Hi, Scandinavian sociology student here! I just want to add something to what you discussed about Scandinavia and gender equality laws/policies and the culture :-) While it is true that Scandinavia might have more gender equality laws/policies than most other countries, there are still some issues regarding this, e.g. only men have compulsory military service (at least in Denmark). Furthermore, the gender equality laws/policies actually make it very difficult to discuss the cultural issues with gender equality in Denmark. Some conservative politicians even argue that there is no such thing as gender inequality in Denmark BECAUSE we have these laws. They do not acknowledge the cultural issues that lead to gender inequality. In this way, I feel like the US and other countries actually are better at discussing these issues. When #metoo was discussed internationally some years ago, many people (not just conservatives) laughed about this in Denmark. Luckily, we now have a second and much more succesful discussion about #metoo in Denmark at the moment. Some public figures (such as the mayor of Copenhagen) even have been forced to resign after women this time around had the bravery to speak up about sexual assault. My point is, gender inequality is not just about laws and policies but also culture (which you also argued). Scandinavia might seem very gender equal on the paper, but there are some serious cultural issues that we have a hard time discussing and changing. That being said, it is a big privilege to live in a country with such laws. I love your content ❤️

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

So it’s like the egalitarian policies have minimised the differences in some ways but have served to magnify differences in other ways?

@lindamadsen1400

3 жыл бұрын

​@@iFkNxLegend I am not sure if it has served to magnify the differences, but it kind of 'hides' the cultural/social issues. The egalitarian policies are used as an excuse for not discussing gender inequality, because someone always can say that Denmark (and the other Scandinavian countries) are very equal countries because we have those policies. But we do have issues with sexism in the workplace, different social 'rules' for men and women, women taking more care of the home and children than men do etc. This is of course also true for many other countries, but these issues are difficult to discuss in Scandinavia because some politicians (and others) do not acknowledge them as gender inequality issues because we 'officially'/judicial have gender equality. Hope that makes sense?

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

@@lindamadsen1400 ok I was just trying to make sure I understood your point. Thank you for clarifying

@lindamadsen1400

3 жыл бұрын

Just to clarify, I think Scandinavia is a rather gender equal place compared to many other countries, but I just wanted to say that gender equality is much more than laws and policies. Regarding laws and policies, Scandinavia has come a long way and is better than most countries. But when it comes to cultural and social issues regarding gender equality, I think Scandinavia has many of the same issues as most other countries have - but these issues are just not always recognized in the Scandinavian societies.

@lindamadsen1400

3 жыл бұрын

@@iFkNxLegend Thank you for taking your time to read it :-)

The "You're not like other girls" thing is a turnoff for me even if the guy has a reason for saying it. It just proves that he does not see women as three dimensional characters who all have something unique and beautiful. I'd actually LOVE to be like other girls cause a lot of them are A M A Z I N G

@msgirly6827

3 жыл бұрын

Yep

@lampad4549

3 жыл бұрын

See that just seems like toxic behaviour on your part, your taking something that is inherently meant to be a compliment and assuming the worst intent and background behind it plus your projecting the motive as well. It could just mean that he likes you more than any other girl hes been with or he resonates with you more that's it. Maybe the other girls hes been with might have been very abusive towards him you sure want to be like them.

@hbee6466

3 жыл бұрын

@@lampad4549 Thanks for your reply and invitation to think about my words more. I think it's more nuanced than I stated in my first message. Of course I would ask a guy why he's saying it, and if he would tell me previous girlfriends have been abusive to him I wouldn't judge him. But this specific line is, in my experience, often followed by "they're all so basic and you're special" or something along those lines. If he really believes ALL other women are basic, it's a red flag.

@scottlukacovic4600

2 жыл бұрын

That statement pretty much screams "I'm sexist!!!" Big giant red flag

@ethan-scott

2 жыл бұрын

Double standard. Do you view men “as three dimensional characters who all have something unique and beautiful”? Nah, didn’t think so.

Your videos are like a refreshing breath of air after being trapped inside all day

A LOT of my girl friends relate to the post nut clarity video lmao! Matter of fact we didn't even know men felt like this.

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

REALLY!?!?! i had no idea!

Please react to "Is she into you?" By Casually Explained

@lyblabs2456

3 жыл бұрын

PLEASE

@godlee6099

3 жыл бұрын

Yes PLEASE do this

@jayskiv4125

3 жыл бұрын

Great idea

@estrelladml5882

3 жыл бұрын

YES

@DeadPointDelusions

3 жыл бұрын

That shiz is funny

my bf once said to me "you want to know how i know i really love you?.... because i still want you after i get off".... such a charmer

I enjoyed this so much, you make such good points!

So happy to see you are still going strong, and getting more subs. You deserve it so much Anthony! xox

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

❤️

just when i thought i couldn’t love your content more! everything you said in this video was perfect

Person with a sexuality degree here: The peacock analogy was one of the worst things I've ever heard. But Jordan Peteson isn't wrong, a study came out recently that looked at this globally-but like a basic principle of research is that you can't paint with a broad brush and draw conclusions from one study. Also, gender roles are changing constantly so men and women are constantly changing, there is no "way to be a man or woman".

@Vincisomething

3 жыл бұрын

As someone with a bio degree, the peacock analogy was trash. And according to his logic, he wouldn't be selected lmao. What does he have to offer on top of misogyny and thinking his 8th grade definition of "eVolUtiOn" explains everything.

@Simplenotion

3 жыл бұрын

also he basically denied that women are able to rape men...which happens more often then we all think it does.

@ashlye.o

3 жыл бұрын

yes, besides other animals should never be compared in terms of sex with humans, they have literaly other nature, imagine saying a cat that thay shoul fuck just for pleasure as we do. You can take avery animal to comparasitioin and put warever arument, eagles for loyaly, or these peacock traying to make a diference in male and female.

@cabbastyles.

3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@katrin6388

3 жыл бұрын

havent seen that part yet, but the thing about peacocks and other male birds with captivating features, just proves that the idea that males are visual creatures and females are auditory creatures, is false

Great arguments Anthony, you're always inspiring!! ✨✨

Anthony Drivers license by Olivia Rodrigo is blowing up and all of a sudden I care about the chemistry behind her and her ex Joshua Bassett. could you do a part two to that video with more videos where they were interacting

Loved this vid. Eye opening

Have you done Bachelor/Bachelorette reactions? I know a lot of people do them but I would be curious to see what you have to say (specifically Clare and Dale).

@thegardener3650

3 жыл бұрын

Omg! Yes! I agree.

@rachelleblanc8788

3 жыл бұрын

YES

@wildhopeXx

3 жыл бұрын

Yess plssss

your tiktok at the end is the DEFINITION of vine energy

Great video. 'ppreciate ya, bro!

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

🙏🏻

“You’re not like the other girls”. If it’s a compliment, then you’re insulting females as a whole and saying how much better you are than other females. That’s insulting your entire sex. Girls, women, your friends, females. If they’re saying it as an insult to you...then well of course it’s offensive. Just don’t say it

@danielkolesnick9417

2 жыл бұрын

Cry about it

you're amazing, thank you.

Great commentary on Peterson. He said it like his study was an absolute. Good points there are to many other variables not considered.

Wow. Your content is so different and knowledgeable.

Yes! A haircut can make or break it for a lot of girls, I know boys that are so sweet but the mullet really throws all the nice girls off

Whenever I hear a boy say “I don’t even really like her” post 🥜 makes me never want to talk to another guy ever again.

@bestbeast6368

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome to the actual world. Without that trait I strongly doubt we would've become almost 8 billion people roaming this earth.

React to the Drivers License drama with olivia rodrigo and joshua basset

You didn't understand what JP was saying or not the totality of what he is saying in the whole interview. He says that studies shows that if you make the society more equal (equality of opportunities) you can see that more women will go to some fields (like nursing) and that more men will go to other things (like engineering). The thing to look at is not only the numbers but their evolution through time.

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I know what he's saying.

@sarius363

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I even thing Anthony is right at the point that you can’t have an total neutral society. But I think still J P has the right point that in this cultural way they tried to be the most neutral and less “sexist” and still could not determine the big differences between men and women.

@mronyxhd4201

3 жыл бұрын

@@sarius363 Well he doesnt just say that they are hard to determine he is saying that they are bigger than anyone expected

@richardstark857

3 жыл бұрын

Its impossible to get the full context of what he’s talking about from a short clip and easy to misinterpret either way

@Ayoutubeaccount3

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnthonyRecenello in the study he's referring to you'll see the arab countries have the highest amount of women working in STEM fields, arguably the most sexist countries in the planet where women still can't drive at about 40%, on this argument where you see in the more egalitarian countries that they encourage women to work in STEM fields and provide scholarships for them e.g finland belgium norway sweden swtzerland ireland are all about 20%, I'm from the UK and study computer science, 90% male dominated in my university, I looked at the data and women who applied were more likely to get in, yet so few applied in comparison to men, we will never reach 50% workforce distribution because men and women tend to have different preferences, whats important is we have a society that caters for the minority and doesn't discriminate against them for it which you could argue is already happening in the aforementioned countries

Iconic changed my life man

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

Luv ya

I would love to see you analyze Garett Watts ❤

Hahahah " I thank ....me "

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

lol

I think the difference between how you and Dr Peterson are looking at the argument is one of experience vs data. You talk about the people that you have met and how you found that women can embody masculine traits and men can embody feminine traits but you have said in other videos that the way you meet people is by going near people you find interesting so you have that selection bias. Dr Peterson is just talking about data where random samples of populations have been taken so that selection bias isn’t a factor if the samples were truly random. When you look at that data it shows that men tend to embody certain traits more often, women tend to embody certain traits more often and that the differences in the embodiment of these traits are magnified in countries where egalitarian policies are more common. These studies don’t say that all men are one way and that all women are the other way and of course there are outliers within the data but when you view that data on a macro level there are strong general trends. These studies have been done all over the world but Dr Peterson comments on Scandinavia because those countries stand out as the most egalitarian and the most different between men and women. I don’t think Dr Peterson is saying that egalitarian policies are bad just that if the desired outcome is for men and women to be truly equal (I couldn’t think of a better way to phrase that) then the data is showing that egalitarian policies are not the way to achieve that. I think you both make excellent points and ultimately the difference between your argument and Dr Peterson’s argument stems from the fields you both occupy. Dr Peterson comes from a data science field where conclusions are drawn from general trends in data. You come from a very human field where the focus is much more on the individuals. I think it’s important to get general trends from large datasets but there are real people at the core of this and so we cannot lose sight of the individuals. If anyone actually took the time to read all of this then I’m impressed. I didn’t intend to this comment to get as long as it did. It’s still not complete but I can’t be bothered continuing it.

@robin6728

3 жыл бұрын

Read through the entire comment. Couldn’t have put those points into better words if I had tried.

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

@@robin6728 thanks for taking the time to read it :)

@wp4872

3 жыл бұрын

I read this all the way and you’re 100% correct.

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

@@wp4872 thank you of reading it. I think ultimately both men want to help people and different parts of what they try to teach will resonate with different people

@PilotHardy

3 жыл бұрын

I agree that Dr Peterson’s argument is scientifically based but his field is clinical psychology. You can’t get more “human” than that ;)

Love this 🙌🏽

Attacking the bald guy because he is not good looking? Talk about bias "Dont debate these people, just debate with people with no bias" 🤦🏻‍♂️🤡🤣 And who is shutting down free speach? "These people want to shut you up" Projection much?

As someone who rolls my eyes when I hear people complain about "SJW's" and stuff, 17:19 brought a totally new perspective to me. Often times, people complain about how "this generation is too fragile" but never consider that such people might just be pretending to be sensitive. Now I see how multidimensional "offense" can be. Awesome video!

19:12 Basically explaining the term «simp»

you should have your own podcast :)

What JP is saying is egalitarian policies make women and men relatively more different than non-egaliterian policies. Relatively is the operating word.

Anthony, a bit random here but would you be interested in reacting to callux’s latest video with Lauren Alexis, don’t know if it’s worth it but there dynamic is interesting, especially since Lauren has rejected him and how well he handled it could be a good talking point,. Nonetheless keep up the quality vids my dude 👍❤️

@kiram.3619

3 жыл бұрын

that sounds interesting.

He is tries to argue against JP point, that just because a countries law are egalitarian doesn’t necessarily mean it’s culture is. While this is logically true, a countries laws are more or less aligned with the cultural values of that country, so egalitarian western nations laws are based on cultural values. On a side note the aforementioned point only applies to actual democracies. In totalitarian govs the laws may be in complete apposition to the general culture. Even though in those cases it is almost never the case that the culture is less egalitarian and the totalitarian gov makes makes the policies more so, it is almost always the case that the culture is more and the totalitarian gov makes it less so. So JP point stands, as countries are more egalitarian with policy and indirectly with culture the maximization of the biological difference between men a women are actualized. Never does JP mention anything about gender roles affecting who you end up with. He was dismissive of the study JP draws from, but then goes on to use anecdotal evidence to if not outright dismiss, belittle the scientific evidence in the avg difference between men and women. Lastly, JP has stated countless of times men and women are way more alike then different. JP goes on to point a lot of the difference on the extreme ends of the scales. So men and women share on avg similar levels of aggression with men being slightly higher. But when you look at the 1% of the most aggressive people across time and culture almost all are men. This is an inherent difference. Not culturally dependent.

we need a braddison part 3 anthony pls 🥲

Dude I don't know what you are trying to do but 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Dude ur experience alone does not disprove a study with tens of thousands of other individual experiences, Peterson isn't saying women are suppose to act this way or another, what he is saying is most men and women act a certain way, he is stating what already exist in the world, he is not saying an individual, whether men or women should be forced into gender roles. He is saying 'most' men and women will choose to follow their respective gender roles.

@Overseer2579

2 жыл бұрын

where's the study you speak of?

@denischungkham6779

2 жыл бұрын

@@Overseer2579 Google any credible website about psychology on that topic

@Overseer2579

2 жыл бұрын

@@denischungkham6779 Why don't you just link me a credible recent survey or piece of research to prove your point? I'm open to seeing such proof and getting another take, but I won't just take someone at their word

I think Peterson was just trying to point out that the government can make policies to force equality, and it can still fail. It can be because of the personality differences, different preferences, or even because of traditions.

JP has done research. Scientific ones.

@lincabe321

3 жыл бұрын

Many of JPs statements have been debunked including this one.

@thewarriorwithin4011

2 жыл бұрын

@@lincabe321 do you have links?

Thanks for calling out some of these sexists!!

I love your videos bro but JBP was talking about the contradictory bias in a swath of rigorous studies conjured by people with a bias towards gender equality. This bias is why a lot of studies have been trying to point to a logical conclusion in which we want to realize (through human empathy and sentiment towards unequal distribution, as I too share this sentiment) that socially advanced civilizations cultivate a rich, equalized environment for the genders. The crazy part is that everyone, especially the scientists who carried out the studies, were blown away when the data revealed the exact opposite of the proposed "equalized" hypothesis, the divide between genders actually widened as civilizations advanced. Pretty wild, I know this was a snapshot of a an interview so definitely out of context but I recommend you look into Jordan B. Peterson. Great guy with a great family, and he's basically the Canadian rendition of kermit the frog which is a huge plus! XD Love what you do, keep up the hard work!!! 😊

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

Anthony has pretty strong opinions about Jordan Peterson but they seem to be entirely based on these out of context clips and seems to have lumped Jordan Peterson in with the red pill and migtow movements. This is strange because it really seems to go against what Anthony try’s to teach us in his other videos

@darkvader37

3 жыл бұрын

Damn JP still relevant these days he has good self help stuff but could never take him too serious after whole post modern Marxist thing that was a big flop on his part imo

@dorothytran2926

3 жыл бұрын

@@iFkNxLegend not just Anthony but a lot of people associate JBP with the extremist right and MGTOW when his interviews demonstrate that he’s completely against those groups. JBP’s interviews are thought provoking and I think he gets put into this box of the “dangerous right” just because he has thoughts that challenge beliefs widely accepted in universities and on the mainstream news.

@ellanelson4746

3 жыл бұрын

@@dorothytran2926 so true. He’s one of the most mis-contextualized people out there

I can’t wait to tell this guy of mine that it’s none of his business !

15:20 best explanation of objectification I have ever heard! I think I actually get it now

How can I subscribe twice??!

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

❤️❤️❤️❤️

Hello and do you watch abc the bachelor and what do you think of this season and last season

Talks about how Jordan Peterson is wrong about the differences between men and women, and that he doesn’t see a difference between them... Then proceeds to talk about differences between men in women for the rest of the video😂😂😂

About Peterson, for what you’re saying to be correct it would have to be that NOTHING which has been done in Scandinavia was the correct way of adressing gender differences. You’d think even if they did a crap job of it they might have made some equalizing change but Peterson’s point is that’s not what the evidence is showing (I haven’t looked at the research personally). I agree with how you treat women equally, but what’s wrong with recognising men & women might naturally differ sometimes in what they want out of life? p.s. I love your videos, really want this channel to grow

@dorothytran2926

3 жыл бұрын

Loved your point on how men and women should be treated equally despite being different in nature. Women have the ability to give birth and to lactate to feed their children-an impossible task for men biologically; yet, we should still provide education to both with equal opportunity to rise in the ranks because as human beings, men and women have inherent value. It’s unfortunate Peterson gets mislabeled as a sexist so often for believing in something quite reasonable in my opinion. He’s never once said women have to be stay at home moms or men have to be paid more than women. He’s simply pointing out that a biological difference exists and can contribute to different motivations, but at the end of the day we are able to choose what we do with our lives.

Jordan Peterson is talking about differences of choice related to gender when it comes to choosing a career or a job. He is not talking about dating.

Literally for 2 years I would kiss my best friend (who was a girl and I'm a girl) almost everyday... we never really talked about it and I was fine with it. We were too young to overthink about it or want to make it anything besides what it was. It was the best relationship and the best 2 years of my life I've had so far 😊😂

I think I would rather believe Jordan Peterson who is a real physiological professor then a KZreadr so called dating coach mate.

3:45 ok but we're not peacocks lmao. Also, there are species of animals that are polyandrous (single female, multiple males) so that guy's "scientific fact" is heavily biased and he's just a misogynist. It's not like I have a bio degree or anything but you can also look this up in 0.5 seconds.

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

Exxxxxxxactly

@Vincisomething

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnthonyRecenello It's so great when sexists/racists/homophobes think their misunderstanding of 8th grade biology automatically makes them right lol.

@gerardo9052

2 жыл бұрын

Thats what women want Múltiple men to supply múltiple needs And men get none Yeah, right

You might be mis representing Peterson's argument. He would agree with you there are other variables, not only that he has also said that there are males and females who not follow the traditional pattern. What he is saying is that since it is more egalitarian you would expect the differences to reduce instead of increase than in other countries in the world. But you ser the opposite the more freedom women and men have the more difference you see in their choices.

Could you please react to Heidi Klum and Tom Kaulitz? I find it so interesting that she is older than him for almost 18 years.

What was d intro

You should react to charisma on commands video on Jordan peterson

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

does he love jp?

@DeadPointDelusions

3 жыл бұрын

Anthony Recenello yeah he seems to like him haha

Please react to Courtmien (Courtney and Damien from Smosh)

$60 haircut looks like a $120 haircut when you get to $160 and up the haircut is still the same but there’s an open bar.

I love your work and wondered if you can make videos on the other side " women redpill" ...

How can he be so right about Bieber and so wrong about Jordan Peterson and Darwinian evolution? 🤦🏽‍♀️😂😂

@AnthonyRecenello

2 жыл бұрын

And why are you sure JP is right?

@sibzism

2 жыл бұрын

@@AnthonyRecenello I thought long and hard about whether or not to respond to this because I'm hoping it's a genuine question and not something that will end up in a meme on social media please 🙏🏾😊 First, I didn't say JP is right... I said you're wrong about him 😊 Youre wrong when you say that "so much of what he talks about is based on showing that women are one way and men are another way" - he actually talks about a lot of other things for one, and for two he's been very clear that where there are differences... those differences are at the extreme end of the personality spectrum (mostly men and women are similar in many ways). - he's said that multiple times 😊 On a separate note, your hypothesis that if we had a society that was completely shut off from any socially constructed gender norms and we watched them grow over millennia we'd be able to determine if we'd replicate the results from Scandinavia...(Something like that)...is interesting! But aren't you literally describing history? There was a time when these were the exact conditions and what emerged was an agreeable female and a dominant male. Its only in very recent human history that we've started to be ashamed of this somewhat. I write this to question your views on Darwinian evolution (because I said I thought you were wrong about that too). 😊 p.s. I enjoy your content btw, I'm new to your channel and I think you've got some interesting perspectives 😊 and you keep it light which is nice 👍🏾

Dear Anthony, I came across your videos. Glad I did. You have a fresh and truthful perspective on some topics of dating but like many other experts on KZread there is some falsehood which I wish KZreadrs would be humble enough to own up to. 1) To distant current human beings from evolutionary pressures is false. To attack a guy on his looks and not stick to the argument made is false. 2) Yes redpill can be toxic but there is clearly truth in the matter. One clear and blatant example, “there are hundreds if not thousand of women waiting for drake(or celebrity men) after his concert versus women after shakira concert. And I dont remember any societal pressures currently influencing such phenomenon. This is literally an individual women subconscious act. So the question is why? I am gonna stop there other than that your content has been pretty good. Thank you for the video.

Studies aren't made in the way you think. To figure out how a factor influences the outcome you just have to look at enough examples where you only change that one factor and see how the results change. In the study Jordan Peterson references they only gave more equal opportunity to men and women and saw that the majority of them got their stereotypical jobs. The fact that the culture might be sexist is irrelevant because it stayed the same, so the difference in outcome wasn't a result of it. Also if there is a cultural pressure for men and women to act in a certain way and it's not because of their preferences shouldn't they divert from those behaviours when the pressure lessens? Yet when they made it more possible for women to chose what they want, they chose more social jobs. I mean he is a professor. How could you just assume that he'd lack so little nuance to account for these things. Even when people are biased (which JP is as self aware and unbiased as they come) it doesn't mean that they would always sabotage all morals and responsibilities to prove their biases right. A lot of people value truth more and they try to be aware and account for their biases as much as possible to reach it. Don't just discredit a legitimate persons opinions by labeling them as bias

@lyn1896

3 жыл бұрын

Actually, it could still be culture. Culture cannot be ruled out as a big or part factor. If you give people more possibilities, for example with pay for different kinds of jobs being quite equal and good enough to live happily on, this can increase the cultural pressure to go into the stereotypical workplaces. It doesn't necessarily have to be biological. That said, I think most of the criticism he has gotten is the linkages he does from the "increased personality difference findings" to other studies about how these personality traits influence for example where we work. Here he can be criticized of cherry picking and too much focus on one aspect, which absolutely could be part of a bias (which we all have). Also the same when it comes to the linkages to public policy.

@mikelitorous5570

3 жыл бұрын

@@lyn1896 He chose the Scandinavian cultures as an example. They are one of the most liberal, if not most liberal societies on earth.

@lyn1896

3 жыл бұрын

@@mikelitorous5570 Yes. I am just saying that there is not a scientific fundament to say, based on this, that it have to be biological or fully biological. That's not to say I rule it out. I'm just saying the argument hasn't done what it claims it does (to rule out cultural factor and isolate the biological effect.)

@katrin6388

3 жыл бұрын

thats actually true. ive noticed, many of thee hobbies i have are very havely male dominated. i dont mind. but its just curious imo. take drawing or martial arts for example. i actually expected to see more women in those classes, but turns out there were onçy men there

@nomas9993

3 жыл бұрын

Cry now, you just have to look up the things he says to find out he is biased. Also the fact that he is a professor doesn't mean what he says is completely true😂😂

16:18 this is Twitter IRL

On Nordic argument Should not the freedom to choose be most important. Quotas mean someone loses the freedom to choose. That was the other side of the argument.

Don’t argue with anyone with a bias? Really? If no one had bias, there would be nothing to say. Debate is how minds are changed and universal truths are found.

14:00 what? I'll tell you women knows what that means too

@MissLeonable

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely

I think it’s funny how he was talking about how men and women are equal then later says only men know this😂

@happywings15

3 жыл бұрын

equal doesn't mean the same right. a pound of feathers and a pound of stones, equate to each other not the same

@garrettwilliams2688

3 жыл бұрын

@@happywings15 i was just saying I think it’s funny

What’s a law that is different for men and women in this country?

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

I don’t know your country but a classic example is the difference between maternity and paternity leave when a child is born

@dilemma1275

3 жыл бұрын

which country are you from?

@martialartsislife2066

3 жыл бұрын

@@iFkNxLegend that’s not a law. I’m from the US where a women can do anything. At least that’s the way I was raised.

MGTOW and Red Pill rage misogynists like the bald dude are my favorites. They just reach and project ridiculous "science" to compensate for the compulsive need to blame. Their artificial value constructs are completely flawed and biased by their own lenses of perception. They refuse to accept this reality because they don't want to accept the fact that the reason nobody loves them is that they are constantly miserable. This is coming from someone who has had one relationship in their teen years but has otherwise been single his entire life. If I had a different mindset, I could be the mascot of a movement like this. Instead, though, I really just don't care, choose not to be miserable, and am a male only really interested in dating someone if we both mutually think it has the potential to actually go somewhere. Sexual attraction is a factor but contrary to society's belief, does not drive every decision I make as a man. I'll definitely own that this used to depress me when I was younger, but eventually I figured out you can still live a fulfilled life and have women involved in your life without receiving frequent sex from them. It's almost like there are way more important things in life than sex or something. Crazy, I know.

CAN YOU DO LARRY STYLINSON PART 2, pleaseee? 🥺

That mating thing according to evolution doesn't take into account recreational sex, it goes on about procreational sex. And women with exceptions ofcourse select the best mate they can.

He called dr Jordan Peterson “this guy” lol.

@aideenmoroney1571

3 жыл бұрын

That's all the bitch is is some guy

Kissing in Europe is pretty normal. It’s the US that is still behind...

The secont tiktok is a half of true. Evolution has this rules, men are pushed to be strong, healthy and good looking than they can be picked by many women (males try to sleep with as many as possible) and give to next generation theirs genes as much as possible. However females have to invest much more energy into the next generation (give a birth) than they can sleep with many males as well(theirs body is trying to find the best males genes for theirs descendants). But this evolution principle envolves the animals. Humans have anothers different aspects as polite, respect, ethics, psychology...So this is only half true. Recomending you Selfish gene theory written by Dawkins accredited by almost all scientist over the word. Sometimes evolution can explain our behaviour but there are many others reasons which we have to admit. Otherwise we can behave badly because of theoryes and ignore polite habits.

@8:00-12.30 what you're basically saying is fuck stats, I'll just trust my intuition. Pretty toxic male way to think :) Just a hint: maybe don't argue with psychology professor about his/her expertise if u have only "real world" knowledge. If u'd had gone to collage or taken any kind of stats class you'd know that one of the main reasons for making statistics are so that you don't have to trust your (biased) intuition.

Please react to Chase and Charli's relationship "Charli does my makeup" on Chase Hudson's yt channel

Ehm, also women have these “after orgasm” thoughts, if we are referring to the same thing of course 🤣 the “🤢 why did I like that?” Or “I am so disgusting”

You're so smart Anthony

Lol, you commenting on JP. Keep trying, he’s on a different level then you’ll ever be.

There's no such thing as "zero effect" my friend. Its either sonething has a micro or macro affect. But never a zero effect

Dude bringing up evolution could also bring up species where females mate with as many males as possible. The species I'm thinking of all being mammals so are much closer to us than peacocks. Then there are bonobos who are our closest living relatives where females are in charge and solve all their problems with fucking. Anyway all those species are nonhuman so they don't really have a bearing on human social interaction which is more complicated than pretty much every other species on Earth and social structures can vary wildly between cultures. Women sleeping around is not universally seen as taboo. Men sleeping around is not universally seen as fine.

Who did you hang out with in your life where the chicks act like men and the men act like girls?

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

Jordan Peterson covers his bases

You‘re amazing. I can‘t believe how similar we think. You could be part of my family :D

It's not just a statement though the egalitarian policies in scandinavia is not equality of outcome it's equality of opportunity ...there is literally not a bias was the whole point of the policies in place in schools the things they are taught are gender neutral even in their society it's non existent gender bias it's just a fact that men and women as a whole excluding a small percentage prefer different things ..as long as they are treated fairly what's the problem with being different from eachother kind of the whole point opposites attract

15:48 gonna have to say that's cap😂 most guys at a bar wouldn't care if the girl likes them or not.. they'd just be glad to smash

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

You're still confused John. You're thinking about that situation in the current dynamic between men and women. If the entire situation was flipped-as in-men ALWAYS were the ones that were being hit on-and women didn't give a shit about the man whatsoever, you would begin to feel an abundance mindset in terms of getting meaningless sex-and your standards would raise to wanting GOOD sex from COOL women only.

@xjohntheone

3 жыл бұрын

@@AnthonyRecenello lol yeah I get what ur saying now. In the video I dont think you said the ENTIRE dynamic.. you just said "If men felt objectified when women did this, they would get turned off" to which I was like "Well no not really BC most men are just thinking about getting a quick nut anyway"😂😂. But yea thanks for the response

Actually the study Jordan Peterson talks about is proven to be wrong in many ways

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

Hey Daria! Can you link what you’ve found?

We need a part three of reacting to Braddison please Anthony deliver to us!!!!!!!!!!!

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

i will!

You should react to joe Biden smelling people

Anthony where’s ShawMila???could you make nick Jonas and Demi Lovato please ?

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

It’s coming!

@Emilyisawsome98

3 жыл бұрын

ShawMila and nick Jonas and Demi Lovato ??? The both of them? But I have A feeling you’re gonna do a poll before making anymore vids .

@AnthonyRecenello

3 жыл бұрын

@@Emilyisawsome98 shawmila is filmed

React to an episode of wife swap

Seems pretty pathetic that you said the guy at 4:20 (lol blaze it) looks unhappy off of no basis. More than likely he is happily married. Generally speaking the older gentleman that tell women to be discriminate are those who are trying to help a younger generation get where they are.

@lucasclupny6305

Жыл бұрын

@@Mukubesa04 I happen to agree with you but my comment was more to point out that he was resorting to character attacks rather than any actual rationale

Please react to Trisha paytas & her fiancé mosses relationship! Would be so interesting to hear what you think!

Wtf was that bald man going on about ?! Lmaooo

@MoriVin

3 жыл бұрын

🤣 A key that can open many locks is called a master key, but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a shitty lock…

@starheartskull15

3 жыл бұрын

@@MoriVin ok Neanderthal

@MoriVin

3 жыл бұрын

@@starheartskull15 😂just explained to you what that dude was going on about.

@starheartskull15

3 жыл бұрын

@@MoriVin oops my bad I thought you were agreeing w him

@ryanbarker3978

3 жыл бұрын

Nothing intelligent.

I was thinking the same thing on the J. Peterson one. He fails to take cluture, societal pressure, and social conditioning into consideration.

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

Except these studies haven’t just been done in Scandinavia. They’ve been done in many countries all over the world and the meta analysis from all of this data is that in general the more countries implement egalitarian policies the greater the divide between men and women becomes. The fact that the data comes from multiple countries and still shows the general trend indicates that it isn’t because of culture and society in Scandinavia. Dr Peterson only mentions Scandinavia because those countries stand out as being the most egalitarian and having the greatest differences between men and women.

@samuraiken88

3 жыл бұрын

@@iFkNxLegend Yes, he knows the literature very well. I do agree with JP on this.

@iFkNxLegend

3 жыл бұрын

@@samuraiken88 it’s hard to understand Dr Peterson’s point just from this clip. It needs more context. He wasn’t saying egalitarian policies are bad, just that people were pushing for equality of outcome and going by the data egalitarian policies were not having the intended effect. As the clip goes on he even says that maybe if policies were taken to the absolute extreme then the data may change but at the minute the data is showing the opposite of what was expected and that the difference is partly explained because of the biological differences between men and women

@samuraiken88

3 жыл бұрын

@@iFkNxLegend yee I watched the entire interview. He basically said when there egalitarianism in the laws, it's easier to see the differences in decisions made by males and females.

I think you miss understood what Jordan Peterson is saying. He doesn't say that all women prefer this and all men prefer that. He is saying when everything is equal most women will not become engineers and it is because women and men have different traits. And by saying different traits he doesn't mean there isn't a overlap of course there is. He talking about extremes just like prisons. There are more men in prisons then women because men are more aggresive then women but of course there are aggresive women. When you graph it most aggresive people are men and most agreeable people are women but this just happens at the end of the spectrum.

No one talk nothing about professor Jordan Peterson, he's the internet dad.

Hai. I just watched your reaction to Larry. If you think Larry is a friend, please make a reaction about Zarry (Harry and Zayn). Sometimes I think that Larry is real, but I see that Zarry is more real than Larry.