01:29 Hinduism 27:50 Buddhism

inadequate volume

Enjoyed it

0:36 ANTHEM of PHILOSOPHY

The word "Hindu" is almost never mentioned in any of the Hindu religious scriptures.

@ric_clicks9195

3 жыл бұрын

Because it was given by the Mughal rulers

@charananekibalijaun8837

3 жыл бұрын

@@ric_clicks9195 that's incorrect

@michalaugustniak433

2 жыл бұрын

hmm... a shortcut in behalf of the documentary writers perhaps

@RohitSingh-vo6sq

2 жыл бұрын

@@ric_clicks9195 Persian specifically

Why they are showing streets and poverty.. instead of temple's and holy places for Hinduism documentary . Lol

@Seven-ld9zv

Жыл бұрын

because that's the way we get through life and understanding of the teachings; through simplicity and suffering, not so much through wealth and luxury since the way in which we use wealth and luxury is to take life less troublesome instead of laying the focus on how we actually deal with and handle suffering.

@ikartikthakur

Жыл бұрын

@@Seven-ld9zv poverty is human cunningness ..money oriented thinking .. it's not natural . Overall human inability to work together .. Suffering is different thing ..it comes when you have everything and still lacking peace . Which buddha like prince can feel ..not any begger . Rich suffer more than beggar ..rich nations are in deep suffering ..while poor still have hopes in future . Anyway ..I just ment that .. hinduism was not poor religion .. developed for poor in poverty ..if you're making documentary show authentic .. India is poor today and irreligious but when hinduism flourished it was richest nation on planet ..but today it's poor state ..the modern system from West .. hardly works in India . While making documentary on ancient religion ..show ancient ruins - temples and artwork ..that what i was saying . It's like showing modern America in name of Christianity as Religion without showing no Church and old ruins . 👍🏻

@Seven-ld9zv

Жыл бұрын

@@ikartikthakur I'm not even gonna respond to this (or even read your entire reply). Saying poverty is "not natural" and that suffering only "comes when you have everything and still lacking peace" and that Buddha can feel suffering but a beggar can't... I truly marvel at your disconnection. So you must be rich because if I believe your comment, only rich people can suffer ? Or do you mean to say that you have never suffered because you're not rich ? Suffering comes in all sizes from huge loss to the loss of a dime and it's different for every one of us because we all give different meaning to the loss. Suffering can be huge or tiny... so too with happiness. But please, don't believe me.

@sen5541

Жыл бұрын

​@@Seven-ld9zv ignore him , even if this documentry showed Hindu temples it still start with beggars and show poverty coz majority of beggars are found in front of temples in India its fact u can ask any local indian about this

@ikartikthakur

Жыл бұрын

@@Seven-ld9zv Yes ..I mean about temporary suffering is there for beggar too ..from rich i mean enough weath with less work . It's personal opinion . I am saying , only rich person can see his wealth is not giving him happiness ..and he's already rich in society so ..he leaves riches and goes to sages . While poor is stucked too .. definitely suffering but it's cum physical ..! Not mental ..which is actually called suffering . You can't teach meditation to poor ..cuz his suffering is just hunger and shelter . But rich suffer mind

This woman doesn't seem to know what a "myth" is? The birth of the Buddha, out of the side of his mother at the "level of the heart" (the heart chakra, sacred heart of Jesus etc., which she didn't say) is a "myth" (a truth, and whether it happened actually or not, is beside the point). The western world belives that a "myth", is a falsehood, which is the pejorative understanding of the word. That's how far gone we are as a culture, lol. No native culture, far eastern etc., insists on the actuality of the "myth".

Zen Buddhism originated in China (called Chan in modern Chinese, Dzien in Medieval Chinese).

@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885

2 жыл бұрын

yes Master Nan, Huai-chin is an excellent writer on Chan philosophy. or Master Nan, Huaijin.

And they show a mosque when starting to talk about Hinduism and Buddhism! Most of the visuals are rubbish (some come from their other 'documentaries' and mismatched with the narrative), there are many factual mistakes and the mispronunciations by the narrator make this dire to listen to. Don't waste your time watching this as I did