MacReady to Childs: ""Why Don't We Just Wait Here For A Little While, See What Happens? Maybe we could watch The Thing playlist on Sci-Fi Station whilst we wait?" - kzread.info/head/PLbV8PUWO1igACXJ7-130oEwxa1OTG6OMX Subscribe to Sci-Fi Station for more of the greatest Film & TV Science Fiction moments - kzread.info

@Viniciu3393

5 ай бұрын

The Thing Movie is Good 😊😊😊 14:03

@radchanokptch3464

5 ай бұрын

จะ///ถขคำไรคำไร

@radchanokptch3464

5 ай бұрын

Woo 02 11390 it😊

@vybui4867

5 ай бұрын

Uncanny

The film that changed My life, I watch this on ITV in 1985..and on a documentary I wanted to be a monster maker..now I have my own SFX monster making shed..all thanks to this film.

@roanoke_fanboy490

4 ай бұрын

Do you have any pictures of some online?

@user-cb2bn9od6k

24 күн бұрын

Good for you good for you

the fact that on windows death for a second it showed palmer thing wearing a different color shirt, and when copper died his sleeves are suddenly rolled up

I wonder what happens to the hosts counsciousness? Does the thing completely erase it from the existence or are the host still alive after the assimilation but suffering under the thing's control?

@user-if7zd5fp5l

6 ай бұрын

They feel everything

@finlandguy427

6 ай бұрын

@@user-if7zd5fp5l So the victims are still alive after the assimilation?

@user-if7zd5fp5l

6 ай бұрын

@@finlandguy427 like their cells are getting taken over they can still feel and see everything thats going on

@amazo88

6 ай бұрын

well, you wont be alive when the thing changes you. there is no host. it changes you cell by cell. in the end, you are no longer human. you are an alien that looks like a human.

@firstnamelastname1760

5 ай бұрын

@@user-if7zd5fp5l I thought the subjects were killed but there bodies and memories were replicated.

I think Adam has the worst fate out of all these characters, haha

It's clear as night and day, how much better the practical effects of the 1982 version look, when compared to the CGI in the 2011 version

Question: Why didn't Adam just stand up and run away? If he couldn't run, his legs should have been able to scoot him away when he ran into a room and closed it; for example.

@AlphaTheBird

16 күн бұрын

It was already too late

@Dj_Raptor196

12 күн бұрын

Yeah it was way to late the thing had already touched him so he was done for

Hope the sequel comes out.

@guillermorojasc

7 ай бұрын

I wish they adapt The Thing: northman nightmare comic.

If a sequel comes out for the thing, I bet it would focus on the Soviet Unions perspective.

I don't quite get the logic in the Thing's methods. 1. I understand Henrik's case, the Thing was quite new, it didn't know how humans react to an assimilation attempt. 2. After his first attempt ended in flames, he tried to be more stealthy, we didn't notice a thing from Juliette's and Griess' assimilation. This is also very logic. 3. Then the first thing I don't understand: How come it had to attack Kate so openly and agressively? Why couldn't it be just as stealthy as with e.g. Juliette? If it works with touching the victim (Adam) or grabbing by hand (Blair), why is this flexing needed? Kate was an easy prey there, and it ruined the whole situation with this agressive attack. 4. In dog-form the Thing is now much more experienced, he starts brilliantly, assimilating the first victim, probably Norris, with full discrecy. Then why does it have to transform among those other dogs? Why couldn't it just wait for the morning and assimilate some other men, still not knowing a thing? (I mean: in dog form, it saw that MacReady and Doc bring the dead amalgam-Thing so probably they will find out something about it, but that would've been still more time than just instantly finding out everything because of its transformation.)

@Thekidloquendero9745

4 ай бұрын

Those are very good questions The thing's mistakes can be that it was selfconfident enough to belive it could assimilate Kate quite fast while being agressive However there's other fact I don't get

@IvanSerestov

4 ай бұрын

The problem is that we think about the Thing in a human way. I'm not sure this Thing is that logic, for me it's more a mix between a disease and an animal. I think most times when it tries to assimilate other people that's because it is hungry, simply... Or because it is being discovered and so has no other choice than to try killing everybody around... It also seems to be more stable in hound form than in human form, maybe because it is more complicated to mimic a human than a hound ? 🤔

@armin_iry

4 ай бұрын

Well, I mean the answers for both is because it seemed like the time to put a "reveal" scene there by the filmmakers, but that's the boring answer. We can speculate that the thing transforming instead of stealthily attacking is it asserting dominance over it's prey like many other animals do. Now the transformation in the cage could be that it felt cornered and threatened in the cage 🤷🏻‍♂️

@JhonathanDj1003

4 ай бұрын

you know, thinking about it I have an especulation about how it actually worked, if you think about it the thing always transforms when it is in the most unfortunate situation or the most advantageous. So I think more than it being on purpose it was more of an timer thing or uncontrollable instict of attacking his victims, like an "incompatible" host that can't stay in his normal form. Thats why with other bodies it can stay much longer undercover. Or it's not that complicated and they just wanted to show each transformation from each infested host and show that the creature is just that feral and violent.

@yeahimethan5968

3 ай бұрын

my best assumption, the more it splits, the less it remembers, it only remembers what their victims do, but as they get destroyed, it loses that experience, memory etc, it cant copy it where two thing remember the same stuff, and sacrificing all that biomass to keep itself alive probably doesnt help, but its instinct is to stay alive at all costs

a horrifying creature is chasing you, pick one A. run as fast as you can and escape the monster B. run the lowest you ever ran and trip over everything possible even if its not in your way C. just stand there and get eaten the people in this movie: "ima go with B or C"

@aceu.c.veteran5167

20 күн бұрын

I pick A.

The one from 1982 is so unbelievably good. Easily in my top 3 horror movies ever

9:22 for the thing 2011 haters

The dog transforming into the Thing in the 1982 film is so incredibly gross! 🤢 The special effects in the 1982 film are far superior than the 2011 film.

They should make a game about the thing in the style of until dawn.

You guys realize that Blair was actually a hero? Before getting assimilated he stopped the thing from ever escaping into the real world by getting rid of everything the thing could use to escape.

1982 film 🔛🔝

The blood went like AAAAAAHHHHH!!!

everytime that damn flamethrowers ...

Okay but why do people hate CGI? I think it's pretty cool..

Lost count of how many times I've seen it since it was released back in 1982, bought it on VHS when it first came out and i wore the tape out, got it on dvd back in 2002, seen it a few times on TV, as well as a matter of fact it's on film 4 tonight (16/ 02 /24,) got it in to record, P. S. Seen it 3 times in one week when it was released back in 1982, the best horror /Sci fi film ever made in my honest opinion

yo y los panas cuando hacemos un test quien es un transespecie: 16:40

still the best one

From among us it was based on this movie

@Karliz_officialtv

3 ай бұрын

That was i was saying

Fire is the best invention of all time 🔥

Wouldn't be a thing movie without a dead dog, right? -Dead Meat

Gotta say I really dig this scene. That… THING!!!… looks so alien. Looks like some bizarre horse with like Starship Trooper Arachnid legs eating through its gut. 0:26 Both darn good movies.

That’s why freezing it was always the best option. Idk why neither crew adapt to the snow and trapped it

La película merece un 10

Adoro esse filem

I love those movies

It just wanted to be loved...

I love the CGI

@skullinheaven22

4 ай бұрын

I hate the CGI it’s not the same and pales in comparison as the practicality of the 1982 thing.

9:22 that secne yukine chris react that

true terror and suspense

Like this film

The Thing 1982. in de best horror sf movie

They hurt the alien

Julletie looks like FROM Micry celer

THE easter EGG IN horror TALE 1 posters DEATH park and THE thing

During the dog transformation, just before Childs began to burn it, did anyone notice a green colored human eye looking right at him before the face split open? Would anyone care to guess whose eye that belonged to? Had to have been from someone in the 2011 crew.

I'm thinking, would humanity be able to survive against this plague if that happened?

@user-km2iz8rk4f

4 ай бұрын

It would have to be destroyed in captivity like this. Because if any military branch on earth got ahold of it that would be the worst outcome. They would try and weaponize it and it would eventually escape. A creature that's survived millions of years longer than humans would eventually get smart and find a way to free itself. And like any parasite it's only objective is to spread and survive.

@blugy9988

4 ай бұрын

probably not

@wendigogorilla7823

20 күн бұрын

Nope. We will become a giant gorgeous flesh( 8 billion people + animals)

1982 > 2011

At ye end if this film there is no steam coming from the black Guys mouth but you can hardly see the white guy for steam . He also says he went and got lost in a storm!? What storm it’s a clear night while they are fighting the final form plus he would not go out alone after it. I think he is the thing.

Oh. Oh😮

I know the 2011 thing is a huge step down from the 1982 one, what with the CGI, carbon copying the Carpenter one, and the acting…but one thing I’ll say. The sound design they used, specifically for Juliet? Terrifying. So they get a point or two for that in my opinion.

Snaaaaaaaaake

Shotgun with incedinary round ( dragon breath ) will end the game in one place

this hurts my guts.

Lars🖤🖤🖤🔥🔥🔥my man

I don't understand why in the 2011 version it had those hooks, or whatever you want to call them, but in the Kurt Russell version it didn't. It's 2 completely different Things. :) :)

こっちの方がバイオっぽいわ

I think both Among us and this film are all connected together.

Among us be like.

21

brih

Wh- wa- umm- excuse- wh- wat- ..

The hand assimilation and face assimilation are the worst ones

@slamdoezgamez

Ай бұрын

Question: Why didn't Adam just stand up and run away? If he couldn't run, his legs should have been able to scoot him away when he ran into a room and closed it; for example.

فيلم مرعب جدا

I feel uncomfortable watching this 😅😅😅😅😅😅

Shame I feel sorry for the dog

@user-lx3th5on8l

2 ай бұрын

Yeah he was a very handsome doggy

Please tell me they didn't hurt any real dogs during production?

@lionelalias4561

7 ай бұрын

They killed 100.

@ferdinand5223

6 ай бұрын

They massacred an entire breed of dogs specifically to make these two movies.

@lionelalias4561

6 ай бұрын

Yes and they cooked them with the flamethrower and ate them.

@joelang3217

6 ай бұрын

They dissected and combined hundreds of dogs to create the Thing.

@samschmit7181

6 ай бұрын

@@joelang3217 Please tell me you guys are joking.

Guys, are you think it is among us reference or not?

@LONELY-VISUAL

4 ай бұрын

I really think so...

@coolnoob8216

4 ай бұрын

The thing came out before among us and I think among us was inspired like the thing

@steroids_on_steroids2208

4 ай бұрын

The Thing came out back in 1982, almost 40 years before among us released. Among us’s basic premise is heavily inspired by The Thing, and not the opposite. The thing’s inspiration came from the 1950s horror movie The Thing from Another World, which in turn took inspiration from John Campbell’s horror novella Who Goes There?

❤❤all too alien , touch under the ice mantle?? There is something underwear?!

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Why is it so dark? I can't see anything.

Probably this scene is gross...>_

15:30😳🤮

1:48 Among us Reference?

कुछ भी

The 2011 version was trash. Nothing beats the 1982.

My got the splinted face on on the helicopter was such bad CGI. 🥶💀

James arness was the original thing and that just might as well have ended there because the original from the fifties was the best and I don't care about all these gorefest pieces of crap remakes

@byonemesis

8 ай бұрын

Though James Arness made an excellent job as the "Thing", I disagree. The 1982 and 2011 movies are more faithful to the original novella from 1938. This "Thing" from these 2 movies was far more disturbing to watch than the 1951's, mostly because it only assimilated one host, while the "Thing" from the 2 movies could assimilated anyone as long there's contact as the "Thing" is an independant organism in each cell. In other words, it's like the X Parasite from Metroid Fusion if you want a simpler comparison : 1 cell, 1 thing. Make no mistake though, both iterations of the "Thing" would have lead to the same horrific ending : if it reaches civilization, all of Earth would have been doomed, humans and animals alike.

@Richardzmaxdragway

8 ай бұрын

@@byonemesis you know it's very refreshing to have a conversation or have a reply to a comment made by somebody who's willing to put some thought into it and put forth his opinion based on facts and a very well thought-out articulated way. Your opinion has made me think of things in a little bit different light even though I still prefer the older movies just because I like the old classic movies however your opinion has very extremely strong points one of which is that I did not know there was a novella from 1938. I will have to check it out

@byonemesis

8 ай бұрын

@@Richardzmaxdragway No problem. We agree to disagree. Fun fact : when I was quoting the game Metroid Fusion, it's not out of coincidence : The Thing clearly inspired Nintendo to create the X parasite which has the same ability : mimicking its victims, although the difference is that the X parasite has its original form, while the "Thing's" original form is still unknown to this day...

It's creepy looking

🇫 🇺 🇪 🇺 🇫

2011 - żałosne, feministyczne GÓWNO, gdzie przerażeni i nieudolni faceci biegają, krzyczą i płaczą, a jakaś baba (która co najwyżej nawaliłaby w gacie i zemdlała od pisku) spokojna i opanowana podejmuje walkę i wyręcza zbędnych samców. co za GÓWNO! tak się rujnuje epickie dzieła (Indiana Jones, Gwiezdne Wojny, Terminator etc)