Christine Korsgaard - Ethics & Morality - Extended

Christine M. Korsgaard is one of the most influential moral philosophers of our time. She combines highly original philosophical arguments with insightful work on the history of ethics. Her work concerns the foundations of moral obligation, practical reason, agency, and Kant's and Kantian ethics. Her contributions have been groundbreaking in all these areas.
Produced by - Sensu Science
Commissioned by - University of Groningen
Director - Jesper Buijvoets
Producer - Caspar de Zeeuw
Interviewer - Nyckle Swierstra
D.o.p. - Walker Pachler
Sound Recordist - Caspar de Zeeuw
Editor - Jesper Buijvoets
Sound Design - Jesper Buijvoets
Sound Mastering - Kudo Studio
Soundtrack: Aaron Ximm -- Spring Rain

Пікірлер: 10

  • @HighlyShifty
    @HighlyShifty3 жыл бұрын

    Absolutely fascinating, Professor Korsgaard is one of the great living philosophers

  • @tahnevanwonderen9628
    @tahnevanwonderen962810 жыл бұрын

    I have been wanting to see an interview like this with Korsgaard for quite some time! This is great! Thanks!

  • @timrputnam
    @timrputnam7 жыл бұрын

    This is great, thank you for sharing and to Christine for doing the piece.

  • @vinestreet4031
    @vinestreet40314 жыл бұрын

    I would argue that dogs think normatively too.

  • @talyemmanuela

    @talyemmanuela

    3 жыл бұрын

    'am I a good boy?'

  • @vagevuur6618

    @vagevuur6618

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@talyemmanuela That's gold.

  • @julieisamoogle82

    @julieisamoogle82

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@talyemmanuela I feel like dogs subscribe to emotivism more than anything

  • @mitchellkato1436
    @mitchellkato14364 жыл бұрын

    I am a modern epistemological philosopher. Therefore my appreciation of Aristotle is weak. Especially his empirical stand is annoying (as opposed to empiricist who made a point that all knowledge came from experience.). The modern philosophers will still survive, even though philosophy has become a social web (a community).

  • @mac1414

    @mac1414

    4 жыл бұрын

    Aristotle was largely revisited by the rise of modal logic by Saul Kripke (essentialism) and his Naming and Necessity. Its now become clear why Aristotle isn't entirely useless.

  • @mitchellkato1436

    @mitchellkato1436

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@mac1414 I guess I wanted to make the distinction between empiricist and empirical. empiricist claims that ALL knowledge are gain by experience. Locke (who is an empiricist) claimed tabula rusa. There is nothing in the mind that didn't come from experience. The empirical philosophers on the other hand, claim only some knowledge are from experience. Aristotle had his logic (which are not from experience and they are deductive) but Aristotle also had, for example, ethics which comes from experience which are not deductive from modern understanding.