📌 Join the discussion! What's your take on dark matter? Do you think it's time to explore alternative models of the universe? Share your thoughts in the comments. Watch the full debate here: iai.tv/video/beyond-the-darkness?KZread&

@AnthonyZboralski

11 ай бұрын

Why did you truncate the video and try to force me to your terrible web site? I'll unsubscribe

the intstitute for arts and ideas charged me for months after confirming my cancellation has ignored my emails over and over again. I cancelled in august 2022 and it looks like theyre just gonna ignore me forever. they did respond once, and they confirmed that my account had been cancelled but they denied they were charging me. i immediately responded with a picture of my credit card statement proving that they were, and they continued ignoring me. it's unbelievable. not only have they not refunded me but I had to cancel my card because they wouldn't stop charging me every month. im just going to leave comments like this until they respond to me and refund me.

@drbuckley1

11 ай бұрын

That's a lousy experience. I enjoy the institute's content but feel like I'm getting pulled into est by Werner Erhard.

@whnvr

11 ай бұрын

that sucks! however as mentioned it would've made more sense to contact your card company itself if the issue was unresolved for multiple months. this is why i keep separate income and billing account. i only get billed for money i keep in the account, which means it never matters if am overcharged for an account! i currently have some twelve companies i no longer use desperately trying to get money from that account, and i remain unbothered/financially protected (whilst mildly amused by their efforts)

@Native_love

11 ай бұрын

Call your credit card company. There. Problem solved. You're welcome.

@shodan6401

10 ай бұрын

@cdg39526 Yeah. About what I'd expect from an organization that charges money for access to a debate about the general knowledge and understanding of our universe. Trying to remember how much Socrates charged to sit in on his discussions of our philosophical interpretations of life and knowledge? This pay-wall is not just unethical, it's repugnant and immoral.

@cdg39526

10 ай бұрын

@@shodan6401 i dont agree with that at all really. Its fine to charge… you just have to stop charging when someone cancels…

The General Theory, although it covers a _lot_ of what we have discovered so far in the universe, does not cope with how stars and galaxies are actually observed to move. That's it. _That_ is the sole reason that (because the General Theory could not possibly be wrong or incomplete) a story like "well, you see.......uh.... yeah, there's obviously a spooooky type if matter and a spooooky, mysterious type of energy making the General Theory predictions not match reality. Yeah. that's it. No, since you ask, no one has ever detected this matter or energy but it's definitely there. Oh and we need there to be a NINE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED PERCENT increase in the total matter in the universe." gets any credence. It _might_ be true. Or, it could be that there is no such stuff and.......audible gasp......the General Theory needs some work.

Glad to hear there are still pragmatic scientists doing serious research, its clear to be seen who are the ones looking for magic substances (laughing nervously, explanation very unconvincing).

@siraaron4462

9 ай бұрын

"but it explains gravitational lending so screw the scientific method"

@urtyp6596

9 ай бұрын

Pavel: 100 Karen: 0

@urtyp6596

9 ай бұрын

Also on viruses: Read the book Virus Mania! Virology is also Religion and not science! Cheers

@jimmy56100

9 ай бұрын

​@urtyp6596 Atleast she admitted you have to make a lot of assumptions

Thank you very much! A very important topic and an interesting discussion aimed at finding a way to overcome the conceptual - paradigmatic crisis of the metaphysical / ontological basis of fundamental science, which manifests itself as a "crisis of understanding" (J. Horgan "The End of Science", Kopeikin K.V. " Souls" of atoms and "atoms" of the soul : Wolfgang Ernst Pauli, Carl Gustav Jung and "three great problems of physics"), "crisis of interpretation and representation" (Romanovskaya T.B. "Modern physics and contemporary art - parallels of style" ) , "loss of certainty" (Kline M. "Mathematics: Loss of Certainty"), "trouble with physics" (Lee Smolin "The Trouble with Physics: The Rise of String Theory, the Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next"). Fundamental science "rested" in the understanding of space and matter (ontological structure), the nature of fundamental constants, the nature of the phenomena of time, information, consciousness. Quantum theory and general relativity are phenomenological (parametric, operationalist, "effective") theories without ontological justification (ontological basification). "Curved space" is a philosophically naive idea. To overcome the crisis, the Big Synthesis is needed, a critical look at the entire path of philosophy and science, new ontological and dialectical ideas. We must continue to "dig" deeper to the most remote semantically distinguishable depths of the existence of the Universe as an integral generative process. John Archibald Wheeler, "the unsung paragon of science", left a good philosophical testament to physicists and cosmologists: "We are no longer satisfied with insights only into particles, fields of force, into geometry, or even into time and space. Today we demand of physics some understanding of existence itself." To understand the EXISTENCE itself means to "grasp" (understand) the nature of the primordial TENSION of the Cosmos. A holistic paradigm, the "PARADIGM OF UNDERSTANDING", should come to the aid of the "paradigm of the part" that dominates science today. And for this it is necessary to "grasp" the primordial ontological structure of matter. That is, to build a model "being-nothing/other-being-becoming" To understand this means "to grasp the structure" (G. Gutner "Ontology of mathematical discourse"). The paradigm of the Universe as an eternal holistic generating process gives a new look at matter. MATTER is that from which all meanings, forms and structures are born. There are three and only three absolute forms of existence of matter (absolute states): absolute rest (linear state, absolute Continuum) + absolute motion (vortical, circular, absolute Discretuum) + absolute becoming (absolute wave, absolute Dis-Continuum). What is especially important: each absolute form of the existence of matter has its own ONTOLOGICAL PATH (bivector of the absolute state, "dao"). Accordingly, SPACE (absolute, ontological, existential) has three ontological dimensions and 9 gnoseological dimensions. But you still need to “dig” deeper into ontology in order to “grasp” the MetaNoumenon - ONTOLOGICAL (structural, cosmic) MEMORY, “soul of matter”, its measure. Ontological (structural, cosmic) memory is that "nothing" that holds, preserves, develops and directs matter (enteleschia, nous, Aristotelian mind, prime mover). Therefore, we must write not "space-time", but "SPACE-MATTER/MEMORY-TIME". John Archibald Wheeler: "To my mind there must be, at the bottom of it all, not an equation, but an utterly simple idea. And to me that idea, when we discover it, will be so compelling, so inevitable, that we will say to one another, 'Oh, how beautiful. How could it have been otherwise?'" A good testament to understanding matter as a holistic generating process was left by Albert Einstein: “I like to experience the universe as one harmonious whole. Every cell has life. Matter, too, has life; it is energy solidified." Today, the problem of the millennium №1 is the ontological justification / substantiation of mathematics (ontological basification), and therefore knowledge in general, the construction of the New Extended Ideality - the ontological basis of knowledge and cognition for the new information age: ontological framework, carcass, foundation. That is, the Big Ontological Revolution is needed in the foundations of knowledge. Physics must move from the stage "Phenomenological physics" to the stage "Ontological physics". John A. Wheeler: "Philosophy is too important to be left to philosophers." A.N. Whitehead: “A precise language must await a completed metaphysical knowledge.” P. Florensky: “We repeat: worldunderstanding is spaceunderstanding."

If there’s no evidence of it, it’s not a theory, it’s a hypothesis

it has always struck me that the Dark Matter hypothesis likely emerged for two entirely pragmatic reasons (1) because that was most apparent way that Einstein could be held uniformly correct across the universe and everybody knows that Einstein is correct, here , there, now, then & every where-when anyone ever chooses to postulate. The alternative would mean sooo many papers finding the bin. Not on. (2) it means new physical physics & that means more experiments more grants and more work, more papers and thus, more money for more work and more papers. Exciting.

@devalapar7878

11 ай бұрын

Mond doesn't disprove general relativity.

@aurelienyonrac

11 ай бұрын

I like dark matter as Bose einstin comdensat. And dark energy as : pinch and pull a stocking, that symbolize the gravity of a black hole. If you take the fabric you are holding as your frame of reference, then it looks like a misyerious force is pulling the fabric away from you. That illustrates dark energy. So we are in a black hole and from there the gravity of our parent univers looks like dark energy. Simple It also means that every black hole is also a univers. And that at plank scale this is what is happening , tiny baby univers. Empty space is like a row of infinit basket ball players sitting on an infinit row of chair. Is there room for one more player ? Yes. Player one hops to seat 2 . player 2 to seat 3... That wave of people getting up is quantum wave. That person added is the bending of space time. Like an "edge dislocation" in metal at atomic scale .

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

@@devalapar7878 It can't!

@devalapar7878

11 ай бұрын

@@ianw5024 I also see no way to disprove gr with mond. What Mond shows us is that there is something we get really wrong. If I had to guess, I would say it's because we don't have a QM description of gravity.

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

@@devalapar7878 Thing is, MOND fails at large scales, so it isn't really showing us anything. And quantum gravity will affect observation and theory at very small scales. It might tell us why relativity predicts singularities, which cannot exist. However, relativity works just fine at macro scales. That is why I really have no time for MOND. It was originally invented to do away with relativity and dark matter. The only surviving versions of it now require both to try (unsuccessfully, imo) to remain relevant. MOND is on its death bed.

Rather than coming up with a new, and questionable theory, should we not be reviewing the theories we have already accepted? For instance, Eddington's Standard Model is based on the idea of gaseous spheres gas, which now seems unlikely given recent discoveries about gasses in a liquid metallic state, could there not be much more mass in the stars that we have already accepted, than we now believe? Perhaps Zwicky's Missing Mass has been hiding in plain sight all along.

Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration. That we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively. There is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Here's Tom with the weather

@FunkyDexter

11 ай бұрын

Yesterday another young man on mushroom realized the same thing and talked to God, aka himself, and asked what is an electron. The answer was that it is all just the same, just ondulating in different configurations.

@icwiz

11 ай бұрын

Bill Hicks

Chanda-Day is wrong to state that the bending of light around dark matter has been observed, in that the bending has been observed, just not the dark matter it is supposedly bending around!

The contributions of Kroupa and Chadha-Day are fascinating. It's not clear why a philosopher should be involved in the discussion as neither astrophysics nor theoretical physics is his area of expertise. Questions concerning dark matter are certainly not going to be answered by looking back at the historical development of scientific/philosophical reflections on natural science.

@urtyp6596

9 ай бұрын

Pavel: 100 Hysterical woman: 0

Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. This is illustrated in a common 2 axis dilation graph with velocity on the horizontal line and dilation on the vertical. The graph shows the squared nature of the phenomenon, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. According to Einstein's math, the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the missing mass is dilated mass. According to Einstein's math, galaxies with very, very low mass would not have dilated mass because they do not have enough mass at the center to achieve relativistic velocities. To date, this has been confirmed with 5 very low mass galaxies, all showing no signs of dark matter, in other words they have predictable star rotation rates. This is virtual proof that dilation is the governing phenomenon in galactic centers, there can be no other realistic explanation for this fact.

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

Nobody thinks singularities can exist. They are a product of the maths of relativity. And that shows that we need something else at the smallest scales. Quantum gravity is the big hope. As it is, relativity explains everything perfectly well. And the Einstein paper you mention was trying to explain why he thought black holes wouldn't form. He was wrong. As Oppenheimer showed in the same year, and more recent evidence proves.

@shawns0762

11 ай бұрын

@@ianw5024 He was right, the recent discovery that very low mass galaxies have normal star rotation rates is proof. You believe in something that is based on a mathematical misconception, was popularized by television and movies in the 1960's and there is no evidence for. Relativity perfectly explains the phenomenon we see, wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur.

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

@@shawns0762 _"He was right, the recent discovery that very low mass galaxies have normal star rotation rates is proof."_ Nope, Einstein said nothing about dark matter. _"Relativity perfectly explains the phenomenon we see, wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass, dilation will occur."_ Get an education! WTF has dilation got to do with anything? Just name the peer-reviewed paper that explains whatever it is that you obviously can't.

@shawns0762

11 ай бұрын

@@ianw5024 Obviously he said nothing about dark matter, the term was not coined until many decades after he passed. He wrote about dilation occuring in regions that would have less mass than that which would exist at the center of common spiral galaxies, since high mass means high momentum, it's safe to say that according to Einstein's math the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. The same math could be used to calculate the surface velocity of the sun if you doubled it's mass. It's not a matter of opinion, the missing mass is dilated mass.

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

@@shawns0762 _"it's safe to say that according to Einstein's math the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated."_ Really? According to whom? Just give me the name of the peer-reviewed paper. How hard can it be?

In Astronomy they do not use General Relativity to calculate galaxy rotation and motion, they use Newtonian gravity. So is it surprising that reality does not match their calculations. There are 2nd order (and 3rd, 4th. etc.) of general relativity that has been posted showing that the effects of "dark matter" is actually "frame dragging" caused by the higher order parameters of GR.

@brothermine2292

11 ай бұрын

That seems wrong. Frame-dragging effects are expected where space is highly curved, such as near (spinning) black holes. Not out at the peripheries of galaxies where stars' orbits are faster than expected.

@devalapar7878

11 ай бұрын

No, frame dragging explains some of the discrepancies. It doesn't eliminate the need for dark matter. Mond's biggest problems are the CMB and the bullet cluster.

@JeffY-ri2nj

10 ай бұрын

Frame dragging is caused by momentum. There is a lot of angular momentum around a black hole, even a measurable amount around our own sun. But there is a lot of momentum in the arms of a spiral galaxy. The effects can also be felt by the linear momentum of the galaxy as well as it travels through the cosmic web. This is why I dislike the shortcut of using only Newtonian gravity in astronomy since it is a 1st order approximation only.

@brothermine2292

10 ай бұрын

@@JeffY-ri2nj : The frame dragging effect in General Relativity decreases with distance. Distances in galactic arms are huge, so frame dragging doesn't explain the higher-than-expected velocies of the stars in a galaxy. If it did provide the explanation, dark matter would not have been theorized.

So in cosmology a hypothesis that explains a handful of niche things is somehow more important than fitting observational data... Somehow being very large is an excuse to ignore the scientific method? I'm not buying it. If we have multiple observations falsifying LCDM at a confidence interval of 5 sigma than you can't just ignore that because LCDM might explain some other things.look for an alternative model that explains those things

Still preferred some type of modified lasage theory of gravity over cosmic vacuum, the basic particles are eddies in and endless sea of Energy, some eddies are more stable than others. Anyway that’s how the universe makes sense to me.👽

Very disappointed that I was cut off after about 15 minutes and directed to another website which required a subscription to hear the complete discussion.

The motion they've blamed on dark matter or missing mass is incorrect. They assume right off the bat that because stars and galaxies move too fast for the distance and mass of other bodies that mass is somehow missing from their equations. Because more mass is required to produce the higher unexpected velocities. Gravity is not the only force in nature able to move mass. We use energy to move mass here on Earth. We don't use gravity because we have no idea what's causing gravity. Sure, we can measure the motion of matter, how far it is from the barycenter of it's orbit and accurately predict the body's mass using it's velocity. So when they discover an object doesn't contain enough mass to be moving fast enough, the first thing they assume is there is missing mass. What if they're missing energy in their equations and not mass? When we include energy instead of missing mass the equations change, able to explain the unexpected motion and more. Like it explains why dark matter affects bodies differently and why it affects some bodies but not others. Plus, it even explains why satellite galaxies orbiting the Milky Way faster than a million miles per hour can't reach an escape velocity, something that a dark matter halo can't explain.

Honest question: is gravity and gravitation not the same thing?

@devalapar7878

11 ай бұрын

It is. But there is a slight difference. One is the specific and the other one is the general notion. I have idea which one is which.

15:37 It may not matter in anyway, but I noticed the video editor made a blured version, and then faded it in with the unblured one. Instead of slowly blurring the video.

@user_7239

10 ай бұрын

🍪here you go

_На 4:10 минуте видео и далее речь идет о предполагаемом влиянии «темной материи» на формирование и свойства галактических дисков. _ Наблюдавшаяся учеными странность - существенно увеличенная по сравнению с ожидаемой (расчетной) скорость вращения звезд в составе галактических дисков , - в некоторой степени обусловлена некорректными исходными посылками при вычислении указанной скорости вращения звезд в диске галактики по аналогии с вычислением скорости движения планет Солнечной системы вокруг Солнца. А именно в этом кроется диалектическая ошибка. Галактика является сложной с и с т е м о й со множеством взаимодействующих между собой по различным параметрам элементов - галактических объектов, в т.ч. звезд. Свойства сложной системы о т л и ч а ю т с я от свойств отдельных элементов той же системы. Так, например, характер вращения сырого яйца как системы (по внутреннему строению) отличается от характера вращения того же сваренного яйца, которое выступает в качестве единого элемента. В рассматриваемом нами случае, применявшееся учеными вычисление скорости вращения звезды в диске галактики по аналогии со скоростью вращения планеты в Солнечной системе, соответствует вычислению скорости движения, исходя из свойств отдельного элемента системы. При этом упускается из виду, что звезда, скорость движения которой вычисляется и измеряется, одновременно взаимодействует (в частности, гравитационными, магнитными силами) с остальными вещественными объектами галактики. Образно говоря, из-за указанного взаимодействия диск галактики приобретает некоторую связку, становится "жестче", и потому линейная скорость вращения отдаленных частей диска возрастает. Если представить себе, что диск галактики (со всеми его внутренностями) стал жестким, то имеющаяся вращательная энергия диска перераспределится так, что угловая скорость вращения жесткого диска станет меньше, при этом уменьшится и линейная скорость вращения ближней к центру вращения части диска, а линейная скорость дальних от центра вращения частей диска еще больше увеличится. И "темное" вещество, искомое учеными, при э т о м ни при чем. ... «Тёмная материя» существует, но в другом месте. [25.03.2024]

@spiridonnspiridonn4596

2 ай бұрын

Раз существуют зоны, в которых вещество, имеющее массу, трансформируется в «труху» (в энергетический вакуум), то должны существовать и зоны, где «труха» при некоторых условиях рекомбинирует до вещества с массой, например, водорода. С появлением вещества, имеющего массу, появляются соответствующие гравитационные силы, сгущающие образовавшийся водород до газовых облаков, затем до газовых планет, и далее по известной цепочке, замыкающей кругооборот материи в Природе. Одной из подобных зон может быть околосолнечная зона. [25.03.2024.]

@spiridonnspiridonn4596

2 ай бұрын

Имею дерзость интуитивно утверждать, что поскольку постоянная Планка связана с энергией (мощностью) излучения, а излучение происходит в пространство, заполненное энергетическим вакуумом, то уровень излучения будет зависеть в том числе и от *концентрации* энергетического вакуума, в который происходит излучение. Таким образом, постоянная Планка является постоянной на локальном уровне, а в межгалактических масштабах она является *переменной* . В соответствии с указанным свойством якобы «постоянной» Планка следует оценивать влияние изменений «постоянной» Планка на красное смещение, на разбегание галактик и на прочие космические чудеса. Очень может быть, что гравитационная постоянная тоже зависит от концентрации энергетического вакуума. [25.03.2024.]

@spiridonnspiridonn4596

2 ай бұрын

1. "Весло, погруженное в воду, кажется нам надломленным. Таким образом, важно не только то, что мы видим, но и как мы его видим." (Мишель Монтень, "Опыты" ). 2. «Кто ищет - вынужден блуждать.» (И. - В. Гёте «Фауст» ). [25.03.2024.]

@spiridonnspiridonn4596

2 ай бұрын

Чтобы меньше блуждать при исследовании и познании явлений, целесообразно использовать, в частности, системный подход. Об этом смотрим, например, книгу: Могилевский В.Д. Методология систем: вербальный подход. - М.; ОАО «Издательство «Экономика», 1999. - 251 с. [28.03.2024.]

And Dark Energy and String theory and Super string theory as well .. All tosh

They never address the bullet cluster elephant in the room right off the bat. It is a must for lay audiences or it won’t be taken seriously. If it is in the longer video I’ll click the link, otherwise no interest

@carlhitchon1009

11 ай бұрын

Don't be so sure what this one cluster interaction is actually telling us. It's not a slam dunk.

Пора вернуть в физику понятие Эфира и все встанет на свои места.Именно в России развивается новая физика под название Эфиродинамика - это и станет в будущем настоящим Мировым прорывом в науке !

It's just hard to accept MOD at the moment.

It's centrifugal force. Occums Razor says so.

Leptiionan Mechanics of Muonic Fields

@joshua3171

11 ай бұрын

everyone has a theory

Try incorruptible milk of dark energy. Just write [ Huh kyung young ] on the milk bottle.

Pavel: 100 Hysterical woman: 0

there is only invisiblr non matter pure energy which could be sythesized as waves in constant mouvement. This energy comes in fields like a tissue intervoven and our BB is just a tiny quadrant but blew up the continued surrounding fields into all different seizes big ones center of galaxies smaller stars planets and every atom and these broken pieces tries to remake the original field , we can observe the interfearance where everything is included and that makes it rather flat . The sun must have been a maxihydrogen star with jupiter as only planet after that the timeline is not clear when the other plants arrive , but evolution seem to be a leed motif so why not, getting more he the star becomes a he star after that lithium then beryl for now 4 big planets (electrons).

Dark matter might be hidden dimension that resists space-time symmetry .....

📍10:35

Newton asked (and answered) the wrong question and billions since (including Albert Einstein) have wasted their entire life either learning it and/or trying to adjust the answer to fit the observstions. The problem is not whether the answer is correct or wrong, but the question itself, viz. WHY APPPLES FALL?, is totally irrelevant for sustenance of life on this earth. The correct question that any system of knowledge should answer, if it is to serve sustenance of life on this earth and, as a consequence, in the entire known universe, is: HOW APPLES GROW? The 2 fundamental assumptions of the FAITH, on which TEOS (The Experimental and Observational Science) is based, are FATALISTICALLY SLAVISH and CHAOCRATIC: 1) that there exists a force (or system of laws) that determines the flow of all events in the universe irrespective of what we do in it, 2) the mechanism how it works can be discovered by analyzing phenomena without any purpose, so called "knowledge for its own sake" out of curiosity. The only purpose we search for knowledge MUST be FOR THE SATISFACTION OF THE NEEDS OF ALL BEINGS. Hence, the criterion of proof for verification of the accuracy of so acquired knowledge must also be shifted to the single criterion, PRACTICAL SATISFACTION OF THE ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED NEEDS, from the current triple criteria (falsifiability, testability and repeatability), for the former implies all these automatically, if they are relevant. Unless TEOS makes this crucial change at least at this late stage, all its inventions (yes!) would inevitably join the epicycles, deferents and eccentrics of the pre Copernican era, that engaged the minds of the most intelligent members of the entire human race for well over 2 millenia, in the dumpyard of history.

That irritating presenter keeps interrupting.

a new chapter needed for Thomas Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions'

According to the great mathematician and Nuclear physicist Homer J Simpson the correct answer is a torus. Doh!

Should bring to this debate leading cosmological to it not a beginner.

Interrupting too much.

Francesca was too polite. She should have interrupted when the guy who claimed there are no successes of dark matter theory didn't give her an opportunity to describe any.

@tenbear5

11 ай бұрын

She was also embarrassingly wrong and confused.

@brothermine2292

11 ай бұрын

@@tenbear5 : Really? That better describes the guy who said dark matter has had no successes. Francesca didn't speak enough to be able to conclude much about her.

@tenbear5

11 ай бұрын

@@brothermine2292 Exactly, & she’s supposed to know what she’s talking about! Cosmology is in a place.

@ianw5024

11 ай бұрын

It really doesn't matter. All the evidence favours dark matter. MOND is on its death bed. Public debates aren't going to change that.

@urtyp6596

9 ай бұрын

Pavel: 100 Hysterical Karen: 0

Imagine if quantum gravity is when virtual particles come into being. Like a Hola in a stadium. Virtual particles can form pattern. That is the deformation if space time. Like an edg dislocation of atoms in iron. That shifting of atome is the deformation. That shifting of virtual particles is the gravitational wabe and the bending

Your website is trash and will not let me cancel my free trial. I have emailed you multiple times to cancel with no reply. Do no sign up for a free trial for this website.

Dark matter is related to anti matter?

@arctic_haze

11 ай бұрын

Nope

She got wrecked 😂😂😂

@urtyp6596

9 ай бұрын

Back into the kitchen hysterical woman!

"... the whole model of the universe is probably not correct ..." Please google "pavel kroupa dark matter", "kepler kroupa milgrom", & "dark matter compensation constant einstein's field equations: 3 criticisms".

Dark Matter would increase the density of space near massive objects. The hidden mountain called Great Meru likely a product of Dark Matter.

MOND is a failed hypothesis. Next.

very short video

Wow! Though mond is interesting it fairs more than it succeeds.....be honest man!

MOND is cope. Just admit einstein is your jesus and boomer narcissism has taken hold of physics.