For the casual viewer feeling like they're having trouble following along, just know that I did my master's thesis on a topic based on the AdS/CFT correspondence, and I still feel like I struggle to properly wrap my head around all of it... Kudos to PBS spacetime for fighting to make it more accessible

@MarcoLandin

Ай бұрын

I suspect even the most celebrated theoretical physicists have trouble visualizing much of this material, as it is literally in other dimensions and at infinite distances. Me, I'm just fascinated that there exist people who can figure all this stuff out. It's mind-blowing

@lethargogpeterson4083

Ай бұрын

Thank you.

@bardsamok9221

Ай бұрын

"Masters" thesis is a bit of a pretentious misnomer. There is no mastery of any subject at that level, just highly simplified understanding so naive university students can figure it out while chugging beers and playing Minecraft.

@ZakiAsir

Ай бұрын

​@@bardsamok9221 bro dropped out 💀💀💀

@fusionfan6883

Ай бұрын

@@bardsamok9221Your bitterness seems to be an emergent property of your failure to launch😵‍💫

Who else watches this weekly but has no idea what's being talked about? 🙌

@JoyThiefTheBand

Ай бұрын

Eventually, through audio osmosis, it will make some sense, lol.

@laurabutler9978

Ай бұрын

Sleep will absorb something, I hope.

@nunyabiznaz9593

Ай бұрын

I’m usually very high…

@adamwishneusky

Ай бұрын

Not always over my head but definitely this one! 😆

@ObsidianMonarch

Ай бұрын

Social engineering stickers are in place to do away with abstract thought. Meanwhile kids today wouldn't recognize #PROPAGANDA if it was advertised on KZread...

The whole “size scales lead to a third dimension” thing never made any sense no matter how hard I tried, but your example of the “effective radius” and the differing shell sizes finally made it click! Absolutely wild!

@frun

Ай бұрын

What if there is only one shell, evolving in time, so called RG time or renormalization group time?

@Exodus5K

Ай бұрын

I didn't fully understand this part. Is the idea that the system treats similarly shaped configurations at different scales similarly, and this creates nesting levels reality at different scales which subjectively is perceived as 3d? Again, I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly, but if it is then why only 3 spatial dimensions?

@anonymousaardvarkinnigeria8721

Ай бұрын

Legendary science communicators!

@maxmccann3030

Ай бұрын

My comment is @exodus

@DrDeuteron

Ай бұрын

@@Exodus5Kyes, except formally similar, not colloquially similar.

That was quite interesting. Not sure how far you really can take the analogy, but coming from an IT background, that "multiple seemingly different models describing the exact same thing" made me immediately think how you (in principle) can describe an application by giving its behavior and functionality, OR by listing its source code, OR by describing how the electricity flows through the hardware circuits. Vastly different descriptions that seem to have nothing in common, yet all describing the exact same thing. Nor can you really say which of these is the "real one" as it's more a switch in your point-of-view and which description fits your purpose. If it's anything sorta-like this, yes, makes sense. Though, always have to be careful about analogies, especially when they are of something outside your own field of expertise 🙂 but can be a useful tool when trying to understand things.

@Hyperbolic_G

Ай бұрын

This description made things click

@geoffwales8646

Ай бұрын

Also interesting to me that software is just the language encoding physical processes, so that we can manage those processes. It doesn't 'do' anything.

@SuperCharlie-fb4vw

Ай бұрын

Thanks for pointing out these dualities in IT. Your point is so interesting!

@lucascipriano1665

10 күн бұрын

It's the concept lf abstraction, when he used the analogy of 4 "pixels" clumping into a larger one to produce the same information, my head immediatly went there

Those Physicists, always projecting. 😂

@jmcooney2000

Ай бұрын

Brilliant 👏

@corgi42069

Ай бұрын

Hey-oo 😂

@EJ_WA

Ай бұрын

🤦‍♂️

@enragedares5992

Ай бұрын

😂🎉

@patbluetree4636

Ай бұрын

Well played . 😁

Hey Matt et al., I've been a viewer since y'all started back in 2015. Never commented, and I wish I had the money to join the Patreon, but I just wanted to say that I appreciate how much this series breaks my brain every week. I'm a big Brian Greene guy, and, even so, I feel as though I understand so little but love the content so much I can't stop myself from coming back. Thank you!

@pbsspacetime

Ай бұрын

thank you for your many years of support!

@batmanchurch

Ай бұрын

Q​@@pbsspacetime

@cosmnik472

Ай бұрын

R ​@@batmanchurch

@ragevsraid7703

Ай бұрын

my brain is breaking so hard i might have to take this one in parts

@richardfarland

Ай бұрын

Brian Greene is a smarmy New York ___ in comparison to Matt. There's no artiface with Matt. It's typical spartan, self deprecating Aussie delivery. With Brian, I can see his enthusiasm for teaching, but that's tarnished by the fatuous showmanship needed to pander to his Hamptons benefactors.

I understand less than 1% but I am still so happy that this dude is talking and I get to hear it.

@arsenelupiniii8040

Ай бұрын

English accent sells a lot of BS!

@BlueKitsune72

Ай бұрын

​@@arsenelupiniii8040im pretty sure that's a kiwi accent.

@moldman5694

Ай бұрын

@@arsenelupiniii8040 Australian

You know a topic is truly complex is PBS needs to make a playlist for it 😀 I mean, he explained the new paper about their possibly not being a Singularity at the center of a black hole in just one episode.

I watch this channel for ages now and usually I feel pretty smart because I understand the gist of most episodes pretty well. This episode makes me feel oldfashionedly stupid.

@ontoya1

Ай бұрын

That's exactly what I thought 😂

@nobody.of.importance

Ай бұрын

It's definitely one of the more difficult concepts in spacetime, it seems. I like to think I'm pretty good at this stuff but this whole episode was just the smell of my brain melting.

@HansStrijker

Ай бұрын

I came to the comments to write exactly this. 🤣

@das_it_mane

Ай бұрын

Which part didn't you get?

@HansStrijker

Ай бұрын

@@das_it_mane Yes. Well not entirely true. I understood the solar eclipse shirt section.

Can't wait to get reminded again next time why this is the best channel I've ever discovered.

@ericdavison6186

Ай бұрын

Have you got a minute? 😊

@Awesomes007

Ай бұрын

Yeah. It's unreasonably effective.

@arsenelupiniii8040

Ай бұрын

Brittish accent! Makes people feel smarter, when in reality it is ALL bs!

This is the first video that seems to have actually succeeded in getting me to understand the whole concept of the Holographic principle.

First heard of Erik Verlinde’s entropic gravity/holographic universe theory probs 7-8yrs. ago in the context of him arguing that dark matter/energy are so difficult to detect bc they don’t actually exist, but rather are emergent products of space time geometry-it was so elegant & intuitive that I was sold then & there 👀

@lordemed1

Ай бұрын

'Everything we know., or will know will ultimately be emergent

@grayshadowglade

Ай бұрын

I had exactly the same reaction from his lectures on it. The math isn't perfect because it challenges existing assumptions but the concepts are incredibly elegant.

When I watch PBS Space Time, I really do think I should be outside bashing rocks together

@arsenelupiniii8040

Ай бұрын

Brittish accent has always had that effect. They sell a ton a crap that way.

@JK7H

Ай бұрын

Reject physics, return to the wild

@LeeLynch1

Ай бұрын

@@arsenelupiniii8040 He doesn't have a British accent :)

As somebody who majored in the humanities because I am allergic to math, I'm amazed by how much I've learned from this channel. I never thought I would understand so many of these principles, even on a surface level.

@OllamhDrab

Ай бұрын

Heehee. Sometimes the ability to calculate or do math isn't the same skill as comprehending or teaching the material conceptually. Probably why I'm not in science as a career though, good with concepts and communication, would be miserable about all the mental effort it takes for me to memorize things or keep numbers straight. A Relativity class teacher once made this clear, being like, "You're the only one in the class that understands the material, but you remember two times three is six, right?" Oops. :)

@michaelearnest1983

Ай бұрын

Well, according to the video, if you understand something on a surface level, then you understand it completely!

@davidwright8432

Ай бұрын

I think you aren't allergic to math, at all. You're rightly allergic to badly taught math. A depressing amount of K-12 math is dismally badly taught.

@clarkthomas354

Ай бұрын

So basically we really don't know how the universe works.

@WREFMAN

Ай бұрын

@@OllamhDrabheehee

Great episode! I watched all the old holographic principle episodes when they first came out and they were mind-blowing but very heavy and hard to follow. You did an incredible job summarising and re-explaining the whole thing here in simpler terms.

I can't help seeing our true source selves dance on the cosmic Plato's cave wall, where the story is flipped, the shadows are the casters of players, not the other way around. The projector is inside the cave, made from the soup of fundamental shadow code, projecting an emergent representation that we consider... ...Reality. Additional: Science channels like this have filled a void within me, thank you for projecting some wonderful education and perspectives my way

I totally understood all that

@ColeDedhand

Ай бұрын

Yes, so did I. Absolutely.

@enragedares5992

Ай бұрын

I now have a complete understanding 😊 ...... of what a person who does not speak English experiences when watching a video in English 😂

@ShippyJack

Ай бұрын

Great, could one of you guys summarize it for me in your own words? Cause I have no sweet clue!!!

@rackmarkus

Ай бұрын

@@ShippyJack42

@LuisSierra42

Ай бұрын

@@ShippyJack star trek

Dang, I didn't notice it on the last episode but the new credits visuals and music are incredible!

I'm very excited to see you guys picking this topic back up! Looking forward to this series.

Yay! This one was complex enough that it will require revisiting! 🎉🎉

As a layman that likes thinking about these topics but lacks the terminology, and in depth study, I find this channel uniquely inspiring. Keep up the good work, I might share this channel if it's alright.

Always a pleasure listening to Matt. He structures the concept in a understable method and doesn't dumb it down. Moreover, he provides the definition and notations; to keep up. Either to learn or to brush up . Cant wait to hear the reast of this series.

@NontrivialZetaZeros

Ай бұрын

He does dumb it down, sorry.

@sakismpalatsias4106

Ай бұрын

@@NontrivialZetaZeros yes obviously. But this is still a 15 min podcast; at best. Not the lecture itself. He is still tailored towards a specific audience. I mean how many people actually understand what a boundary or bulk is. Entanglement of the field, Lorenz transformation in QFT.

@phelan8385

Ай бұрын

​@@NontrivialZetaZerosit's simplified, not dumbed down.

finally back to headache content, thanks

i usually get most episodes but this one Im gonna have to re-watch lol

This channel never fails to blow my mind

My most favourite astrophysics presenter!

Aw Matt! It's been a while since you did one of your 'deep dives' into a subject. They are what first found me your channel way back when. Looking forward to seeing this one through :)

Extremely excited for this series of upcoming episodes!!

Oh finally! A Spacetime video about entropic gravity is coming up! Can't wait for that one.

Never look directly at a solar eclipse tshirt

@tylerknight99

Ай бұрын

I hope Spacetime sells me ISO 12312-2 certified sunglasses so I can decide if I want to buy the shirt

@arsenelupiniii8040

Ай бұрын

Never listen directly to brittish accent, lest you wanna buy some BS!

@jesuschrist2284

Ай бұрын

@@arsenelupiniii8040 what about australian or newzealand accents?

Great episode! Your explanations and the artist’s depictions make a formidable combination. Looking forward to the next ones you teased!

So glad you’re covering this topic now. Can’t wait for the next episodes and really hoping you’ll dig into more of the machinery explaining the why and how.

Short answer: Yes Long Answer: Yes but longer

@adamb89

Ай бұрын

Right answer: Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees.

@GeorgeJoubert-id2cv

Ай бұрын

@@adamb89 no

@corgi42069

Ай бұрын

​@@adamb89 it's more like "yeeeeeeeeeeessssss....?"

@Aragorn7884

Ай бұрын

That's what she said? 🤔😏

@BasicPsychology101

Ай бұрын

😆

Its PBS Space Time O Clock folks

Back with a bang! Somehow I understood this recap better than the individual episodes. Maybe I have levelled up or this channel has :) What a duality!

I've always been fascinated by this particular concept of the holographic universe, ever since it was first proposed in our modern understanding of physics. I'm very happy that it has gotten such a great explainer in a readily accessible video. You have done such a great job explaining so many concepts that I find so enjoyable to listen. It's like listening to one of your favorite stories, only this time told by one of the greatest orators and storytellers, it is just simply a pleasure)

The best explanation of CFT and the Holographic Principle I have ever seen is Raphael Bousso’s

Reminds me of an experience I had once on Salvia Divinorum. Great video and explanation!

@tatearnold5050

Ай бұрын

Please share more!

I love that PBS spacetime is becoming more advanced and using info taught in past videos to create a basis for new complex videos. Its like a class I've made it to the end of somehow.

you are an amazing communicator. not sure theres anyone else on the platform with such skill

So what I got from this is a black hole all along has been that last little spot seen when old tvs were turned off.

Alright you did it Matt. I usually loosely follow (definitely not fully understand) a good 80% of what you talk about. This one was definitely under 50%. But please keep doing it. This is why we watch your videos. I'm going to watch the previous series on the holographic principle then re-watch this.

@TheJohnmmullin

Ай бұрын

Leonard Susskind has several good talks that explain this more easily. “Easily”.

@Josh-mu7qy

Ай бұрын

@@TheJohnmmullin lol I have seen them. He doesn't even attempt to dumb down. Granted he's typically speaking to colleagues.

@TheJohnmmullin

Ай бұрын

@@Josh-mu7qy the math heavy talks (Stanford lectures, etc) I literally do not understand word one. He might as well be speaking in another language (which, in fact, he is). His black hole war talks are much more accessible - I grasped almost 10% 😂😂

@Josh-mu7qy

Ай бұрын

@@TheJohnmmullin his talks on quantum entanglement and black hole entanglement are incredible. It's literally his theory and I've never heard anyone else talk about it. Would love for Matt to do an episode.

@TheJohnmmullin

Ай бұрын

@@Josh-mu7qy surely there’s an episode on it?

Thanks Matt! This episode gave me some useful new terminology. True dualities and approximate dualities, super useful

Best video in a long while for me. Been trying to understand this, this really helped.

Emergent gravity is the most important concept in modern physics, and most likely the true path to the theory of everything!!! Thanks so much for covering this Matt et al.!!! I am beside myself waiting for the next episodes! I sincerely hope you guys can shed some light on how the implications of ER=EPR and emergent gravity can reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics WITHOUT invoking this fictitious "dark matter" stuff ;)

@lordemed1

Ай бұрын

there will never be a theory of everything. Bet the house on that.

@grayshadowglade

Ай бұрын

@@lordemed1 Oh I disagree heartily... there is a theory of everything out there, we just probably aren't going to like it whole lot when we find it. 🙂

Quantum entanglement across many scales. Can't wait for that episode!

@frun

Ай бұрын

It may be, that there is only one shell, evolving in time. Your motion through the shells in radial direction gives the appearance of time - quantum entanglement. In this sense galaxies are past us.

@9:30 This is like the image pyramids we use in computer vision. It's cool to see the analogs of concepts popping up in different places

Granted I've had a few drinks but this is the first episode for a while where it's been completely over my head. Not that my PhD was ever in physics to begin with.

It seems less like we are moving to the future, but that the future is pulling us towards it in a fundamental way that affects the present.

@EleneDOM

Ай бұрын

I sometimes have a feeling like that, almost as if we are being physically pulled. I wonder if it's meaningful....

@grayshadowglade

Ай бұрын

That's not a bad way of thinking about it. I like to think of it as the 'Now' falling into the 'Future' faster than the 'Past' can keep up. So we get this lovely illusion of a 3d reality within the 'Now' as we observe it's 'Past' like a wake on a cosmic sea.

@Om92OneMedia

Ай бұрын

@bobjason7540 , the branch of philosophy called Teleology builds out frameworks supporting the hypothesis you state here... Not that I've really dug into Teleology all that much, (yet)...

@giordano5787

23 күн бұрын

Yea​@@EleneDOM

Kinda off-topic: Just read about the newly observed dark galaxy "Nube" which seems to be a highly challenging observation with regards to dark matter models, which have been discussed just recently on this channel... Might be a video opportunity for an update! Anyway, great content as always Spacetime! :)

So love how he still keeps the ending like you can feel any moment now he's about to say "Space Time" as I usually say it at my screen lol.

Been a while since I've watched, I love your new intro!! 💜

Funny, I just recently watched one of your earlier episodes where you touched upon the topic. The AdS/CFT correspondence is one of the most interesting topics in physics.

What's with the foreboding background chord...?

@ringledinglebingle

Ай бұрын

Really though. I can’t concentrate on anything he’s saying because of it.

@kaia9154

Ай бұрын

I'm having a hard time focusing on the video because of this as well :(

@richardconway6425

Ай бұрын

I think it's intended to make us feel even more insignificant and lost in this vast universe than we already are.

@rexmundi2986

Ай бұрын

Was that on purpose? I thought it was some kind of ghastly feedback, or audio artifact or something. Pretty distracting.

@Crootcovitz

Ай бұрын

Was it always there? I think there was always some background sound there, but this one is particularly distracting.

Nice, pretty much what I was thinking, about emergence and entanglement and information theories. Excited for this upcoming series

Got damn PBS, you guys have been around forever, glad to see you still here.

exciting stuff on the horizon !

I think we continue to misunderstand space altogether. From the fact that a spin 1/2 particle needs 720 degs of rotation to come back to its starting point, to the fact that entropy is proportional to area, and that the area of a one plank volume sphere is 4 plank areas. Also, that the "stiffness" of spacetime, that defines how fast gravitational waves move through it is related, in an unknown way, the the permeability and permittivity of space. We are missing something very fundamental, IMHO, and when we find it, we'll no doubt to a face-palm.

@tim40gabby25

Ай бұрын

"do a face palm" so annoying when the punchline gets scrowed :)

@seadog8807

Ай бұрын

Oddly enough, was watching the episode wondering if spinners would be a useful topological description in navigating a holographic dimension.

@davidhand9721

Ай бұрын

Something I wish I was told a lot earlier about spinors: they are not geometric objects. They are transformations. You can stop wracking your brain trying to picture them; they just are not living in physical XYZ space. I highly recommend the series "Spinors for Beginners" by Eigenchris here on KZread. You can understand them perfectly well without any modification to your understanding of space.

@davidhand9721

Ай бұрын

To clarify, rotating a spinor 360 degrees turns its object all the way around, but the spinor itself is its opposite. The additional full turn leaves the spinor and the object both as they were.

@ozzymandius666

Ай бұрын

@@davidhand9721 The experiment has been done with electrons. Electrons transform as spinors, under SU(2), as opposed to SO(3).

This is a fascinating episode with just the right presentation level. Thanks. I am looking forward to more episodes on this subject

Great Episode! Reminds me of the things Wolfram Physics is starting show - i.e. space as an emergent property of entangled computation. I'm not a physicist so hopefully I got that right. But I'd love to see you guys do an explainer on Wolfram Physics some day.

*reaches for the Aspirin bottle*

It seems that the more we unravel the fundamental tangles of reality, the more knots appear to confound us.

I've been waiting for you guys to cover this topic for 10 years. This is the true bleeding edge of quantum gravity

This reminds me of smooth functions, green’s theorem, and differential equations; where some properties of a function over a region are reflected in other properties of that function on the region’s boundary

we are just the result of Azathoth having a bad dream after to much spicy food

@DObscura-yi5es

Ай бұрын

Ol' Az is gonna have an existential crisis when it realizes it's just a lonely Boltzman Brain

@nessuno5403

Ай бұрын

Vindaloo?

@mattneville6601

Ай бұрын

Too much

@hungrycrab3297

Ай бұрын

@@DObscura-yi5es That boltzman brain will be shook when it realizes it's just a simulation

@skateboardingjesus4006

Ай бұрын

Ah, a product of Azathoth's slumbering brain on spicy food? I'm glad our origins aren't from his gastrointestinal agitation.

I just wrote a paper on the stack about how the space between dark lines in the Double Slit experiment can be changed by what material you make the Slits from. And the dark lines aren't lines, they are a piece of a circle. Great presentation.

@subliminalvibes

Ай бұрын

As a holographer, I am constantly fighting circular diffraction patterns and interference.

@billschwandt1

Ай бұрын

@@subliminalvibes what's a holographer?

@TlalocTemporal

Ай бұрын

​@@billschwandt1-- I assume someone tmakes holograms.

@quillaja

Ай бұрын

@@billschwandt1 photograph : photographer :: holograph : holographer

@subliminalvibes

Ай бұрын

@@billschwandt1 like a photographer, but I make holograms with lasers. Are you familiar with holograms and how they relate to laser interference?

I'm just some uneducated dude, but through life, I have had theories and the more time passes the more those theories are being taken seriously, this is one of them!

It would be really neat if you guys could include references in the description field. It saves me looking around for them. Thanks for the great content. Keep up the excellent work.

Completely off-topic but a question I had: If bosons can be occupy the same space, and the W and Z bosons are more massive than even iron atoms, and we know that you can create a black hole from concentrating photons... Can W and/or Z bosons create a black hole if too many of them accidentally overlap? How many W/Z bosons would you need to accidentally make this black hole (even a small one)? And is this at all likely to accidentally occur?

@kindlin

Ай бұрын

The trouble is manipulating W/Z bosons into any actual location. They exist on such short timescales, you can do almost nothing more than identify their brief existence.

I'm fairly well versed in physics, but this episode... I'm gonna have to study a bit to actually get it

Great videos. Always interesting to watch and contemplate.

That melted my brain a little, I see the integral of a sphere from radius 0 to radius 1 (the size of the universe). But the effective pixel thing I didn't get.

Your universe is the projection I put on at night when my child goes to sleep. It gets turned off every morning and turned back on at 8pm in my dimension.

Theoretical physicist: i have done enough drugs to create a new theory

@kenbohlin1642

Ай бұрын

The spice must flow.

@DrDeuteron

Ай бұрын

@@kenbohlin1642mescaline. Spice doesn’t make theories.

@pakarpintu4917

Ай бұрын

Jedi : may force be with you Gravity : but i'm not force Jedi : f#ck #ff

@angelmendez-rivera351

Ай бұрын

@@DrDeuteron Don't underestimate spice.

@arsenelupiniii8040

Ай бұрын

Like Miccheo Cookoo! That guys hair is more interesting than Neil Degrasse Tyson's PTSD!

Kudos for the animator trying to visualise emergent space!

its been a while since i could actually understand what this series has been talking about, but i still enjoy hearing about it

My head.... I was not ready for this.

@pandapower5902

Ай бұрын

It was sooo confusing and weird

I need a PhD to even remotely understand this......make another episode like this lol

10:35 that animation is so sweet and cool!

Emergent properties are always fascinating to me and this was even more interesting than I expected. It's like bulk emerging from something(s) with entropy in aggregate. I obviously can't begin to imagine how this could be tested

It feels like gravity may turn out to be the result of standing wave nodes on the surface of a blackhole which we are the projection of. Basically, Faraday waves on the boundary and we are on a sheet of time falling towards the singularity while everything we look out towards appears to be expanding. Entanglement would be the result of these nodes as they are created by a single wavefunction on the surface and are the result of all wave functions interacting to create the effect of nodes and anti-nodes. It would suggest the CMB is actually the Event horizon we are looking back towards and using it we should be able to calculate various properties of the blackhole we are in. The CMB is so uniform as things reach maximum entropy right before falling in.

@Fangman123789

Ай бұрын

Wait, so could that also explain why we see the beginning of the universe as infinitely/extremely dense and ours is not dense in comparison? Causing us to believe our universe started off that way when it was really just the projection from the other plane and ours has a different "beginning state" that would give us different constants possibly? Where ours as it became a supermassive blackhole the total density dropped? Or am I talking nonsense, because I admit the holographic universe and this holographic boundary concept is above me, whereas usually I feel with or above the curve a little on most concepts on this channel. Could that concept you said also implicate that due to the observance of multiple black holes, would that basically be the multiverse theory in a half true manner? Except rather than concept of all possible outcomes existing and infinitely varying universal constants instead you have multiple very similar universes due to them all being black holes. Also, would the predicted ratio of matter to antimatter, and its slight imbalance, at the creation of the universe still be a relevant meaaurement? If so, I wonder in what way it would manifest itself within the concept of reality you said. Again, sorry if these are dumb questions, Im struggling with some of these concepts lol, but it weirdly feels good. The more contradictions with our theories we find with the JWST and the harder to conceptualize these topics become the giddier it makes me, for so long I think many casual followers (or maybe just myself 😅) of theoretical physics, astrophysics, astronomy, etc have felt like many of the mysteries were solved, like we were almost done or close to the final step lol. But our knowledge is like an expanding circle, as we grow the circumference of our knowledge we exponentially increase the volume of our ignorance 😂. I stole that from somewhere and probably paraphrased it crappy but you get the gist.

Please provide links to the holographic principle episodes in the description here. They aren’t all named in a way that would show up in a single keyword search.

This reminds me very much of a basic property of differentiable complex functions in complex analysis. If a complex function is "holomorphic" on a region - that is to say, it can be differentiated at every point both within that region as well as on the region boundary - then in fact the behavior on the boundary _alone_ is _sufficient_ to describe the entire interior behavior. The one-dimensional boundary, fills in all the details of the two-dimensional space inside it.

Would love to see you look into the physicist Nassim Haramein. This is exactly the thing he is working on. His scaling law and work on the Swartzenchild proton papers are very acclaimed and would seem a perfect fit for this channel. Hopefully you see this. I love this channel!

I have often found answers to ultimate questions lacking because in my mind, you can’t give answers if you haven’t even determined the appropriate questions. The questions posed in this video finally satisfy me as ultimate questions to be asking

I wonder if every conversation Matt has ends with him saying the word "spacetime" 😄

@expred

Ай бұрын

"I'll see you again soon, in another distant corner of this grocery-store's intergalactic... spacetime".

Hi Matt, great video! Can't wait for the next ones that continue the holographic story!

Brilliant! As an architect i love thinking about the interplay between dimensions. The notion that materialization in 3 dimensions could emerge from infinitely scaling information surfaces... Like onion skins... Is amazing. Thank you for such a coherent explanation

The holographic principle feels like Stoke’s theorem on coke

We observe the universe in the present moment (wave function collapse) surrounded by the observable therefore, predictable past (general relativity) moving towards the unobserved therefore, probabilistic future (quantum mechanics).

@binbots

Ай бұрын

@@acajoom I never claimed this is how reality actually works. Merely how we perceive it.

I usually pride myself on being able to follow these pretty well, but this one was pretty thick. It might need to watch it a few more times for it to click.

make a video about d-0 branes of which all space can consist

I propose the wolographic principle, where spacetime emerges from the devoted prayers of monks on a 2D map

@EvsEntps

Ай бұрын

😶‍🌫️: WOLOLOOOOO🕛🕧🕐🕜🕑🕝🕒🕞🕓🕟🕔🕠🕕🕡🕖🕢🕗🕣🕘🕤🕙🕥🕚🕦🌌☀️🌑🌕🌖🌗🌘🌍🌎🌏🌋🗻🏔⛰️🌊🦠🌿🌳🪼🐟🐊🦕☄️🦫🐒🦧🚶‍♂️‍➡️🛖🏘🏰🏭🚗🛩🚀🛰🪐!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

@robertjones9598

Ай бұрын

Waluigraphic?

@EvsEntps

Ай бұрын

I propose a rival theory: the Ayoyographic principle.

@dinocore1

Ай бұрын

Wololo

Cool new intro!

Fantastic visuals and script, as always!

I hope Matt will do an episode about the recent JWST confirmation that the Universe is indeed expanding at different rates.

@BeamMonsterZeus

Ай бұрын

Mass distribution is far from uniform, so certainly the forces which act upon the boundary of universal space-time are a graduation of relative energies. There is a logical explanation just sitting right there.

If wormholes were real wouldn't the gravity at One end pull on the other. They'd be unstable close less then anano nano second so not light would get through and stretched and contracted in so many different directions affects on light would be cancelled out. But paths of gravitational bodies would be altered areas of gravity would be linked much closer then would other wise

I met Erik Verlinde at a Dark Matter presentation at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore thanks to my wife. One can expand on this understanding by cross-referencing his data with thousands of Boolean searches. This shows that the Bunch-Davies vacuum promotes the generation of entropy, which can be calculated within the ADS/CFT framework using the Ryu-Takayanagi proposal. This is especially clear when considering the modes that exit the horizon during inflation and contribute to the cosmic microwave background as it is today.

@nessuno5403

Ай бұрын

Wow! Any idea why aliens like to probe?

@MCsCreations

Ай бұрын

​@@nessuno5403 They're pervers.

@EmeraldEyesEsoteric

Ай бұрын

No darkmatter, darkenergy, you will never find it. Electric Universe for the win.

@jsmythib

Ай бұрын

Please forward 3 Advil to my address :)

@UnshavenStatue

Ай бұрын

hey, i once took a class from shinsei ryu!

I find it pretty interesting how physics and psychology are connected in the methodological aspects of measurement. As a psychometrician, I like to say that we're trying to model a completely dark room by touch alone, without any external validation.

I love this channel and want to learn this stuff but I always fall asleep in my chair watching them.