the US Army, but they basically told him "Boy we in the middle of a depression, do you think we can afford tanks!?", so he went to the Soviets, and the rest is history. The BT series was really impressive for the time. They were the fastest tanks around at that point, and had one of the better tank guns of the inter-war era (When most tanks were rocking 20mm autocannons or 37mm anti-tank cannons, the Soviets standardized on a whopping 45mm cannon) Their performance during the war was a little disappointing, but they were designed as offensive weapons, to exploit breakthroughs in enemy lines. Instead they found themselves fighting a defensive war where none of the BT's advantages could be used (Though they did kick the crap out of the Japanese during their border conflicts in Manchuria)

@ivanchemeris9632

2 жыл бұрын

@@BranflakesEnby I always thought the Christie suspension was chosen because you can drive it without tracks, and due to the very low track resourse Soviets tanks had in the 30s

@St.Matthew422

2 жыл бұрын

@@ivanchemeris9632 low track resources? Bruh, soviet union had a LOT of metal to use on tracks due to the five-years-plan

@-J--vx7nv

2 жыл бұрын

Not only Christie, Garand also had influence. Kalashnikov's weapons were somewhat inspired by Garand M1's system. And people still believe Germans influenced AK... Also, barely anyone heard of Czech's self-loading rifle that inspired a lot of other designs. It's name is ZH-29.

@-J--vx7nv

2 жыл бұрын

@@St.Matthew422 are you gonna carry all of that metal on your tank? Also, the quantity doesn't mean quality.

The best part: -4 to +13 degrees Edit: and -4 / -7 / -11 km/h!

@sarven5974

2 жыл бұрын

Much more jovial than their depressed western counterparts

@darnit1944

2 жыл бұрын

Soviet tanks are so happy, they dont have depression

@howcanyoureadthistheresnop9244

2 жыл бұрын

@@howwl2163 also Russia is flat if I remember correctly that’s why most of there tanks don’t have a lot of depression i think I’m wrong idk

Good share,very comprehensive, presentation!

- stalin you lying bastard why does your tractor have a gun?! - they are... from... america! We imported some american tractors to study them. - seems legit.

Vezdehod actually translates to “go any where vehicle”

@TheFatMob

2 жыл бұрын

It's called an ATV in English.

@dsheshin

2 жыл бұрын

все верно он перевёл и грамотно

@bananas1350

2 жыл бұрын

Dont trust google translate

@bananas1350

2 жыл бұрын

Thats what i learned

7:12 "The basic model 1940 T-34" Shows a T-34 with a 57mm.

@aviaoc07

2 жыл бұрын

Yea I noticed that, they drew a f-34 gun instead of the l-11 lmao.

Wellll, they didn't actually BUILD ∼2300 T14's (although they said they would from 2015-2020, and have only built about 40, as of the posting of this comment, so they are just a tinsy tiny bit of schedule)