DESIGN /TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT & EVALUATION SIMPLIFIED | A LEVEL PHILOSOPHY & ETHICS

Hi guys,
Welcome back!
Today, I just did a quick recap with evaluations and criticisms of the Teleological Argument/ Design Argument and how to go about answering questions on this topic.
Hope you find this helpful!
If you have any questions, ask below in the comments and I’ll get back to you as soon as possible.
- Design Argument AS OCR Philosophy
- Teleological Argument AS OCR Philosophy
#Alevels #Aquainas #philosophy #intelligentdesign

Пікірлер: 39

  • @oscarswire9696
    @oscarswire96963 жыл бұрын

    Got my final tomorrow, this and a sprinkle of luck should be enough.

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad you found it helpful! Good luck with it all tomorrow 🙌🏾

  • @kishanpopat6313
    @kishanpopat63132 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating point mentioned on the anthropic principle

  • @gracecrocker7856
    @gracecrocker78562 жыл бұрын

    you are the biggest lifesaver and the only person i fully understand. THANK YOU

  • @LaraTang
    @LaraTang2 жыл бұрын

    Hey! Thank you so so much! This is life saving! It is A level season right now and I'm struggling to revise even though my A levels have already started because of my neurodiversity. This video makes it a lot easier for me to learn because I can just hear you talk and take notes and it kind of eliminates the pressure I put on myself about revising and makes revising less daunting! Thank you so much! Also you are so wonderful! What are you doing now? I hope life is treating you well anyway. You seem like a great and smart person :))

  • @uknown2402
    @uknown24024 жыл бұрын

    Omg I’m doing this course now and honestly seems like ur my guide to pass!! Honeslyy could you go through the year2 ethics including a topic like meta-ethics and conscience of Freud and Aquinas

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Heyy, Hope you’re finishing the course okay ? I will definitely do Year 2 topics

  • @uknown2402

    @uknown2402

    4 жыл бұрын

    abs.tract_ thanks too youuu!!! ❤️❤️❤️💫 Yh it’s super stressful

  • @detroitbecomebeyonce8321
    @detroitbecomebeyonce83212 жыл бұрын

    GIRLLLL DO MORE TOPICS. THIS IS AMAZINF

  • @olivekeren454
    @olivekeren4544 жыл бұрын

    Omg I love your hair 😩😍😍

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Olive Keren Thank you!!! 🥰

  • @emmatyerman5072
    @emmatyerman50722 жыл бұрын

    thankyou this was really helpful!

  • @alexfacchino1608
    @alexfacchino16083 жыл бұрын

    Please can you create another great video on the problem of evil or differnt ethics, thank you so much! This was soooo helpful

  • @miawade2182
    @miawade21823 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much this was so helpful 😭💜 I'm doing my AS exam for this next week and I didn't know which ones to use to link together. This was such a big help💕

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Heyy, you’re welcome 😊 Thanks for watching & best of luck in your upcoming AS! 🙌🏾

  • @temifagbamila2538
    @temifagbamila25384 жыл бұрын

    Your the reason I now believe I can succeed in RE.🥳 thank you and I would loveeee a video on Freud and conscience

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Heyy, Ofcourse you can succeed in RE! You need to put in the work and efforts too x Yes, I’m really trying to put out as much content as I can. However it’s exam season in uni at the moment. If you drop me an email for a specific question and your plan for Conscience, I can have a look and alter if need be. Hope this helps x

  • @hollyclay3675
    @hollyclay36754 жыл бұрын

    Great video thank you❤️

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Holly Clay Glad this was of help! 🥰

  • @josiemiles1210
    @josiemiles12102 жыл бұрын

    Thank you so much this was literally so helpful!! Xx

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    2 жыл бұрын

    Glad you found it helpful!

  • @Iamapeiron7
    @Iamapeiron72 жыл бұрын

    Another issue with the teleological argument, is that it works as much for a single creator, as it does for 2, 3, 10, or even 100 creators. Plus, it doesn't negate the fact that a creator can also have another creator. Sure you can avoid the infinite regress, but nothing prevents 2, 3 or 10 phases of creation, where a creator has another creator, and that one has another, till the 10th order, with a first cause.

  • @nodrvgs

    @nodrvgs

    2 ай бұрын

    ooh I never thought of this! This is such a brilliant point

  • @uknown2402
    @uknown24024 жыл бұрын

    I’m gladdd your doing this cuz I have got a mock next week on this 🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️ and it’s just to hard to focus on 3 themes and them being critiqued by smaller scholars #IMSOOSTRESSEDOUTT

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    UKNOWN // Heyy, I’m glad to be of help! Just keep in mind it’s not a scholar name dropping exam. The smaller scholars can be helpful just ensure you know the key scholars. Stress is normal during exam period. However, it is how you manage it that is important. I wish you the best of luck in your exams! 🙏🏾

  • @uknown2402

    @uknown2402

    4 жыл бұрын

    abs.tract_ OMG thankyou soo much 💕🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @samiraadan2418
    @samiraadan24183 жыл бұрын

    Omg this video honestly helped so much! Would you be able to do more videos like like on more topics!

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Glad you found it helpful! I might do in the future

  • @gabrielleodell5929
    @gabrielleodell59293 жыл бұрын

    THANK YOU IM ABT TO GO INTO A PHILOSOPHY EXAM

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Best of luck with it! 🙌🏾

  • @mintoverdose7399
    @mintoverdose73993 жыл бұрын

    please make a video on Aristotle and Plato i appreciate these videos so so much thank you!!

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Heyy, I’ll try to make one of that too!

  • @drumptydumpty1540
    @drumptydumpty15403 жыл бұрын

    That was a really good presentation, thank you. 👍🏾 Do you think that if you came upon a watch, having never seen one, or heard about one, you would still conclude it was created for a purpose. Even though you have no idea what that purpose is? If yes, then is it reasonable to assume this cosmos is created for a purpose, without knowing why it was created, how it was created, or it’s purpose?

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    That’s an interesting question! If I had never seen one, I don’t think I would conclude it was made for the purpose of telling time but I personally would think it had a purpose - just one I don’t know. It’s definitely reasonable to make that assumption. After all there are a lot of things out there that have a purpose that I simply don’t know what that purpose is. I personally think the teleological argument has a lot of flaws and the use of the watch to the cosmos is such a huge leap.

  • @drumptydumpty1540

    @drumptydumpty1540

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@abs.tract_ Thanks for replying. It’s good to see a young person taking an interest in subject matters like these. I wish you success in your studies. You’re correct, nothing can empirically prove God is the origin of the material world. But equally nothing can prove empirically that any watch was the product of an intelligent mind, unless we see the agent make the watch. Even then it could be argued that the person making the watch is merely copying the result of natural forces acting upon the Earth. The point is, the notion that a watch is the product of an intelligent agent, does not come about through empirical evidence. It comes about through utilising ones innate intelligence. Indeed that is what all humans have at their disposal, to discriminate between truth or illusion. Another point to consider, regarding the teleological argument that is always overlooked by those arguing against it, is the subject of the discussion. God. How can they conclude that God is a leap of knowledge, if they don’t know who and/or what God is? How is it a leap of knowledge, if God ( as understood) is the origin of the material world? If they don’t agree that is what God is, then what are they prepared to agree to? In closing, it seems to me that belief, or lack of belief, has to play a role in understanding ones conclusion. Non/ belief, and belief are simply 2sides of the same coin. Not that non-belief is the default we all must work from

  • @hans8025
    @hans80253 жыл бұрын

    Good video my friend.What's your take on the problem of induction from a purely empirical framework?

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Induction from purely empirical framework is often criticised as a leap. Because we observe patterns doesn’t always mean there is a “greater” reason or being behind. Induction to can be very subjective too depending on individual experiences. What one person sees as order can be disorder to another person. The human experience can be argued to be fallible. For example, In a desert when the senses are compromised, the eyes sees a mirage and immediately translates it as water based on fatigue and thirst. To me, those are the problems that can be raised.

  • @nadya2105
    @nadya21054 жыл бұрын

    what about humes criticism- doesnt matter i had to continue to watch

  • @abs.tract_

    @abs.tract_

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nadya 210 I mentioned it around the midpoint section section