Christian Shocked When Rabbi Tovia Singer Defends Unitarians While Teaching Torah

Help us combat aggressive Jewish evangelism in Israel: outreachjudaism.org/partners/
Let’s Get Biblical Study Guide (Volume 1 & 2) outreachjudaism.org/shop/lets...
Tom Huszti at Unitarian Anabaptist, affiliated with the Unitarian Christian Alliance
outreachjudaism.org/
www.videvo.net
Music: www.purple-planet.com
www.toviasinger.tv/
#toviasinger #Judaism #Christianity #Messiah

Пікірлер: 648

  • @chriskaleisgtbarbados8823
    @chriskaleisgtbarbados882311 ай бұрын

    Excellent teaching Rabbi. Thank you Rabbi.

  • @tarkinuchiha1768
    @tarkinuchiha17683 ай бұрын

    Bless you Abraham 🙏🏻

  • @ronbazaar
    @ronbazaar11 ай бұрын

    Despite being a Muslim, I've always enjoy your program and I've subscribed and always like your informative videos where I learned a lot of things about religion. Thank you Rabbi Singer, may God bless you always.

  • @antoniopadro1760

    @antoniopadro1760

    11 ай бұрын

    Do you believe there can be 2 religions that are truth for example the Jewish belief and the Muslim belief

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760Well you never know, or we can both be wrong that’s also a possibility after all we’re only humans.

  • @januargumelar3495

    @januargumelar3495

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760 of course no. But Judaism and Islam are closest to and most similar to each other compared to any other religions. NB: I'm a Muslim.

  • @sissy9393

    @sissy9393

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760The entire truth? Or leading to the truth?

  • @antoniopadro1760

    @antoniopadro1760

    11 ай бұрын

    @@januargumelar3495 Judaism and islam are not close not by a long shot buddy. Islam members try to disprove Judaism to make Islam relevant. Judaism doesnt believe in the made up jesus story Islam does. Judaism god didn't forgive Adam Islam believe God forgave Adam Judaism teaches that god can use sinners as prophets/messengers. Islam teaches God doesn't use sinners as prophet/messengers. And many more so no Judaism and Islam are not close in anything

  • @haemeth42
    @haemeth4211 ай бұрын

    Baruch HaShem for His wisdom is manifested in you Rabbi

  • @LoreneRaeWard
    @LoreneRaeWard11 ай бұрын

    I feel blessed to have the opportunity to listen and learn from you; I ❤ this!

  • @b.b.309
    @b.b.30911 ай бұрын

    This is so interesting dear rabbi tovia🌷🌷 Hashem breath the tora in to you this is amazing 🌷🌷

  • @LoveYourNeighbor2
    @LoveYourNeighbor211 ай бұрын

    I respectfully ask Christians to STOP calling the Torah the “Old Testament”. It’s so insulting to the Jewish people and disrespectful to Hashem who gave the holy Torah to mankind for all eternity

  • @sitresjolie2343

    @sitresjolie2343

    11 ай бұрын

    Agreed! ✡️❤️

  • @RoseSharon7777

    @RoseSharon7777

    11 ай бұрын

    I think they do that because God said he was going to make a NEW covenant with the house of Judah and House of Israel in Jeremiah 31.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@RoseSharon7777yeah a new covenant with us Jews. Not anything the christians are thinking

  • @wizolufa1452

    @wizolufa1452

    11 ай бұрын

    It’s all fairy tales, so it is what it is. But I agree with you

  • @paulmoore-LPC-LMFT-NCC

    @paulmoore-LPC-LMFT-NCC

    11 ай бұрын

    Some of us are trying to learn appropriate terms.

  • @haemeth42
    @haemeth4211 ай бұрын

    Thanks!

  • @ashleychilson8790
    @ashleychilson879011 ай бұрын

    I have always wondered about the identity of Malcizdek! Thank you for your wonderful teachings as always Rabbi Singer. And thank you too Tom!

  • @GilbertGreich
    @GilbertGreich11 ай бұрын

    Todah Rabba!

  • @zilpah9890
    @zilpah989011 ай бұрын

    I never new that Malkitzedek was Shem !! Thanks it makes so much sense

  • @elizabethbooth5446
    @elizabethbooth544611 ай бұрын

    Thank you rabbi

  • @mdevorah6833
    @mdevorah683310 ай бұрын

    Todah rabba. I learned tons on the historical side of my Judaism with this.

  • @etzelkaplan9677
    @etzelkaplan967711 ай бұрын

    remember rabbis allow jews to pray inside any mosque [monotheism]. but never inside a church [trinity]. monotheism is the greatest command

  • @januargumelar3495

    @januargumelar3495

    11 ай бұрын

    Exception: Unitarian churches

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@januargumelar3495Even Unitarian churches they can’t go in.

  • @januargumelar3495

    @januargumelar3495

    11 ай бұрын

    @@abc_6 No. I am a Muslim, but I know that Jews have no issue entering a Unitarian church when necessary.

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@januargumelar3495 Many Unitarian Churches have depictions of the Apostles and So-called Jesus inside, see for yourself. And that cross symbol is an abomination to every Jew so again I don’t think they can go inside.

  • @Avishai-rx3py
    @Avishai-rx3py11 ай бұрын

    Yes Hinduism at its core written in their ancient vedas teaches that their is only 1 G-d and not to worship wood, fire, air, or anything above or below. Only in later writings did other ideas such as caste and many G-d’s appear.

  • @theduncansheik

    @theduncansheik

    11 ай бұрын

    exactly

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    yes i have many quotes on that, but yet you still see them worshipping 700 million Gods! Hindus started deviating and following Smirthis (Words of men) instead of Shrutis (Word of God)...Furthermore caste discrimination only allows Brahmin caste to read the scriptures, further drowning them into ignorance!

  • @ruthyk7083

    @ruthyk7083

    11 ай бұрын

    I've heard India is skewing more source based.

  • @VandalIO

    @VandalIO

    11 ай бұрын

    Exactly like Christianity … initially they believed in one true god of Abraham and later at Christian councils they decided to include 2 more gods and maybe in future they might have more councils to include other gods

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    @@fidelcatsro6948 Yes.Excellent point.

  • @sachinparmar1396
    @sachinparmar139610 ай бұрын

    Thank you!!!!

  • @nonewmsgs
    @nonewmsgs11 ай бұрын

    great stuff

  • @Daniel.Griffith
    @Daniel.Griffith11 ай бұрын

    Happy Thursday Rabbi!

  • @laylaali5977
    @laylaali597710 ай бұрын

    Excellent conversation

  • @fidelcatsro6948
    @fidelcatsro694811 ай бұрын

    No more excuse for trinity!! It only exists in Burger King, Heavenly Whopper, Divine Fries and Holy Sprite and those three are One!

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    @@james-yf9wm naaah youre twisting my scripture like Uncle Paul

  • @zaze8376

    @zaze8376

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@james-yf9wmwhy are you so jelly? Because Muslims reject the false claims about Jesus?

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    @@james-yf9wm Allah has a face, Allah has hands but its not anything like we can see or imagine with our feeble mortal mind..thats what scholars say

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    @@james-yf9wm Quran says Jesus spoke in defence as a baby on behalf of his mother to the people who accused her of promiscuity, can you show me which Christian Bible or gospel was that copied from???

  • @bruckbedru8178

    @bruckbedru8178

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@james-yf9wm lol, according to your purtanical reading of religious texts, then there is plenty of anthromorphism in judiasm, christianity and Islam. Ironically christianity is built on anthromorphism starting with their conception or image of G-D. The new-testament is collection of anthromorphic essences and substances. If your not that bright you might extrapolate some of the verses in the torah and holy-quran and interpret G-D in anthromorphic nomenclature, that's what christianity turned out to be.

  • @bogbrither
    @bogbrither11 ай бұрын

    Would love to see Rabbi Singer and Dr Jordan Peterson go at it

  • @screamtoasigh9984

    @screamtoasigh9984

    10 ай бұрын

    It really bothered me he did that Exodus series and didn't bother to get Rabbi Singer or Rabbi Skobac on. I'm not taking a series that doesn't have a Rabbi on, and had a bunch of Christians on. Peterson has said Catholicism is "as sane as people can get". He's not ready to be serious. Literally he had the president of the Christian Hillsdale college, a philosophy professor, a Christian apologetic, a Christian; theology/philosophy professor, a Catholic art professor, Ben Shapiro - who is a political commentator/lawyer and Modern Orthodox, Dennis Prager who is a Conservative Jew and political commentator (he wrote the Rational Bible, which is a commentary on Exodus, but it's written to appeal to all religious, another Christian; a philosophy /theology professor at TRINITY college ), and a one of his ex students who is a thriller writer.

  • @ecomandurban7183
    @ecomandurban718311 ай бұрын

    🤗🤗🤗 greetings from Durban Rabbi

  • @NatoshaMarzucco
    @NatoshaMarzucco11 ай бұрын

    Love you, Rabbi. SHALOM TO ISRAEL🇮🇱 Messiah will come soon. 🕊🫶 You'll see and be satisfied.😪

  • @ToviaSinger1

    @ToviaSinger1

    11 ай бұрын

    Thank you so much for your generous support! Shalom

  • @NatoshaMarzucco

    @NatoshaMarzucco

    11 ай бұрын

    @@ToviaSinger1 🇮🇱🕊You're wonderful🇮🇱🕊🇮🇱 Shalom shalom only good things to you and yours🇮🇱🕊🇮🇱🕊💙What a joy to see you:)Rabbi:)💙🕊🇮🇱

  • @user-op6eu3tt9j

    @user-op6eu3tt9j

    11 ай бұрын

    Messah already arrived and churches in almost every town in the civerlized world. Even some jews have converted. Listen if you have ears.

  • @russrussel3947

    @russrussel3947

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@user-op6eu3tt9jcivilized 🤣

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@user-op6eu3tt9j Your hero caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.

  • @HHasan-of2vi
    @HHasan-of2vi10 ай бұрын

    I am Muslim, Rabbi you know very well in Islam we believe all Prophets from Adam to Muhammad[peace be upon them all] were monotheist. Even in Hinduism the fundamental teachings from Vedas [The most secret book] is unity of God.

  • @cat441
    @cat44111 ай бұрын

    Worst thing that happened to Jesus' message was Constantine and creation of the ROMAN catholic meshup; Jesus was a prophet for sure but not a god. Thank you both for sharing this history that we are never told.

  • @LassieSgr

    @LassieSgr

    11 ай бұрын

    Chrisianity started by Rome. There were no protestants for 1,200 years

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    @@LassieSgr True But some of Jesus's earliest followers such as the disciple Peter the apostle Paul and the disciple James were not Catholics.

  • @hyacinthlynch843

    @hyacinthlynch843

    10 ай бұрын

    The worst thing that happened to Yeshua's message was Paul. "Orthodox" Christianity has more to do with the teachings of Paul than Yeshua.

  • @chadstiles113
    @chadstiles11311 ай бұрын

    Could you cover Book of Job as identity of adversary. History of story author and identity of unknown going from role to naming a familar spirit. Love your show. - chad out of lone star state (texas). Be blessed yall!😀

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    "Satan" is the name of a prosecuting angel in the Heavenly Court. Yet some say that he became an independent ruler over a realm of eternal damnation, and that he acts in opposition to God's will - i.e., that he is a separate god. This idolatrous concept is not even a belief in an intermediary, since it claims that Satan is not under God's control.

  • @Noahidescouse
    @Noahidescouse11 ай бұрын

    I Just tried to research melkizedek, I didn't realise I was watching Christians dressed as Jews and calling themselves Rabbi instead of priests, all seems very deceitful to me.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Rashi explains he was Shem the son of Noah.

  • @nitanice
    @nitanice6 ай бұрын

    What an interesting talk! I'm Jewish. I've always thought if someone put a gun to my head to convert to Islam or Christianity, I'd pick Islam. But if my only choice was Christianity, I'd pick Unitarian or Mennonite because in my albeit limited knowledge and interaction with them, they're rational and kind. Interesting to get Rabbi's take and to, yet again, learn. Thank you, Rabbi Singer. 🙂

  • @LassieSgr
    @LassieSgr11 ай бұрын

    Think of how the British use the word House of Lords. Who would think to call them Gods

  • @sissy9393

    @sissy9393

    11 ай бұрын

    That is a very good comment! ❤

  • @Majobri
    @Majobri11 ай бұрын

    People really think jesus could be priest and king? The priests comes from Aaron, Tribe of LEVI. Kings come from David, Tribe of JUDAH. Two different families. Your tribe is based on what tribe your father is from (Numbers 1), therefore you can only have one tribe… Furthermore, if jesus had no human father then BAM he isn’t from either tribe and is not messiah (as messiah comes from direct descent of DAVID, aka TRIBE OF JUDAH) :)

  • @tbishop4961

    @tbishop4961

    11 ай бұрын

    Which tribe was melchizadek?

  • @Majobri

    @Majobri

    11 ай бұрын

    @@tbishop4961 as the Rabbi explained, he was Shem, the son of Noach. Shem told Abraham that he would be fit, as a fellow monotheist, to serve God. This "priesthood", if you will, of serving the One true God was taught allll the way until Moses received the Torah. In which, God designated Aaron and his children to becoming the family of priests over Israel. This is why there was an inauguration service for Aaron, after that time not everyone could claim the title of priest. Therefore, Shem lived before Aaron and did not have a tribe, consequently, Shem being righteous certainly knew that Abraham's descendants, via Aaron, would be worthy of being the permanent priests of Israel. (Aaron comes from Levi).

  • @tbishop4961

    @tbishop4961

    11 ай бұрын

    @@Majobri that was a whole lot of nothing

  • @tbishop4961

    @tbishop4961

    11 ай бұрын

    @Majobri if I didn't have a Bible, it's clear I have internet access. So, I didn't ask you for a lesson in genesis (or in this case midrash). I asked a very simple question, which you skirted

  • @Majobri

    @Majobri

    11 ай бұрын

    @@tbishop4961 its clear you didnt read my reply, the answer is there buddy.

  • @jankompos2330
    @jankompos233011 ай бұрын

    your opinion on orthodox jews,do they exist,or are the named differently? i would really loved a reply to my comment please,toda rabah,shalom

  • @deanticocombar7529
    @deanticocombar752910 ай бұрын

    I wanted to learn more about intresting Judism a true monotheistic faith 👍

  • @Daniel-Tiger
    @Daniel-Tiger4 ай бұрын

    Egypt had the first monotheistic state religion under Akhenaten

  • @Yehonatan613
    @Yehonatan61311 ай бұрын

    King Saul hid behind the vessels and didn't want kingship (1Samuel 10 verse 22), King David says to Saul "but who am i and what is my life that i should even be the son-in-law of the king?" (1Samuel 18 verse 18), Moses says to God "but who am i?...but i have a lisp...send someone else" (Exodus 3 verse 11, Exodus 4 verse 10 & verse 13) compare that with the greek tale of a god-child (hercules) who seems to have a bruised "humble" heart and demands to be accepted king or else he make a chopped-salad out of whom doesn't (luke 19 verse 27), does that sound like Jewish leaders that God chose? Doesn't it sound like he was a egomaniac?

  • @johnhullnewworldorder21
    @johnhullnewworldorder2111 ай бұрын

    Life starts against sin

  • @vincentfernandez7328
    @vincentfernandez732811 ай бұрын

    Jesus never used the word trinitry, and it doesn't appear in the cristian bible. It is just a theological concept. Cristianism always stated there is only One God. Jesus was or is "God with us", what God would have done if he would have come to the earth as one of us. Just That. And the Holy Spirit is only a presence of God. You can accept that God or at least God presence was in a box (the Arc of Covenance), or a Wind blowing and you cannot accept that God could have decided to come to earth as one of us, to teach us a lesson. For me, and for christians, makes perfect sense. In that aspect there is no difference between cristianism, and judaism. You have to find differences because you are desperate to prove Jesus was not the Messiah, something that is very very difficult.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Your hero caused the Jews to be slain by the sword, their remnants to be scattered and humbled, the Torah to be altered, and the majority of the world to err and serve a god other than the Lord.

  • @abc_6
    @abc_611 ай бұрын

    Matthew ch15 v25-27, 25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs” 27 “Yes it is, Lord,” she said. “Even the *dogs* eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

  • @chadstiles113
    @chadstiles11311 ай бұрын

    Correction*Rabbitt for greyhounds races. But the idea is the person who always bets on winner until they are'nt

  • @craigmoye2322
    @craigmoye232211 ай бұрын

    Rabbi, how does the messianic movement in the United States compare to the ones in Canada?

  • @NathanLabish

    @NathanLabish

    11 ай бұрын

    They are all christian

  • @danlopez.3592

    @danlopez.3592

    11 ай бұрын

    They are both really Jewish.

  • @nitanice

    @nitanice

    6 ай бұрын

    err? they're all whacko Xtians trying to convert Jews? Or something?

  • @user-jh6fq3rs9b
    @user-jh6fq3rs9b11 ай бұрын

    sholom uverocho reb tovia, i emailed you last week but had no response. hatzlocho

  • @AnielMet
    @AnielMet11 ай бұрын

    Please Rabino, put a spanish traslate in all your videos.🙏🏻

  • @screamtoasigh9984

    @screamtoasigh9984

    10 ай бұрын

    They are on most of his videos, if they are not you can add a translation browser extension or use the transcript in the description of each video. The only words that will translate incorrectly are the Hebrew words. If you have any questions about what he is saying, just ask what you need help with and timestamps so I know what you need me to write.

  • @Isaiah-qk9gp
    @Isaiah-qk9gp11 ай бұрын

    Absolute power corrupts absolutely nothing's changed since Daniels time the writing's on the wall

  • @ChrisMusante

    @ChrisMusante

    11 ай бұрын

    Ain't no amount of power available that can corrupt 'this' man. You are free to test me if you like... just be prepared to be disappointed AND hopefully 'pleased'... one right after the other.

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    Absolute power does not corrupt.

  • @MegaAnimeforlife
    @MegaAnimeforlife6 ай бұрын

    People who say Jesus is the angel of the lord are basically accidentally denying the trinity the trinity states that the father and son are equal and in once essence but distinct persons if Jesus is the angel of the lord that means he’s subordinate to god the father in these passages Zechariah 1:12 And the angel of the Lord replied and said, "O Lord of Hosts! How long will You not have mercy on Jerusalem and upon the cities of Judah, upon whom You are wroth for seventy years already?" Zechariah 1:13 And the Lord answered the angel who was speaking to me, good words-yea, consoling words. Zechariah 1:14 And the angel who was speaking to me said to me, "Proclaim, saying: 'So said the Lord of Hosts, I am jealous for Jerusalem, and for Zion-great jealousy. As you can tell god is speaking through this angel of the lord clearly and there is also where god commands the angel of the lord to put his sword away in 1 Samuel and 1 chronicles if the angel of the lord was the second godhead and part of god god would not have to tell god to stop lol

  • @VandalIO
    @VandalIO11 ай бұрын

    Trinitiesm is just polytheism… anyone who says it’s monotheism and god is 3 in 1 ! Is just lying to himself and everyone ..

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    Agreed

  • @NatoshaMarzucco
    @NatoshaMarzucco11 ай бұрын

    If you're a true JEW, only good things are going to happen. 🇮🇱🕊 If you're Islam disobeying the Quran out of jealousy of the Jew. Woe unto you. Woe unto you. Leave the Jew alone for your own betterment. 🪦🖤

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    nonsense.. its the christians like you who are plagiarizing the Jews here.. stop worshipping three gods and come back to Allah!

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    Look who’s talking, we already know you’re a Christian stop the nonsense.

  • @zaze8376

    @zaze8376

    11 ай бұрын

    Are you on drugs?

  • @Daniel-Tiger
    @Daniel-Tiger4 ай бұрын

    Yes Hindu is monotheistic too

  • @321ssteeeeeve
    @321ssteeeeeve11 ай бұрын

    The way I see it, the only option for all God fearing, Bible believing souls is to bridge the gap of division set between these faiths, even if the other is believed to be an impure faith. After all, they all were given to us by Abraham. This excludes agenda driven missionaries who lie about their faith to infiltrate vulnerable members of another.

  • @samvoron1727

    @samvoron1727

    11 ай бұрын

    People are born into different beliefs so it is important to help everyone with patience and kindness. One way to help Christians is to encourage them to look at each verse in the Gospel and ask "does this verse agree or disagree with Tanakh" because the Gospel says it is quoting from the Tanakh and the Gospel says the Jewish people must follow the Tanakh forever and that the Tanakh will never change in Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and Gospel of Matthew 23:1 - 23:3 meaning the Jewish people have the correct word of God. . Maybe an interested Christian will do this so that everything in the Gospel agrees with the Tanakh meaning they will have separated the verses that are in agreement with Tanakh compared to the verses that no Jew could have said like the claim that Jesus inherited the House of David which is impossible because Jesus had no biological father which is the only way to inherit a tribe in Judaism. . Helping Christians correct errors in their scripture so it agrees with Tanakh will help Christians understand what is correct and what cannot be correct because Gospel of Luke 24:44 says what is in the Gospel comes from the Tanakh meaning the Torah and the prophets and the writings in Jewish scripture and the Tanakh with the Jewish people will never change and must be followed by the Jewish people forever in Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and Gospel of Matthew 23:1 - 23:3 meaning the Jewish people have the correct word of God. . Gospel of Luke 24:44 And he (Jesus) said to them, "These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, how all the things written about me in the law of Moses (in the “Torah section” in Tanakh Jewish scripture) and the prophets (describing problems in the “prophets section” of Tanakh) and the psalms (which give the solution to the problems described by the prophets and are in the “writings section” in Tanakh) must be fulfilled." Note 1. The Tanakh Jewish scripture contains 3 parts (The Torah meaning "instruction" "teaching" "law" called a "light for guidance" and is followed by "the Prophets" who describe problems and then followed by "the Writings" which are the solution to the problems that are described by the prophets). . Gospels and letters in Christianity say Jesus is in Tanakh Jewish scripture so use Tanakh Jewish scripture as proof or disproof for what Christianity teaches. Some Christians who examine the claim in Gospel of Luke 24:44 become Jews or Noahides or Muslims but other Christians might want to ask Jews and Noahides and Muslims to help them find all the verses in the Gospels which contradict Tanakh so that they can add footnotes to explain a problem in a verse in the same way this has been done by Christians who have added footnotes to verses in the Gospels in the past.

  • @samvoron1727

    @samvoron1727

    11 ай бұрын

    When Muslims and Jews and Noahides and others are helping a Christian who wants help in examining a verse in the Gospel using the teachings in Tanakh the following guidance might help. 1. Moses and Jesus and Muhammad all agreed that the first Commandment of God is “God is one” meaning everything else is created by God. All other commandments are of no value if a person does not understand the first and most important commandment of God. For example if a person believes that Jesus is God it means they are not praying to God but to a creation that is made by God because God is the creator of every creation. When a person prays to a creation like a statue or the sun or animals or humans this is called idol worship and is the thinking of Greeks and Romans 2000 years ago and not the thinking of the Jewish prophets of God in Tanakh Jewish scripture. . 2. There are two ways of understanding the Gospel. One way is the Greek way of thinking 2000 years ago based on the idol worship of gods who had sons meaning real biological sons or the Jewish way based on one God who has sons meaning servants for example every angel and every human is a son of God meaning a servant of God because God is the creator of every creation. Only the Jewish way is correct because the Gospel says it is quoting from the Jewish scripture in Gospel of Luke 24:44 and Jesus is Jewish. Christians who are using the Greek thinking of 2000 years ago might think that son of God meaning a real biological son means Jesus is God. Other Christians who are using the Jewish thinking in Tanakh which Jesus said will never change and must be followed by the Jewish people forever in Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and Gospel of Matthew 23:1 - 23:3 understand that son of God meaning servant means Jesus is a servant of God. . 3. Scriptures like the Gospels which say they are quoting from the Tanakh are a test to show who understands Tanakh by following the word of God and who does not understand the Tanakh by contradicting the word of God in Tanakh and this is explained in 1 Kings 13:14 - 13:24 teaching that the word of God will not change and do not believe anyone who claims the word of God has changed even if a prophet comes to you and tells you that God has changed His word do not obey him but obey God because God is testing you to show if you love God by obeying the word of God which does not change as explained in Deuteronomy 13:2 - 13:4. . 4. Sometimes the Gospel contradicts the Tanakh however some publishers of the Gospels have added foot notes explaining problem verses in the past therefore Christians in the present or in future can add foot notes to show verses that cannot be true such as the claim that Jesus descended from David because it contradicts the Tanakh (where a person can only inherit a tribe like David biologically through the father and not by adoption and not through the mother and not by choice) which Jesus said will never change and must be followed forever in Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and Gospel of Matthew 23:1 - 23:3. . 5. There are no names on the front cover of the earliest manuscripts of the four Gospels meaning the names Mark, Matthew, Luke and John were added later. This means that by following the guidance in 1 to 4 above it is possible to find which verses agree with Tanakh meaning they are correct and which verses contradict the Tanakh meaning they could not have come from Jesus because Jesus said the Tanakh with the Jewish people will never change and must be followed forever in Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and that the Jewish people must listen to their rabbis because they will always have the correct word of God in the Tanakh in Gospel of Matthew 23:1 - 23:3. . 6. For the first time in history knowledgeable rabbis are explaining to any interested Christian worldwide on the Internet all the verses in the Gospel which contradict the Tanakh. If an interested Christian does not want to convert to Judaism or Noahide or Islam then such a Christian has an opportunity to separate everything in the Gospels which agrees with Tanakh meaning they agree with Jesus from everything in the Gospel which contradicts with Tanakh meaning they disagree with Jesus based on Gospel of Matthew 5:17 - 5:20 and 23:1 - 23:3. The result would be a Gospel that is in agreement with the Noahide teachings meaning the teachings about righteous non Jews in the Tanakh meaning all other teachings which contradict the Tanakh would be shown to have been invented after the time of Jesus. . 7. Christians who are working to add footnotes to problem verses in the Gospels should note that Rabbi Tovia Singer explains that Muslims are righteous gentiles meaning they correctly worship God for the following reasons. In the Quran Jesus did not come to replace or change the Torah but only delivered the same message as every prophet after Moses meaning “God is one” and “obey the Torah.” In the Quran Jesus is not the messiah who descended from the House of David because Jesus had no biological father which is the only way to inherit a tribe in Judaism because tribe cannot be inherited through the mother or through a non biological adopted father or by choice. The rabbi says that in the Quran Jesus did not come to change anything and therefore the Muslim belief in Jesus means Muslims believe Jesus was like all the prophets before him who all said “God is one with no partners” and “God is the God of Abraham Ishmael Isaac and Jacob and every creation and God established the laws of right and wrong” and that in Judaism Muslims are righteous gentiles meaning it is permissible for a Jew who cannot find a synagogue to pray to God in a mosque however it is not permissible for a Jew to pray to God in a church where a human like Jesus is worshipped as God (because in Judaism this is forbidden idol worship) or in a church where people believe that a human like Jesus died for the sins of the world (because in Judaism this is forbidden human sacrifice). . 8. Comparing Jewish and Christian stories is important because Gospel of Luke 24:44 claims everything it says is foretold in Tanakh Jewish scripture. If you read the Tanakh Jewish scripture and it is opposite to what is claimed in the Gospel then you have identified a verse which could not have come from Jesus. Asking the opinion of Jews and Noahides and Muslims can also help Christians find verses in the Gospel which contradict the teachings in Tanakh meaning those verses could not have come from Jesus.

  • @samvoron1727

    @samvoron1727

    11 ай бұрын

    1. God forbids idol worship. 2. Praying to saints or Mary or Jesus who are creations instead of praying only to God who is the creator is idol worship in Judaism and Islam and in some Christian sects. 3. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in Tanakh is a human biological descendant of the messiah king David through the messiah king Solomon meaning the messiah is not God and not a Trinity with God. 4. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that the messiah in the Quran is a human who did not descend from the messiah king David because a person who has no biological father inherits no tribe in Judaism. 5. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that in Gospel of John 20:17 Jesus said he did not die on the cross meaning no one sacrificed him and he explains that he is a human and he is not God. 6. Jews and Muslims love Christians by explaining that not all Christians believe that Jesus is God or that Jesus is a Trinity with God.

  • @samvoron1727

    @samvoron1727

    11 ай бұрын

    See 1. Appalled Christian Caller! "You call my religion idolatry?" Rabbi Tovia Singer responds. See 2. Christian shocked when Rabbi Tovia Singer defends Unitarians while teaching Torah. See 3. Rabbi Tovia Singer slams Church for erecting a barrier between man and God. See 4. Did the early Jews Believe In a Triune God? Rabbi Tovia slams pastor John Piper.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    All Gentiles need to keep the 7 Noahide commandments.

  • @ChrisMusante
    @ChrisMusante11 ай бұрын

    Because Abraham didn't come in 'his' name... but instead in God's name... thus he (Abraham) is then a blessing. Any questions?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Moses was a greater prophet than Abraham.

  • @ChrisMusante

    @ChrisMusante

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 my last name (African origin) Musante - MUS(A)NTE Musa - Moses Etna - Mountain of Fire Hi.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@ChrisMusante The true identity of a child as a Jew or a Gentile by birth is matrilineal; it follows the identity of the mother who conceived the embryo and carried it through pregnancy until the child's birth.

  • @algabba
    @algabba3 ай бұрын

    🤔🤔🤔🤔 Does Christians really think or realize that their religion, their denomination or even the name Christianity would not be forever? That when the only HASHEM comes to put and end to the enmity among all peoples, there would be ONLY One Torah, One Law, One King, One Priest, One Redeemer forever and ever? Not two, three or four; not the Pope, not Jesus, not Mary, not Paul, not John, Not Peter, not Theologians or Reformers, etc. That there would be no other way we will be worshiping and praising Him other than the same way His people worship Him? That is, with Psalms for example. That there would not be songs sang with lyrics to Jesus or the Holy Spirit. That those himns found in the Torah are FOR HASHEM, THE ELOHIM OF ISRAEL and TO HIM ALONE? No praises and songs of adoration or exaltation to Jesus or Yeshua but TO HASHEM the only ONE CREATOR, MAKER OF ALL!!

  • @jrj10a
    @jrj10a6 ай бұрын

    Shalom R. Tovia Singer, You seem to have gotten some things out of order. Genesis 14:18 it Melchizedek king of Salem. Refusal of booty is in 14:22 stated to King of Sodom. The point being that Melchizedek taught Abram, to notice His blessing and to give thanks to the Most High. To me this is very straight forward. in the previous discussion, you stated that THE LORD does not need anything from us. The actual answer is found throughout the Tanakh. However, I first discovered it in the creation story, Genesis 2. Why was the Man created a single? All else was created in male and female, but not MAN. Only Man did the ALMIGHTY: "LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul". NO other part of creation received this. Why? Why does the ALMIGHTY declare that we are HIS sons and daughters? This Heavens and Earth will be erased, destroyed, . . . But HE will; "Isaiah 51:16 And I have put My words in thy mouth, and have covered thee in the shadow of My hand, that I may plant the heavens, and lay the foundations of the earth, and say unto Zion: 'Thou art My people.'" The ALMIGHTY is not of this Universe, and is not bound by time or space. Hence I believe that HE knows about this writing before saying "Let there be light!". If HE KNOWS this, and all of the trouble and evil that people have done from then until now. Why create or allow it to continue this far in time, if HE is only being nice? Why put up with the pain of human actions? Unless HE is seeking something so special, that creating the Universe and all that entails, suffer the rejection of HIS children, to find the ONES that will Love HIM BACK and be HIS Children?

  • @Yehonatan613
    @Yehonatan61311 ай бұрын

    A] The Jewish mashiach will be a PATERNAL descendant of David (Isaiah 11 verse 1&10, Jeremiah 23 verses 5-8, Jeremiah 30 verse 9, Jeremiah 33 verse 15, Ezekiel 34 verses 23&24, Ezekiel 37 verse 24&25, Amos 9 verses 11&12, Hoseah 3 verse 5, 2Samuel 7 verse 16, Psalms 89 verses 4&5, Psalm 89 verses 34-38, Psalms 18 verse 51, Jeremiah 33 verses 20-26). *Genealogy in the Bible is only passed down from father to son, Numbers 1:1-18.* Not having a biological father from the direct family tree (isaiah 11:1) back to David and Jesse, disqualifies a person from any claim to the Jewish mashiach. B] the mashiach of hebrew scriptures brings the Jewish people from all over the world-wide exiles back to the land of israel (isaiah 11 verses 11&12, ezekiel 37 verses 24&25, deuteronomy 30 verse 3, jeremiah 30 verse 3, jeremiah 32 verse 37, ezekiel 11 verse 17, ezekiel 36 verse 24). In the time of jesus the jews were in the land, he did not help them conquer their enemies as mashiach is supposed to (numbers 24 verses 17-19) and were exiled from israel shortly after, the total opposite of what the prophets revealed the true mashiach will do. C] the mashiach of hebrew scriptures ushers in a utopian world of peace, where there will no longer be any wars (Zechariah 9 verse 10 [ps. Note, verse 10 is a direct continuation of verse 9 which christians claim was already fulfilled...yet he didn't fulfill the verse that it goes right into, verse 10?...], Isaiah 2 verses 1-4, Micha 4 verses 1-4, Hoseah 2 verse 20, Isaiah 60 verse 18). jesus did not bring world peace, the opposite is true, how much unnecessary loss came through the crusades and the likes all in the name of jesus. D] the mashiach of hebrew scripture brings the entire jewish nation back to full observance of the Torah (Ezekiel 37 verse 24, all the same time periods of Ezekiel 11 verses 19&20, ezekiel 36 verses 26&27, Deut 30 verses 8&10, Jeremiah 31 verse 32). jesus in the NT disobeys the temple authorities in violation of Deut 17 verses 10-13, he and his men pluck wheat stalks on the shabbat day, a violation of shabbat (numbers 15 verses 32-36), he claims that divorce isn't allowed and that it is forbidden to marry after divorce, while the torah says otherwise, thus adding and/or subtracting from the Torah's laws (Deut 4:2, deut 13:1), he gives prophecies that didn't come true, such as "not one stone of this temple will be left ontop of another" and yet the western outer wall stands tall and deep into the temple mount till today [and yes theres archeological proof that it is infact the western outer wall of the temple], he said more than once "none of this generation shall taste death before you see the full kingdom come" did not happen, giving a failed prophecy according to the torah makes him a false prophet and viable to the D penalty (Deut 18 verses 20-22), and jesus def did not cause for Jewish people to embrace the torah, instead he caused a major rift and didn't observe the laws himself. E] mashiach of Hebrew scripture emerges at a time where there is universal knowledge of God (Isaiah 11 verse 9, which is a parallel to chavakuk 2 verse 14, Zechariah 8 verses 20-23, zechariah 14 verse 9 & verse 16, Isaiah 66 verse 23, isaiah 45 verse 23, ezekiel 38 verse 23, zephanya 3:9). The amount of statues there are of jesus and mary, oh boy, how the negligence of one pompous man caused for a third of the worlds population into all diff forms of polytheism and idolatry... F] mashiach of hebrew scripture reigns leader at a time when the 3rd ever lasting temple is standing forever (Ezekiel 37 verses 24-28 which is the same exact end of days temple of Isaiah 2, of zechariah 14 verses 20&21, of Malachi 3 verse 4, of Isaiah 56 verse 7, of Isaiah 60 verse 7, of Isaiah 66 verse 20) where the mashiach himself prepares flour and animal offerings at its inaguration (Ezekiel 45 verse 17, the same exact prince/נשיא of Ezekiel 37 verse 25). The way God made sure no jew can ever make a claim of illegitimacy against a Jewish king was by commanding a prophet to anoint that king with the sacred anointing oil (exodus 30 verses 25-30) as He commanded Samuel to do to Saul (1samuel 10 verse 1), and to David (1samuel 16 verse 13), and as Tzadok the High priest and nathan the prophet did to King Solomon (1kings 1 verse 34). The mashiach is called "mashiach" (literally "anointed") because Elijah the prophet is supposed to anoint him with the sacred anointing oil as King over the Jewish people. God, who will split the ocean in order to convince when He wishes to convince, has NO PROBLEM making the jewish people believe someone is or isnt their next king, He did so for Saul, David, Solomon, the priests, all to remove any claim of illegitimacy by any jew. The Creator DID NOT DO SUCH for the christian man-diety, something so simple, and no. The jews did not "reject" jesus, the Creator did. That's the truth.

  • @Majobri

    @Majobri

    11 ай бұрын

    EMET! may jesus and paul and all of christianity rot and be forgotten from the world AMEN!

  • @Yehonatan613

    @Yehonatan613

    11 ай бұрын

    ​​@@MajobriAmen. They will, Zechariah 13 verses 1-6 and Zechariah 14, may it happen sooner than later ❤

  • @MitzvosGolem1

    @MitzvosGolem1

    11 ай бұрын

    Excellent 👍 I saved you data to add to my notes. I use much of this to explain to xtians why we reject Avoda Zora idolatory and pagan human sacrifice for sin thing. תודה רבה שלום

  • @user-ln5il4un3x

    @user-ln5il4un3x

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@Majobri Amen. After looking into "Ceaser Messiah", I believe they're Rome.

  • @Yehonatan613

    @Yehonatan613

    11 ай бұрын

    @@MitzvosGolem1 G bless you

  • @georgevazquez5565
    @georgevazquez556511 ай бұрын

    I like to know how did Jesus know the temple will be built, and the start of sacrifice, then say those in Judea, samara to run,he couldn't know if even Jerusalem would still exist,,

  • @zaze8376

    @zaze8376

    11 ай бұрын

    ​​@@jjphankJesus was not allnknowing.

  • @daome2012
    @daome201211 ай бұрын

    Why does "god", who exists as a singular and solitary person, create?

  • @paulpearce1311
    @paulpearce13119 ай бұрын

    Mishka!

  • @JanKozak-ww6zz
    @JanKozak-ww6zz11 ай бұрын

    Sey no

  • @grandmarnier3746
    @grandmarnier374611 ай бұрын

    What does Judaism say about life after death? What's supposed to happen in their eyes when they die?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Any Gentile who accepts the Seven Noahide Commandments, and is careful to observe them, is truly a pious individual of the nations of the world, and merits an eternal portion in the future World to Come. (And with this merit, the person will be included in the Resurrection of the Dead). This applies only if he accepts them and does them because the Holy One, blessed be He, commanded them in the Torah, and made it known through Moses our teacher, that the Children of Noah were previously commanded to fulfill them.

  • @grandmarnier3746

    @grandmarnier3746

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 Is there any assurance of this future resurrections? What's the line between carefully observing to them and not?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@grandmarnier3746 The weighing of sins and merits is carried out according to the wisdom of the Knowing God. Only He knows how to measure merits against sins.

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    @@grandmarnier3746 Jews believe that the wicked will be annilhilated but the righteous will be with YAHWEH when they die. How do I know this? -because I asked them!

  • @grandmarnier3746

    @grandmarnier3746

    10 ай бұрын

    @@shaunigothictv1003 I kind of gathered that yeah, but is there any assurance of one's righteousness?

  • @rustneversleeps01
    @rustneversleeps0111 ай бұрын

    B'rasheet 1.26.H430 Elohim/God said, let us make man in our image after our likeness Sure sounds plural ?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    The refutation to the heretics is written alongside it in the following verse: “And God created,” and it does not say, “and they created.”

  • @rustneversleeps01

    @rustneversleeps01

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 H430God/ Elohim אֱלֹהִים Transliteration: 'ĕlōhîm Pronunciation: el-o-heem' Part of Speech: masculine noun Root Word (Etymology): Plural of אֱלוֹהַּ (H433) TWOT Reference: 93c Outline of Biblical Usage: (plural) rulers, judges divine ones angels gods (plural intensive - singular meaning) god, goddess godlike one works or special possessions of God the (true) God God

  • @bookmouse2719
    @bookmouse271911 ай бұрын

    Malketzedek = Shem.......Melek in Hebrew is King, Tzadek in Hebrew is righteous.

  • @biruk8617
    @biruk861711 ай бұрын

    Do we have any proof that Shem, Son of Noah lived that long (8 lines of genealogies) and is Melchizedek? How could the writer (Moses) miss to mention that?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    The oral Torah mentions it.

  • @biruk8617

    @biruk8617

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 The Talmud? This is epic! Not to have been mentioned in the written Torah means the writer of the Torah was full of errors. The written Torah mentions all relevant and important birth and death of the patriarchs and also some matriarchs. For example "Sarah died at the age of 127". The writer of the Torah was led by God and was not dumb. If Shem lived that long, it would have been recorded! This fact shows us that the Oral Jewish Tradition has brought in many unreal and falsified explanations of the written Torah. The problem with the Talmud is that we have no proof of who said what and when. It is just oral.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@biruk8617 Moses received the entire Torah from God, both the Written Torah (the Five Books of Moses) and the Oral Torah. The Oral Torah is the explanation of all the commandments, which are very concisely recorded in those Five Books: 613 for Jews and the 7 for Gentiles.

  • @biruk8617

    @biruk8617

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 I understand the need for the Oral Torah. But that doesn't answer the question raised above. Why would some things be written and others not? One has to be a standard for checking all others. Therefore it is the written Torah on which anyone can rely for true learning and absolute truth. Many Rabbis have interpreted Melchizedek and have tried to present an alternative explanation as to who he is. But people chose to believe whatever they think is right in their own sight. It doesn't mean they are right according to God. Again there is no direct proof from God or Moses as to the identity of Melchizedek being Shem. It is one of the alternative explanations. It is really impossible for God or Moses to have missed such a crucial matter while attending to many other less important issues. We can argue forever but there is no proof (like "Sarah died at the age of 127") for Melchizedek without undermining the writer of the Five Books of Torah and the God who presented it to Moses. It also shows Gentiles have a lot more respect for the Books of Moses than the Jews.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@biruk8617 The written text dictated to Moses by God was consonants only and had no written vowels. The vowels, which are 100% necessary for words to exist, are part of the Oral Tradition and not the Written Torah.

  • @Bobbyseekingtruth
    @Bobbyseekingtruth11 ай бұрын

    Rabbi, Tovia.. I enjoy your lessons and debates.. unfortunately, I haven’t seen a fair debate. When a Hebrew man like yourself ,that is well educated, and well learned in the heavenly tongue, which is Hebrew, and has grown up with the instructions of Torah. You cannot go against a man like this. I have a Rabbi that is from Israel and from the tribe of Levi and speaks fluent Hebrew, but he believes in Yeshua not the church or the Trinity.. I would love to see this Rabbi and Rabbi Tovia have a fair debate . This would be incredible! I’ve been trying to reach out to Rabbi Tovia through email. He responded to my first email and said I could ask him questions but after that no more response.. Hopefully, we could make this happen.. I posted this on your KZread videos Rabbi, I would love to hear from you. I know you must be busy.. we all are.. This is the most important topic in my life.. I'm willing to pay for a meeting. Just let me know your fees. I heard you do tours or maybe I can host the debate? Let's talk Shalom Bobby

  • @MegaAnimeforlife

    @MegaAnimeforlife

    5 ай бұрын

    What is he a Unitarian messianic Jewish? I saw some messanic rabbis who were preaching Unitarianism but most are trinitarians funny thing is that it never days in the Bible that you have to believe Jesus is god to he saved just that he’s the lamb of god and messiah in fact in the New Testament it says no human being as seen god ”that the blessed and only ruler will make manifest at the proper time, the King of kings and Lord of Lords,“ ‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭6‬:‭15‬ ‭NABRE‬‬ ”who alone has immortality, who dwells in unapproachable light, and whom no human being has seen or can see. To him be honor and eternal power. Amen. Right Use of Wealth.“ ‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭6‬:‭16‬ ‭NABRE‬‬

  • @MegaAnimeforlife

    @MegaAnimeforlife

    5 ай бұрын

    In fact rabbi tovia admits that there’s nothing wrong with Jesus being the messiah just that a man cannot be god most Jews could accept Jesus as the messiah and atonement for sin and still go to the synagogue but not that god became a man and died I think that the Jewish Christians kept true to the unity of god in the 1st century but the Greek gentle were the ones who created the binitarian and eventually trinitarianism we see today while the Jewish Christian’s were prosecuted and destroyed by trinitarian Christianity and rabbinic Judaism

  • @absolutelysensational8094
    @absolutelysensational809411 ай бұрын

    I loved this video. I am Yeshua follow but I watch a lot the Rabbi teaches and I learn a lot of the Torah and Tannak.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Gentiles need to keep the 7 Noahide commandments. Good luck.

  • @tiarabite

    @tiarabite

    6 күн бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 And what happens if they don't?

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    5 күн бұрын

    @@tiarabite God punishes them.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    5 күн бұрын

    @@tiarabite I removed your offensive comment.

  • @sim448
    @sim44811 ай бұрын

    i used to be a jehovahs witness and they too deny trinity. But ive been looking into judaism lately, why they reject new testament, Jesus and vicarious atonement. I can understand to an extent. But its really overwelming trying to understand all the arguments counter arguments on both sides. One has to be very knowledgable with years of serious study. Also no easy to remain totally unbiased i find

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    The authenticity of Moses is based on the public revelation at Sinai: God revealed Himself to the entire nation of Israel, at least three million people, and proclaimed before them the Ten Commandments. The entire Jewish people personally experienced that revelation, each individual in effect becoming a prophet, and each one verifying the experience of the other. With their own eyes they saw, and with their own ears they heard, as the Divine voice spoke to them, and also they heard God saying, "Moses, Moses, go tell them the following ..." They did not receive the occurrence of that event and accept it as some claim or tradition of an individual, but they experienced it themselves. That public revelation, therefore, authenticated the bona fide status of Moses as a prophet of God, and the Divine origin of the instructions he recorded in the Torah. That, and that alone, is the criterion for the belief in, and acceptance of, Moses and his teachings.

  • @nitanice

    @nitanice

    6 ай бұрын

    You're probably making it too complicated. Jesus was Jewish. If you'd truly follow him -- and I have no clue why one human would "follow" another on Twitter or TikTok or in some crazy religion. But if you did, wouldn't you want to follow what he was following, do what he was doing, you know, the whole WWJD thing? Or at least know what a Jewish person, as he was, knew? followed? did? Just saying.

  • @designoengineering9793
    @designoengineering979311 ай бұрын

    malakh sadak = Malik Sadik = righteous king = ملك صادق = it is an arabic name

  • @tbishop4961

    @tbishop4961

    11 ай бұрын

    Meckalecka hi mecka hiney ho

  • @screamtoasigh9984

    @screamtoasigh9984

    11 ай бұрын

    Arabic is way younger than Hebrew. melech =king Tsadik = righteous. מלך צדיק Hence a tzadik is a righteous person And we give and do tsedaka = charity It is not surprising they are similar in Arabic, Hebrew and Arabic are both Semitic languages albeit from groups. Hebrew is the only surviving language of its group

  • @designoengineering9793

    @designoengineering9793

    11 ай бұрын

    @@screamtoasigh9984 No , you are mistaken , Sadik means in arabic ( arabic is the oldest language than hebrew , Ishmael was born beside arabic tribe of Jorhom , Madian of Shoayeb was arabic town , Arabic is richest language than hebrew ) Sadik means in arabic the honest one , and this is the sign of righteous king , Tsadik is wrong , there is nothing called Ts in hebrew , it was S like Sad in arabic , but it changed after attempts of reviving hebrew language in the last 100 years . thanks

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@designoengineering9793hebrew is older and it was never lost

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    11 ай бұрын

    @@designoengineering9793 you have been lied to.

  • @hanumharkit1485
    @hanumharkit148510 ай бұрын

    why hiduism is also monotheism..we will found out from the diphtong, accent, phonemes... abraham and sara..brahma and sarasvati... maybe brahma as the god personification or description in order to reachable by human brain in that era and region..because the true god is acyntia (the unreachable by human brain)..just my opinion..

  • @myopinions1
    @myopinions111 ай бұрын

    You are not allowed to teach non-Jews Judaism without knowing for a fact they keep all Shevah Mitzvos.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Jews are commanded by the Almighty to compel all the inhabitants of the world to accept the commandments given to Noah's descendants.

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    Nonsense, was Moses not teaching Pharaoh ?

  • @yusufm4567
    @yusufm45679 ай бұрын

    Rabbi should ask people to embrace Islam as it is the monotheistic religion for gentiles.

  • @abrahamism

    @abrahamism

    3 ай бұрын

    He's technically inspiring people for that. He's promoting Islam more beautifully than even many today's muslim leaders lol

  • @DVous
    @DVous11 ай бұрын

    I’m a disappointed atheist/reluctant agnostic. Jesus never claims to be God, I really can’t see why Christians feel the need to claim that he is, he called himself the son of God. The trinity isn’t explicitly stated in the New Testament either, I don’t see why they need to claim that as well. There’s multiple instances of Jesus separating himself from God, like Mark 10:18 or John 8:18. Jesus calls himself and others “the son of God”, so in Matthew 28:19, the only way I can get it to make any sense to me at all, is to look outside of the Abrahamic faiths and see it as God is absolute and we are all one, God witnessing his own creation.

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    God gave 613 commandments for Jews and the 7 for Gentiles.

  • @GatheringJacob
    @GatheringJacob11 ай бұрын

    What you said about Sarah - so she was married before and the husband died. Do we know who the man was and where do we find this information? Another question- so Isaac was the son in effect to Sarah’s first husband? That does not seem right. Or does Ishmael fill that bill?

  • @chatisawasteoftime

    @chatisawasteoftime

    11 ай бұрын

    Did you miss the part that Sarah was barren?

  • @GatheringJacob

    @GatheringJacob

    11 ай бұрын

    @@chatisawasteoftime is that sarcasm? In order for a man to know a woman is barren before he marries her and repetitively sleeps with her, there is only one way to know that that woman is barren - she was married before having relations with a man and not getting pregnant. Did you hear what Tovia said about Abraham marrying Sarah? It was a levirate marriage where Abraham married a relatives wife typically a brother that died. Did you hear him say that or no?

  • @rosenalbo12

    @rosenalbo12

    11 ай бұрын

    I will try to explain, she wasn’t married before, the fact the the Torah used that word “barren” is to teach us that some how, Avraham knew about it. Any verse that contain info that we ask, why Hashem choose this way of talking, is to let us know that something is going on, and we have the duty to try to understand why it was written that way

  • @GatheringJacob

    @GatheringJacob

    11 ай бұрын

    @@rosenalbo12 Did you hear what Tovia said about Abraham marrying Sarah? It was a levirate marriage where Abraham married a relatives wife typically a brother that died. Did you hear him say that or no? So you are saying something different than Tovia. Which is fine but neither you nor the other person who replied to my comment are really helping in regards to my original comment.

  • @rosenalbo12

    @rosenalbo12

    11 ай бұрын

    The Torah wasnt yet given. You are right that levirate is done on brothers that died with out any child (at all) and his wife then have to go to a procces of levirate (yibum) or divorce (chalitza), thats the process sfter the TOrah was given in Sinai. Abraham avinu some how want it to apply this concept.

  • @timothylevin2661
    @timothylevin266110 ай бұрын

    Unitarians never started any Pogroms 👍

  • @marybeck7594
    @marybeck759411 ай бұрын

    Both are very respectful, nice to see in today's world. May hashems name be blessed.

  • @danlopez.3592

    @danlopez.3592

    11 ай бұрын

    One is going to hell though

  • @brianwilliams629

    @brianwilliams629

    10 ай бұрын

    @@danlopez.3592false

  • @koreyoneal2623
    @koreyoneal262311 ай бұрын

    "sons of rulers" ??? Now THAT'S a terrible translation , it's Bene ha'Elohim , Sons of God , angels , in this case , fallen angels , Enoch talks about it too

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    "Sons of G-d" is often used in the Ancient Near East as an idiom for temple priests.

  • @koreyoneal2623

    @koreyoneal2623

    11 ай бұрын

    @@disassembledpurity well it's also used in The Book of Job to refer to angels

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    @@koreyoneal2623 I have no idea as to the actual answer - I haven't researched enough yet. I was just adding some context that in the ANE, "Sons of G-d" is used as a term for temple priests.

  • @koreyoneal2623

    @koreyoneal2623

    11 ай бұрын

    @@disassembledpurity hey , I'm not an expert either but I do study quite a bit and I know for a a fact that Bene ha'Elohim means Sons of God , referring to angels and that's exactly how it was used in Job . I've found that people like to steer away from things that are "risque" or "taboo" , most don't want to admit that fallen angels mated with human women , creating the nephilim (giants) , which is what brought about Noah's Flood , that's why the line of Seth theory was created , to answer the truth away . I've never seen Bene ha'Elohim translated as "sons of rulers" anywhere , nor have I seen a commentary using that term , I really think that it's a deflection tactic

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    @@koreyoneal2623 I don't know, but people say that such a view would have major problematic implications (although I don't know what those implications are). I'm open to that view for now, but I simply haven't done enough research to claim anything. Also, I recall seeing something along the lines of "Sons of Rulers" somewhere in the Talmud (its probably paraphrased though) as a view of some Rabbis, this is probably where Rabbi Tovia Singer is getting it from, but this is only one interpretation proposed in the Talmud and is more of a generalization of the view from the priests (who often tend to have ruling power). In the Talmud, most commentators follow the opinion in the Midrash that the translation is something like “the sons of the powerful ones” (bnei ha’elohim) and it refers to the sons of the judges and noblemen (the two are intricately tied, with priests being a type of nobility, and enacting judgements upon society) who by capriciously taking whichever women they wanted “fell” from their appropriate spiritual level. Rather than serving as role models for the lower classes, they used their power to take advantage of them. Although I do think that there's a minority view in the Talmud that aligns more with what you wrote.

  • @jf5177
    @jf517711 ай бұрын

    Even RC Sproul admits in his book on the Trinity that the concept of the Trinity was developed over time because they couldn’t understand the nature of their god. So Jesus came to this earth incarnated and propel STILL didn’t know the nature of god?

  • @marktravis5162

    @marktravis5162

    11 ай бұрын

    That’s exactly why as a Christian I reject the trinity because it came way later after Jesus and the apostles

  • @kv8508

    @kv8508

    11 ай бұрын

    @@marktravis5162 Jesus said to baptise in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit so he put all those 3 names together on the same level. The trinity is right there.

  • @antoniopadro1760

    @antoniopadro1760

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@kv8508that was later added to scriptures over time but seriously when was jesus ever called or named immanuel by Mary the married virgin according to Isaiah 7:14 out of context?

  • @marktravis5162

    @marktravis5162

    11 ай бұрын

    @@kv8508 Explain how you see that’s a trinity? And Father, Son and Holy Spirit are not names

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@kv8508 The belief in a divine trinity is an idolatrous concept, since it is a belief that God (or according to some, a second separate divinity) has characteristic features, and the characteristics of a body.

  • @bubbagumpy978
    @bubbagumpy97811 ай бұрын

    So, Christianity is singled out as being idolatrous unless they renounce Jesus?

  • @etzelkaplan9677

    @etzelkaplan9677

    11 ай бұрын

    the opposite. rabbi Jesus ' the greatest command is to worship our lord the one god only ' today only muslims obey Jesus greatest command

  • @-Fuzz-Buzz

    @-Fuzz-Buzz

    11 ай бұрын

    ​@@etzelkaplan9677Complete nonsense the teachings of Islam fundamentally contracted Jesus Christ.

  • @etzelkaplan9677

    @etzelkaplan9677

    11 ай бұрын

    @@-Fuzz-Buzz so you think Jesus taught roman pagan trinity ? demanded you guys in church eat his flesh drink his blood ate pork. and never fell on hs face in prayer [prostrated ] and worshipped on sun day. the day Rome worshipped the sun god. on sun. day ? are you nuts

  • @bubbagumpy978

    @bubbagumpy978

    11 ай бұрын

    @@etzelkaplan9677 You do realize to become a Noahide, you must renounce Muhammad as a prophet? Do you plan on becoming a Noahide? Thanks.

  • @bubbagumpy978

    @bubbagumpy978

    11 ай бұрын

    @@etzelkaplan9677 Except for these. Muhammad claimed the angel Gabriel appeared to him. Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. 1Ti 6:3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;

  • @vasilejuca9419
    @vasilejuca941910 ай бұрын

    You guys are a fuller Do Judaism or any religion have better morality than Trini terrian religion? I myself I do not have much Faith in any religion but I believe in human dignity. But not Judaism, not an any other religion makes sense to me. When comes to human dignity period If God exists, I don't know. But I do believe in supernatural force which did not make himself clear to

  • @abc_6
    @abc_611 ай бұрын

    Should unmarried women also cover their hair according to your faith?

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@Raizel613 Rambam said unmarried should also cover

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@Raizel613It is better for unmarried women to cover also since they have to preserve their virginity until marriage.

  • @brucheweinberger6863

    @brucheweinberger6863

    6 ай бұрын

    Ashkenazi women don't.

  • @abrahamism

    @abrahamism

    3 ай бұрын

    ​@@brucheweinberger6863they're doing wrong

  • @NatoshaMarzucco
    @NatoshaMarzucco11 ай бұрын

    " I swear and I will not repent thou art a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." I need a Jew to tell me what that means. Who is our priest forever?❤️

  • @NatoshaMarzucco

    @NatoshaMarzucco

    11 ай бұрын

    @bt-lt4os Thank you, but that's not a Jewish perspective. Bless you:) amen🕎💜☝️

  • @NatoshaMarzucco

    @NatoshaMarzucco

    11 ай бұрын

    @bt-lt4os You answer the question the almighty is done with the gentile. He gave them the opportunity. Read the epistles and take them seriously.🖤💔 Judgment is coming for what you did with the blood. 😔🩸

  • @whitestone3292

    @whitestone3292

    11 ай бұрын

    I'm not a Jew, though I am a Judean. Saw in the book of Yasher, that Mel was Noah's son Shem.

  • @NatoshaMarzucco

    @NatoshaMarzucco

    11 ай бұрын

    @bt-lt4os The priesthood being changed there must also be a change of the law. .... What verse is that

  • @NatoshaMarzucco

    @NatoshaMarzucco

    11 ай бұрын

    @@bt-lt4os 😔🪦🖤☝️

  • @georgecaraballo
    @georgecaraballo11 ай бұрын

    Mekelzibek was a Canaanite who worshipped El Elyon who was the father of many gods , who he gave inheritance to…

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    Yes, but afterwards he worshipped Elyons son YAHWEH.

  • @robsmith5388
    @robsmith538811 ай бұрын

    Wow, you can really tell who is to be the light to the nations listening to this conversation, hint, it’s not the Christian. The Torah is divine not the king James,that’s why God is one and Jesus is strange.

  • @AamirKhan-bh7bw

    @AamirKhan-bh7bw

    11 ай бұрын

    Jesus was prophet

  • @robsmith5388

    @robsmith5388

    5 ай бұрын

    @@WordofGod144 no,what I’m saying is Jesus is ungodly and strange. only God is to be worshiped. do you worship Jesus? is Jesus part of a coequal triune god head? do you say in Jesus name amen when you pray?if so, that would be called idolitry worse than murder in the eyes of God. repent

  • @shanebell2514
    @shanebell251411 ай бұрын

    Can God become a man?

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    Yes. But would he? NO, according to his own statements in the Old Testament

  • @shanebell2514

    @shanebell2514

    10 ай бұрын

    @@shaunigothictv1003 Who spoke to Abraham in Genesis 18:10?

  • @shaunigothictv1003

    @shaunigothictv1003

    10 ай бұрын

    @@shanebell2514 That has nothing to do with the question. If it was Jesus who spoke then it still does not prove that YAHWEH became a man.

  • @shanebell2514

    @shanebell2514

    10 ай бұрын

    @@shaunigothictv1003 I asked the question, WHO spoke to Abraham in Genesis 18:10?

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@@shanebell2514angels

  • @theduncansheik
    @theduncansheik11 ай бұрын

    Sorry, Rebbi, but the "hindu" gentleman was in fact correct when he said that Hinduism is the oldest form of monotheism. You apparently did not get the memo - perhaps not your fault. If you read any of the early Vedic texts (or any of the Gitas for that matter) you will see that the underlying theology of what is now refereed to as Hinduism is probably more monotheistic than even Judaism. It posits the idea that the entire universe is an ocean of a single consciousness. Even Judaism makes a distinction between "God" and humans and angels and whatever other creatures are out there in the world. Advaita Vedanta (the philosophical underpinning of what you refer to as Hinduism) says there is no such distinction. We are all one with God - and part of God - and "he" is within us and we are within "him". Please do a bit more study on this because I think you are brilliant and it would enrich your own spiritual practice.

  • @etzelkaplan9677

    @etzelkaplan9677

    11 ай бұрын

    500 million hindus left hinduism for islam/monotheism in 20th century. Pakistans Bangladesh. India proper hindus worship thousands of wood/metal/plastic/glue idols

  • @zaze8376

    @zaze8376

    11 ай бұрын

    Are you that blind? Hindus worship many many statues which they call Gods. They are obviously polytheists.

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    Dawg, that's not actual monotheism or even G-d, its at best what neoplatonists might call "universal intellect". Its nothing like Judaism + its pantheistic not necessarily strong panentheism + you have to produce proof that its actually earlier than Judaism (studies like that of Olivelle 1992, clearly indicate that for example, Advaita Vedanta began to form in the first centuries CE while Judaism goes back to at least 13th century BCE) + in Advaita Vedanta this "consciousness" doesn't necessarily have its own will which is contradictory of course + its possible to still worship idols in Advaita Vedanta and it was often done bc the "deities" are manifestations of the consciousness but its a little iffy + you're confusing ontological distinctions in Judaism - you can still have distinctions even within G-d, blessed be He. Also I don't think you quite get many Jewish views either, read some Hasidic works which express a view that is somewhat close to what you think and then contrast it to see how its different. Good luck!

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    Hindu gods have forms. The Jewish God does not have a body or any form.

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 The guy is not referring to the Hindu "gods" that you're thinking about here.

  • @user-bw1kz8eg3l
    @user-bw1kz8eg3l11 ай бұрын

    It is not true that Trinity was proclaimed at Nicea.

  • @brianwilliams629

    @brianwilliams629

    10 ай бұрын

    Yes it is

  • @beagleman123456789
    @beagleman12345678911 ай бұрын

    Bh’ ✡️🇮🇱

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *Matthew 10:34-35* 34 “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to turn a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law 34 אַל־תַּחְשְׁבוּ כִּי בָאתִי לְהָטִיל שָׁלוֹם בָּאָרֶץ לֹא בָאתִי לְהָטִיל שָׁלוֹם כִּי אִם־חָרֶב: 35 כִּי בָאתִי לְהַפְרִיד בֵּין אִישׁ וְאָבִיו וּבֵין בַּת וְאִמָּהּ וּבֵין כַּלָּה וַחֲמוֹתָהּ

  • @MitzvosGolem1

    @MitzvosGolem1

    11 ай бұрын

    PS: there is no and was no Hebrew new testament until 1800s CE .

  • @mmroth5627

    @mmroth5627

    11 ай бұрын

    Check out a video from rabbi singer, from a while back, adressing this lie.

  • @DanieBen-qg2bm
    @DanieBen-qg2bm11 ай бұрын

    Well the devil punched me once in my spirit or soul (whatever we call it that living inside us, I don't know what is it) it was not a sleep attack it happened when I was travelling on the a bus, i prayed all night again him targeting his kingdom and it happened. Another time I did not did for 3 straight days because I was fighting against devil using the Lord's prayer and his demons and fought back and on the fourth night an Angel help me to fight those demons and I was able sleep because he told he was here to help me. I sleep peacefully on that night till morning and ever since that night I didn't have any sleep attack. (I cannot describe it like once you close your very eyes the war begins, It did not happen in a deep sleep, It happened literally when I close my eyes to lay down so I have prayer again them, it like that for 3 straight night until that angle came to help me, he did not say his name and he did not show his face but I saw his sword he told me he was here to help me and I can get the rest I desperately wanted, I slept that night and that attack never happened again. Have both of you fought the Devil already, sitting there lecturing the whole world about Devil isn't real is like questioning witchcraft doesn't exist in the old Testament (did pharaoh magicians get that power from God to challenge the power of God) where did they get all the power from? If really want to feel the Devil, I suggest you pray against him using the Lord’s prayer (or any prayer) don't be scared just try it out, yeah he isn't real 😂.

  • @antoniopadro1760

    @antoniopadro1760

    11 ай бұрын

    According to revelation 20:3 he is locked up so what devil are you fighting?

  • @DanieBen-qg2bm

    @DanieBen-qg2bm

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760 2000 years have elapse and you are still in 70 A.D

  • @DanieBen-qg2bm

    @DanieBen-qg2bm

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760 like I said you test it. 😂

  • @antoniopadro1760

    @antoniopadro1760

    11 ай бұрын

    @@DanieBen-qg2bm what devil are you talking about if he's locked up according to revelation 20:3?

  • @DanieBen-qg2bm

    @DanieBen-qg2bm

    11 ай бұрын

    @@antoniopadro1760 1000 year's have elapse are you blind read the whole thing, you not in 70 A.D

  • @-Fuzz-Buzz
    @-Fuzz-Buzz11 ай бұрын

    Misconceptions about the Council of Nicea are rampant. Sorry, but anyone claiming that the Trinity was invented is just showing anti-Trinitarian bias and has a poor knowledge of Roman history and a bad knowledge of Ecclesiastical history.

  • @yair958

    @yair958

    11 ай бұрын

    All of Christianity and the New Testament is pagan idolatry I find it funny that you use their made up concepts that were not written by prophets at all

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *Philippians 1:18* But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from *FALSE* motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice. Yes, and I will continue to rejoice אֶלָּא מַה־בְּכָךְ וּבִלְבַד שֶׁיֻּכְרַז הַמָּשִׁיחַ בֵּין בַּעֲלִילָה וּבֵין בֶּאֱמֶת בָּזֹאת אֲנִי שָׂמֵחַ וְגַם אֱהְיֶה שָׂמֵח

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *John 15:6* If anyone does not abide in Me, he is cast out as a branch and is withered; and they gather them and throw them into the fire, and they are burned אִישׁ אֲשֶׁר לֹא יַעֲמֹד בִּי הֻשְׁלַךְ הַחוּצָה כַּשָּׂרִיג וַיִּיבַשׁ וְיִלְקְטוּם וְיַשְׁלִיכוּם אֶל־תּוֹךְ הַאֵשׁ וְהָיָה לְבָעֵר

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    YOU SOUND LIKE CALVIN!

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *Luke 14:26* If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters-yes, even their own life-such a person cannot be my disciple אִישׁ כִּי־יָבוֹא אֵלַי וְלֹא יִשְׂנָא אֶת־אָבִיו וְאֶת־אִמּוֹ וְאֶת־אִשְׁתּוֹ וְאֶת־בָּנָיו וְאֶת־אֶחָיו וְאֶת־אַחְיֹתָיו וְאַף גַּם־אֶת־נַפְשׁוֹ לֹא יוּכַל לִהְיוֹת תַּלְמִידִי.

  • @Counterpoint_Apologetics
    @Counterpoint_Apologetics10 ай бұрын

    Shem is not Melchizedek.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    They are the same person. His 2 letter name is even an abbreviation for melech shalem/ King of Shalem. Plus the dates in genesis show us he was alive them plus it makes the most sense for it to be him. You have no reason to say it isn't other than christian nonsense from hebrews.

  • @Counterpoint_Apologetics

    @Counterpoint_Apologetics

    10 ай бұрын

    @@goldengun9970 the dates in Genesis prove even more so it was not him. Sept says longer life span for people as does other witnesses including Samaritan Pentateuch and Josephus. The Masoretic removes 100 years from several people. It also messes up the chronology of the Bible to related events such as the flood, tower of Babel, population growth numbers etc.... So no it's not Shem. Which your last point also shows a bias of why you would accept numbers that do not make sense.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    ​@Counterpoint_Apologetics the masoretic text only adds vowels marks and musical notes to the text. Doesn't even change one letter. You aren't making sense

  • @JohnWaki-nn4vk
    @JohnWaki-nn4vk10 ай бұрын

    God said, let US (note than one) make man in OUR (more than one) own image and likeness.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    Yep angels. For man is binary. From the earth like animals and from G-d through our nostrils. Note it doesn't say let us there when making stuff on the other days just for man

  • @NatoshaMarzucco
    @NatoshaMarzucco11 ай бұрын

    Who is the priest forever?💔 You Jews will find out after the Christian Is judged with plagues like those of Moses. Get ready for Yahweh your God.

  • @jeffyeekl2144
    @jeffyeekl214411 ай бұрын

    How do we know that Sarai was barren since she wasn't married and could not conceived during her marriage?

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    11 ай бұрын

    Lol because it says so directly in genesis 11:30

  • @ChrisMassey-gn6yp
    @ChrisMassey-gn6yp11 ай бұрын

    Why are non Christians so comfortable with atheists constantly referring to Jews as fictional people? To me it's ao annoying.

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    Why are you preaching abominational idolatry on a monotheistic channel? You don’t think we find that to be even more annoying?

  • @davisuehara3528
    @davisuehara352811 ай бұрын

    MELCHZADEK WAS NOT SHEM. THAT IS TRADITION.

  • @Mark4Jesus
    @Mark4Jesus10 ай бұрын

    Shem being Melchizedek is plausible but only human theory and not from the Bible.

  • @Mark4Jesus

    @Mark4Jesus

    10 ай бұрын

    Abram was called by God before the recorded meeting with Melchizedek.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    The Torah does make it plausible. The ages and numbers it gives has them alive at the same time

  • @Mark4Jesus

    @Mark4Jesus

    10 ай бұрын

    @@goldengun9970 Yes. Shem was alive for like 6-7 generations of offspring later, I recall doing the math once. Amazing!

  • @Mark4Jesus

    @Mark4Jesus

    10 ай бұрын

    @@goldengun9970I think the point is though that it seems dicey to just assert Shem was Melchizedek as if it were a matter of fact. I guess from the mind of an orthodox jew, the Mishnah &c are just as authoritative as the written Torah.

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    10 ай бұрын

    @@Mark4Jesus it makes the most sense that it was Shem. Plus the more you learn and relearn the text year after year you find lots of other clues. For example Shem is 2 letters in hebrew which are the first 2 letters of melech and tzedek which is his name which means king and righteous. We have plenty more than that as well.

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *Luke 19:27* But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them-bring them here and kill them in front of me. אֲבָל אֶת־אֹיְבַי הָהֵם אֲשֶׁר מְאָסוּנִי מִמְּלֹךְ עֲלֵיהֶם הָבִיאוּ אֹתָם הֵנָּה וְהִרְגוּ אֹתָם לְפָנָי

  • @freehermanjose5816

    @freehermanjose5816

    11 ай бұрын

    Please, mate, go to a Christian channel. You will not "save souls" here. Worship your Jewish guy and leave us alone.

  • @paulc3307

    @paulc3307

    11 ай бұрын

    Leyla, your fairy tales have no relevance here.

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@paulc3307They do 🙃

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    with what? Burnt on the stake?

  • @Leyla_Bat_Murrah
    @Leyla_Bat_Murrah11 ай бұрын

    *Romans 3:7* For if the truth of God has increased through my *LIE* to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? כִּי אִם־בְּכָזְבִי תִּרְבֶּה וְתִפְרֹץ אֲמִתּוֹ שֶׁל אֱלֹקִים לִתְהִלָּה לוֹ לָמָּה אֶשָּׁפֵט עוֹד כְּחוֹטֵא

  • @user-ln5il4un3x

    @user-ln5il4un3x

    11 ай бұрын

    🙄

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    Paul lied and lied.. dont be anywhere near Paul on Judgment day!

  • @user-ln5il4un3x

    @user-ln5il4un3x

    11 ай бұрын

    @@fidelcatsro6948 Paul might've been a fictitious character invented by the Romans to help them win the Judean Roman war.

  • @-Fuzz-Buzz
    @-Fuzz-Buzz11 ай бұрын

    There is no historical or Biblical basis for this belief that the Trinity was invented in the 4th century a view not held by any serious scholars or historians.

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    .....Harper Collins Bible Encyclopedia states: the Trinity doctrine is not found in OT or NT of the Bible.......... ...New Catholic Encyclopedia quote on the trinity :''the formula itself does not reflect the immediate conciousness of the period of origins''...''among the epistolic fathers there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective'' .....Tertulian, a.k.a Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, (b.155 - d.240) an African from Roman province of Carthage, an author and lawyer in 220AD started/came up with the trinity doctrine concept...later adopted by Athanasius (b.296-d.373) and used in draftingg Nicene and Athansasian creeds. Unlike many Church fathers, he was never recognized as a saint by the Eastern or Western catholic tradition churches, as several of his teachings on issues such as the clear subordination of the Son and Spirit to the Father, and his condemnation of remarriage for widows and of fleeing from persecution, contradicted the teachings of these traditions. Athanasius, the founder of the trinity doctrine (3 PERSON 1 SUBSTANCE) *himself had doubts of his findings as he revealed on his dying years that the more he thought about it the less sense it made to him* .........357AD Council of Sirmium, Bishops assembly declared Jesus is NOT the same substance of God NO MORE EXCUSE TO BE TRINITARIAN AMIGO!

  • @goldengun9970

    @goldengun9970

    11 ай бұрын

    He didn't say it was invented then.

  • @mooshei8165

    @mooshei8165

    11 ай бұрын

    Who was at the council of Nicaea? Jews or gentiles?

  • @ToviaSinger1

    @ToviaSinger1

    11 ай бұрын

    This is correct. The doctrine emerged in the second century and was officially adopted as orthodox in the fourth century.

  • @abc_6

    @abc_6

    11 ай бұрын

    @@jjphank 😂😂

  • @kemeticmonk6416
    @kemeticmonk641611 ай бұрын

    I wanna correct a historical error its not agreed by any historian which monotheistic religion came first as zoroastrianisms dating either is 600 bce or possibly 5000bce but there also seems to be Akhenaten's religion which was close to monothesim which came around 1400BCE You could technically argue that the only actual true monotheism religion is Islam sense all other monotheism religion claim to have a creator of evil meaning god didnt create everything, however Islam suffers very horribly with the problem of good and evil. Also Israelites didnt practice monothesim until after 700bce "Bless be to yhwh and his asherah" (this was inscribed by Uriyahu on a tablet that dates sometime before the 700 bce and around 800bce) Also claiming Hinduism is idolatry.. Ya to a jew but to a gnostic you guys could be worshipping a evil god who wants to over take the world..

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    Amarna theology was monolatrous pantheism, not monotheism and it had no influence of Israelites despite all the ink spilled trying to somehow to connect the two in the past, it just doesn't work anymore with contemporary Egyptological research - they're simply way too different. Also that evil was created by something other than G-d, blessed be He, doesn't mean that it's not monotheistic (there's still one and only one G-d. Please research how Judaism explains this and the interactions between human free will and evil). Even in Islam, there is the devil and demons and such. G-d doesn't have to create everything for there to be only one G-d. Israelites practiced monotheism from the get-go, but many dropped into idolatry (G-d forbid), as it literally says in the Torah itself and is confirmed by archeological findings in relevant sites which show presence of idolatry there. Gnostics are utterly irrelevant here and just because they believe their nonsense doesn't mean it has any actual validity - they've been utterly crushed over the centuries. Hope this clarifies a few things.

  • @kemeticmonk6416

    @kemeticmonk6416

    11 ай бұрын

    @@disassembledpurity Amarna Religion is not agreed by scholars if it monotheism or monolatrous pantheism, Also if something other then Yhwh created something then judaism is no longer a monotheistic religion or at least its not true monotheism sense that would mean you have another god or being that created something. Meaning yhwh didnt created everything meaning you technically have another being or "god" but just worship one god over the rest... which is monolatrous pantheism if anything.. Also we have the angels as well... However in Islam its very clear in the dogma that Allah created evil (though if you ask me any religion that claims good and evil is created is false sense those are just concepts and perspectives not things) also its Jinn which are different to a point then demons. Also there is 0 evidence that Israelites practices monotheism before 700bce all the claims in the scripture comes after. We have pottery, inscriptions and poetry that all predate 700BCE which do not have any monotheistic beliefs in them. And also Yhwh is not even the god he was now in the beginning. He was associated with the storm and war in the earliest text we have of him (The shashu of Yhwh) and yes the torah.. wrote by people who didnt like the tradition and wanted monotheism would write theses people where being idolatry worshippers and that those who followed monotheism where the only correct people. In fact many scholars believe that the reason for this switch was for a abusive power and to put all of Israel under one temple. No difference between monotheism and totalitarianisms Also I can revers the gnostic claim onto you Jewish belief have no relevance here because its been debunked many times Not only do we have 0 good evidence for any of the books of Moses but we have even littler for Abraham and even less for the exodus claim. Almost none of the stories in the Torah or tenkh can be back by any historical data and even claims like canaanites committing child sacrifice is unsupported by any data and was often times just what the jews would say to people they didnt like. My example for using gnostics was when he makes a rude claim that hindus are idolaters and uses it in a derogatory way he cant say that because to other people (the gnostics) hes worshipping a evil god who wants to abuse him Unfortunately your comment didnt help and seemed to just have misconstrued what I said

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048

    @hrvatskinoahid1048

    11 ай бұрын

    @@kemeticmonk6416 The Jewish people have an unbroken historical tradition to the very time of Moses.

  • @disassembledpurity

    @disassembledpurity

    11 ай бұрын

    @@kemeticmonk6416 I'm sorry but this is just nonsensical. > Amarna Religion is not agreed by scholars if it monotheism or monolatrous pantheism, I told you that its monolatrous pantheism. Case closed. > Also if something other then Yhwh created something then judaism is no longer a monotheistic religion or at least its not true monotheism sense that would mean you have another god or being that created something. Meaning yhwh didnt created everything meaning you technically have another being or "god" but just worship one god over the rest... which is monolatrous pantheism if anything.. Also we have the angels as well... Already explained. You don't understand what monotheism is and there are clearly no other "gods". There is 1 G-d, blessed be He, who is worshipped. > However in Islam its very clear in the dogma that Allah created evil (though if you ask me any religion that claims good and evil is created is false sense those are just concepts and perspectives not things) also its Jinn which are different to a point then demons. Not necessarily true. Many forms of Islam don't claim this. > Also there is 0 evidence that Israelites practices monotheism before 700bce all the claims in the scripture comes after. We have pottery, inscriptions and poetry that all predate 700BCE which do not have any monotheistic beliefs in them. And also Yhwh is not even the god he was now in the beginning. He was associated with the storm and war in the earliest text we have of him (The shashu of Yhwh) Incorrect. See the work of Falk, 2023. The shasu thing is a total meme and has been utterly refuted by now. Please keep up with the scholarship. > and yes the torah.. wrote by people who didnt like the tradition and wanted monotheism would write theses people where being idolatry worshippers and that those who followed monotheism where the only correct people. In fact many scholars believe that the reason for this switch was for a abusive power and to put all of Israel under one temple. No difference between monotheism and totalitarianisms I don't even know what to say here. I have no time for your schizo delusions and speculations. There was no tradition for these people, and they are correct to claim that only monotheism is true. Also, this switch happened way before any government was established so its a nonsensical claim. And clearly you don't understand totalitarianism since a) Neo-Assyrian Empire was far more totalitarian for example than was the United monarchy and b) the United monarchy was far more decentralized than you may realize. This is just pure and maximal detachment from any reality on your end and there's no evidence to actually support your claim, especially with an all-loving and good G-d, blessed be He. > Also I can revers the gnostic claim onto you Jewish belief have no relevance here because its been debunked many times Except that it hasn't been debunked. See the blockchain-Torah comparison and why that is a mathematical impossibility. Also read some work of Islamic philosophers and the like who explain why gnosticism is a logical impossibility as well. > Not only do we have 0 good evidence for any of the books of Moses but we have even littler for Abraham and even less for the exodus claim. Almost none of the stories in the Torah or tenkh can be back by any historical data and even claims like canaanites committing child sacrifice is unsupported by any data and was often times just what the jews would say to people they didnt like. Already explain above. Exodus is conclusively proven if one actually has any ability to read the text in its ANE context. Moreover, we actually have evidence and can even date Abraham, peace be upon him, c. 18th century BCE. You really need to start reading. Seriously. In fact, there is widespread evidence that child sacrifice was practiced in the ANE. Jews were right to chastise them since they were pure evil. And in fact, most stories (actually depending on the argument, you could claim that ALL stories in the Tanakh are purely historically based). > My example for using gnostics was when he makes a rude claim that hindus are idolaters and uses it in a derogatory way he cant say that because to other people (the gnostics) hes worshipping a evil god who wants to abuse him Not a rude claim (and that's also irrelevant as well). Many, if not most Hindus are idolaters. > Unfortunately your comment didnt help and seemed to just have misconstrued what I said I understood exactly what you said. Also the purpose of my comment was never to be of any help to you (although perhaps if you had literacy skills, you would've realized why you're wrong).

  • @kemeticmonk6416

    @kemeticmonk6416

    11 ай бұрын

    @@hrvatskinoahid1048 to make a claim like that will need evidence of it. And tradition means nothing if its been rewrote. Please provide historical evidence

  • @LassieSgr
    @LassieSgr11 ай бұрын

    The fallen ones were not angles or gods. They were the powerful men in control

  • @fidelcatsro6948

    @fidelcatsro6948

    11 ай бұрын

    Obtuse, Acute or Right Angled?