Very thrilling. Every parent should make their children listen to this.

Its clear the kauravas were sort of forced into this situation. Imagine having a bleak future & no throne back in that time along with a bully cousin whom apparently nobody tried to stop? Why did the elders here not say anything? This certainly proves how one can't take a side in Mahabharata since no one is actually pure or righteous here. Would the poisoning really happen if bheema wasn't left to openly bully?

Great effort! Love the rendering. Thank you.

Thankyou for this amazing narration

bheem is a bully 😢

❤

❤❤

The pandavas were highly intelligent and righteous. They upheld Dharma so I don't understand why the narrator would say that they ate meat and fish. This is a misrepresentation of the pandavas.

@namanwalia5773

8 ай бұрын

It's in the texts After war dhridharstra was invited by Pandavs for dinner there Bheem while eating meat crunched on bone and laughed and mocked him saying this was the sound made when I broke your son's bones.

@Akshayagayatri

5 ай бұрын

Why? lord rama is righteous too and he ate deer meat when he was in exile?

@ganeshmungal3251

5 ай бұрын

@@Akshayagayatri. Really. Explain?. How do you know that?. Let's hear your explanation.

@Akshayagayatri

5 ай бұрын

@@ganeshmungal3251 When maa sita requested rama for the golden deer she didn't want it as a pet. she wanted it's skin as a decoration to the palace in ayodhya. that is clearly mentioned in the original valmiki ramayan here i have mentioned the source of rama eating deer meat Else, if that best deer does not come into your capture while alive, oh tigerly-man, at the least its gorgeous deerskin will be remnant of it. Aranya kanda section 43 verse 19 “Famished (बुभुक्षितौ / bubhukshitau) they (Ram and Lakshman) there, then, (तौ तत्र /tau yatra) killed/hunted (हत्वा /hatvā) four species of large animals (चतुरो महामृगान् /chaturo mahāmrigān): wild boar (वराह /varaha ), white-footed antelope (मृश्यं/mrishyam), spotted deer (पृषतं /prishatam) and the great stag with black stripes (महारुरुम् /maharurum); ate (आदाय /adaya) the meat ( मेध्यं/medhyam) quickly (त्वरितं?tvaritam) and rested underneath a tree ( वासाय /vasaya…ययतुर्वनस्पतिम् / yayaturvanaspatim) in the evening time (काले/kālē).” (ayodhya kanda section 52 verse 102) If this isn't enough proof then I don't know what is

@Akshayagayatri

5 ай бұрын

@@ganeshmungal3251 just incase you misunderstood dharma does not mean following a set a rules given by some priest. dharma is following one's duties without bad intentions. the dharma of a hunter is to hunt animals and just because he hunts/ kills animals doesn't make him a sinner. he is just following his dharma. and pandavas were princes nevertheless so they ought to eat meat just like any other royal family