Chronograph or Three Hander? (Omega Chronoscope vs Omega CK859)
Omega CK859
511.12.39.21.99.002
39mm case
12mm thick
46.2mm lug to lug
20mm lug width
30m water resistance
Manual Cal. 8926 w/ 72 hour power reserve
• Omega CK859
Omega Chronoscope
329.30.43.51.02.001
42.9mm case
13.4mm thick
48.3mm lug to lug
21mm lug width
50m water resistance
Cal. 9908 w/ 60 hours power reserve
• Omega Chronoscope - Si...
Пікірлер: 12
The CK is beautiful, Simple classic Design.
@brentmillertime8778
Жыл бұрын
Couldn't agree more, thanks for viewing!
Thank you Brad for this episode, nice question, I always go to clean dial 3 or 2 hands No chrono No complications No date 😎
Perspective is amazing … I love the chrono and I find that CK so boring
I like three hand too.. so symmetric
I love the small second 3 hands more than the chronograph, that would be an ideal single collection for me ☺️.
@brentmillertime8778
Жыл бұрын
We just got one more CK859 in stock. Will likely be our last one since they have already discontinued it.
IF a 1 watch collection is the goal and IF it's just between these 2 then a 3 hander.
Ck! ❤️
I bought the CK859. I love it and wanted to get one for my brother. Unfortunately, my AD said they are no longer accepting orders as it’s been discontinued.
That Omega Sector should have been 38mm and 100 WR. Hard pass but stunning otherwise.
I'm amused that you found one of the busiest three hand dials as an example. For work I don't mind busy dials but for time off I find a simpler dial makes for less hectic viewing. I'd almost say two hander for a weekend watch so I don't have to constantly be reminded of the pace of time slipping away. That said I have a few speedmasters on my wishlist. I'm just not sure I'd ever make use of the complication.