As a former theistic evolutionist, I was taught all the things you mentioned and more. Took tests on them in grade school and college. Studied hard to make good grades. Only when I was challenged by an old small rural church preacher, did I question the secular "gospel" that I was taught. Thinking of all those years, I had wasted defending fakes and falsehoods. (sigh) Thank you! I'm looking forward to the 2nd part. God Bless.

@Rydonattelo

Ай бұрын

I was even a full neo Darwinist atheistic evolutionist until my mid 20s. Then became open to the idea of theistic evolution and now I find the whole of neo Darwinism preposterous. This was before I became Christian. I believe evolution as it is will be laughed at by school children in 100 years. The way we laughed at certain theories the Victorians and such believed. Never before has there been a theory so little understood by the average person yet that same average person will accept it whole sale as fact and get angry defending it. Its frankly an insane theory.

@oldtimerlee8820

Ай бұрын

@@Rydonattelo Amen!

@TickyTack23

Ай бұрын

I feel like I went through like a bell curve of thiest denying, evolution supporting through my studies. As I learned more it seemed so obvious evolution was the truth. But when I started to become an experienced expert in my practice is when I noticed there is a lot of crap science out there. This problem is well documented in acedemia as the replication crisis. Now evolution wasn't on my radar, but the formation of life was a fascinating topic. And well that's where my preconceptions of the world began to unravel, and can't say I believe in the evolution narrative. However I also can't say I'm a creationist either.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

@@TickyTack23 Do you at least understand that the origin of life - abiogenesis - is completely separate from evolutionary theory? Evolution is a natural process which happens when you get imperfect self-replicators competing for limited resources. How the imperfect self-replicators got here doesn't matter. They could have formed naturally or been POOFED by a supernatural Djinn, evolution would still work exactly the same.

@TickyTack23

Ай бұрын

@@sciencerules2825 Yes I do understand.

Never before has there been a theory so poorly understood by the masses that the same masses are prepared to accept and defend it wholesale to the point of anger.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

If you mean evolution the people here defending it are for the most part science professionals who have studied and worked in the subject for years. We just get sick of disingenuous fools like Calvin lying about the science to push his religious agenda.

@greatlondino2407

Ай бұрын

​@sciencerules2825 I am a science professional, evolution is a nice theory, but it definitely is not a fact lol.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

@@greatlondino2407 Yes the occurrence of evolution is a fact. The theory explains the fact. If you were a real science professional you would understand that.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

Which church lied to you?

@greatlondino2407

Ай бұрын

@@tobias4411 No church lied to me or told me evolution is not true. Keep making assumptions, that is all evolution is anyway.

Quite a surprise how many lies are in science textbooks, I knew until now that the appendix was a vestigial organ and that the embryo argument was true. But seeing the truth now come to the surface reminds me of a verse in the bible: 'But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;' 1Cor 1:27. Fabled and crafted theories stand no chance against God's word, however simple it may seem. I believe that one day the truth will stand unopposed and the schemes of crafty men will be brought to light; I look forward to it.

@annieoaktree6774

Ай бұрын

There are more lies about science in this video than in all science textbooks combined.

@truthisbeautiful7492

Ай бұрын

You provided no evidence. What is your background? Were you raised by an anti Christian parent? Were you disciplined out of a Christian church? Did you grow up in a cult? ​@@annieoaktree6774

@annieoaktree6774

Ай бұрын

@@truthisbeautiful7492 Pretty much everything Calvin posts is a lie about the actual science. Like the 30 years old creationist crap on horse evolution he presented. On the tired old likes about the 100 year old story of Haeckel's embryos. Creationists have a laundry list of standard lies about evolution they repeat over and over and over, not caring how many times they've been debunked.

@franksikazwe463

Ай бұрын

​@annieoaktree6774 like which one?

@shadowandreality

Ай бұрын

​@@annieoaktree6774 If you think anyone will believe you, you are quiet naive

The anger comes from the mockers because they know that they are wrong.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

It comes from the scientifically literate who hate to see Calvin pushing these long debunked creationist lies about actual science. Isn't bearing false witness a sin in your religion?

@lampkin9287

Ай бұрын

They don’t understand their position and when you bring an opposing view they can refute you…so the resort to ad hominem

@crabb9966

Ай бұрын

They don't, they just never examined the evidence with an open mind.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

@@lampkin9287 lampkin, please check your comment again.

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

Anger comes in the form of frustration because educating you people on evolution is like pulling teeth.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge but fools despise wisdom and instruction

@WakenAngels

Ай бұрын

Before people jump in your comments and complain about the word "fear", in the original language it means "reverence". Much like you respect the ocean's power or respect a massive animal, you must respect the sovereign God of the universe, and you can never approach Him with a haughty proud heart. If He revealed His full glory, anything that was unholy would cease to exist, and anything that remained would no longer have a choice but to acknowledge Him. So He obscures HImself out of mercy and love, and gives people the choice to approach Him through humility and trust in Christ.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

​@@WakenAngelsCan you provide one evidence outside the bible, supporting claims about Jesus?

@WakenAngels

Ай бұрын

​@@tobias4411 Absolutely. "extrabiblical sources for the validity of Christ". You will find several sources dated within 100-150 years of Jesus's life that corroborate the Gospel accounts, many of whom are from people who were completely opposed to it and had nothing to gain from acknowledging it. You can also research some of the rebuttals to this evidence which rely on speculation and assumptions to sow doubt on the authenticity of the authorship. Considering the sheer amount of independent sources across different regions and timelines, that position is utterly ridiculous and would not hold up in a modern court of law. The forensic evidence is overwhelming.

@WakenAngels

Ай бұрын

​@@tobias4411 Not sure if this comment will post. For the New Testament we have 5700 manuscripts in greek, 10,000 manuscripts in latin vulgate, 5000 manuscripts in ethopic, coptic, armenian, slavonic, georgian, and gothic. 20000 handwritten manuscripts were made before the printing press from 2nd century to 10th century. There are greek maunscripts of the entire new testament over 400 pages long. In total there are 2.5 million pages of the new testament and 1 million comments on the new testament from early church fathers: ignatius, Clement, Polycarp, bishop of Rome, bishop of antioch, papias, and many others. 6000+ manuscript copies about Jesus alone are dated within 100 yrs of His life. That means they're written by people who knew Him or knew those who knew Him. To compare there's less than 10 manuscript copies for Caesar dated 900 years later. ~10 extra biblical sources from historians and governors like Josephus, Thallus, Mara Bar-Serapion, and Nero dated ~100 years of His life confirm Jesus was born a J[...], died on a cross, and His followers and 500 others believed He rose from the dead and then lived transformed lives: e.g. Saul, a pharisee who put Christians in jail before Jesus appeared to Him, then as Paul wrote half the New Testament The Bible was written by 40 people over 1500 years in 3 languages across 3 continents. - they all say the same thing about the same God and Jesus Christ as the Son of God and savior of mankind; yet they say it different: History, allegory, poetry, or prophecy. Across both testaments there are 63779 cross references. Of the 1817 prophecies, half have been fulfilled, including 330 about Jesus. Science estimates it's a 10^17 chance for one man to fulfill 8 of them. Jesus fulfilled all 300. That number is so astronomically big it’s statistically impossible…unless Jesus is Lord Jesus said the Old Testament was true and He is God, claiming the name YWHW for Himself (John 8:48-59). Why would a nation who already believed they were chosen people invent a new religion - gaining neither money or status, and facing excommunication and painful demises - about some carpenter who claimed to be God? Either Jesus was mad, and there are more documents written about a mad man than anyone in human history…or Jesus is God and He was seen risen again, and He promised to raise all who follow Him up too. What makes more sense?

@WakenAngels

Ай бұрын

@@tobias4411 Absolutely. "extrabiblical sources for the validity of Christ". You will find several sources dated within 100-150 years of Jesus's life that corroborate the Gospel accounts, many of whom are from people who were completely opposed to it and had nothing to gain from acknowledging it. You can also research some of the responses to this evidence which rely on speculation and assumptions to sow doubt on the authenticity of the authorship. Considering the sheer amount of independent sources across different regions and timelines, that position is utterly ridiculous and would not hold up in a modern court of law. The forensic evidence is overwhelming.

niles eldredge admits the horse series is wrong & still keeps it up on display in his museum

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

You realize that quote is almost 30 years old, right? And that the current horse evolution phylogenetic tree has been updated while the old one is long gone, right?

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

It has been updated with the new evidence. That's how science works.

@Censoredbyyourcult

Ай бұрын

​@@sciencerules2825 Science changes with new information and evidence, but creationists don't. They're always decades or even centuries behind in some cases. It's nuts!

@saintmalaclypse3217

Ай бұрын

Fun Fact: Niles doesn't actually own, or even run, the American Museum of Natural History. Crazy, right?! It's almost like they treat him as just an employee, not someone who runs the show.

@denvan3143

Ай бұрын

@@Censoredbyyourcult Galileo Galilei, Johann Kepler, Isaac newton, John Maxwell, and Michael Faraday

A week ago I watched an episode regarding evolution on the Darkhorse podcast with Bret and Heather Wienstein. They briefly discussed the amino acid synthesis problem made famous by Stephen Meyer and I'm sure others. It's a discussion regarding the statistical absurdity of amino acids randomly joining together to from usable chains. If you believe the Stats it destroys the time scale argument. They waved it off, "I'm sure there will be a heuristic solution". Completely dismissive of any issues with Darwinism. I posted a comment which references one 2018 paper and four classical problems with Darwinism. My post was hidden within a few minutes, I received one like before they hid it. -That's putting our Science where your mouth is, huh. I found that they had made two posts regarding that video on X, so I commented that they hid my post and presented a screen shot of the post, my comments are not public... -My point is they have nothing, they can only deny. Here is a copy of that post. Where I reference DNA repairability, the sacred to the shamanistic, that is Bret explaining his 'framework' of understanding during his last Jordon Peterson podcast. There's a 2018 paper: Why should mitochondria define species? Stoeckle, Thaler. Using 5 million Mitochondrial DNA samples, spanning 100,000 species, these secular Scientist had some uncomfortable findings. Genetically, 'the world is not a blurry place.' It is hard to find 'intermediates' -- the evolutionary stepping stones between species. The intermediates disappear. The research is a new way to show that species are 'islands in sequence space.' Each species has its own narrow, very specific consensus sequence, just as our phone system has short, unique numeric codes to tell cities and countries apart. Credit: The Rockefeller University The four classical arguments Darwinism does not addressed: 1. Life comes from non-life. -Has not been observable. Has been tried in a lab setting. Interesting to note that the new edition of the McGraw Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms has published abiogenesis as an obsolete concept. Similarly, the Oxford Dictionary of Science labels it as discredited. 2. Complex plant and animal life, including humans, came from a single cell life forms. -No intermediary has been observed between single cell and complex life. (also violates the second law of thermal dynamics) 3. Time and chance drive evolution. -This is what they are talking about regarding probability of proteins forming by accident. Also the 2018, mitochondria DNA study mentioned above suggests 90% of all life today arose 100-200 thousand years ago. 4. Evidence for major evolutionary processes are minor genetic variation within species -The belief that genetic variation within species is proof of macro evolution. DNA repairability, the sacred to the shamanistic, meaningful mutation versus cancer versus allowability. Also, the role of epigenetics hinders the idea.

@maylingng4107

Ай бұрын

You listened to Stephen Meyer? Meyer is a member of the anti-science cult, the Discovery Institute. and has no science education.

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

Did Stephen Myer also run the applicable probabilities to come to this conclusion? No? Because he creates conditions and scenarios and then declares them impossible. Myer is a moron

@sushi0085

Ай бұрын

The problem with concluding statistical probability to assert improbability is false. The probability to win a billion dollar jackpot is low, but as you seen in the news, people win it. The probability to roll a 6 on a die is 1/6. But what if you roll it on the 6 first try? Even if it’s a trillion sided die, if the die is weighted to one side, or if external factors constrict its movement, the probability narrows on a higher probabilistic outcome. Naturalistic mechanisms may indeed make life inevitable. It’s too soon to jump to conclusions on abiogenesis and chalk it all up to magic just because we don’t have all the answers.

@denzilpenbirthy5028

Ай бұрын

perkyzombie Good post ! It might interest you to know that abiogenesis has now been observed , photographed , filmed and proven scientifically, furthermore the experiment is repeatable. There is no longer any doubt, complex life has come from non life.

@globalcoupledances

Ай бұрын

That is not the way proteins are made. You only need rRNA, tRNA and mRNA

Love the journey through history approach. Feels more grounded as something that can be shared with those that are skeptical

@Moist._Robot

Ай бұрын

Any sceptic will see through this ridiculous nonsense.

@donjdanielsjr

Ай бұрын

@@Moist._Robotonly if they do not investigate the claims for themselves. To many people are willfully ignorant on many subjects

@Moist._Robot

Ай бұрын

@@donjdanielsjr No it’s when you do investigate ALL the information it shows creationists are lying every single time.

@donjdanielsjr

Ай бұрын

@@Moist._Robot the sad truth is people are satisfied with high level evolutionary explanations because they have the “weight of science” behind them. When you take it a level or two deeper you find speculation, theories, story telling, and promises that science will eventually discover how things work one day.

@TickyTack23

Ай бұрын

@@donjdanielsjr This is exactly what brought my skepticism, at a high level evolution does make sense. But when you really get into the details, there is a lot of conflation of things we observe in the present time (a couple thousand years of records, and organic materials) and applying the reasoning to many millions of years. And a lot of speculation to how things worked millions of years ago. Like here is an interesting thought. So radio isotope dating is based on the nuclear decay of elements such as potassium, and uranium. Yet the decay starts when the particular mineral was solidified from lava, not when the mineral was placed in the fossil layer. Yet we know the only way things become fossilized is by sedimentation, so the minerals must have been placed there. So on this, when we date the minerals in the sediments, do we get the date of when the fossil was fossilized?

Waiting for part 2. Because, this video is: Ok, let's not touch genetics and molecular analysis, but just limit "debunking" to specific cases by mixing truth with falsification. Great demonstration of confirmation and belief biases and anthropocentrism

@mynameisgladiator1933

Ай бұрын

I like how stupid people like you who think they're smarter than everyone else are laughably stupid. Thx for the laughs!

@calvinsmith7575

27 күн бұрын

Part 2 is up : )

On the one hand, I'm happy to see people being skeptical (theists questioning science); on the other hand I'm sad to see how ham-handed and irrelevant it is, and how they refuse to show similar skepticism toward their ancient myths and delusional/wishful belief system. Reminds me of flat-earthers.

@conrad03

Ай бұрын

glad you can even begin to look at it optimistically, i just feel despair when i see so many people running up the “atheists are scared of and angry at god” thread of “logic”

@ManDuderGuy

Ай бұрын

@@conrad03 Most were inculcated from childhood, and to abandon their superstitions wouldn't just be a change of mind, but a "betrayal/loss" of their family and local community/tradition. It's a helluva drug. But I still appreciate the spirit of skepticism. We should all be willing to question the "received wisdom" of our era or our community or our own personal conscience.

@KamramBehzad

Ай бұрын

Hello friends. I made the following comment on this video. But since these get lost I thought it best to share it with you here. It's my own story of coming to believe in evolution. 1996. I was a new PhD student. Shared my new room in the uni with an Australian guy who was later a very good friend. One day we start talking about evolution. He tells me he believes in it. I tell him I cannot accept so many complex changes can come about by the methods attributed to evolution. He said you are good with computers, there is this guy who simulated simple organisms using computer software and he got strange unexpected results regarding how these simple organisms evolved in his computer program. I read the book, which then inspired me to program the same simulations for the following two years. Later I found that without knowing I had re-invented what today is referred to as "Genetic Programming" in the field of software engineering. I would create software environments and within them emulate organism that passed on their genes and sometimes those genes would randomly have mistakes in their copying process and thus we would end up with a mutated child. Most mutations would result in a new organism that could not survive a normal life. But some mutations actually helped. I played around with the environments I had created. I would simulate tens of thousands of generations of these organism in an ever changing environment. My simulations would run over night as I slept. Some of them I let run for a couple days. I would record everything and then compare generation 1 with generation 1,000 and generation 20,000. The result: I, the denier of evolution, could see how in a minimal computer simulated world evolution happens and creates wonders that I could never foresee - AND I was the programmer! And I could not even foresee the creations of my own program and my own algorithms. Science is truly amazing and enlightening. Thank you my friend Robert Winter. Thank you for sharing a simple thing you had read with me and opened a new world in front of my eyes.

@aikonakamoto9030

Ай бұрын

You have clearly never seen Chrisitians debating rhe Bible then. We have examined our ancient texts. The Bible is the most studied, examined, and scrutinized book of all time. We go through great lengths to verify every punctuation mark.

@ManDuderGuy

Ай бұрын

@@aikonakamoto9030 But you never seem to truly consider if it's just ancient myths like all the others that you ignore (Trobriand Islanders, Egyptians, Yoruba, Chinese etc etc). I don't mean to blindly disparage it all by the way, because myths and parables and whatnot can be very powerful and useful for us humans, it's just that we err when we want to take them as literal/epistemic.

As a pharmacist I laughed at the thyroid and parathyroid organs being “leftover from ancestors, without purpose” LMAO he was right when he said doctors would find that list laughable 😂. God loves you

@KaeFwam

Ай бұрын

Weird. No one considers the thyroid or parathyroid vestigial. Just a flat out lie about evolution.

@SLURPZZZ4461

15 күн бұрын

I've never heard anyone call those useless

@FirstnameLastname-cx6go

5 күн бұрын

Yeah, it’s quite amusing to think about it now, isn’t it? The thyroid and parathyroid glands are crucial for regulating metabolism and calcium levels. Calling them 'leftovers without purpose' is a good example of how early misunderstandings can be corrected with more research and better knowledge. But this actually underscores a key point about science: it evolves. We refine our understanding as new information comes in. What might have seemed like a reasonable hypothesis at one time can be shown to be incorrect, and that’s okay. It’s part of the scientific method. Laughable as those early misconceptions might be, they paved the way for deeper understanding. Doctors and scientists have a good laugh at outdated ideas because they know that the pursuit of knowledge is a journey filled with trial, error, and progress. And it’s that very process-correcting mistakes, building on new findings-that makes science such a powerful tool for uncovering the truths about our world.

Jesus please give me strength. I seem to bear the weight of the world on my shoulders as a single mom, I often face challenges that can seem insurmountable especially with raising two children with special needs. I’m trying to balance everything but Lord I’m struggling to make ends meet, to pay bills, and to put food on the table for my children. Jesus hear my prayers and please continue to give me strength. 💕

@MatthewJ.Francis

Ай бұрын

God bless strong mothers like you!

@criticalthinker8007

Ай бұрын

Best wishes to you, Draw from you own strength and hopefully kindness around you. Many shoulders will lighten the load.

@saintmalaclypse3217

Ай бұрын

Good news, @ChildOfGod! The Bible states that whatever you ask for God will give you. So, just pray "God, please give me a million dollars right now", and he MUST give it to you! Or else the Bible is wrong. And don't let those preachers feed you garbage about "the lord works in mysterious ways" or "god's greatest gift is unanswered prayers". That's some crap THEY made up. The Bible says God WILL answer your prayers, so go get your money, girl!! I'll be praying for you.

@RealHooksy

Ай бұрын

Your church should be helping you out. They put their hands out every week, so ask them to pass some on. If they can’t help you, find one that will.

@razark9

Ай бұрын

Good of you to stay strong. I hope for the best for you, but you should consider finding a better online ministry than Answers in genesis. All they do is lie to you, mislead and misinform you.

It is wild how they don’t even hear themselves. They just want any excuse to avoid spiritual accountability

@obiwankenobi2520

Ай бұрын

I disagree, I think many deny scientific ideas due to their preconceived biases. Many Christian’s start with the idea that young earth creation is true because their church taught them it, so they deny evolution because it doesn’t agree with their religion. It’s like denying modern medicine because a religion teaches illness are actually demons, rather than viruses or bacteria. It’s arrogant

@LordMathious

Ай бұрын

The irony stings.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

What does science have to do with spiritual accountability?

@monster762

Ай бұрын

Yeah, like how people become Christian because they are too lazy to pray 5 times a day.

@pyre8478

Ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 Science should be the method used to observe reality. Accountability is a response to acknowledging said reality. Current practices in modern science are intentionally deceptive, rather than seeking reality, so it has become less a measure of objective truth, and more a new religion itself, with almost cult like methods of manipulation.

Make sure you all tell us when you call The Line and talk to Forrest Valkai about this.

@stevenpolkinghorn4747

9 күн бұрын

What?

@waffles2waffles

9 күн бұрын

@@stevenpolkinghorn4747 if this is great evidence, maybe call The Line (or Atheist Experience or Talk Heathen) and let us know how it goes.

Please keep coming out with these videos because they are very powerful. Outside of these flimsy examples of evolution, evolutions don't have much else. This is very compelling content.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

This is NOT the evidence for evolution. By suggesting that is all there is, Calvin is simply lying

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thanks! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@ARRAM57

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 If you need to close your eyes to evidence and deny science to believe in a made up concept that has no measurable effect on reality. You are sinning in your worldview. What kind of god welcomes lies and deceit?

@trevorrobinson8652

Ай бұрын

And a sky father who don't give a shit about anything is real 😅😂

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

@@ARRAM57 What kind of God uses billions of years of death and suffering to create and calls it very good? : ). Please, stop trying to gaslight...

By the same logic: "In a murder scene, we've discovered a knife with the killer's fingerprints, his skin cells under the victim's fingernails, a strand of his hair, his shoeprints and fibers from his jacket. Later it turned out that the hair was a cat's hair. Therefore there is no way to know who the killer is"

@abcdef-kq2zg

Ай бұрын

It's obvious, the cat did it.

@robertseavor4304

Ай бұрын

*Straw man* argument, there, son. That is not an accurate analogy. Far from it.

@burnttoast2790

Ай бұрын

@@robertseavor4304 This is actually a perfect analogy to describe creationists interacting with the scientific data.

@arpitloveen6997

Ай бұрын

That's nowhere tantamount to what was said in the video

@robertseavor4304

Ай бұрын

@@burnttoast2790 Is it bollocks! Maybe you are dumb enough to think that or maybe you're dumb enough to want to believe that. Either way, you're dumb.

Let's only talk about the 1800s. Oh also piltdown man. Which is still over 100 years ago. Don't look at any of the evidence that we have currently. The earth is flat too. 🙄

@jimrkptex

Ай бұрын

Piltdown Man was exposed as a fraud 41 years after its “ discovery “ .

@TheGoatOfMMA

Ай бұрын

Yeah it's flat for you lol

@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober

23 күн бұрын

@@TheGoatOfMMA I guess someone doesn't get sarcasm.

@nobushidono9897

13 күн бұрын

@@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober These people believe in a invisible sky daddy. You think they'd understand sarcasm through text they can't read properly? These people can't even use adequate grammar.

@FirstnameLastname-cx6go

5 күн бұрын

Alright, let’s talk about the 1800s and Piltdown Man. Why stop there? Let's ignore all the progress we've made in science and stick to outdated nonsense. The Piltdown Man hoax was exposed by scientists using better methods, proving the self-correcting nature of science. But sure, let's cherry-pick debunked information and pretend we haven't advanced since then. And the Earth is flat? That’s not just wrong, it’s hilariously wrong. It’s like claiming the moon is made of cheese. Look, science evolves and corrects itself over time. We've moved past flat Earth theories centuries ago through observation and overwhelming evidence. Sticking to these outdated ideas while ignoring current evidence is not just disingenuous, it's willfully ignorant.

Wow. A lot of these i remember reading as a kid and took it at face value. Kids don't know how to fact check. I believed a lot of these most of my life. It's disappointing how disingenuous some these "scientists" can be for the sake of fame and glory.

@oldtimerlee8820

Ай бұрын

I was taught them, too. Talked about the Nebraska Man, as if I were an expert on his placement on the tree of human "evolution". He's the PROOF. That is until that single tooth was identified as coming from a hog jawbone. (Probably tossed after the jowls were harvested for supper.)

@obiwankenobi2520

Ай бұрын

While I do agree, I think you’ve got it the other way around.

@mikeevangel

Ай бұрын

@@obiwankenobi2520 can you elaborate? I'm open to ideas.

@mikeevangel

Ай бұрын

@oldtimerlee8820 kinda makes you wonder what else they lie to us about doesn't it? Our world isn't as black and white as we thought growing up. That's why I believe it's good to keep an open mind and respect other ideas. Growing up, a lot of scientific "facts" have been changed in a short amount of time. I also learned very recently that the appendix isn't a useless organ that we "evolved" out of. It actually has a purpose. I was always taught in school it was useless and served no purpose.

@mikeevangel

Ай бұрын

@oldtimerlee8820 kinda makes you wonder what else they lie to us about, doesn't it?! Our world isn't as black and white as we thought growing up. That's why I believe it's good to keep an open mind and respect other ideas. Growing up, a lot of scientific "facts" have been changed in a short amount of time. I also learned very recently that the appendix isn't a useless organ that we "evolved" out of. It actually has a purpose. I was always taught in school that it was useless and served no purpose.

What happens to the text in the book on 4:17?

I was absolutely sure Darwinian evolution was correct. Then I ended up studying the biology of the cell - and concluded it was a Just So story. A fable. Now that doesn’t prove the Biblical account is true but the Darwinian challenge is as viable as Freudian psychology.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

Darwin discovered the natural selection of spiecies, but wasn’t aware of things like gene flow and genetic drift. Theory of evolution has been revised several times over the past century and a half to suit our newest and most current understanding. That's how science works

@joeschmoe1794

Ай бұрын

@@tobias4411And it’s still just a really bad story.

@sananton2821

Ай бұрын

@@joeschmoe1794 The genetic evidence is incontrovertible. How do you think we do paterity tests?

@joeschmoe1794

Ай бұрын

@@sananton2821 What does “evolution” have to do with paternity tests?

@philhart4849

Ай бұрын

@@joeschmoe1794 "What does “evolution” have to do with paternity tests?" Easy: DNA sequencing.

Okay, people, buddy, this is really just you using just saying, 'Look, bad scientists were wrong, and that means evolution is false." While there is some truth in his 'facts', he is so heavily cherry-picking that this is not an argument against evolution. This proves that science has changed, grown, and evolved. If using old data that most modern scientists agree was wrong and moved on from is the best argument, you are really grabbing for straws. Then again, it sounds like faith is as flimsy as your 'evidence.'

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

It is intentionally misleading.

@josephmungai1799

Ай бұрын

The problem is people do not believe in evolution. If you don't believe and have faith in science, then the scientific evidence will be beyond you. So in evolution, as in every other religion, faith comes first.

@damienthompson5808

7 күн бұрын

More like evolution is a fraud because the scientists know it and keep fabricating evidence.

To chime in on the unreliability of the embryo sketches, now that various plastination exhibits are relatively common in museums across the world, depending on the one you see, you may see definitive proof of the reality of human embryos. I went to go see such an exhibit in Boston which contained, in a closed-off room with a warning on the door, many plastinated remains of human embryos, fetuses, whatever you want to call them, from 40 weeks gestation all the way down to 5 weeks, which of course is before most women even know they're pregnant. The 5 week embryo, which must have been in a woman who donated her body to this procedure without knowing she was pregnant, looked exactly like a very tiny human being. And all of these successive exhibits, often varying only by one week in time, just looked like slightly larger versions of exactly the same thing, until it was a 7 lb baby.

2006 Kitzmiller vs. Dover. Behe was made a fool of when he denied evolution.

@robertmcmillan3638

24 күн бұрын

Judges are notoriously corrupt though. Look at Capcom Vs Data East over their Street Fighter 2 clone and how Trump is getting an anti Trump judge overseeing his prosecutions in an election year.

Why should i believe in your god rather than someone else's?

@rainsunshine5258

Ай бұрын

If you are wanting answers as to why the Judo/Christian God I have found "Daily Dose of Wisdom", "Ask Cliff" and "Whaddo Meme" has answered so many of my questions

@eneeland

Ай бұрын

Why believe in gov't created actual currency rather than the thousands of counterfeits?

I am still curious about the presence of similar cell structures: mitochondria, chloroplasts, dna, etc in eukaryotic cells. I always thought this was the strongest support for evolution but you didn’t bring it up.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

Of course ot. He does't want to talk about the GOOD evidence for evolution. Somebody might start thinking for themselves, and religion never wants that.

@ohkihirano5974

27 күн бұрын

So similarity isn't an evidence for evolution, because the assumption that when two things look alike they must share the same origin isn't correct to begin with. Rather, God the master architect reuses the basic pattern he created across different things.

@willschlientz2200

20 күн бұрын

@ohkihirano5974 Firstly, these similarities are evidence in support of evolution, even if they aren’t proof. If evolution is correct we would expect to see these similarities, and if we didn’t we could conclude that there likely isn’t a universal common ancestor. Additionally, I won’t say your idea is wrong, because I can’t prove that, but it seems to be a god of the gaps conclusion, that you can’t explain these similarities so you conclude that it was god.

I love how he selectively took some handful of examples that were discarded by the researchers themselves, and ignored wide range of examples from genetics, physiology, development and behaviour.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

It is intentional.

@bigcorky4687

Ай бұрын

He does the same thing in every video

@marsoccpl4580

Ай бұрын

I guess the question is, what is the problem that’s trying to be solved here? Is it that evolution doesn’t exist and never has, or is it that evolution somehow proves that God isn’t real (which would be impossible to do using the scientific method)? Or is it that God lives and some form of evolution happens (not to the extent Darwin suggests) as part of His plan? Is it possible to be a scientist and believe in God? 🤔

@bigcorky4687

Ай бұрын

@@marsoccpl4580 it certainly is possible , anyone can be delusional I suppose

@pmaitrasm

Ай бұрын

He is indulging in confirmation bias.

I love these videos man

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thanks! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@razark9

Ай бұрын

You love anti-science religious propaganda delivered by religious preachers wanting to inject religion into science?

@Creationism-is-pseudoscience

Ай бұрын

You love being lied to by a smug fraud?

@halodude4481

Ай бұрын

@@Creationism-is-pseudoscience whatever you say bro the evidence is right in front of you!

@Creationism-is-pseudoscience

Ай бұрын

@@halodude4481 Evidence of what? How all of science you dislike is wrong, or for your religious beliefs? Why don't you show scientists this supposed evidence?

The part about archeopteryx in the video is so misleading.

@Censoredbyyourcult

Ай бұрын

Everything from Answers in Genesis is misleading.

@mikev4621

Ай бұрын

straw-manning

@kerzman

Ай бұрын

@@mikev4621 GOOD CALL! It's a textbook example.

@nathancook2852

Ай бұрын

@@mikev4621 Nope, I have pointed many problems, and this is the response I usually get. It is an easy way out for you all...

@saintmalaclypse3217

Ай бұрын

@@Censoredbyyourcult The phrase "Answers in Genesis" is misleading! Unless the question is "What myths did the Bronze Age shepherds in the middles east write about?", there are no answers in Genesis.

Thank you AIG 🙏✝️🙏 very cool 😎

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

AiG Canada! : ). And thanks a lot! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@nathancook2852

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Please give to the correct AIG! Calvin get's pissy if you don't give HIM your $$$. Just like he get's pissy when you call out his lies.

You kinda proved evolution with your very first page tear. Neanderthals were not ancestors of Homo sapiens, they were derived from a common ancestor to early humans. Random mutations in this common ancestor species led to many different splits including Neanderthals and humans. The best possible theory (evolution) says that Homo sapiens simply ended up with traits that allowed them to survive whereas Neanderthals couldn’t compete with us for resources and shelter (even though they were very similar, they were different in the way they only lived in small groups and they didn’t adapt to changes in environment as well as Homo Sapiens did), and they also interbred with Homo sapiens in a way that very little of their genetics was passed down, because, once again, any new offspring that had more Neanderthal characteristics than human had lower chances of surviving, and offsprings with mostly human characteristics had higher survival rates (natural selection).

Can you do some kind of a discussing panel about this topic. I would love to see highly educated scientists argue against you and then you can use these same debunking methods. I think your proves against evolution in this video were quite shallow and you just picked examples and cherrypicked quotes. So I’m waiting for a discussion with scientists on this topic. This video surely is very convincing… if the viewer knows nothing about biology.

Thank you for demonstrating that humans are sometimes wrong, sometimes liars, but that science is able to overcome that and continue learning more and more. The scientific method is still as solid and reliable as it ever was, and is able to adapt to new knowledge. The Bible isn't able to "correct" itself when it's shown to be wrong, so it's a much less reliable path to truth. I appreciate you demonstrating that!

@darkpluto8508

Ай бұрын

Where is the Bible wrong?

@johnsmit5999

Ай бұрын

I didn't even hear him mention the Bible.

@saintmalaclypse3217

Ай бұрын

​@@darkpluto8508 Well, I'll leave out all the magic claims, since believers will just say that God can do it! In Genesis, it says god created two lights, or "lamps" in Hebrew, the Sun and the Moon. We now know the moon isn't a light, it's just a reflector. We know that Herod never had a mass baby-slaughter under his watch. We also know that no census took place during the time when Jesus was born. But if you think maybe we just haven't found the records, then we also know that NO country has ever had the practice of making citizens go to their birth city for a census. The census is for tax purposes, and they want to know where you LIVE so they can tax you, not where you were born. Making an entire empire full of people travel all at once to their hometowns would cripple the economy. The entire lie about Mary and Joseph traveling to Bethlehem was most likely an attempt to try to force the story to fit a prophecy. The Bible says Pi=3. Even other cultures at the time knew better than that, and certainly God should have known. But he didn't. The bible says slugs melt when they walk. They don't melt, and the don't walk. The Bible says there is a dome in the sky that holds back the waters up there. It's understandable if a bronze age shepherd thought the blue sky + rain meant there was water up there, but God would have known better. The Bible says the earth stands on pillars. It also refers to the "four corners" of earth. The Bible implies that the first rainbow occurred after the Flood and is a promise from God. Now we know how rainbows occur, and they would not have been a new thing during biblical times. Ezekiel says that Babylon will destroy Tyre. Didn't happen. So then Ezekiel doubles down and says since they toiled and failed against Tyre, God will give Egypt to the Babylonians. This, too, did not happen. And so on, and so on...Just try reading the book, or researching errors in it. Not only is it full of errors, but the examples from Ezekiel could have just been left out, but they are KEPT in there almost as proof that sometimes God gets it wrong. 🤷‍♂

@saintmalaclypse3217

Ай бұрын

@@darkpluto8508 In Ezekiel, God says that Babylon will conquer Tyre. It didn't happen, and the Bible even confirms it didn't happen. It says because they couldn't destroy Tyre, God will give Egypt to the Babylonians. That, too, doesn't happen. So the bible itself confirms it got things wrong. There are literally thousands of other errors, but apologists will make excuses, and believers will say "the lord works in mysterious ways", but this example, at least, makes a prediction, acknowledges that it was wrong, then makes another false prediction. Deuteronomy says the punishment for false prophets is death...so, it apparently got THAT wrong, too!

@MFaith777

Ай бұрын

@@saintmalaclypse3217 Ezekiel 26:1-28:19 is a prophecy against the ancient Phoenician city-state and commercial center of Tyre. Because of Tyre’s pride and exploitation of God’s people, Israel, their judgment was ensured. Writing between 593 and 565 BC, the prophet Ezekiel warns of the devastation that would come upon Tyre. In Ezekiel 26:3-6, the Lord says to the wicked city, “I am against you, Tyre, and I will bring many nations against you, like the sea casting up its waves. They will destroy the walls of Tyre and pull down her towers; I will scrape away her rubble and make her a bare rock. Out in the sea she will become a place to spread fishnets. . . . She will become plunder for the nations, and her settlements on the mainland will be ravaged by the sword.” In verse 14, the Lord makes this startling promise: “I will make you a bare rock, and you will become a place to spread fishnets. You will never be rebuilt.” These prophecies came true in amazing detail. In analyzing the passage and its fulfillment, a little geography is helpful. The name Tyre was associated with two locations of the city: one location was on the mainland, and we could call it “continental Tyre,” “coastal Tyre,” or “Old Tyre.” The other location was on a nearby small island, and we could call it “insular Tyre” or “New Tyre.” Insular Tyre had two harbors and was a major center of commerce in the Mediterranean. The island on which New Tyre was built was separated from the mainland by a shallow strait only about 540 yards wide. God said that “many nations” would come against Tyre, and that’s what history records: • King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon besieged coastal Tyre (585-573 BC), and the city on the mainland fell. Babylon was unable to conquer insular Tyre, however, and so only partially fulfilled Ezekiel’s prophecy. • Greece, under Alexander the Great, besieged insular Tyre (332 BC), destroyed the city, and killed about 8,000 men. In besieging the island, Alexander used rubble from the demolished buildings of coastal Tyre to build a causeway across the channel to insular Tyre. In this way, the prophecy of Ezekiel 26:12 came true in literal fashion: “They will break down your walls and demolish your fine houses and throw your stones, timber and rubble into the sea.” Tyre was razed to the ground, and from then on the island on which Tyre was built was no longer an island but a peninsula. After Alexander’s conquest, Tyre never regained its glory and went through long periods of being totally uninhabited. At various times, other settlements have been established near the site of Tyre, but those, too, have suffered invasion: • The Muslims conquered Tyre in AD 638. • Crusaders from Europe conquered the area in AD 1124. • The Mameluke Muslims retook the area in AD 1291 and reduced Tyre to ashes. The place remained uninhabited for the next 300 years. In 1894 the population of Tyre was reported to be about 200 people living in an obscure fishing village. In more recent times, the country of Lebanon has been rebuilding Tyre and rebranding it as a tourist attraction. The city now has an estimated population of 135,000. Tyre’s southern harbor has been long unusable, but the northern harbor is still used for small fishing operations and recreation. True to Ezekiel’s prophecy, the city of Tyre was at one time completely destroyed, and, due to Alexander the Great’s determination to conquer insular Tyre, the place became “a bare rock, . . . a place to spread fishnets” (Ezekiel 26:14). However, the prophecy of Ezekiel 26:14 also says that Tyre “will never be rebuilt,” and this has caused some critics to claim the Bible contains a false prophecy, since there does exist a village of Tyre today. In answer to this, we’ll focus on the word rebuilt. If Tyre were to be truly “rebuilt,” then everything mentioned in Ezekiel 27 would have to be restored: - national prominence and regional influence (see Ezekiel 27:3) - national strength and security (see Ezekiel 27:10-11) - wealth and prosperity and opulence (see Ezekiel 27:3-4, 33) The prophecy of Ezekiel 26:14 does not mean there would never be anything built on the island. It means that, after its final defeat by wave after wave of conquerors, Tyre would never regain the status it held in Ezekiel’s day. Tyre would never again be a commercial superpower, a world trader, or a colonizer. Tyrians would never again possess the riches and prosperity they had in their city’s heyday. When God told Tyre, “You will never be rebuilt,” He did not lie. Ancient Tyre was stripped of its glory and strength. Modern Tyre is but a shadow of its former reality. The businesses and dwellings that now stand on the ancient site are a far cry from the luxury, greatness, or influence of the original city-state. That Tyre-the Tyre judged by God-will never be reconstituted or rebuilt.

Excelent video.

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thanks! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober

23 күн бұрын

if you like being lied to, sure.

I like this video ! I'd just suggest that you replace the words "all of the best" with "some of the best" considering the fact that there's also a Part 2.

@sebcw1204

Ай бұрын

Do you think part two is going to address the experiment that resulted in a single celled species evolving into a multicellular species? Or do you think it's just going to be more attacks on older science instead of current understanding.

@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober

23 күн бұрын

Rather I'd suggest replacing "all of the best" with "nothing but lies and misrepresentations". That would be a far more accurate description.

For somebody who claims that evolution doesn't/can't happen, Calvin sure puts a hell of a lot of time and effort into trying to debunk and refute it.

@stevenpolkinghorn4747

9 күн бұрын

Well of course. Christians should spend time and effort disproving lies that lead to people believing that Genesis is not true and therefore God lied to them and they shouldn’t accept Christ. Evolution is a lie that leads to hell. It also leads directly to the worst human atrocities of all time; The Holocaust, mass murder of anyone seen as “not the fittest for survival” and the mass murder of children in the womb that still occurs today. If we can debunk this myth once and for all and regain real scientific credibility of our institutions, much good can be done and the cause of Christ can be better accomplished.

@TLK-tx8so

3 күн бұрын

@@stevenpolkinghorn4747 Debunking a few points does not debunk thousands of others. We can observe evolution in real-time, such as bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics. Besides, evolution does not argue for or against the existence of God.

@stevenpolkinghorn4747

3 күн бұрын

@@TLK-tx8so developing resistance is not in any way similar to the process of sources to species change. And claiming that it is evidence of species change over millions of years is intellectually dishonest. Trying to disprove a hair-brain theory like evolution has to be done point by point because they constantly come up with new ideas that don’t make sense. It’s a deluge of ideas that make the theory seem legitimate but it’s not.

@TLK-tx8so

3 күн бұрын

​@@stevenpolkinghorn4747 While bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics (over several generations, mind you) may seem different from long-term species change (millions of years), it's a clear example of evolution. Small changes over time lead to big changes, a core principle of evolution. "Micro" and "macro" evolution are both still evolution, so you still haven't disproven evolution. Could you provide any evolutionary idea that doesn't make sense? I don't claim to know all the answers, so I'm open to a conversation. I await your response.

The only thing all of this proves is that people will believe whatever they want to believe.

@thavith

Ай бұрын

Sadly, that is true to a point, buts its good to listen to both sides of the argument. I have no issue which side of the fence you sit if you have good arguments for why you are there. If your argument is the other side is delusional, then you probably need to go back and work on what you believe. I wanted to believe in evolution and tried my best to find evidence for it. My bias was in favour of it, not trying to prove it wrong. I didn't want to have to deal with God if he didn't exist...

@88Padilla

Ай бұрын

@@thavith Sure, I can get behind that. I just don't understand why people are not comfortable with knowing that they don't know and letting that be, and want to be correct despite still not knowing what they claim to know.

@skataguy5050

Ай бұрын

​@@thavithYou say you wanted to believe in evolution but couldn't. Does this mean that you now have religious faith? If so, how did you jump from simply not believing in evolution to making an extraordinary, unprovable claim about a god's existence. Firstly, there isn't a critique of evolution that hasn't been thoroughly explained/debunked already plenty of times. There's no grand conspiracy to shield the theory from criticism. People are free to publish their critiques to be peer-reviewed. The problem is, none of the critiques of evolution have survived the peer-review process. Secondly, even if evolution were fully debunked to the core, any religious/supernatural/spiritual claim would require a much higher standard of evidence by default. Evolution is talking about things that we have examples of and see in the world. Creationism is introducing the idea of an ethereal being that poofed our world into existence, something we don't have any real-world examples of.

@johnsmit5999

Ай бұрын

@@skataguy5050 Where are the real world examples for the Big Bang which poofed us into existence?

@blueyechoe2287

Ай бұрын

Do you know how scientists make vaccines?

How I love that round file. These videos are getting intense! Thank you so much, can't wait for the next one... love yas! 1 Tim 3:15. (what church)

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thank you! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@sananton2821

Ай бұрын

1 Tim is a forgery.

You didn't debunk anything. You just don't understand it. Just like if I were to preach from the Bible... In the case that I have not read it, I would sound like a fool. Like this video does

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

I didn't have to debunk anything- evolutionists did it for me by admitting all of the so called proofs were false : ). I just reported it out loud... : )

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 someone admitted to you that biostratigraphy isn't a sound science?

@cannawithkendall1872

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575nobody asked tho. Go tell your mom? 🤷‍♂️

@cannawithkendall1872

Ай бұрын

@@AMC2283 his mom

@therick363

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575you keep lying. Why?

If anyone lists out these I'd like a copy but I don't want to watch it again to write them down. Thanks in advance.

@logicalatheist1065

Ай бұрын

This isn't a video to take any sort of science from

@SamFey

Ай бұрын

See if you can highlight and copy the transcript under the transcript heading. Shouldn't be a problem if it's getting used for educational purposes and no money is getting made from it.

Ah… The simplicity… Finding point of contention and denying the entire proof/theory is like reading the Bible, finding one inconsistency (and there are many) and throwing the entire book out. Moving on to the next holy book and doing the same… I urge you to look for a debunking of this debunking and actually hear arguments with actual references. Try Forrest Valkai…

@Zelda64-cj1

5 күн бұрын

there are no inconsistencies in the Bible find one i'll eat my commputer.

A lot of angry God-haters here.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

Nah, we just hate people who shamelessly lie about science to push their religious agendas.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

Is that supposed to be a rational criticism of the theory?

@kaptainkilogram

Ай бұрын

@@AMC2283 No, it's just an unbiased, factual analysis of the majority's attitude toward YHWH.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@kaptainkilogram the last thing you are is unbiased

@poopandfartjokes

Ай бұрын

@@kaptainkilogramare you talking about the one true God?

No evolutionist ever claimed evolution has all the answers. But neither does organized religion.

@denvan3143

Ай бұрын

“No evolutionist ever claimed evolution has all the answers. But neither does organized religion.” It’s interesting you make a distinction between “science” “organized religion”; is this a tacit admission that science is not organized? The various fields of science are currently in a crisis of falsification of data; scandals concerning this have been uncovered at Yale, Harvard and other institutions of higher education. You would not expect it to be otherwise, as evolution is a process of survival, not the distinction of right from wrong or truth from lies. Evolution is a group of people trying to be the fittest to survive by telling the biggest and best lies at the highest volume possible. Western civilization is based on the principle of loving God with all of your heart and loving your neighbor as yourself. God is the source of love and truth, and it is by that standard. We can love others as much as ourselves. And that answers the basic question of life: how do we get along with one another? There’s no such allowance in evolution, the survival of the fittest. There is no truth in that, there is no right or wrong and crime is as effective a solution as any to ensure your survival at the expense of someone else. The believers in evolution tried that in the last century: it was called World War II. And those who believe in evolution caused the death of between 70 and 85 million people in Europe

@richardgregory3684

Ай бұрын

@@denvan3143 Orgabised religion refers to the following: religion in which belief systems and rituals are systematically arranged and formally established, typically by an official doctrine (or dogma), a hierarchical or bureaucratic leadership structure, and a codification of proper and improper behavior. In other words, something like the Catholic Church would be organised religion. This distinguishes it from personal beliefs. _The various fields of science are currently in a crisis of falsification of data; scandals concerning this have been uncovered at Yale, Harvard and other institutions of higher education_ Are they? Citations required. _Western civilization is based on the principle of loving God with all of your heart and loving your neighbor as yourself_ Is it? REALLY? A look at history says otherwise. _And that answers the basic question of life: how do we get along with one another? There’s no such allowance in evolution, the survival of the fittest. There is no truth in that, there is no right or wrong and crime is as effective a solution as any to ensure your survival at the expense of someone else_ Except in humans, who as a social species, generally speaking, getting along with other people IS survival of the fittest.

@westonk3420

Ай бұрын

Fr

@randomusername3873

Ай бұрын

​@@denvan3143Amazing how religious people seem unable to see the survival benefits that getting along might have on a population Goes to show how religion is a deen of sociopaths

@randomusername3873

Ай бұрын

​@@denvan3143you might not want to bring up world war 2, since the nazis had your God on their belts

Great video, guys!

As a bibliophile it's unnerving every page you tore, whether it's junk information or not.

So the alternative is a magical being bteathing life into clay statues...yeah that makes more sense

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

It’s actually burping on clay.

Nobody argued Neanderthals were any less intelligent than humans, in fact, many argue that Neanderthals were actually smarter but due to their increased size, when food became scarce, they died out while we survived. We also had cross species sex with them, people from origins closer to the northern hemisphere around Europe still share DNA today from those encounters. This entire video is silly.

4:02 . i'm a little slow, so can someone explain why the neanderthal man isn't proof of evolution? is it because it isn't far back enough? That they are basically human?

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

this guy refutes nothing. Neanderthal were a member of our genus, they're human in that sense, evolved from the same ancestor we did, and now they're extinct. They weren't homo sapiens a day in their existence.

9:57 yes it is… smth that used to have a function, that has since deteriorated or been repurposed is significant… your dismissal is weird.

Differences in finches beaks have also been called a proof of evolution. I always considered that strange. If someone is intelligent enough to invent a car... would you conclude them incapable of customizing the car's design. If a customer needed to drive in the snow, you would add heated seats, awd, and sturdy tires with good traction. For driving in a warm sunny location you might present a convertible car and a cooling steering wheel. Such features would not show up by chance... they would be designed.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

Darwin's finches where first one species that colonized Galapagos 2-3 million years ago. They have diversified into 18 different species. They are characterized by rapid adaptation to an unstable and challenging environment leading to ecological diversification and speciation. The results? Striking diversity in their phenotypes, like beak types, body size, plumage, feeding behavior and song types. They are still evolving of course. Studying Darwin's finches shows that new species can develop in only two generations. Remember, evolution is about gradually changes in populations over time in living organisms. All life on this plnet is a result of this gradual changes. Natural selection means that when competing for resources and avoiding predators, organisms will survive and reproduce IF they have traits that give them an advantage. Finch population developed different traits that helped them take advantage of food resources. Some finches developed beaks that are great at picking up big seeds and some finches developed long, thin beaks that can eat food from cactuses without getting poked. Original finch population has split up into different species. Your car analogy is invalid, can't compare with living organisms. Evolution is a mindless process, it doesn't progress towards a goal or final destination. It doesn't have intent or foresight. It's a process of trial and error, of experimentation and adaptation. It's like a blind watchmaker. It's blind...to failure. It does not need help from a higher being, a deity. The design in our living world is an illusion. There are no deliberate designs in nature. When an organism’s circumstances change and demand a completely different body, evolution cannot go back to the drawing board. Instead, it works with what it has

@maylingng4107

Ай бұрын

The proof of evolution is confirmed 100% by modern Genetics. Evolution (new species) has been duplicated in the laboratory.

@fishinnewengland4807

Ай бұрын

Proof of adaptation***

@nathancook2852

Ай бұрын

It is proof of natural selection. We can see the changes. They were not there originally - if they were, that would be design. Just like we see the changes in Peppered Moths in England, multiple types of lizards, and other birds, field mice, and all kinds of other creatures that have undergone selection since the 1800's.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

They diversified into 18 different species. They are characterized by rapid adaptation to an unstable and challenging environment leading to ecological diversification and speciation. The results? Striking diversity in their phenotypes, like beak types, body size, plumage, feeding behavior and song types. They are still evolving of course. Studying Darwin's finches shows that new species can develop in only two generations.

Wait, do you think Neanderthals were supposedly the ancestors of homo-sapiens? That’s not the case. Neanderthals and Homo sapiens were cousins on the evolutionary tree, stemming from a different common ancestor.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

He thinks that because people guessed that 150 years ago, everyone must still think it. That's how out of touch these people are.

Would you respond to clint from clints reptiles video?

Awesome, More I don’t understand reality instead of providing actual evidence for my magical belief system!!!

The problem with convincing the average person that evolution is false is not a lack of physical proof but the lack of knowledge in the average person.

@Moist._Robot

Ай бұрын

No it’s that there’s no evidence against it apart from deceitful propaganda by creationists. All 7 of these examples in this video are long ago debunked lies by creationists.

@samblackburn1024

Ай бұрын

Couldn't have said it better myself, also I reckon it has something to do with their hearts getting the way or pride, however you want to look at it

@nrg2078

Ай бұрын

If schools says it's true, movies says it's true and most people says it's true - as a young man, why would you argue?

@samblackburn1024

Ай бұрын

@nrg2078 have you heard of something called indoctrination? Manipulation? Agenda? If the school said that there's no God why don't people kill themselves knowing life is pointless? Please get to the end of your thoughts so you don't have intellectual inconsistencies, cheers

@samblackburn1024

Ай бұрын

@nrg2078 I'm 30 old timer. If im following your logic correctly if I watch finding Nemo all of a sudden fish can speak English?

What a smooth talker. And so mistakenly confident!

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

Grifters are also called "confidence men" for a reason.

@anaquaduck5252

Ай бұрын

The once so confident 'scientific proof' was obviously mistaken and in serious error. Unless you support the supposed evidence that now resides in the bin/garbage.

@christiansoldier77

Ай бұрын

You are describing Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens

@anthonybarcellos2206

Ай бұрын

@@christiansoldier77 Except they had the unfair advantage of the facts.

@christiansoldier77

Ай бұрын

@@anthonybarcellos2206 What facts ?

4:28 hang on… you’re not gonna say why Neanderthal was reclassified? Not mention the dozens and dozens of hominid species found since, over the past many decades?

Great, informative video!

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

If you like being lied to by a charlatan.

@thenameless2016

Ай бұрын

@@sciencerules2825 give me the evidence

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

@@thenameless2016evidence that this guy is a liar?

@booney409

Ай бұрын

@@sciencerules2825 womp womp😢

ok maybe start with debuking all the times we've observed evolution actually happening for reference we have seen this so many times that people even do this in some collage biology classes

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

Whenever you show them the evidence, they just say "that's not evolution." The imagine "evolution" being some kind of illogical Thing that they aren't really clear on, but they know it can't exist because someone said so.

@MisterCapra

Ай бұрын

We've observed a kind of animal turn into a completely different kind?

@PilgrimRanger

Ай бұрын

Collage Biology - is that like college biology only with lots of weak arguments all stuck together to try and prop up evolution? Seriously, where is your proof to back up this statement? And don’t say peppered moths because we all know that natural selection is not proof of goo to you.

@bigsammcbam6123

Ай бұрын

Evolution has never been observed. It's utter guess work and lies to keep careers afloat.

@dinotherugger4040

Ай бұрын

@@MisterCapra Notice how he hasn't replied 😂

Good point. Love the video.

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

I have already posted the refutation, you are late 😅

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thank you! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@muerica1

21 күн бұрын

@@tobias4411😂😂stupid dork, you got clapped

Organisms change over time. That’s an observed fact and evolution in a nutshell.

@nobushidono9897

13 күн бұрын

They don't want to acknowledge corn, the laboratory mouse, or the appendix.

@sarahshannon1454

12 күн бұрын

Adaptation is not proof of evolution.

@nobushidono9897

12 күн бұрын

@@sarahshannon1454 Natural selection is.

I went to a private school run by the Presbyterian church, in the 1960s. And yet, we were still taught evolution.

I was waiting for debunking... I only got misrepresentations and falsehoods.

@josephmungai1799

Ай бұрын

Yeah, right. He lied.

@kanedalton1816

Ай бұрын

Glueing an ape jawbone into a human skull and filing the teeth down to support evolution is not a misrepresentation, nor are the other fraudulent claims that have been debunked (yes debunked) by staunch evolutionists themselves.

@gknight4719

16 күн бұрын

Please explain the pathway of the laryngeal nerve in humans THEN.

@ericdanielhaley

8 күн бұрын

What was misrepresented?

@gknight4719

7 күн бұрын

@@ericdanielhaley Maybe logic and critical thinking.

given all that, why not also address the things that *still* persist and fuel the theory of evolution even though all these other things (in the video) have been disproven... are they there any remaining things?

Thie video really thinks itself as a slam dunk but its just not. Please debunk current scientific thinking and not things from a lifetime ago

Amazing. Every single “point” this guy made was speciously reasoned. He makes less sense than a “flat earthier.”😂

Very enjoyable, thank you!

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

You know that only 1-2% of all scientists out there agrees in this nonsense, right?

I double checked John H.Ostrom publication from 1976, where he clearly says: "All available evidence indicates unequivocally that Archaeopteryx evolved from a small coelurosaurian dinosaur and that modern birds are surviving dinosaurian descendants." (Ostrom, John H. (June 1976). "Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds" (PDF). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 8 (2): 91-182). Also we have other sources saying: "Ostrom showed more bird-like traits common in dinosaurs and proved that birds themselves are in fact a group of coelurosaurian theropods, a descendant of dinosaurs." Also "Ostrom lived to see the eventual discovery of feathered dinosaurs in northeastern China, confirming his theories about dinosaurs being progenitors of birds". Interesting isn't it?

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

Calvin's choice of quotes was intentionally dishonest.

@bigsammcbam6123

Ай бұрын

And it sticks because an evolutionist said so? What about other evolutionists who weren't convinced, evolutionists like Dr Colin Patterson and what they have said about Archaeopteryx?

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

@@bigsammcbam6123 I also already addressed Colin Patterson. He did NOT support creationism, but his work has been cited by creationists with claims that it provides evidence of the absence of transitional forms in the fossil record.[8][9] In the second edition of Evolution (1999), Patterson stated that his remarks had been taken out of context: Because creationists lack scientific research to support such theories as a young earth ... a world-wide flood ... or separate ancestry for humans and apes, their common tactic is to attack evolution by hunting out debate or dissent among evolutionary biologists. ... I learned that one should think carefully about candour in argument (in publications, lectures, or correspondence) in case one was furnishing creationist campaigners with ammunition in the form of 'quotable quotes', often taken out of context.

I sometimes wish there was a second like button 🙂 Thanks for this video, it really enlightens. Would be great if it would have referenced to papers in the description, so people could look it up

@oldtimerlee8820

Ай бұрын

Use the keywords in the video to look them up, yourself. That enables you to see various viewpoints, learn the history of the subject (swine tooth Nebraska Man, for example) and more. Weight the sources of the information. Does it come from someone's basement? If so, is he or she referencing a PhD in the applicable field? Sometimes l'd like multiple like buttons, too! 🙂

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

The references appear at the bottom of the quotes on screen. I also have blog versions at the AiG Canada website which have all of the references listed : )

@RealHooksy

Ай бұрын

Hit it twice🤦🏻‍♂️

@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober

23 күн бұрын

If these liars actually referenced anything other than their own BS, everyone would see how big a bunch of liars they really are. You'll never find these frauds reference any real scientific literature. If you really wanted to, you could look it up yourself. Try using google scholar. But you might be disappointed in what you find. None of it will support this sh!t these liars spew constantly.

Thank you for another well presented video with great content. Love your work. God bless and greetings from South Africa

So, does your debunking prove anything? Such as "creationism| and the Bible's account?

Heckels embryos are still in my daughter's textbook today in Australia

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

Ernst Haeckel was never convicted as fraud, there is no evidence for that. That's why creationists can't provide it when asked to. Haeckel didn't knew as much as we know today about evolution. That's why he got the details wrong and made mistakes in his drawings, BUT most importantly, it was corrected after the first edition of the book. So the fact is that the accusations against him were sloppy at best and fraudulent at worst. A credible accuser would have checked the later editions of the work, not the first edition. By the way, his drawings are 150 years old, today we have 3d photos supporting the evidence for evolution in Embryology.

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

It interesting that one can’t learn a history of embryology and build upon that knowledge. These people expect their children to just dive on in and learn to fly before they learn what a plane is.

@benjones5799

Ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 the problem is they aren't accurate even remotely

@tobias4411

Ай бұрын

​@@benjones5799What's not accurate? Be specific. Otherwise your claim is falling flat.

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

They should be embarrassed but they continue to use fake evidence because it still works... : (

This highly educational video inpired me to find the truth in the Bible, this same way. So, after reading some truly silly stuff, i ripped off first page, secpnd, third, fourth, fifth... It was hard work really. There is no page left.

@logicalatheist1065

Ай бұрын

This isn't an educational video. Answers in Genesis is the worst of the worst when it comes to scientific literacy

@SamFey

Ай бұрын

​@@logicalatheist1065So you keep saying Bring some evidence to support your claims next time.

@logicalatheist1065

Ай бұрын

@@SamFey what claims?

@SamFey

Ай бұрын

@@logicalatheist1065 Have you forgotten what you have posted already?

@logicalatheist1065

Ай бұрын

​@@SamFeyi didn't post any claims...

And one of the challenges of the horse series is how the number of ribs keeps changing. They keep disappearing and reappearing like magic.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

No, they do not. Genetic variation will occasionally cause offspring to have a different number of ribs, and that will spread in the population depending on what is advantageous. Nothing magical; nothing illogical; nothing impossible.

5:36 1868? You do know a lot of science has been done since, right?

Fun to hear and read people who still believe in ghsts, fairy tales and gods...😅

@Mr_Green1017

7 күн бұрын

And people still believe our ancestors were tadpoles at one point 😂

@TLK-tx8so

3 күн бұрын

​@@Mr_Green1017 Shared DNA in all living organisms proves this.

How many sources would you like to provide for this video? This guy: none

@sliglusamelius8578

Ай бұрын

How many sources are provided for the narrative of "evolution" in high school textbooks? None. Haeckel drawings are a joke! They still tell lies about vestigial organs.

@johnsmit5999

Ай бұрын

He named the scientists he was quoting.

@capnjs

Ай бұрын

Each of these are well studied and documented events that can be easily searched out with the information provided in the video. It is also guaranteed that the sources providing such information are not going to be a few paragraphs-academic fraud takes many pages to create, and even more to unravel! If you are hoping for an easy path which requires little reading, I recommend watching a video where someone has conveniently done all the research and presented it succinctly-like this one! And if you want to read the sources yourself, there’s no more detailed method than independent study! My personal favorite tool for independent study is the King James Bible! Maranatha!

@Floodedarea-ed3bm

Ай бұрын

​@@capnjswrong, searching them leads to nowhere. The most you might get is a creationist who quoted it also just claiming it with no source.

@blueyechoe2287

Ай бұрын

@@johnsmit5999 I searched the first citiaion. He made no links whatsoever. I went to the book Natural History 87 of 1978 to page ten. I found no Erik . Maybe he should cite a link.

Please explain how a God created life? And then how you prove it's your specific God.

9:33 why is the concept of vestigial parts a bad proof? evolution is the change of an organism. it doesn't have to be the gain of a function, it can also be the loss of it if it is no longer useful, right?

@Apollos2.2

Ай бұрын

No because lossing things isn't how you gain them to go from amoeba to man evolution.

This video didn't disprove anything. Most of the points you brought up just demonstrated that certain old scientific literature is outdated. That's a COMPLETELY normal thing; that's why we update science to better fit our framework of knowledge. I'd love to hear you talk about modern scientific literature and try to point out any significant flaw in it. Maybe speak to an evolutionary biologist? I know you'd never do that though. Haeckel's drawings weren't "fradulent" in the sense that all of his contemporaries spoke of. He had an idea of what the human embryo looked like based on other contextual evidence, so he emphasized certain features of his illustrations to prove a point, and guess what, he was right! The technology that we use now to observe what Haeckel had to illustrate proved him correct. Human embryo's share dozens of similarites with other animal embryos, especially those that are closer to us in relation. And for the love of your self-contradictory god, stop bringing up Piltdown Man and Nebraska Man. They were confined cases of fraud, one of which was accidental, that were discovered by and denied by the scientific community. That doesn't disprove evolution, it proves that YOU only care about playing into your confirmation bias by appealing to very specific cases of mistakes in science. If you found a mistake in the Bible, which there are plenty of, you wouldn't disregard the entirety of it, would you? I feel bad for the people in this comment section, not because I think they're stupid, but because I think many of them are afraid to accept new ideas and allow them to fit into their worldview. It's channels and institutions like this and the Discovery Institute that prey on that flaw in humanity to push their ignorant and biased ideas. I wish the best for everyone who falls for the lies of these people.

@user-gh3wt2uf2p

Ай бұрын

Don't get confused. They ARE stupid... and religious fanatics.

@MrPensive

Ай бұрын

Well said! (Re the Bible, my favorite story is that of Onan.)

@occultislux

Ай бұрын

Can you name one of the many mistakes in the Bible?

@fapplebees8925

Ай бұрын

@@occultislux “No one has ever seen god” John 4:12 and “No man has or can see [god]” 1 Timothy 6:16 Or this obvious contradiction: “The lord would speak to Moses face to face as speaking to a friend..” Exodus 33:11 AND… “… I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved.” Genesis 32:30 God tempting man with evil “And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham…”Genesis 22:1 OR… God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man.” James 1:13 On the Sabbath “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.” Exodus 20:8 OR… “One man esteemeth one day above another: another esteemeth every day alike.” Romans 14:5 On response to assault “…thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand…” Exodus 21:23-25 OR… “…whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.” Matthew 5:39 On incest “Cursed be he that lieth with his sister, the daughter of his father, or this mother…” Deuteronomy 27:22 OR… “God said unto Abraham, as for Sara thy wife (AND HIS SISTER!)…I bless her, and give a son Genesis 17:15-16 Jesus says “… I have not come to abolish the laws of the prophets, I have come to fulfill them…” Matthew 5:17 But he also says, “I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel…” Hebews 8:16 About the crucifixion: According to John 19:17 Jesus carried his own cross. According to Mark 15:21 Simon carried it for him. About the resurrection “The women ran out of the tomb, afraid but filled with joy to tell the apostles…” Matthew 28:8 Or was it “…the women fled from the tomb. They said nothing to anyone, because they were afraid.” Mark 16:8

@occultislux

Ай бұрын

@fapplebees8925 Simply copying and pasting "contradictions" without context doesn't prove anything lol.

Happy to dismantle the best theory we have on the origins of human life but too afraid to submit their own theories/fairy tales.

@mozzarellatherat9687

Ай бұрын

“Best theory” “fairy tales” come Back when you realize your “theory” is nothing more than a belief equal in believability as all religions. There is no evidence for the addition of new information to dna nor is the evidence for millions of years for your computers always give out different dates. You don’t even have a start to your beliefs for you say a Big Bang happened which had no origin of its own. You act all high and mighty with no evidence to back it up. The reason they aren’t submitting their own is because people always try and take down the Bible without success. The Bible is a historical document written by inspired men. Jesus is real and has been proven to be real while evolution can never be proven without a time machine or enough time as to witness it.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@mozzarellatherat9687bringing up cosmology to refute biology? An inaccurate description of the Big Bang? No idea what observable means? Next batter.

@sciencerules2825

Ай бұрын

@@mozzarellatherat9687 _There is no evidence for the addition of new information to dna_ New information is added to DNA by the random genetic variations which happen in every individual in every generation. The new DNA added to the gene pool is that which is kept by selection and genetic drift. Science has known this for over 70 years.

@TheHairyHeathen

Ай бұрын

@@mozzarellatherat9687 Oh, so you DO have evidence to support the premise that an undetectable supernatural being whose own existence cannot be explained, spoke an incantation which conjured everything into existence, including fully formed multicellular organisms, out of no pre-existing matrix. Please, don't keep it to yourself, share it with us all, show us that we are wrong to reject this as a simple story made up by primitive people so ignorant of how the world worked that they didn't even know where the sun went at night.

@therick363

Ай бұрын

@@mozzarellatherat9687so you either blatantly lie or are very ignorant on the topics you spoke about….which is it?

Excellent evaluation of the supposed evolutionary evidence! May God use it to remove stumbling blocks from many. Thanks and God bless!

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

are you sure you're even the same sect of the same religion as who made the video?

Was that st Patrick's cathedral, Auckland?

FYI, debunking evolution ( which you haven’t) doesn’t prove that your god exists. Sorry, but it just doesn’t.

@piercelee9421

Ай бұрын

No one is saying it does

@albertmockel6245

Ай бұрын

@@piercelee9421 😄

@us3rG

Ай бұрын

Animal just to justify acting like one

@compandre

Ай бұрын

That wasn’t the point of the video. The point was to undermine the credibility of lots of evolution “evidence”

@RealHooksy

Ай бұрын

@@compandre yes, and it failed to do that. Nothing in the video undermines anything credible.

“Transitionary fossil between lizards and birds?” Wow, not even five minutes in, and you’re showing that you truly have no idea what the theory of evolution actually says.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

I know. Even children know that dinosaurs are not lizards.

Gotta love how the whole video is just misrepresenting evidence and then just being "nuh-uh"

I always thought Piltdown was in Wales.

Vestigial does not mean useless. Many parts of the body perform more than one function; they have a primary and a secondary function - sometimes more than one. An organ may lose it's primary function, in which case it's secondary function becomes primary, or it may be repurposed. The appendix was once thought useless, but for the last couple of decades it has been postulated as a reservoir for beneficial gut flora. You can of course live a perfectly healthy life without one.

Seriously? This guy is cherry picking.

@Bomtombadi1

Ай бұрын

One of the best.

@therick363

Ай бұрын

Of course he is

Given the size of that book you'd better have more than just a Part 2 coming.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

Considering there are over 250,000 species of fossils, he's going to be busy. And that's even before we get to genetics.

I love the stuff you guys produce - always factually convincing and so well presented. Massive thanks for all your hard work, professional knowledge and authentic, truthful insight to our origins. Whilst we may wonder why sceptics still exist and the fabled, ridiculous story of evolution continues to find favour in schools, colleges, universities etc. I'm reminded of Paul's words in Ephesians 6v12: "For we are not fighting against flesh and blood enemies, but against evil rulers and authorities of the unseen world, against mighty powers in this dark world, and against evil spirits in the heavenly places" (NLT). To accept the truth of the Genesis account subsequently requires each one of us to bend the knee to Jesus and confess that He is Lord and that's the problem for sceptics right there. They'll do it one day though because after death no-one is an atheist. Thanks again for your great work.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

This video reminds you of your perfect Bible but you still need the video?

@Censoredbyyourcult

Ай бұрын

We get it. You need magic to be real and think everyone that understands basic scientific facts must be skeptics. And it's still favored in education because it remains a fact disputed only by uneducated or dishonest creationists. Man has propaganda done a number on you. I pity you.

@philipbrayshaw6288

Ай бұрын

@@AMC2283 Sure thing .. Remind is a transitive verb - 'to put in mind'

@Moist._Robot

Ай бұрын

@@philipbrayshaw6288 This video is complete nonsense. I’ve personally researched every single one of these lies. Do you not think of fact checking anything he says?

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@philipbrayshaw6288 it was the first line of your comment that really struck me about how convincing it is. The Bible isn’t convincing enough?

The anger cones because creationists mair false claims about evolution and lie about science. It is very boring listening to creationists

@bigbabatunde1218

Ай бұрын

It's very 'boring' listening to 'evolutionists' unsupported claims you mean?

@therick363

Ай бұрын

⁠@@bigbabatunde1218what’s an evolutionist? Why do I only hear creationists use that term? You know that evolution is a scientific theory right?

@bigbabatunde1218

Ай бұрын

@@therick363 See my last post.

@bigbabatunde1218

Ай бұрын

@@therick363 The opposite of a creationist. Someone who believes in 'evolution'.

@therick363

Ай бұрын

@@bigbabatunde1218 so would you call someone who accepts the theory of gravity a gravitationalist?

All this video does is prove how much better science is rather than the dogmatic lies spread by religion. Science changes its stance on things as we learn more. How does the Bible, or any “holy” book, account for the variation we see in plants and animals?

@newsgetsold

Ай бұрын

It says they reproduce after their kind and only 2 of each kind were needed to board Noah's Ark. The dog/wolf 'kind' only ever produces canines. Have you any evidence of a reptile producing a bird, or primate producing a human? Anything at all? What is your BEST evidence? Why do modern scientists suppress the arguments in this video instead of welcoming debate? When is this "science" going to "change its stance" and accept that it cannot disprove even one single verse within any of the 66 books of the Bible?

Dude! Love the jacket & vest!

This video proves only one thing. That the scientific method has robust self-correcting mechanisms built into it, that over time weeds out error and moves us progressively closer to truth. The fact that science admits error and improves is not proof for non-science.

@anaquaduck5252

Ай бұрын

It wasn't the scientific method as such, but scientists who called out other scientists. 'Robust self-correcting' is a bit rich as bias & consensus are often ideologically driven. The scientific method is limited to repeatable, observable etc. DNA in dinosaur bones for example is argued around, rather than accepted for how it challenges the evolutionary narrative.

Ай бұрын

@@anaquaduck5252 "Scientists calling out other scientists" is exactly the scientific method. "Science" is what people do in their minds. It is not a force of nature that happens in the abstract -- it is not an impersonal process. "Ideology" is just another name for the consensus in a field -- and that changes and has changed. Read Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions. If scientists contradict each other and sometimes appear confused, that is exactly how it is supposed to operate. Science operates from a position of doubt, of questioning everything, and refuting what others claim. Contrast this with the arguments based on religion, where the "received wisdom" (the conclusion) never changes. It is the unalterable word of God. The evidence is selectively used (or ignored) to confirm what is already known.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

@@anaquaduck5252 No DNA has ever been found in dinosaur bones.

Love it. I absolutely love it. You know, plenty of evolutionist or atheist or both will be here to do their usual best to be jerks or be very polite but still not be intellectually honest and correspond to the attack us on this channel, even though Christians belong on this channel and call us trolls. Which they've actually called me a troll before as a Christian on a Christian creationism site.

@Moist._Robot

Ай бұрын

But this really isn’t anything but misleading propaganda. It’s complete nonsense.

@Psalm2710_

Ай бұрын

Found one!

@btolich

Ай бұрын

​@@Moist._Robot Nice rebuttal, especially given the exposure of the frauds referenced.

@TickyTack23

Ай бұрын

​@@Moist._Robot It's really not though. There are a lot of well educated people, including in the science, medical, and engineering fields that don't hold evolution to any high regard. Not because they are anti science, but because there are some striking flaws in evolution, and it is one of the few theories that continually moves the goal post to substantiate it's validity. It's very much equivalent to the study of theoretical physics and the contested ideas of string theory.

@annieoaktree6774

Ай бұрын

@@TickyTack23 Examples of where evolution "moved the goalposts to substantiate its validity" please. Sounds like the usual creationist argument from ignorance.

Great work!

@calvinsmith7575

Ай бұрын

Thank you! Please share and consider becoming a member if possible so we can keep making more content! : )

@nathancook2852

Ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Calvin really begging hard on this video. Gotta grow the cult, huh?

Did this video get reposted or am I just back in time again? I forget lol

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

A new video, but the same meaningless talking points creationst have been circulating for decades.

@ambiuscyben4045

Ай бұрын

@@jockyoung4491 I believe in God.. atheism is illogical lol. This had meaning to me in time, and so to make the claim it was meaningless, itself, has no meaning/merit. I was asking if this was reposted because I'm going back in the time, and it's odd to remember overlapping memories is all.

@SkepticalGodlessAussieGlober

23 күн бұрын

Well given they have nothing new other than the same old lies, it could be new or a repost - it'd be hard to tell just based on the BS.

Dang it’s crazy, it has been proven that most of the organs they Used to say we do not need, is wrong like you should have your tonsils probably throughout your life anyways, this video talks a lot about some really interesting things and the tonsils were just one of them

@TheHairyHeathen

Ай бұрын

I can name many vestigial structures which no longer perform any useful function. Lets start with the _lacrimal caruncle,_ the small part in the corner of your eye which used to be a third eyelid and which we no longer use. There is a bump on the back of your ear called _Darwin's tubercule_ which in our ancestors used to be an attachment point for muscles to move the ear, then there is the _posterior, anterior, superior, and transverse auricular muscles_ which actually produce electrical signals trying to move our ears towards a sound, but are unable to actually do so because of the anatomy of our ears been on the side of heads and not on the top of our head. In our forearms there is the _palmaris longus_ tendon which is lacking in either one or both arms in 14% of the population, and similarly in the leg the _plantaris tendon_ is absent in one or both legs in 12.8% of the population, because they have no useful function. Of course we are all familiar with wisdom teeth which have nowhere to emerge in our relatively small jaw, and frequently become impacted, infected, and before antibiotics would frequently kill people. Of course vestigial does NOT even mean that a structure has no function, it actually means that it has a reduced or altered function, sometimes being exapted for an entirely different purpose.

@bigsammcbam6123

Ай бұрын

​@@TheHairyHeathenEvidence forthcoming anytime soon for your outlandish claims? Didn't think so. Most adults grow out of storytelling except you lot.

@TheHairyHeathen

Ай бұрын

@@bigsammcbam6123 So exactly which of the vestigial structures I named are you challenging, and can you show that they still perform their original function? What about the _erector pili_ muscles we still have, but now do nothing except give you goosebumps, but in our more furry ancestors would make the individual hairs stand upright trapping air and helping to warm the creature, explain why they are not vestigial? I think the adults who haven't grown up are those who are repeating ancient stories, made up by primitive tribal people, about their magical _"heavenly father"_ and still actually refer to themselves as this pretend sky daddy's _"children"._ In fact they don't even see themselves as capable of decent behaviour, not because they want to be responsible adults, but because their make believe parent is constantly watching them and is only going to reward those who do what they are told, and is going to perpetually punish those who don't accede to it's abusive demands to be loved.

so instead of challenging actual experts, they attack strawmen from comments on the internet. is this garbage, really the best you have?

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

It is all they have ever had, which is why they have been circulating around these same talking points for decades.

@samcolserra2425

Ай бұрын

How was any of the examples strawmanned here?

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

@@samcolserra2425 The 3 cases of fraud from over 100 years ago were never the "best evidence for evolution". They prove nothing. His other examples are all still good evidence of evolution, even if some of the original details turned out to be wrong. There is nothing in this video that even tried to argue that evolution can't be true.

@akra9304

Ай бұрын

​@@samcolserra2425 Homo Neanderthal: he oversimplified his last statment "a human cannot evolve into another human" in order to mislead the audience into thinking that's nonsense. In reality, "a human evolving into another human" means that some specie of human got certain characteristics trhough natural selection and because of that they survived better and spread their genes better. the cases of scientists being wrong like with the horsr example and the "two humans" is not a proof that evolution is untrue, it was simply a mistake done by scientists that later got disproved as more evidence showed us so. Saying that because scientists make mistakes they are wrong is false, science is about formulating a hypothesis based on facts, then you test wheter the evidence boost it or goes against it in order to refine more and more until you have a theory (in scientific terms, a theory was a hypothesis that was highly tested by lots of scientists and is what the evidence points to the most). vestigial organs: some guy up here already answered that, but just so, our wisdom tooth is confirmed to not be in use for us anymore, as we have adapted over time to have smaller and smaller jaws leaving to not enough space in our mouths to fit the teeth anymore, thats why most ppl in the world have to remove it. And still talking about wisdom teeth, im sure you have already heard that it was used for crushing bones in earlier times. "evolution" is better understood by using "adaptation", if a species "evolves" that means the species has adapted to their current environmental situation. now, defining exactly when some species turns into a new species is a complicated process because: it mostly occurs in long time periods, adding speculation to the equation of defining when that "change" occurred. As a agnostic, i want to seek the truth, i have stumbled across many philosophical and scientific arguments for both sides, and what this guy is saying about evolution is just nonsense. -sincerely, a random guy on yt you will forget in 2-3 days

@78endriago

Ай бұрын

@@samcolserra2425 so you completely failed to notice that no experts in the fields of evolution were on the video to present their "best proofs of evolution" like the video claimed. when you do notice that, then you will understand the video is nothing but a strawman.

If lying about science were an Olympic sport Calvin Smith would sweep the podium.

Would be great if you can discuss the genetic evidence for evolution including retroviruses.

@jockyoung4491

Ай бұрын

I'm sure they have some dishonest way of dismissing that one too

@bigsammcbam6123

Ай бұрын

​@@jockyoung4491None of you are posting any evidence in support of your claims.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@bigsammcbam6123it’s only your fault if you don’t know it and are too lazy to look it up