Wow, America does indeed have a disturbing past.

@turtlesack100

3 жыл бұрын

MR. GUY anyone would be mad because of this disgusting country. I can probably see why u arent. Pro-slavery? Theres a lot more to be mad about than that

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

hell yeah. we’re toxic, broke, abusers, etc. it’s like my most recent boyfriend.

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

I wanna move to Canada, you guys seem really nice up there

@zacharyfelder6604

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesuschrist2065 except the Canadian government continues to oppress and kill Native Americans. and they are no better than the US with racism against black people.

@timkern9563

3 жыл бұрын

What's your real name? Why are you hiding? What's your purpose? And yes, it's in the past -- the idea is to learn from it and do the best we can from now on, not to punish the sons for the acts of the fathers. (Except in North Korea.) Put on your long pants and do something now, to make tomorrow better.

Whoever is using this for online learning, leave a like.

@JRed-jf7jn

3 жыл бұрын

Online school gang

Worst SC Decision ever, and worst Chief Justice ever.

@yofo1621

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe roe v wade... one allows murder one allows dehumanization... both completely abhorrent evil...

@dafluffypizza758

4 жыл бұрын

@@yofo1621 ok

@kingkante2913

3 жыл бұрын

@@yofo1621 oh stfu

@zacharyfelder6604

3 жыл бұрын

@@yofo1621 fetuses aren't real people so they don't deserve life. question why do you eat meat they where brutally killed for you to eat that burger.

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

i think the court ruled correctly but should have used better language. it was not the courts place to decide the issue of slavery. they ruled correctly about property though. it was congress or more likely the state's responsibility to rule about the issue of slavery. keep in mind this court case would have never made it very far at all if it wasn't for the fact that scott's original owners paid for his lawyers.

Dred Scott is an example of the legitimisation of immortality and the banality of evil.

Lincoln was like: Hold my Beer

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

500,000 die at the hands of their brother in one of the bloodiest wars in all of history. yeah. way to go mr. lincoln.

getting ready for that online ap government exam :/

@maevejoerss1055

4 жыл бұрын

im in seventh grade what is my teacher on im-

@valeg7077

4 жыл бұрын

maeve joerss this case did not even come out in my test 💀 but you never know it might come in handy

@peistillplays3578

4 жыл бұрын

@@maevejoerss1055 Discord: Pei#0001

my teacher put 2 links one was this and second was rick roll ....

Watching this for the second time - thank you so much!

I know this music lol it comes from the free adobe site when making a video lmaoo

@nickparth2124

3 жыл бұрын

😂

@domesticatedwind8984

2 жыл бұрын

do u know the name??

I dread learning about Dred Scott🤣🤣

Thank you teacher Jennifer I learned so much from this video

And, it's never been overturned by the court! The 13th and 14th Amendments only overturned limited parts of it. I like what the court had to say about the rights American's have in that decision; especially, pertaining to where they can go, when and what they may carry with them, "EVERYWHERE THEY GO"!!!

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

exactly taney and i pronounce the name correctly unlike the narrator. was right about certain things. he did have a good argument. his argement was that "slaves" are not citizens because they are property. and you can bring your property anywhere and it is still your property. it was not the supreme court's job to end slavery. that belonged to congress if you were a federalist and that belonged to the individual states if you were a democrat.

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

i'm not sure of the word he actually used but i know for damn sure he did not use the words african american in his opinion..

Thank you :)

Respect to Mr. Justice Ben Curtis! And shame on Mr. Chief Justice Taney!

Hey Mr. Burr. Hope your class is going well.

amazing!

@BillofRightsInstituteVideos

7 жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it.

Thank you Drew Scott

@iandoggies335

2 жыл бұрын

drew bruh

Taney really said: "My source was that I made it the fuck up" and won.

Wisconsin was a territory, not a state, which is an important point. The MO Comp. 1820 prohibited slavery in territories, which is why Taney deemed it unconstitutional (Congress has no power to determine laws in territories). Nevertheless, the ruling was an overstep of SC power; once Taney ruled Scott had no right to sue, the case should have been shut, yet he went on to make further rulings in order to strengthen the institution of slavery. And it's pronounced "Tawney" btw. Fun fact, Taney swore Lincoln in as president just before Lincoln bashed this decision in his inaugural address. Taney died just a couple weeks before slavery was abolished in his home state of Maryland.

@NoName-eq4fc

5 жыл бұрын

You failed to mention that Illinois was a free state in which Dred Scott also lived before he relocated to Wisconsin and sued for freedom afterwards. therefore, Congress had power to rule on the case. No need to analyze whether Wisconsin should have been a free territory or not in this case.

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

@Larkyn why’d o you think they’re here?? at least he’s smart bitch

@sydney8897

3 жыл бұрын

it literally says in article 4 of the constitution that Congress can dispose of and add and needful rules and regulations to *territories or other property* meaning they did have the power.

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

@@NoName-eq4fc taney's argument and correct argument in my opinion is that it doesn't matter what state you go to your property is still YOUR property.

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

@@sydney8897 they didn't have the power to say that because you go to a particular state or particular territory that you lose your property. your property is still yours no matter where you go.

it really helped

how do we see this descision in action?

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

you see it all the time. when you cross state lines your property is still your property and no one can change that.

@kevinpeterson346

Жыл бұрын

@@psilocybemusashi A ridiculous surmise that a state line changes ones legal status of U.S. citizen to mere property if crossing a state border , based on ones skin pigment .

What does Article IV have to do with Taney's commentary?!?

@midas5616

3 жыл бұрын

Taney ruled /believed that Congress didn't have the authority to ban slavery from the states but it states in the Article IV that Congress does have the power. simple as that, he basically violated the constitution by using his own interpretation of it

cool vid

@dsgjack5190

5 жыл бұрын

i know right?

@dsgjack5190

5 жыл бұрын

Hi Daddy what are you doing on youtube

@alxti

3 жыл бұрын

not when you are forced to watch it lmao

what

@samanthamuryasz3032

4 жыл бұрын

same i've watched it three times and still don't get it

@leahlandon8429

4 жыл бұрын

Scott thought he was free because he entered a free state. He sued. Supreme Court was like lol no you can't do that 'cuz you're black. Black people aren't citizens and can't sue. They said that Congress can't abolish slavery and stuff (which they could). Bad decision and BAM Civil War

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

@@leahlandon8429 thank you for writing my essay for me, and saving me 3 minutes of my life

This makes me think about how these innocent black people are being killed, and these cops are getting off with paid leave.

@maevejoerss1055

4 жыл бұрын

fr

@georgeray169

3 жыл бұрын

Because they don’t have a identity and nationality meaning not part of a human group making them 3/5 a human without a nation with a flag those so called blacks are aboriginal and not black because black is a color if you going to talk about complexion it called dark or light hue and copper tones Peace

@somacruz8847

2 жыл бұрын

@@georgeray169 basically the real hebrews.

Ok

but was it overruled?

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

lmfao. overrulled? no it was never overruled. it is still case law and has important clarification on property rights.

no

Ik for sure yall school giving us assignments on this can we just put the answer on the comments

@Zd_Time

6 ай бұрын

Yea

I’m here for school 😭🦟

This video says something different from all the others

bruh had to watch this crap for school

Enslaver - not master - they were not and are not dogs

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

of course they weren’t, that’s just the term they used then

dislike the music

They were not called African Americans in 1857, this why you do your genealogy today because look how they try and interchange negro, Indian, colored, black, and African American (socio political construct neither anthropological or scientific in nature according to the Office of Management and Budget l)

@carmenmercedes9903

4 жыл бұрын

Back then I don't even think they were called Human Beings!

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

@@carmenmercedes9903 we had to go over the whole constitution before thanksgiving break and I think it labeled everyone but white men “other” or something like that. women, blacks, native Americans, anyone that wasn’t the white man. sad shit

@carmenmercedes9903

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesuschrist2065 oh ok. But did you know that when Jackson was president the Native Americans had to become Christian, straight, and only have one partner at a time?

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

@@carmenmercedes9903 no, but that’s really interesting, I can use it for my report so thank you!! also, was it traditional for Native American to have 2+ partners, and if so did they all have to be of the opposite sex??

@carmenmercedes9903

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesuschrist2065 I don't know, my textbook just said they had to convert to heterosexual monogamy

If anyone wants to talk about this: Pei#0001 (discord)

@peistillplays3578

4 жыл бұрын

@Lonely GV Well, it should

@peistillplays3578

4 жыл бұрын

Pei#0001

who else is in beck junior high watching this

Walter

Hi

School bad

🥜🥜🥜

1:54 "Incorrectly..." ?? Lol.

@toniaa-y3559

4 жыл бұрын

Ralph Thompson yes.

@maevejoerss1055

4 жыл бұрын

yep, it was incorrect. keep watching the video before idiotically commenting

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

yes. he literally said right after that that taney INCORRECTLY stated African Americans have no rights

*h u h*

村民

Say Taney's name correctly. It's pronounced "tawny."

not tan-ey, its pronounced tawn, ey. But good try,

man, the music is so distracting. and so out of spirit with the context of the clip. are we celebrating???

@psilocybemusashi

Жыл бұрын

of course we are. we are celebrating our rich and incredible history. of imperfect men during trying times. these days we have such a wonderful country for blacks that we don't have to buy them from belgian merchants any longer. they will do anything to get to our wonderful free country. this case addressed important issues about property rights. these critiques of taney all focus on a certain language that they will never quote exactly because it wouldn't make sense to us in modern language they change it to imply that taney was indicating the framers of the constitution were racist and that is not wat it was. his argument that the framers accepted slavery. and they did. most of them that signed it owned slaves and considered them their property. congress had written hundreds of laws including the notorious fugitive slave act that established that slaves were property. by definition property cannot be a citizen.

I hate history

@jesuschrist2065

3 жыл бұрын

I have to watch 3 videos on this guy and not to say that it isn’t important but we’ve been going over all about slavery for the past 5 months. I know a lot more than I ever have, but my God I want to hear something else before the school year ends

@ainhoa2306

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesuschrist2065 i have a question for my homework. Was Dred Scott a slave or a free man? Why or Why not

You have no rights, only privileges.