"it's hammer tech, they always make excuses."

@madhavansowrirajan5210

3 ай бұрын

Haha

@romegottie3218

3 ай бұрын

Hell yea because Justin Hammer installed it, so any problems it had was from Hammer

@MrTimelord77

3 ай бұрын

He could've made a fully effective weapon and if the user didn't read the instructions, then that proves all weapons have the same major weakness, the wielder. Think of Hammer Tech as being a Slugworth candy, a rival company who does have some good products, but is often overshadowed by another bigger name.

@galihjati443

3 ай бұрын

Again, it's Hammertech, they always fart

@phillthomas7368

3 ай бұрын

this was funnier

I’m glad they changed it because the ex-wife failing was one of the funniest parts of the moment

@fx_1513

3 ай бұрын

Ikr

@maunud9495

3 ай бұрын

This was such a well prepared joke.

@CesoeFelony

3 ай бұрын

I would hate to hear who your favorite comedians are...

@tilltheendoftime-adventure8441

3 ай бұрын

​@@CesoeFelonyCharlie Chapman, The Three Stooges, and Richard Pryor.

@drasvader1

3 ай бұрын

They didn't change anything. All written like that.

He wants to unsecret the secrets of the secret marvel

@benjiboy8211

3 ай бұрын

🤣🤣

@mariusdrum106

3 ай бұрын

Oh that makes sense

@ToshisGarden

3 ай бұрын

So that we can marvel at the secrets of Marvel that he unsecreted?

@IFennecYouCODM

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@j.d.clayborne5556

3 ай бұрын

Think you forgot a secrets at the end there

Love how Natasha was thrown into the middle of the clip for the sake of the thumbnail! I can respect it!

@foljs5858

2 ай бұрын

respect the hustle, they need those clickbait views

@iolausbeck

2 ай бұрын

Men of culture are easily clickbaited 😅

@YT-User1013

2 ай бұрын

Only reason to click

@Maurice_Moss

2 ай бұрын

Peak Scarlett imo

@Linerunner99

2 ай бұрын

I'm like 69..... nice

Makes sense, there was also a tie in comic for Iron Man 3 where the Ten Rings got a hold of the ex wife and fired it at War Machine. Rhodey thought it would be a dud as well but he was high in the air when it hit him and literally blew up in his face.

@ShockwaveFPSStudios

3 ай бұрын

Speaking of the Ten Rings, it was kinda disappointing they showed up in the tie in comic and not the movie.

@luggilu7864

3 ай бұрын

No it doesn't. Please refer to my way to long comment for a detailed explenation

@thescruffinator8830

3 ай бұрын

@@ShockwaveFPSStudios They literally are in the movie, they're the terrorists Iron Man fights in the first movie.

@Pururut

3 ай бұрын

​@@luggilu7864 nah

Any US ordinance that is fired and has explosives in it usually has to hit a certain velocity before arms itself for that exact reason. Glad to see the movie got that part right!

@ManusiaKagakRusuh

3 ай бұрын

Because Tony and Rhodey has Stark Tech ... They doesn't need exposive or velocity to explode or destroy ... The good guys got used to having sci-fi weaponry and look down on logical ordinary weapon ...

@HollyHartwellWhite

3 ай бұрын

That's Good Argument But I smell "Excuses" Dude Even Real US Military Ordnance Have More Proper Velocity Before Arming Themselves In Fact Some weapon Makes you Able To Set your Detonation Range. HammerTech Did not Have Such feature.. It Require Long Ass Distance Before Properly Detonated. which is Impractical and Innefective.

@Stephenklein87

3 ай бұрын

@@HollyHartwellWhite With some ordnance items that's the whole point. Safe separation from blast and frag. There's an arming sequence that happens that will stop it from detonating too close. You're right about being able to adjust timing, but that's typically for specific air burst items. Source: I was an explosive ordnance disposal technician in the military.

@HollyHartwellWhite

3 ай бұрын

@Stephenklein87 Woah!!! Really??? thank you for your Service and It was Such an honor To Meet Serviceman Like You. And well That's was Something I Just Knew. So Those Adjusted Detonation Is For Air Burst Items.. but How About Mortars?? As far I Know They also Have Same mechanism, Correct?? and Yeah I'd Assume if "Ex-Wife" got a Same Mechanism To Air Burst Missile. 🤔 🤔 not Sure If I'm wrong. just trying to Hypothesize.

@___idk

3 ай бұрын

... .

The reason they deleted the original ending probably was because Rhoadey killed Whiplash but not Tony Stark.

@Knowledge12370

Ай бұрын

Or because the MCU can't let badass scenes exist and everything has to be comic relief

@Cheekiecunt

Ай бұрын

@@Knowledge12370Nah

Who came here after watching Scarlet on the thumbnail😂

@salsaspartan7

2 ай бұрын

I forgot about that. Lmao

The deleted ending he also had no armor meaning it would have killed him even if if didn't explode it had enough kinetic force to spark and ricochet of his armor meaning without armor it would have imbedded itself in his chest hitting his heart

@dragondrakage2402

2 ай бұрын

But that would be more bloody, if it explodes it keeps the movie pg13

@fluidarana3637

2 ай бұрын

I'd say it would actually go through him 😂

Good thing they deleted that ending 😂, it's wack😂😂

@juanfromcase0s

Ай бұрын

Because it wasn’t finished yet dummy

@Drakoako

Ай бұрын

It’s wack bc they didn’t put much cgi into it to try and make it better

@JoshBoadu

Ай бұрын

@@Drakoako don't reduce my intelligence to that level, that much is very obvious, I'm talking about that ending style is wack, Saving the girl once more is annoying and very generic,N it would have ruined the whole movie hence why they didn't use it,

@edwinmendez3396

29 күн бұрын

@@Drakoako yeah the cgi look bad

No, it didn't work because they decided that hammer's fail is funnier

Seems odd to make the rival's tech save the day. Better off scrapped. Possibly a fake ending to throw off spoiler leakers

@Big-Shady

3 ай бұрын

It's not There's a tie-in comic where it works on Rhodey, but he thought it wouldn't because of this scene Rhodey Canonically used it wrong, which is fucking hilarious if you ask me Be even funnier if he used it from long distance and it was still a dud

@bobfg3130

3 ай бұрын

Yes, fake ending.

@bobfg3130

3 ай бұрын

​@@Big-Shady Wrong. It's fake.

@grimsgraveyard3598

3 ай бұрын

Nah they didn't need to shit on the guys tech it worked it just wasn't as advanced as Starks. They should have made it obvious rhodie used it wrong and stark then corrected him. Like I know hammer is an asshole but his tech works and you used it wrong rhodie.

@maxord11

3 ай бұрын

Cause why would they make the main character fallible even though that's the entire premise of the film...odd, huh?

Interesting but doesn’t make sense how they both survive the explosion so narrowly imo

It’s not that when ur closer ex wife won’t work cause who is close to their ex wife

@bruno1

3 ай бұрын

😂

@ferdinandmiranda899

3 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@alejovasquez9903

Ай бұрын

That's why its called Ex-wife. You want it to be very far away.

Scarlett Johansson has nice eyes

@sergiodelrioreyes7655

Ай бұрын

Yeah but she has nothing to do with this

The deleted ending is stupid. Missiles which accelerate to extreme velocity need a correspondingly large amount of propellant, and that missile is too small.

@taiyomo5568

Ай бұрын

Too bad it’s a movie not real life

@michaelwong9411

Ай бұрын

@@taiyomo5568 The fact that it's a movie is not a license to do stupid things. Stupid things in movies insult the audience's intelligence.

@taiyomo5568

Ай бұрын

@@michaelwong9411 I think your just taking it too deep, the whole point of movies is to create a story for people to ENJOY, not analyze

@heath7589

Ай бұрын

@@michaelwong9411 it actually does, especially when u have a domain that allows you. Tonys electronic heart is able to produce 3 gigawatts.. and u have problem with it being "small"

@michaelwong9411

Ай бұрын

@@heath7589 Did you notice that all of Hammer's other weapon systems were literally just off-the-shelf guns? He doesn't operate at that level.

Wait Tony’s suit could open like that from irn man 2 itself? Thanks y’all for likes I never got this much!

@animehub1322

3 ай бұрын

Yeah

@meric12131415

3 ай бұрын

Yup he's done it a few times now it's pretty badass

@ryanpratama8061

3 ай бұрын

I remember its only after the avengers movie, tony have the "portable" armors, since "mark 7" to "mark 41".

@ashutoshroy2304

3 ай бұрын

Yeah he did it when he left Rhodes at the restaurant

@ashutoshroy2304

3 ай бұрын

Yeah he did it, when he left Rhodes at the restaurant

*This video was sponsored by Hammer Tech*

Basically the same way hellfire missiles work. In AIT they showed us tanks that had been hit with them, they just kind of cave in on themselves

@anthonygrande5293

3 ай бұрын

Hellfires use HEAT warheads (usually), so they aren’t velocity dependant to kill a target. There is a cool missile designed during the Cold War by the US though called LOSAT. Totally velocity dependant!

@abbcc5996

2 ай бұрын

@@anthonygrande5293 there is a hellfire variant with blades on it that doesnt explode at all and turns the victim into mince meat. zawahiri was killed by one

@anthonygrande5293

2 ай бұрын

@@abbcc5996 That’s true, hence why I added “(usually)”. That blade one is insane.

@milokhanh313

2 ай бұрын

more like LOSAT

TBH, anything with sufficient kinetic energy can be deadly 😂

@aidensanford228

Ай бұрын

Yeah, what the hell, so it’s basic just a railgun that shoots explosives

@superego13itch

Ай бұрын

But a kiss can be even deadlier!

@dankcraft7386

Ай бұрын

the fuck superego?!

@superego13itch

Ай бұрын

@@dankcraft7386 its from Batman Returns.

it’s like how instead of a timer fuse like on a hand grenade 40mm grenade launcher rounds have an rpm switch basically after firing X rpm is required before the charge is armed so if you point blanked someone with a 40mm grenade itd still hurt as it’s going around 250-290 kph at max but it wouldn’t explode granted they’re all wearing suits made from metal so if you say shot a 40mm point blank itd probably be like chucking a stone at a tank the ex wife probably works off a similar idea where unless X condition whether the condition is speed, rotations, air pressure or something else the charge will not arm the arming conditions for these systems are to ensure that when the ammunition is smashed around in combat it won’t go off and that if a negligent discharge occurs the full destructive capability of the round won’t blow friendlys up

You clicked because of Scarlett. Dont lie.

we all know why it's called the EX WIFE😂

If you want to use hammer tech you need to proof you worth 😂 OMG: thanks for 100 likes🔥

@KayhoticGames

2 ай бұрын

Little babies editing their comments thanking for likes is so cringe

I didn’t know this channel was sponsored by Hammer Tech

It also probably has a minimum arming distance for the explosive charge, to provide safety to anyone outside an ironman suit who might be working along side them, or might be using the weapon system without a suit. This is standard on most grenade launcher rounds for example.

@Froggyman145

2 ай бұрын

Kinetic weapons and torpedoes do in fact have safety measures to ensure they can't detonate until they're a certain distance from their launch point

Bro that deleted scene definitely seemed a lot better

That black widow cameo is so sexy and beautiful!

Excuses, it failed because it's hammer tech

@Ghost7065

3 ай бұрын

A y true Marvel fan knows your comment is 100% correct.

@HollyHartwellWhite

3 ай бұрын

Indeed.

@adamfadillah3362

3 ай бұрын

Nah hammer doesnt make the best weapon but you gotta put credit where its due

Literally anything, when accelerated to the correct speed, can destroy literally everything.

Hammer also said it's supposed to be used to busting bunkers, that means it doesn't explode on impact, it needs to penetrate and dig in before detonating, which wouldn't work without the acceleration nor on the armour

I honestly like the deleted ending better than the final version

@ihavenoname-qm8nr

3 ай бұрын

He couldve used any other weapon to kill him, something safer. Its better that its deleted.

@LileeLee

3 ай бұрын

Same thing I said

@HarperChisari

3 ай бұрын

Makes sense why they flew out how they did too

@TheUncivilizedNation

3 ай бұрын

@@ihavenoname-qm8nr well if we’re going to apply logic into this War Machine is a perfect counter to Whiplash because he those guns would shred through him. A kinetic sidewinder missile is overkill

@gioponce7788

Ай бұрын

That shit looked fake AF wtf

Dude I’m glad they made the decision to use the seriousness of their lives as a means to crack a joke

This was a great video props for showing the clip

Thanks for clearing the confusion.

I believe that the beauty of nature is unmatched.

It’s technobabble. A kinetic kill weapon is a high mass projectile fired at a high velocity, much like the DU sabot round fired by Abram’s. They don’t need RDX or any other kind of explosive. They rely simply on F=MA to poke holes in armor.

These movie are pure gold when u enter in completely wasted phase 4 and 5 (Except some movies and series)

The small explosion still makes me think it didn’t work. Hammer said it could destroy bunkers and everything around it, barely blew up a sidewalk. I’m sure an enclosed space is what it’s designed for but it was still such a small explosion…

I think thats why Tony is a genius, because he was able to put in more firepower in smaller missiles which could in itself had better lauching devices.

I love how they randomly throw words to make something sound very "tech". Like pay attention to what hammar is saying😂 it makes no sense

Dang it, now I wanna rewatch the Iron man trilogy🤣

That deleted scene be looking like current Disney marvel movies lol

The Ex-Wife had me dying 😂

Actually you can see that motor ran out when it hit the target, so maximum velocity was reached

This is like an answer i never knew i needed, i never questioned why the missile didnt work, always thought it was just faulty but now i know

So Fortnite did use Tony clothes from Ironman 2

And for some reason people in the comments didn't believe the unfinished CGI models weren't real. Or because of those unfinished CGI models that the video wasn't real? Something like that. Bro it's so baffling in the comments in the full video. Because it clearly is real, it's just that the CGI is unfinished because they deleted it.🤦

Nice edit at the end , 😢

TL;DR: this missile is physically impossible to make for an even slightly effective weapon. Edit: looking at it again, it looks like a its possibly even shorter than a VOG and has about the same diameter) No its because what he said makes absolutely no god damn sense. Kinetic kill means it relies on a projectile moving fast penetrating the armor and causing damage inside the vehicle by spalling, or fragmenting by the impact force. Rounds like this include APFSDS shells in modern tanks, or apc or apcbc rounds in older anti tank guns. A sidewinder is an infra red guided anti aircraft missile. Most commonly these are launched from jet-aircraft, or helicopters, but varients have been tested to use them as sams. (I am aware that they tested it against tanks as well, with a modified version). These are guided missiles with a proximity fuze. (The type of proximity fuze depends on the model). He also states that it uses rdx and a bunch if other gobbledygook, meaning, its not a kinetic kill weapon, but a missile relying on an explosion after oenetration is achieved. Rounds like these can be found in ww2 tanks (aphe) and even the T-55. Now, if this thing is meant to destroy a bunker, youd need quite a bit of rdx. If it is meant to oenetrate said bunker too, and not just fly into a firing port the cap needs to be very strong, and the missile needs to be very fast. Now lets look at the missile. Its about the size and shape if a VOG. These are fired by the russian AGS series of automatic grenade launchers, and can easily be dropped by drones. These are 30mm. Lets give him some unreasonable leeway and instead use the 40mm he grenade as a reference. This grenade has about 48g of CompA5. I have no idea what tnt equivalent that would be. But ive worked with 40mm grenades and their effects can be rather underwhelming when you are expecting movie explosions. But in a bunker, youd probably stand a good chance at killing an occupant. The issue is. The 40mm HE round is an he round only. For more effect youd want an HE-F(ragmentation) round. Hammer does not mention a fragmentation effect so we should rule that out, as it would be unreasonable not to mention this very important factor. The 40mm he round also does not need space for a rocket engine. It is also not armor piercing. The M433 HEDP is. When we tested it against steel plates it punched a whole straight through both with energy to spare. Mind tho, this is a shape charge. Basically a miniature RPG warhead. So the kill radius is smaller than on HE-F rounds. Now. Lets assume 40mm and the kength of a VOG + a little bit, just to give hammer as much of a chance as possible. You would need the explosive filler, the cap, the rocket engine, the guidance system (hammer speaks of a smart rocket, so a guidance system seems to be included), and the mechanization for the guidance system. Lets assume thrust vectoring, since there are no guidance fins visible. How traget acquisition would work is beyond me, as there does not seem to be any option for a tv seaker, a heat seeker or a receptor for laser designation, as the cap and body are entirely metal. This leaves you all with hardly any soace to fit explosives. So even if you were to punch through a bunker, youd do little to no damage inside. That is, if you were to punch through. The missile is so small, and light, that it would need to go VERY VERY VERY fast to pull this off. Please if someone reads this whose better at maths than me, lemme know how much a, lets say (and i am exaggerating here) 1.5kg projectile would need to go to go through a meter of reinforced concrete. The launch mechanism however holds the missile in place for a good two seconds. So given the size of that missile at least half of its fuel is burnt without achieving any acceleration. Fine, i can live with that, afterall it needs to achieve zero-zero launch capability. (Zero altitude, zero speed before launch). So the remaining fuel would need to accelerate the missile to many times the speed of sound. As we can see, that is not achieved on a distance as short as the one chosen by rhodey. Given the small amount kf soace for fuel, it is unlikely that the rocket engine itself would remain powered for much longer than that tho. And even if it had, theres a much better chance it would just shatter upon impact, due to its weight. There is no mention of any super dense materials. But even with tungsten or depleted uranium for the cap, it leaves us with the same result. Just by its design, this thing physically and logically cannot penetrate a bunker, it cannot be a smart rocket, it cannot be a guided missile, and it cannot achieve great lethality unless it is an HE-F projectile. And at that point just use 40mm the US military already fields a veriety of these systems. From personal grenade launchers like the M-320, which, like the M-203 can be mounted on a standard issue rifle, to beasts like the MK-19 automatic grenade launcher and a few oddities like the MGL, or the awesome because retro M-79 in the middle. Now it wouldnt be unheard of for militaries to invest insane ammounts of money into projects that dont work, just to realize that they already have something better. But what im trying to say, THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY FOR THE EX-WIFE TO WORK. the biggest sin here, is that someone with rhodeys background didnt immediately smell bullshit when hammer whipped it out. You have a worse version of a weapon you are likely already familiar with, that you can fire once, and if you miss an unarmored target with it by more than a meter, your chances of even having any shrapnel hitting him, are going towards zero.

@yousufkhan1720

Ай бұрын

I wanna come back to this and read it so someone like my comment or sum

Sidewinders that small will never produce the needed speed to burst a bunket. It's not like hammer is hyperbolic about his weapons and is a snake oil sales man when selling his weapons to ppl...oh wait he is

Nice edit

I loved this movie man, people hated on it and I was like ?? DJ/AM in it too. Banger.

Reminds me of the LOSAT missile. It was a prototype supersonic kinetic kill anti-tank missile, and had a minimum kill range. The penetration would increase the further the target was away from it, rather than the usual anti-tank round losing penetration over distance. It never left the prototype stage though.

The hammer tech joke was perfect

In easier term, that is a gyrojet bullet

chitty chat sounds like an excuse cat

If it requires long distance than in close combat is useless and takes up space where something more effective can be put. Like a literal gun

Supposingly in a military and a civil presentation, you don't need to put live ammunition in piece because someone might missfire (or rogue drones in this movie). Like in Robocop 2, Robo-Cain has weapons lock as he uses the M134 to Murphy.

Everything is deadly with enough speed, so...

-Hammer? -Hammer.

That and weapons like the exwife similar to RPGS and gernade launchers wont arm until they are a certain distance from the shooter. They use the number of revolutions the round makes to determine distance.

Even the deleted scene is hammer tech quality

Finally something we never knew

The round failed because it was hammer tech, which is second-rate tech

y iron man at last is like iron box😂😂

THANK YOU. I've been tryna explain this to everyone for years.

Hammer tech prolly sponsoring this channel

'Kinetic kill' means it is precise enough to actually _hit_ its intended target, rather than getting "close enough" and then using the explosion to do the damage.

Nice editing

nice edit

Bro the CGI at the end😫

They accelerate on impact.

I always figured the hammer tech thing was because if it was a stark industry missile, it would’ve been going fast enough immediately from the launcher. StarkTech doesn’t have a minimum range

Now that makes sense, since side winders are actually used in fighter jets..

@ManusiaKagakRusuh

3 ай бұрын

That's why Hammer Tech is inferior ... They still using real life stuff for their weapon, still bounded by logic ... While Stark Tech ignore logic and can make anything they want like a sci-fi technology ...

i love how the unfinished CGI from these films looks like the finished CGI of MCU movies today

scarlett johanson in iron man 2 was especially gorgeous. god damn

The last scene felt very animated.

Thank you for getting this right! I’ve seen some of your vids and was less than impressed. Keep this up and you’ll go far!

Scarlet Johanson was really hot in iron man 2, fr 🥵💯

Amazing

Because Rhodey learns from his mistakes 😂

Cgi of deleted scene is priceless 😂

Rhodey not realizing it has a minimum arming distance is hilarious lol

Huh I didn’t know marvel had that good cgi I mean just look at the graphics in the last cene

We need the iron man 2 version of war machine's suit to come back. Nobody will ever convince me that there is a better suit than that lol

Well no shit … EVERYTHING dangerous coming at you at a high speed

In Luke Cage, they use a scaled down version of the Ex-Wife tipped with alien metal recovered from New York to try and kill Luke Cage The round is a gyrojet explosive round, where initial low velocity impact allows the alien metal tip to slice through armor without flattening the bullet. Then an afterburner pushes the round deeper inside the target where it detonates. A weapon designed to kill Iron Man

Nah youre secretly a hammer tech employee 😂

Ok, now I kinda want a version of the entire movie with the level of special effects they used in the deleted ending.

First he is wearing armor, then the second one he did not😅

I always thought I just grown tired of Superhero movies. But seeing that clip I am starting to think they really were just way better back then.

Well it does make sense, some missiles, mortar and grenades need a certain amount of time in the air to speen and activate the charge, for safety reasons.

Extra distance wouldn’t give it more acceleration. Velocity and acceleration are different

I forget this is how black window is introduced to the mcu. I don’t think anyone was ready for Scarlett Johansson to be such a honey pot for tony to distract and spy on him. Hot damn

Reminds of when shield used hammer tech in an iron man show once and fury claimed to never trust hammer tech again.

They did Hammer dirty. Should have kept the original ending. That'll set Hammer up as a threat, maybe even one of the main villains down the road. Then we'll have even more movies

Came for natasha, stayed for guntech. Saw natasha - mission achieved :)

I just love how its called the ex wife

The scene in the end is what I thought of marvel movies nowadays