Well...Craig said I was right in the pinned comment on his video.

@MilitantThomist

9 ай бұрын

@@computationaltheist7267?

@CroElectroStile

9 ай бұрын

Pretty admirable

@CroElectroStile

9 ай бұрын

He removed the video @@computationaltheist7267

@thomistica_

9 ай бұрын

he deleted his video lol@@computationaltheist7267

@aleccaruana

8 ай бұрын

4:46 Bringing up someone's moral failings, when they aren't directed at you or affect the dispute, is an unnecessarily low blow. Especially when you're trying to focus on the arguments.

The response was so good, you got him to delete the video

@thomistica_

9 ай бұрын

🤣

@samuelmurphy7943

9 ай бұрын

EO (jay and Craig) never lose an argument it’s the magic of the internet

@buffcommie942

18 күн бұрын

tbh thats admirable from Craig, when you are wrong you are wrong

Jay dyer when debating Muslims: " You can't quote some random Bible scholars and say this proves your view-thats a fallacy!" Also Jay when there's a random footnote that supports his view:

Incredible that St. Thomas anticipated St. Basil's reasoning, even though a complete translation was not available to him.

@MilitantThomist

9 ай бұрын

There are a number of instances where I have seen him pull this...he has an incredible theological intuition like I have never seen in anyone else (except, perhaps, John of St. Thomas)

@user-ud9tk4qg6t

9 ай бұрын

​@@MilitantThomist They don't call him the "angelic doctor" for nothin'. Clearly, he was graced with something of an "angelic intellect." 😉

I just watched a video from Truglia and he said that your objections were “surface level.” 💀

As an Orthodox Christian, I wanted to say how I appreciate how you conduct yourself, in general! You’re the type of guy I’d get a beer with and talk theology lol Did you read all of Siecienski’s paper on the Letter to Marinus that you reference in this video? I felt he addressed some of the contentions between you and David during the debate that David seemed to struggle a little more in responding to. When you engage in topics of debate that are heavy in terminological nuance, have you prayerfully considered the possibility that you approach the earlier fathers’ writings through the lens of Aquinas and his inheritance (which is reasonable for a faithful RC), rather than approaching the earlier Fathers without such a “flavor”? I can imagine that being difficult for someone who admires Aquinas so much, I am just wondering if you considered that! Thanks for your videos.

Truglia hoisted by own petard!😂

I think Jay Dyer is going to have a live stream discussing your debate. I would love to see more against his fallacies. He is the perfect example of someone who has read a lot, knows a lot but doesn’t understand a lot. He has knowledge but he lacks understanding and therefore wisdom. He’s dangerous because he is an example of the truth that a little knowledge without wisdom is very dangerous. He misleads many souls.

Good haircut, good video! God bless!

Can you link to the actual debate. Thanks 👍

Excellent

24:38 I'm in that "some" who are pretty happy about the 10 minutes research.

Hey, Branson is my philosophy professor and he’s a really charitable guy as far as I know. If you do debate him, it wouldn’t be a whole lot of drama, and I’d like to see how he engages with Catholic arguments.

@RomanusVII

9 ай бұрын

@Boulanger948 He’s Orthodox. He’s focused on metaphysics, philosophy of religion, etc. The main reason I suggest him is because he doesn’t get rude or toxic when he’s questioned or pressed on issues.

Bon appetite 3:40, but it’s Wednesday brother, just wanted to remind you of the days for next time 😊

Craig Foolio is a real - Mother Lover

@ Militant Thomas: In what video(s) do you address yourself to Perry Robinson as mentioned toward the end of your remarks here? Searched your videos, did not find anything. The instant video was very good, but for certain remarks near the beginning which, while vague, were unnecessary, and if anything detracted from the force of your presentation, verging on if not in fact detrahere, as per the definition in the first sentence of the old Catholic Encyclopedia article on that subject. More dyerish than Wagnerian there, I daresay. Cut that part, would be my suggestion; it doesn't advance your argument.

@namapalsu2364

9 ай бұрын

I saw it on twitter. Not sure if it's on video.

So is Fr. Kappes agreeing with truglia in this exchange?

@YajunYuanSDA

9 ай бұрын

Fr. Kappes says Trent Horn is wrong for thinking Jerome translated Genesis 3:15 with "She".

so filioque is more strong argumen againt ortodox than papacy. is it true?

@MajorasTime

9 ай бұрын

The canon of scripture is also a strong argument against Eastern Orthodoxy

@koppite9600

9 ай бұрын

@@MajorasTime how?

@Mkvine

9 ай бұрын

@@koppite9600Read Albretch’s new book on this

@brandoncummins7813

9 ай бұрын

no@@MajorasTime

@jebbush2527

9 ай бұрын

@@koppite9600 kzread.info/dash/bejne/f4mFr5SsqsWnhto.htmlsi=-QnG4GqNvZ1ZNwXh

You do a great harm to the Christian Faith and offense to God by defending the filoque. I know that sounds ignorant to state so assertively. But God will vindicate in the end. Roman Catholics should fear and repent of this heresy. Peace to all, with love, from a fellow sinner, in Christ.

Bro you are killing it went come to the filioque, you and dwong are to strong for the Orthodox 💪

Where can I find this debate?

@101caliber

9 ай бұрын

Sam Shamoun's KZread channel, IIRC

@delvingeorge2807

9 ай бұрын

Samounian