JRE: "The Role of Intuition and Quackery in Scientific Discovery" 👉 kzread.info/dash/bejne/oWap0tyMZa6Wcso.html

@BidenIsKing

Жыл бұрын

Weinstein proving he is a fool once again.

@geemanbmw

9 ай бұрын

​@@BidenIsKingboo hoo!

@BidenIsKing

9 ай бұрын

@@geemanbmw did he cry? He is a huge 🐈!

@eac26114653

8 ай бұрын

Tyson has his bachelors (Harvard), masters (Univ of Texas), and Ph.D. (Columbia). He is well-credentialed to be considered a "scientist".

@timapple6586

8 ай бұрын

@@eac26114653 'Well-credentialed' means he must surely have hundreds of peer-reviewed academic publications under his belt, right? But he has only 5, and probably hasn't been published in over 30 yrs. Not a scientist. He's an evangelical Scientismatic.

I always thought Neil Degrasse Tyson was an actor portraying an astrophysicist

@BlueLeon2287

Жыл бұрын

Like bill nye

@sethtaylor3917

Жыл бұрын

Same

@johnbryan2414

Жыл бұрын

basically, he is. he's too arrogant to be worthy of my attention because arrogance gets it wrong more often

@192OOIDJJ3

Жыл бұрын

Fk him, he's way too defensive for casual conversations.

@padstowphantom

Жыл бұрын

No. You're thinking of that lad from Big Bang Theory.

Lot's of dumb people misinterpret what Weinstein is saying. He's saying Tyson knows physics and is excellent at explaining it. But he is not a practicing physicist in the sense that he's not doing research to push it's boundaries or solve unanswered questions. He's simply an expert on understanding and explaining the current body of knowledge.

@ultrameticulous

7 ай бұрын

I just saw him say "LEDs convert 100% of their energy into light" when typically 50-60% is lost to heat. Nothing being 100% efficient is a basic fact. He's also very closed-minded. Eric is correct here. When you see he often doesn't even listen and let someone finish sentences, there's no way he's going to break ground.

@spracketskooch

7 ай бұрын

He's saying that Neil doesn't have the ability to do novel science, because he's incapable of thinking outside the box and resisting social pressures to pursue ideas.

@coolrunnings617

7 ай бұрын

@@spracketskooch Exactly..

@benjaminebenezer2084

7 ай бұрын

NDT is the grown-up's version of Bill Nye. Fun to watch, can drop fun facts like no one's business, but he is not a knowledge creator. True scientists discover new truths and expand human knowledge. NDT's greatest accomplishment is that he "contributed" (did not lead) research that eventually led to Pluto being demoted as a planet decades ago. Yet, NDT is as famous as Einstein today because of social media and communication skills, which are useful in a narrow way to promoting science, but not doing science. I suppose science needs salespeople too.

@wrongthinker843

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, sure.

Me trying to convince my wife any of my ideas are good “the best scientists were all boarderline quacks”

@qthirteen13

6 ай бұрын

The only way to convince a wife is to divorce them or trick them into thinking it was her idea 😂

@JamesHeller-if5kg

5 ай бұрын

We give women wsy too much say in life

@jadonlawrence4909

5 ай бұрын

​@@JamesHeller-if5kg😂😂😂😂😂

@jkvoot

5 ай бұрын

But the implication dont go both ways

@gibshredcamel

4 ай бұрын

@@JamesHeller-if5kg you don’t have to little bro. I choose to bc i believe that’s the right way to treat people but there are a lot of ways to live this life. None of them include telling other people what they do is wrong.

Neil de grasse tyson has perfected the art of explaining science stuff in a way that most people can understand. Arguably the best explainer of all time.

@halley4032

5 ай бұрын

Maybe one of the best science explainers in the US, although I find him too 'noisy and political, much prefer Michio Kaku. In UK, we have Jim Al Khalili and Brian Cox.

@ItsGamingFancy

5 ай бұрын

​@@halley4032Kaku and tyson are the same. I do like Brian Cox though. And Brian Greene, Sean Carrol, and Leonard Susskind. Although Susskind isn't as prominent as everyone else here

@Al-Storm

4 ай бұрын

​@@ItsGamingFancyThey aren't the same. Tyson is argumentative, constantly interrupts people, and talks down to people. Kaku does none of that.

@ItsGamingFancy

4 ай бұрын

@@Al-Storm they both always talk like they're selling something. I used to watch all these guys all the time but Tyson and Kaku just kind of got old to me

@halhal-my4pt

3 ай бұрын

Nope he is just another cheer leader who didn't see any other way to make a living.

"Jamie, pull up that video of a bear doing borderline science"

@ghijbvhiigvh3940

7 ай бұрын

man… this jokes a little played out now…

@Person0fColor

7 ай бұрын

It got 154 likes in 2023 😂 Incredible

@jackfiercetree5205

7 ай бұрын

😂

@jackfiercetree5205

7 ай бұрын

​@ghijbvhiigvh3940 but this is one of the best ones. I have read... SoOoo Many and this is the first time I cried laughing.

@tommiepattonkendrickiii1617

6 ай бұрын

​@@jackfiercetree5205, hold on, you mean to tell me that you read that 'Jamie pull up the video...' joke and it made you laugh so hard that you were crying? 🤦‍♂️ you're either lying your ass off or you're 12 years old... it's one or the other

I was waiting for NDT to jump in and interrupt

@colinsoder

8 ай бұрын

😅😅😅😅😅

@razbigranicu

3 ай бұрын

IF YOU VALUE MOUNTAIN CLIMBING...

@lapizza7175

2 ай бұрын

But but in Harry Potter

Bill NYE doesn’t get nearly half as much hate as Neil Tyson… and Neil is waaaaaaaay more educated 😂😂I wonder why.

@emilmaze

5 күн бұрын

Because Neil DeGrasse Tyson is ultra arrogant

@Horrortelltales

11 сағат бұрын

Because he's with the basketball people

Eric, "Neil is not a physicist at a practicing level..." Joe, "Are you a scientist at a practicing level..." Eric, "No, but in my defense, I must say that I'm a borderline quack, but about you, Joe?" Joe, "I can quack like a duck. That sh^t is tough, man"

@JuanPena-bx8qm

6 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@BakoZoltan

6 ай бұрын

Perfect summary 👌

@jackharle1251

6 ай бұрын

Neil is a token, period.

@sartajbhullar3782

6 ай бұрын

Haha

@ArdentLion

6 ай бұрын

But is he wrong about anything? No? Then STFU lol

Neil is what he says he is: A Science Communicator.

@neddanison9202

9 ай бұрын

The problem with science communicators is that they tend to be dogmatic and double down on their particular take while people doing scientific research have moved on. Richard Dawkins is one such communicator. His take on genes was quickly outdated, yet he never updated his book, for example.

@adrianmizen5070

9 ай бұрын

Science propagandist. Who uses his celebrity to lend weight to his opinions on divisive societal issues that are far outside his area of supposed expertise. Opinions that just so happen to line up with his paymasters, much like Bill Nye's.

@EpicLemonMusic

9 ай бұрын

@@neddanison9202lolwut, wrong. Dawkins take on Genes? Fucking idiotic wording first of all, but Dawkins evolutionary dictations from all of his books to this day are the standard in Biology, the fucking standard, he also has admitted when certain things were wrong and changed them and rewrote entire notes to his books. All the things that you probably think Dawkins got wrong are highly contentious, unfleshed out ideas. I would love to hear just a single of example from you, you can even be vague and I will do the research, because you sir most likely have an ass derived comment.

@EpicLemonMusic

9 ай бұрын

@@VanMan83 what are you talking about, Genders are apart of science whether you think it is illness or he thinks it is not, it still exists, it is observable. The idea of genders is 100% confirmed in existence, political ideology aside. The fact that there are binary sexes also is scientifically false, there is no such thing as non binary, but there is XY, XX, XXY, X, XYY, and XXXY, the people who have these not so rare chromosonal disorders have nothing to do with gender, this is chromosomal sex. Bill Nye is a smart engineer and amazing science communicator and you are likely a lowly maggot in comparison.

@i8764theKevassitant

9 ай бұрын

​@@VanMan83I mean there's been some discoveries regarding xy chromosomes and intersex people that kind of changed our perspectives on gender identity

It's his ego that hurts him.

@Jus7here

Жыл бұрын

Arrogance ages you. Its the worse thing you can be specially if you are a scientist, if you think you know everything you stop taking different perspectives and that just ages your mind. Since you dont really receive any inputs from other people that could actually be beneficial to your own ideas.

@bartonstink

Жыл бұрын

He wasnt always the way he is now. The more famous he got, the more his arrogance came to the forefront of his persona.

@Robertmartines

Жыл бұрын

He is NOT a practicing scientist. An actual practicing scientist can entertain multiple possibilities at once.

@deadguysripppingmylungz

Жыл бұрын

You took a narrative and spinned it he’s saying Neil can’t take risk because if he’s wrong even once weirdos like you are gonna pull his card and say he never really was a scientist stop hating bro Shits bad vibes

@youlig1

Жыл бұрын

​@@Robertmartines I don't think you need to have multiple personality to be a scientist xD. In fact, i think it's the other way around...

I studied astrophysics under Neil and briefly worked for him at AMNH. This is accurate, but this was Neil's very calculated choice (he made a decision to walk a straight line in science, and he's done that well). Neil knew his strengths and played to those strengths. He is not a physicist or researcher.

LOL Neither is Weinstein. Take a brief tour of what the 'practicing physicist' community has to say about Eric's theory of 'Geometric Unity.' Given the topic of Weinstein's critique - why would anybody seek out a (yet another) non practicing presenter for substantiation of the viewpoint?

When he caved on the gender issue, he lost all my respect.

@kogiman

10 ай бұрын

So you like him cancelled?

@jamesyoung1356

10 ай бұрын

@@kogiman when you ignore science as a scientist, you cancel yourself.

@audiofunkdialect

8 ай бұрын

So when you disagree with somebody on something you lose all respect for them in your personal life, do you do that?

@josephmango4628

8 ай бұрын

@@audiofunkdialect Neil is a brilliant guy, no doubt. It's not about disagreements. When a scientist disregards scientific facts, they can no longer be considered such. He lost a lot of followers when speaking on gender fluidity. People can't be both genders because of how they feel on a given day. Crazy talk.

@audiofunkdialect

8 ай бұрын

@@josephmango4628 dude I don’t understand transgender ideology I have no fucking clue I’m a straight male I don’t know what that feels like. I don’t know if all of them have legitimate feelings like that but I’m sure some people do we can be born with physical disfigurement you don’t think our brains can be a little off that probably is what is going on here. and I’m not trying to say they have mental in capacity. I’m saying that something like sexuality might be way different for some people you and I cannot put ourselves in their situation so I think it’s stupid to generalize in these situation.

“If at first the idea isn’t absurd, then there is no hope for it.” - Albert Einstein

@theclockmax

5 ай бұрын

I want to breathe in outer space without equipment. I guess there’s hope for it

@jamessmith6162

5 ай бұрын

@@theclockmax Bahahahaha Bahahahaha Okden lol!!! 😳🤣🤣😆🤯😆🤣🤣😂😆😅

@CynHicks

4 ай бұрын

"When walking on eggshells; it's best done with bare feet." - Sir Isaac Newton.

@roguesheep3083

4 ай бұрын

gonna pull that one on hot nerdy girls.

@shanejones578

4 ай бұрын

@@theclockmaxprobably possible, we just don’t know how yet.

Eric Weinstein criticizing someone else for being fake is a bold move

@RandomAussieGuy87

2 ай бұрын

I think his 'borderline quaks' comment was about himself. 😂

@moonlion7047

Ай бұрын

Edward Witten himself has adapted equations Eric literally wrote himself. His shortcuts into simplified quantum physics have been ground breaking. He quit mathematics because his work was not acknowledged but stolen and incorporated into what we know as quantum physics and string theory. This guy even said the only person he fears going up against intellectually is Witten himself. Everyone else, including this Walmart Tyson version cannot go up against this guy. Am not a bootlicker and I personally don't like this guys attitude but he is, believe it or not, probably the second smartest person alive right now. No cap.

@SamSullyV

Ай бұрын

@moonlion7047 I'm going to just acknowledge that everything you said is completely true without independent verification. Being smart in one field even being the best in that field, does not make you knowledgeable about all things and all fields. That seems to be his biggest problem

@moonlion7047

Ай бұрын

@@SamSullyV Please research it if you have free time. Personally I think the greatest minds went in the wrong direction entirely. My knowledge is extremely limited. Me compared to these guys is like teaching a chimpanzee to design a rocket. My personal opinion as to why is based on scale. We should have focused on other things. Fact is all of these guys aged and contributed immensely to a stagnant theory that is missing vital elements. Physics as a whole I guess is fundamentally based on the size scale and it is treated as a base form. A starting platform if you like but this is not the starting line. I wish I had 1/10 of the knowledge Eric has. Old Mate Tyson is a figure head and spokesperson. He is arrogant and self opinionated and usually will cut people off mid speech. He knows not to go against Eric because he would be exposed. I bet these two never debate. Anyway sorry for the rant.

@moonlion7047

Ай бұрын

Sam please research a subject before doing a comment like that. I will assume you had no previous knowledge. These guys are not even close as far as IQ goes. We have had many now surpass even Einstein. It all depends what field these autistic geniuses have. As far as this goes Eric would disintegrate Neil.

Everyone smacking on Neil missing the irony that Eric is a mathematician who won't shut up about politics and social issues.

@cmonman3639

7 ай бұрын

Neil fanboy identified

@MikeB-ng3ol

7 ай бұрын

@@cmonman3639 Whether or not someone likes him doesn't change the logic.

@cmonman3639

7 ай бұрын

@@MikeB-ng3ol Neil deGrasse Tyson is an absolute idiot who says men can become women. Great science right there.

@Gee-xb7rt

7 ай бұрын

@@cmonman3639 I'm not a fan of Neil, but Eric is an annoying podcast techbro that believes himself to be smarter than he is. If you took all the hundreds of millions of hours of podcast techbros yammering on about something you might get 15 minutes of worthwhile content.

@jonathansutton1447

7 ай бұрын

@Gee-xb7rt Huh, what you described is exactly how I feel about Neil; the guy just talks to seem smart and hear his own voice lmfao. Then again I don’t watch many podcasts because most all of them are just listening to some random guy blab about some pointless crap. I definitely have time for it, but not the patience to wait for them to get to the point hahaha.

Neil doesn't even know what a woman is lol.

@stijnvdv2

8 ай бұрын

Neil is a great orator.... and probably a mediocre astrophysicist....he would probably be a great astrophysicist teacher, but he basically got everything else wrong coz he doesn't do his homework and tries to be a politician. He got global warming wrong. That's just bullocks All Gore politics w/o any scientific backing.... he then got the vaccine stuff wrong, like almost everything of it and then he went Bill Nye the not so science guy lunatic by trying to justify the woke mental illness about what is a woman. Among many other things btw... I did had respect for him about 15 years ago... meanwhile he lost all of it.

@beatonthedonis

8 ай бұрын

You mean he is willing to think outside of the scientific orthodoxy box?

@cjaydustie1867

8 ай бұрын

@@beatonthedonis “earth is flat” I’m a genius that thinks outside of scientific orthodoxy 🤗

@timtim818

8 ай бұрын

​@cjaydustie1867 so stunning and brave!

@innertubez

8 ай бұрын

Yeah he does.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s only problems are his arrogance, his manner, his ego and his ignorance

@drmantistoboggan2870

8 ай бұрын

First 3 are accurate but whats he ignorant of?

@anton7354

8 ай бұрын

@@drmantistoboggan2870 of these three things of his

@markfreeouf3453

8 ай бұрын

So, other than that, he's great, right? Lol

@billytheconqueror5803

8 ай бұрын

​@drmantistoboggan2870 his views on religion are ignorant and reddit tier cringe and shows a complete lack of history

@star_blazer

8 ай бұрын

​@@drmantistoboggan2870Everything outside of his specialty. For example, he’s ignorant of the most simple biological facts about the differences between men and women. I’ve noticed that many scientists speak with overconfidence about topics outside of their specialty. Usually philosophical topics, like the existence of objective morality or that of God.

"Jamie, pull up that video of a bear not really being a physicist."

Neil is a Harvard grad in Physics, with a PHD in Astrophysics from Columbia also having postdoctoral research from Princeton. That is DOCTOR Neil De grasse Tyson 🤓 let’s not take that away from him!

@joshtaylor6038

3 ай бұрын

Like you said, he's an astrophysicist. Like Weinstein said, which doesn't take away anything from Tyson, he isn't a practicing physicist. Weinstein, on the other hand, has made contributions to physics that far outweigh anything the talking head, Tyson, has.

@sidiquegeloo1816

Ай бұрын

Thank you

@GallifreyanGunner

15 күн бұрын

@@joshtaylor6038 You are exaggerating. Weinstein has proposed *one* theory that he hasn't yet published in full for peer review. A *draft* of the paper was released with this interview and it has already been criticized as being full of "gaps" that jeopardize the whole of the proposed theory. At this point, he hasn't really contributed much. NDT has authored or co-authored MANY papers in his career.

@nothingnewhere6551

7 күн бұрын

Good point! He has participated in research, and I think he could again if he wanted to. Sort of irresponsible to pigeon-hole someone like he is doing. All it takes for this to be made untrue is for Neil to sit down and start researching a new topic. I am not even sure it is broadly true now considering the points you've brought up. He is kind of saying that the only true physicists are those who are participating in the frontiers of physics: quantum gravity, dark matter...etc. The fact that none of the physics is confirmed yet and that publications are possible without experimental confirmation, for me, could even be used as a converse argument to what he is saying. The mark of a real physicist is that they research physics that isn't yet real. What a twist of logic!

Neil is just 2023's version of Bill Nye.

@holyguy2940

8 ай бұрын

He has a PhD, you have no idea what your talking about

@Silent_Quasar

8 ай бұрын

Bill nye never said he was a scientist he is a science communicators and a very good one. The idea was that anyone can do science you haters are missing the whole point. Gonna tell me carl Sagan wasn’t a practicing scientists Because he wrote books and did a tv show. NDT is a physicist he had a PhD and he did his thesis.

@demef758

8 ай бұрын

@@holyguy2940 Jill Biden has a PhD, too, meaning in your world that she's as smart as Neil.

@cordewilkes1638

8 ай бұрын

Are you 2023's version of anybody?

@victorfergn

8 ай бұрын

nope

Neil doesn't know what a woman is

@sandplasma

8 ай бұрын

He's married doofus.

@credman

8 ай бұрын

If I said "I met a man the other day, cool dude, I'll bring him to the next guys' poker night" and the man who shows up looks, acts, and sounds exactly like Megan Fox, would you feel misled?

@sirhenrystalwart8303

8 ай бұрын

@@credman Not if it had a wee wee

@credman

8 ай бұрын

​@@sirhenrystalwart8303Not even 1% surprised or misled. Thanks for letting us know you don't even believe what you're saying.

@stuartwiner7920

8 ай бұрын

@@credman That's a loaded question. Are their shorts loaded with something extra, or not? Either way, yeah - a bit misled.

Both Eric and Neil are not real scientists. However, at least Neil was a real scientist at the beginning of his career. But this guy has one publication during his PhD and only two citations on that. He practically contributed nothing to science.

Ironically The next short had Neil Degrasse Tyson in it

@Robdobalina

4 күн бұрын

Excellent determination on your part for scrolling back to say so

he's not ready to think. that's brutal

@Finians_Mancave

8 ай бұрын

If you think about it, Weinstein is saying every GREAT physicist has to think outside the box. That definition basically means the vast majority of physicists teaching physics, say, at universities (Who aren't breaking rules to test the boundaries of science) all fall under this category)! Strictly speaking, I believe that's true. Now, had Weinstein used this analogy, he would have made the same point without coming off as petty or jealous towards an individual... but for some reason he felt he had to single out NDT to make his point. Sorry, but that says more about Weinstein than NDT.

@missionpupa

8 ай бұрын

​@@Finians_Mancavehe stated a fact pretty objectively. I think you're the jealous one here in Weinstein, it says more about you really.

@Finians_Mancave

8 ай бұрын

@@missionpupa Weinstein has a PhD from Harvard in Physics who makes a living directing hedge funds and running a podcast. So he's not even a physicist. Your deflection at me was idiotic because I KNOW I'm not as smart as these guys, and openly admit it! Maybe you don't know what the word "jealous" actually means...

@sapnaa6576

7 ай бұрын

​@@Finians_Mancaveme too felt he is jealous of NDT. NDT has given me great knowledge in physics. He makes it easy for the layman to understand basic physics. And his excitement is contagious. Of course others in the scienctific community not as popular or successful will be jealous. As he is a very good orator. NDT is not that revolutionary out of the box scientist. So what, his videos are good for me.

I wouldn’t let degrasse cut my grass

@Dave_of_Mordor

8 ай бұрын

What do you mean by "grass"?

@davebritton7648

8 ай бұрын

I wouldn't let him 'de - grass' my lawn.

@davebritton7648

8 ай бұрын

@@Dave_of_Mordor Does it matter?

@Dave_of_Mordor

8 ай бұрын

@@davebritton7648 Yes Dave, it matters

@davebritton7648

8 ай бұрын

@@Dave_of_Mordor Not to me. I wouldn't let him anyway.

Says the guy who is not a physicist on any level

@gvngbvngiggy

5 ай бұрын

Okay so? Do i have to be a basketball player myself to say joe rogan isnt a basketball player?

@SI-qp7cm

5 ай бұрын

@@gvngbvngiggy no, this guy is a hack and an incredibly arrogant person. He goes around claiming to have solved unified theory, to call everyone else stupid and , much like his brother, lacks academic rigour to say the least. So when he talks about Physics and puts people down I get upset at it - especially given he is nothing more than a grubby hedge fund manager - working with Peter Tiel.

@yobro6053

5 ай бұрын

@@gvngbvngiggycan you even dunk, bro?

@kayjay7585

4 ай бұрын

​​@@gvngbvngiggy I don't have anything really against Eric Weinstein, but he is just a master at making himself sound ever so wise and mysterious and especially in saying things that will keep getting him invited on popular podcasts and shows. He is VERY bombastic and grandiose in his speech, but weirdly, nothing he ever says or claims has the grandiosity he ascribes to it. Like "the most scary human being" that's just some mathematician or his newest tale of saying that never in his life met a person that was so clearly a construction like Jeffrey Eppstein and backing it up with the most ridiculous claim that he never met someone less likely to take their life as Jeffrey Epstein. Sorry to bring the whole Epstein thing into it, but NOTHING about Weinstein's hypothesis has a shred of tangible evidence, nevermind the fact that Epstein clearly had means, motive and opportunity to end himself, with extreme emphasis on motive, being a severe case of covert grandiose narcissistic personality disorder who went from philanthropist billionaire to be known worldwide as a pedophile and having no chance to get out of incarceration. Narcissistic personality disorder has the highest suicide rate and the two most important things for a narcissist are reputation and being in control. Anyways, Eric Weinstein is literally a poser, change my mind.

@tvviewer4500

4 ай бұрын

@@kayjay7585he called out string therapy and changes the entire popular thought surrounding it

Neil always describes himself as a science educator. So what are we even talking about here?

Neil serves a crucial role in educating people about science. Not people who are interested and know some stuff. But people who are generally ignorant about science. His enthusiasm brings those people in and gives them a taste of our magnificent universe. But it seems to infuriate others who think they know some things. Let Neil be Neil. Understand he has value. If he upsets you, move on and let others gain some knoweledge.

@joshbrigham942

Жыл бұрын

I think the argument is that he only understands known physics and is at a level where he will never make any breakthroughs.. but your response here was definitely correct

@clicheguevara5282

Жыл бұрын

That’s one perspective. Another one is that he turns people off by perpetuating the stereotype of the smug know it all who has to constantly dominate the conversation and stroke his own ego. I agree though.. His target audience isn’t people who have a genuine interest in science. It’s the crowd who say they’re “really into science” because they watch Big Bang Theory and bought a NASA shirt at Target.

@joshbrigham942

Жыл бұрын

@@clicheguevara5282 you should read Ecclesiastes (Bible)

@kwakuquashie2599

Жыл бұрын

Hey, please move on with your life and stop defaming Neil's reputation. He is a critical thinker, period!!!?

@unclebobboomergames

Жыл бұрын

​@@clicheguevara5282 you seem like a glass house

Calling that guy a scientist is like calling a hot dog a bowl of soup.

@lifeisactuallyveryboring.7771

Ай бұрын

@@oldehuman252K In practice I mean because he's just mostly hanging out on his podcast acting like his shit don't stink. lol

Basically Neil Degrasse Tyson knows recipes but he can't cook.

Penicillin was discovered because a sloppy scientists refused to clean out his old agar plates.

@jordyb57

Жыл бұрын

That’s not what he meant but true lol

@DanielJamesEgan

Жыл бұрын

@@jordyb57 yeah not exactly the same lol. I was more thinking if that scientist had followed the procedures to a T and cleaned up like a good little scientist should then penicillin would not have been discovered at that time.

@danchristopher7957

Жыл бұрын

Not unlike LSD

@edwardwright2989

Жыл бұрын

hate to burst your bubble but we( the whole wide world) knew this by 1st grade.

@DanielJamesEgan

Жыл бұрын

@@edwardwright2989 this is an unfounded lie that only a moron would utter.

He’s not having any of it cause he’d be interrupting nonstop

@timmyvawwter8898

Жыл бұрын

Interruptor-in-Chief! that's a great title that actually depicts this horse's A§§ named NDT

@Tethloach1

8 ай бұрын

Lol

When he explained his response to Terrance Howard I got this feeling.

Wow this aged well. Eric is a ganger.

NDT is the Governments "science guy"

@justinw1765

8 ай бұрын

Part of his education was at Columbia and Columbia for a long time, was the hot bed of CIA undercover education. Though, that has shifted some to John Hopkins in more recent times, because Columbia got called out on it.

@73ajd1

8 ай бұрын

​@@justinw1765And nothing there is a fact, just another convenient narrative. You know nothing.

@wrongthinker843

7 ай бұрын

@@73ajd1 Sure, Tuskagee experiments were a narrative, too. Until they weren't.

@sorryidgaf.6043

2 ай бұрын

That would be Bill Nye.

Feynman was also a brilliant communicator…

@colonelarmfeldt8572

4 ай бұрын

Feynman was also a practising physicist, who helped develop quantum electrodynamics and the least action principle. NDT is a brilliant guy, but doesn't actually carry out any physics research. He is purely a communicator of science. It's not an insult, since they ultimately help inspire the next generation of physicists.

@_sayan_roy_

3 ай бұрын

Feynman, who is one of the very few people that have radically shaped my thinking on various matters even though I'm of a different culture (I'm an Indian) especially when I myself was aspiring to be a physicist (now a comp sci engineer), was a special personality in terms of communication , pedagogy and actual practice in and even around his field like investigating Space Shuttle Challenger accident. There is no comparison with NDT.

@NitinSatendraRawat

3 ай бұрын

Feynman was a quackhead that's for sure read his biography

@0ned

2 ай бұрын

These are all gatekeepers. Advancement in physics has been stifled because of their lies. Vortex Mechanics were replacing wave mechanics in German textbooks before WW2. Eddington 1919 was debunked by Charles Poor in 1930. Einstein admitted Dayton Miller disproved Special Relativity in 1925! None of these people are telling the true history of scientific suppression in the name of state secrecy.

@virtualatheist

Ай бұрын

This is the man who learned Spanish so he could give a speech at a Brazilian university... Let that sink in.

Here are 25 differential algebraists who do differential algebra. All of them super-geniuses in their own field. Carlos Arreche, Rick Churchill, Thomas Dreyfus, Victor Edneral, Sebastian Falkensteiner, Li Guo, Neil Hwang, Antonino Iannazzo, Partha Kumbhakar, Yunnan Li, Andy Magid, Ronnie Nagloo, Alexey Ovchinnikov, Dmitrii Pavlov, Daniel Robertz, Valerij Romanovskij, Chitrarekha Sahu, Eberhard Schruefer, Matthias Seiss, William Sit, Ivan Tomasic, Jorge Vargas, Michael Wibmer, Sihong Wu, Brian Wynne

Joe : "umn" 😂 Like he found the winner in the competition

Tyson is to physics what Segal is to martial arts.

@johnblaesel5493

9 ай бұрын

In other words, just an actor.

@mindblown42069

8 ай бұрын

Not remotely. Neil is one of the greatest sciftific promoters and communicators of our lifetimes. Literally billions of people have listened to him talk about high level sciftific concepts. Just because he is not a researcher doesn’t mean he is any less gifted at what he does and all he ever claims to be. Whereas Segal claims to have invented stuff and be some legend which Neil never ever claims.

@Dave_of_Mordor

8 ай бұрын

There are lots of black and white thinkers like you and johnblaesel in the comment. On behalf of humanity, I hope your kind never get into the scientific field.

@FTLGuillotine

8 ай бұрын

I don't get why people keep saying stuff like this, he's a real Astrophysicist who has co-written real, peer reviewed papers.

@ryanglenn7878

8 ай бұрын

Not true. Segal knows a little martial arts. He taught Aderson Silva (ex UFC champ) how to throw a front kick to the chin that's difficult to see coming.

Nor is Eric a practicing physicist… yet he pretends to speak for them.

@don_fami

Жыл бұрын

If that's true, then get em

@bernadettesandoval3990

Жыл бұрын

He speaks for himself

@pablokaufervinent8012

Жыл бұрын

Not true he solved the problems of the universe in a youtube video.

@bryanwilkens

Жыл бұрын

Truth

@Micscience

Жыл бұрын

So you have to be a practicing physicist in order to speak for them? It's not like he is talking about practiced science in this clip. He's talking about approach which isn't science.

NGL’s Credentials: - Bachelors of Physics - Harvard (1980) - Masters of Astronomy - University of Texas (1989) - P.hD. in Astrophysics - Columbia (1991) - Postdoctoral Research Associate - Princeton (1991-1994) - Staff Scientist - Hayden Planetarium (1994) - Visiting Research Scientist & Lecturer (Faculty) - Princeton (1994) - Director of The Planetarium (1996-2000) No Eric Weinstein, NGL IS A PHYSICIST; an Astrophysicist Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson

@ultrameticulous

4 ай бұрын

"...at a practicing level" is what he said. Essentially, he's a celebrity and too worried about his celebrity and image to go into unexplored territory. A fear of 'looking dumb' or 'crazy', he won't break any new ground. Instead he sits on Twitter and explains why something that happened in a movie wasn't physically accurate. Flexing degrees doesn't tell the story of a person. Eric gave him credit for intelligence. But he won't explore and advance the field.

@mrt445

4 ай бұрын

​@ultrameticulous when did he say he was worried about going into unexplored territory?? What are you even talking about. No one expects Tyson to be in some NASA lab doing some nerdy experiments. Discoveries are no longer done by individuals.

@ziggyfreud5357

2 ай бұрын

I can get a covert organisation to give me one of them background things too.

@mrt445

2 ай бұрын

@@ziggyfreud5357 "them background things"... You're clearly not even intelligent enough to do that.

@ziggyfreud5357

2 ай бұрын

@@mrt445 cheers 🍻 cobba 👍

“Cmon guys, let’s do some great science!!” “Ok, I’m in! “Now what?…..”

Neil DeGrasse Tyson would have been one of the many scientists to deny general relativity when it first came out. Neil is incredibly intelligent, but he’s a hardcore conformist. This prevents him from being unique, and creative.

@josephcoon5809

Жыл бұрын

Knowledgeable and Intelligent are two different things. You can know everything in a text book which makes you as knowledgeable as that text book. If you don’t understand how to apply that knowledge, you’re not very intelligent.

@roy8200

8 ай бұрын

@@josephcoon5809 Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Intelligence is knowing not to put it into a fruit salad.

@zatozatoichi7920

8 ай бұрын

@@roy8200 That's just preference.

@victorfergn

8 ай бұрын

Nah, you don't know how the GR model was created. Before of that you had the model of Special Relativity which solved MANY problems in physics (most of which were already proven to be truth) The thing was already in the air, so it was accepted easily. GR is a generalization of that, so Einstein's reputation was already established by the time he published his paper (there were more people trying to find that generalization) So... even conformist scientists accepted GR rather fast.

@Carvin0

8 ай бұрын

Not "incredibly intelligent". I would say "fairly intelligent". I know many, including myself, who are more intelligent.

Neil is the type of guy to wake you up at 3am to tell you that you sleep with your eyes closed.

@user-su6fy4pw2h

7 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@kendrum8902

7 ай бұрын

Lmaooo 😂

@aqualane1

7 ай бұрын

Affirmative action hire.

@michaelcalabrese5800

7 ай бұрын

Well, think about it! It’s counterintuitive. Why close your eyes when it’s already dark out? Is it the darkness that makes us sleep? Yes and no. Ever sleep on a nice afternoon under the sun. It’s not the darkness that causes us to sleep, it’s because you’re tired. Okay so what, does that have to with closing your eyes? Well, you’re tired so you don’t want to move your eyelid muscles. No. Eyelids are pretty light. You see, there was this guy in the nineteen eighties who figured this out and you wanna know why you close your eyes at night? Dust. He did one of those clock work orange machines on people and they all slept. Regular dreams like people always have. However, in the morning everyone had pain in their eyes and saw a bunch of little specks. You know how sometimes you see little specks in your eyes? Those are dead skin cells from your eyes. He figures out that those are the same thing, on they’re coming from the air around us. That’s what dust is! Dead skin! You close your eyes because of dead skin, Joe!

@Victor-qk7mw

7 ай бұрын

I'd love to see that animated by MeatCanyon lmao

Eric Weinstein saying anyone is not really a blank is pucking frecious 😂

NDT cant get enough of his own voice.

@timmyvawwter8898

Жыл бұрын

NDT is--as my late great mom used to say--a horse's A§§

@MrNH718

9 ай бұрын

​@@timmyvawwter8898and still he's 1000x smarter than you, some random loser on the Internet.

@watchmanonthewall14

8 ай бұрын

@@timmyvawwter8898 Bingo.

That’s why Tyson panics and gets aggressive whenever he’s challenged.

@wrongthinker843

7 ай бұрын

@@nateg.6187 Nah. But thanks for witlessly admitting he's mediocre.

@Bloink

7 ай бұрын

@@nateg.6187 What an embarrassing comment.

@54356776

7 ай бұрын

​@@nateg.6187 What evidence is there for your claims ?

@PuppetMasterdaath144

7 ай бұрын

Im just now doing what is called "scientific farts" okay, so everybody just calm the fc down.

@fernandocontreras1577

7 ай бұрын

​@@nateg.6187you just called him mediocre 😂

At least NDT doesn’t insist 1x1=2.

Thats why whenever I hear something like “majority scientists agree” it generally means it’s healthy to ignore it. Because that should almost never be the case

Just look at Neil talking about vaccines and you can tell he’s mentally stuck in his thinking

@watchmanonthewall14

8 ай бұрын

Bingo.

@davidnelson7719

8 ай бұрын

Hey look! Another replebeian hick!

@Arnsteel634

8 ай бұрын

He speaks the company line

@chethammer

8 ай бұрын

And you know more? You have a degree in Virology? Biology?

@brhodes0

8 ай бұрын

I have a medical degree and can confirm that Neil Tyson chats what we doctors refer to as "pure sh**e" when it comes to Virology.@@chethammer

-Neil deGrasse Tyson The Steven seagal of physics

@MrHeuvaladao

Жыл бұрын

lol 😂

@oldman_eleven

Жыл бұрын

💀

@waltershumer4211

Жыл бұрын

@Noxi29_RL 😂

@goofyfoot2001

Жыл бұрын

Mediocre junior highschool science teacher

@rikki-tikki-tavi2456

Жыл бұрын

Perfect description!

NGT is an educator, and he does a damn fine job of it. I’ve seen many physicists doing the research who have a hard time communicating to layman the basic principles of their work.

Geez, I am an irresponsible borderline quack. I should have gone into science.

@michaelnash9970

Жыл бұрын

Start small..... 🦐 in the basement.. Then ... (Who knows) 🤔 🐳

@davebritton7648

8 ай бұрын

We'll never know what we lost.

People really ought to stop saying things like "Dr. Tyson is to physics like what Seagal is to martial art." Neil is an actual Astrophysicist, who has written and co-written real, peer reviewed papers on Astrophysics. He's not practicing now, but he still has the degree, has written research, and works in a field where knowledge of Astrophysics is extremely relevant. Keep in mind, he's giving the explanations he does to lay-people, those who do not know practically anything about the field in which he is talking about. He's not going to give an explanation on Astrophysics at the Doctoral level, because he's not presenting this information to those who have Doctorates or going through a graduate program.

@insearchoftheperfectwatch934

8 ай бұрын

Excellent response!

@ShifuCareaga

8 ай бұрын

And Segall really once studied various martial arts... Then he invented Segalkido and made movies. 😂 As for Neil's physics papers I have not read those specifically. But the paradigms he has pushed have almost all turned out to be classified or quackery. Next.

@FTLGuillotine

8 ай бұрын

@@ShifuCareaga And are those paradigms you're referring to Astrophysics or Physics paradigms? Or irrelevant shit about gender politics or social issues? Every time I've seen Neil talk about physics it has been very accurate when accounting for the fact that he's talking to lay people.

@ShifuCareaga

8 ай бұрын

@@FTLGuillotine Astrophysics. I specifically do not have any tolerance for woke studies that wouldn't even be worth mentioning. I recommend you read up on the crisis in cosmology. Specifically you should know there are foundational issues in standard model cosmology and astrophysics... Numerous catastrophic failures in theories as well as empirical failures and obvious philosophical blips. People like Neil cover these issues up with a lot of fancy science talk and "teaching"... But if pressed into a corner he will admit the facts are flimsy and unsupportive of large amounts of claims. Some of the issues are so bad it is practically fraud they are taught let alone misattributed or misinformed to a willing, paying populace. Criminal.

@zoldlen883

8 ай бұрын

​@@FTLGuillotineYou need to get off yt for a while if you are actually defending that guy. He is so full of shit.

I thought I was the only person on earth that thought Tyson wasn’t as smart as everyone gave him credit for

Yay I love how the “alien” bodies are literally just ET lol

Degrasse is a jr. High school science teacher

@melissachartres3219

8 ай бұрын

At Degrassi Junior High?

@steven5054

8 ай бұрын

And Bret Weinstein still thinks he deserves a Nobel Prize lol

@TwilightxKnight13

8 ай бұрын

And yet you are still jealous of him

He's gravitated to teaching rather than doing. Nothing wrong with that. He's a good teacher.

@timmyvawwter8898

Жыл бұрын

If you can't 'do'... then teach.

@deeznutz8320

Жыл бұрын

Why does he 'teach' about shit he doesnt now about like vaccines?

@tylenolpainrelief6177

Жыл бұрын

He's not even a good teacher though

@peterpolesel4912

Жыл бұрын

He is a great teacher but teachers need to teach the status quo.

@tonyducks1121

Жыл бұрын

Except NDT is not even teaching at this point. He a celebrity "astrophysicist" pure and simple.

Bill Nye has entered the chat

@timothymendoza7798

Жыл бұрын

Wasn't he on a spectrum?

@noobovsky420

Жыл бұрын

@@timothymendoza7798 bill bye. The liberal guy. Bill bill bill bill bill

@vornamenachname594

Жыл бұрын

Bill Nye 72 genders guy

@69hunter55

Жыл бұрын

​@@vornamenachname594😨😫🤮

@danielvandermerwe7921

Жыл бұрын

Bill nye is the worst. He has no idea what he’s talking about. Is a politician who’s gotten all his statements refuted over the years. I enjoyed watching his stuff when I was 5 though. But he’s lost his mind lately.

Celebrity scientists are celebrities first.

Timothy Nguyen, whose PhD thesis intersects with Weinstein's work said what Weinstein has presented so far has had "no visible impact" and "gaps, both mathematical and physical in origin" that "jeopardize Geometric Unity as a well-defined theory, much less one that is a candidate for a theory of everything."

@jastrckl

4 ай бұрын

My money for a TOE goes to Wolfram, the way that his generative algorithm combined with graph theory leads to the duality of quantum physics is very elegant.

Neil DeGrasse Tyson is the kind of guy who wakes you up to ask if you were sleeping.

@coldasalaskaonahoe3134

Жыл бұрын

I love listening to NGT. I dont know why this comment has me laughing forever. I guess because I can envision it.😂😂😂

@daughtermoreau

Жыл бұрын

I don't really understand why this made me laugh so insanely much

@tcorourke2007

Жыл бұрын

@coldasalaskaonahoe3134 I can't stand him, but I appreciate your sense od humor.

@tcorourke2007

Жыл бұрын

@rookiegirl5757 The more popular version is "wakes his family up to tell them he's going to sleep." After careful consideration, I do think that's more applicable to his discourse and, therefore, funnier.

@jackwhite7736

Жыл бұрын

You're the Carlos Mencia of KZread comments

Neil deGrasse Tyson is as much as an astrophysicist as Dr. Phil is an actual doctor

@alphasuperior100

9 ай бұрын

Good one, I understand a little what you wrote can you elaborate?

@FTLGuillotine

8 ай бұрын

Neil is indeed an Astrophysicist, he's not like Dr. Phil in the sense that Dr. Phil's show gives him the moniker Dr. despite him not being a medical doctor, Neil is a real Astrophysicist who has performed Astrophysics research. Even so, Dr. Phil does indeed have a doctorate in clinical psychology. He's not a medical doctor, but he's certainly no stranger to the medical field.

@Jacious

8 ай бұрын

Gene Simmons says "call me Doctor Love".

@apr2031

8 ай бұрын

both literally are those things, so yes 😂 glad you were able to work that one out all by urself

@flamingmuffin666

8 ай бұрын

@@alphasuperior100 Neil has a PhD in astrophysics, he climbed up the ladder, and then just sat there, his ability to communicate science is what maintains his position, and not his ability to perform as a scientist. Dr. Phil has a PhD in Clinical Psychology and he used to be a board certified clinical psychologist, he was on top of the practice, but then his show became dominant and he never renewed his license to practice. He doesn't operate as a clinical psychologist, because he legally can't (you need the license to diagnose), but his show is about communicating from a clinical psychology perspective. Neither really practice their education at a doctorate level, instead they just communicate from their background, with a concern for being entertaining.

Creep discusses creep, creepy.

He is not a physicist. He is an educator on physics.

Eric is a master at wrapping up simple thoughts in complicated language.

@willek1335

8 ай бұрын

Complicated language can be more precise, though point taken. ;)

@okthennone

8 ай бұрын

He likes to hear himself speak.

@loveandlimelight

8 ай бұрын

sometimes that is the case, sometimes he wraps up intermediate thoughts in complicated language too

@balkloth

8 ай бұрын

What great science did eric do exactly? Oh he was a hedge fund director for peter thiel?

@jeffreyjustis5338

8 ай бұрын

@@balklothI get what you're saying but you have to be pretty smart to run a hedge fund.

NDT: the man who made Carl Sagan look humble.

@agnosticmanquestionsall2409

Жыл бұрын

😂 Carl Sagan was awesome IMO I don't remember him being as obnoxious as NDT or even arrogant at all but maybe I only watched him narrate and not his real self.

@gluonone

8 ай бұрын

I met Sagan once and he came off as the most arrogant person I've ever met..total jerk.

"He can't think" ok Calvin Candie.

NTD is a regular 12th grade level science teacher

I just listened to a Startalk that NDT was asked what he be doing if he wasn’t an astrophysicist. And he said that would still be a astrophysicist but one who spent all his time in a lab. He is self aware that he has a special talent for teaching and getting people interested in science, more so than just being a great physicist.

@PETERJOHN101

7 ай бұрын

He's not a great physicist, and his demeanor spoils whatever sharing skills he might have once had.

Neil is a highschool astrophysicist teacher at best.

@beatonthedonis

8 ай бұрын

DeGrasse Tyson taught astrophysics at university level and researched it at post-doc level. You're a clown who doesn't know what they're talking about.

@TwilightxKnight13

8 ай бұрын

And you are the next assistant manager at McD's, at best

@glengrimm4075

6 ай бұрын

@TwilightxKnight13 Obviously, you can't tell the difference between education and true intelligence, Neil has been educating himself for many, many years, yet true still remains elusive to the poor old bugger. If you had any intelligent's you'd know this and refrain from such Neanderthal statements. 🤣 🤣 🤣

@glengrimm4075

3 ай бұрын

@TwilightxKnight13 Well, at least I can actually spell MacDonalds, and if you even had half a brain, you would realise I'm right. Having an education and being intelligent Are two totally different things. And by the sounds of it you lack both. 🤣

The scientific establishment is tripping on Terrence Howard’s theory. Two hours and 20 minutes into the podcast. You can see the truth. Start to come out. Howards out there, but I think he’s onto something. That’s really pissing these guys off.

I love when they act like Joe Biden is a communist

"by the way...!" (Neil interrupts the conversation)

I can’t stand NDT anymore, he gets in the way of breakthrough science because it’s easier to dismiss hypothesis than to do your own work

@marcalesander2417

Жыл бұрын

Oh stop it! He is no one to stop anything!! Don’t make shit up! He is an affirmative action scientist who will never give ANY REAL science to modern physics! He knows this and now you know it!!!!!please!

@wyldeyouth

Жыл бұрын

Maybe you watched too much of him? Maybe cut back on the Internet thing for a while?

@lewisjbh

Жыл бұрын

Yea he once said phylosophy is a waste of time to study......that science had all the major ideas locked in

@agert6416

Жыл бұрын

@@wyldeyouth cool idea bro

@granadosvm

Жыл бұрын

That he gets in the way of anything is ridiculous. He is not involved in any research, budget approval, regulation or any other influence in science. He is an educator and a communicator. He learns and he shares. This comment makes me feel you think YT comments are real scientific research.

Great "mmmm" from Joe there, just needs an "adult baby" to really round it out perfectly

LMAO NO WAY. this reel was followed by terrence Howard's 1x1 explanation xD

His arrogance has caused me to dislike anything to do with him.

@hxhdfjifzirstc894

7 ай бұрын

Eh, he's just not that smart -- nobody needs to know his opinion on anything.

@macicoinc9363

7 ай бұрын

​@@hxhdfjifzirstc894They shouldn't care anyways. This idea that linguists, physicists, or scientists in general have any authority on matters outside their field or neighboring fields is nonsense and just modern idolatry filling the hole left by religion. Philosophers themselves have no actual authority or related experience to topics such as politics. Neither do "political scientists/philosophers", ironically. I'd trust the average person's opinion much more on commentary and proposed solutions to every day problems than some isolated academic. I also guarantee you, if you ran a study comparing the effectiveness of certain groups at making meaningful improvements to general society through governing, the condition that someone has attained a higher educational degree at best shows no correlation, and likely correlates highly negatively. This should be intuitive due to this condition correlating to an extreme divergence in lifestyle and experiences from the common person. The Soviet Union is what you get when scholars and scientists attempt to form a new governmental system from scratch. A broken, overly idealistic, and poorly executed set of fundamental ideas for a society, dressed up as a utopia, that isn't efficient at doing anything important to the common man but, obviously, extremely efficient at academic pursuits, which inevitably descends into authoritarian autocracy the moment the people realize that their smart leaders will never prioritize anything but their own interests. The irony of the Soviet Union proclaiming itself as a "government of the workers", is likely the greatest in all of history. There were many founding fathers that were scholars, but their ranks were filled primarily by somewhat intellectually homely people. The ratios of these groups helped renormalize and transform the academic's idealistic fantasies into effective governmental systems for the general populace, at least to a more sufficient extent than the other systems of the time. Even then, some detrimental idealisms still made it through the filter, and it took literal centuries for them to be removed. With their existence and uprooting nearly always causing mass upheaval and suffering in the common man's life. The best example of this includes such wonderful ideas as slavery (yes, this was primarily supported and practiced by the rich intellectuals like Jefferson), which caused the bloodiest conflict in the nation's history. Remember, even Lincoln, a highly educated Lawyer, didn't want to free the slaves because he thought they were equal, he wanted to free them because he saw the existence of slavery as incompatible with the ideas and future of America. He expressed several times that he thought blacks could not exist in American society, and that it would be necessary to relocate them back to Africa.

@CrackedCandy

7 ай бұрын

Plagiarist

@Lutherson1962

7 ай бұрын

Oh the irony there feckboy

@PuppetMasterdaath144

7 ай бұрын

I dont think it helps you to say he willfully ignorant or something akin to a easy to fix human flaw of arrogance, the guy is a stereotypical savant genius with less processing dedicated to mastrubation

Neil is a paid *ACTOR* like Bill Nye. Nuff Said.

@Carvin0

8 ай бұрын

I have a very, very low opinion of DeGrasse-Tyson, and a much lower opinion of Nye.

@chaospet

8 ай бұрын

He’s not. He’s an actual astrophysicist. He has the education, he’s done the work, he’s published well respected peer reviewed research. You have been brainwashed if you don’t know this.

@fredmercury1314

8 ай бұрын

@@chaospet Recently? Has he published recently? And what was it that was published? Is it modern, relevant, and groundbreaking, or just a mundane statistical analysis of someone else's work? What has he created? What has he discovered? Educate me, please.

Degrasi is an expositionist first and a teacher second

Neil is a great science communicator, so what if he hasn't done groundbreaking research. Trying to discredit him this way as a way to discredit his scientific opinions on matters is wrong. Neil amplifies the scientific consensus, which is dictated by groundbreaking research and thousands of more reputable researchers than Weinstein.

@barobaro1

2 ай бұрын

Weisntein never tried to discredit Neil's scientific expertise in this clip. He was just trying to explain the differences between a science communicator and a scientific researcher and he is right, those two are very different things and very few people can be both at once (at a high level). Pls stop being so insecure and emotionally attached to a multimillionaire who doesn't even know you exist. Take your emotions and biases out of it and watch this clip again from a level headed and rational point of view, you would very soon realize that at no point in the video weinstein is actually disrespecting neil. what he's saying is just basic common sense and I'm sure even neil himself would agree with weinstein on this. The fact that you got so triggered and offended by something so obvious and simple is honestly so sad and pathetic. pls look at yourself in the mirror and realize your wrongs before it's too late because people like you who are so emotionally attached when viewing and discussing an intellectual topic are the most susceptible ones to going down the conspiracy/unscientific thinking route. I'd recommend you to go to a therapist in order to address this because alot of deep insecurity issues might be the root cause of this kinda behavior.

@cameronmar1

2 ай бұрын

At no point in this clip was Eric disrespecting or discrediting Neil, wtf are you talking about? are you okay in the head?

Sir, this is a Wendy's

@SusnataSeal

4 ай бұрын

you look like a wendy eater

Neil has mastered the art of impressing people who don't understand what he's saying. Neil is also quite impressed with himself.

@Pteromandias

8 ай бұрын

Neil DeGrasse Tyson is the Michael Eric Dyson of science.

@barktwid

8 ай бұрын

Well put.

@imemberberry

8 ай бұрын

I get that Neil is a quack, but Cosmos is still my shit.

@andrewjenkinson8948

8 ай бұрын

So much like Eric Weinstein, then.

@beantea5592

8 ай бұрын

​@andrewjenkinson8948 Probobly. All these guys are sniveling little morons who know a lot of jargon. People bow down because they have the lab coat and credentials but in reality their intrest in science is mostly just about ego stroking over the scientists title and wanting to be the smartest guy in the room. That's why they're always sh!tting on eachother over highly theoretical topics that in reality have no affect on anyone's day to day life.

Even if he’s everything everyone is saying, Neil’s job is to make science and astrophysics exciting. He’s a great PR front man and does a friggen great job of it! He stays in his lane because he does it well. He does astrophysics well enough to be able to communicate what it’s accomplishing in everyday life. That’s it.

Education does not equate to intelligence. And knowledge does not equate to wisdom. Neil is a perfect example of that. Hes good at remembering things others have already found. That's his strongest attribute that he has.

My takeaway from this interview was his attitude of "I'm the man with all the answers." His argument was a challenge to the status quo, but don't mistake that for being correct or absolute.

Science always questions and is never settled.

@josephcoon5809

Жыл бұрын

Try telling that to a climate alarmist or Covidian…

@piggyslayer1999

Жыл бұрын

​@@josephcoon5809 for real😂 how many times did we hear on the news "the science is settled"

@josephcoon5809

Жыл бұрын

@@piggyslayer1999 What’s worse, when I argued with the zealots who regurgitated that line, they would send me academic papers that used words like “suggests” and “leads us to believe” in the summaries. Religion is never the problem. Zealotry is the problem, and religion isn’t the only ideology that has mindless zealots.

@merleshand2442

Жыл бұрын

Until money enters the equation

@Spencerwalker21

Жыл бұрын

​@@merleshand2442yeah and the money is with the oil lobbyist

Neil is a physicist and helping people understand the history It doesn't change the fact that there are some quack physicists out there still experimenting and doing sometimes brilliant sometimes observed things. There's a little bit of racism happening because Neil is black popular wealthy and some people are hating

That is the NICEST insult I have ever heard. Quack. 🦆

Neil does not care for any one but himself. He loves to hear himself Speak. And he enjoys belittling others.

@justinw1765

8 ай бұрын

Can't say for certain, but I would not be surprised if he was, or could be, diagnosed as being on the narcissistic personality disorder spectrum.

Eric Weinstein needs to get rid of those bumps on his face.

Talking about extreme jealousy. This guy is extremely jealous of Dr. Niel DeGrasse Tyson PhD. Sounds extremely racist against Niel DeGrasse Tyson.

@jelink22

3 ай бұрын

"This guy" is worth 100 million dollars. He's not even remotely "jealous" of NDT. YOU are the only one bringing up racism---how frickin LAME.

Wow! What gall!!!! As a former physicist who left academia to become an investor with much less research projects than Dr. Tyson, Dr. Weinstein does not have the credibility to criticize Dr. Tyson. If anything, Eric Weinstein is the one acting as if he knows more physics than Isaac Newton.

Tyson is a marketer in a lab coat. That's it!!!!

@iandevine3063

Жыл бұрын

I feel like trying to market the things he talks about is definitely not a bad thing though.

@deeznutz8320

Жыл бұрын

​@@iandevine3063 Like getting the heart attack shot? Yeah great 😂

@MrNH718

9 ай бұрын

Let's compare your academic credentials vs his, then you can say that stupid comment.

@Dave_of_Mordor

8 ай бұрын

@@MrNH718 That's the crazy part. These guys don't even have the fundamental knowledge of the thing they're criticizing Neil for, yet they're attacking him because they thought this short was about Weinstein dissing Neil

@jackiemoon1556

8 ай бұрын

He's a sophist, not a very good one either.

Dude … He surely practiced physics in his lifetime. Having said that I hate to agree with Eric Weinstein about anything but he makes a compelling point here … If fact it may well be the most coherent thought Mr Weinstein has ever experienced.

One of the best things about the scientific method is that any “irresponsibility” within any research usually has to go through a peer review process, which usually checks down irresponsibilities, or any flaws that may be happening within any research. Neil may not be a great physician/scientist in terms of introducing new ideas or “being irresponsible”, but he is great at communicating and promoting those ideas by making them more accessible to the rest of us instead of claiming bogus conspiracies

If you want something complicated explained to you in an intelligent, articulate manner, ask Neil. If you want a long winded, confusing, self-indulgent explanation that makes no sense to no one but Eric Weinstein, ask Eric.

@user-ui2mk2no1f

15 күн бұрын

The problem with Neil is that he doesn´t stay in his lane. The other day he was comenting on CICO and got it all wrong. Dr Bart Kay, put him back in his lane. See Dr Bart Kay.

Keynes was the biggest collector of original Issac Newton works in his time. He said of Newton that he was both he first scientist and the last mystic.