As a retired software developer, I know machine language when I see it. And a complex program implies a Programmer.

@sciencerules2825

2 ай бұрын

Sadly you don't know basic biology when you see it.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

​@@sciencerules2825 Spliceosome = 'basic biology' : )

@samburns3329

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Yes Calvin, despite your willful ignorance it is basic biology.

@mauricedicke9527

2 ай бұрын

@@samburns3329well show me your time of the gaps theory. With a lot of time and a lot of luck, magically life arise out of non life

@normanhines5189

2 ай бұрын

@@sciencerules2825 I know that DNA and its processes form a modified Turing machine that assemble proteins from amino acids. I also teach statistics: the only way this would happen randomly would require more time than has elapsed since the Big Bang.

Evolution didn't even enter my mind during this video. But something else sure did! Wonderfully done!

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

That's funny, considering that evolution is the reason for these processes.

@greatbriton8425

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 You and I both know that evolution is impossible. "Given enough time" to break down, these molecules would never get off the ground. Besides, life works by proteins, not DNA. It is the proteins that replicate the DNA, that read the DNA, transcribe it and build themselves from it. So where did these many proteins come from? They just SeLf-AsSemBLeD around their DNA which SeLf-AsSemBLeD at the same time and the same place with the same code sequence.

@TheMickeymental

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 Evolution does not exist causing speciation, you do not have a clue in the area of science.

@joshyvert4409

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440explain to me how life can come from non-life or how nothing can come from nothing?

@Nickleotide

2 ай бұрын

​@@joshyvert4409 Explain how your magic works again😂

Good Friday, Jesus has risen

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

Actually, jesus didn't die. You can't kill a god. Only a god can do that. Which would mean the "christian" god killing himself.

@mrpush2532

2 ай бұрын

The God-man Jesus Christ not only physically died, he suffered horrible before that! Then, he took the punishment spiritually to pay the sin debt of the entire world! You need to catch up on your biblical truth.

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

@@mrpush2532 You first. Something or somebody died, but not jesus. You can't kill a god. The temporary death of his human carcass cannot be explained. There was never any risk that jesus was going to die and stay dead. Since god knew all of this in advance the whole thing is a ridiculous charade. The bizarre and contradictory tales found in Luke 24.51 and Acts 1.9 have jesus and his half dead human carcass ascending up to heaven, another absurdity. You will notice that Acts 1.9 has jesus serving a forty day period of spiritual cleansing, a pagan notion, and completely ridiculous in the case of jesus.

@mattbrook-lee7732

2 ай бұрын

He didn't rise on good Friday. That's when he died

@mrpush2532

2 ай бұрын

@mattbrook-lee7732 HI, he didn't die on a Friday he died on Wednesdayish at sundown. He rose on Saturday at sundown. They found him gone early (still dark) Sunday moring. Evening then day for Jewish days. You can't get 3 days and nights from Friday to Sunday. Its not possible.

Doesn't take a scientist to see that such complexity can't happen by "random chance." And to think God literally just spoke it all into existence! How wonderful God is!

@samburns3329

2 ай бұрын

Good thing then evolution doesn't work by just random chance. 🙂

@StudentDad-mc3pu

2 ай бұрын

Why? Why can't it, what is your evidence?

@billcook4768

2 ай бұрын

You are correct. It’s not random chance. But evolution isn’t random chance. Study up on it from reliable sources. You’ll be amazed at how cool it is

@georg7120

2 ай бұрын

And how could such complexity like a god happen?

@25dollarbill24

2 ай бұрын

@@samburns3329 _"Good thing then evolution doesn't work by just random chance."_ Good thing that by your nonsense word, "evolution", you're not even referring to something that _occurs,_ much less _works._ 🙂

Evolutionists argument is that it took so long for everything in the universe to evolve to the state where life became possible. On their time scale, we did appear after eons. However, to believe that life automatically comes along at some point( Hawking’s theory) depends upon an incredible confluence of circumstances that defies the rational mind.

@jockyoung4491

2 ай бұрын

There is nothing to say life is inevitable. But if it didn't happen we wouldn't be here to talk about it.

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

If you are claiming an invisible god who invokes organic chemistry and then commands it to perform virgin birth, water walking and demon casting then you might be defying rational thought yourself.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

What defies a rational mind is to ignore what we observe are natural causes and explains and to think some god is responsible

@airman122469

2 ай бұрын

What did Hawking know about life? Dude was a cosmologist that explained black holes.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

We only have this universe to conclude whether life would be inevitable. However, we do understand much about the natural processes that yielded life on Earth. It is hence reasonable to assume that life could have developed elsewhere.

God is so good!!! Wow!!!

@peadarruane6582

2 ай бұрын

Not that great since this complex system is full of mistakes causing things like birth defects, cancer, congenital diseases etc.

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

Until God slaps you with Isaiah 45:7

@peadarruane6582

2 ай бұрын

@@HangrySaturn so a suposedly all good deity creates evil... good to know.. at least according to a book written by bronze age society....

@deadwalking100

2 ай бұрын

@@HangrySaturnHow does I am the LORD, and there is none else. [7] I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. Relate to the above example of mistakes?

@johnl4933

2 ай бұрын

Do you still say that to children and babies dying from cancer?

The editing in this video is impressive, I really like the content too, thanks!

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Thanks! I'll pass your comment along to our editor : )

@razark9

2 ай бұрын

The anti-science propaganda has to be appealing after all.

@drewwhiteddc6018

2 ай бұрын

@@razark9 You mean anti-extrapolation and anti philosophical assumptions parading as science.

@razark9

2 ай бұрын

@@drewwhiteddc6018 I'm sure that's your excuse for denying all science you can't work your interpretation of religious scripture around. Everything else you probably have no problems with lol.

@drewwhiteddc6018

2 ай бұрын

@@razark9 Nah, I was questioning science and how they knew things that seemed extrapolated when I was 15, long before I even knew creationism was a thing. Why is the world such a mess if the experts are in control and are so smart they couldn't be wrong, and thus tell us with total intolerance what to believe with their non sequiturs and presentations that never give us sufficient evidence in an accommodating way but hide things behind expert journals and don't help us traverse them effectively?

I seek you Lord every day. Jesus you are my strength. Jesus give me strength. Lord both of my sons are special needs they require so much from me. Lord I continue to struggle in providing for them. Father God it is overwhelming and challenging especially now because I’m homeschooling them so my hours to work are limited. As a single mother I’m barely getting by. As I struggle to buy groceries and as I struggle to pay rent Lord give me strength. With you Lord Jesus by my side I can’t fail.

In the beginning GOD. I've looked at that statement as GOD claiming His authorship of creation and the Bible. It's just like a master painter or sculptor or writer signs their own work. Thanks for your explanation of DNA.

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

All praise to the Wise Lord, Ahura Mazda!

@sidecarmisanthrope5927

2 ай бұрын

Only your god "Yahweh" was a Levantine deity. One of 70 Children of the god EL! He was a petty drunk who liked to fight humans and was jealous of his more powerful sister. I guess that is why the buybull says he is a jealous god!

@gerardmoloney433

2 ай бұрын

Jesus said, " I Am the Way the Truth and the Life, nobody comes to the Father except through Me " " Before Abraham was I Am " There is no other name under heaven who can save. Name one.

@sidecarmisanthrope5927

2 ай бұрын

@@gerardmoloney433 Allegedly! You have zero contemporary, concrete, tangible and irrefutable evidence that this Jesus character ever existed.

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@@sidecarmisanthrope5927 Christians claim 43 lines of evidence for JC, not one stands up to scrutiny.

Happy Easter Christ is risen!

The dude is wearing 6 layers. That must be the coldest library ever.

@nocensorship2253

2 ай бұрын

Bbrrrrrr!

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

Adds to his smugness.

Given enough time and honest scientific research, most evolutionists will understand that there is a Creator.

@tims5268

2 ай бұрын

And yet the more time goes by and the more honest research there is, the more people move away from Christianity.

@JordanPost-zd6eb

2 ай бұрын

That’s not true. It’s growing. 3 billion Christians around the world and only single digit percentage of atheists. Plus 100 thousand Christians martyred for their faith every year. We have more Christian dying for their faith and still more of them than atheist.

@cptrikester2671

2 ай бұрын

@@tims5268 more of a philosophical problem than a scientific one.

@war13death

2 ай бұрын

And yet there's countless instances where people, atheist, Muslim, agnostic, Buddhist, etc sought the​ truth and became Christian.@@tims5268

@fouracrefamily9801

2 ай бұрын

I'm sure most evolutionists would accept that time to millions of years! 😂

Some would say that time and mutation would cause this, but entropy is Asymmetrical to time, space and matter not to mention violate the limit of mathematical probabilities. If you don't play the lottery because of those probabilities, why would you bet on true impossibility?

@samburns3329

2 ай бұрын

Heh. Another Gomer who doesn't understand thermodynamics of entropy or biology.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

You're waffling and not contributing to the discussion. Please read a Biology textbook.

@dreadassembly4087

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 That's not an argument. I could say the same thing. A Biology textbook? No biology text book can prove through the scientific method of repeatable testing and observation that time can have the type of effect that evolutionists claim. I have read about the evolutionary frauds put in Biology text books that were thankfully caught by scientists without personal agenda. Are you OK with fraud as long as it fits your bias? See I actually said something true. You didn't even put fourth an argument

@toddashley407

2 ай бұрын

​​@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440how about reply that responds with something of substance yourself?

@KenJackson_US

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 I encourage you to read your biology textbook more thoughtfully and not blindly accept authoritative statements on faith. Microbe-to-man evolution is a violation of natural selection.

Amen. I love the ending: The answer is revealed in the first sentence of the Bible.

@saintmalaclypse3217

2 ай бұрын

I love it too, because he got it wrong. The original Hebrew doesn't say that.

@danieldussaud9611

2 ай бұрын

@@saintmalaclypse3217 how stupid do you honestly think people are?

@naughtyUphillboy

2 ай бұрын

@gerardmoloney433

2 ай бұрын

​@@saintmalaclypse3217what does it say?

@christiangames3504

2 ай бұрын

@@saintmalaclypse3217bro what does the hebrew say. bro just runs away after saying something.💀

This is a very well produced video. I'm an evolutionist (right-wing conservative/libertarian). But my hats off to you on the production value of the video.

@dulls8475

2 ай бұрын

What about the production values of Christ?

@humansubspecies

2 ай бұрын

Not sure what you are referring to? @@dulls8475

@tonylloy327

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣 You are so *not* an 'evolutionist'. Because if you were, you wouldn't refer to yourself as an 'evolutionist'. And you would (hopefully) also recognize that there are so many fundamental mistakes and misrepresentations in this video that you would *not* be praising its "production value".

@renierramirez9534

2 ай бұрын

What would be your reason for not to trust in Jesus?

@humansubspecies

2 ай бұрын

I quote the Doobie Brothers - "Jesus is just alright with me." I have nothing against Jesus. Just not my area of interest. I'm interested in hominins - Homo erectus, Denisovans, Neanderthals, Australopithecines, Sahelanthropus tchadensis. I'm interested in the great story of our human origins. I'm also interested in fighting the left. I am a far right-wing libertarian. I despise socialism. So, you guys, presumably are my allies. I would guess that y'all are conservatives. Which makes it odd you are so hostile to me. We are allies in politics. You do support Trump right? I would hope so. @@renierramirez9534

Excellent presentation! All the glory to God Almighty! Thank you for sharing and Happy Easter!

@OmarBenjumea

2 ай бұрын

Easter is the pagan goddess Ishtar (Isis) 🤣

It must be SUPER COLD in that room. He is wearing like 47 layers lol

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

No, he’s just a terrible dresser

@newtonmutea

2 ай бұрын

What's more cold is dying without Christ

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

@@newtonmutea Or without a coat.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

It just adds to his pompous attitude.

@donaldmonzon1774

2 ай бұрын

Canadian in Canada I think....liberals probably ruined economy.... can't afford to heat studio probably...🤪

Life depends on huge amounts of information and highly complex, specified, integrated, dense, efficient and miniaturized codes and coded information.

@jockyoung4491

2 ай бұрын

Biological evolution increases and rearranges DNA "information all the time". What's the problem?

@airman122469

2 ай бұрын

No it doesn’t. We think of DNA as a code, but that’s not really accurate. DNA is just a templating mechanism for replication of various objects inside of a cell. That’s it. The entire watchmaker argument is an appeal to ignorance.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

Wrong, my friend. DNA simply instructs the cell regarding which proteins need to be constructed based on the arrangement of nucleotides. That's how encoded information and, in fact, demonstrates that evolution is a fact.

@jonatasmachado7217

2 ай бұрын

@@airman122469 DNA encodes the instructions to make and operate biological sructures and functions. But someone had to have all the information and create the codes. In the beginning was information. In the beginning was the Word.

@jonatasmachado7217

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 the cell needs DNA to come into being in the first place. And you need a mind to give meaning to sequences of nucleotides. In the beginning was intelligence and information, huge amounts of both. A cell is too complex to arise by chance. No scientist has ever observed it. It has to be imagined as evolution from fish to fishermen has to be imagined. As far as scientists can observe, life never arises by chance and finches "evolve" into finches, as Darwin observed, Dawkins observes and we all observe. Evolution is fake science. It has to be imagined.

0:55 That’s a Really nice Jacket! Where’d you get??

Could you please start linking the first parts of a series to the next?

Awesome program!

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

No, definitely not.

Critical thinking! You don’t need to be Mr. Spock to see the logic behind the presentation on the complexity of DNA. We are fearfully & wonderfully made. God schooled Job on His magnificent creation!

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

Quantify this complexity please

@user-xy5qf3lo5d

2 ай бұрын

Quantify? The entire video presentation on DNA was created to illustrate that you CAN'T "quantify" the complexity of DNA anymore than you can quantify the stars in the heavens or the sand on the seashores. I don't understand why you troll this particular KZread site? People like yourself will never comprehend the majesty of God the creator, you're a reprobate. Read Romans 1:18-28, it explains who a reprobate is. I'd highly recommend you also read and consider the Bible's account of God speaking to Job. Job 38-41

@TacoBel

2 ай бұрын

@bomtombadi1 LOL That js the best April fools joke I have heard all day… Sorry, had to pu out a pun. I hope I was not too rude and you have my most sincere apologies if I was. God, (if he exists) wile being able to appear in a quantifiable form like Jesus, is not quantifiable. And Creator God is not scientifically probable as well. However, the very fact that science shows a begining to time, space, and matter. Proves that something outside of time space and matter exists. That is basic rules of logic applied to known science. This now enters the realm of the supernatural (beyond nature). Science demands the supernatural. Nothing else can be said by humans except going off of assumptions based off of the one source we have that is beyond nature. God. Believe in evolution or not. God is proven NECESSARY by science.

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

@@TacoBel so to be clear here, god cannot be scientifically determined, but is nonetheless scientifically proven. Science shows a beginning the universe’s *current state,* not a beginning to the universe. Your “logic” is non-existent.

@cdub5033

2 ай бұрын

when viewing animation of proteins & enzymes at work, like little nano machines doing their very specific job. it’s easy to conclude that this didn’t just happen by accident.

Excellent video! Thanks.

Keep up the good work

Happy to have found your Channel and agree I'm sure this is why they hate this video too but i don't I shared it on social media and added it to my playlist❤

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

"christians", in their tormented state, presume themselves to be psychic. They "know" stuff about people. Their persecution complex sees hatred where there is none and demons where there are none. Paradoxically, it is the creationist that hates the theory of evolution in spite of the fact that many "christians" support it. Of course , there is no consistency in "christianity" and no consensus among "christians" who occasionally hate each other.

While there is much speculation about how life arose, what does actual scientific observation and experimentation reveal? The answer: we have never, no not once, observed anything like a ‘primordial soup’, nor any life arising spontaneously through chemical and naturalistic processes. Life only comes from life.

@mattbrook-lee7732

2 ай бұрын

What's your point. Do you think if you haven't personally observed something it must be impossible? Because we have never observed electrons. But your using them to write this

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

The Miller Urey experiment was conducted over 70 years ago and produced all the amino acids required for human life as well as a lot more. Evolution is fact and the earth was once lifeless, the bit in between we can't yet prove is not reason to invent a magical sky daddy.

@lionel4685

2 ай бұрын

@@mattbrook-lee7732 also, that we didn't observe something yet doesn't mean we will not one day. electrons never didn't exist before they were known / observed.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

@@lionel4685 Bible told 2000 years ago that all we see is built of invisible substance. Natural science found this only in 19th century ...

You've got something wrong. Splicing happens on mRNA level, which is one gene. So stating splicing happens "between genes" is wrong. It is not like we splice RNA fragments togheter from genes located at the other side of the DNA. We also know very well how splicing works (read a book), there is also a splicing mechanism which doesn't need the splicosome complex. So in evolution splicing existed before the complex. Now to awnser the questions 1) By splicing there can be multiple forms of one protein be enoceded in 1 gene. It's way more energy efficient to have those in 1 gene than in multiple 2) Evolution took place over BILLIONS of years, we can't imagine how slow it goes, of course complex things are formed, like I said there is splicing without the complex. Then the complex can evolve to make the proces better and make less mistakes. 3) See point 2, evolution, if new mutation in protein did splicing wrong, organism dies, mutation dies. If mutation made it better, organism lives, mutation lives. By just saying, it is complex so someone must have made it is very dumb. Doens't prove anything at all.

Thank you.

How do i donate to Answers in Genesis Canada?

@christchurchottawa

2 ай бұрын

Aig Canada website

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Hello and thanks for asking : ). If you go to the answers in genesis website from outside Canada you will see a button at the top right which allows you to go to the various countries AiG operates in. Click the Canada tab and then you will see a donate button there. Thanks for your considering donating to our ministry! Blessings, Cal

@Moist._Robot

2 ай бұрын

Sit on the toilet. Let your bowels loose. Flush toilet.

@Moist._Robot

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 It is hard to imagine how anyone in command of these facts could harbour any reasonable doubt. These facts are derived from the very same science and technology that has deciphered the genetic cause of hundreds of diseases, invented dozens of new gene derived medicines, and revolutionised forensics and agriculture. Yet, in the face of all the evidence, there remains much doubt and outright denial of the reality of biological evolution. P. 230 The making of the fittest. DNA and the ultimate forensic record of evolution. Sean B Carroll

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

@@Moist._Robot Evolution has never been observed...it has nothing to do with science and technological advances.

As a simple, but rarely used, paradigm of software development we can take the value of PI, which is easily calculated, and then have a start value and length of message and every possible value can be stored in this one number. Not quite DNA but because it is infinitely non-repeating at some point in the fraction every possible value exists and I just need to know where to look and how much to take. Seems that DNA is similar to that. But far better made.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

Stop comparing biological systems to man-made objects.

@steveOCalley

2 ай бұрын

Never knew this.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

That's not how DNA works.

@geoffsutton78

2 ай бұрын

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 No analogy is perfect. But it's a reasonable approximation to give people the concept. DNA has start and end point for where the information is stored, and that information is retrieved in a similar manner. Then it is manipulated as needed (IE cutting and joining the necessary parts) the finally put to use. PI takes it out of the "mythical" realm of biology and puts it into something most people are aware of, thus making it simpler to comprehend.

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

Why do software developers think they are experts in all things biology?

Do you know about what professor Dr. Israël Rubinstein discovered whil doing research on DNA? About the 10-5-6-5 string?

So Wise , Thank You

The film points out the following: How could this process learn where to start and where to stop in the correct sequence to produce a correct result for a brand new functional protein? Remember, there are infinitely more ways to make mistakes than to get things right. This is the constant question posed by creationists who believe the answer must be "intelligent design". But the answer is very simple. Infinitely more mistakes are "committed" naturally out in nature. The changes that take place are small. But considering that each human (no other animals included here) carries about 300 mutations - most of them neither beneficial nor harmful - the people now alive (about 7 billion) have about 2,100,000,000,000 mutations available. During the last 2000 - 4000 years, no decisive genetic changes among humans have occurred. Thus, sooner or later, favorable mutations will lead to this "incredible" lucky event that our genome changes positively, because time plus number of mutations makes the equation less incredible than you seem to understand. Science knows that the chances are not great. But it also knows that they are nevertheless large enough for the theory of evolution to be stable and scientifically confirmed and mapped. No, "evolutionists" don't hate this video. Either! And then you throw in the Bible at the end. What does it have to do with this? Where in the Bible are the riddles surrounding DNA described in a way that proves that the Christian God is behind the explanation? You are welcome to disprove the theory of evolution. But then do it with COUNTER-EVIDENCE. The Bible is not enough. It is a book with old texts that do not prove anything about DNA, possibly telling about the results of what you have to report with evidence after all, not with Bible texts. If you want to highlight the Bible as reliable, you must describe HOW it is the most reliable source. Purely hypothetically, the Bible can rest on the principles of evolutionary theory. Given that the theory of evolution better than any other explanatory model describes the development of species, perhaps you should instead start thinking about whether it supports your hypothesis about God. "God created." Maybe so, but how? Well, via what is described in the theory of evolution, in that case. But then you actually have to prove that it is so: That the Christian god is behind it all. How do you prove it? Not just with the words "God created." It is an assertion, not a proof.

@ronaldadams1469

2 ай бұрын

The bible says THE FOOL SAYS IN HIS HEART THERE IS NO GOD. I was one of those fools who believed evolution was true and that there is no God. The bible is not a science book it a book from the God who created us and to tell us how we can know him. But all the science mentioned in His book is spot on. Let me give an example. When God created man He made man to live forever . And scientists have discovered that the very thing that they believed brought about evolution, mutations is the very thing that is coursing us to age and die are mutations. Every living thing on this earth animals and plants are deteriorating. Each generation has at least a hundred more mutations in them than their parents and if you go back in time only about 6 to 7 thousand years man was perfect, not a monkey like evolution would have you believe. Mutations courses devolution not evolution. Let me give you another example. Scientists in recent studie doing genetic studies that every human being on earth come from three women plus or minus 4 to 5 thousand years ago . Evolutionary Scientists were floored. Scientists who believed God's word weren't confused because they know that God wiped out every living being on this earth 4500 years ago in a world wide flood and four women came off the ark the one was Noah's wife and she was to old to have children but her three daughters in laws re populated the world . And those are the three woman that every living being on this earth today came from whether you believe it or not.

@jige1225

2 ай бұрын

@@ronaldadams1469 Man, what nonsense you are talking...

Why do you block comments that prove your wrong?

@James-zw4tn

2 ай бұрын

This message you text that I just read isn't deleted? What's up.

@skribbbly

2 ай бұрын

What was the comment?

@Justmekpc

2 ай бұрын

@@skribbblythat dna is not designed as it causes children’s cancer and plenty of other defects Over 60% of the population needs glasses The sign of design is simplicity not complexity

@beerboots

2 ай бұрын

@@James-zw4tn I've had two of my comments deleted too, the second one being where I accuse him of deleting the other comment. This'll probably get deleted too but for now I'll repost it here as I happened to screenshot it to show a friend - 'Calvin you are one of the most disingenuous, intellectually dishonest people I have had the displeasure of observing in a KZread comment section. To the point that I'm beginning to wonder if you're a troll who does not actually genuinely believe what you purport to believe. Go read the Wikipedia page on Directional Selection for an overview of what it means and how it works. Weltschmerzistofhaufig2440's use of the words 'clear bias' in regards to favoured phenotypes is not descriptive of a 'thinking' bias. It is a use of language that personifies an impersonal process for the sake of practical communication. If you want to abuse semantics as creationists do when for example, an atheist describes the 'design' of a natural object, by all means go ahead. But we (level-headed observers) know what you're doing and how full of crap you are.'

@beerboots

2 ай бұрын

I've made 4 comments that have been removed now, including my response to this post. I give up. You win Calvin, good for you.

The Lord is in the details!

What happens to the introns after being snipped out?

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

They fall off a desk.

@mattbrook-lee7732

2 ай бұрын

Really good question. Introns may be further processed or destroyed after splicing. They may be processed to produce regulatory RNA sequences like long non coding RNAs or microRNAs which are used to switch genes on and off. They may also be destroyed to release free nucleotides which can then be used to make new RNA molecules in the cell.

@lastchance8142

2 ай бұрын

Non-coding sections of the mRNA are simply cut up by yet other systems of enzymes that must recognize, prime, and finally recycle the RNA into the cytoplasm. Of course, this is highly regulated otherwise "good" RNA would be destroyed by these systems. It is currently not a fully understood process. It also begs the question: how did cells survive until such systems randomly "evolved"?

@kellrik66

2 ай бұрын

@@lastchance8142 But are they reabsorbed? Used in someway not noticed? What actually happens to those sections?

@lastchance8142

2 ай бұрын

@@kellrik66 The nucleotides are reused to make other RNA products. Think of them as the "bricks" which can be reused to build another wall.

“Religion is a phase a species goes through when it evolves enough intelligence to ask profound questions but not enough to answer them” Bill Flavell

@HS-zk5nn

2 ай бұрын

You shall not pass. Gandalf the grey

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn No one is worshiping Gandalf. Most people are smart enough to realize a work of fiction when they see it.

@HS-zk5nn

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 red herring fallacy. No one is talking about worshiping

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@HS-zk5nn You implied it... not me.

@HS-zk5nn

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 nobody worships Gandalf either. You are very confused

Thanks for the video, Calvin. You, along with everybody else at AiG, do great work. It's a blessing to have your level of analysis and knowledge provided as a free service to us! Evolutionists' faith in the power of mutation + natural selection knows no bounds. Even with natural selection working on an endless supply of mutations, you would not end up with the beautiful symmetry that we see in nature. It's very telling that our internal organs are not perfectly symmetrical (liver, spleen, coiled up intestines, heart, etc.), yet our external appearance is symmetrical. And that this applies to nearly every creature, leaf, blade of grass, pinecone, etc. just goes to show how intentionally designed the world is for our aesthetical benefit. The documentary, "is Genesis History," points out that we have found collagen in dinosaur fossils, nearly eliminating the possibility that the fossils are millions of years old. The more time goes on, the more complex the genetic code is understood to be, and the more we realize that the millions / billions of years models are simply not a fact (merely an interpretation of the data). Evolutionary scientists dismiss dating results that don't line up with what they NEED to be true for their worldview. I expect that given more time, the evolutionary worldview will be abandoned in favor of some other atheistic worldview, because these scientists simply can't allow God in the door.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

AiG cherry picks science. As such they can’t do great work. Simple as that. Evolutionists…only creationists use that term. Do you also call me a gravitationalist? I bet you don’t. Why?

@burnttoast2790

2 ай бұрын

*Evolutionists' faith in the power of mutation + natural selection knows no bounds. Even with natural selection working on an endless supply of mutations, you would not end up with the beautiful symmetry that we see in nature.* Funny then that we _don't_ see such "beautiful symmetry" in nature. You're just biased by an outwards view of members of your clade. *It's very telling that our internal organs are not perfectly symmetrical (liver, spleen, coiled up intestines, heart, etc.), yet our external appearance is symmetrical.* Wow, it's almost as if our symmetry is limited only to those portions of our body that are relevant to interacting with the outside world. *And that this applies to nearly every creature, leaf, blade of grass, pinecone, etc. just goes to show how intentionally designed the world is for our aesthetical benefit.* And yet the only organisms we see that _are_ consistently symmetrical in the manner you imply are motile members of the Bilateria. Y'know, the sort of organisms that have mostly-mobile lives? The group _we_ belong to? *The documentary, "is Genesis History," points out that we have found collagen in dinosaur fossils, nearly eliminating the possibility that the fossils are millions of years old.* Mary Schweitzer, the scientist who made this discovery? She _was_ a creationist, before her research turned her away from that load of bullsh1t3. Well, that and you lot going about and misrepresenting her work. *The more time goes on, the more complex the genetic code is understood to be,* And of which only about 10% at max is confirmed to be useful. *and the more we realize that the millions / billions of years models are simply not a fact (merely an interpretation of the data).* Oh, that the Earth is many millions of years old _is_ a fact, one confirmed by the data since the 1800s. Even religiously-motivated opponents of Darwin's theory realized this. *Evolutionary scientists dismiss dating results that don't line up with what they NEED to be true for their worldview.* We've heard it before, dude. And your whining of "MUH CONSP1RACY" has never held any water. *I expect that given more time, the evolutionary worldview will be abandoned in favor of some other atheistic worldview, because these scientists simply can't allow God in the door.* Tell that to the Christians who accept evolution.

@razark9

2 ай бұрын

Another anti-science religious drone projecting his need for faith onto the worldwide scientific consensus. It's so tired and so desperate.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

"Evolutionists' faith in the power of mutation + natural selection knows no bounds." - True. It's the Almighty Happenstance that commands unconditional faith from its followers against the natural laws and mathematical odds. "Even with natural selection working on an endless supply of mutations," - This evolutionist theory of "creative mutations" is one of the most absurd theories mankind has ever produced. It tells of the desperation that rose among atheists when they started to understand that there is no genetic mechanism that could allow intraspecific variation ("micro evolution") proceed to evolution that could produce new life forms from existing life forms. The abstracts of "micro" and "macro" are totally different processes without any mutual interface. That is, if the "macro evolution" existed in the first place which it does not. Since the discovery of mutations, science has always known that mutations are destructive, not constructive. If they create something, it's because they destroy certain genes so that recessive genes get dominant. We speak of devolution, not evolution. This devolution can be useful for adaptation but it starts the path that leads to extinction in the long run. Scientists like Ohta, Kimura, Elena and others have estimated that the proportion of useful mutations is so low that it can’t be statistically measured! [Ohta, T., Molecular evolution and polymorphism. Natl Inst Genet Mishima Japan 76:148-167, 1977.] [Kimura, M., Model of effective neutral mutaitons in which selective constraint is incorporated. PNAS 76:3440-3444, 1979.] [Elena, S.F. et al, Distribution of fitness effects caused by random insertion mutations in E. Coli. Gentetica 102/103:349-358, 1998.] Science doesn't know evolutionary beneficial mutations that could transform the body plan of any given organism i.e. to generate (macro)evolution. All known mutations have been non-structural like sickle-cell mutation, lactose tolerance, wingless flies, antibiotic resistant bacteria, metabolic changes, colour changes etc. These are devolution by destroyed genes, not evolution.

I was not an evolutionist until I watched this, and I dont hate it ...things actually make more sense now. thank you

The genetic code is truly awesome. And I would agree that it has properties that are that of a language. But this language is only 20 words in total. So comparison with a language like English is a bit of a stretch. Its like comparing signals that birds use to communicate with human language

Brilliant presentation !

very recent discoveries are demonstrating autocatalytic reactions , that form pre life , and this prosses is natural,.

@h.gonyaulax2190

2 ай бұрын

But AIG will always claim that there is a designer behind.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

That form 'pre-life'... : )

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575yes, Calvin. As in molecules which do and don’t have the necessary attributes for what we consider life.

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 Well, where did the molecules come from in the first place? You have got to assume that they conveniently arose! Or you have got to assume that they are eternal. In any case, that is not a better position than do theists claim. It is actually a worse position of supernaturality. Or do you care to redefine words? Perhaps you can insist that either option you have is natural. Sadly insistence can't get you out of the conundrum you are in!!

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

@@user-zu2zo8ji4n so you going to just keep pushing this back to a very uncreative god that just created hydrogen and let it all happen? The universe *as we know it* started the expansion of a singularity. Nobody knows how that singularity started. What is wrong with this being eternal, while your god being eternal is no big deal? How is this a worse position, and how is anything supernatural invoked? Sounds more like projection to me. Redefine words? Where have I even remotely suggested that? What conundrum? The one that YOU have tried to put me in?

I am an atheist, so enjoy your Easter. Be good to each other.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Thanks! You as well.

Yeah God is good. One day all will know there is a God and nobody is an atheist in hell. At that point in time everyone knows.

@burnttoast2790

2 ай бұрын

That Hell is a thing people can be sent to is a sign God isn't worth the time of day, let alone any worship.

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

I guess we’ll see you there, too. Right, @inthelight? After all, here you are, living, and pridefully proclaiming your fetish desire to point and laugh and gloat. To say, “I told you so,” to everyone who thought you crazy?

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

Also, your fine line is Allahu Akbar, so are you a Muslim?

@inthelightofhisglory9614

2 ай бұрын

@@burnttoast2790 that is the dumbest thing anyone can say. You know it exists and you know the way to not end up there and you still choose to reject it. That's not God's fault. That's your fault.

@Censoredbyyourcult

2 ай бұрын

Nobody is a christian in (INSERT MYTHOLOGY HERE) hell. At that point, everyone knows (INSERT MYTHOLOGY HERE) is right. Hell while being imaginary makes an excellent point about the god of the bible not being benevolent.

Well written and presented. Thank you for another high quality video.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

Seriously?

Fascinating. AMEN.

This made my head spin!

Irreducible design? You mean if I lose one of my kidneys, or how about my tonsils, or how about my gaule blater, how about my appendix? If Irreducible Coplexity is correct, then if your missing any of these things, then your not considered human anymore. Right?

@thefactoryratgenius4659

2 ай бұрын

No, not at all.

@jasontempleton2445

2 ай бұрын

Just like the watch found in the field, we shouldn't be able to live without all our components. This is not logical when you consider we can live without the above-mentioned. If NO, how does that fit in the model of Irreducible Coplexity?

@kevinrtres

2 ай бұрын

@@jasontempleton2445 Firstly you've hit on the incredible SYSTEM design of the human body - that it can indeed function without quite a bit of its contents. However, you've totally misunderstood the concept of irreducible complexity with regard to the origin of life and how it (irreducible complexity) fits with arguments against evolution. Evolutionists claim a step-by-step random process to create say a kidney. The function of the kidney itself shows that there are too many inter-related parts that have to be present simultaneously for it to be an actual working organ - hence irreducible complexity - you either have all of the parts in the right order at the right time doing the right thing or you have just one big mess. That's one of the reasons why there's no human replacement for the kidney - not even a way to fix an existing broken one. There's an almost magical way in which the kidney functions! Yes, you read that correctly - it's almost magical in its complexity. We can go on with a lot of other things too, e.g. the eye, the nose and the tongue, not to say anything about photosynthesis or the brain. You can carry on believing the evolutionary fairy tale or you can drop down into reality.

@LumbridgeTeleport

2 ай бұрын

Oh goodness. I see you had to edit your comment. Nobody said anything about being considered human it’s about life and death. Yeah don’t develope a brain and guess what you won’t live. Or a heart or lungs. It’s that simple. Sorry you ignore facy

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

No, because many of the organs you mentioned are redundant not an absolute necessity, which is what the argument from irreducible complexity is all about.

I find what is really fascinating is not what evolutionists believe but why they believe it. Eventually it comes down to taking God's creatures that can adapt to their environment and extrapolating new family and genus species. It boils down to Faith on their part just as much.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

NO it does not. Science is based on evidence. Evolution is supported by testable evidence; it has been observed in nature and duplicated in the laboratory. Your belief and religion is based on myths and has no evidence.

@samburns3329

2 ай бұрын

_I find what is really fascinating is not what evolutionists believe but why they believe it._ We *accept* , not believe, evolutionary theory because of the huge quality and quantity of its consilient scientific evidence. You feel free to keep believing in supernatural magic. We'll try not to laugh too loudly. 😊

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

When you have thousands and thousands of pieces of evidence, you don't need faith. Your statement shows you do not understand what actual evidence is.

@KenJackson_US

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852: _"... you do not understand what actual evidence is."_ Please tell us, Nathan. I thought this video was loaded with evidence, though greatly simplified for a non-science audience.

@aceventura5398

2 ай бұрын

@@samburns3329 Science is a religion to the masses. They don't involve themselves in the experiments. They instead believe what PROVIDERS OF INFORMATION tell them. So they believe without proof. They place their faith in PROVIDERS OF INFORMATION. They trust in man, not science. Religion.

Great information! Thank you. However, somewhat ruined by annoying background music.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

Not only the music is annoying, but the entire video is incredibly annoying by the ignorance and the outright lies it contains.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

@@maylingng4107 "Not only the music is annoying, but the entire video is incredibly annoying by the ignorance and the outright lies it contains." - Then you realized you have really nothing to support your claim and ran away.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

@@jounisuninen Why would I run away? The entire science of biology supports my claim. The video is a complete fabrication of pseudo-science by Calvin, who neve got past high school. Let me see of you can defend that the earth is 6,000 years old (it is what Calvin claims)?

Such a great GOD, who is the mastermind behind creation!

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

Deluded and uneducated humans are the only ones behind your god

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

All hail Zeus.

Evolutionists do not hate this video, except in sense that they may hate the ignorance displayed about the actual theory of evolution and the false assumptions about "anticipation" which not scientific, but a religious belief. This is a religous strawman argument at best.

@ikemiracle4841

2 ай бұрын

It's always about the labelling with you guys, there's no straw manning here. If you take randomness literally at the DNA level it's quite impossible to generate such sophisticated design. All other arguments aside, if you just consider the mathematics of probability calculations you'll immediately see how damaged the theory of evolution is. Look I'm not making this up just think about it, any random event with a 1/10^⁹⁰ probable outcomes cannot have a reasonable result because there won't be enough time in the universe for it to happen, this applies even when you Infuse evolutionary theory because at the base level evolution would have to search this vast sea of outcomes in order to generate even the simplest life form. It's not a God of the gaps argument it's an argument from the abundant knowledge of what we already know and established in the universe.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

@markthompson14 "the ignorance displayed about the actual theory of evolution" - The problem is of course that evolutionists themselves no longer know what is the actual theory of evolution 😂 Karl Popper’s principle of falsification is generally accepted as the method proving a theory scientific or non scientific. If a theory can’t be falsified by any thinkable method the theory is not scientific. The so-called evolution ("All life on earth stem from a Universal Common Ancestor") is like an ever changing octopus. When science proves that mutations produce decay not evolution, Darwinists give evolution new definitions like: ”Nobody has claimed that evolution always means positive change” while Darwin's book ”Origin of Species” claims the opposite! Neo-Darwinian loosely determined evolution explains even the contradictory phenomena like fossils and missing fossils both ”proving evolution”, positive and negative changes both ”proving evolution”, genetically devolving subspecies ”proving evolution”, so-called living fossils "proving evolution" etc. Darwinists tell us that evolution is slow and gradual but it can also be quick and advance by saltations. It causes mind blowing changes or keeps everything static for millions of years. Evolution is random and without direction, except when it advances towards a goal. Acquired qualities can not be inherited except when they get inherited ... Anything works to prove "evolution" - just buy it! When any change is good enough to be shown as "evolution", how can you prove it wrong? That’s why the evolution theory can’t be considered a scientific theory - or be taken seriously at all.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@jounisuninen Yes, scientific ideas are update when new information is found. It would be stupid not to do that. Origin does not claim what you say, read it. Even if it did, Origin is not the end all be all, like I said, when new info is discovered, science adjusts to it. There is more than enough physical evidence to support evolution as a theory even if Darwin never existed. In fact, there is more physical evidence supporting evolution that probably any other scientific idea. There is no such thing as a Darwinists. Ya'll can't fathom NOT having someone to worship, can you? It is kind of sad, really. You can't find meaning with a deity. What species is devolving? That is nonsense, like most of your arguments. Is that how you try to explain away the tail you grew in utero before it was reabsorbed and repurposed? Don't worry, that doesn't make you unique, quiet the opposite, because it happened to all of us. Some humans are pretty unique in that they are born with that tail though. Mutation are random, and most of the time neutral, but the environment oftne determines whether the mutation is beneficial or not. You really don't study much science, do you? It is ok if that is not your strong suit, and it is ok if you are not that interested in it. But don't try to dismiss mountains of evidence without providing a whole bunch of evidence of your own.

@SBluesBrotherhood

Ай бұрын

Why is there absolutely ZERO pieces of hard evidence for evolution in any museum anywhere in the world? The only thing that people can point to is pencil sketches and watercolor paintings of "the tree of life" or "the ascent of man". Every time that someone claims to find "the missing link" it turns out to be a scam (and even those are ONE bone, ONE tooth, etc....)

Rejection of Jesus is not intellectual. It's a heart thing: I DON'T want Jesus because I don't want to follow his teachings, I don't want to be "told" what to do, I am ashamed of what others will think. Hence, I want to be my own God.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

You have no idea what non believers are thinking. Your projection just shows what kind of person you really are. People like you, and nonsense like what I hear from Calvin are reasons I haven't believed in a god since childhood.

@Moist._Robot

2 ай бұрын

Nonsense.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

Projection, again, from Christians who are supposed to love everyone. This is a big part of the reason, along with the inability to answer simple scientific questions, as to why I stopped attending church when I was old enough that my parents could no longer force me too.

@punkrackszcz

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 your reply to my comment makes absolutely no sense: I did not manifest hate, anger or rejecttion. DNA is a super complex STRUCTURES CODING system which answers scientifically that a super mind is behind life (God) because no natural process can code a 'hello World' program

@razark9

2 ай бұрын

OR, follow me on this OR it's just people who aren't convinced by your fairytales? Nothing to do with not being told what to do, being one's own god or embarrasment.

Before any evolutionists call him out, know he doesn’t pick his video titles…

@mcmanustony

26 күн бұрын

So what. He's responsible for the pseudoscientific drivel he presents.

Oh Snrps! I learned a lot 😅

When you ask them those questions, they will tell you "I don't know", a cop out, but still go on to tell you their response is the correct one and advances in science will find out eventually. Um, nope. This is a classic chicken and egg problem where the code cannot be built up to multiple layers of this sort of complexity randomly, especially when you consider all the rest of the complex components required to even make this code useful at all, also randomly occurring all by themselves to somehow function in unison with the code. Stinks of direction and purpose in unguided natural forces if you ask me.

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

Religion proves evolution. Religion reverts to type and is an evolutionary dead end. BTW the egg came first.

@jdshl8423

2 ай бұрын

@@rf7477 , the "egg" came first? Where did the egg come from with all that genetic information to hatch into a living creature? And what laid it and hatched it? ROFL? Are you sure you understand the concept of the phrase "chicken and "egg" problem? the correct answer would actually be the "chicken", but you would still get hit with the same questions like with the "egg" in reverse, but the creationist avoids that pitfall entirely, incredulous as it may sound. By the way, when you say "Religion proves evolution. Religion reverts to type and is an evolutionary dead end.", it is a prime example of circular reasoning. It's as circular as when a Bible believer says the Bible is true because the Bible itself says so.

@richardgregory3684

2 ай бұрын

Evolution isn;t random.

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

@@jdshl8423 Your use of the "chicken and egg" phrase was a classic creationist red herring. There are very ancient dinosaur egg fossils, some with fully formed embryonic contents. Your effort to conflate evolutionary biology with the primitive superstitions of creation betray your own limited understanding.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

The egg came first. It developed several million years before the chicken.

In the beginning was the DNA Code (Word) and the code synthesised into protein (Flesh).

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

Bahahaha! Are you serious? Way to extrapolate and stretch your “word” to fit reality.

@ayokiervah5006

2 ай бұрын

All matter is a vibration.. Sceptics, agnostics and atheists must prove that Sound is not a vibration..

Amazing!

I don't what none of that science stuff means but Amen...only God the all-knowing could create something like that

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

This is probably the most honest comment I've seen made by a creationist.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

@@HangrySaturn Haha, exactly! They never bother understanding anything beyond what their favourite apologists tell them!

@NoahOD_22

2 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440Y’all love to call creationists dumb, but you never provide an actual case against Creation. Nor do you provide a case for evolution. You simply scoff. It’s almost like you don’t bother understanding anything beyond what your favorite pop-atheist tells you!

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

@@NoahOD_22 Oh, please. I would be delighted to disprove the myth of Creation. Firstly, it is impossible for the Earth to exist before the Sun, as a planet requires the gravitational pull of its star in order to be formed in the first place. That's why the Sun is 4.6 billion years old, while the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Secondly, green plants could not have formed before the Sun or aquatic organisms, because not only do green plants require sunlight for photosynthesis, but they also evolved from aquatic plants hundreds of millions of years ago. Lastly, flying animals could not have existed before terrestrial ones. We know that all flying animals had to evolve flight, which means that their ancestors had to be terrestrial. All of this is demonstrated by cosmology and evolutionary biology. I don’t need to listen to another atheist to understand why creationism is pseudoscientific.

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

@@NoahOD_22 Buddy, the myth of Creation is obviously false. Do you really think that the Earth could have existed before the Sun? How do you think it could have stayed in place? On the other hand, evolution is a demonstrated fact. I don't need another atheist to explain that to me.

The watchmaker argument 😂

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

Yes, again, and again, and again... and his followers eat it up.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

HAHA I purposely called the series Rewinding Paley's Watch to show that evos shrugging off the design/watchmaker's argument is completely illegitimate for very specific reasons which I demonstrate. And here we have someone shrugging off the argument with no rebuttal... genius... : )

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 The rebuttals are all over this page, and many, many other pages...

@mattbrook-lee7732

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 you have never demonstrated anything ever. What on earth are you talking about. How about having a live debate with someone who actually understands thos stuff.

@sliglusamelius8578

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 Tell me the sequence odds of getting a 150 amino acid length proteins by chance alone. Then look up single point mutations and human disease. Look up how proteins are spliced and folded by enzymes, and how cells control which proteins are made and in what amounts. You literally have no chemistry explanation for how such control programs and mechanisms would arise de novo.

10:56 with simple rules, of course!

And this is how 'Levi was yet in the loins of Abraham (his great grandfather) when he paid tithes unto Melchizedek'...

If I want facts about DNA, the last place to consider is AIG. It would be like getting a baker to pilot the next aircraft you fly in.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

And yet zero rebuttal against the information presented about DNA... : )

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 I'm not a geneticist and I don't need to be, clearly my point was entirely lost on you but that's not surprising.

Odd, then, that theists are always one step behind science by using new discoveries as an indicator that god is even more clever than we originally thought. Once, just once, perhaps a theist could put forward a novel White Paper based on the biblical 'facts' containing new scientific knowledge of benefit to humanity.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

The Bible says God created kinds of creatures to reproduce according to their kinds. That's all we've ever observed...

@dulls8475

2 ай бұрын

The majority of Nobel prize winners in science are Christians.....

@crystalyzzed

2 ай бұрын

Actually what is happening is that most DNA discoveries do not make it to the general population. DNA replication and protein synthesis is only explaine at this detail in universities where the marxists indoctrination don't let any posibility to think of the idea of a Creator. The rest of the population is left with "big think" ideas subsidised by your favorite billionares and authoritarians. One step behind? Af far as I see atheists are left with more explanations for their proposed origin of life.

@danielslagle6440

2 ай бұрын

Why? So you could argue with that as well? The Bible said that life was in the blood long before science said so. Also, the diet that was for the jews turns out to be for good reason. Part per part there are 200 more units or bacteria in pork than a fresh cow patty. Shellfish, I for one can die from shellfish. Washing of hands before eating, cross contamination with blood, different things called unclean has finally become accepted and practiced today. Even in the early 1900's doctors wouldn't wash the blood off their hands before going to another patient. Those few facts won't change your mind and what you want to believe at all but there they are.

@mattl3023

2 ай бұрын

Theists and theism itself have driven technological innovation. Read, for example, "21 Great Scientists Who Believed the Bible" by Ann Lamont. There are names there like Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, Sammual Morse, Michael Faraday, Louis Pasteur, Carl Linanaes, James Joule, Wernher Von Braun etc.etc. These were all theists and their work is the bedrock of modern science. You are quite wrong. Completely wrong. Please, come back with something intelligent in your next comment.

This is 3:51 a decent start to semiotics.

*As Time Marches On* As time marches on, science makes discoveries, breakthroughs in physics, chemistry, biology and all the other sciences. While the breakthroughs are generally the products of the educated and the thinkers ("scientists"), the general population lags a bit behind in understanding/adopting the new found knowledge, but in time most do come along, and we as a people take a collective step forward. Still, this step forward is not universal. In each period of our history a group of people do not keep up with the pace. For one reason or another, they are unable to deal with the modern world, and they huddle behind their special walls of ignorance trying to protect their "sacred beliefs" and curse the new knowledge even in the face of the clearest evidence. (Throughout history, there were 'and still are' flat-earthers, geocentric advocates, young earth creationists, fundamentalists, science deniers, etc.). While these throw-back groups diminish in numbers over time, some of the remnants stay around and yell louder and louder to stave off being swept away by the wheels of progress.

There's no such thing as an ''evolutionist''. There are people who understand and/or accept the overwhelming global consensus made up of scientists across all religions and lack thereof and then there are flat earthers and creationists.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for your algorithmic contribution Mr. Evolutionist : )

@sciencerules2825

2 ай бұрын

There's no such thing as an honest creationist.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

@@sciencerules2825 And thanks for your algorithmic contribution as well Mr. Evolutionist : )

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Evolution is a FACT and a scientific theory. There is not a single science organization in the world that rejects evolution. There is not a single piece of evidence from anyone that refutes evolution. Creation myths? --- well there are a lot of those, every religion has a different one.

@razark9

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 No such luck. The algorithm doesn't promote pseudoscience. So I can comment without contributing to your propaganda. :)

Who created the creator ?

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

He farted himself into existence.

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@Who_IsLike_God Proof?

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@Who_IsLike_God I'll ask again. Proof? Stop using questions marks instead of full stop. It makes you look illiterate as well as simple.

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@Who_IsLike_God That has to be the weakest fallacy of false analogy I've ever seen. You've provided no proof whatsoever, would you like to try again? I'm very calm, that is apart from laughing out loud at your nonsense.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@Who_IsLike_Godenergy is eternal. I understand the concept is beyond the scope of your brain….. As such no god proved or needed

My My, The production quality of this video is insane, it's a masterpiece!

@annieoaktree6774

2 ай бұрын

Pity the content quality sucks out loud.

@ikemiracle4841

2 ай бұрын

@@annieoaktree6774 then you must be watching at 240p or less, please do you self a favor and bring that up a bit

@annieoaktree6774

2 ай бұрын

@@ikemiracle4841 Playing it at 10,000p won't make the horrible science-free content be any better.

@avgejoeschmoe2027

2 ай бұрын

@@annieoaktree6774 ahhhhh, yur head up yur arse syndrome. Refusing to pull it out and open your eyes. Genomics is destroying the evolution fairy tale

@annieoaktree6774

2 ай бұрын

@@avgejoeschmoe2027 Lying makes baby Jesus cry. Quit making baby Jesus cry.

You are only referring all-day biochemistry, know since decades.

I'm just here to read stupid comments thinking there is a creator 😂

@sliglusamelius8578

2 ай бұрын

So you can't explain any scientific materialistic explanation for the chemistry discussed here, and how it arose, nobody can, so you insult because you don't know any biochemistry.

@luish1498

2 ай бұрын

@@sliglusamelius8578 people can't explain why it rains. therefore god makes rain. therefore Tialoc is the only explanation.

@sliglusamelius8578

2 ай бұрын

@@luish1498 We know how it rains. And we know how dna and proteins work. You can't get a single biological protein to form ab initio based on sequence odds of amino acids alone.

@luish1498

2 ай бұрын

@@sliglusamelius8578 «We know how it rains.» because we have natural explanations for that. in the past we use supernatural explanation for events that we dont understand. Proteins are assembled from amino acids using information encoded in genes. Each protein has its own unique amino acid sequence that is specified by the nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding this protein.

@beerboots

2 ай бұрын

@@sliglusamelius8578 So let's just invoke a 'god of the gaps' fallacy to explain things we haven't figured out yet? Nice, real wise. In that case, let's just scrap science altogether. Your god of the gaps already tells us that the answer is... wait for it... magic!

What are "evolutionists" and why would they hate a video that doesn't even try to refute biological evolution?

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

Exactly. I’m not gonna hold my breath for any real answers

@thomaswayneward

2 ай бұрын

Congrats, you comment fits in the non scientific world of all Darwin evolutionists.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaswaynewardoof right away you showed you don’t understand or think it’s okay to misrepresent (lie)

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaswayneward Lol, the only unscientific belief here is yours.

@sliglusamelius8578

2 ай бұрын

Abiogenesis is very much a part of the creation myth paradigm that people who believe in the phylogenetic tree of life promote. Abiogenesis is nonsense.

11:02 not its not, its just really confusing.

But they have obstacles to overcome - as in their life committed to their profession of naturalizm and like minds; 2ndly acknowledging the Creator would bring implications to seek Him. Pray Holy Spirit Conviction will set them free.

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

One could say the exact same about you believers

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

@@Bomtombadi1 "One could say the exact same about you believers" - Not really. There is difference. Logically thinking people prefer believing in something that is NOT scientifically proven fiction (God) than believing in something that IS scientifically proven fiction (evolution i.e. abiogenesis and universal common ancestor).

"So here is all the stuff actual scientist's have figured out. Since they haven't yet found ALL the answers... Imma just gonna say it's God..." Wow, what a brilliant deduction... Thumbs down.

@avgejoeschmoe2027

2 ай бұрын

ohhhhh, you dont like THAT possibility of a Superior Creator........that's YOUR problem

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

"Since they haven't yet found ALL the answers..." - All answers? Atheistic science has NO answers concerning the beginning of life and source of biological information. There neither are no signs that they would ever find those answers. "Imma just gonna say it's God..." - Creationists have massive evidence for God while atheists have no evidence for abiogenesis, universal common ancestor or self-creating biological information.

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

@@jounisuninen The show your single best piece of evidence so we can slap you with it.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@jounisuninen You have zero evidence for god except a 2,000 yr old book that history does not corroborate.

@gregoryt8792

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852there are many sources, including hostile, that say otherwise. The Bible has been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

Anyone who says evolution is nothing but pure random chance doesn't understand evolution and should learn more about it before they can criticize it. Random mutations will give you mostly cancer and genetic disorders and a few adaptations. Natural selection, the thing creationists ignore, makes sure that only adaptations get to move on.

@spamm0145

2 ай бұрын

You have way too much faith in matter without a mind, all life is incredibly complex with specified information that far exceeds mankind's, the ecosystems myriad of symbiosis relationships required immense levels of foresight and the absolute need for them to exist at the same time. Evolution has paradoxes that science and natural processes will never ever explain. You will accept that a street signs specified purposeful information necessitates an intelligent agent but dream that the mindbogglingly complex specified purposeful information within all living organisms did not.

@HangrySaturn

2 ай бұрын

@@spamm0145

@richardgregory3684

2 ай бұрын

@@spamm0145 _ all life is incredibly complex with specified information that far exceeds mankind's, the ecosystems myriad of symbiosis relationships required immense levels of foresight and the absolute need for them to exist at the same time_ Uhh...no. Extrteme complexity can arise from a small numer of simple rules iterated many times. Symbiotic relatinships co-develop over time. They specialised from mutual advantage to the point where they can;t exist without each other _now_ but this was not always true. Flowers and vees have a symbiotic relationship. But plants can pollinate without bees, and insects can exist without feeding on flower nectar and pollen.

@jockyoung4491

2 ай бұрын

@@spamm0145 A street sign doesn't reproduce, so it can't evolve. Duh. Do you really not even understand what evolution is?

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Mutations are supposed to drive evolution. Mutations are random...

Is there some kind of DNA to create the universe ?

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

Physics created the universe.

why is there thymine in your supposed RNA molecule? and why do you keep referring to the mRNA as DNA?

@mcmanustony

26 күн бұрын

It's almost as if they haven't a fucking clue....

So...all you are stating in 13 minutes is the watchmaker argument? If that´s your great discovery, no wonder you believe in some god...Sad how people want to reinforce their belief in this stuff without even realizing the fallacy.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

HAHA I purposely called the series Rewinding Paley's Watch to show that evos shrugging off the design/watchmaker's argument is completely illegitimate for very specific reasons which I demonstrate. And here we have someone shrugging off the argument with the hand waving claim it's a fallacy... : )

@erikgruber9736

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Oh that's great, I am sure you won't mind to dumb it down a little for us, because at first glance the conclusion of your video just seemed too simple-minded and like nothing new concerning religious fallacies; but perhaps we are wrong and there is truly some logical reason or revolutionary finding you have uncovered and some of us haven't quite grasped...I mean, I suppose the goal of your video is to convince those who haven't seen the light, not those who already believe and don't question it anyways. I am really intrigued to get what you are trying to demonstrate, which I don't quite get. You have to understand that not everyone is as illuminated and gifted as you are and have to be more patient with those around you, but I am sure your argumentative skills will allow you to help us decipher in two or three sentences what you are trying to explain.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

@@erikgruber9736 A 'no mind' process cannot create systems that require foresight. : )

@sciencerules2825

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Evolution doesn't require foresight.

@erikgruber9736

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 The thing is that for that assertion to work, you first have to prove that it is a system, not a result. And most importantly, you would have to prove that it requires foresight, not just stating it. Of course a circular argument always works (If we were to read your response with synonyms, it would state: ``A process that requires foresight (from a mind) cannot create systems that require foresight (from a mind). Indeed.

Reading the comments here, I feel as if I've been transported back to the Middle Ages. There are no gods, outside of mythology.

@misterpaper2572

2 ай бұрын

So is the video nonsensical or not?

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@richardharris8538. You wouldn't call your single -celled predecessors god? They certainly had god-like qualities! First, they were eternal or they just somehow, conveniently willed themselves into existence. Then they must have made the universe pop into existence so that they could have a place to evolve. And gravity? Yeah, they must have made that so as to keep them from floating into space. Andddd ... that primordial soup ___they made that! Oxygen? Yeah, they created that! They had no brain... but they realized that they had to evolve toward becoming human eventually? So, yeah, you believe in gods. Those convenient , single -celled predecessors!

@richardharris8538

2 ай бұрын

@@misterpaper2572From Wikipedia: "Irreducible complexity (IC) is the argument that certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts were removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional. This negative argument is then complemented by the claim that the only alternative explanation is a "purposeful arrangement of parts" inferring design by an intelligent agent. Irreducible complexity has become central to the creationist concept of intelligent design (ID), but the concept of irreducible complexity has been rejected by the scientific community, which regards intelligent design as pseudoscience. Irreducible complexity and specified complexity, are the two main arguments used by intelligent-design proponents to support their version of the theological argument from design." So to answer your question, it is nonsensical, and is an example of the fallacy known as the argument from incredulity.

@gregoryt8792

2 ай бұрын

In 1910 Ivan Panin, a Russian/ American Harvard math genius and linguistic expert, proved the Bible mathematically. Watch - Math proves the Bible. Most recently a 30 year veteran cold case criminologist J. Warner Wallace proved the Bible forensically in his book, Person of Interest. His testimony would convince any jury of the veracity of the Bible. Some of the amazing things in the Bible include the prophecy of the fall of Tyre and the prophecy of Alexander the great. Bible firsts include knowing life being in the blood long before modern science, or the Bible knowing about mountains and currents in the oceans or how the earth hangs on nothing. You should know about the prophecies fulfilled by Jesus and the impossible odds of that happening. The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eye witnesses during the lifetime of other eye witnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place in fulfillment of specific prophecies and claim that the writings are divine rather than human in origin. The Bible has also been proven archaeologically, historically and linguistically. 2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

I can recall reflecting on the evolution story I was being taught in school. With no teaching on creation and an atheistic version of cultural christianity in my home growing up, I could not escape the conclusion that there was a mind behind the living creatures and plants I observed. I would have gladly accepted there was no creator and did so for a few years, but I could never escape the evidence I saw in creation.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

feel free to believe in god, evolution is exhaustively verified

@FluffyBunnyJ

Ай бұрын

I can recall standing in a field and seeing the evidence that I was standing still on a flat surface. They tried to teach me that the earth is spinning and moving through space, but i instinctively knew we are standing still on a flat earth. I looked up and saw a ball of light that was much smaller than my fist, spinning around this flat earth I stand on. They tried to tell me the sun is bigger than the earth, but obviously they are lying. I truly hope this is not convincing to people. But this is exactly the logic you just put forward. Evidence, and good or strong evidence at that, should be required for forming your worldviews and beliefs.

@JesusSavesRepent

Ай бұрын

@@AMC2283no it’s not, evolution is a myth.

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@JesusSavesRepent perfect screen name. You can’t handle the idea of no afterlife from being just another evolved organism, that’s your only real objection.

@byteme9718

Ай бұрын

I suggest you find a grown up to teach you what "evidence" is. What you're experiencing is incredulity, you might want to ask them what that means too.

how to get this out of schools?

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

evolution is out of religious schools since they're about teaching make believe

This video is simply using a version of the argument from ignorance. I.e., the argument is: if we don't know how spliceosomes have evolved, then they must be the creation of the God of the Bible. This really adds nothing to the debate.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

"This really adds nothing to the debate." - You are wrong. It's logical thinking that is used here. Since there is no naturalistic explanation for life emerging from non-life or evolution with a credible mechanism, only logical theory is ID. Any logically thinking person prefers believing in something that is NOT scientifically proven fiction (God) than believing in something that IS scientifically proven fiction (abiogenesis and universal common ancestor aka evolution).

@TenMinuteTrips

2 ай бұрын

@@jounisuninenSo what you’re saying is that wherever there are gaps in our knowledge and understanding, the most logical conclusion is to assume an unfalsifiable placeholder and then say, “Therefore, God?” It seems to me that the most logical conclusion to life’s unanswered questions is to admit to not knowing the answers. That’s what drives the pursuit of knowledge.

@petermiles5714

2 ай бұрын

This is not an argument from ignorance but from what we DO know. Complex and ordered things do not form except by intelligent intervention. This is obvious in everyday experience. So it is patently obvious that biological entities and mechanisms such as spliceosomes could not arise by random stepwise means.

@user-rb3tk5th2i

Ай бұрын

actually its based on what we do know, and pretty much macroevolution is an outdated 19th century racist british theory

@user-rb3tk5th2i

Ай бұрын

@@TenMinuteTrips there are some things that humans commonly know worldwide (like god created life and universe) theres no logical reason to reject it as even "logic" itself implies god exists since its immaterial

Bacteria -- as relatively simple live forms -- doesn't do splicing. And as life form getting more complex, splicing is evolved (after billion years of trial and error) and gradual gain of survival advantages. So, Voila! It doesn't necessarily need a mastermind to design splicing mechanism.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Got it. I don't know how it happened so evodidit! : )

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Calvin "knows" how it happened, and everything! goditit!. That's how religion works. Mystery must be explained (and amplified, or reduced) by the divine. And he did it all in 6000 years.

@holyck14967

2 ай бұрын

​@@calvinsmith7575 There are more than one legit biological explanation to the evolution of splicing. Though I wonder if you are willing to read long paragraphs about those.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

@@rf7477 Internet rando "knows" how it happened, and everything! Evoditit!. That's how the story of evolution works. Mystery must be explained (and amplified, or reduced) by the material. And it did it all in 4.5 billion years.

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

@@holyck14967 There is also good evidence for ancient DNA. Svante Paabo found that Neanderthal crossed with Homo sapiens about 70,000 years ago. Your creation nonsense can be dismissed.

Amen

Amen! Jesus is LORD! Holy is His Name!

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

All hail Odin!

Why couldn't evolution do this? It seems obvious, we're made of carbon which has a great ability at forming new compounds, it's why there's so much variability in life. The DNA and RNA question is also quite simple because evolution just goes with what works, once these systems evolved they kept going getting more complicated. All of this has proven and observed in labs and in nature.. or you can just believe "God did it" and stop learning about the important stuff I guess.

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@user-hf1tv1fl2o. "It seems obvious that we are made of carbon," you declared! It seems equally as obvious that you give no thought to where carbon could have come from! Ohh, just handily existed for evolution's sake! The first single -celled predecessors? Ohh, just handily existed! The universe? Oh , just handily existed! Guy, that ain't science. It's comedy.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@user-zu2zo8ji4n No, carbon didn't just handily exists. No one claims that. After the universe started to cool down hydrogen and helium started coming together into heavier elements.

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 Oh,so the Big Bang handily created the universe and when the universe started to cool down... yeah, okay my friend. You are divagating way off into faith now. I don't believe you really know that! Don't you know what supposedly anteceded the Big Bang? The Singularity. Now that is the ultimate faith. Science is left far behind.

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@@nathancook2852 After the universe started to cool down? You obviously belief in the multiverse theory, the Big Bang or something equally untenable. With any of those theories, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A LOT OF FAITH. The reason is this: science is naturalistic. But either of the mentioned options defy naturality. Claiming the universe made it itself, conveniently just happened or possesses eternality is faith, not science!

Natural selection is not random. It’s a logical process.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Naturl selection is not creative. According to the story of evolution it requires random mutations to create new genetic information for novel forms functions and features. This has never been observed however. But in the end the story of evolution is ultimately a random force in concept.

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

"Natural selection is not random. It’s a logical process." - Not true. Speciation by 'natural selection' (in fact natural elimination!) can't generate evolution. It generates devolution. Natural elimination COULD produce evolution if it COULD deliver to the survivors such qualitatively new genes that are not already found in the population. Natural elimination however delivers nothing, it just destroys individuals who have less suitable genes for the environment where they live. The winners must go on with the genes they have. In the long run they can copulate only with other winners (the less fit are dead, taking their genes with them, or become too rare) which means that on population level the gene pool gets specialized i.e. impoverished. This is adaptation, not evolution. It is good for a while, but the specialized genomes make a more one-sided gene pool than the gene pool of the original population. When the living conditions change again, the highly specialized population suffers and goes extinct. This fact makes impossible for any subspecies to create the path that would lead to new taxonomic genera or new taxonomic families i.e. to evolution. No wonder over 90% of all species have already gone extinct.

We will Not!

11:51 it doesnt. This happens at random, (although it is effected by some stuff)

I'm an evolutionist, and I don't hate this video. Try again.

@chrisphillips2401

2 ай бұрын

Did you that Darwin and other evolutionist founders were freemasons. Freemasonry is based on satanism. You should research the roots of what you believe. Children believe in Santa, the concept of Santa makes sense to them and the fact that an adult is telling them about it solidifies their belief in it and they do not know any better. Darwinism is the adult, you are the kid and evolutuon is Santa. It doesn't matter if it makes sense to you, you do not know any better.

@chrisphillips2401

2 ай бұрын

I guess its just a "coincidence" that these people try to sell us evolution while simultaneously using satanic symbols and imagery in everything they do. They know the truth about this world but they do not want you and I to know, that is what they are betting on. I beg you to do honest research, you will be thankful and it will open your eyes.

@nathancook2852

2 ай бұрын

@@chrisphillips2401 Your first two statements are incorrect. But even if they were true, it doesn't discount the mountains of evidence that supports evolution. I stopped reading after two inaccuracies.

I can't explain it therefore God. Same thought process has been used for volcanic explosions, lightning, eclipses, and meteors.

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Nope- forethought requires a mind. Explaining what we do know, not what we don't : )

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠@@calvinsmith7575shouldn’t you be in church today?

@cavediver8385

2 ай бұрын

Very intellectually-dishonest analogies. Those phenomena don’t involve the same level of “information system within a system” complexity. If you were a STEM professional who actually engaged in software coding at the graduate level you would understand this.

@Bomtombadi1

2 ай бұрын

@@cavediver8385 those aren’t analogies. Those are the thought processes people attributed to these phenomena. You likening dna to a code doesn’t make dna a literal code. You being a STEM professional doesn’t qualify you to declare these complex systems in biology can’t occur naturally.

@iriemon1796

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Nope what? What we don't know does not imply God.

Gold. Praise God

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

so what could you have possibly needed this video for?

@ShadowQuik

Ай бұрын

@@AMC2283 i found it interesting

@AMC2283

Ай бұрын

@@ShadowQuikthere’s nothing supernatural about dna

@byteme9718

Ай бұрын

All hail Zeus.

I have often wondered if programmers could believe and evolution realizing that DNA and code share so much in common, specifically error correction, compression and algorithms involved in reading DNA.

@globalcoupledances

2 ай бұрын

No, DNA is more like Morse Code. No algorithms, error correction, nor compression

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

@@globalcoupledances "DNA is more like Morse Code. No algorithms, error correction, nor compression" - Wrong. Google DNA repair. Google A compression method for DNA. Google DNA algorithm.

@globalcoupledances

2 ай бұрын

@jounisuninen - Not error correction, it is repair, but goes wrong in 50% of cases. 98% of non coding DNA is not compression

@byteme9718

2 ай бұрын

Slaps forehead.

This is a masterpiece of logic and reason that utterly destroys the beliefs of evolution. Speaking as a former atheist/evolutionist, it takes vastly more faith to believe that "un-intelligent design" created algorithms to assemble our bodies than the "intelligent design" of our loving God. Fantastic video - clearly explained - THANK YOU for making this!

@rf7477

2 ай бұрын

There are two main reasons why the "christian" god does not exist: 1. It would be amoral. 2. Its religion is ugly beyond belief. Attributing anything to the obviously man-made contrivance of "christianity" utterly destroys creation.

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

Sorry you don’t understand what a scientific theory is and how this didn’t destroy anything.

@thomaswayneward

2 ай бұрын

un-intelligent design, that's good.

@thomaswayneward

2 ай бұрын

scientific theory? darwinian evolution is full of them but the problem is not one of them has been proved by a scientific proven fact.@@therick363

@therick363

2 ай бұрын

@@thomaswaynewardare you saying evolution isn’t a scientific theory?

Wow, you people are embarrassingly gullible. Religious, go figure..

@user-zu2zo8ji4n

2 ай бұрын

@FactStorm. Gullible? Atheists/evolutionists : " The supernatural is ridiculous. I believe in the multiverse theory or the Big Bang... And our single -celled predecessors ____they evolved,so they simply appeared; they must have ". Man, that is some serious comedy! And to top it off ___ it's supernatural!

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Evolutionists? Ya, I know right?

@FactStorm

2 ай бұрын

@@user-zu2zo8ji4n Thank you for proving my point, I didn't even have to lift a finger. You are oblivious..

@FactStorm

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 Get an education, kid. I bet you're American..that would explain your ignorance.

@VincentMigwi-jy7oi

2 ай бұрын

😮😂😂😂😂😂

at a certain point one has to accept the idea that this issue will not be solved.....so believe in one, or the other, but, as for me, I take creation as the source....

@thedubwhisperer2157

2 ай бұрын

You truly believe that a 2000 year-old book trumps centuries of the finest minds ever known? How did you come to that conclusion, given what science has done for mankind, and the reason I am able to read and reply to your comment?

@jounisuninen

2 ай бұрын

​@@thedubwhisperer2157 "You truly believe that a 2000 year-old book trumps centuries of the finest minds ever known? " - Obviously @philipbuckley759 as myself and innumerable other logically thinking people prefer believing in something that is NOT scientifically proven fiction (God) than believing in something that IS scientifically proven fiction (abiogenesis and evolution from a universal common ancestor). "How did you come to that conclusion, given what science has done for mankind, and the reason I am able to read and reply to your comment?" - What has the ability to read and reply to do with evolution theory? Thank God that you've had the chance to learn reading and writing! What comes to centuries of the finest minds ever known ... Yes, we know most of them by name! The most important founders of modern science believed in God: Nicolaus Copernicus (a monk), Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, Michael Faraday, Joseph Priestley, James Clerk Maxwell, Gregor Mendel (the founder of genetics and abbot of a monastery), Lord Kelvin and Albert Einstein. Plus, many of the pioneers of quantum physics: Werner Heisenberg, Max Plank, Erwin Schrödinger, James Jeans, Louis de Broglie, Wolfgang Pauli and Arthur Eddington. And today's scientists - the astrophysicist Paul Davies, Simon Conway Morris (Professor of Evolutionary Paleobiology at Cambridge), Alasdair Coles (Professor of Neuro-immunology at Cambridge), John Polkinghorne (who was Professor of Mathematical Physics at Cambridge), Russell Stannard, Freeman Dyson … and Francis Collins, who led the team of 2,400 international scientists on the Human Genome Project and was an atheist until the age of 27, when he became a Christian. Natural sciences started to decline only after Charles Darwin presented his evolution theory in 1859, without understanding anything of genetics or thermodynamics or biological information. Today's evolutionists are just as ignorant.

Where is part 1?

@calvinsmith7575

2 ай бұрын

Posted 3 weeks ago on this channel. Title- Even TOP Evolutionists Won’t Deny This Evidence for God

@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

2 ай бұрын

@@calvinsmith7575 None of what you post explains any evidence for God. On the contrary, evolution still happens to be a fact.

I wouldn’t say hate, laugh is the appropriate response.

@robschaller9061

2 ай бұрын

Yes, laughing at the unbridled STUPIDITY that evolution is the answer!

No, we don't. Because it's unsupported nonsense.

@ddevriesd4

Ай бұрын

Good rebuttal. The facts and details you brought forward are very convincing.

@TheBunzinator

Ай бұрын

@@ddevriesd4I Have neither the time nor inclination to provide rebuttal to such trash. There is no point trying to convince dogmatic folks who are essentially unconvincible.