EXCELLENT video. It is an great choice for the countries who have purchased it. Thanks for the magnificient work and presentind the different variants.

From being the underdog to maybe becoming the best dogfighter, in BVR fights to WVR encounters!

@rectalvapor2234

4 ай бұрын

Well, should it manage to claim the title of best dogfighter in BVR that would certainly be a noteworthy achievement ;)

@Desire123ification

4 ай бұрын

@@rectalvapor2234: Bravo! For excelling in the art of idiocy, WVR means dogfighting. Besides "underdog" goes well with "dogfighter" phonetically - that was the aim. Any combatant who survives a BVR clash will end up in a WVR fight. Wow; for making an azz of yourself...

@rectalvapor2234

4 ай бұрын

@@Desire123ification You're not making any sense, WVR is an abbreviation that stands for Within Visual Range (and may or may not involve dogfighting), BVR (Beyond Visual Range) can by definition not involve dogfighting. WVR is something modern fighters strive to avoid entirely if at all possible. I now realize you're a kid, which is why I even bother explaining this.

@Desire123ification

4 ай бұрын

@@rectalvapor2234 A complete azz you are! Like I don't know the acronyms BVR and WVR and the meaning. To misconstrued a single word or statement and amplify it into an hyperbole.

@gonace

4 ай бұрын

@@Desire123ification don't do drugs and then jump into the commenting section on youtube, thanks!

A very informative and helpful video I was very fascinated by the design of the grippen j-39 all of them to be honest as well as how maneuverable they are. Thx for sharing your work with us

Its a beautiful jet with very European style attention to details. I have seen it in Aero India display. Fuselage r mating with wings flawlessly. Excellent engineering. 🎉👍🏼

Great video 👏🏻

The Jas-39C/D is NOT upgraded A/B airframes (only a few parts were used) . They are newbuilt.

@matsnorsten

4 ай бұрын

Wrong. 66 A units were remodified to C, 86 additional were built. However, C cannot be remodified to E

Wow😀 Nice video 👍🏻

nice work

you can ready a Jas in less than 15 min challenge any manufactory to manage that

Some mistakes: - Agressor: It's a proposal for SAAB for a figther who operated like agressor in trainning, that proposal becomes in 2017, using C version, but until now nobody interessing on it. - Maritime version: asking for a maritime version, SAAB did a study, verifying what he needs about 200 milions dollars to develope this version, but Brasil loses the your P.A.; then are in off for time.

Next time making English version of SAAB Gripen cockpit avionics.

@apersson850

3 ай бұрын

Lär dig svenska!

You forgot to mention Gripe S as in stealth !! Oops !!! maybe you didn't know about that??😁

Hi Buzz 😘

When can Ukraine have them?

@TheGnue

4 ай бұрын

As soon as they buy em i guess

@erikempire318

4 ай бұрын

Hopefully soone, UA pilots have been testing them out for almost a year now, and theres seams to be a majorety for sending around 10-20 C-variants. and the center party called for immediate discussions of it in parlamet as sone as the ascension in to Nato was done. So hopefully its in progress.

@sam140167

4 ай бұрын

2030

@user-fp2gr4ic3x

4 ай бұрын

Now when we swedes are in nato i think they would have the c variant maybe late 24

@Paplcate……bra wtf

aight im gonna call my goverment and tell them to change the name , we cant use EA, we dont wanna be associated by that shitty game company.

Downvoted for the Ai voice. Not acceptable.

stop saying " Gripppen" sounds stupid, its SAAB JAS 39 Griphoon

@peanutter

2 ай бұрын

Kind of more grrippenn

Gripen f doesnt even exist so she lying,

@bjornnordstrom

4 ай бұрын

Gripen F is being/ will be/ manufactured by Embraer in Brazil.

@kjell-oh7ez

4 ай бұрын

@@bjornnordstrom I think it is moved to Linköping.

@bjornnordstrom

4 ай бұрын

@@kjell-oh7ez Ok, so there's a change of plan. I didn't know that.

@ROBBER011

4 ай бұрын

She dosen't its in Linköping, Sweden where it all started!

@erikempire318

4 ай бұрын

F is only a two seated version of the E, they make a D or F variant for every so many c or e varients made.

Gripen OUTDATED - 4 generation with little plus

@citizens-Edz

4 ай бұрын

I’m not sure what information you get this from, forth gen fighters are still capable. And with the upcoming gripen E it’s defiantly a real plus model. Sweden’s main enemy Russia doesn’t use any fifth gen fighters on the battlefield. So using 4+ vs 4+ shouldn’t be a problem. Once again read up before you talk

@mattiskardell

4 ай бұрын

@@citizens-Edzthey have su-57s but lets be realistic. they dont have the capabilities to go into combat

@hemligx-sson8202

3 күн бұрын

Compared with what?

I don't know if the FAB people smoked crack, but that was Brazil's choice. They should have bought the Typhoon or Rafale...

@Victorfpy

4 ай бұрын

Cara ele e a melhor escolha que a FAB poderia ter feito, ele e versátil rápido de 4 geração ++ quasse um de 5, e ainda pode ser fabricado aqui na nossa casa, e por diversos outros fatores...

@palacete

4 ай бұрын

On the contrary, Typhon is a poor option compared to the JAS-39. The JAS-39 is an aircraft with much cheaper operating costs than its competitors, meaning it can train more than others. The JAS 39 has high technology, it can communicate with EAW planes like the R-99 with the radar turned off, which gives it an advantage in the air. The JAS-39 has stealth characteristics. In addition, there was technology transfer that benefits Brazil. As for the Rafale, Brazil shares a border with France and they have already had territorial disputes, it would be illogical for Brazil to buy it from the French.

@marcosAmaranteC

4 ай бұрын

@@VictorfpyO que vai ser fabricado aqui? Fuselagem? Caças voam sem motores? E os milhares de sensores? E o Radar? É a mesma lógica tosca das "Fragatas" Tamandaré, solda uma chapa de aço no Brasil e importa 1 milhão de componentes de vários países da Europa.

@palacete

4 ай бұрын

One hour flying the Typhoon costs 40 thousand dollars. 1 hour with the Gripen costs around 5 thousand dollars. Eurofighter Typhoon is not a good plane, any missile system can destroy it.

@marcosAmaranteC

4 ай бұрын

@@palacete Scorpène?

The JAS -39 Gripen is a good 4 generation fighter that have evolved to a 4.5 gen fighter and is a very good solution for smaller airforces with smaller budgets but the Fighter have a fatal flaw its very small wings they need to increase the wings to a 10 meter or 9.6meter wingspan so the fighter will gain to extra hard points and increase the airframe size by at least 1.5 meters and adopt the new version of the GE F-110 with 27.000 pounds of force or a upgrade version of the EF-200 from the Thyphoon is a lighter engine and have alot of growth avaible adopting a version with 25.000 pounds of trust and a vectoring trust version that have been already tested and implement a foward hardpoint to a targeting pod so the fighter get all their hardpoints for ordanances and then the swedish will have a top of the line fighter that have enjoyed alot from thecnology from the Thyphoon and other european companies, and sweden should go for a European engine that could be built in sweden because they will always have problems with America when they are competing for the same export contracts, Israel is a great example they won some contracts to Europe like Croatia and others will follow but Americans put a stop on the engines and parts for the F-16I soufa Viper that is superior to the block 50\52 i dont know about the newest block 70\72 but i doubt that the Americans are superior to the Israeli fighter, the Gripen is just like the IAI LAVI a great fighter that Israel just decided to drop the development because of those same restrictions and financial constrains, but is just like the gripen just pick the blueprints and SAAB just built the Fighter i doubted but the similarities cannot be ignore. I think the Lavi from IAI actually was to be a awesome fighter with it was now a days that the Israeli industry just got extremly advanced and mature in electronics and weapons integration and capable of producing almost everything for a advanced fighter like the Lavi that is just like the JAS -39 Gripen or the other way. The clear similaraties cannot be ignore its just adopted from that project, SAAB Defence is one of the greatest defence companies in the world and always was ground breaking in advanced weapons design but come on or was just a big coincidence

@erikempire318

4 ай бұрын

for the wingspan, it will naver change as long as the swedish airforce is the number one client. it is made that way to fit any road to follow the idea of disperced opertaions. The concept is not about the size of the country it has more to do with the closeness to the potential enemy. Gripen is a usless fighter for americans, brittish and french airforces but gold for nordic and east/central european countries. The enemy can bomb any airfeald when the jet gets rearmed, feuled and repared in a forest by the road, and fast. For example compaing the for example the gripen with f35 i cuite daft. The F35 is a spear head build operate far from the battlefield while the gripen i basicaly a geurilla fighter built to operate from the battlefield.

@caravaggio31

2 ай бұрын

@@erikempire318 Why useless?

@erikempire318

2 ай бұрын

@@caravaggio31 Yeah useless was a bad choise of word. A F35 could be fairly useless for Sweden as they need advanced tech and runways that would likely be bomed the firs day. Grippen is extreamly capable fighter that takes out the f35 3 out of four. As a sweed i would nog change the grippens to anything but maybe complement them with 20 f35 och f22 for recon or deep strike missions.