If you like, please find our e-Book here: datatab.net/statistics-book 😎

This is the only video that has satisfied my curiosity about Cronbach’s alpha. Thank you so much!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks for your nice feedback! Regards Hannah

You have the best explanations anywhere in the known universe of statistics! THANK YOU!

I love how you show us the examples. Very clear and practical!

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

The best explanation I found after days of looking up various places for help. Thank You!

Thank you for being clear, concise and informative. The video was very helpful!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks for making this video!! You made it so much easier to understand and love your examples!!!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful! Many thanks for your feedback! Regards Hannah

Thank you so much for your video! your explanation is so intuitive and so clear

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks for the Feedback! Regards, Hannah

thank you for your short and precise explanation.

This video is so great! It explains very clearly!

thank you for the best and crisp explanation. it does not take so much time yet precise. it would be very useful if you teach Multi level modelling and structural equation modelling using AMOS

I will definitely have my students have a go at using your online statistical computing facility. Many thanks!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks Maria! Regards Hannah & Mathias

learned many new things in a simple way from here...the best veeos

This was actually VERY helpful - thanks so much for creating this!

@datatab

2 ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful! Regards Hannah

Thanks a lot. Excellent video!!! Easy to understand and useful.

Your whole tutorials are amazing. A question: Do your DataTAB able to measure the validity (Discriminate and Convergent)?

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

what methods would you need for that? The simple correlation can be calculated of course! Regards Hannah

Very clear and simple explanation!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks! 😊Regards, Hannah

An excellent explanation, thank you.

Thank youu for the vid, very simple and comprehensive!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful! Regards, Hannah

Thank you! It helped me so much.

Excellent explanation. Thank you!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks! Glad it was helpful! Regards Hannah : )

Thanks so much. It is very clear explanation.

Amazing explanation, thank you!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks! 😊Regards, Hannah

Nice, makes it easy understandble

Thank you so much, this video really saves my time.

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it helped!

How do I handle the test if I have missing values? In case I have an option of NA. Thank you for the video!

thanks for the video , very helpful video.

Please can you also provide drawback of the test at the end it will really help

Awsom thank you loved it

Thank you for making this look very less mystical. It was really helpful.

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

Thanks for the information.

Thank you. Clear and sound

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks!!! 😊 Regards, Hannah

great video. easy to understand. Thank you !!!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

MANY THANKS IT"s kind from you

Please can you carry out such test on questionnaires with yes or no answers?

The alpha crombagh is used to find the realabiity of every kind of questions? thanks for you help

Can this be used with non-latent variables, actual scientific measurements, to determine if there is reliability in multiple trials of a scientific experiment and if more trials are needed to achieve data reliability?

Great video, thank you!

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it!

Very precise and accurate...thanks alot 🙏

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!!!!

In which situation , we can use the Alpha cronbach analysis

Thank you so much

what is corrected ltem-Total Correlation indicate for?

Well explained!! Thanks

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful and many thanks for feedback! Regards Hannah

Well explained!❤

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Thank you! 🙂

hi, what is the minimum of cronbach's alpha? is 0.6 a good reliability?

This is great thank you

@datatab

7 ай бұрын

You're very welcome!

Thsi is sooo awasome

Need to calculate different variables captured in minutes how to apply for this

Great video!

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

so good and easy to understand

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Many thanks!

That is so useful!!!!!

Hi there, when you say "the goal now is that the responses to the various items match well, i.e., are highly correlated", does it matter if some questions are highly positively correlated while other questions are highly negatively correlated? How does the sign of the correlation affect Cronbach's alpha?

@brendansharp4856

Жыл бұрын

Im pretty sure it doesnt matter if they are positively or negatively correlated. The aim is to measure consistency, so whether that is positive or negative doesn't matter but rather that consistency does exist between the results

I feel like I'm asking a stupid question but.... regarding the example you gave about extroversion: because the "Cronbach's Alpha if deleted" for "enjoying social situations," is it too much to interpret that the item "enjoying social situations" is not a good indicator for measuring extroversion (in this specific example/dataset) altogether? Could it also mean that the other 3 items, though highly correlated to each other, are irrelevant to extroversion and "enjoying social situations" is actually the only appropriate item for measuring extroversion?

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Sorry for the late answer! Yes, your sentence at the end is correct! With Cronbach's alpha, you can only measure the extent to which a group of questions is related to each other. Whether they really measure what they are supposed to measure is not something you can say! Therefore, it is also possible that all three items are very similar but measure something else and the one question only measures the "right thing". Regards, Hannah

@UraraHopeT16842

2 жыл бұрын

@@datatab This was helpful, thanks!!

Thank you! Whats the difference between Cronbach's alpha and ICC?

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Hmm, I think Cronbach's alpha is a special case of ICC, but I have not investigated this and therefore consider the answer with caution! Regards Hannah

Great video. By the way, your voice remided me of audrey hepburn hehe:)

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

: )

thanks so much

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome and thanks for the nice feedback! Regards, Hannah

Thank u!

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

You're welcome!

Thank you mam 😍😍❤️

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

Most welcome 😊

Madam, please add how to write in a dissertation about Cronbach's alpha statement

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks for the feedback! I will put it on the to-do list! 😊Regards, Hannah

Good Video..

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the nice feedback! Regards, Hannah

If I have 377 poeple to gather data, Respondents should be counted all of the people I have for Cronbach’s Alpha , is it right? Thank you for explaining

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Yes I think so, not sure if I understood the question exactly but that should fit!

@soohyeonlee6753

2 жыл бұрын

@@datatab I have 29 questions and 377 respondents to interview, distribute questionnaire and 5- Likert scale,

Hello, I don't have an account of Data Tab, can you calculate the data for me?

@datatab

Жыл бұрын

It is cheap, just buy one!

@arnoldgulay743

Жыл бұрын

@@datatab I don't have money, I am just a student, I'm from Philippines.

sweet voice

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

Many thanks! 😊Regards, Hannah

Ah this is great. Danke aus Indonesien

2:20 "the condition must be fulfilled... that all questions or items measure the same latent variable" Does that mean that, I can't calculate cronbach's alpha on questionnaires which have a single item for every domain? Thanks!

Sounds weird though... Suppose your items (questions) were perfectly correlated, your alpha would be then >=1 (=excellent according to George and Mallery's interpretation). I would find this case undesiderable, it means you were not smart enough to "design" your questions; just knowing the answers of one question would let you perfectly guess the answers of the rest of the questions (?). Imagine this case: no! yes! I love chocolate ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ I hate chocolate ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

@datatab

7 ай бұрын

Yes, you're right! In a good Likert scale, the individual items should not correlate extremely highly with one another!

You sound like Arnold

@datatab

2 жыл бұрын

: )

English from babble