Yes it did. Spewing energy and mater from either another section of our larger and eternal universe (beyond what we call observable), or from another universe (black hole ripping through the fabric of one, ejecting as a white hole into another).

You should really credit Brian Cox in the video at 4:57 to 7:12, like you do Rovelli.

I like Carlo Rovelli, his books are amazing to read, and deeply thought provoking, he comes across as a scientist with poetic, imaginative insight. Thank you for this intriguing video.

Yes. Think “The Great Attractor” to get a rough idea. There is even a Very Large dipole signature in the CMB. Really one of the coolest theories out there. Seems many people have independently came up with it or heard from someone I’m not aware. But some fail to take it further and acknowledge the possibility of a cyclic Universe... Torus shaped.

Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is one aspect of dilation. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. Dilation is the original and correct explanation for why we cannot see light from our own galactic center. It can be shown mathematically that dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate that we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for dark matter, the missing mass is dilated mass. Einstein wrote about dilation occurring in "large clusters of stars" which is basically a very low mass galaxy. For a galaxy to have no/low dilation it must have very, very low mass (or low mass in its center). It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter. For the same reason binary stars will always have predictable rotation rates. What we see in modern astronomy has been known since 1925. This is when the existence of galaxies was confirmed. It was clear that there should be an astronomical quantity of light emanating from our own galactic center. It wasn't until the 1960's when television and movies started to popularize black holes did the concept slowly became mainstream.

@VikingTeddy

4 ай бұрын

Seemingly very few scientists believed in a physical singularity. From what I've understood, It was just such a mind bending idea that it got widely repoted in popular media, leading normies like me to believe it was an established hypothesis.

@shawns0762

4 ай бұрын

Yes, it's always been a stubbornly persistent fictional term. The recent discovery that very, very low mass galaxies have normal star rotation rates is virtual proof that dilation is occurring in common spiral galaxies. This is the obvious explanation for the "missing mass" problem.@@VikingTeddy

@Scissors69

4 ай бұрын

In 2020, Roger Penrose won a Nobel Prize for “The Singularity Theorem” for *proving* that “Black Hole formation is a robust prediction of Einstein’s general theory of relativity”

@shawns0762

4 ай бұрын

General Relativity predicts dilation not singularities. It's the reason Planck, Einstein, Dirac, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Bohr, Feynman and every other physicists between 1925 and 1960 didn't believe in singularities. Dilation explains dark matter. It also explains the CMB. If the WMAP satellite was positioned outside the bounds of our galaxy it would record a background radiation of zero or near zero. @@Scissors69

@user-hz6cx3zh1y

2 ай бұрын

@@Scissors69 even mainstream is questioning singularities now. ‘Roy Kerr’

This video is a mind-bending exploration of some of the most profound questions about the cosmos. Carlo Rovelli's insights into the possibility of a white hole creating our universe are both enlightening and thought-provoking. It's remarkable how he breaks down complex scientific concepts into digestible and fascinating explanations. The way this video delves into cosmic mysteries and theories is truly engaging. It leaves viewers with a sense of wonder about the vastness and intricacies of the universe. Carlo Rovelli's passion for the subject matter is palpable and contagious, making this a must-watch for anyone curious about the origins of our universe. Kudos to the creators for delivering such an intellectually stimulating and captivating video! 👏🌌🧠

We know space time is affected by collisions of BH & neutron stars Further more Space time is denser around large clumps of matter like galaxies. My theory is BH suck in space time for eons this explains the thinning of space time between galaxies and we perceive this as expansion When the the balance hits a critical point of space time verses matter and all hell breaks loose as a white hole

So what is it?

Yep.

More of an expansion and less of an explosion. If you can't get that right, everything that follows feels purely speculative.

Don't ever let anyone tell you that anything is 'settled science'.

Oh no! Soon we will be arguing over which one is better the white hole or the black hole🤔 cosmic thinking.

Sí sí yo creo eso pero no sabemos si sea real o es un truco dice Chus y creo en eso

You always say this great event happened in space that created the universe but you never ask where the space came from. Space is just as much an object as form.

@heliogenesi

5 ай бұрын

They ask that very obvious question all the time.

@duran9664

5 ай бұрын

No such thing as space 🤏There is NO space without time. Solve the time puzzle rule the existence🤏 Time is truly the engineers/creator secret.

@duran9664

5 ай бұрын

Photon of light doesn’t feel time. It just exists. So space itself is relative & not only time 🤏

@kodeone

4 ай бұрын

@@voraciousfredsure thing. Space is clear and timeless. Yet dynamic in its creativity. Like a clear screen displaying the universe within it, on it. Space being uncreated is most certainly god. And its creation is the display of what we call reality or the phenomenal universe. Without the primal creative space there could be no form. And without form there would be nothing. I call it the nondual space-form reality. Because emptiness / space is dynamic and purely intelligent it is bound to create / manifest itself as a universe. Thanks for your comment.

@BennyBsolo

4 ай бұрын

@kodeone I don't think you are learning anything from these videos.

In another universe, you wrote this comment

Um, the other end of a black hole is the white hole... 🤷

@user-hz6cx3zh1y

2 ай бұрын

They literally show a white hole connected to a black hole but fail to acknowledge it. GR even says a whitehole should exist even though that theory is mostly nonsense. 😊

Black hole meets white hole?

Happy Merry Christmas & Happy New Year ~ 2024 ~ ! 💝 💯 👏 🎉 🎃 🙏 🚀 👍 🤖 🎅 ✝ 🎄 🌝 !

So….then did a white hole create our universe!?

Hmmm 2 comments missing already, I wonder what thoughts are being suppressed

????

Since it's not an implosion or an explosion, wouldn't a better name fo the 'Big Bang' be a Displosion?

Pure science fiction ours imagination knows any boundaries just the creation in our mind and speculation ( anyone's can do it)

God bless similarity reverse golden rose boom and never heard of it before I was dead on earth today justification justice ⚖️ I don't know if there's anyone else in the world 🌎 there's no way of getting the glory of Jesus Christ almighty salvation lord judge Messiah beautiful spirit thank you god

No. Brian Cox created the Universe.

@jorgenoriega9152

5 ай бұрын

Everything and anyone can do it in they own imagination ( so simple)

@cordoroy9515

4 ай бұрын

@albin2232 The scottish actor?! Geezo, what a guy.

If we don't observe, it doesn't exist 😉

No, it was just your mom farting. XD

Black hole is a downward triangle like a female. While hole is a upward triangle like a man. So, when we combine them, we have a STAR with 6 spokes. Ahh.. now I understand why son of Shiva (man) & Shakti (female) is called Shanmukha (six faces) / Karthikeya (Cluster of six).

@__cypher__

3 ай бұрын

This is about astrophysics. Not astrology or mythology

@akash_menon

3 ай бұрын

@@__cypher__ - I know. But personifications by our ancestors helps us today to understand why did so, when things become more clear nowadays with scientific advance. Ex. Sun's chariot with 7 horses was one of the fastest. Now we know, sunlight can be spilt into 7 colours & indeed sunlight is one of the fastest.

White hole is the stupidest idea I have ever heard of 🤪

@franklewis9405

5 ай бұрын

Are you not familiar with religion that shit is just an excuse for not learning anything

A white hole 😅. How dumb are we prepared to be in our desperation to deny that God made and sustains it all?

@thinkbeyond3457

5 ай бұрын

There is no evidence for that at all. All of science would be happy to see these caveman fairytales as real if there was evidence they were.

@wingzero7316

5 ай бұрын

Science deals with the natural world, physical evidence and able to prove and disprove things. God cannot be tested by science, god is supernatural and outside the natural world.

@giannisgreek8862

5 ай бұрын

God?😅😂

@thinkbeyond3457

5 ай бұрын

@@voraciousfred no god didn't. A human wrote that into a fictional book saying that a god said it.

@TunaFreeDolphinMeat

5 ай бұрын

So, by definition, God is responsible for the pain and suffering experienced by innocent children who die of cancer? If God is omnipotent, can He create a rock that He can not lift?

So what is it?