Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC or Mobile: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/8f6c32f2 Receive an Amazing New Player Pack, only available for the next 30 days!

@ifureadthis_urgay

3 жыл бұрын

I already play it. I guess it's pretty good. Unfortunately i this game is EXTREMELY p2w but luckily, there's only small amount of whales in the playerbase so you're probably not gonna encounter them much.

@pyeitme508

3 жыл бұрын

Reminds me of Call of Duty MW

@omarjawhary887

3 жыл бұрын

How about arab league vs israel

@ronniehopper2726

3 жыл бұрын

Best guess about half the United States side with the Russians, you guys seem to have freer and fairer elections

@stangarcia

3 жыл бұрын

Top

"let's just say, hypothetically, Ukraine splits and Russia takes half" Well sir, it seems like Russia wants the full thing. Not half

@chairde

2 жыл бұрын

Ukraine takes everything and Russia pays reparations.

@TheBloodRedDane

2 жыл бұрын

@Brett Rose you misspelt "Fascists'"

@coajdka

Жыл бұрын

@@TheBloodRedDane you mispelt liberators

@krish4134

Жыл бұрын

@@coajdka you spelt monsters wrong

@tefky7964

Жыл бұрын

@@coajdka Liberators? They liberate Ukrainians against their will?

I've played Conflict of Nations, it takes a lot of your time and is 100% pay to win.

@martimsalvador9186

3 жыл бұрын

Couldn't agree more

@Sahd079

3 жыл бұрын

@@martimsalvador9186 call of war is better

@carissaglassburn2916

3 жыл бұрын

It's pretty doable without money if you play on the Flashpoint map (just Europe and parts of North America and Africa), as there are less players per game making it less likely to run into one of the pay-to-winners. My strategy is mainly to spam mechanized infantry and blitzkrieg surrounding countries one by one. If someone is spending money it's usually pretty easy to notice when they effortlessly 5v1 or something, at which point I just leave immediately. It's an extremely stressful game either way though, since at any time someone near you could completely screw you over while you're gone.

@martimsalvador9186

3 жыл бұрын

@@Sahd079 they are pretty similar. I dont like this type of games. They are stressful

@Natogoon

3 жыл бұрын

In Supremacy 1914, a similar game, I use a second account and VPN to buff my nation at the start of each game to get ahead of the pay 2 win retards. Works every time.

We know now that Binkov definitely overstated the effectiveness of the Russian Airforce here. Common theme 🙄

@spartenkiller456

Жыл бұрын

So did everyone else at the time.

@voidtempering8700

10 ай бұрын

​@@spartenkiller456I don't even think he overstated it. Fighting against aircraft supported by your own IADS and AWACS is a lot different than what is happening in Ukraine.

@spartenkiller456

10 ай бұрын

@@voidtempering8700 Russia has both of those things and the third largest air Force in the world, too bad none of it works as advertised. Oh well, sucks to suck I guess.

This aged like fine milk

@Prometheus7272

Жыл бұрын

Did it though? US still couldn't invade given these conditions, it needs a land border

@kyodairiker

Жыл бұрын

@@Prometheus7272 which is all of western Europe basically

@Prometheus7272

Жыл бұрын

@Kyodai Riker Yes the video is stupid nonetheless accurate given the premise.

@robertwilson214

Жыл бұрын

I think this aged cos I listen to propaganda that told me there's never Ukrainian losses

@ExPraetorianGuard-dl1pz

4 ай бұрын

​@@kyodairikerit still can't tho, Russia is a nuclear power which can obliterate USA

Expectation: Modern Warfare 1-2 Reality: Fallout Series

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

Stupidest stories were 2 and 3 in that entire series

@elitedima9672

3 жыл бұрын

More like Metro 2033 series

@paprikaa117

3 жыл бұрын

Me and the boys in the trench right before the Russians drop a nuke on us:

@jcjcjunk1881

3 жыл бұрын

*I T S A L L OVER*

@arrowup8711

3 жыл бұрын

@@paprikaa117 don't r/woooosh me but I'm pretty sure the radiation could still reach you in a trench

Short answer: NO Long answer: Just NO...

@abelradebe9644

3 жыл бұрын

Imaginery answer No

@rebornpharaoh3617

3 жыл бұрын

obvious answer hell no brutal answer fuck no friendly answer hahahaha no racist answer yankees no

@gregcreek5715

3 жыл бұрын

@Република Српска Крајина Afghanistan ran Russia out of their country in 3 years. America can & will stay there as long as we wish too.

@maquacr7014

3 жыл бұрын

@@gregcreek5715 Lol 10 years not 3 years.

@maquacr7014

3 жыл бұрын

@Chris T Not anymore, son.

“The reason for such an unlikely event would be unrealistic” that aged poorly.

@titanely5723

2 жыл бұрын

Why can't we all just get along 😭

This aged well

So, USA will need to sacrifice half of his army to take Kamchatka. lol

@sidharthakumar8563

3 жыл бұрын

US be like: I've won but at what cost 😂

@kingquackie7284

3 жыл бұрын

@@sidharthakumar8563 Kamchatka: Do you see torpedo boats?!

@andreadecario5187

3 жыл бұрын

Kamchatka: trade offert!you recive Kamchatka I recive:half of your army

@keke3441

3 жыл бұрын

and russia would lose it's entire army losing Kamchatka. LOL

@TheFlanker47

3 жыл бұрын

@@keke3441 not according to the video, keep crying.

Napoleon and Hitler say "Don't do it!".

@tforaodg

3 жыл бұрын

genghis khan: why not?

@negan5374

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly, Obama tried it. Never worked over Crimea

@ClarityPCGaming

3 жыл бұрын

@@negan5374 your fledgling authortian of a leader annexed a free democratic city into his empire, and Barack obama did nothing about it. He was a panzy, and if we had better leadership crimea would still be free and people would have needlessly not have died.

@duca746

3 жыл бұрын

@@ClarityPCGaming Crime is a free,but as your historiy is only 200 years old,I dond aspect you to understand that. And what Barak could do about it,if he wanted,to kill a Rusian solder? Worst mistake he could do.

@imcloud305

3 жыл бұрын

Don't invade russia My final message

The germans tried..frenchies napoleon tried...maybe the U.S got the Avengers supporting them🤣🤣🤣

I think its time to redo this video as the assumptions about Russia no longer apply

@lukesaylor6742

2 жыл бұрын

I think binkov is probably right assuming Russia stragically and sensibly uses their forces.... But Russia will probably just throw their troops at the enemy blindly instead😂

USA and Russia after the war: Thats it, we did it lads, our populations are no more !

@spectre9078

3 жыл бұрын

@@-Raff- pretty sure the n-word but poorly sensored

@-Raff-

3 жыл бұрын

@@spectre9078 thats what i thought lmao

@-Raff-

3 жыл бұрын

@かたわれ時 everyone: thats it lads, we are all fucked !

@brookswashere4661

3 жыл бұрын

@@-Raff- haha have a good time being suspended after I reported you like 40 times for supporting racism and making death threats to me just because I have a picture of some dude who didnt even kill himself awwww kid with 2 moms haha

@brookswashere4661

3 жыл бұрын

@@spectre9078 its actually censored you cant spell so who's Brian is poorly censored right now

You should do small countries fighting eachother like Vatican city vs Luxembourg

@juanantoniogragasin1685

3 жыл бұрын

They're the 189! 🎶

@poppy63765

3 жыл бұрын

Luxembourg would win

@ChonoIsland

3 жыл бұрын

@@poppy63765 mabye but the Vatican is in Italy so Luxembourg would be hard pressed to invade Italy

@Schnitz13

3 жыл бұрын

Or the Vatican vs. San Marino.

@jonhart7630

3 жыл бұрын

@@poppy63765 The Vatican has got the Swiss Guard; heavily armed with pikes and broad swords.

This fight would be suicide for both countries as well as all life on earth

Lol it’s hilarious how back in the day we actually treated Russian army inwardly as a serious threat

@jaycentoret2866

Жыл бұрын

still ARE

@antonifondupencat2578

Жыл бұрын

@@jaycentoret2866 perhaps to the Balkans and Central Europe, the only concern is their rocketry and artillery. We simply have to secure the aerospace, apply air radars and anti air defenses

@jaycentoret2866

Жыл бұрын

@@antonifondupencat2578 well thats treu but i think russia has advantage in combat experiance in ukraine

@antonifondupencat2578

Жыл бұрын

@@jaycentoret2866 their combat experience in Ukraine is quintessentially dying and failing. The Wagner group faced no opposition when driving toward Moscow, heck, the Russian troops even praised them. If indicates how weak Russia actually is, and the arbitrary regime is under threat

@jaycentoret2866

Жыл бұрын

@@antonifondupencat2578 i dislike putin but i think russian and ukrainian army are the only with lange scala war experience

Everybody gangsta until the revive button appears in Marshall Zhukov's grave

@va1lter_

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao

@joemamaobama6863

3 жыл бұрын

SERVE ME WASHINGTON ON A PLATE

@johngarrand645

3 жыл бұрын

Zhukov ain't got shit on General Schwarzkopf!!!!!

@pissyourselfandshitncoom2172

3 жыл бұрын

@@johngarrand645 that sounds like a German name

Q: Can USA invade Russia ? A: One lesson that history has taught us is that you don’t.

@silangangbahagi9267

3 жыл бұрын

Napoleon and Hitler: Good Question. Its no!

@user-jv7yx6nf6g

3 жыл бұрын

Usa was thinking they can change not legal in Ukraine government and make military base in Crimea but Russia became winer .

@Ambera3407

3 жыл бұрын

Everyone: No one has successfully invaded Russia German empire: *sighs, forgotten to history*

@brookswashere4661

3 жыл бұрын

Can you invade us oil plants One lesson in 2018 has taught us is you cant 😒🇺🇲🥇

@vladimirshurik3608

3 жыл бұрын

Nobody wants a land war in Eurasia.

Watching this in 2022 be like:hey guys,Is this thing on live?

This didn’t age well.

@jbman12000

2 жыл бұрын

so true!

I love how most of the comments are bias preferences and most don’t even make sense. Hell I’ve seen the same people argue in different comments over it. It’s a hypothetical scenario, no nukes, no allies you don’t need to get all defensive over it.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

Amen. Jingoism runs high in both the Russian Federation and the USA; compounded by the sour-grape aroma wafting from sh-t-hole dwelling, anti-American sore losers.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff Careful what you wish for. If America doesn't retaliate and destroy all human life, we might just mutate from the nuclear fallout into star-spangled X-men and subsequently conquer Russia with our new-found super-powers.

@s.a928

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff Missiles dont appear out of thin air... Russia needs to produce them, they're expensive. In ICBM numbers the US has more. Its not going to matter tho the world will get destroyed regardless lol.

@fluent4530

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff no they won’t only in the most dire of circumstances in fact I will be bold enough to say there will never be a war that is comparable to ww2 in a very long time due to nuclear weapons The shear fact that nukes can level entire nations keeps major powers from fighting each other Hell if it wasn’t for the atomic bombs dropped on Japan The Soviets would have probably try to take all of Europe after they reached Berlin Either that or another war on the scale of ww3 probably would have already happened Nuclear weapons are double edged swords on one hand. They can Destroy our entire planet On the other hand they keep major conflicts like world wars from ever happening again

@technologyworld7621

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jshehejsehsh Turkish Army vs Greek Army Military Comparision kzread.info/dash/bejne/q4mB0KhqXc6xlqg.html

The US: It will work this time I promise Sweden, France, and Germany: Are you sure about that?

@mint8648

3 жыл бұрын

Mongols, tatars, poles: yes

@captaindak5119

3 жыл бұрын

@@mint8648 The examples you listed are from further in the past when Russia was waaay smaller and weaker. The OP's examples are more relevant. Poles? Are you referring to the Polish Muscovite War? If yes, the Poles were forced out of Russia after their king pissed of the Russians.

@mint8648

3 жыл бұрын

@@captaindak5119 ok but the poles held the title of czar for two years and the mongols conquered every russian state. also the germans in ww1 invaded russia successfully

@mint8648

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff no they won’t using nukes is not within any nation’s self-interest

@mint8648

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff they’ll just retaliate, making russia’s situation even worse

Key words: If we wanted too? Answer: NO

The irony of the opening of this video compared to what is happening today is frightening

I mean, technically they can, the success rate is probably 0% though, meaning they'd end up nuking each other.

@6688ya

3 жыл бұрын

Even without nukes succes rate still 0 %

@johnnybc1520

3 жыл бұрын

People don't escalate to nuclear just because they fail their objective by conventional arms. See vietnam and afghanistan

@La_Muertx_PR

3 жыл бұрын

There could be a cold war between them but not a fight against each other... They will end up killing all living things in the Earth

@MikoyanGurevichMiG21

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnnybc1520 bruh neither Vietnam nor Afghanistan had nukes themselves. Assymetrical wars cannot compare to straight up wars with another superpower.

@johnnybc1520

3 жыл бұрын

@@MikoyanGurevichMiG21 see Korean war

The thought of the US invading Russia and vice versa is just unthinkable.

@sebastianbratu1502

3 жыл бұрын

How about now

@osamabinladen824

3 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianbratu1502 It's possible. But not doable.

@arrowup8711

3 жыл бұрын

@@sebastianbratu1502 It wouldn't be worth the death toll.

@sebastianbratu1502

3 жыл бұрын

@@arrowup8711 nice brand, arrow

@lightningbolt4419

3 жыл бұрын

Operation unthinkable

So, barring nuclear weapons I'm thinking the answer is now yes.

@garrettfulks2932

2 жыл бұрын

Yes but the U.S. would have all of N.A.T.O. and their allies and given Russia’s poor military performance in Ukraine, a N.A.T.O. victory is more likely. Also the U.S. didn’t lose to the militaries of Iraq and Afghanistan they lost to an insurgency. However in the case of Russia it would determine how loyal the people are to Putin.

@prasunkumar117

2 жыл бұрын

@Mile Hoho there is a difference between defeating and occupying. Britisher defeated our maharaja and freedom fighting forces but we still won after 100 years of occupation.

@FelixHaukeland

2 жыл бұрын

@@prasunkumar117 your ‘war’ was won by Germans and Japanese.

@redmihello1020

2 жыл бұрын

@@garrettfulks2932 US Alone can do it.

Who else came here after Russia invaded Ukraine?

U.S.A vs Russia. That would be a fight for the ages.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

More like a fight to reboot the stone age.

@hughcaires7434

3 жыл бұрын

@@Grenadier311 I can agree with that.

@youareveryannoying9179

3 жыл бұрын

Would be like the great mushroom war of adventure time

@duurnamets9678

3 жыл бұрын

No it will be the end of rhe world.

@rebornpharaoh3617

3 жыл бұрын

white supremacist vs white friends

Alternate History: Poland and Czechoslovakia vs Germany(1938)

@prouddegenerates9056

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting, maybe winnable without Russia getting involved.

@wartrix6046

3 жыл бұрын

Germany would probably win, Germany was pretty militarized by then. And in our timeline the Germans had already crushed Poland by the time the soviets invaded, so in this world Germany could probably have blitzed through Poland and Czechoslovakia.

@prouddegenerates9056

3 жыл бұрын

@@wartrix6046 The allience would definitely be the underdog, but I dont think its out of the question.

@Mewithabeard

3 жыл бұрын

Germany would still win but have a harder time. Also is this before or after the Sudetenland being annexed or does it happen at all? Good idea for a video either way😁

@kleuafflatus

3 жыл бұрын

What about modern Czechoslovakia vs nazi Germany? Edit: As in modern Czech and Slovakia together as one nation and military combined against Germany in late 30s, just like in one of those fun modern Poland vs germany and ussr alternative videos in this channel Go look up binkov's video about modern Poland army owning the Germans in ww2

U.S. Military would have to create a tractor division, but it should't be that hard...

I usually watch all the videos all the way thru but come on we wouldn’t use any of our bases in NATO countries ? As soon as I heard that I was like yup not even going to watch the rest of this one. Plus #2 ranked Russia in military might is getting smacked up by the #22 ranked Ukraine. America has also a lot more combat experience and far superior technology than the Ukrainian military. I think the USA, British or German’s would dog walk the Russian’s. However it would also depend on each country’s objective.

@qingyoung9057

2 жыл бұрын

The United States has even been defeated by small countries like Vietnam and Afghanistan, and you can't compare that way

@Kevin-np3sx

Жыл бұрын

@@qingyoung9057 they will lose if they stay and occupy russia, but first the US will decimate the russian military.

“Can [insert country here] win a ground war in Russia?” Spoilers: no

@alanfriesen9837

3 жыл бұрын

Same goes for China and the United States.

@ozone2031

3 жыл бұрын

@Die_Hard_Diesel The countries with enough population to challenge USA in ground war are across ocean, so it will be a nightmare of logistics

@KatiePhongh

3 жыл бұрын

@@alanfriesen9837 agreed. Any country that big creates untenable supply lines and the vastness of land mass makes occupation impossible.

@jakab7355

3 жыл бұрын

@Doglover extrem yea Mor Than 9 contry vs 1 yea

@jakab7355

3 жыл бұрын

@Doglover extrem yea napoleon and Hitler Both thought they were stronger but we let them fail :)

Short answer: no one can successfully invade russia, haven't we learned from history? 😂

@guessthatsitthen4982

3 жыл бұрын

@Your Majesty, no... it shows that they would get bogged down and not win.. What video are you watching?

@guessthatsitthen4982

3 жыл бұрын

@Your Majesty, did the mongols conquer all of russia? No? Ok then.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@@guessthatsitthen4982 They did succeed in reducing the Russian principalities to vassal states, but Muscovy had the last laugh.

@user-jb4hs4op7y

3 жыл бұрын

Because they invaded from the wrong side

@brookswashere4661

3 жыл бұрын

Lol and what about Russian mercs trying to invade a us oil plant 3 years ago That seem fair 😏

Based on the Performance of the Russian navy in the war in Ukraine. I doubt there will be that much us air and sea losses.

@yawokyere8416

2 жыл бұрын

them I dare the US to enter Russia 😂

@combatmuffin3192

2 жыл бұрын

@@yawokyere8416 Don't think the US could hold Russia or china but it would definitely destroy both of those air forces and navies.

@adamosborne9938

2 жыл бұрын

The United States will never attack another country to expand. We are content with our own country away from everyone else. We do attack other country's who threaten freedom and peace weather it be terrorists or some shit dictator.

@JosephJamesDeAngelo1986

2 жыл бұрын

@@yawokyere8416 oh we will soon little doggy 🤣

This is just a bad idea, the reason why hitler failed in WW2 betrayed Russia and tried invading Russia and lost bout 2 million troops, and you can also read napoleon attempt as wel

Absolutely no reason for a war with Russia.

@elsauce4873

3 жыл бұрын

No but that’s not what this video is about, and that’s why he said it himself.

@gonkthegreatconquer3692

3 жыл бұрын

Hypothetical scenario

@Peter_Turbo4

3 жыл бұрын

@Ventura Don’t worry, Slow Joe will find a reason

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

No good, sane reasons not counterintuitive.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@@BigRW @R W Yep. We're at 8 percent of the world's population now, down from 25 just before wwI, as you may know, counting actual European Whites and not generic Caucasians. I unloaded on this moron last night whining about White Supremacy. Informed the bigot that it's the wealthy who run the world, not the race they're selling out, and that we're being replaced, not empowered, by oligarchs and other so-called elites who favor brown for green. I did my part and had a fair-haired child. Now, it's up to me convince her to keep the line pure; battling negative influences from her in-law family and grandmother who cross over and actively undermine the endeavor with real prejudice against me. It's not about bigotry anymore. It's a matter of survival. Be healthy.

The Mongols,French and Germans(twice)had tried to conquer Russia ,and when the wars seemed to be lost for Russia,it always ends up winning.

@Sean-yk8he

3 жыл бұрын

Germany would have if the west didn’t attack them

@damir7768

3 жыл бұрын

@@Sean-yk8he I don't have any doubt that you're American, you just have 0 knowledges about history...

@damir7768

3 жыл бұрын

@@Sean-yk8he USSR take down Germany almost by themselves they didn't wait the "Braves" americans... UK was not able to attack Germany (except with no consequences raids) and USA arrived very lately they was too busy against Japan, Ussr arrived in Germany (I don't talk about berlin) even before that usa arrived in France from England...

@Sean-yk8he

3 жыл бұрын

@@damir7768 The Soviets could not have withstood the full weight of the German war machine by themselves. German military power was diluted by fighting in North Africa and in western Europe. A concentration of Germany’s resources entirely devoted defeating the Soviets would have won the war in the east. German armored / mobile units often surrounded Red Armies but couldn’t prevent their escape due to a lack of men to seal the huge battlefield areas. More manpower for the Wehrmacht would have solved this problem. The early success of Barbarossa caused a food shortage in the USSR. The Soviets also lacked the production capacity to manufacture trucks they desperately needed. Without trucks they couldn’t move artillery. The Allies of the USSR made up the shortages the Soviets were experiencing The US and the United Kingdom shipped massive amounts of ammo, food, communications equipment and trucks to the Soviets. Below is an answer I’m recycling that touched on this subject. Germany would have won WW2 if Britain accepted Hitler’s generous peace terms. Peace with the British would have allowed Hitler to become the master of Europe. The British upper class supported Hitler and certain politicians felt it wasn’t worth “Dying for Danzig”. Churchill resisted this heavy pressure. A settlement would have granted Hitler a free hand in the East. He would have won his war against the Soviets due to the elimination of major problems before Barbarossa commenced. Problems solved by a Anglo / German peace include: No Western Front would exist to drain men, arms, fuel and industrial production including for the coastal fortifications and guns. 1,900,000 Wehrmacht served on the Western Front at “peak deployment ”. These troops would have been released to the Eastern Front. Total German losses on the western front between 1944-1945: 263,000 - 655,000 killed - 400,000 wounded - 4,209,840 captured. 5,000,000 additional German troops would have faced the Soviets. It’s unlikely the Soviets could withstand the weigh of this massive deployment. ]The entire Wehrmacht plus their equipment and weapons would have been deployed in Operation Barbarossa. This would include the 1,977 planes lost in the Battle of Britain. The British would have supplied oil and fuel as part of the settlement. The oil fields of Romania would have escaped Allied bombing. Germany’s chronic oil shortage would have been eased or solved. No lend Lease war material would have been shipped to Stalin. The USSR’s shortage of ammo, communication equipment, trucks, food and weapons wouldn’t have been overcome. The US supplied 375,000 trucks alone. Total trucks including from Britain: 450,000. With Britain out of the war Hitler would not have declared war on the US as an inducement for Japan to enter the war. Hitler stated “the Americans are in this war already attacking our ships and suppling our enemies”. With the U.K at peace President Roosevelt would not have had reason to involve America in another European war defending the USSR. The war in North Africa would not have occurred. The Germans lost hundreds of thousands of men, 2,500 tanks, 8,000 aircraft, 70,000 trucks and 2,400,000 tons of supplies plus millions of tons of fuel. More German troops were captured in North Africa than at Stalingrad. The full weight of the American economy and manpower (130,000,000 population) would not have been deployed against Germany. This means no US bombers striking Germany military production and synthetic fuel plants. Based on the numbers above the Soviets could not win WW2 alone.

@vans2142

3 жыл бұрын

@@Sean-yk8he Do not forget that USSR wasn't prepared for war. They even had armistice with German and were supplying oil. Who tf wouldve guessed their own ally would be crazy, or maybe stupid enough to attack them suddenly like that. USSR power were also spreaded at that time because of its worry against japan near manchuria. In short, German almost got moscow simply because they betrayed their unsuspecting ally, the unprepared USSR. When USSR finally got hold of the situation, they literally beat the german ass in every battle straight up to Berlin, and USSR havent even begun their war industralization yet. On the other hand, german have been preparing since Hitler is in power, and they also got alot of tanks, planes, and supply because of France's surrender. If it were 1 on 1 since the beginning, or USSR had expected war between each other, placed their army in the western part of the country. The german wouldnt even get near Moscow in the first place.

Don't forget Alaska is 80Km from Russia, it's a lot easier to invade Russia than what people think.

@Vis-Light

2 жыл бұрын

Yes but that’s the eastern front of Russia which is basically useless, everything that matters is western Russia and they would have to cross the county to get there from the east which is too far

That lil ukrane part looking real plausible rn

I'm sure none of these comments will be controversial and/or rife with machismo nationalism.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

Cumbayadala cumbuya.

Invading Russia, sounds fun, until you hear your grandpa talking about how it went...

@tylee8055

3 жыл бұрын

German grandpa?

@johnthefishermanjohnhoyle5763

3 жыл бұрын

My grandad said going up Normandy beach in a tank was scary as Fuck. Still got to meet the Soviets in Berlin tho.

@christianohkler1905

3 жыл бұрын

@@tylee8055 Jep

@jonhart7630

3 жыл бұрын

@@christianohkler1905 Those amphibious Shermans were more scary. Most of them sank and there was no way out.

@christianohkler1905

3 жыл бұрын

​@@jonhart7630 Well "amphibious"... Can't really argue with that, I think its hard to compare these things. But it's a sarcastic joke about the thing's I can listen to when my Grandpa talks so..

Poles & Lithuanians: Good luck Napoleon: Ok Hitler: lol

@michealhenstra9948

Жыл бұрын

Poles want to attack and I am pretty sure the Lithuanians want to as well. Napolean didnt know, Hitler attacked to late, and we live in modern times with logistics and heaters and cool shit like that.

As soon as Putin saw an invasion force coming I think he would fire a flurry of nukes

@choonblaze

2 жыл бұрын

That would make it easier for NATO tbh. NATO revealed recently, they can easily nuke Moscow under 60 seconds

@cesarsaldana8640

2 жыл бұрын

@@choonblaze not they can’t they weak

@jamesg9468

Жыл бұрын

@@cesarsaldana8640 Russia launches 1 nuke, and they no longer exist as a nation. They have nukes pointed at them from every direction of the globe.

Russia is big, there is a lot of land, there is enough space for everyone. We are not greedy, we will allocate each participant in the attack a plot of 2 meters in length, 1 meter in width and 2 meters in depth. Welcome, aggressors))

@harveydogcognito2790

3 жыл бұрын

If america will invade russia it should only invade those near us allies and capture cities that it could hold

@davidpadilla9468

3 жыл бұрын

America has the industry based power the knowledge and the manpower something Germany nevered had . Imagine if Germany had the b17

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

Hah! I like your style and admire your pluck, Ruskie. Peace and good will from Texas.

@kubrachu8562

3 жыл бұрын

@@Grenadier311 And to you wishes of peace from us. We ordinary people have nothing to share. Greetings from the Caucasus

@jonhart7630

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidpadilla9468 Germany invaded Russia with 3 million men. America would never get an army that size to invade Russia. Genghis Khan is the only Aggressor to conquer Russia and he conquered the other 2 world powers at the same time: China and Persia.

Fun fact! Russia has defeat Russia more than any other country.

@hx20games77

3 жыл бұрын

Your saying the cold war

@guten7964

2 жыл бұрын

Да

@dmitriyventurer4902

2 жыл бұрын

So true!

@irondeed5225

2 жыл бұрын

Fun fact Russia defeated usa twice even with back up , 1. NK 2. at the Russian border but then ran away.

@mgastudios5076

2 жыл бұрын

@@irondeed5225 Russia never sent troops to NK

If the people of Russia all decided to vote for U.S. statehood, the U.S. would be crazy to even entertain the thought. The U.S. has almost no use for Russia, the oil would be nice, but the headache wouldn't be worth it.

@softdrink-0

2 жыл бұрын

Plus congress would almost definitely veto it

@cparker7992

2 жыл бұрын

@@softdrink-0 I don't know, what is their population compared to our current territories? A lot of them would enter as blue or purple or even swing states, while Russia would likely balance it with several red states (we'd of course break them apart for easier governance, probably roughly into their current internal borders). Historically, states have entered in groups to balance expected voting blocks. Bringing Russians in could be the key to getting Puerto Rico admitted, finally.

@augusto8821

2 жыл бұрын

You are right, why should the USA invade a corrupt 3rd world country?

@Stephen-cr3sc

2 жыл бұрын

@@augusto8821 ......Absolutely! If we want the cheap thrill of corruption, just join the Republican party!!!

American could not not invade Russia, just like Russia could not invade America. We would all lose

Yes they can but only in dreams and Hollywood movies

@MuhammadMoss722

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@austinlowrance5943

3 жыл бұрын

Awww are the American haters coming out 🧻 here these are for your tears 😢

@austinlowrance5943

3 жыл бұрын

I mean I get it if I spent a century trying to catch up to someone and they still beat me I would be salty too but I don't know what that's like

@arismaiden6457

3 жыл бұрын

@@austinlowrance5943 easy there uncle Sam, real world isn't Rambo 3 😆

@bozzie7718

3 жыл бұрын

@@arismaiden6457 America 6000 nukes everyone else not even close there is only one super power. These countries wouldn’t stand a chance

USA: RELEASE THE FLORIDA MAN!!! Russia: The WHAT?!?

@slavicstraightchad3855

3 жыл бұрын

Russia: RELEASE THE STALINGRAD MAN!!!

@ibrahimcehajic

3 жыл бұрын

Florida mans high on pcp armed with gators god help us all.

@slavicstraightchad3855

3 жыл бұрын

Stalingrad man strong smart God,Christus and Maria help only human's God save Europa

@slavicstraightchad3855

3 жыл бұрын

@Mario Orellana Putin: take it Russian Citizens: thank's for the 634.000 T34

@Medgator

3 жыл бұрын

BFG devision plays

This guy somehow predicted the ukraine conflict

@LSmoney215

Ай бұрын

Because the way started in 2014. It was only a ceasefire

This video aged poorly Yet again, its 2020, not 2022

America can't invade Russia. Russia also can't invade America. They're just too good for each other.

@jblob5764

3 жыл бұрын

Same with china at this point. The 3 just cant feasibly "win" a war China knows that and that's why they will do whatever the hell they want in the seas nearby because they're aware we cant actually do anything but complain

@sylvainduret9880

3 жыл бұрын

Stupide : take time but nothing impossible.

@justicethedoggo3648

3 жыл бұрын

@@jblob5764 but a war in third country or 3 battleground . The US will win . For example in South China sea

@gabenewell3955

3 жыл бұрын

@@justicethedoggo3648 no we won’t

@wolfsden6479

3 жыл бұрын

@@jblob5764 exept russia and the US are very much self supported with food and fuel, China not so much. So a blockade can slowly starve them. Although they are trying to change this.

Biden could just challenge Putin to a push-up contest XD

@makeromaniagreatagain9697

3 жыл бұрын

@Lightning Kaiser that's why it'd be so funny

@joemamaobama6863

3 жыл бұрын

@@makeromaniagreatagain9697 bruh

@krishnakolipramanik2877

3 жыл бұрын

Plank

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

Hehe. We should go back to the days when our leaders sent champions to decide the day in single combat. Should we send Chuck Norris's clone from his 80's DNA sample or Butterbean into the fray?

@makeromaniagreatagain9697

2 жыл бұрын

@Alpha it's a meme

Lol one year later, here we are watching the conflict in Ukraine unfold… what’s next.

@neloverg3774

2 жыл бұрын

Spoiler alert: Taiwan

Very nice presentation .💯👌thanks.

US invade Russian. Napoleon and Axis Germany: They learn nothing.

@ushopelife7538

3 жыл бұрын

Allies NATO United Nation Western Power & Axis CSTO BRICS Eastern Power Defectors Final Target Invasion /Final Invasion Target Operation Downfall 2:57 3:06 3:13 3:48 4:31 4:48 4:58 5:56.6:00 6:12 6:18 6:29 7:04 7:43 8:02 8:12 8:30 8:56-9:02 9:14-9:19-9:27 9:39-9:41-9:45-,:48-9:57-9:59 10:01-10:04-10:07-10:13-10:18-10:26-10:38-10:44,10:47-10:51-10:57-11:01-11:14,11:19-11:23-11:26-11:30-11:43,11:45,11:47-11:55-11:58-12:02-12:20-12:33-12:46-13:13,13:21,13:38,13:48,13:53,13:56,14:03,14:10,14:16,14:25,14:33-14:38,14:46,14:52,14:55-14:59-15:08-15:16-15:29-15:40,15:43,15:53,16:15,16:18,16:34,16:37,16:43,16:54,16:55,17:09,17:14,17:18,17:22,17:25,18:11

Next video should be NATO vs Russia, China, and North Korea

@MirGip

3 жыл бұрын

It's already was in Vietnam - NATO sucks :)

Russia has long and mid range mobile cruise missiles + satellites... you can forget about surprise attack or getting aircraft carriers in range for planes to take off.

@joeae6297

2 жыл бұрын

@Robert Bradshaw; that's a silly analysis. I don't think Russia loses sleep over those US toys in the black sea. They will be fried /gone/kaput in the first 5minutes of the war. The Baltic countries of Lituania, Slovenia and Latvia will fall in the first 24hours or 12hour even and Poland's north east will be surrounded almost as Russia is already positioned in Belarus and at the centre of Europe at Kaliningrad within shooting distance of Germany and all of Europe. It would be madness indeed to try a war with Russia.

You know that Turkey is in Nato with the US right? They have no problem to get into the black sea if they wanted to.

@whateveryousaygroomer131

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah that's what I said. The entire EU couldn't keep us out of the black sea if we really wanted to be there, not that they would try and stop us from posting up our navel fleets there. Also Russia has the GDP of the state of Florida, they cannot financially support a large scale war for long.

@bigola5437

2 жыл бұрын

Yea but turkey and usa not in good terms usa dosent show respect to turkey dosent let turkey buy weapons from them turkey now builds it own weapons like drones and mini submarines etc etc

@whateveryousaygroomer131

2 жыл бұрын

@@bigola5437 Thats not the point. The point is is Turkey won't be able to stop the US from going to the black see. They are unable to and wouldn't because we are allies and has received massive amounts of funding from the US through NATO.

@bigola5437

2 жыл бұрын

@@whateveryousaygroomer131 yes they can they have the right to do this it’s a agreement turkey controls it they say who come and who leaves

The Russian people haven't even fully conquered Russia... Seriously there are still places to explore there, in vast Siberia.

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@Dimitry Chernoff has☆ 8,000 missiles, Ivan. Russia isn't entirely composed of missiles, is she? That's like saying that America is 10,000 McDonald's, meaning that that fast food restaurants are the sum total of our existence. There's at least a few large bears, some pretty women and half a hundred million vodka chugging drunkards there too, right?

@user-ox3bp4rz3n

3 жыл бұрын

@@Grenadier311 For your information, in Russia they drink less than, for example, in Germany or France! It's a myth that we're all alcoholics. In Russia, many people do not drink at all, me for example. P.S. - I understand that you said this in jest, but since this topic is often joked about, I will post this link here: www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/05/09/where-global-alcohol-consumption-is-rising-falling-infographic/?sh=4f64aac416e4

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-ox3bp4rz3n Yeah, I was joking and giving Mr. Missiles a hard time because he was aiming them at my country. I did read, to my surprise, some time ago that Russians weren't even in the top 10 of nations in terms of alcohol consumption per capita. Perhaps I shouldn't indulge in proliferating stereotypes when I know that they aren't precisely accurate. That being said, I respect and admire the Russian people, aside from the trolls who persistently trash my country. It's still a post cold-war battle for hearts and minds, of course. I hope that someday soon we can overcome the divide tptb have erected between us. We have more in common than we differ, I believe, especially when measured against non-European founded nations. Peace, and be healthy.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n

3 жыл бұрын

@@Grenadier311 Hello, Grenadier 22!) The Russians are good to the American people. We have conflicts with the government ... and it's not for nothing. Yesterday I left here very detailed information about US policy. But these are big comments, if you're interested, I can copy them here so you can understand what's going on in terms of Russian thinking. But this can be said to be an article, in terms of volume. If you're interested, I'll send you an answer.

@MrRobokoper

3 жыл бұрын

@@Grenadier311 The Modern Western propaganda become today more extreme to dehumanise Russia as was our old enemies in those days. Im half Russian and the time will come for revenge! The taliban will are a kids in comparison to us !!!

Instead Biden & Putin can have a boxing match

@danielcannon3511

3 жыл бұрын

I would love that!

@lanceheaps581

3 жыл бұрын

Putin wins first round knockout. That assumes dementia Joe could actually figure out how to get to the ring.

@MR.Fireblade1097

3 жыл бұрын

Biden would knock down himself before he sees putin in the ring

Fascinating Analysis. Thank You!

Ah yes the hypothetical scenario where Russia officially deploys troops into eastern Ukraine Ha ha that’s so crazy that’d never happen

*Winter* : when do i come in?

Napoleon and Hitler in the background: “Don’t”

@akiamini4006

2 жыл бұрын

Dont forget swedish empire

@felixgutierrez993

2 жыл бұрын

To be fair Napoleon made it but didn't fully consider...ok...What now?

@mgastudios5076

2 жыл бұрын

@@felixgutierrez993 true. He did conquer moscow, but the Russian government had a scorched earth policy in place so his troops could not live off the land and quickly attack the enemy.

@eli4984

2 жыл бұрын

@@mgastudios5076 and all they did was retreat and fortify napoleons #1 weakness

Lol imagine if Russia invaded Ukraine

@justind-m524

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah that’d be crazy lol

@alexsmart5452

2 жыл бұрын

and with all its military might got bogged down, with high causality rates and a massive loss of equipment in the first couple of days, by an outnumbered and outgunned Ukrainian army..no that wont happen, Russia is a STRONG military power. go thing it has nukes or Lithuania might conquer it.

@ZioStalin

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexsmart5452 Lol.. straight from the CNN? You westerners shouldn't believe the bullshit they're telling you, it'll be the cringiest of cringe moments when you'll realise Russia has already won.

Why would the United States go through the Atlantic Ocean and not the Pacific Ocean to get to Russia

@Orghoroth

2 жыл бұрын

Cause of all the main targets are in the west part

@Mikelo220

2 жыл бұрын

Because who cares about invading Siberia? All population centers, and the center of government, are in the western side of country.

Don't even think about it. Lets all be friends :)

Please do the following: * 🇺🇸 USA vs. 🇪🇺 EU * 🇨🇳 China vs. 🇵🇭🇲🇨🇲🇾🇸🇬🇧🇳🇻🇳🇹🇭🇰🇭🇱🇦🇲🇲 ASEAN

@poplar6658

3 жыл бұрын

EU VS ASEAN

@ethansaporsky6958

3 жыл бұрын

He already did USA vs EU

@trekkienzl2862

3 жыл бұрын

@@ethansaporsky6958 No he didn't. He only did US vs. UK. It's not on his channel.

@Tommy-en3dp

3 жыл бұрын

None of the Southeast Asian countries can enter the top 10 military forces, and the number of troops can be superposed, but the military science and technology can not be superposed. China may have more troops than southeast Asia put together, and China ranks third in the world in military science and technology. So it's obvious

Back in the real world etc…. The problem with hypothetical scenarios like this is that sometimes reality catches up with fantasy and pushes it into a ditch. How do we evaluate the Russian Army and Air Force after seeing them being ground down over the last six weeks by the Ukrainians? I’m willing to speculate that the average Russian ratnik would fight a lot harder defending his homeland but if he’s being led by the same General staff that planned the invasion of the Ukraine then the Russians are toast.

@edwhatshisname3562

2 жыл бұрын

Agreed. It would be interesting to see an updated version of this scenario.

@felixprime8291

Жыл бұрын

I think most Russians would be still be pretty apathetic if the US was invading. So I apart from a hardcore of nationalists I don't think there would be so much difference in morale/committment.

hmmmmm that didn't age well

It's funny how people call Binkov both "Russian propaganda" and "American propaganda" at the same time.

@davidnemoseck9007

3 жыл бұрын

I think he actually tries to to be fair when he does these.

@brookswashere4661

3 жыл бұрын

But the Russian propaganda is winning in the comments Russian troll will take notice in a while just ignore then they have bad day eveyday

try it! Hitler and Napoleon have previously tried

@MrJinglejanglejingle

3 жыл бұрын

Though, they lacked the technology we have today... And they also didn't outnumber Russia's entire military 2-to-1, and have twice as much populace.

@andrewlvov5535

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrJinglejanglejingle the Hitlers generals had same thought...

@MrJinglejanglejingle

3 жыл бұрын

@@andrewlvov5535 Not particularly, no. Similar thoughts? Yes. Backed up by incorrect info? Indeed. However, technology these days is... A smattering more accurate than back then, wouldn't you say, chum?

@andrewlvov5535

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrJinglejanglejingle for a mass war, and the conflict between Russia and the United States will be like this, the accuracy of technology will not play anyl role. Russia is not Iraq or Libya. About the losses of the USSR during the war. You probably don't know that out of 27 million direct losses, the military is only 9-10 million, the remaining 17-18 million are civilians who perished, tortured to death in concentration camps, who died of hunger, burned by retreating Wehrmacht units, bombed by the Luftwaffe. Moreover, the direct military losses of Germany are also estimated at 8-9 million soldiers, these losses do not include the allies, SS troops and SS legions. Something like this. the ratio of 2 to 1 is a myth of the Cold War and losing wermacht generals. In Russia says about it - a bad dancer always blames his balls

@yaz2928

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrJinglejanglejingle Operation Barbarossa where Germans at 5.2 million initially outnumbered 2 million Soviet defenders. It took a year before Soviets outnumbered Germans.

Russia can't get air superiority vs ukraine, good luck vs USA LOL

In short, sure. A longer answer might ask why. Russia is large, muddy, cold and without redeeming qualities and is scheduled to decompose in a decade.

@TheFinnmacool

2 жыл бұрын

Decompose in a decade? LOLOLOL! Well according to Al Gore the US will be underwater but that hasn't stopped Obama from buying a seaside mansion!

@jamesjacocks6221

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheFinnmacool What are you trying so unsuccessfully to say? Is there a gem of understanding in your random disputable statement?

That thumbnail's gonna cause some-- *Looks down in the comment section* Yeah, it already has.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n

3 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Guldager First-Europe would not have had time to respond, as it is very close). Secondly.. well, yes, we would not immediately attack with nuclear weapons.. and we would fight normally, but if the war became disastrous for us, we would destroy all of them. Putin has made it clear that without us, there will be no world ;)

@user-ox3bp4rz3n

3 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Guldager That's right, we are not the United States to attack with atomic weapons those who do not pose a mortal danger to us.

@user-ox3bp4rz3n

3 жыл бұрын

@Lucas Guldager But in Russia there is one system that I would like to inform you about, it is called "Perimeter" or "Dead Hand". This is an automated system located all over the country (Russia), consisting of a huge number of sensors and computers, which constantly analyzes many parameters offline. Checks seismic activity across the country and other indicators. And if someone organizes a massive attack with the use of nuclear weapons on the territory of Russia, then even if all the people are destroyed, this system will autonomously give the command for a massive retaliatory strike. And from all the surviving underground mines, submarines, ships, etc., nuclear missiles will be fired. That is why it is called the "Dead Hand" according to the NATO classification, because even if all the people were killed, the retaliatory strike would still destroy all the enemies.

This will never happen as it would be a suicidal mission. As Napoleon correctly noted when he attacked Russia, the more you advance the more the country opens up like a funnel.

@oattyrant2035

3 жыл бұрын

Only if America tried to rush the war

@kinderboeken55

3 жыл бұрын

@@oattyrant2035 it couldnt russia is simply to big

@zinnsoldat6493

3 жыл бұрын

Russia isn't a big deal .The problem is that they have the largest nuclear arsenal in the world .

@oattyrant2035

3 жыл бұрын

@@kinderboeken55 bs nothing is too big to conquer its just America doesn't like tough things

@kinderboeken55

3 жыл бұрын

@@oattyrant2035 so why dont you conquer it cyka

Looking back at this with 2022 eyes is amazing.

0:23 Binkov' crystal ball never disappoints

I don't think you could convince the US army that this was a just cause. On the other hand, the Russian army would be fighting to the bitter end. Morale plays a role.

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

I refuse to believe that the us military, which features mostly southern Americans as its troops, would not be convinced of the idea of ending the biggest threat to Europe, their allies The fervor would need a kick sure, but to do it? Yeah Fighting germany at the time in 1941 wasn’t necessarily a just cause beyond having war declared, which is similar to here

@sebastianbratu1502

3 жыл бұрын

How about now, do you still think it's morally bad, when Rusdia has 110k troops massed at the border?

@combatantezoteric2965

3 жыл бұрын

I hate russia

@looinrims

3 жыл бұрын

@@combatantezoteric2965 as everyone should You shouldn’t like anyone who imprisons political opponents (ie tyrants)

@myopicthunder

3 жыл бұрын

@@looinrims Julian Assange says hi and Chelsea Manning

Putin's reaction: His time against Napoleon and Hitler to two

@gilgamesh_9119

3 жыл бұрын

only: 1) Napoleon made Russia burn half of its country with their own hands, including their CAPITAL not exactly a victory for Russia either 2) Hitler was heavy fighting on multiple fronts and Russia was heavily helped by the US Lend-Lease program 3) Mongols? conclusion: Russian invincibility is a myth :)

@muhammadrifanhermawan6649

3 жыл бұрын

@@gilgamesh_9119 ivan iv: isn't it obvious if i was born in Mongol's heyday it would have been otherwise

@muhammadrifanhermawan6649

3 жыл бұрын

@@gilgamesh_9119 1).Napoleon lost the war with Russia due to the deadly winter plus the scorched earth trick of the countryside, leaving the enemy without shelter during a storm. 2) .Hitlers in Operation Barbarossa are more focused on attacking Russia because Hitler knows that the movement of weak allied troops is not a big threat, while the Red Army continues to attack and in large numbers

@muhammadrullihermawan2264

3 жыл бұрын

@@muhammadrifanhermawan6649 that's a plausible theory

@gilgamesh_9119

3 жыл бұрын

@@muhammadrifanhermawan6649 nah

Well done I respect your ability and understanding of course there’s always a wildcard or gambit and also the invisible or unseen factor and variables

Invading Russia is easy, many have done it in the past. Going in was never the problem, getting out has always been the big problem...

@hailarwotanaz5848

2 жыл бұрын

Russia doesn’t have the population to do that anymore. It’s actually been decreasing steadily since the 90’s

@agboemmanuel8551

2 жыл бұрын

Ur comment is based on ussr

@startingbark0356

2 жыл бұрын

@@hailarwotanaz5848 and the US population is rapidly turning into stickmen snowflakes

@douglassantet647

2 жыл бұрын

@@agboemmanuel8551 nothing has changed Russians aren't any less resolved to protect their country

Does Biden even remember what Russia even is ?

@bluntforcetrauma8192

3 жыл бұрын

Come on man! You know the thing!

Genghis Khan, Napoleon, and Hitler: Good luck bro

@Zeta_Reticulum

3 жыл бұрын

and in every case russia was the country with the bigger population. This time it is 2:1 for the USA. Let's begin....

@salahddinebensebane8429

3 жыл бұрын

Genghis Khan won in his war agents the rus

Wow the 1st 30 seconds of this sound different today.

Next video could the Russian military even make it halfway to Alaska?

@XanthosAcanthus

2 жыл бұрын

Dunno. Alaska has like 17 people who could probably hold them off.

If US will ever think of invading Russia, first thinks about what happened to Napoleon and Hitler. ~Love from India 🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺

@diegorodriguez4252

2 жыл бұрын

Mongols invaded. Others have too and been successful.

@kurtmontgomery9719

2 жыл бұрын

@@diegorodriguez4252 no only the Mongols were able to invade and successfully hold territory.

@WalkerSoc

2 жыл бұрын

@احمد ضياء they were the largest land empire to exist

@dmitriyventurer4902

2 жыл бұрын

@@diegorodriguez4252 who was successful and why they aren’t in Russia anymore? Nobody could conquer Russia! Nobody! Russia was as small as Florida 1.000 years ago and after each invasion it became double bigger. Nowadays Russia is the biggest country in the world just because Sweden, Poland, Germany, France, Turkey and others had tried to invade it and as a result lost their territories.

@mgastudios5076

2 жыл бұрын

@@WalkerSoc British empire was the largest

It’s been reported by several sources the us has far more than a few thousand tanks. However, first lesson from history is to not invade Russia if you can’t supply your troops. The greatest invasions of Russia by Napoleon and Germany showed that supplies were the main issue. This is an area where the USA excels however before invading such a massive country it would be a good idea to expand the military

@darkliter7

3 жыл бұрын

The U.S. are too divided to draft anyone at this time it would have sabotageurs in every branch as angry as our own citizens are... And why risk a nuclear doomsday scenario with mutual destruction???

@nicholascastellano5106

3 жыл бұрын

@@darkliter7 because I don’t think Putin actually wants masses of his people to die. Sure, political opponents send an assassin their way or poison their food. But for the masses I don’t think even he could stomach millions dying by his actions. The threat of nuclear weapons were always just a shallow threat because no one actually could stomach the idea of using them on a massive scale. I think a draft would have some success in the USA IF they could successfully pull off unification through a common enemy. It happened in Afghanistan against the soviets when the various tribes had been killing each other, so it’s not impossible.

@warcrimeenjoyer219

3 жыл бұрын

@@darkliter7 division between Americans would not be a problem if you go back to fdr second term this was the closest American has come to having another civil war and when we finally went to war most Americans put everything behind them and United

@brentjaynumbaddo478

3 жыл бұрын

@Nasty GirlXD well if you invade you will defeat as napoleon and adolf hitler

@jonhart7630

3 жыл бұрын

America has 25.000 soldiers in Europe. The Russian Western Battle Group has 150.000 soldiers. By the time America is sending in reinforcements, the Russians would be drinking vodka in Berlin.

I really like thay outro : ) ♡

I want an up to date version of this video

Could China and Russia conquer Europe without US help

@jesterknight3837

3 жыл бұрын

Russia can conquer Europe in a week LOL

@Grenadier311

3 жыл бұрын

@@jesterknight3837 Not true. Europe sans Russia boasts three times the population, ten times the GDP and still has about thrice the manpower Russia does. They've gone a bit soft, but aren't that big of a pushover. Russia could take Poland in a week one on one - maybe.

USA would lose simply because their supply lines are too long and it would take a lot of time to reach Russian frontlines and in that time that USA is reaching Russian frontlines Russia would have already mobilized its whole military

@duurnamets9678

3 жыл бұрын

And his nucliair missiles send to US

@Chris-vs4wt

3 жыл бұрын

Not if we went through Alaska.

@mustafarami8424

3 жыл бұрын

@@Chris-vs4wt you will have to pass through Canada and that would take time russia would have a force ready there already and this force would be enough to defend against the invading US force until more Russian forces arrive basically it will be d-day 2

@Chris-vs4wt

3 жыл бұрын

@@mustafarami8424 There are plenty of Air Force bases in Alaska. They could soften up the Russian forces and soldiers could come from the Aleutian Islands and mainland Alaska.

@mustafarami8424

3 жыл бұрын

@@Chris-vs4wt but those are low numbers I think and air defenses are modern but let’s be honest here Russia and America won’t fight so let’s stop wasting time

Whatever happens, Russia has proven that they are at least 20 years behind. Kinda funny.

Nobody can invade or conquer Russia. Ask Napoleon or Hitler 😂

Napoleon and Hitler thought they could win but we know what happened.

@garyvahl7658

3 жыл бұрын

@United Afrika Government and the Swedes.

@bitterballs356

3 жыл бұрын

@@Winston.S.Churchill he fought against a very small and disunited Russia it's just stupid to bring him up when there was not Russia at the time

@garyvahl7658

3 жыл бұрын

@Vinlon Voss different century but still the same grave yard

@garyvahl7658

3 жыл бұрын

@Vinlon Vossthe problem any army has with invading a country so vast is where does it stop? Lines of logistics and occupation forces in occupied territory will diminish the advance force numbers.

@garyvahl7658

3 жыл бұрын

@Vinlon Voss then it will be nuclear war. The Russians will not accept defeat.

The next war you should simulate should be the coming American Civil War.

@blastermike_sd70ace80

3 жыл бұрын

All liberals dead before lunch. A 10 second episode wouldn't be very popular.

@marcopolo2395

3 жыл бұрын

Liberals will die from soy overconsumption

This aged well lmao