2:38 I meant "this iron village produces iron for his city" of course, not food ;)

@AibekDandaev

10 ай бұрын

yeah, we've got it) donn worry

Your commentary is very helpful and doubles the enjoyment, keep it up, bro :-

Black corps where my fav units becouse they gain exp fast (and they look cool) same for british granadiers. Btw the prussian player struggled a lot becouse his economy was horrible he fight almost 50%of his battles with no coal/iron so after first volley his troops didnt reload.... one key component of 1 vs 1 in this game is continuously trade resource you not use like stone for what you need, and upgrade villages.

@napoleonicwarsonline

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah I also think the Black Corps' uniforms look pretty cool You are right. The lack of coal was a problem for me at the beginning of the game. Maybe should have traded food for coal more often. In my defense: this was a game I played shortly after a long 5 year break of playing C2 ;)

@ParabellumStoria

3 жыл бұрын

@@napoleonicwarsonline back when i was playng i remember the n1 factor that made difference was economy, i always rushed better units and play defensive: the trick with the granadier build is that they can absorb a volley even in the face from any other unit and then shoot and melee back and win, and majority of players tend to shoot their volley way sooner (i remember player shooting 2 volleys of muskets into my granadiers from yellow zone and my granadiers tank it, shoot back, shoot nades, melee and route both enemy musks, experience allow you to tank and shoot only when they on red zone) instead build low ones, trade resource upgrade for double barraks, double triple stables , massive wood-stone production for sell it and upgrade gold-coal-iron mines.

Is it just me that prefer cossacks 2 graphics over cosacks 3 if they ever went and do cossacks 4 they should base it on cossacks 2

@napoleonicwarsonline

3 жыл бұрын

I agree completely. Also, while C1/3 is more fast-paced I like the more tactical and strategic gameplay of C2 better.

@Travis015

3 жыл бұрын

@@napoleonicwarsonline yeah me two plus c1 and 3 seem more chaotic during battle and there is almost no strategy that u can use except for more number and Stronger army thats it unlike c2 where u got the moral range formation placement ....

stacking 6 calvary formation is very strong in frontaly attacy on the infantry

I would like to know what the meta is. Which nations are ranked against others and what not

Pls make a video how manage the economy! Building, market, mines etc

@napoleonicwarsonline

4 жыл бұрын

I will answer it in my next video

OMG ppl still play this trainwreck?! Very impressive indeed. Nice vid, btw. :)

@AbdunK99

2 жыл бұрын

It is at least way better than Cossacks 3 :-

@NeoZeta

2 жыл бұрын

@@AbdunK99 You mean Cossacks 1 with overhauled graphics? Yep, it is. Though Cossacks 1 remains unsurpassed.

@KroM234

2 жыл бұрын

Cossacks 2 is the best title from this whole franchise. The only thing it lacked was a more developped conquest mode and a random map generator.

@NeoZeta

2 жыл бұрын

@@KroM234 Nahh. Cossacks 2 had many things missing. The game was incomplete at launch. Leaks revealed that. And it was never fully completed. It COULD have been the best. But Cossacks 1 remains supreme. Cossacks 2 doesn't even have simple things like "fire-at-will", just to name one of the features they cut for no reason.

@KroM234

2 жыл бұрын

@@NeoZeta Because fire at will forces hisotrically inaccurate gameplay upon the player. Cossacks 1 is all about spamming files of untis in blobs and attack-ground them in the enemy base. Formations are useless, no strategy, just optimization and spamming all over. Cossacks 2 mechanics, although restrictive, forces the player to account for morale, use volleys of guns, fatigue, the use of roads and chokepoints, more strategic use and collection of resources, and focus more on tactics and strategies. i'm not trying to convince you though, I know the two communities are opposed since C2's launch. I always been a Cossacks 2 guy, love the approach and formula, even the UI is spot on imo. The graphics were awesome for the time.