I learned about DNA nucleotides and the genetic code embedded in the sequence of the four types of nucleotides waaay back in Catholic high school. Because belief in God was pre-supposed there, the connection between a code and a Designer was implicit. As a future bio major, now long ago completed, I never accepted that this was the result of a random process. It takes an inordinately larger to leap of faith to accept that fiction than it does to believe in God. Occam's Razor almost demands acceptance of the existence of a Designer in this entire process. So many of us can't see that, perhaps because we don't want to.

@markl8679

2 ай бұрын

If you want to use Occam’s razor then you’d better leave out the most complicated thing ever imagined……….. ur god.

@eazyrat

2 ай бұрын

​@@markl8679lol

@sophiacristina

2 ай бұрын

@@markl8679 The most complicated thing ever imagined is the idea that "nothing" made creation. And, in before "no, we say we don't know", you guys know the third law of motion and the law of conservation of energy. In before the "no atheist said that", yes, Dawkins, Hawking and his mate believes that.

@joshua2707

2 ай бұрын

It's nice to see another biologist here. I couldn't accept it either when I saw firsthand how ridiculously improbable, even considering the universe's age, it would be to create even one of these biomolecules.

@DM-dk7js

2 ай бұрын

Absurd use of Occam’s razor.

Some of us DID learn this by paying attention in school while others were too busy mocking us for being nerds.

@user-hr8dx9qw4n

Ай бұрын

So ODIN made that? I knew it , we see in Valhalla.

@Ari-gold

Ай бұрын

@@user-hr8dx9qw4n great example of an idiot who didn’t pay attention in school😂😂😂😂

@MinistryofMen

Ай бұрын

Or going to church.

@wingchunkungfuwins

Ай бұрын

You learned a bunch of lies. We are created.

@AdamHarte

Ай бұрын

​@@wingchunkungfuwinsby an angry invisible man in the sky? Who is all powerful, says you have free choice, but knows what will happen, so there is no such thing as free choice, and still gives babies bone cancer. If there is a creator, then he is horrible, and nobody should trust that immoral being

I met Francis Crick. when I was a new grad. I got his autograph on my in my textbook, the same pic the video shows. It's a good memory.

@tihanaharrison6728

Ай бұрын

A friend of mine had Jim Watson sign her textbook when she was a PhD student in the UK.

@bellastone-le9eb

Ай бұрын

What an amazing memory to have! Wow. ❤

@smillstill

Ай бұрын

I met a biochemistry professor who stole a base off one of Watson's and Crick's original metal DNA models and then actually got both Watson and Crick to sign it. He showed it to me when I was visiting the Graduate School he worked at.

@matthewriegner5180

Ай бұрын

My grandparents would have Watson and Crick over for Christmas parties. My grandfather did a bunch of research on viruses and part of his research got tossed over to W&C which lead to their discovery of the double helix. I have some of his old models of a DNA molecule that were made put of wood.

@BeautyWithTiffy

Ай бұрын

And he’s been proven to be a fraud. He get all the work from the woman researcher who had her own team. Go back and do your history figure out who she was. We just dumb down millions of people across the globe giving these guys credits and now it has been debunked that they stole the information they didn’t discover anything they were SCAMMERS thieves

My grandfather was a biochemist and the smartest man I personally knew. At his funeral after one my uncles told the preacher adamantly my grandfather was not religious, my grandfather's cousin walked up. He then told us how he remembered my grandfather progressing through college and through his doctorate. At one point when back home, he said my grandfather told him the more he learned through the sciences, he realized how truly amazing and spectacular God really is...

@cliveburrows6071

Ай бұрын

Amen

@thomasknudsen3686

Ай бұрын

Stories

@markrusso8546

Ай бұрын

The question is - why do you have to be religious (man made religion) to believe in God?

@GatchamanG4

Ай бұрын

Hallelujah!!

@glennriquito381

Ай бұрын

@@markrusso8546 You don't. Nobody who is truly close to God participates in religion. Religion is merely a commercial racket that attempts to package and sell faith in God. It is often assumed, erroneously, that those who are not involved with religion don't believe in God -- when in reality those who believe in God simply have no use for religion. Read in the Bible, Romans chapter 8, for a better understanding of how God deals directly with those who love him.

I learned that about DNA in high school. What is amazing to me is how bad the schools have become.

@emeralff881

Ай бұрын

I’m in high school right now and I had a test on this exact material last week. Not all schools are bad these days 👍

@elisekuby2009

Ай бұрын

Exactly! How primitive schools and educators have become.

@HaotoAnimeOnPiano

Ай бұрын

Older educational systems didn't have this. People need to realize that our education is updated every decade, and is different for every country. The comments are basically gaslighting the older generation, even when they love learning. This is incredibly condescending.

@rumoara

Ай бұрын

Schools aren't bad bro the students now are crap, they don't give a damn and nothing motivates them to learn unless you reward them with some cash

@davidchang5265

Ай бұрын

Schools teach it today, its just that students pay attention less now

Your school may not have taught this, but mine did. I remember one of the best teachers we had saying "We have to teach you the basics that will allow you to grow as a person. So let's talk about one of the most basic things that enables life" His lesson was for 90 minutes. Felt like 5. Thank you Mr Goodwin.

@dusfitz

Ай бұрын

Had a teacher just like this. Mr Lueck, 8th grade science. He made everything interesting and went above and beyond to make sure we all understood the basics of Bio and physics at the highest level.

@aclark903

Ай бұрын

My High school biology teacher showed me a letter he had from David Attenborough attacking him for asking questions that David clearly didn’t want to answer about evolution..(the evil solution!)

@mariegraziano3403

Ай бұрын

Mankind HAS known about this. But if we fully understand DNA, we would also understand that what we are given as medicine, doesn’t actually cure anything, and in most cases, cause WAY MORE problems, and we wouldn’t agree to pay for them. So there go all of the libraries and schools.

@thisiscarib

Ай бұрын

Bars ✊🏿👏🏿🖖🏿

@MusicismoreImportant

Ай бұрын

Which grade

Who didn’t learn DNA is encoded in school?

@contempt4u

Ай бұрын

People who chose different subjects. My high school let us chose our subjects . I did maths and physics, not biology or chemistry.

@sebassanchezc-1379

Ай бұрын

@@contempt4u that's dumb. No kid should have that option. Kids should learn the 4 subjects

@contempt4u

Ай бұрын

@sebassanchezc-1379 also did English, accounting and a computer class., only so much time in a day, can't do every subject available.

@contempt4u

Ай бұрын

@sebassanchezc-1379 blame the Australian education system 35 years ago.

@onesolopolo4194

Ай бұрын

@@contempt4u weird, im 36 and in NZ we learned this early, way before science class splintered into different optional topics.

“What shocks me the most is how this existed for thousands of years before it was discovered” yeah that’s how discoveries work they existed before we discovered them

@RobJFalcon

Ай бұрын

LOL Someone tell this guy that there's things we haven't discovered yet. It'll likely blow his mind.

@zenout3463

Ай бұрын

lol they didn’t exist for thousands of years. Billions more like it. Before humans were ever born/made/created/programmed into being/insert other potential.

@Trollificusv2

Ай бұрын

Also, "thousands of years"??? Whoa!!

@A_Stereotypical_Heretic

Ай бұрын

Probably more like billions 😂​@@Trollificusv2

@A_Stereotypical_Heretic

Ай бұрын

He said THAT is what blows his mind the most... 🤦

You did learn this in school. You just weren't paying attention.

@satanslayer9320

Ай бұрын

Public schools don't teach that the code in DNA required a "MIND" and the impossibility of the code arising from natural, physical processes. Public schooling about the evolution of DNA boils down to, "Blow up a forest and the result is a fully built house."

@patricekanagy5898

Ай бұрын

I learned it in honors biology.

@patricekanagy5898

Ай бұрын

In high school.

@purpleking6678

Ай бұрын

That would explain why he sits there plagiarizing content for money

@mattmarzula

Ай бұрын

​@@purpleking6678he also gets his mind blown thinking that DNA only existed for thousands of years.

It's always those who flunked school who stumble onto half an idea later and think they found something all the scientists missed.

@PLF...

Ай бұрын

And still get it wrong

@frankroquemore4946

Ай бұрын

Dude that’s like me telling my family a few months ago “Hey did you know that Myth Busters guy was actually a prop maker for Hollywood??” 😂 they looked at me like “uh yeah that’s like his whole thing”

@davidlittle7182

Ай бұрын

Agree. I know someone who talks about ‘alternative theories’ who has not bothered to understand conventional wisdom

@daveo2431

Ай бұрын

I know, right? That's something I dislike about these shorts, they just recycle information known by anyone who takes the time to learn it, and make it like new knowledge, especially without giving due credit. They teach this even in physiology and, of course, in biology.

@jasminebarratt1809

Ай бұрын

Hey don't knock intuition, it saved my health and my life.

We did. You weren’t paying attention.

@nellokiko6755

Ай бұрын

Exactly

@user-kl2jg9ve3v

Ай бұрын

Everyone thinks there are these secrets people are keeping, when in reality they were playing on their phones and dozing off during class. 😂

@enigma9971

Ай бұрын

Did they mention that it being made from some big bang must be preposterous? Yes or no.

@johnnycashblacknc

Ай бұрын

@user-kl2jg9ve3v we didn't have phones when I went to school and they never taught this in my school. I was paying attention 😒

@That.Guy.

Ай бұрын

At the end he says that DNA has been around for thousands of years lol wait until he hears about the dinosaurs

The mainstream’s evolution theory is like saying Microsoft and all its software started with a big bang and then it self evolved as needed for the users. Life is brought to us by intelligent design.

@lynnsavron7949

Ай бұрын

Well stated!

@joshrandall3632

Ай бұрын

Good analogy.

@Ralyx0

Ай бұрын

What a terrible analogy. Computer code does not self-replicate or mutate. Y'know, the two necessary cornerstones of any evolutionary process.

@joshrandall3632

Ай бұрын

@@Ralyx0 If you aren't smart enough to understand the analogy, you're just proving his point.

@atheistangel007

Ай бұрын

No, it just means you have no idea what you are talking about. Even the Catholic church accepts the fact of evolution.

I have never doubted a Creator. The complexities of nature and humans are amazing ❤

@atheistangel007

Ай бұрын

Are, so you are suggesting that everything exists is too complicated to have not been "created", right? Surely then this "creator" has to be more complicated than its creation right? Then it stands to reason that is something complex requires a "creator", and if the creator is logically more complex than its creation, then logically this creator requires a creator. Cue infinite regression.

@phi4721

Ай бұрын

@@atheistangel007 why do you care if people believe in God?

@doreenb.8928

15 күн бұрын

@@atheistangel007 And? The “who created God, then?,” question is tricky but doesn’t make the thoroughly improbable true-that all this wonderful and specific complexity sprang into being and then evolved so uniquely and specifically. Just human eyes, or any eyes for that matter, or the human family structure tells us that we have a Creator. Not to mention sacred geometry…

@atheistangel007

14 күн бұрын

@@phi4721 Do you know what Project 2025 is?

@atheistangel007

14 күн бұрын

@doreenb.8928 Existence is not "thoughly improbable", it's just not understood by many, that then choose to stick their favorite god into the gaps of their knowledge rather than educate themselves, or just admit there are things they don't know. The eye is not evidence of any "creator", it is far too flawed.

They definitely taught this is high schools in Tanzania. In depth, too.

@allenvayner4987

Ай бұрын

Soon, there is going to be the rapture. It's when there will be trumpet sounds, and after the trumpet sounds, God will lift his people from here. Also, God said people should be living by the Bible. Amen, and God bless ❤* John 3:16 - "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him shall not perish but have eternal life". ❤

@jdestrada6281

Ай бұрын

They teach it everywhere. Kids just don’t pay attention.

@notimportant3686

Ай бұрын

@@allenvayner4987 hahahaha... imaginary world people are funny

@user-xy8qk9gz7g

Ай бұрын

@@notimportant3686 It seems that it’s about someone’s flooding attack and the songs that they sang.

@deekj3860

Ай бұрын

I intend to teach it tomorrow in a village school in Nigeria tomorrow😜

All programmers worldwide understand that codes are not the result of chance.

@simonpaintsunday2377

2 ай бұрын

Unfortunately, it doesn't stop some of them from becoming atheists.

@ronaldmorgan7632

2 ай бұрын

Yep

@sophiacristina

2 ай бұрын

Yes, and all programmers knows that random never did anything complex, that generative models are mostly hard coded, that the law of large numbers and Bernoulli's trial shows that chance converges to an average and never goes to extremes. Any programmer would also know that if you make a syntax dictionary and use random to try to make a program at random, it would never do something complex.

@generichuman_

2 ай бұрын

@@sophiacristina generative models are mostly hardcoded!?! tell me you have no idea what you're talking about without telling me that you have no idea what you're talking about...

@sophiacristina

2 ай бұрын

@@generichuman_ It is, you have random only to join objects together, the object itself and its data are hard coded. We can see in AI how ChatGPT have lot of prompts. That when GANs fail to do something, you have to write a specific code for it to stop failing. If you let generative models to run by itself, it only makes noise. That is why the best codes for such things are mostly filled with hard coded fix. An AI that explore a maze and collect items got stuck watching an animated screen because it was rewarding it, how they fixed that? Hard coded it... Another that was playing an Atari game had problem in memorizing the aspects of the level it wandered and which had resources for the AI to complete the game... How they fixed it? They hard coded the AI memorization procedure. Tell me you have no idea about what you are talking about without telling me you have no idea.

Literally learned this in a public high school in biology

Even Watson and Quick admitted that DNA is not a random coincidence. Only a creator can mastermind this

@KushMyCologneee

Ай бұрын

Where is the evidence for the creator?

@lea-andromeda-sol2333

Ай бұрын

@@KushMyCologneee In your DNA codan...DNA = Do Not Alter, RNA = Remain Not Altered

@laurelmorris6995

Ай бұрын

@@KushMyCologneee Just open your eyes and look around you at the creation - then ponder it. One example of millions: How many millions of years did it take for the human womb to evolve???? If it did, how come we are all here???? Evolutionary thinking is totally illogical and irrational. God has given you a mind to think and reason with. People who don't think and ponder these things are not very intelligent human beings. They have switched off the most incredible apparatus given to them by God and only living a fraction of their lives.

@timmoore3188

Ай бұрын

Who made the creator then? Such an elaborate all-knowing mind couldn't have come about by accident, could it?.

@guspapadopoulos

Ай бұрын

@@KushMyCologneee Obviously that's always been the great question. Where did God come from. From a rational, secular, perspective it's very hard to explain as we are conditioned to view evidence from empirical knowledge, quanta, DNA, evolution, explosions of what Carl Sagan use to say, ";star stuff". We as humans regardless of how far we have come on the intellectual circle. God is so far beyond our comprehension of how and why, that the best answer l can give is that there is knowledge way, way beyond the rational, logical answers if why and how which we as a species are just not there yet to have a deep understanding of things beyond a secular means. We still have yet to fully understand the essence of the space and time consortium ; in addition to anything that exists without the laws of what we know as physical reality. So l don't think none of us are fully capable in answering where the creator came from. Though faith may be rather difficult to defend it's all that many of us have and believe. So unfortunately because in the court of rational science faith loses, but for me it's an easy win, for l believe truly in my heat in what was witnessed by many in the scriptures, not to mention how regarding prophesy and from a historical perspective of what many historians, military, political and civilians wrote in many notes and journals that the creator exists. Besides I've personally experienced events in my life which as a result of my personal humility you wouldn't believe if l told you because rationality is not with me.

"Thousands of years..." LOL

@petermichaelw

Ай бұрын

Yes.

@andrewheller8597

Ай бұрын

I was laughing about that too.

@feellucky271

Ай бұрын

Hundreds of thousands if not more.

@sigmagic2874

Ай бұрын

@@feellucky271 probably for 3 billion years

@JakeyD23

Ай бұрын

@@sigmagic2874not even the most wild estimate doesn’t have humans walking around 3 billions years ago bud😂😂 lol the world isn’t 9000 years old but fuck there is a thing as being TOO liberal lmao. 2024

Person who didn't pay attention in school: why didn't i learn this

@dominusbalial835

Ай бұрын

Mine didn't even talk about it because they sucked ass lol

@thephenom9881

Ай бұрын

Regrets do always come after ignorance. 😔

@thilinagamage2569

Ай бұрын

Did you learn about the "Mind" behind DNA in high school that he is talking about?

@iAmGh33zy

Ай бұрын

@@thilinagamage2569 exactly , these people are so ignorant, since when did we start learning about god In school

@thilinagamage2569

Ай бұрын

@@iAmGh33zy correct!

Gotta love how he slipped in a bit of nonsense with his last comment 😂

@hater2764

Ай бұрын

Americans..... 🙄

@marcjanverdelantar9605

Ай бұрын

@@hater2764just secular atheists who changes their stance every season it becomes unconvincing, now it’s multiverse cause “nothing” is really stupid apparently😂

@jacksonh2083

Ай бұрын

⁠@@marcjanverdelantar9605​​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠Almost no one believes there is nothing and almost no one ever has. That’s mostly just theist rhetoric to push a false dichotomy of “god or nothing”. The multiverse hypothesis also is derived from evidence, not speculation. When we assume a basic ground states of everything (the most nothing anything can ever be; what you’d call god or “nothing”) they imply a multiverse. This is because if there’s a natural mechanism that allows for a universe to form, why would it be limited to one? Wouldn’t the mechanism persist after one? Plus, the different “natural mechanisms” and states of “nothingness” (oftentimes nothingness in this context means no space/time or matter/energy but some general properties) we’ve mathematically tested have all implied multiverses. It’s not just some random thought someone conjured up one day, it’s derived from actual evidence, scientific theories, etc. Plus, this isn’t an atheist thing either. A multiverse could exist under a god too. As an atheist, I find myself drawn to this belief not due to atheism but physics - I am a physics major (big fan of rick and morty too, so I’m biased lol). Don’t be mistaken, though, science has no regard for anyone’s beliefs, and this isn’t just some baseless belief. As a secular atheist, stop pushing a divide. I don’t care if you think dna is proof of God’s design or not, nor if you think it proves a specific religion. Seriously, I don’t care what religion you follow, I won’t treat you differently. As a person of science, though, and someone concerned for the future of our species, I can’t tolerate science denial. DNA is not a mere few thousand years old, nor is the earth, solar system, or universe. The evidence doesn’t depend on atheism, and science is neutral on this topic. Regardless of if there is or isn’t a god, the evidence remains unbothered; accept the evidence and bend your faith around it, because even if your God exists and your religion is true, the evidence remains unaffected - aka maybe your interpretation is wrong. And lastly, atheism isn’t the same as anti-theism, and atheists are a very diverse group because they’re united by _only _*_ONE_* “belief”, *NOT* by a belief system - that “belief” being the disbelief or lack of belief in god(s), that is it, nothing more to it.

@LeonelLimon-nj7tu

Ай бұрын

Think it was intentional?

@A_Stereotypical_Heretic

Ай бұрын

With the appeal to young earth creation?

The more I learn about science the more I believe in the intelligence of the creator

@LeonelLimon-nj7tu

Ай бұрын

There just no other way ahround it. We just didn't pop out of whatever some butthead says

@Bethsabee_Sheba_Newrose

Ай бұрын

@@LeonelLimon-nj7tu However, we *do* pop out of a place very close to a butthole. J/K

@atheistangel007

Ай бұрын

@@LeonelLimon-nj7tu No one in their right mind suggests that.

@atheistangel007

Ай бұрын

Then why do you think that neither science nor the evidence agree with you?

@Bethsabee_Sheba_Newrose

Ай бұрын

Which one of you had my reply deleted?

I learned this in school, nucleotides are grouped into 3 nucleotide chunks called codons that are read and copied by molecules called DNA polymerases, it’s plural because there are few different ones that work together to read and copy DNA. That process is called transcription. The dna is copied into a single stranded RNA called specifically an mRNA or messenger RNA. That mRNA is moved outside the nucleus and read by ribosomes where it reads the mRNA by its codons (there are 64 possible codons) until it reaches one of 3 codons that terminate the sequence also known as stop codons. For each codon read an amino acid is bonded to a chain and the chain is complete when a stop codon is read. The chain of amino acids (also known as a polypeptide chain) is very literally a protein your body will use for one of an infinite number of uses. The 61 non-stop codons are translated into one of 20 amino acids. Making for a nearly infinite number of possible sequences. This process is called translation. If you’ve stuck around this long you’re probably interested in the topic, so I’ll give you some brain teasers that have scientists scratching their heads TODAY. 1.) the body doesn’t make proteins it doesn’t need or can’t use, dna mutations (unlike in x-men) are extremely common and happen constantly in your own body. This process causes aging. Changes to the code sound like they should make drastic changes to your entire body right? They don’t, they can, but 99.999% of mutations are ignored because the body doesn’t read mRNA as a straight code, before it is read by a ribosome it is edited to be an exact code for a protein the body needs. It’s another long science explanation that I’m not getting into but, no book or biologist can tell you how the body knows which codons need to be in what sequence to make the exact protein the body needs. It’s not a blind editing, it is done precisely, we don’t know precisely why though. 2.) the DNA polymerases that are the key, gas pedal, and engine of the transcription process I talked about? You remember them? They unzip, stabilize, read, and code DNA into mRNA. This process lets us make specialized proteins for structure and enzymes that allow us to live functional lives. No enzymes, no biological catalysts to make energy consumption efficient enough for advanced life to exist. All enzymes and proteins in your body are coded from your DNA. The crazy question that baffles scientists and makes believers out of atheists? All of the DNA polymerases are enzymes, hence the suffix -ase, your DNA codes the thing that makes it possible for your DNA to be coded and read. Your ribosomes? Also coded from DNA. The leading theory on how DNA and RNA was first created was by random chemical interactions in ancient brine pools with harsh conditions and boom randomly existing genetic coding that does nothing on its own except exist. Which came first, the DNA/RNA or the only thing that reads and codes DNA/RNA but is created from the DNA/RNA. You see? It’s the chicken vs the egg but for all life as we know it. One cannot explain its existence without the other already being there unless you really stretch all known biology to fit wild theories nobody will ever be able to prove. I gave up trying to find an answer, came to the conclusion that we were designed this way or at bare minimum DNA/RNA and the polymerases came with the design plan. I can’t say if it’s God or some alien warlord named xenon the inflatable scrotum. But I can’t look at a schematic for a washing machine without knowing some guy named Jeff designed it. At least Jeff was nice enough to sign the blueprints for trademark purposes. Then again maybe whatever designed us left its signature in the genome we haven’t fully deciphered.

@johnharrison2511

Ай бұрын

Jeff did not design the washing machine. It was a long process involving many people. Very complex things can look like genius design but they are actually just problems being solved over a lot of time, where many factors eventually form into something useful. There was also no involvement of any God in the design of washing machines. Eggs existed long before any chickens. The main secret to creation, is time itself, plus matter.

@itsuzoma.5756

Ай бұрын

God is the designer, and He did leave his divine signature. We just grow up in times that make people seem foolish for believing that He did. It's crazy

@Tawadeb

Ай бұрын

I suggest you read the bible. There's codes in that too. :)

@3SeveredHeads

Ай бұрын

Dr Bruce Lipton wrote a great book called The Biology of Belief...on audiobook too and i may have seen it on yoitube...it is a great book discussing the importance of proteins & RNA in our functions as humans. He quit his prestigeous job as a cell biologist & tutor after discovering that RNA is more impactful than DNA & yet he was being forced to teach an untruth! When i saw new vaxs using mRNA I avoided like the plague & glad i did...they are messing with what they dont fully understand. Will add link if can...imo its worth listening to.

@3SeveredHeads

Ай бұрын

This is a good book...goes into RNA etc in an understandable way: kzread.info/dash/bejne/pmlnj7qem9jSqbQ.htmlsi=HjxQsPs4oA0fZLol My last comment was deleted so im just putting the link...the guy is a cellular biologist..

Science teacher here: We do learn this in school lol

@aaronmontgomery2055

Ай бұрын

I remember this from middle school, am I crazy that this is supposed to be basic knowledge?

@glaive120

Ай бұрын

@@aaronmontgomery2055 because he said those things before and after the clip, more people interacted with it and spent more time on it. It ends up on more and more peoples feeds. Whether he knew this or not is another question.

@aaronmontgomery2055

Ай бұрын

@@glaive120 I don’t understand, did you comment on the wrong comment?

@glaive120

Ай бұрын

@@aaronmontgomery2055 No youre not crazy, this is pretty common highschool bio info. What I'm saying is that last clip about "this has existed for thousands of years before mankind" or whatever leads me to think he literally only said those things to avoid copyright and drive engagement up. We are in a "reacting to bait clips" meta of youtube shorts.

Another argument for proof of intelligent design. The designer is God.

@shawnpaquette5835

Ай бұрын

How is it proof of anything? I'm being 100% serious. What makes you give "God" credit? Not trying to be mean. Legitimate question.

@voxac30withstrat

Ай бұрын

@@shawnpaquette5835 Simply because the astounding complexity involved to make life work and the fact that its about science is because there had to be someone who set the rules. Some say science and religion don't mix but it was God who created science. Ironically there are many hundreds if not thousands of famous scientists who used inspiration from the Bible to investigate and discover what we know and take for granted today.

@kitmateyawa7829

Ай бұрын

@@shawnpaquette5835 DNA is too complicated to be random but intricate enough to show design.

@Themohr

Ай бұрын

@@voxac30withstrat Is the fact that a phenomenon is complex really evidence of a designer? Isn't the complexity of the thing and our awe of it really telling us more about our own limitations rather than proving there's some designer here? I mean, your argument is basically the same rationale used historically in polytheistic religions - the weather is too big and unpredictable and complicated so it must be Zeus!

@Themohr

Ай бұрын

@@kitmateyawa7829 your whole statement hinges on relativistic perspectives. How complicated is "too" complicated? Too complicated for whom? Even if the answer is all of humanity, we can only say all of humanity up to today. What do you mean by random? Do you mean emergent, or do you mean that we don't understand or can't perceive the events and forces which affect the outcome? How is design shown? What even is design here? Does a spider "design" its webs? What's being designed? Life, humans, DNA?

Francis Crick was one of the GREATEST minds of the modern era.

I learned this in public high school science class in Australia. We did a week or so on genetics. The letters we assign to the 'code' are A, T, G & C.

@Diathon1

Ай бұрын

G CAT 4Me

@steelfuser435

Ай бұрын

That's what I was thinking, everyone's generic code is unique AFAIK, but widely known. They made a movie called GATTACA, whose plot centered on this.

@mycatsnameiskaren8253

Ай бұрын

GC (gonorrhea) TA (tits & ass) is the acronym I used to remember in nursing school. 😉

@triste4-21

Ай бұрын

You forgot Uracil

@elginator1

Ай бұрын

@@triste4-21that’s RNA

The ancients already knew this. Modern education, oligarchs, politicians, social engineers, education, don't want people to know this kind of stuff.

@A_Stereotypical_Heretic

Ай бұрын

They taught it in school...

The sad part is that this seems like relatively recently discovered information. However, there are entire documentaries on these facts that are now decades old.

Well you must’ve missed that whole year of biology class

@devinfordale8386

Ай бұрын

How so?

@SnakeWasRight

Ай бұрын

Stephen Meyer is a liar and a fraud, with absolutely zero expertise in what he's talking about. DNA is so redundant, self-antagonistic, nonsense, and just plain poorly designed, that it is OBVIOUS TO LITERALLY THE ENTIRE BIOLOGICAL COMMMUNITY that it isn't designed. That's why we don't teach pseudoscience religious nonsense like this in school. We also observe DNA building new "codes" purely through evolution and mutation and NOT design. In fact, when scientist try to DESIGN computer code like AI, DNA, RNA, and protein sequences, the BEST method for doing so is RANDOM MUTATION and selection, aka evolution, NOT design. Evolution is SUPERIOR to design for the most complex codes. Stop these lies and educate yourself. ​@@devinfordale8386

@PLF...

Ай бұрын

​@@devinfordale8386> everything said in the video is wrong mate

@cmhardin37

Ай бұрын

​@@PLF...Ok. I believe it now that you said that.

@wildheartfree420

Ай бұрын

Bio class (in secular schooling) DID NOT teach that a divine creator is responsible for the organization of DNA. They instead suggested that DNA somehow formed out of evolutionary chance.

I went to a public high school in a rough neighborhood, and they did mention this code in DNA. (adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G) and thymine (T) ). Now they didn’t go too much in detail, but what I’m trying to say is that if they went over this in my high school, they probably went over it in many other high schools, since consider my high school one of the poorest.

@NoKingFreeRadical

Ай бұрын

This is the first Turing machine. Watson and Crick - tremendous race to the double helix. Just starting to unravel that code - not just talking about the transcription to proteins. The ultimate enigma.

@justins2497

Ай бұрын

Yeah me too, i remember that stuff from science, I think people are just f'n dumb.

@hakmanp.8702

Ай бұрын

What he wants to say .. That he wants schools to teach conspiracy theories and Magical thinking that's all this is .. taking real information and distorting it to explain and/or imply a magical/conspiratorial ideia .

@Katethagr8

Ай бұрын

They did lol

@iball9244

Ай бұрын

Went to a public high school in a good area and same story. We touched Gene sequences but did not go in depth

“We always come to a mind, not a material process..” that’s actually an incredible statement

@darrennew8211

Ай бұрын

The funny thing is, they present a material process, then conclude with saying "we never find a material process."

I don't know why people expect randomness at the center of an impossibly complex chemical reaction. Stuff builds out and emergence is a wild phenomenon.

This is pretty basic biology you learn in school

@dominusbalial835

Ай бұрын

This makes me pissed off that my school didn't teach it and I had to learn it on my own.

@thilinagamage2569

Ай бұрын

Did you learn about the "Mind" behind DNA in high school that he is talking about?

@uncertaintytoworldpeace3650

Ай бұрын

This is such gaslighting the school system is blatant horseshit. Kids have graduated without taking the required classes and nothing happens. But right. Americans are learning a lot in school. If you're joking your ass of maybe.

@uncertaintytoworldpeace3650

Ай бұрын

Establishment supporter comments are SO dumb and SO everywhere that it is breaking what was my critically functioning brain. With medical pharmaslavery and forced attention on boringmaxxed topics alien to all children.

@omednaseri5940

Ай бұрын

Yea, you already had in your genes.

Teacher: “DNA, aka: genetic code..” Guy 20 years later: “why were we never taught DNA was a code?”

@onecalmpixel3297

Ай бұрын

I think... he meant that it's not taught how this codes source is mind

@dmitriy4708

Ай бұрын

@@onecalmpixel3297 yea, bacause it is not science, it is creationism a.k.a. religion. There is no place for religion in scientific classroom.

@onesolopolo4194

Ай бұрын

@@onecalmpixel3297 wanna try that again?

@_Huperniketes_

Ай бұрын

You weren’t taught enough of the mechanism behind it to realize life didn’t appear on life spontaneously. It is the product of intelligent design. Understanding the use of two distinct parts: DNA (encoded instructions for assembling an organism) and ribosomes (the decoder and assembler). They are like a 3D model and 3D printer. DNA cannot create cells on their own, and ribosomes do not assemble organisms without instructions. Both are required. And since ribosomes can’t build parts unless the parts are described in DNA, the DNA must hold the instructions for building ribosomes as well as the other cell parts. How did those instructions get encoded in the DNA? How also did the ribosome and DNA come upon the same encoding alphabet to convey these instructions if these molecules were the product of random processes?

@dmitriy4708

Ай бұрын

@@_Huperniketes_ Google about abiogenesis, RNA world theory etc. It is not a result of random processes, there is a growing field of study how it came to be. The issue is not resolved yet, however we discovered some mechanisms that could result in life-like systems. Intelligent design is not a science, it is religious dogmatic point of view without a shred of evidence in support of it, a simple God of the gaps.

You forgot about the part of the hypothesis that states that the "Code" of our genetics were in fact fashioned by an advanced civilization and sent to earth. The hypothesis is also called cosmic panspermia.

@darrennew8211

Ай бұрын

I don't think panspermia requires life to be designed by aliens. Just that it's common enough to have come from off the planet.

Man doesn't reject God with his head, he rejects him with his heart.

These four letters are: Adenine (A) Cytosine (C) Guanine (G) Thymine (T)

@reesebonds8139

Ай бұрын

Take it further A binds to T , C binds to G, and A U? What about mRNA , A binds to U, so if mRNA was used in the covid vaccine , what message was put in there 🤨

@KevinS702

Ай бұрын

@@reesebonds8139 An existence of an Alpha Helix, bound by secondary B sheets of amino acids to mitochondrial, E- coli

@ScoutGrey

Ай бұрын

@@reesebonds8139 great question

@davidenkelaar1285

Ай бұрын

@@reesebonds8139 the message put in there is a blueprint for a replica of the so called spike protein which is on the outside layer of a coronavirus. When you’re jnfected with covid, or get vaccinated, this spike protein is recognized and remembered by you’re immune system to fend off future infections quickly.

@shy404usernotfound

Ай бұрын

@@reesebonds8139 what the hell is "U"?

You didnt learn it in school because you werent paying attention apparently

@bedestapleton2417

Ай бұрын

By the look of the comments, they where too busy reading the bible

@davidrosen5137

Ай бұрын

@@bedestapleton2417 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@sstills951

Ай бұрын

@@bedestapleton2417*they were Even the Bible gets were and where correctly.

@lynnfisher3037

Ай бұрын

Oh I see. You were present in every other school in America simultaneously so I guess YOU are God. Congratulations

@flyingostrich88

Ай бұрын

I came here to say this... like I'm pretty sure everyone learned about genetics in school.

There's a book called In The Beginning Was Information, by Werner Gitt. It is amazing how these things are. As a medic, I am convinced that people who want to believe evolution do so because they want to. Not because it is reasonable, but because it is unreasonable

@joshs7959

Ай бұрын

I might have to look for that book, thanks.

@darrennew8211

Ай бұрын

The idea that a medical professional would disbelieve the most fundamental theory of his profession is rather disturbing. Remind me not to get shot near you. Are you up on germ theory, or do you still try to cast the demons into pigs when someone gets sick? What's next, physicists who don't believe in atoms?

I learned this in high school...in 1962. Why didn't you learn it? I came home from school one day, and a naval intelligence person asked me to pronounce RNA (in the long way). Which I did fluently. He was angry saying "They are not supposed to teach evolution in public schools." He threatened to cancel federal funding for our biology textbooks. Which they did.

@MarkNOTW

6 күн бұрын

I graduated in 85 and never heard any of this

@natterlynabob1472

6 күн бұрын

@@MarkNOTW Exactly. We need to get the federal government out of our schools.

We did. We definitely learned about this in school. Some of us were a bit distracted with hormones raging but this basic info was taught.

I’ve heard that if genes, or DNA or chromosomes or something are assigned a musical value & then they’re played, all strands will reveal actual music and not just a bunch of random sounds, that’s incredible.

@yoeyyoey8937

Ай бұрын

Anything can be music if you assign harmonic degrees to them

@scottk1525

Ай бұрын

It's not incredible. It's just people overlaying our own frame of reference onto something natural. I've heard the "music" that DNA creates. It's a mess. Same with the "coding" analogy, or describing mitochondria as a "power plant," or our brain as a "computer" etc. They're just analogies and metaphors that christians confuse for being literal. Kind of like how they interpret the bible.

@ninam7933

Ай бұрын

​@@scottk1525Huh? Yell us, please...how you bash Christians who read the Bible from "coding" and DNA molecules??? Whacked

@darkbroth3rh00d4

Ай бұрын

@@scottk1525 curious as your argument on how coding isn’t a good analogy for DNA? When we talk about creation of protein from mRNA, it’s a coded strand with a start codon, localization sequence, functional components, guanine caps and poly A tails, editing, splicing, rearrangements (in certain viruses and bacteria), etc. If it wasn’t coded by DNA, it wouldn’t be able to be read by a ribosome (also coded for by rRNA) which is assembled also by localization sites that are created and form into the most favorable free energy form (based on the rRNA that encodes those). DNA is also able to be edited, spliced, sliced, split, shifted, mutated, repaired, etc like a normal computer code would be as well. They’re called analogies because they are analogues (similar ideas that don’t share the same origin but are close in structure or function). So these analogies are good because they help relate similar topics together. I’d like to hear your thoughts on the mitochondria and brain analogies if you want to discuss those. I’m a Christian and have always believed. I don’t believe a purine was spontaneously created and formed and placed together in some place (even ignoring prokaryotic origin theory’s sulfurous vents claim or the lightning in a bottle claim). Let alone multiple purines somehow being made simultaneously to the point of encoding a functional piece of DNA that was able to code for a functional protein (without a ribosome), that was capable of coding for a ribosome, that was able to read that DNA to mRNA and not destroy that DNA piece to create a membrane and be bound and be consumed…. I’ll respond more if you’re interested but I would like to say before you retort and say “you’re just a Christian and silly” or whatever that you’re intelligent and your opinion matters as well. My message above was mostly to point out what I saw as a fallacy from my viewpoint. Most of us Christians shouldn’t throw the book at you and make you feel like we are condemning you for believing this or that. We all fall short the glory of God. We want you to be saved. A life spent not knowing God results in an eternity of pain and suffering. He’ll be waiting for you. Psalms 27:13

@imaamericangirl1406

Ай бұрын

This is true. Dr. Ohno was one scientist involved in the DNA and music coding research. It was in the news way back in the late 1980’s, if I remember it correctly.

If you're too busy listening to preachers instead of teachers then it's no surprise you think this isn't taught in schools.

It was taught in school. And still is. It's just that kids don't give a shit and don't listen. We were the same when we were kids too.

We learnt about this in Biology when we were 16. Just because you're an adult now and didn't pay attention it doesn't mean they didn't teach it.

@olivebre4170

Ай бұрын

He seems older, so could be a generation thing. What generation are you?

@olivebre4170

Ай бұрын

Oh yeah- and what school matters. I switched around a bit, I notice schools aren't 100% uniformed. I was told in one school I'd learn cursive in the next grade, then that came and was told we should have already been taught cursive.

@PLF...

Ай бұрын

No real school teaches this

@olivebre4170

Ай бұрын

@@PLF... I think- if I'm understanding what's being talked about They do teach that there his patterns of chemicals.

@MushroomBase

Ай бұрын

You heard. You didn't know..

They taught us this, they just didnt try to influence any of our beliefs with it.

@Kelvinapplegate

Ай бұрын

God forbid we have our beliefs influenced truth. Sheeesh

@fedup745

Ай бұрын

Perhaps they left it up to students to put two and two together,

@justme-gd4gq

Ай бұрын

@@fedup745 yeah that's what I mean. That's the human experience as it is, present the information and it will be processed. As far as faith goes that's the only way to truly find it anyways, come to it freely. Anything else would be false, whether that belief were true or not.

@dw4270

Ай бұрын

My experience with school, most teachers were liberal and would go out of their way to make social political points on a daily basis.

@justme-gd4gq

Ай бұрын

@@dw4270 perhaps it's a generational and even regional thing. But technically there is the whole church and state separation, which was my initial point.

I learned this on 1997 in biology! We even learned how to find the defect in the code. I can't remember anymore the order/pattern, but it definitely held my attention.

I may not have learned that specific thing in school, but I did learn it; by teaching myself. By reading, and watching educational videos, and using logic to put two and two together.

1. They do teach this in high school. 2. This has existed for billions of years, not merely thousands.

@PLF...

Ай бұрын

They dont. None of whats in this video is correct.

@lynnfisher3037

Ай бұрын

Didn't know we had schools billions of years ago😅

@_Huperniketes_

Ай бұрын

@@PLF...oh, you have something other than DNA for reproduction? 🙄

@aaronmontgomery2055

Ай бұрын

@@PLF... outside of the god bs and it being exactly or even close to a computer language, it is right. It’s just basic things like acgt. Stuff you learn in middle school science.

@p_campbell

Ай бұрын

@@aaronmontgomery2055 we can leave God out of you want. There is still a universal code that exists. We have cracked A,G,T,C. But that's only our interpretation. It may go deeper it may be a completely different language we haven't understood yet. Like other symbols ☪️✡️♾️🕉️⚛️🪯 . We just don't know, our comprehension is only a glimpse.

So apparently GW Bush's no child left behind act really ruined the US school system. I learned about this as a kid in school.

@macc4835

Ай бұрын

Or, the plan worked...

@mikeb.7068

Ай бұрын

True. It was actually the No Child Gets Ahead Act.

@yulfine1688

Ай бұрын

@@macc4835 yeah no.. it didn't help.. not at all the system is far worse than it's ever been in most stated be it red or blue..

@Jayhawk92

Ай бұрын

I was in a public high school in the US during No Child Left Behind, and I learned this in school.

@waltercapa5265

Ай бұрын

Except the part of the mind which is bs.

Everyone saying :"We did learn this in school" : He's talking about the end where he says the only conclusion is there is a mind behind the design. You most certainly were NOT taught that, you were taught it's the result of random mutation in a meaningless universe.

They did teach you that in school, and it’s not quite so mysterious as you might think. The “code” represents sequences of amino acids that create proteins, and the shapes of the amino acids are what determine the shape (and therefore function) of the protein. And they don’t need to be optimal. They just need to be good enough to get their job done

@collinspo

Ай бұрын

.... and the *sequence of the amino acids... Didn't know that they don't really need to be uptimal to function. Thanks and will investigate further.

@AndrewJosephKeith

Ай бұрын

“Good enough to get the job done” is functionally impossible to achieve via random unguided mutations. That’s the point. For every functional sequence there are trillions of non-functional possibilities. Therefore random mutation is not a sufficient to explain thousands and thousands of functioning proteins.

@drewprice9284

Ай бұрын

@@AndrewJosephKeithIt is possible. Your argument is one made from incredulity, which are very hard to counter only because there is SO much advanced science that goes into the study of abiogenesis that it can’t be explained to people easily. If you truly wish to become more educated on this subject, I implore you to look at research papers about the natural origin of DNA structure and integral proteins by “random chance” (it isn’t random, but again, too much explanation for a single youtube comment). I really hope you will do this and I advise you to keep an open mind.

@JonCookeBridge

Ай бұрын

@@AndrewJosephKeithWhy so incurious? How this might have occurred is a fascinating subject. “God did it!” is utterly unsatisfying as an answer. This God of the gaps in scientific knowledge has had his remit shrink consistently throughout history as more things are discovered.

@KevinS702

Ай бұрын

@@AndrewJosephKeith Is that a reference to mitochondrial E coli of the electron transport chain in proceriotic cells , Or the secondary structure of B sheets in general ?

Saul Goodman is now a biologist

@patldennis

Ай бұрын

Nice. I noticed that similarity years ago. But Stephen Meyer is not a biologist.

As fascinated as i was with all this stuff. I could never figure it out. Learning disabilities and what not I fell behind but i appreciate people like you that explain this shit

The internet is full of idiots....

@BostonSports1992

Ай бұрын

The funny part is they think they're the smartest ones in room too.

@Phobos1483

Ай бұрын

The scary part is that this usually applies to someone who doesn't realise it. Even those who smugly place denigrating comments like "The internet is full of idiots..." I bet you wear a fedora

@SewingBoxDesigns

Ай бұрын

And cats, don't forget the cats.

So we’re clear. The existence of a designer is proven. The existence of God is not.

You weren’t listening that day. We most certainly learned that in school.

@Apogee012

Ай бұрын

you dont

@duckfan12able

Ай бұрын

When?

@bobcat24

Ай бұрын

@@duckfan12able 10th grade at my school.

@andrewirwin6879

Ай бұрын

There are articles suggesting that Cricks teachings be a part of school curriculum, but it is currently not.

@kidusgetachew9215

Ай бұрын

Exactly bro was playing PS1 while this was told. AGTC were the bases if I remember correctly.

I actually learned this in a liberal college 😮 but I wasn’t taught it on purpose. God intervened that quarter. I was turning atheist (remember I said liberal college) and questioning everything. One quarter my advisor put me in a human anatomy class and a Philosophy class. I’d go to anatomy and my mind would be blown, I was coming to my own conclusion that there is no way the human body evolved to it’s perfection by accident or even come to existence by accident. Then learning the genome project. 🤯🤯🤯Then go to my philosophy class where turns out the professor was a devout catholic and taught his class as a theology class. It was such an amazing experience seeing how God worked hard on me that year. Thank you Lord for not forgetting about me and forgiving me. ❤️✝️🙏🏽❤️✝️🙏🏽

@cynthiahample7793

2 ай бұрын

Love it!

@therealong

2 ай бұрын

Nice testimony by the way. One just has to connect the wiring in the right way... ;-)

@bobblacka918

2 ай бұрын

Great story, but I'm amazed a Catholic Professor was even allowed to teach in a liberal college since many liberal colleges are trying to stamp out religion of any type.

@shannaidoo130

2 ай бұрын

Not many are fortunate enough to be blessed this way.

@eazyrat

2 ай бұрын

​@@shannaidoo130god chooses who to bless and who to torture...or something

"Why did we not learn this in school?" Dude, I learned this in elementary school biology class, then again in high school biology class, and again in university in biomedical engineering course.

“Why didnt we learn this in school….” Because we were not paying attention

"Thousands of years" It's been a lot longer than that bro 😂

@Erumyr

Ай бұрын

Since The creation of man

@DadeMurphie

Ай бұрын

@@Erumyr *evolution of man

@branhub

Ай бұрын

He just needed an excuse to put his face at the end so he’s not “stealing content”

@watercolourmark

Ай бұрын

​@@branhub- I think he believes the world is thousands of years old 😮

@greghelm843

Ай бұрын

Earth's 5000 years old bro. We were around for years without gravity then one day apple's started falling out of trees onto people's heads

In electronics, there are two ways to store and present information, analog and digital. Analog means the information is stored and presented in a form where the amplitude or frequency of the voltage defines the content of the information. Vinyl records and tape recorders use analog methods of storing data. Digital means it is not the size or color that defines a piece of information, but rather, the shape. For example, the letter A could be any color and any size, but would always be an A. It depends where the letter A is located in a word and sentence that gives it meaning. Thus, words and sentences are also digital in nature because it's the character itself that makes up the information, not the size or color of the character. The DNA code is just like that.

@therealong

2 ай бұрын

@bobblacka918 Personally I am one of those that miss the warmth in the analog rendering, what sound is concerned, esp. in recording acoustic instruments. Besides, modern digitalization and data development involves more than just recording sound. If you scroll a few posts upward you might find a series of comments that dealt with A.I. and coding. However, have you ever given a thought to whether it will ever be possible to digitalize a smell or a taste? 🤔

@thecraftmunk1640

2 ай бұрын

So DNA is technically a digital storage medium. That's awesome. The thing I really want to know is how the physical body interacts with the spirit/soul and vice versa. Is there a "spiritual DNA” of some kind, and how does it affect the physical.

@Themightystar5000

2 ай бұрын

​@@thecraftmunk1640There is no point in talking about something that is not physical. The soul may have something to do with consciousness. But if this is true, it does not seem that we will know because consciousness is not a physical thing

@toosiyabrandt8676

Ай бұрын

Hi ‘IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE WORD AND THE WORD WAS WITH GOD AND THE WORD WAS COD’ John 1:1

@relvielome5988

Ай бұрын

@@toosiyabrandt8676 Amen.

This guy's knowledge is below the charts.

There are people out there that think our ancestors were gorillas and apes 😂 .

Hey genius, DNA existed for billions of years before humans discovered it.

@cleanserene6330

Ай бұрын

Lol

@johnlazarin3807

Ай бұрын

Keeping it simple!!!! Lol

@mikethemachinist1

Ай бұрын

Says you. Your billions of years, very well may have been maybe 10s of thousands of years. More and more scientists are coming to the fact that there was, and IS and will also be the creator. God was taken out of the schools and look at the mess of things today. It is truly sickening.

@Silentgunner555

Ай бұрын

Why so cynical? Afraid you’re infrared world belief is wrong?

@Meechy37

Ай бұрын

​@@mikethemachinist1 If you think the United States made a mistake by separating religion from government and schools, you need to redo high school.

“thousands of years” 😅😂

@matteofalduto766

Ай бұрын

More like 4 billion years

@75Cee

Ай бұрын

I have the same reaction when I hear billions of years.

@sulfuras1985

Ай бұрын

Show one proof of evolution. The entire world is waiting...

@GildaLee27

Ай бұрын

Thank you.

@rondoespsych5901

Ай бұрын

@@sulfuras1985 They see species of spiders and Scorpions in caves that were sealed for hundreds+ years and they're colorless and often blind or lacking eyes, we also see inferential things like species that are designed better for a specific environment thriving better and the less beneficial traits of other species causing them to die off or reduce in population. Furthermore go watch a video of a human sperm cell from sperm to fetus. That single cell become billions, and they differentiate into new and different cells all in days. If that, why wouldn't species have offspring with slight genetic variances (which we already observe) and the beneficial variances cause thriving, leading to more reproduction, increased proliferation. Humans can already alter the genetic makeup up animals to make them dramatically different, why do you think that DNA can't vary in nature, especially when you see the variances between similar and vastly different species already?

This was part of the California Education Curriculum when I went to school in the 60s and 70s.

Love how the people who did not pay attention in school are now mad about what they did not learn.

@tienglongmy

Ай бұрын

You learned DNA was encoded by a mind in school? I sure didn't...

You didn't learn about this in school because you didn't freaking listen, Brandon!

Just a reminder that Nobel prize genius Crick was under the influence of LSD when he made this incredible discovery.

And this is exactly what I use as a first step in explaining why I’m convinced that Life didn’t exist by “accident” or “chance”

Not sure which school you went to, but CGAT nucleotides is definitely something we learned in school.

@lauroneto3360

Ай бұрын

You learned it works like a digital code? Maybe back in your days there wasnt this thing called digital yet.

@williamj9413

Ай бұрын

@@lauroneto3360american schools definitely teach this in high school, not sure why this is such a brain destroying concept for you people lmao

Stuff existed before it was discovered by people. Incredible. What else blows your mind? Toast used to be bread?

@babysquirrelxxoo8136

Ай бұрын

Are you always this cynical? Sad.

@jmrm01

Ай бұрын

@@babysquirrelxxoo8136 It's not cynicism. That's what science is, discovering how things work. Some of those things worked for over 13 billion years before we even existed.

@laurelmorris6995

Ай бұрын

@@jmrm01 Proverbs 25:2 - "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter and the glory of kings to search it out." It is the glory of God to conceal a matter: There are many mysteries in the universe, both material and spiritual. There are many things God has concealed. It is one of God’s ways to say, “You are amazed by what you see; yet what you don’t see, what I have concealed, is even greater.” The glory of kings is to search out a matter: It is the glory of great men (kings) to search out what God has concealed. This speaks to our pursuit of God’s mysteries in the spiritual world, but perhaps even more so to God’s mysteries in the material world. When men and women seek out scientific knowledge, trying to understand the mystery and brilliance of what God has concealed in His creation, they express an aspect of the glory of humanity, even the glory of kings. Therefore, we say to the scientist, search on, and do so with all your strength. In all their searching, the scientist should still keep this humble remembrance: It is the glory of God to conceal a matter. “What I see amazes me, but God has concealed even greater treasures of knowledge and wisdom in His creation (Romans 1:19-20). I must not arrogantly think that I can figure it all out.” As G. Campbell Morgan wrote, “That is the principle of all the triumphs of scientific investigations; and it is the deepest secret of all advance in spiritual strength.” - Enduring Word Bible Commentary Proverbs 25 enduringword.com/bible-commentary/proverbs-25

It’s interesting how people act like school curriculum don’t change over time, just cuz you learned something back in the day don’t mean it’s still being taught today.

If there was a designer I wouldn't pay him for that job.

I was taught this in A LEVEL biology

@PLF...

Ай бұрын

Sounds like an American school

@rinzlr3554

Ай бұрын

@@PLF... as an American, A level does not exist unless it’s apart of a private curriculum. Nice try

@arcticghost1393

Ай бұрын

​@@PLF... It's the English school system.

DNA isn't a code. Code is what we use to explain it to each other. Have you ever heard the saying, "confusing the map for the place"?

@jeremystone2658

Ай бұрын

Exactly 💯

@catchdog5759

Ай бұрын

My toughts exactly. Can't tell the menu from the meal.

@Cybeonix

Ай бұрын

I could possibly be code; what it is NOT is what this video claims. It's NOT INFORMATION

@rnkim2564

Ай бұрын

DNA explains what processes are to be done by organs and the organism as a whole

@ilmt

Ай бұрын

@@Cybeonix Technically it is an information - depends on how you define it. For instance tree trunk growth rings are information too - it gives you the age of the tree, yet we know they occur naturally.

Crick was also so blown away by this discovery that he figured this could not have been made by random chance, chemistry, and millions of years. So he decided that it must have been made by aliens. Yep. Crick was one of the original Ancient Aliens guys.

Hmm ok. But why do bananas and humans share 50% DNA? Cats 90%, dogs 80%, elephants 65%, chimps 98.5%? If we were “engineered” this wouldn’t be the case. If we evolved over time from common ancestors, this would be the case. ( which it is)

@MimifromChicago

Ай бұрын

Or maybe God didn't want to "reinvent the wheel." Taking good basic characters and building on them for more complex or different organisms would be most efficient.

@adrowsypoet

Ай бұрын

Uh, same programmer? Same artist? Same writer? Same creator?

@SphericalCowPhysics

Ай бұрын

​@MimifromChicago efficiency clearly isn't God's MO if the universe is indeed his creation with the intent for it to produce humans 13.8 billion years after starting the creation process using a Rube Goldberg style of stellar development.

@alansabin7487

Ай бұрын

you can have many different looking structures and use the same materials. a cell is a cell and atom an atom. living creatures should have a lot of like parts to exist . read John, Acts, Romans, us the king james bible and let your heat be still. take care.

@vanessamartz7596

Ай бұрын

Why do 90% of steel bridges share the same girder systems? Obviously they were not engineered. What a crock of simplistic drivel. Start with insitu protein folding, move on to circular homeostatic enzymatic processes, dive into epigenetic variac feedback loops. Come back and tell me how obvious it all is. It would realistically take a billion times the life of our universe for one circular homeostatic mechanism to occur by chance. That's not including the production of the ovum progenitor or the limits added by degrees of freedom. I cannot stand the blather of people who expostulate like a Postdoc fellow with the finesse and understanding of a preschooler. Get the math and probability down at least.

We learned this in Biochemistry in med school 55 years ago but in a public school, the professor did not lead us back to the Grand Design. It did occur later intuitively as we learned more about the intricacies of our body processes in Biochem, Physiology, Pharmacology and Pathology.

@tricursor2481

Ай бұрын

Is it just me or are these comments insane. It's like they see one letter "codes" and their mind just jumps to intelligent design. It takes five seconds to Google it

@Chertseywarrior

Ай бұрын

Did you previously not believe in a higher power?

@dfjpr

Ай бұрын

@@Chertseywarrior What higher power.

@ayushkadel1168

Ай бұрын

@@dfjprtime is the higher power not a god

@dfjpr

Ай бұрын

@@ayushkadel1168 ah yes, thanks.

You didn't learn this in school because you weren't paying attention...

In Eastern Europe we learned this in Biology class in grade 8. This is not something you communicate with regular Australian or Americans because they "dont believe" in information not on TikTok or McDonald's webpage

You know exactly why we didn’t learn this in school. Because it teaches you nothing about being a good employee.

@Nameentered

Ай бұрын

What are you talking about. School doesn't teach you how to be a good employee. It quite literally does the opposite. Its the parents who teach their kids how to be a good worker for life in general. Not just as an employee, but as a human being. All life takes work. You get rid of capitalism you would still be required to do some type of work in order to survive. That or you would have to enslave people to do the work for you. Again to live requires work, no matter what

@DavidAnderson-ic9rb

Ай бұрын

You're right. Unfortunately in some professional circles, if you're not brainwashed into full abandoned devotion to naturalistic darwinism and dare show a differing opinion, there's a good chance you'll be punished, and will definitely be ridiculed. You're wrong in supposing that the only things taught in school are directly applicable to the workforce. This is something that should be taught in gen eds as a basic principle.

@DadeMurphie

Ай бұрын

You just weren't paying attention or chose different courses.

@StixFerryMan

Ай бұрын

Firstly, no, we were not taught this in school, because it is bs gobbledygook. Second, are you claiming that we should all be bad workers? Thirdly, what school did you go that taught you to be workers, good or bad? Funny how the ppl who disparage education as some kind of big conspiracy style thing are the ones who don’t really have a firm grasp on basic knowledge.

@MercenarySed

Ай бұрын

Because this isn't real. Saying "a god did it" doesn't explain anything. Where would a god come from anyway? This is silly 😂

God is great! Give him the glory!

@AwakenTheEarth

2 ай бұрын

- no thanks!!!

@herringtonherding

2 ай бұрын

Hallelujah, thank you Jesus!!

@Yehoshua66

Ай бұрын

Amen. Praise our great Christ.

@vernivon2856

Ай бұрын

God wins

@Mr_Green1017

Ай бұрын

@@AwakenTheEarth I know deep down you know there is a God. Why rebel?

Radiation : "hey"

The fact that the OP learned this from Stephen Meyer, a creationist pseudo-scientist, says a lot about his education level. In Greece, we learned this in 10th grade biology.

The actual work was done by Rosalind Franklin. Watson and Crick stole the data and published the results without giving her credit.

@HITEKSTRANGER

Ай бұрын

Wow! That is awful but not unusual. This should be made into a documentary.

@alecmiller6084

Ай бұрын

Thanks you I was looking for a comment about Rosalind.

@obansrinathan

Ай бұрын

That’s not true either though. Franklin was responsible (along with Maurice Wilkins (I may have the name wrong)) with taking x-rays of dna, which were used by Watson and Crick to help develop their model. The extent to which it was stolen is also of some debate, since the work used was shared with Watson and Crick by people on the research team, and some of it had been presented. Franklin had died by the time a Nobel was on offer, so was ineligible, but if she hadn’t she might have had a share.

@SmallWetIsland

Ай бұрын

@@obansrinathan All true but they never acknowledged her contribution "Such acknowledgement as they gave her was very muted and always coupled with the name of Wilkins" By January 1953, Franklin had reconciled her conflicting data, concluding that both DNA forms had two helices, and had started to write a series of three draft manuscripts, two of which included a double helical DNA backbone" her work was instrumental in determining the structure. "Franklin pointed out that the progressive solubility of DNA crystals in water meant that the strongly hydrophilic phosphate groups were likely to be on the outside of the structure; while the experimental failure to titrate the CO- and NH2 groups of the bases meant that these were more likely to be inaccessible in the interior of the structure. This initial setback led Watson and Crick to focus on other topics for most of the next year." She contributed as much to the discovery of DNA as Watson and Crick and her insights were not restricted to her work with X-ray crystallography.

@jemborg

Ай бұрын

​​@@obansrinathan incorrect on several fronts because Watson & Crick claimed that they came to those results _purely_ through modelling, which was a lie. Also it was poor science. They did this as to not share the credit even though her work in X-ray crystallography was crucial. I'm not even sure if their access to her data was entirely above board. They did confer with her too. Also, either Watson or Crick (I forget which) suffered a crisis of conscience over this dishonesty. All this has come out you can't forgive these guys for it. Another woman robbed of her rightful recognition for her contribution to science.

ANother important point about DNA is that if both strings of the ladder go the same direction ie; like both going up or both sides going down the information terminates too quickly but in DNA point sides of the ladder of DNA go in the opposite directions one up one down so that the information can go on forever to make extremely complex information transport.

@margaretrobinson7345

Ай бұрын

Very interesting information!! Established what was in the back of my mind from a very Young age, in a high school biology class this was illustrated and taught it did leave me with unanswered question until now! Thank you for this important information!! Much appreciated!!!

@ScaleCrawling

Ай бұрын

It makes sense that DNA found in this world is both complex and easily decodeable. It would be strange if it was simple and hard to decode. The same DNA clearly shows that all life on earth is related and part of a family tree created over vast time through natural processes.

@Themightystar5000

Ай бұрын

@@ScaleCrawling There is no explanation for the appearance of the first cell or DNA. I don't know what you mean by a connected tree because there is no evidence of evolution in the fossil record

@MercenarySed

Ай бұрын

How does that prove a god exists? This is silly 😂

@Themightystar5000

Ай бұрын

@@MercenarySed What? do you know what is DNA

Bloody hell, she is so adorable! My entire time growing up, my fellow Canadians were confused that I always said 'bloody hell' since I was 7. It happens when one side of your family is pure Scots.

“Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.” - ‭‭Luke‬ ‭12‬:‭7‬‬

We do learn this in school about DNA, high school, college, this is bio 101

@bitset3741

2 ай бұрын

Information theory and how it relates to both DNA, and origins is not Bio 101.

@Chubby1G_TV

2 ай бұрын

Def not the part after code breaker thing

@queent3343

2 ай бұрын

Exactly. ACGT.

@ronaldmorgan7632

2 ай бұрын

We never learned this in high school.

@queent3343

2 ай бұрын

@@ronaldmorgan7632 About DNA? Was your school in the Deep South?

Pattern: exists Theology: and i took that personally

@justinlaboy5712

Ай бұрын

It’s a Sequence, not a pattern. You are given a natural right to use words. The definitions of these words must be used properly to convey truth. If not you induce Orwellian thought processes in society.

@AttackChefDennis

Ай бұрын

And Human Beings are hardwired to detect patterns.

@justinlaboy5712

Ай бұрын

@@AttackChefDennis what’s your point?

@AttackChefDennis

Ай бұрын

@justinlaboy5712 it's a statement of fact that we are pattern recognizers. The earlier humans that didn't see patterns as well were eaten by something, so you end up with a species that thru evolution has that hardwired into them. It's where the pursuit of conspiracy theories comes from, our need for patterns.

@AlphaAchilles

Ай бұрын

@@AttackChefDennis that is partially true but mostly not. Yes, we as a species have adapted out of necessity. But we certainly did not evolve. Evolution as an origin is wildly incorrect and it doesn’t explain anything about the code in our genetics. And our genetics do not add information based on outside influences. There are always slight variations but no big ones. Macro evolution is simply not true and I guarantee you will not find one single true example of it anywhere. I should know, I spent years in college getting a degree that required me to do in debt research usually hands on on the subject. The examples they teach you in schools are either simply not true, fabricated (proven) or theory passed off as fact.

"This is the last one for the night."

I loved studying this in pre-med. I was in awe of what Watson & Crick discovered. Pretty brilliant. I learned that in the early 1970s so we’ve made some real strides since. CRISPR for example.

Not thousands of years. BILLIONS of years.

@daithiflynn1

Ай бұрын

Ah, you'll mess him up. His mind is already blown with thousands of years! He's gonna explode when he reads your comment.

@evanmarks8012

Ай бұрын

You need to watch the whole video. These scientists go on to criticize the mathematical flaws within the neo darwinism claims.

@BobbyDazzler888

Ай бұрын

200,000 or so. We were introduced.

@fireice5082

Ай бұрын

But Adam & Eve didn’t exist billions of years ago so DNA cannot be that old.

@tainicon4639

Ай бұрын

@@BobbyDazzler888the genetic code seems to have arisen once as it is shared by all living things in this planet. We can manipulate the biology and change the encoding language but this doesn’t seem to exist naturally. This just implies the number of specific chemical reactions required to set up a DNA code is sufficiently complex that it only occurred once in the past 3 billion years… or that once it occurred the competitive advantage the organisms descended from the first emergence had over an subsequent emergences millions of years later was so huge that the new systems couldn’t compete.

Can't forget Rosalind Franklin

@SerendipityChild

Ай бұрын

Christians only value the woman who was a virgin who got pregnant. Don't expect female scientists to get praise from them.

@AleksandarIvanov69

Ай бұрын

Of course you can. I already did.

I have always believed that there is invisible, super old man hiding behind clouds.

I didn't know Crick was a WWII programmer. It's fitting for him to be one of the main discoverers.

@Yaromyr21

Ай бұрын

Well he and Watson did the model the DNA shape was discovered by Rosalind Franklin with x rays

@nanban1896

Ай бұрын

As far as I am aware he wasn't, he worked for the Navy and dealt with magnetic mines.

That last sentence is key "whenever we find information, and we trace it back to its ultimate source, we always come to a mind, not to a material process". God is obviously the mind behind DNA. He is The Programmer. The Creator. Amazing. Just unreal.

@aarongiroux5416

Ай бұрын

DNA IS NOT A CODE the letters used in DNA are just abbreviations for chemicals. A stands for adenine. T stands for thymine. G stands for guanine. C stands for cytosine.

@SwordTune

Ай бұрын

God is unnecessary to explain any natural phenomenon.

@0ne239

Ай бұрын

​@SwordTune then tell me who or what created everything perfectly the first time...Once you tell me what you think did, tell me what created the thing you believe created all we know. And keep repeating the process it always comes back to a creator. Small minded people will stay on this hamster wheel we call societal thinking.

@WinstonDiaz1989

Ай бұрын

We're defenitely created by something. We call it god, some called them " engineers "

@aarongiroux5416

Ай бұрын

@@0ne239 created everything perfectly? you think the Babirusa is a perfect animal? the Babirusa has tusks that will grow back into its own skull and kill it. there is no "perfect creation" and there is no "God" how much of the bible do i need to prove to you is either factually wrong or inconsistent with an "all good God" before you will start thinking that maybe what the churches have been telling you is wrong.

You don't learn it in school because it is several levels above what you need at that time