Episode 300 - The 10 Greatest Byzantine Emperors

For our 300th episode I decided to do something different. I chose my 10 greatest Byzantine Emperors.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy (acast.com/privacy) for more information.

Пікірлер: 24

  • @markb8426
    @markb842615 сағат бұрын

    Love the content

  • @olefredrikskjegstad5972
    @olefredrikskjegstad59726 күн бұрын

    A very interesting list, with a number of interesting people on it.

  • @wasneeplus
    @wasneeplus6 күн бұрын

    Personally, I've always had a soft spot for John II Komnenos. While you could argue he had it easy, since he inherited a stable empire from his father, he is just such an admirable figure in every way.

  • @chriskw4362

    @chriskw4362

    5 күн бұрын

    I wouldn’t say stable at all. Asia Minor on the map was under Roman control in reality the whole thing could collapse in an instant. He was methodical and careful. But yeah one of the top for sure.

  • @teblesz5783
    @teblesz57836 күн бұрын

    I must say with the criteria stated the list just fits. also the choice of time period to judge emprors from being the 'hegemony of Constantinople' fits very well with the concept of greatest byzantine emperors. nice on both of those fronts

  • @dominickwong3002
    @dominickwong30024 күн бұрын

    I like your no 1 and no 8. Quietly competent emperors should get more credit

  • @v4enthusiast541
    @v4enthusiast5415 күн бұрын

    Nice to have some Nikephorous Phokas representation on there

  • @Modulates
    @Modulates6 күн бұрын

    Listened to it on Spotify already (with my walk). However, since I cannot be bothered to write an email at the moment (this will be changed in the next few days). I would like to start by saying, I love the post-amble. I also got really scared I missed some content, when you said after the narrative. Additionally, the list is truly good. I definitely think it's a surprise, and definitely a realistic list. I like that you added Heraclius. I'll do a top 10 Byzantine Emperoers (up to 1204) and then a post period when the narrative is fully complete. I will probably also do another "all roman emperorers" list at some point. (Spoiler, Augustus will take the top of that list, due to bias, but also due to the ability to become an emperor as well as the political talent and the war know-how, along with Agrippa). I'm starting around 457 A.D (to keep within the byzantine podcast period) Anywho, thanks as always, a phenominal episode Robin, thank you for all that you do. 10. Phokas 9. Anastasius I 8. Constantine VII 7. Tzimiskes 6. Basil I 5. Romanos I 4. Alexios I 3. Leo III 2. Manuel I 1. Basil II (who's surprised)

  • @Onezy05
    @Onezy056 күн бұрын

    I really enjoyed your list! Some interesting choices, and I can completely understand the argument for Anastasius being number 1. Such a capable administrator. I also quite liked how you limited the emperors from 476 till 1204. I personally prefer to rank the emperors all the way from 330 to 1453 (spoiler: Constantine I is the best imo) but I thought I'd try and copy you and limit my own top 10 to your specified timeframe:: 10) Justinian I (just about) 9) Basil I 8) Manuel Komnenos 7) John Tzimiskes 6) Alexios Komnenos 5) Basil II 4) Leo III 3) John II Komnenos 2) Anastasius 1) Constantine V

  • @hexitg9817
    @hexitg98176 күн бұрын

    What a great episode. Really liked your list! You should someday do top 10 most interesting emperors. I feel like people want to see Justinian on this list just because he is a really interesting character. Thank you Robin for making in my opinion the best history podcast out there

  • @Onezy05

    @Onezy05

    6 күн бұрын

    Yes, lots of people seem to conflate interesting with good when assessing an emperor. I think Justinian's interesting, but then I also think Justinian II and Andronikos Komnenos are too. And they were far from good emperors lol

  • @tylerellis9097
    @tylerellis90976 күн бұрын

    I’m something of a Isaac Angelos enjoyer myself

  • @sotirismitzolis5171
    @sotirismitzolis51716 күн бұрын

    ΥΕΑΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗΗ ΒΑΒΥΥΥΥΥΥΥΥΥΥΥ WE HAVE BEEEN WAITING FOR THIS SINCE EPISODE 1a

  • @avemnevoiesideiarba
    @avemnevoiesideiarba6 күн бұрын

    Omg no Justinian?? Or Manuel K? Very sad 😢

  • @hexitg9817
    @hexitg98176 күн бұрын

    Cant wait to listen to this!

  • @ilijas3041
    @ilijas30414 күн бұрын

    I would add that job performance must be also seen relative to the circumstances. Basil 2 had only his power play with magnates to handle, while Leo 3 had Maslama ante portam from day 1, Manuel had new world order and non-state which could only be held together by the emperors personal excellence, no institutions or widely adopted social contract in place whatsoever. So our Basil 2 could prolong his suffocating of Samuils state piece by piece forever, never be decisive, and always save some work for the next year to conveniently place him out of the vipers nest and always by his army. Question for Robin, and all of you who made your lists: How many of those on the list would have appeared on the SPQR goat list? Top 10 from Cleopatras deathbed to Dandolos swan song. No need to add pre-Christian ones, just how many of our boys would have made it?

  • @TheHistoryofByzantiumPodcast

    @TheHistoryofByzantiumPodcast

    Күн бұрын

    Caveats: I haven't studied that earlier period and it probably isn't very fair to compare different eras. But I would guess that Augustus, Hadrian, Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, Aurelian, Diocletian and Constantine would probably all be on a Top 10 list. Which only leaves room for 3 others :-(

  • @Zenocrat
    @Zenocrat3 күн бұрын

    Justinian was one of the greatest rulers in human history ... I think he qualifies to crack the more narrow "The 10 Greatest Byzantine Emperors". Not quite like leaving Jesus and Muhammad off the list of the top 10 most influential religious leaders, but close.

  • @christospanagopoulos5821
    @christospanagopoulos58216 күн бұрын

    Very interesting ranking. But even you have the prosopography of justinian although not include him in the list. Justinian was not the best character in history, but for sure is in the top ten Byzantine emperors if not number 1. The plagues and the dark years from the volcanic eruptions were not on his side other wise the course of history might be very different and now the people of spania might speaking Greek. Nice job though. Cheers!

  • @drauke
    @drauke6 күн бұрын

    Justinian is not on the list?!? 😢

  • @giannisgiannopoulos791
    @giannisgiannopoulos7916 күн бұрын

    The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine) may have "started " in 330 with the inauguration of Constantinople ( Byzantion), but as a matter of fact was already running since 284 after Diocletian's partition. 476 is a wrong narrative since the West, a great deal of it, was recovered by Justinian I some 60 years later. Odoacer and Theodoric were under the higher authority of the (Eastern) Roman Emperor in Constantinople and they were serving as Regents, not independent Kings. When they decided to act in an anti-Roman manner and independently, were eliminated. 1. Basil II 2. Justinian I 3.Heraclius (heretical) 4. John II 5.. Alexios I 6. Anastasius I (heretical) 7. John I 8. Nikephoros II 9. Leo III (heretical) 10. Constantine V (heretical)

  • @Onezy05

    @Onezy05

    5 күн бұрын

    Very good explanation and list, but you misspelled 'based' as 'heretical'

  • @giannisgiannopoulos791

    @giannisgiannopoulos791

    5 күн бұрын

    @@Onezy05 thanks. Corrected.