thanks for the shoutout TOOOOOMMMM BOOOOXXXX

The tenpai one is honestly fantastic, and peak meme material.

Konami needs to makes more decks like marincess or madolche, one card combos that lock you early into something. Both decks have soft negation meaning they don’t destroy the card. Its super healthy interaction

@jumpiestaman100

28 күн бұрын

Archetype or type lock is kind of fine, though the latter less so than the former (because dragon link lol). As long as the lock isn’t something like Exosisters.

@Jaganphotos

28 күн бұрын

@@jumpiestaman100 imo Xeno-locking (like with exosisters) is perfectly fine except when every other deck doesn’t do it. Same for type, attribute and ED locking - it’s why I hated Tearlaments as a Despia player lol

@jumpiestaman100

27 күн бұрын

@@Jaganphotos Yeah but Xeno locking would be fine, if they made all decks able to play through some amount of interaction. Exosister Martha lock is the worst kind in the game. And they already die to 1 handtrap in general. If konami just made the Xeno-locks while also making them a bit durable, that’d make the game at least slightly better

Honorable mention to Light and Darkness Dragon Lord in Branded, they just set Banishment to perform the full combo with it as a bonus while Lost protects them from the mandatory effect. You can chain link 3 for your Puppet if needed. I love the interactions it creates because if it survives it will chainblock your every move, but if it's run over you can revive Albaz in damage step to get a fusion that's very hard to counter

TomBox: The Extra Deck is super tight Me: Hahaha no it isn't. It fits perfectly.

I like that every endboard is tons of cards that make them basically impossible to break through most the time, with numerous cards on the field and in the GY. And then there’s Tenpai with just Seals pass.

Imagine if the fiendsmith was locked behind a qcr 😂

I'd like to see how to make that chimera end board

I LOVE this video. Showcasing how crazy the endboards can be due to fiendsmith is going to be very helpful to a lot of players. At the same time, shows that gy interaction is going to become super important next format in order to disrupt the fiendsmith plays.

6th card “Maxx “C”” syndrome hit a little too hard

Early unboxing videos when?

Predection: the winner of the nawcq main decks winter cherries

@tuavaresm

28 күн бұрын

😂

@alexanderbatterbee8369

28 күн бұрын

Nobody even played it in tear format so I doubt it

@Chackothewacko

28 күн бұрын

Fat chance I had my kitkallos cherries a few times and i still won.

@apoocumber4164

28 күн бұрын

Never happening. Its only good opening turn 1 while u go second. And for it to be viable you have to dedicate extra deck spots to it. The extra decks are way way too tight for nearly all decks

@LemonCookies

28 күн бұрын

Everytime i cherries a bident dragon/black rose i won lol.

So you didn't say anything about Beatrice so confirmed banned??

@e-tan3911

28 күн бұрын

God I hope so. That card needed to die yesterday. Though knowing Konami, it won't happen since they want extra fiendsmith bucks, as if the engine wasn't gonna sell like hotcakes even with a Beatrice ban.

Is it worth playing shifter in a deck that wants the GY if your opponent suffers from shifter more?

@jonathanculbreth1618

28 күн бұрын

i doubt it, though it highly depends on your deck and the matchup.

@troll2504

28 күн бұрын

@@jonathanculbreth1618no lol

@Nob911

27 күн бұрын

Yes

@amr3731

15 күн бұрын

Only if your deck can play around it to certain extent. Otherwise u better off just play a shifter deck.

Ok, im dumb, how can you make Hope Harbinger with the Fiendsmith package?

@amr3731

15 күн бұрын

The video puts into consideration that u might play the snake eyes ver, which u can summon it by overlaying mons like flamberge and se diabelstar

he knew and didn't say smh

Love the content. D shifter is a necessary Evil that we goin to need from now on.

@__senjutsu

28 күн бұрын

I've always said Shifter wasn't really an issue. It's the decks that can play them WELL.

@YGOandMasterDuel

28 күн бұрын

I agreed. D shifter is not the problem. Shifter makes the game balance and I love the card.

@matthewpetrela6262

28 күн бұрын

I dropped shifter on some pro player at a locals and he got very upset, not everyone would agree with the sentiment (he was playing kashtira/snake eyes ofc)

@__senjutsu

28 күн бұрын

@matthewpetrela6262 lmao, then he has no right to complain. I play Kash and can play through shifter no problem. What a p*ssy

@Raminator243

28 күн бұрын

@@matthewpetrela6262the guy was probably more upset at his own hand than anything. A single copy of Snake Eyes Ash puts up 3-4 Apo negates + follow up under shifter

God, this format is going to suck

Mulcharmy is gonna be way better in ROTA format

@Nob911

27 күн бұрын

Nah it's ass

Tenpai:

(Sorry this isnt relevent to the video was hoping someone here might have some clarity for me) I have a ruling that has recently become prevalent it feels everyone (myself included) is arguing on how it should be ruled. The card in question is Revealer Of The Ice Barrier which has the following text: While you control another "Ice Barrier" monster, your opponent cannot Tribute Summon. You can only use each of the following effects of "Revealer of the Ice Barrier" once per turn. You can discard 1 card; Special Summon 1 "Ice Barrier" Tuner from your Deck, also you cannot Special Summon monsters for the rest of this turn, except WATER monsters. If you would discard, or send a card(s) from your hand to the GY, to activate an "Ice Barrier" monster's effect, you can banish this card from your GY instead of 1 of those cards. The situation is Player A has a Revealer of the Ice Barrier on the field with another copy in the grave and NO cards in hand. They attempt to activate the effect. And they banish the Revealer in the grave to pay the cost. My question is, is this a legal activation because they do not have a card to discard at the point they attempt to activate the card and pay the cost despite not paying it regardless. The examples people have given by the community is Guiding Ariadne, which I personally and many others disagree with because it is a continuously applied effect on the field and also not a replacement effect, it just dismisses the need to pay. The only cards I can find that should be references I also cannot find any official rulings on it which is Ursarctic Departure and Ursarctic Drytron which both have the following text on them: If you would Tribute a monster(s) to activate an "Ursarctic" or "Drytron" monster's effect, you can banish this card from your GY instead. You can only use this effect of "Ursarctic Drytron" once per turn. The ruling in question here would be for multiple of the main deck monsters that all share this line of text: During the Main Phase (Quick Effect): You can Tribute 1 other Level 7 or higher monster from your hand; Special Summon this card from your hand, also you cannot Special Summon for the rest of this turn, except monsters with a Level. So I guess the question that people don't know the answer to is: Can you activate a card with a cost, when unable to pay the cost if you have a replacement effect that is not a continuously applied effect such as Lair Of Darkness.

I’ve been saying exosister is about to become more relevant than ever. No deck can shut down the GY better than those nuns. Two turns of shifter and then they can just turn it off completely is crazy

@crosshair4483

28 күн бұрын

Ash on Martha gg?

@xmoonbunny_

28 күн бұрын

@@crosshair4483 ash doesnt hurt 😭 there’s many ways to go around that

@brasil2907

28 күн бұрын

Nib is the issue

@xmoonbunny_

28 күн бұрын

@@brasil2907 pretty much. The deck can play through HT’s. Nib is an issue but they can negate with carpidivem or play under it and finish the combo on opponents turn

And this right here is what got magic in trouble by giving "pro-players" insider knowledge prior to major events, So if tom does well at NACQ its arguable that's only because he had a month or more of being able to test or even financially gain off the insider information,

@KokujinHibiki19

28 күн бұрын

But here is the thing, he isn't competing in the event, he is on commentary so your argument is moot.

@ricecHrispies007

28 күн бұрын

He doesn't play in competitive events. It is still sketchy with his friends but commentators need to have time to become knowledgeable about the upcoming cards and combos if we want good coverage. Tom is usually one of the only commentators that actually knows what is happening gameplay wise.

DIES IRAE, MY GOD

@crosshair4483

28 күн бұрын

Yugitubers reading card names correctly challenge impossible

@MSTTV

28 күн бұрын

​@@crosshair4483 Pretty sure I'm Correct. In fact, I'm 100% I'm correct.

@MSTTV

28 күн бұрын

Pretty sure its not Dies Irae. That just some poor translation. Like when Sprights were Splights. Or when Multchummy are now Mulcharmy.

@crosshair4483

28 күн бұрын

@MSTTV entirely possible that the tcg name will be different, but Dies Irae is an old Latin phrase with a well established pronunciation. Mozart's and Verdi's requiems got it right. But that's all from me, thanks for indulging my one daily nerdge moment :)

Nerfing Link Monsters is truly the only way to fix the game.

The format will be ass

master rule 6 and full reset is the only way yugioh can be fixed at this point

Advance is dead :(