Great visualization and explanation! One thing to suggest as others have mentioned is to lower the audio of the background music. Otherwise, this is an excellent video and I hope you make more!

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback :).

When people say underrated they normally mean they like your content but this is very very underrated, I hope that you will soon get the attention you deserve

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you :)!! More videos coming soon!

You might want to re-mix the sound on this video and set the music lower. It's hard to hear what you are saying in several places because of the music being too loud.

@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones

10 ай бұрын

Would you consider leaving on a red cloth regular table lamp in the bedroom and a tubular vintage oval bulb desk lamp in the office, and seeing which type of bulb burns out first after a while, "doing an experiment" ?

@MathPhysicsEngineering

10 ай бұрын

I got the same response for my videos :) :) :)

@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones

10 ай бұрын

@@MathPhysicsEngineering Would you consider leaving on a red cloth regular table lamp in the bedroom and a tubular vintage oval bulb desk lamp in the office, and seeing which type of bulb burns out first after a while, "doing an experiment" ?

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback :) - noted, I will ensure this is balanced better for future videos. Didn't think it was too bad when posting, but on re-listening the background music could definitely do with toning down slightly in places.

@tylerbakeman

8 ай бұрын

I’m using my iphone speakers (not headphones or external speakers). It wasn’t an issue for me personally.

Interesting presentation! 😊

@ChemEfy

14 күн бұрын

Thank you :)! Glad you enjoyed it!

Thank you for those amazing visualizations!

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Glad you like them! :)

Excellent video! Chemical engineering PhD student here.

@ChemEfy

11 ай бұрын

Thank you :) !! Hope the PhD is going well - I see you're doing it in photochemical nitrate processes from your vid? Sounds very fascinating!

@javiercorreapr9977

10 ай бұрын

Retired PE in Chemical Engineering with career focused now on fishing…always found these fascinating

@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones

10 ай бұрын

You leave on 2 table lamps with 2 different kind of bulbs. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first after a while and how long it takes for each one. Would you consider this example to be a scientific experiment ?

@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones

10 ай бұрын

@@javiercorreapr9977You leave on 2 table lamps with 2 different kind of bulbs. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first after a while and how long it takes for each one. Would you consider this example to be a scientific experiment ?

@javiercorreapr9977

10 ай бұрын

@@tacoexpressSEEDEEholeeveryones Hi. Sounds like reliability engineering testing but maybe not. Regards

One of the best video's on the topic! It's a shame it hasn't been seen more but this easily has a million views in its future!

@ChemEfy

4 ай бұрын

Thank you :)!! Glad you enjoyed the video!

Thanks for clearing the confusion

@ChemEfy

11 ай бұрын

No problem, I'm happy the video has helped! :)

Awesome and amazing. Great overview. Thanks. (I'm a subscriber now)

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

I'm very happy you found it useful, and thank you for subscribing - more videos coming soon!

Great information:noisy, loud music makes what is said hard to hear.

@ChemEfy

11 ай бұрын

I'm glad you found the video informative! Big thank you for your feedback, will defo bear this in mind going forward :).

First, I think it's quite admirable of wanting to explain something as complicated as Navier-Stokes to the layman. However, I do think you do skip over important groundwork that prevent people from truly grasping what these equations say; yes, in essence, Navier-Stokes are just Newton's laws applied to fluids, but why certain terms are analogous is not at all obvious and requires one to understand what those operators really mean. You are already working with some pretty neat visualisations; perhaps build more on that and use it to explain what those expressions mean; nobody needs to understand how to calculate the divergence, curl, etc. in order to understand what ∇u represents. Finally, in order to talk about discrete solutions, I think it's important to lay down what differential equations are and how you'd go about solving them numerically; I don't think it's needed to talk about Eulerian (i.e. grid-based) solutions in order to show how we can still use Navier-Stokes despite having no exact solutions.

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for your comment and feedback, both positive and negative. It was definitely a balancing act re. the content as to what to include and what not to include. Indeed some loose jumps on pre-requisite knowledge for full mathematical understanding are made for sake of keeping the video within a manageable length especially given the limited evening time after work to make them. The examples you give are very pertinent + clear so thank you for this 😊 - there is certainly a strong argument to be made for including what you mention. Just to mention my perspective when making, for me the link between operators and Navier Stokes was never easily explicit, with vorticity (via curl), and divergence (via flux/continuity equation) not having an explicit physically intuitive link into the final form of the simplified momentum balance. Perhaps I could’ve weaved this in though instead of leaving for another video. The grid-based approach was mentioned to link to a more typical solution method employed in CFD/intuitively demonstrate how a velocity profile can be built up in 2D/3D. I will definitely bear your suggestions in mind going forward though - thank you once again😊.

excellent, kindly tell me which software you use for your virtualization

@jawad9757

10 ай бұрын

Prolly manim

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

So it depends on what it is that's being animated but I use a mixture of different softwares - manim, powerpoint etc. Hope this helps :)

the music is very loud, please turn it off or quieter in the next vids. Besides that, it's a very clear explanation thanks

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you, and yes I'll lower the music volume for future vids :).

From where do you get the time derivative of the pressure? The time derivative of the pressure doesn't appear in Navier-Stokes equations.

@ChemEfy

2 ай бұрын

You're absolutely right - there isn't a time derivative of pressure in Navier Stokes, and I don't believe there is one in the video either.

@jostpuur

2 ай бұрын

From where do you get the values of the pressure for different time values, when we don't have the time derivative?

@ChemEfy

2 ай бұрын

@@jostpuur In a number of contexts typically the pressure field is something you measure with pressure sensors or predict/forecast. In other situations the pressure field is computed along with the velocity field too.

What do you use for edit?

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

I use Shotcut to edit at the moment :).

@ianthehunter3532

10 ай бұрын

@@ChemEfy You think it could be done with PowerPoint?

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

@@ianthehunter3532 Hmm, I can't say I'm very familiar with Powerpoint's video editor so I think someone else could probably give you a better answer. Based on my experiences, which admittedly could be a lot broader, I think some of it could be edited on powerpoint - depends what you're trying to make. If in doubt, visualize what you're trying to make and give it a try would be my take :).

lower the music it's hard to hear your voice

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for the feedback, I've responded to similar comments on this front. Will ensure balancing issues are not an issue for future videos :).

You might want to consider re-uploading the video with balanced audio. It has good quality, but as others have already pointed out, it’s unfortunately hard to hear you speaking.

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment and feedback on the quality. I didn't think the audio balancing was too big of an issue on uploading, but on re-listening there are several places in particular where the vocal audio gets partially overpowered. I don't plan on re-uploading the video as I allude to in my responses to similar comments - I will ensure no future video has this balancing issue though :).

Kinda thought that thumbnail was a block from Minecraft

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

:)

Why is the music so loud???

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback :) - didn't think it was too bad when uploading, but on re-listening it does need toning down in places. Will ensure this is not a problem for future videos :).

I have solutions to all of the millennium prize problems I'm just waiting for them to raise the price

@empireempire3545

10 ай бұрын

:D :D :D

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Sounds like you're sitting on a jackpot! :)

Why the music...?

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the feedback! :)

The music is way louder than the voice, please lower it a bit, for the rest, great explanation

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thank you, and yes I'll lower the music volume for future vids :).

I loved the video, next time have a purse and think moments, edgerunner

@ChemEfy

11 ай бұрын

Thank you, I'm happy you enjoyed it! :) You make an excellent suggestion - will bear in mind for future videos - thank you!

Wait i thought Navier-Stokes equations model all fluids, not just newtonian-incompressible case? O_O

@purzer5161

10 ай бұрын

the most general form of navier stokes is all fluids, this video uses a simplfed version

@MuitaMerdaAoVivo

10 ай бұрын

To model non-newtonian fluids and compressible fluids, you have to keep viscosity and specific mass inside the vector operators, since they are functions of space and time. The only real limitation of Navier-Stokes lies in the continuum hypothesis, when this hypothesis fail, you have to use statistical mechanics.

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Very pertinent comment :) - as others have already commented in reply, if I lift the incompressible, newtonian, isothermal assumptions you'll get a more general version of Navier Stokes which can apply to a wider range of fluids. I quote a common simplification of this general form in the video. In reality, the viscous term has the potential to house a more complex relation (e.g. a Non-Newtonian fluid like shear-thinning, shear thickening, Bingham plastic etc.); viscosity/density will not be constants and will vary with temperature/local concentration variations as the video mentions in the latter half, amongst other things which can complicate the equation set. Hope this helps :)

Can you lower the music please and re-upload? For a non native, it’s very difficult to hear what you’re saying. Thanks!

@ChemEfy

10 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment :). I don't plan on re-uploading the video as I allude to in my responses to similar comments - I will ensure no future video has this balancing issue with the music though :). Hope this is ok!

Lower the background music...

@ChemEfy

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for the feedback, I've responded to similar comments on this front. Will ensure balancing issues are not an issue for future videos :).

@rostamr4096

5 ай бұрын

Other wise great and helpful video@@ChemEfy

@ChemEfy

5 ай бұрын

@@rostamr4096 Thank you! I'm glad you found it useful :)