She did warn them... "I, too, can command the wind, Sir!"

@Andysaid420

3 ай бұрын

And with grace, she's 1st

@andreclayton5578

14 күн бұрын

It was the devil who commanded the wind for her.

England's greatest weapon throughout history: English weather.

@helgathegreat

Жыл бұрын

I DIED AT THIS 🤣😂

@GranSinderesis

Жыл бұрын

@Boleyns Just lucky bad weather... remember contrarmada and Cartagena de Indias biggest defeat on naval history of the world.

@dab0331

Жыл бұрын

@Boleyns Spain defeated England in the 2nd Armada which was initiated by England. No ships were outright sunk by England in this one. In the 2nd Armada Spain devastated several of England's ships

@samanthasmith61

Жыл бұрын

@@GranSinderesis this is where everything went downhill for every thing spanish.. and the rise of the English! now you jumping border to english America help

@felipedeanjou1804

Жыл бұрын

@@dab0331 falsoooo

Say what you will about the story, but one thing's for sure: visually, this movie looked even more beautiful than the first film.

@BeelySalasBlair-uy5wn

11 ай бұрын

It's stunning to watch.

@AtlasBlizzard

10 ай бұрын

I can't believe its only Oscar nomination was, albeit very deservedly, for Cate Blanchett's performance. But the cinematography was stunning, it deserved a nomination for that.

@itsstans75

9 ай бұрын

there is a first film?

@MinhLe-zo3ij

9 ай бұрын

@@itsstans75 yes, Elizabeth (1998), the young Elizabeth was played by Cate, too

@NodDisciple1

7 ай бұрын

First Film?

To think people complain about the weather constantly when it was the weather that was partly responsible in fending off the attack from Spain.

@thedrinkinggamemaker9749

2 жыл бұрын

Fine, we'll never complain again

@VersusARCH

Жыл бұрын

"partly"

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

I'll never ever complain ever again.

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

Until I really want to.

@sandymyers3148

Жыл бұрын

this are the lawyers like king philip trying to destroy Elizabeth look what happened God protect!

This whole scene is so unbelievably majestic.

@danjones9704

Жыл бұрын

It’s also entirely historically inaccurate. Philip was succeeded by his son after his death. He did not abdicate the throne.

@bootorcaesar

4 ай бұрын

@@danjones9704 Yes. It is. Which is what ruins the movie, because when you've researched this stuff you're cringing at it. For such a movie, it's a shame they couldn't at least write it so it was f**king accurate.

@NGCS-ej4lz

2 ай бұрын

@@bootorcaesar It's almost like...these are Films or something.

@bootorcaesar

2 ай бұрын

@@NGCS-ej4lz Many films have done a good job at portraying the past accurately. This film was accurate, then inaccurate, then accurate, then inaccurate, if you're going to make movie like that then just make it in a fictional reality to save people the time for being wrong in any conversations.

0:35 “in place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the dawn!”

@pacerrecap6386

6 ай бұрын

Treacherous as the sea. Good point.

@JnEricsonx

5 ай бұрын

@@pacerrecap6386 And now she's gonna be Lilith the Siren. As in Borderlands.

The swimming horse always gets me.

@maearcher4721

Жыл бұрын

I just noticed-the horse jumping from ship is without harness and this one which is swimming is with harness. I like to interpret it as both horses surviving.

@anibalcesarnishizk2205

4 ай бұрын

It was the English kamikaze.

@Headintodreams

Ай бұрын

That horse is like, "Nope I'm not a part of this war."

"I, too can command the wind, sir!"

America has no idea how a loss on Englands side would have shaped its history. Truly one of the most important historical turning points of all time.

@breannaWard-dw6xj

29 күн бұрын

Yes I know my fellow countrymen don't really think like this either. But I know how important this was and the fact that america is basically built because it wants more and more religious freedom that the protestants started. America couldn't be what it is today if something like Spain and catholicism had us.

@gml4776

13 күн бұрын

@@breannaWard-dw6xj Spain liberated the USA from England, with the help of Galvez, the Spanish royal roads, weapons and the blockade of the Mississippi. In addition, during those years, Mexico was much more relevant on an economic level and much more advanced, the same as Peru, the Spanish viceroyalties were rich until the 19th century, the USA won due to the disorder within Mexico and the history of America changed in 1848, Mexico was so powerful that the USA preferred to expand towards British Canada in the war of 1812 than go through Mexico.

My brother went to sea (US Navy, USS Barney) in the early 1980's and came home with many stories of how beautifully majestic the ocean could be, and how terrible it often was. Waves tossing your ship like a toy, men sick in their beds because the decks often seemed more vertical than not, cold food because the weather was too rough. Not often, but enough for you to both love and fear the sea. As for myself, I have stood upon the beach near Seaside, Oregon, and felt through the very earth beneath me, the thunder of the waves hammering the cliffs half a mile down the beach. I have watched the sky turn green, and then black, and felt the force of wind as it pushed the waves and rain ever onward, unstoppable, unyielding. It makes you feel small, when you look upon something so relentless, so timeless, so majestically awesome (in the true meaning of that word) that it swallows the earth, and hammers the stones to dust. You truly know the answer to the question, "which lasts longer, the Mountain or the Sea?"

@Trund27

4 ай бұрын

You’re an incredible writer. Thank you for this splendid comment.

Love how the little girl has an Elizabeth doll.

@MakiLeyva-hn3kz

Жыл бұрын

😅😅😅😮

@kimm.8800

8 ай бұрын

The little girl is the king's daughter Isabella Clara Eugenia. Her father appointed her governor-regent over the Spanish Netherlands (Belgium), so she also became a ruling woman when she became an adult!

@christopherharmon2433

8 ай бұрын

Her father (the King of Spain) was going to make her the Queen of England.

After the fiasco of the Invincible Armada, Elizabeth I wanted to take advantage of Spain's weakness to destroy its power. England, however, suffered its greatest catastrophe on the sea. The Counter Armada: this was the greatest Spanish naval victory over England that almost nobody counts. Of the 180 ships that had sailed to take Spain, 102 returned with many of their men infected by the plague suffered at sea and which they spread when they went ashore. Of the 27,667 men who had embarked, only 3,722 survived. This expedition - whose losses were double those of the Invincible Armada - made it the greatest naval catastrophe in the history of England.

@felipedeanjou1804

Жыл бұрын

Eso nunca paso Jajajajaja

@starkiler13

Жыл бұрын

​​@@felipedeanjou1804ue sabras tu pardillo que ni un documento te has dignado a leer😂

@felipedeanjou1804

Жыл бұрын

@@starkiler13 no llores

@starkiler13

Жыл бұрын

@@felipedeanjou1804 no llores tú anda

@felipedeanjou1804

Жыл бұрын

@@starkiler13 no llores

this scene gives me so much goosebumps, love it

Historically speaking, the English fleet was actually larger, with faster more maneuverable ships.

@VirtuousLiam

2 жыл бұрын

@Lavender Raine No it's true, england had more armed merchant vessels and Warships than spain. England had the direct backing of the dutch too. The victory isn't nearly as impressive as people seem to think It is.

@kyomademon453

2 жыл бұрын

@Lavender Raine 1, the weather destroyed the fleet although not the entirety of it since it was sailing to the netherlands not england, 2 the English counter attack was a lot bigger and got utterly destroyed by the spanish instead of weather, 3 had the spanish won england would still be speaking english since spain never cared over replacing the regional languages of its empire, that was a thing that occurred once the bourbon dynasty of french origin got the throne

@crazyclown4782

2 жыл бұрын

It’s true the English had more ships but the armada consisted on much bigger heavily armed ships… armadas firepower overwhelmed the English by far! but tactics and a ferocious wind that blew the armada northwards gave the English the win and that’s the truth.

@juanmorales5133

2 жыл бұрын

@@crazyclown4782 win? Stalemate amigo. English armada a year later in Spain led by Francis drake the pirate was a real battle and YES ,the kingdom of Spain won.

@jodybranson925

2 жыл бұрын

@@crazyclown4782 The English had purpose built warships known as race built gallons! They also had shorter gun carriages for faster loading than the Spanish ships! Henry VIII's "MARY ROSE " was two generations a head of Philip's ships

I guess she did command the wind after all.

Wow greatest trailer ever

I love her Gown. ❤❤❤

They were a maverick Protestant power that nobody expected could defeat the the might of the Spanish Empire.

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

It is true, and thanks to that battle England was not occupied. But Spain never believed that the English defeated us. We always thought there was a little Royal Navy action, but it was the storms. In 1588, Spain was invading Germany, forcing the south and Palatinate to retain the Catholic religion. In 1589 we destroyed Drake's invincible fleet, sinking 80 ships. Elisabeth was so angry that she condemned Drake to be a lighthouse keeper. In 1590 Spain invades Paris, forcing the king of France to accept the Catholic religion. In 1595-96, Drake loses 5 battles in the Spanish Caribbean and dies. In 1596 and 1597 Spain sent two more fleets of more than 130 ships to invade the British Isles. Both were stopped due to storms. Still another fleet in 1718 was stopped by storms. And 1779-82, we sent another invasion fleet to England. But we were only able to make a naval blockade of England, capturing two British fleets of 24 and 55 ships (among them 39 war frigates), which sank the London stock exchange, and allowed Spain to give the Spanish dollar to the USA, and the independence. But the invasion was not possible. Amphibious invasions are always complicated. Philip II of Spain had already been king of England in 1554-58, when he married Mary Tudor, half-Spanish queen of England. If they had had a son, if there had not been 4 great storms... Spain invaded southern England in 1377, 1380-81 and 1411, with small ships. There are many factors. The Royal Navy did what it could, but they only knew of the movements of the Spanish fleet in 1588 and 1805 (before Trafalgar) not the other 8 invasion attempts.

Japanese typhoon destroyed the Mongol fleet . Same thing happened to Persia fleet

The two greatest monarchs in England’s history are named ELIZABETH!

@MercurialRed9

2 жыл бұрын

Boudicca, Elizabeth I, Victoria, Elizabeth II - Four British queens whose reigns shaped ancient, Ye Olde, and modern Britain, and the world.

@juanmorales5133

2 жыл бұрын

@@MercurialRed9 lo siento, pero la mejor Reina fue Isabel de Castilla

@VersusARCH

Жыл бұрын

Longshanks 😎

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

@@MercurialRed9 this.

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

@@MercurialRed9 not many people remember boudicca.

This song makes me think of the man of steel trailer god that was a good year I miss 2013

@SpLiC3

Жыл бұрын

Spot on mate haha

"I too can command the wind, sir! I have a hurricane in me that will strip Spain bare if you dare to try me!" She was right.

My high school was named spanish point secondary school because most of the fleet sank off west coast of Ireland not England we still find cannons off there ships

@imcallingjapan2178

5 ай бұрын

It's said that Spanish sailors and soldiers cast shore from sunken ships just remained there in Ireland and married, giving rise to "Black Irish" people of partly Spanish descent

Visually perfect

The Spanish fleet was still drunk from the Battle of Lepanto. They thought they can make another miracle in England just like what they did to the Ottoman empire. The Spanish Armada failed big time. The odds was in favor for Queen Elizabeth.

One of the greatest armadas in history shattered by the wrath of the almighty.

@YwY-ct5yq

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the Protestants apparently gained the favor of the Christian god that day... Both countries were probably devote Christians... But more accurately it was simply the weather and Spanish Arrogance that defeated the Spanish fleet ..

@juanmorales5133

2 жыл бұрын

@@YwY-ct5yq England did the same the following year 1589 and that was a real battle. The aftermath...the Spanish empire defeated England and kept ruling the overseas.

@juanmorales5133

2 жыл бұрын

@@YwY-ct5yq I agree with you but the Spanish kept ruling the overseas fir 3 centuries and we do not forget that Nelson was defeated at Tenerife by general Gutierrez and this Spanish heroe forgive the Nelson life

@arishokqunari1290

2 жыл бұрын

@@juanmorales5133 THe spanish ruled the atlantic only until the beginning of the 18th century

@DadsWatchingYouTube

Жыл бұрын

The Almighty? Sorry bro, the almighty is on the side of us Papists. Youre welcome to come over, we make better wine.

Thanks soooooo much!! 1:05

Epic scene

The storm was so violent that Spanish ships were driven north around the tip of Scotland and west of Ireland with ships being destroyed along the way. It is said some Spanish were washed up on the coast of Ireland, rescued by the Irish villagers and ended up intermarrying with Irish women. This is supposed to be where the "Black Irish" originated. Even in the 20th century people with light skin, blue eyes and black hair were saud to have Irish coloring.

It’s just weather. Tying natural weather to being ‘English’ is a reach and I won’t have it 🤣 Love the scene though.

2:35 her costume is much brighter than my future 😂

It is funny to me how, back in this time, everyone thought god is on their side.

@thedrinkinggamemaker9749

2 жыл бұрын

In one tempestuous moment, God truly was the God of England

@thedrinkinggamemaker9749

Жыл бұрын

@@chinopisces oh yes, He blew and they were scattered!

@davidpar2

Жыл бұрын

God is on everyone’s side. He showed the Spanish the wrong of their ways.

@rc59191

Жыл бұрын

They still do nowadays theres a great quote from Cromwell about everyone saying God is on their side do they ever stop to think if God wonders who is on his.

@adrianstent7009

Жыл бұрын

That’s what Cromwell said

Both movies awesome

Watching the blaze, Cate must’ve been kicking herself for not bringing some prawns to the barbie.

Imagine defeating the Spanish thanks to a storm, leaving them unprotected and then taking advantage of the opportunity to attack Lisbon with your counter-armada and being defeated and finally lose the war but 450 years later you're the one making a movie about it

@juanmorales5133

2 жыл бұрын

Que puedes esperar de los piratas.

@felipeii7466

Жыл бұрын

@Boleyns no one cares about britain your kingdom has been losing influence for +100 years Spain and the UK are countries that had their golden ages at different points in history and that does not imply that one "won" the british empire expanded more, the Spanish empire lasted twice as long Today there are more Catholics and native Spanish speakers than Anglicans and native English speakers, but English is a better known language (thanks to the USA) and if you were talking about that particular war, then no. Britain did not win. had to sign a peace treaty that forced her to withdraw from the 80-year war

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@Boleyns jajahaja. ⁰your country is a protectorate of USA. You are a USA colony England was part of the Spanish empire and Ireland by Felipe II. The English armada was destroyed in 1589 attacking La coruña . Nelson was defeated by general Gutierrez at the battle of tenerife,etc,etc. Soanish empire on which the sun never set. You got the Spanish leftover. Have a lovely day. Stop saying bollocks.

@liarosi1719

Жыл бұрын

@@felipeii7466 i don’t think Spaniards have any say in England loosing relevance, Spain and its unnecessary monarchy speaks for itself.

@felipeii7466

Жыл бұрын

@@system3008 what has Britain achieved in the last 100 years (other than stupidly losing its entire empire without even fighting to keep it)?

great ending

Elizabeth I Action Figure comes with everything you see here, including wearable shower curtain…Sir Walter Raleigh sold separately…

People don't realize the significance this has as an important point in history

@danjones9704

Жыл бұрын

Except it didn’t really happen? Phillip II never abdicated the Spanish throne at all and his son Phillip III succeeded him on his death? Pretty lame that the people who created a film based on history just threw actual history out the window in such a really haphazard way.

@cpj93070

11 ай бұрын

@@danjones9704Cry more Spanish boy, God was on Englands side that day.

@eziolua11

9 ай бұрын

@@cpj93070 God sunk english ships afterwards, God always laughs with supreme strength

@cpj93070

9 ай бұрын

@@eziolua11 😂😂Clown, England wasn't trying to invade Spain though were they, Every time Spain tried to invade they got god's smiting hand. Glorious.

Hahahaha, cool ! But... Barely a year later, Elizabeth sent an even larger Armada under Francis Drake command to take advantage of this spanish failure (thanks to a storm and not to any english strategy), destroy the remains of the Felicisima Armada, to seize the Azores and Portugal... And they got their assess handed spectaculary. The English royal treasure got drained and Elizabeth had to plead for peace. Impressive scene, I admit.

If Henry were alive today, I can picture him living in a trailer park, yelling at his wife while drunk(he probably would run a still). All his friends would probably call him "BUBBA"

A port in the storm ❤❤❤

The weather….. 🎉🎉🎉

Portal…. a safe passage through the storm …. ❤❤❤

This battle actually happened closer to the French coast off Calais. This movie makes it look like it happened off the English coast.

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

Do you realise how stupid that sounds.

@ihatewhitey6689

Жыл бұрын

@@system3008 wut u no dodo

I want to see a movie about the English Armada. That would be good.

@acusticamenteconvusional9936

Жыл бұрын

@@leguan1 to each their own

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@@leguan1 results Enhland defeat ..1589 the counter armada and Francis drake the pirate running away with the tale between legs. Nelson defeated. Battle of tenerife. The invasion of america by norris expedition the most humiliating defeat at Cartagena of indias COLOMBIA. English still looking for drake corpse. Man has you already taken your pill?.jahaja.

@kartoffel4870

Жыл бұрын

@@juanmorales5133 I think the biggest insult for you is that we actually forgot our wars with you, most people think of the french at Trafalgar.

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@@kartoffel4870 YOU do not think...ESPAÑA think about.

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@@kartoffel4870 you mean...forgot your disastrous battles . Do not waste my time

Retracting Spanish ships went around Scotland and Ireland. That why you get many Irish people today with jet black hair and blue eyes.

King Philip actor is so hot

Don't fight against galadriel

When you checkmate your opponent when they got more material than you

The Island is sacred. It always has been.

When Daenerys showed up with dragon's and Harry Potter and his friends was epic

Same in the war of 1812 in DC

Few things have made me shiver in history like English courage.

@petette4442

7 ай бұрын

Yes, few things make one shiver like an army made of pirates and criminals.

@boffinin1

7 ай бұрын

@@petette4442No war was fought by saints

Elizabeth looked like a Pagan witch when she watched the fleet of the Spanish Inquidition go down... marvelous. The little girl is the king's daughter Isabella Clara Eugenia. Her father appointed her governor-regent over the Spanish Netherlands (Belgium), so she also became a ruling woman when she became an adult!

Imagine a movie where that same Philip II invades Germany in 1588, and Paris in 1590 (which makes one think that Elisabeth was an island) Imagine that Philip II arrives in England with a fleet commanded by the Duke of Alba, and becomes king of England (1554-58), upon marrying Mary Tudor, half-Spanish queen of England. And in the same movie you can include that Spain destroyed 80 ships of Drake's invincible fleet in 1589. You can also include that the English burned dozens of thousands of people at the stake as well, and that hundreds of thousands of people with other religions ( Catholics, Calvinists, Puritans...) had to flee to the 13 colonies, because they could not practice their religion. You can also add that women from England could not be actresses, while Spanish women were actresses and often theater entrepreneurs, as well as governors, admirals and the first women in Europe who went to university and were university professors. You can also include that the golden century of Spanish culture, leader in art, science, psychology, music and literature, was born thanks to Philip II of Spain. I know that film wouldn't win a Bafta award, but it's more real than this British film. I don't want to say that Philip II was an angel, but he was no worse than other kings of Europe.

I hope the horse made it to land.

Now we know this was an Asari spaceship that caused this weather effect.

They should show also how the counter armada was destroyed just a year after, same caliber or worst.

If that actually happened, Elizabeth had to feel like a god at that point

What's the name of the little girl holding a doll

IT'S​ 1 Good​ Scene Of The​ Golden​ Age

Come to think of it, both England and Japan were saved by heavenly winds, from absolute continental powers

anyone knows the name of the soundtrack?

Why do these films skip the Counter-Armada? When the following year, in 1589, the Spanish defeated the English invasion of Spain and it was also a disaster, for the English this time. I think it would create more historical accuracy and nuance, that Elizabeth sweeped that under the rug. The war actually lasted between 1585 and 1605 and it ended in a draw and there was more to it than just the failed Spanish invasion.

I bet if Charles v were still alive in Spanish armada failure he would be shock over Elizabeth

@wizardofoz9803

Жыл бұрын

Charles V had a mental breakdown after dealing with the realm he had. Spain, HRE, Italy, Burgundy, Americas. None of them connected, and many more strong enemies such as the French and Ottomans. A defeat like this would probably have killed him or drive him mad like his mother.

@Gloriaimperial1

Ай бұрын

@@wizardofoz9803 Charles V had very good mental health. In 1556 he ruled Germany. His son Philip was king of England, married to Mary Tudor, half-Spanish queen of England. At the same time they defeated the king of France, and they dominated Italy and the Netherlands. No one had that power, not even Rome. If this happens to Churchill or Queen Victoria, they would go crazy with glory, asking for a statue and a column of Nelson to the moon. However, Charles quietly retired to the hotel-monastery, knowing that Philip was going to invade Germany in 1588 (converting southern Germany and the Palatinate to Catholicism). He knew that Philip was going to destroy Drake's invincible fleet in 1589, destroying 60-80 ships, and he also knew that Philip was going to invade Paris in 1590 (converting France to catholicism)

2:35 The Gloriana Virgin Queen of England

A poor grasp of history but glorious cinematography.

O dia em que a bruxaria venceu.

Dr John Dee and the Angels pulled a blinder that time.

That guy couldn't handle a female sitting on the throne. His male ego couldn't handle it. That is why they started a war. Just a pissing contest. Egos, egos, egos. What to do with an inflated ego.

The english armada 1589 was defeated by the kingdom of Spain and francis drake humiliated by a woman MARIA PITA. Spain won the battle and kept ruling the overseas fir 3 centuries. Isabel of Castilla was the best queen. Spanish empire ruled England and Ireland with Maria I tudor's family

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

Sure it did.

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

I guess spain wins everything right?

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@Boleyns España descubrio el continente anericano. Whay did England go to America? Read a bit of history my pirate. Spain was even bigger than England a discover all you can imagine. English came after.

@kp361

Жыл бұрын

Juan Morales seems to be hallucinating their own version of 'history'. The Spanish Empire was defeated and Spaniards never ruled England.

@kp361

Жыл бұрын

@@juanmorales5133 Go and talk to your therapist, Juan.

Interesting to see all of this theather. It would be good if any of you guys do a bit of research and find out what happened during and after this event, in real life. For any spaniard this sounds like a comedy, to be honest

The time when England rules the waves

THE MYTH OF THE INVINCIBLE ARMADA The Spanish fleet that Philip II mustered is described as an 'invincible' Goliath against the little David of England's navy. Actually, it was the opposite. It was not even the largest fleet to have attacked England. The Spanish used around 130 ships, from war galleons to messenger ships and supply ships. Although the English navy was smaller, a large number of private and merchant ships were called up to create a force equal to that of the Spanish. And anyway, the invading fleet had been in trouble long before facing their English enemies. Shortly after leaving Lisbon, diseases attacked the crew, their food supplies rotted and they had very bad weather at sea. "We are very weak" All this forced them to stop in La Coruña to make repairs and provisions. The fleet commander wrote to Felipe confessing that "almost none of the members of the Navy have the knowledge or the ability to perform the tasks entrusted to them... we are very weak." But Philip said that the attack must continue anyway. The plan was for the Navy to sail down the English Channel to its narrowest point. There he was to meet an army of soldiers from the Netherlands led by the Duke of Parma, who were to be transported by barge to invade the county of Kent. However, before that the Spanish had to reach the Channel. Here they began to experience more problems. The first major casualties were self-inflicted: a crash and explosion led to the loss of two ships. Once the Spanish gained entry to the Channel, the next narrative stretch in the most popular accounts of history is Elizabeth I's moving speech to her men at Tilbury, on the north bank of the Thames. That famous piece of oratory, in which the queen tells the assembled troops that she may "have the body of a weak woman, but the heart and stomach of a king," has been dramatized in countless movies. Elizabeth is often shown riding a horse, dressed in white velvet or even armor. "I'll be her general," she tells her men. Isabel had devised the plan to address the troops while the Spanish were still in the Channel. However, when she did, the Navy was already facing defeat. Eleven days earlier, English warships had attacked the Spanish fleet while it was waiting in France to meet the Parma army. These burning ships caused the Spanish to panic, causing more accidents and losses. So when Elizabeth spoke her famous words at Tilbury, what was left of the Armada was already in retreat, racing to Ireland and Scotland so they could return home. And there, in the north, the mortal enemy of the Spanish was not Drake, Elizabeth I or the brave English sailors, but bad weather. Interestingly, the content and timing of Elizabeth I of England's speech have also "evolved" over time. The sources do not mention the famous "heart and stomach of a king" line until more than three decades after the event. But historians aren't sure she actually used those words. On the one hand, the defeat of the Armada did not bring victory in the war with Spain. In fact, that conflict lasted until the 17th century. On the other hand, the Spanish never saw what happened to the Armada as a significant setback. And that's because, in 1589, the English suffered an embarrassing or own naval disaster. That year, Drake led an attack known as the invincible English or Counterarmada, with the aim of destroying the rest of Felipe's fleet while it was undergoing repairs in Santander. It was a fiasco, in which 15,000 Englishmen were killed, and many of the 86 ships used in the attack were lost.

@dab0331

Жыл бұрын

The myth of English victory you mean. Weather destroyed the Spanish in this armada. In the 2nd armada (which England initiated) they got utterly destroyed by the Spanish

@juanmorales5133

Жыл бұрын

@@system3008 spain did not. it kept rulling the world.

@DanielLopez-zt4ig

Жыл бұрын

mucho texto.

@cpj93070

11 ай бұрын

After all them wars Spanish boy, we (Britain) had the last laugh you came crying for us for help as Napoleon backstabbed your country, Britain and Portugal saved your country and after became a nothing empire, while Britain went on the become the greatest in the world owning a quarter of the globe, you just think on that.

Based Divine Intervention.

@GranSinderesis

Жыл бұрын

1589 english ships in Spain... Holy Divide Intervention.

@wizardofoz9803

Жыл бұрын

​@@GranSinderesis Spanish Armada: Sent to depose Elizabeth, probably risking Civil War in England. If successful it would have crippled England for a whole century. English Armada: Sent to support anti-Habsburg Portuguese nobles, totally dependent on them. If successful, Spain would still exist, albeit without Portugal. The English won in the end, by the time of Trafalgar Spain could only face them with French aid.

@GranSinderesis

Жыл бұрын

@@wizardofoz9803 They were defeat in the time of James and Charles I so they were defeat... After Hasburg the new dinasty make a complete change in the policy of the whole Kingdom also they didn't fight for the other territories like Naples, Sicily, Milan, Rosellon, Burgundy... Portugal. What were they doing? Phillip II haved to make law that avoid having new dinasty better an Austrian than a French. Charles VI than Phillip V.

Who is the little girl? What roll does she play in history?

@bean-pod

4 ай бұрын

She's Isabella Clara Eugenia of Spain. Phillips daughter. In 1588 she actually would have been about 20

Yo whats good

And the heavens opened up and proclaimed hereth be Englands one true righteous queen

"The Lord has judged." - Elizabeth Tudor

Who's the little girl supposed to be??

@hannahnoh3899

Жыл бұрын

phillip's daughter

@loganbrasch7366

Жыл бұрын

Phillip's daughter, Isabella Clara Eugenia

@PADARM

Жыл бұрын

Princess of Spain

God helped Elizabeth.

@julianjv7325

5 ай бұрын

Yes AND after that he failed to her when she wants to take advantage of the spanish weak. 😂😂😂😂

The TRUTH is the Spanish didn't really want to take England. The Spanish just wanted to install Huevos Revueltos on English breakfast tables instead of Kippers and Scones. This fight was about gastronomy.

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

Completely. Spain invaded Germany in 1588, and Paris in 1590, forcing those countries to accept Catholicism as their official religion, and they continued drinking stout and croissant for breakfast. British breakfast is untouchable!

GOOD BYE PSYCHO'S!!!!!

Philippe cries like the Hispanists in the comment box

Your majesty, your GF broke up with you and blocked you. We have all to get her back, but she has concluded she is done. *ME: **1:58*

@robertolopez9483

Жыл бұрын

Don’t humiliate yourself for someone who doesn’t love you.

No matter how big and strong u might think you are the all mighty god's wrath is worse then anyone has ever witnessed

❤ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿❤️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🌹🌹🌹

0:48 Now I understand why there was another split from the Catholic church: the Church of England. 2:35 Pointy diadem, pointy stars, pointy window sills, pointy hands as a medium, it's ISHTAR.

The day the witch won.

Looking back, this has Cersei Lannister AND Daenerys Targaryan vibes all over it.

It was certainly not the will of any god, but the will and courage of English men and a lucky wind.

Russia's two greatest generals: gen. January and Gen. February.

That is what you get from fighting about religion…

@BritishBraon

Жыл бұрын

Religion is like a political ideology back then. Nowadays we still fight due to ideology, nothing changed.

who is little in real history?

Why did Spain attack England, I thought the Spanish king or prince had visited to see if they could marry.

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

Philip II was king of England in 1554-58, when he married Mary Tudor, half-Spanish queen of England. The problem is that the English supported the independence of the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg and attacked our imperial territories in America and other places, sometimes without declaring war. That's why Spain sent 5 massive invasion fleets to the British Isles in 1588, 1596, 1597, 1718 and 1779-82 (in addition to the invasions of southern England in 1377, 1380-81 and 1411). The first 4 were stopped by storms (1588...). In the latter (1779-82) Spain made a naval blockade of England, capturing two British fleets of 24 and 55 ships, which sank the London Stock Exchange, and helped greatly in the independence of the USA. But the invasion was very complicated, and the French allies were not safe.

@SeanScot36

4 ай бұрын

@@Gloriaimperial1 Thank you I’m grateful, I wonder what British society would have been like if the Spanish had won the wars, would we have been enslaved or become Spanish !?!

Sad day for mankind.

@arishokqunari1290

2 жыл бұрын

only for some catholics

@DanielLopez-zt4ig

Жыл бұрын

Luckily catholicism survived enough for Tolkien to invent fantasy.

@cpj93070

11 ай бұрын

After all them wars Spanish boy, we (Britain) had the last laugh you came crying for us for help as Napoleon backstabbed your country, Britain and Portugal saved your country and after became a nothing empire, while Britain went on the become the greatest in the world owning a quarter of the globe, you just think on that.

this was a battle of 2 worlds England was in her way to create social liberalism while Spain was surrendered to religious authoritarianism, the entire history of the west would have been different if the result was different

@SpLiC3

Жыл бұрын

Well said that man!

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

England didn't want social liberalism.

@system3008

Жыл бұрын

There was no such thing as a party system at that time it was a monarchy.

Imagine if Spain won?

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

Spain won Germany in 1588 (that's why the Germans in the Palatinate and south are Catholic). Nothing happened, they simply continued with their German, but Catholic, governors. Spain invaded Paris in 1590. Nothing happened, France accepted the Catholic religion and had French kings.

The next year, England sent an armada back at Spain, it was even bigger, privately funded by basically aristocratic venture capital... it failed miserably, saw thousands of Englishmen killed and almost bankrupted the country.

@KristianCapalik968

11 ай бұрын

And then the Spanish send a second and third armada (which are also not remembered). The reason why none of this battles are remembered has more to do with their political irrelevance than nationalistic pride.

@enriquebergos

10 ай бұрын

No creo q sea irrelevante la fracasada contraarmada inglesa contra La Coruña y Lisboa; la batalla d la isla dvFlores en 1591; el desembarco español en Cornualles y el saqueo d Newlyn , Pensanze, Moushole; el fracaso de la expedición Drake - Hawkins en el Caribe en 1595-1596; los combates q se sucedieron entre ingleses,,franceses y holandeses contra españoles en la Bretaña francesa, en Craon, en 1592;,en Normandía (Rouan), en el norte d Francia (Noyon,,1593); en Flandes.(Nimega, Zutphen, Río Lippe, Hulst, Neewport, Ostende);;las tomas españolas d Calais en 1596 y Amiens en 1597, ésta última recuperada por Francia, con auxilio inglés.La victoria inglesa d Cádiz;en 1596; la armada española de 1596, q, a pesar d repetidas tormentas, consiguió desembarar tropas españolas en Falmouth, pero ante la no llegada d refuerzos, abandonó la isla, la expedición española a Kinsale, Irlanda, en 1601. En fin, la guerra siguió entre Inglaterra y España en todos los frentes( el Atlántico, Caribe, Francia y Flandes) hasta 1604, cuando exhaustas ambas naciones firmaron la paz d Londres, ya con otros reyes en ambos lados,.Felipe III d España y Jaime I d Inglaterra y Escocia.Otra cosa en q en las escuelas inglesas despachen esta guerra sólo con " La Armada " d 1588, y omitan otros episodios no tan agradables para Inhlaterra, pero esta guerra duró 20 años y fue una sangría d hombres y dinero para las dos monarquías.

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

@@KristianCapalik968 Well, the internet is changing things. Now everyone is knowing the importance of these Spanish victories. Irrelevant was England in the 16th-17th centuries. Spain invaded Germany in 1588, forcing the Palatinate and southern Germany to become Catholic. And in 1590 we invaded Paris, forcing France to be Catholic. This, together with the victory of 1589, makes us think that England exists thanks to the island. Spain began global expansion 200 years before England and France. It would not have been fair to say that Rome was irrelevant in the 16th century. Since then Italy has progressed a lot. Now all the countries of Europe are small countries. The United Kingdom reduced its size 144 times in the 20th century, and cannot compete with the great giants (USA, China, India, Russia or the European Union). Spain won decisive battles against the British in 1589, in 1741 (Cartagena de Indias, destruction of 50 British ships), 1779-82 Spanish blockade of England, capturing 2 British fleets of 24 and 55 ships, sinking the London Stock Exchange and allows Spain to give the Spanish dollar to the USA and independence. After Trafalgar 1805 (where we only lost 11 ships) Spain defeats the British in Argentina and Uruguay 1806-07, capturing the redcoats and British generals. In addition to defeating Nelson 3 times in 1797, capturing him in Tenerife. All these victories in the period in which Spain made its world legacy (1500-1800) allow Spanish to be the second mother tongue after Chinese, with 480 million mother tongue speakers. English: 380 million (40% born in parts of the USA that the British never controlled) All these victories in the 5 continents mean that there are 800 million additional Catholics, made by Spain (200 million in Europe and 100 million in Asia) 120 million of Anglicans. Furthermore, Spanish and Portuguese are the same languages in 89% of the words. The United Kingdom had a very slow imperial development, and was only able to surpass the territory of the Spanish empire in 1885, only to lose everything before 1960. But that served to make many colonies. At the time those colonies were going to ban English (like the ban on English in India in 1960) the USA was already the great power that emerged after WW2, and that saved the English legacy in the world. The colonies made English interesting for a few more decades, sponsored by the USA, as a studied language. So in some ways the Spanish and British empires were very successful.

@KristianCapalik968

4 ай бұрын

@@Gloriaimperial1 this is overall not true and very unhelpful in understanding the importance of the British empire. While it is true to say that England was less relevant than Spain in the 16th and 17th century, Spain simply never reached the level of relevance at its peak as the British did during theirs, which was mostly due to the impact of the Industrial revolution. When looking as to why the Spanish Armada defeat was so catastrophic, it is almost entirely due to its repercussions in the world order of importance and it is more nuanced than just a count on how many ships lost or whether England retaliated successfully or not. To simplify the ramifications of the Spanish Armada, King Philip the Second of Spain spent 11 Million Ducats on his famed fleet, the Spanish Armada failure coupled with troubles with the ottomans put Spain at a financial deficit as the gold extracted from the Americas was no longer covering for their mainland expenses, and Spain would ultimately never recover from this gold deficit with most of their world influence dwindling by late 17th/early 18th century. Regardless as to your opinion as to the importance of the Battle of Trafalgar, Spain did loose it and it not only lost but it lost as a satellite napoleonic state, the biggest repercussion of the Trafalgar victory was not the Spanish loss but the French disengagement in large scale naval challenges towards the Royal Navy. Indeed your point of “Spanish victories being erased from the narrative” is pretty weak, Spain and Britain continuously engaged in conflicts with very nuanced results, however given that you are speaking English and commenting about “misconceptions”, I’ll let you be the judge as to who had the most favourable outcomes. To your point of Spain being more influential due to population density of Spanish speakers, the easiest rebuttal is income inequality between the Anglo-sphere and the Hispanic one, while only accounting for 5% of the population, the Anglo-sphere accounts for 43% of the worlds wealth, Spanish speakers make up 8% and account for around 5% of the worlds wealth, quantity does not automatically mean wealth or political power. To put it simply, Britain was simply a larger empire that had more settler colonies than Spain, whom preferred extractionary colonies, not only that but Spain was a non-industrialised, mostly medieval empire at its peak, Britain was modern and industrialised. This meant that they had more access to resources which they used to advance in technology, military and economic growth which they shaped to their own benefit; the technology you used to write your comment such as a touch screen or the internet are British, military equipment such as radars, engines, tanks, and lasers are British, the current mixed economy that Spain itself operates with is…British. While it is true that Spain was most definitely influential during the 15th, 16th and mid 17th century, its influence cannot be compared to that Britain was sprung to due to its prowess in the Industrial revolution, it is simply factually untrue to imply that there was ever an event during the Spanish empire’s duration that could compare in terms of impact to the world and the present day.

@Gloriaimperial1

4 ай бұрын

@@KristianCapalik968 It is very easy to talk about a medieval empire in the 16th-17th centuries. Although Spain made the first globalization of the world, ending the feudal era, with a leading golden century in art, science, politics, diplomacy and economy. The Spanish empire was as unmedieval as the territories of the Spanish empire in Italy, Germany, France, Belgium and the Netherlands. If you talk about America, it was the most indigenous place in the world in 1492. Now all Western countries. 5 of them have very high human development, among the 66 most developed countries in the world: Chile, Argentina, Costa Rica, Panama and Uruguay. You can't imagine what it's like to include a majority indigenous population in Western civilization. It took centuries for Rome to do that in Hispania, Gaul, Germany and Britain. The British simply gave up doing that in South Africa and India, and created social Darwinism and apartheid. Saying that the Roman Empire is worse than the USA, because it is medieval or primitive, compared to the USA is ridiculous. Rome was born before and died before. The Spanish empire was born 200 years before the British and French empires, and died before. Within 200 years the technology of China and India will be so powerful that today's Silicon Valley and NASA will be primitive (not to mention the Victorian British Empire). But it makes no sense to disqualify the influence of previous empires. You're just talking about a still photo. In 2050, China and India will be the leading world powers, with 2.8 billion inhabitants. The USA can do nothing to prevent it, with 330 million, nor Australia with 28 or Canada with 35. This same century, just with the rate of population growth, Latin America will have 3 times the population of the USA. They may be 2 and a half times poorer than the USA in the year 2100, and yet more powerful and influential. In the world there is now a process of development of previously poor lands. Now there is air transport, better and bigger and faster ships, Internet, air conditioning. The entire planet (with some exceptions such as Afghanistan or countries at war) grows, because they already know how to dominate their resources, their banks and their influences. Saying that the British empire is larger may be self-evident. But not much bigger. The Berlin conference of 1885, between friendly countries, made a world division. Then the British obtained, in 1900, 35 million km2 total. If you look at the Spanish explorations with the Treaty of Tordesillas, sanctioned by Rome, as a legal norm, Spain occupied 30 million km2. The British included in the British Empire the frozen islands of Canada, Africa where Livingston is lost or India with 560 independent princes. Then Spain can include the entire southern USA, where we discover the great plains, the great canyon of El Colorado and Vancouver Island. Just look at the name of the western states: California, Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, Florida. We annexed the Portuguese empire. And we occupied Borneo, Papua New Guinea, Northern Taiwan with military bases. We even have a map of Hawaii (16th century) and a helmet of New Zealand (16th century). The only difference is that in 1885 it is easier to sell ownership of land to the world. But Spain arrived just like the British everywhere, at a time when the Pacific Ocean was known as the Spanish lake. Why does Spain have more mother speakers? Because Hispanic America has 90% of native Spanish speakers. 99% speak Spanish. 85% Catholic. Commonwealth has 10% native English speakers. Less than 10% are Christians. Basically the British traded like the Greek colonies. Spain civilized like Rome. The only places that the British civilized are the 13 colonies, which had 3 million inhabitants in 1783, and Australia, New Zealand, Canada, part of South Africa or Jamaica, which together had 20 or 25 million inhabitants in 1948. The Spanish empire It had 60 million Hispanic Americans in cities and more than 15 million in Europe. Spain creates its own aircraft carriers, which Australia buys. We also create state-of-the-art frigates and submarines that fire missiles at 1900 km. We participate in the new European warplane program with our own technology, on an equal basis with Germany and France. We are the second country with the most high-speed trains, also one of the 10 countries that have launched a rocket into space, and we are the tenth largest scientific research power in the world. We surpass France and Italy in human development and have the highest life expectancy in all of Europe. Your mistake is that you are left with a fixed photo of the world, based on prejudices. The isolated peninsulas of southern Europe have always had more difficulties trading with central and northern Europe. It was never competitive to travel 40 days on horseback to sell something in Germany, when the Frenchman sells and returns home for dinner. But the world changes. The Spanish empire made the food revolution, the migratory revolution, the city revolution, the Asian market revolution, the banking revolution. You can keep the industrial revolution. We built with engineers in the world, Europe, Africa, Asia and America, 2,300 stone cities with all services, 40 universities, 900 hospitals, 400 cathedrals, 300 fortresses, thousands of nursery schools. Do you think we have to wait for the British Empire to fill all that with printing presses, shoes, furniture, mirrors, ships, clothes, paper, minerals, metals, wood, weapons? That's Industry.

🤬😡 BAD DEFEAT SPAIN !!