Barry and Peter two men ahead of their time.

Remember when Barry Scheck called Fung out on his sloppy police work and told him How about THAT Mr. Fung!

@fjr3950

2 ай бұрын

Yes, that sticks in my mind. Was a running joke in our house for years.

@SlowerRiot

24 күн бұрын

cash me outside how bout dat mr fung!

charlie rose was not only a terrible interviewer who loved to hear himself talk he was exposed as a sexual predator and lost his job - thank God!

@laurencewhite4809

4 ай бұрын

And O.J. Simpson is a murderer who like a murderer sociopath wrote wrote "If I did it".

@brendoncassidy1316

2 ай бұрын

And Barry as Scheck set a sexual predator and murder free

@roddydykes7053

2 ай бұрын

Kk

Berry Scheck is one of the greatest lawyers ever.

@CarsonDouglas

3 ай бұрын

He a shark dog. He pounces all over sloppy cases. Sloppy police and cover ups. The gig is up with him. He worth every penny.

@bobnichols3233

2 ай бұрын

During the trial, I couldn’t stand him. However, if I needed a good lawyer, I’d definitely give him a call!

@CarsonDouglas

2 ай бұрын

@@bobnichols3233 why ? Because he was aggressively outting stone cold bigots ? This is one time racism did not work in the police favor. The begged to have the case moved, Ito was not about to help the state collude. He was guilty. Fuhrman blew it.

@bekreto

2 ай бұрын

@@CarsonDouglas No he was not. If he did why Police framed him ? Why they planted evidence in his home ??

Charlie Rose interrupts them way too much... Scheck and Neufeld have to work hard to finish their sentences. That's not good hosting etiquette...

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

have to disrupt and keep the narrative

New York's finest. 2 of the best that went out west.

@CarsonDouglas

3 ай бұрын

🇮🇱👍🏾

The presence of EDTA has ALWAYS been a unanswerable question by the prosecution

@mitchcumstein142

3 жыл бұрын

No, they answered it very thoroughly during both the criminal and civil trial. Their own expert testified that the levels did not match police vials.

@ShinkuGouki

Жыл бұрын

You don't have a brain. EDTA is found IN EVERYTHING. Your body has EDTA right now. Don't try to make excuses. OJ killed them that night. The way Nicole was killed......that was personal. We all know who was that angry at her. OJ said "she had it coming"

@xxxbrooklyn

Жыл бұрын

@@mitchcumstein142 keep believing that

@robskeys88

5 ай бұрын

​@@mitchcumstein142that's BS🤦‍♂️

@pommiebears

3 ай бұрын

@@robskeys88 No, it’s not. Everything you eat, what you wash your clothes in, what you paint your walls with, has EDTA in it. We all have a certain amount of EDTA in our blood, depending on our diets. Research it. Look it up.

Barry Scheck is the best forensic lawyer out there.

@dixiedeed4918

4 жыл бұрын

You know it helping innocent people get out prison he handsome too

@dixiedeed4918

4 жыл бұрын

The best o.j. owns Scheck and Nufeld his life thank God for attorneys like them

@deadastronaut2440

4 жыл бұрын

Great lier

@SUNMAYDEN518

4 жыл бұрын

not in the oj case

@SUNMAYDEN518

4 жыл бұрын

smart man but turned against him in the oj trial

Charlie Rose isn’t really listening.

Barry Scheck won O J Simpson his freedom he is one hell of a smart lawyer.

@josephswabe5584

2 жыл бұрын

It would not have happened without Stephen Singular. Great lawyer none the less.

@shwnbur77

Жыл бұрын

Agreed he was the best lawyer in that case

@Berkmugga

Жыл бұрын

@@shwnbur77 F Lee Bailey? Wtf?

@jamesmiller5331

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I felt bad for that forensics guy. The word eviscerated comes to mind.

@prettyaccordingtoshonda3611

Жыл бұрын

He was a awesome lawyer 😊

The question became is Furman capable of planting evidence. He said it himself that he had in the past. Now any person would have reasonable doubt after this testimony.

@Jim.Jim.32

2 жыл бұрын

Everything pointed to Furhman planting that glove. Fun fact - Furhman was drugged up with tranquilizers during his testimony.

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

The moment there was tape of Furman admitting he would pull over black men with white women and 'find something' to pin on them doubt was established. Not to mention gody shots only to reduce bleeding and bruising being hard to find on N words. Oh and the EDTA in the blood! This thing was a wrap long before they got the 12-0 acquittal which was the absolute correct decision EVEN IF he did it. He is innocent until proven guilty and they did not prove anything except for the desperate lengths they would go to try and convict him.

@Berkmugga

Жыл бұрын

@@Jim.Jim.32 what? Lol

@ShinkuGouki

Жыл бұрын

@@Berkmugga Yeah,this "Jim Jim" guy is in EVERY OJ video defending him without any good arguments. He must be OJs son or daughter or some relative

@Berkmugga

Жыл бұрын

@@ShinkuGouki oh he’s right Furhman definitely planted that glove and smeared the bloody glove in the bronco. I just didn’t know what head talking about with the tranquilizers and drugs. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was on drugs though Fuhrman is a total low life.

Awesome video! Its amazing how the media has buried this - and all info that puts doubt on the prosecutions case against OJ.

@JOHNNYSGIRL1960

8 жыл бұрын

Barry Scheck knows his stuff and so does Mr. Neufeld! Innocence Project?

@AtomSmash3r

6 жыл бұрын

If OJ is innocent then Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman are still alive. Maybe they eloped to a deserted island?

@AtomSmash3r

6 жыл бұрын

Yep he was an expert at being disingenuous.

@mkedmusa9416

6 жыл бұрын

KeithofRoss Right On!

@rawn4203

6 жыл бұрын

Civil jury saw thru all the bull at least.

Scheck loves the word “EXTRAORDINARY” 😂

@travisbrown6595

4 ай бұрын

Hashtag Metoo!!!

My ,RESPECT,TO THIS LOWYER, EXCELLENT JOB.

With OJs recent death I am again fascinated with this whole case

I always felt OJ was innocent.

@righteoustruthspeaker7507

3 жыл бұрын

Idiot

@infonomics

3 жыл бұрын

Felt? Interesting, I use reason. You know, deductive and inductive reasoning.

@rashun506

2 жыл бұрын

Felt? I knew he was innocent from the start.

@sofialavish1072

Жыл бұрын

I agree with you and many people are brainwashed by the media still.

@pommiebears

Жыл бұрын

Facts override your feelings

When the lawyer said a public persona and private persona Charlie Rose is the definition of this

Why is Charlie Rose so aggressive in his questioning of these distinguished lawyers ? OJ may have done it IDK but what I do know is Furhman and the LAPD particularly Furhman planted evidence and the defense proved that. So, the not guilty verdict was correct period!

@m.e.m.jr.4294

2 жыл бұрын

Your right. Btw nice pic

@Pep585

Жыл бұрын

Well said💯💯💯💯

@infonomics

Жыл бұрын

If you knew that Fuhrman planted the evidence, why didn't you offer your omniscience to the defense team! LOL, you can't even spell Fuhrman's name.

@ahmadhylick2335

Жыл бұрын

I think OJ was somehow involve or knows more than he ever let on, and I also think the LAPD planted evidence in an effort to strengthen their case!

@scottsears5545

4 ай бұрын

Kardashian who was friend of oj amd lawyer, fwot oj did it. He was never comfie with overwhelming evidence. The shies oj said he never wore..bruno...pict later showed he did wear them at a bills game.

Excellent job guys.

@ShinkuGouki

Жыл бұрын

Yeah,excellent job keeping a killer running free

@robskeys88

5 ай бұрын

​@@ShinkuGoukiNo.. excellent job💯

This whole case was nothing but a circus from the start. I have much respect for Barry Scheck who to me was very clear and honest about his professional testimony.

@mkedmusa9416

6 жыл бұрын

David White The other lawyer...Neufeld alone with Scheck...are something else...these men along with rest of dream team...did a hell of....job. They represent the best in what attorneys should be and Jewish culture to boot! Thank God for them and thank God OJ had resources and Mr. Simpson showed that he is a brilliant man...such credibility with the way in which he took care of hai family and secured his future after a successful football career......excellent demonstration of excellent upbringing...excellent demonstration of a black man in America...an American not African American ..I might add..and once again look at Charlie Rose, Matt Lauer...two misogynistic rapist..woman haters. who could not possibly believe in his evidence when in fact all those type of men so is project..their male glibness all over the place...20 plus years ..it all came out of the closet! What more do we need to discuss?

@DaniboyBR2

6 жыл бұрын

He beat her up for years then he murdered her, what a great example.

@dixiedeed4918

4 жыл бұрын

Fung got. Caught in lies he all crossed up where is it Mr fung

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

@@dixiedeed4918 haha he was saying Mr Fung to him like a bond villain about to kill someone. They were both excellent.

@Meng776

Жыл бұрын

Neufelds cross of Andrea Mizzola was good stuff.

this gus doesn't let these two talk unbelievable

Rose was so annoying continually interrupting these two legal eagles!!

@garrickgregory6403

3 жыл бұрын

He was threatened because when you get the science if this case it looked very suspicious

@strnglhld

2 жыл бұрын

@@garrickgregory6403 If anything the science makes The Juice look even more guilty

@garrickgregory6403

2 жыл бұрын

@@strnglhld It was tampered with. Science Evidence started contradicts the case EDTA in the blood at 2000 ppm which is not in food and is dangerous, blood splatter shows there was no ankle in the socks as three wet transfers occurred . There was blood evidence that was even lost like Andrea Mazzola’s bindles that dates and initials never made it to lab. There was evidence that pointed away from him. Blood under the nails didn’t match , fingerprints at the scene didn’t match , and unidentified Caucasian male hair was found on the Rockingham Glove yet none of Simpson’s limb hairs were found in any of them .

@trumpforKing808

Жыл бұрын

​@I whoever killed them must have been covered in blood. So OJ kills his wife and friend, cleans up, gets ready for his flight, gets there on time...do you know black people? 😂 wtf

@allendebono3460

Жыл бұрын

Charlie Rose was known for that

Charlie Rose had the best theme music.

This was the most "this are not the droids you are looking for" interview ever, this guys could blame global warming on surfers and get away with it in court

@joeljameson4961

3 ай бұрын

Evidence is a hell of a thing tho isn't it?

@johnscanlon2598

2 ай бұрын

Specifically farts from surfers

They accomplished raising reasonably doubt! Not guilty. Goodnight 😴

@pommiebears

4 жыл бұрын

Marc Ryan only to idiots. Anyone with a working brain cell could see through their BS.

@Autshot20

4 жыл бұрын

Not guilty does not represent innocent. Yes not guilty, primarily because a detective used the N word and then denied it. That makes sense.

@treykennon1795

3 жыл бұрын

Not guilty not guilty police stop setting up people

@Ken-iu2zp

2 жыл бұрын

@@pommiebears You are EXTREMELY racist. I say this because blood was planted, the lead detecrive was a racist, OJ did not have life and death wounds on his body that was indicative of a 15 minute struggle, his gloves didn't fit, and there's 4 more decisive factors i could list. Now despite this, and in the face of this your mind can't accept that a Black man didn't kill those 2...

@marcryan1974

2 жыл бұрын

The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense. Reasonable doubt was proven and is why OJ is free today…

that furniture is timeless

Clark was told about Furhman by Coleman and a detective Perdy. She told Coleman she was just trying to ruin her case.

Great lawyers. These the guys you want on your side.

@brocktonma.1816

2 жыл бұрын

If you have the money.

@mikey65dean

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t know how they can sleep at night knowing they got a double murderer off

@seanadams6879

2 жыл бұрын

@@brocktonma.1816 They created one of the largest pro bono firms. look up the innocence project.

@seanadams6879

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikey65dean it's Clarke and Darden who can't sleep at night when they think of this trial.

@Ken-iu2zp

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikey65dean Your racism just won't allow you to accept he was innocent....

36:08 This Charlie was unbelievable…asking stupid questions!! 🤦

How did Charlie stay on so long? He is a terrible interviewer and he constantly interrupts the guest. He over talks as well. Hard to watch this.

The Jury Instruction says: The defendant is accused in courts one and two of having committed the crime of murder, a violation of Penal Code Section 187. Every person who unlawfully kills a human being with malice aforethought is guilty of the crime of murder, in violation of Section 187 of the California Penal Code. In order to prove such crime, each of the following elements must be proved one, a human being was killed, two, the killing was unlawful, and, three, the killing was done with malice aforethought. The prosecution has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crimes charged in the information and that the defendant was the perpetrator of any such charged crimes. The defendant is not required to prove himself innocent or to prove that any other person committed the crimes charged. Evidence has been received for the purpose of showing that the defendant was not present at the time and place of the commission of the alleged crime for which he is here on trial. If, after a consideration of all the evidence, you have a reasonable doubt that the defendant was present at the time the crime was committed, you must find him not guilty. In the crimes charged in counts one and two, there must exist a union or joint operation of act or conduct and a certain specific intent or mental state in the mind of the perpetrator. Unless such specific intent and/or mental state exists, the crime to which they relate is not committed. An inference is a deduction of fact that may logically and reasonably be drawn from another fact or group of facts established by the evidence. Further, each fact which is essential to complete a set of circumstances necessary to establish the defendant's guilt, must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. In other words, before an inference essential to establish guilt may be found to have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, each fact or circumstance upon which such inference necessarily rests, must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Elements of the crime of murder that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: [Motive is not an element in this case]. 1. A human being was killed - Self Evident 2. The killing was unlawful - Self Evident 3. MENS REA: The killing was done with malice aforethought - intentional and premeditated. 4. ACTUS REUS: The defendant killed the two victims and is the perpetrator of the crime. Further, the defendant was present at the time and place of the commission of the alleged crime for which he is here on trial For Actus Reus the Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt the following: 1. The inference (STORY LINE or THEORY ABOUT HOW THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE CRIME) essential to establish guilt of the Defendant must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. However, before an inference (STORY LINE or THEORY ABOUT HOW THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE CRIME) essential to establish guilt of the Defendant may be found to have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, EACH FACT or circumstance upon which such inference necessarily rests, must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. 3. Further, the Defendant was present at the time and place of the commission of the alleged crime for which he is on trial. The Defendant must not have a valid ALIBI. FACTS or circumstances upon which the inference (STORY LINE or THEORY ABOUT HOW THE DEFENDANT COMMITTED THE CRIME) necessarily rests which must be proved individually beyond reasonable doubt are the following: 1. The middle finger of OJ’s left hand was cut at the crime scene as the result of a violent struggle with either Nicole or Ron. Blood came out of this injured finger. Many witnesses who were never impeached testified not having seen any cut or bandage and blood dripping from his left hand middle finger. 2. OJ Blood was found at the crime scene: Bundy Walkway and the rear gate. The DNA of the blood samples at the Walkway were consumed by the microorganism which grew exponentially in numbers because the wet swabs were exposed to heat since the truck has no air-conditioning. This renders the blood samples at the Bundy walkway compromised evidence and susceptible to cross-contamination with OJ's blood which actually spilled when Yamauchi opened the collecting tube on the same table where the evidentiary blood samples was located. The blood found at the rear gate has EDTA and is not deteriorated despite having been allegedly unnoticed for 3 week. Also the blood was not in the video recorded the day after the crime was committed suggesting strongly that the blood was planted using the missing 1.5 ml of the reference blood sample of OJ 3. Blood of OJ, Nicole and Ron in the Bronco when OJ’s hands with his two victim’s blood were found on various locations inside his Bronco.The number of blood smears increased in number on the console and the same LAPD personnel who were present at the crime scene also entered the Ford Bronco after the incident transferring the blood from Bundy to the Bronco. 4. Upon reaching his residence OJ passed through the alleyway located at the perimeter and accidentally bumped his head on the air-conditioning unit and consequently he dropped his right hand glove with the blood of the two victims and his own blood. This evidence is very suspicious because: Fresh blood on the glove which should have been dried, The undisturbed leaves surronding the glove, The absence of blood drops on the alleyway, The gloves did not fit OJ, OJ's face was unmarked indicating he did not hit the air conditioning unit producing the 3 thumping sounds heard by Kato Kaelin The bloody right hand glove was planted by M Fuhrman. 5. Blood of OJ on his driveway. OJ claimed the blood drops came out from the hidden cuts on the sides of his fingers left hand) which was probably caused by pinching the golf chips. 6. OJ left the bloody sock in his room with the blood of Nicole which tainted his sock during the time when he was allegedly slashing the throat of Nicole. The blood on the sock had EDTA not normally found in the blood but EDTA is a blood preservative added into the collecting tube. The blood penetrated 3 surfaces which could not have happened when the blood splashed onto the sock while OJ was wearing it. The sock also has no sand particle which must have been aplenty if indeed there was a life and death struggle between Ron and OJ. The sock was also not present prior to each appearance hours later in a video clip suggesting strongly that it was planted evidence. Therefore, if anyone of the facts mentioned above is not proved beyond reasonable doubt or stating it in another way, if the Prosecution failed to defeat or overcome the reasonable doubt in just one fact mentioned above then the inference or STORY LINE or THEORY of the Prosecution must be rejected and the Defendant must be acquitted. The Defense was able to present reasonable doubt on each and every facts upon which the inference (STORY LINE or THEORY) necessarily rests but on the other hand the Prosecution was unable to overcome all of them. Further, the Defense was able to present unimpeachable witnesses which established the TIMELINE showing OJ just did not have enough time to commit the crime. The testimony of Alan, the Limo Driver, was shown to be too inconsistent on the major points. He failed to see the parked vehicle of Kato when it was established that indeed Kato's car was parked along Ashroft Street. It can then be concluded that he failed also to see the parked Bronco of OJ along Rockingham Street. He saw a second vehicle parked behind the Bentley when in fact Arnel's car was parked after OJ left his Rockingham residence. This is a clear case of FATIGUE very common to drivers. This alone is enough to justify OJ's acquittal.

@Jim.Jim.32

4 жыл бұрын

Excellent analysis based on FACTS, you are spot on. With regard to #5, there where 5-6 driveway drops of OJ blood leading from the bronco to his front door. Since there was NO chronological record as to when these drops where accounted for or discovered, a more reasonable assumption would be that these drops where planted by Vannater (or someone) using OJ's reference vial and a syringe. Vannater had OJs blood in his pocket by 3pm at OJs estate that day. These driveway drops where not tested for EDTA, however there was no splatter pattern and they "dropped from a height of 2 feet". When the blood vial was booked into evidence the next day, we find the 1.5ccs missing. Low and behold, six months later we have the nurse who drew the OJ blood conveniently changing his testimony saying he did not draw the standard 8ccs (not under oath..but in a home video!). Oj wasn't at that crime scene and that's all there is to it. Furhman planted that glove, the LAPD went all in. The question is WHY did LAPD frame Simpson? It is my belief that Lang and Vannater knew that Furhman probably planted the glove. They where forced to frame OJ otherwise how the hell would they explain the glove? If it was shown that a black celebrity like OJ Simpson was, in fact, framed by one of their rogue detectives, the city would burn and the LAPD would cease to exist. They LAPD got lucky because if Ojs flight was just 45 minutes earlier there would be no trial of the century.

@SUNMAYDEN518

4 жыл бұрын

not according to me it isnt--oj how horrible scrapes with his ex. what about the dna evidence?

@ImNotNotAllCityChi

3 жыл бұрын

@@SUNMAYDEN518 you didn’t read any of the post did you? This is the best explanation of what happened including the comment above yours

@garethwilby4033

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jim.Jim.32 show me proof that fuhrman planted the glove,I’ll wait patiently.....

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

@@garethwilby4033 The defense do not need to prove anything, they just need to show that there is doubt with the prosecution case. I think this is what people miss, they think one side has to prove him guilty and the other side proves him innocent. No, he is innocent until proven guilty beyond any doubt and there was/is plenty of doubt all over the place. Furhman had a history of booking innocent people and found the glove and was alone when he found it. Did he plant it? Who knows? IS there now a suspicion that he planted it? Sure there is.

Barry Scheck is counting them ducketts. You know these two got that paper.

Cochran and these 2 lawyers set oj free very smart ,intelligent lawyers 👌

@pommiebears

2 жыл бұрын

With no conscience whatsoever. Barry Shceck refuses to now answer if OJ is guilty. He says that it doesn’t matter. Lol.

@treykennon1795

2 жыл бұрын

@@pommiebears he did answer your just not listening lol

@Ken-iu2zp

2 жыл бұрын

@@treykennon1795 pay her no mind. She's just a older racist lady. She can't use her mind because the racism she suffers from gets in the way of her being objective.

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

@@pommiebears which is the correct answer, he cannot prove that oj is guilty

Charles got his biased ass handed to him

@goddessracheltarotmistress11

10 ай бұрын

I watched this when it first aired. He was shitting his pants out of sheer frustration. He was rude and unprofessional.

S check is admirable when he helps to free innocent people BUT when he uses his skills to free a murderer that is repulsive

Barry Scheck & Peter Neufeld are both smart lawyers who did a great job. I had no doubt in mind after watching the unedited OJ's trial.

@TheClash122

4 ай бұрын

And I have no doubt in mind after watching the unedited trial that OJ did it.

Mr Rose love to ask questions but he didn't answer the question of the woman who that said he fondled them smfh then he resigned

9:00 It just so happens that Furman had a set of gloves on him with OKs blood , set one at one scene , the other one at his estate ,which , was a matching set . The wool over the eyes of the jury was by the Defense , paid well to elivate their career . Remember this evidence was being collected all within 4 hours of the arrival to the crime scene . OJ s blood from him was not collected by a nurse til much later as he arrived from Chicago , these were being secured to crime scene specialist could tag and bag the evidence. Officers do not touch any evidence , it’s done by experts . The timeline is documented .

OJ was a great RB

@Michael-pf8we

3 жыл бұрын

The greatest fullback nobody talks about. He holds records that cant be broken.

Rose seemed obsessed with Scheck in this interview.

@echrder3572

8 жыл бұрын

Well hes clearly the smart one...

@lisellesloan3191

8 жыл бұрын

Scheck is making the most contentious remarks and interrupting Rose, so it's only natural that he would talk to him the most, plus he seems to be the more talkative of the two.

@adams1458

7 жыл бұрын

Barry Scheck is one of the greatest defense attorneys of all time

@mkedmusa9416

6 жыл бұрын

nomibe2911 Rose is inferior. and that is so obvious..and meanwhile. back then. I love watching his show but I did not watch this episode in real time at the time..

@Odawg292002

2 ай бұрын

Scheck was clearly in his feelings about helping a murderer get off.

8:55 - 9:23 Why was the photo of Fuhrman pointing at the glove at 4 am significant? How does that show that Furhman planted the glove on OJ's property?

@Waltjoh100

6 жыл бұрын

HombresGotNoName the glove was pointed at before he went to oj house & found the other glove

@flunder50

4 жыл бұрын

Fuhrman was trying to make sure he showed there was only 1 glove at the crime scene because he was planting the other one

@johnscanlon2598

2 ай бұрын

@@flunder50cops always point to what specifically in the photograph is important , look it up you will find thousands with the similar pointing hand gesture, this is nothing

Cochran, Scheck, Bailey & Nuefeld were the stars of the Dream Team.

When you want Saul Goodman, you call these clowns.

Peter Neufeld = Will Farrell doppleganger

This is hard to follow. Too much interrupting going on.

It's worth watching these guys in court in the OJ Simpson case. Also rI read the 2nd court cases evidence that is interesting for the statements by Nicole's best friend Cora Fischman. Also the Furhman tapes, yikes. OJ came across there well in his deposition. Honest about his relationship with Nicole.

Is that charlie the guy oj talks about

@GnomeChomsky9999

2 ай бұрын

Charlie knows OJ is guilty because he was there.

Why did the investigation searching for a murderer stop the day after the verdict ?

@Jim.Jim.32

4 жыл бұрын

Oj and his team actually put up a 500k reward and set up a tip line. The lapd did not help for obvious reasons

@Meng776

4 жыл бұрын

And they won't allow a modern review of the evidence. It's because people want to believe that the police wouldn't plant evidence.

@milart12

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jim.Jim.32 So no one came forward with 500K as an inducement? MMM, I wonder why?

@garethwilby4033

3 жыл бұрын

Because they found the real killer,tried him in court and then the racist jury let him go as payback for that lowlife Rodney King

@pommiebears

Жыл бұрын

They put up a reward because they knew they’d never have to pay it…..because OJ did it! Lol.

If you think Fuhrman planted the glove Than you must think Fuhrman planted the Bruno Magli shoes on OJ Feet

@csdr0

7 жыл бұрын

Use the Abduction Method of Reasoning which is the "Inference to the Best Explanation" to explain the following facts. 1. The right hand glove was still wet with blood almost 6 hours 45 minutes after allegedly having been dropped by OJ. If OJ planted the glove then the blood should have been completely dried by that time. 10:45 PM June 12 to 5:30 AM. 2. There was no blood on the ground around it which should have been consistent with the accidental dropping of the right hand glove drenched with blood of both Nicole and Ron. Thus, it must have been carefully placed there. 3. There were no blood drops along the driveway going to the alleyway and in the alleyway itself despite the Prosecution's allegation that OJ was bleeding with a cut on his left hand middle finger. Conveniently Marcia Clark claimed that the bleeding stopped at that time and resumed when OJ was about to go inside the house. 4. There was a hair of the underbelly of the dog Kato which could have been attached to the glove only when the glove is lying down the ground. Thus, it must have come from the ground at Bundy. 5. The same police officers who reported that they saw only one glove at Bundy also reported that the picture of Fuhrman pointing to the left hand glove was taken 7:00 AM when in fact it was taken 4:30 AM nighttime. What is the significance of this lie by the police officers and Fuhrman? If they reported the time at 7:00 AM then they can say it would have been impossible for Fuhrman to have taken the right hand glove at Bundy and planted it at OJ's residence since Fuhrman could not have second guessed what glove would be left at Bundy since the impression would be that he went to OJ's residence first. Thus, MF was lying when he said he did not plant the right hand glove at the alleyway. 6. Fuhrman has a coat and plastic bag (a standard issue to detectives) to store the right hand glove without anyone seeing him carrying the glove from Bundy to OJ's residence. The glove inside the plastic bag would have preserved the wetness of the blood since it is not exposed to the atmosphere causing quick drying. 7. Fuhrman saw the right hand glove at the alleyway and reported he went there the morning after the murder. He went to at the alleyway when he was supposed not to be searching for evidence as he has no search warrant yet at that time. 8. On the other hand there was no evidence or testimony to show that OJ was in the alleyway at the night of the murder. 9. OJ had no bruishes on his head putting doubt on Clark's allegation that he bumped his head against the air-conditioner thrice. The noise could have been the compressor. It would have been very unlikely that OJ persisted in moving forward thrice after the first time he allegedly bumped his head on the aircon unit. 10. Fuhrman was exposed as a liar having said the n-word and being heard on the audio tape uttering statements only a genocidal racist could have said and who planted evidence in the past. There are only two options: Either Mark Fuhrman or OJ planted the bloody right hand glove at the alleyway. The best explanation that can explain all the above evidence or facts of the case is that MF got the bloody right hand glove at Bundy and planted it at OJ's residence. Sherlock Holmes once said, "If you eliminate the impossible whatever remains no matter however improbable must be the truth." It's so elementary my dear Watson!

@adams1458

7 жыл бұрын

i think LAPD mishandled the DNA, therefore i would not convict a man to death because in this country you are innocent until proven guilty and it wasn't PROVEN he killed her with the DNA because it's tainted, it's garbage. I would not convict OJ to die, just like i would not convict you if it were you Johnny.

@dougstyles5091

7 жыл бұрын

Johnny Jack u mean the ones that weren't ojs size?

@franis6346

7 жыл бұрын

Did you plant any evidence in this case? Mark Furman took the 5f. Why?

@mitchcumstein142

6 жыл бұрын

Fuhrman pleaded the 5th for every question they asked him that day, not just that one question. He decided to shut down because he got busted lying about using the n-word. If they would have asked him if he was an LAPD officer, he would have also pleaded the 5th. Look at the video of him doing it; he's looking at his lawyer and his lawyer is just instructing him to plead the 5th to every question. That isn't an indicator that he planted evidence.

Great attorneys

*"OJ didn't do it, but it's not our job to find the real killer! Also, we have evidence that OJ is innocent, but due to attorney privilege we cannot tell you about it"* Lol, all these guys did in this hour long interview is convince me even more than ever that OJ is guilty.

@josephswabe5584

Жыл бұрын

The criminalist that collected the blood evidence at the crime scene testified that she put her initials on the bindles that were supposed to be sent to CellMark to identify the killers DNA. Low and behold, none of the bindles that arrived at CellMark had any initials on them. So what happened to the blood evidence that was collected at the crime scene?

@rayali9854

Жыл бұрын

had to flush the toilet on this one

@pommiebears

3 ай бұрын

@@josephswabe5584I suppose Vannatter, Lang, and Furhman, wore size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, and trampled through the evidence too lol! I suppose they also thought “oh, I’d love to set up a person of color…..I know, let’s set OJ Simpson up, even though it’s going to be heavily scrutinised and he can afford the very best lawyers, yes, we’re going to set up OJ Simpson and see if we get away with it” 😂

@ImRacistTowardsBlacks

3 ай бұрын

@@pommiebearsBut what about the blood under Nicole’s nails not matching OJ’s?

Fuhrman shouldn't have denied saying the n-word. Back then it wasn't the worst word in the world that only black Americans could use. It's so silly to behave that way about a word. I have never used it outside of reading or repeating it but he would've been believed if he hadn't lied about it. But after Rodney King no one in Los Angeles could touch that, especially in the LAPD. It's so silly. Words are words. That's free speech. Just being polite is what used to control our speech and not some bizarre thing like "hate speech". The wrong people get accused of such a thing.

Blood Oath by Steven Worth

This interview is very different from the recent interview Barry did with Ezra Edelman. In the Ezra interview, Barry wouldn't answer the questions when he was asked if he thinks the LAPD planted evidence or if all the blood evidence had been cross-contaminated. I don't think Charlie knew all the specifics but he should of pushed back when they said the glove, the sock, the Bronco blood, and the Bundy blood drops were all of the evidence. There were fresh blood drops identified as OJ's in his driveway and in his foyer as well. Also, the EDTA thing is being deliberately misrepresented by Scheck/Neufeld and is misunderstood by most people. The test for EDTA on the sock blood and the blood on the back gate came back in the individual parts per million. The reference sample blood had EDTA in the parts per thousand. That's a 3 orders of magnitude difference. Charlie should've brought this up. The defense never tried to argue that any blood other than the blood on the sock and the back gate came from the reference sample because all of those other blood samples had already been collected/identified by the time OJ's blood was drawn. The only reason they were able to allege the blood on the sock and back gate had been planted was because they were not discovered until several weeks later. The defense argued that every single one of the other OJ blood samples (Bundy pathway, in/on Bronco, in his driveway, in his foyer) had all degraded and been cross contaminated in the LAPD lab. I hope everybody would agree that this is highly unlikely that every single one of the real killers blood samples had degraded and been cross contaminated with OJ's reference sample blood, causing a false positive. To believe OJ is innocent, you have to believe the following: 1. Fuhrman found a second glove at Bundy and planted it at Rockingham and all of the police officers who were on the scene before Furhman either didn't see it or lied about there being two. 2. All of the killer's blood drops found on the first day had degraded and due to sloppy work by Colin Yamaguchi, every one had been cross-contaminated with OJ's blood. 3. OJ's reference blood was planted on the back gate of Bundy and the sock and for a reason unbeknownst to science, the concentration of EDTA reduced by a factor of 1,000, causing the EDTA levels to be consistent with the levels of Roger Martz's own blood (he tested his own). 4. OJ, by coincidence, owned the exact same type and size of very rare shoes as the killer and could not account for his. 5. Nicole, by coincidence, had bought the exact same type and size of gloves as used by the killer and they could not be accounted for. 6. OJ, by coincidence, had hair that matched that of the killer. 7. OJ, by coincidence, had fibers from the rare type of upholstery in his Bronco, that matched those found on the glove found behind his house. 8. OJ, by coincidence, suffered deep cuts to his middle finger on his left hand the same night as the murders occurred, where the evidence is consistent with the killer bleeding from his left hand. 9. OJ, by coincidence, was seen to be wearing a dark blue sweatsuit, seen by Kato Kaelin, shortly before the murders occurred and dark blue cotton fibers were found at the murder scene. The sweatsuit could not be accounted for. 10. Somebody/something other than OJ made a noise behind Kato's room at the same time Alan Park was ringing the intercom and right before a person matching the description of OJ was seen entering the house by Alan Park. What is more likely, #1-10 are all true or OJ killed two people?

@hombresgotnoname

6 жыл бұрын

The strongest argument is always the simplest, and easiest to understand. Your EDTA argument, intentional or not, comes off as quibbling. Most people won't understand it. OTOH they will understand that EDTA isn't found in human blood, and that if it is found at the crime scene, there's a good chance the blood was planted there.

@sgberta

6 жыл бұрын

I agree. Science is complicated. It's easier for people to believe a conspiracy theory than it is to follow and correctly interpret the actual evidence. Not to mention when the people peddling the conspiracy theory are extremely persuasive. The more I learn about the case, the more clear to me it is that OJ was guilty; however it also has become more clear to me why he was acquitted and it's precisely for the kind of reason you identified. Thanks for the comment.

@hombresgotnoname

6 жыл бұрын

Science is complicated, but it can be simple too. For example, has EDTA ever been found naturally in human blood before? And has it ever honestly been present in blood found at the crime scene? If so, then I think that would be a very strong argument for the "OJ did it" crowd.

@sgberta

6 жыл бұрын

The answer to your question is yes and no. EDTA is not natural, so it does not occur naturally but it is present in trace amounts in blood because it is found in laundry detergent and other products and enters the body from these unnatural sources. If you recall, during the trial there was a lot of debate as to what the expected concentration of EDTA should be in human blood. They came to no consensus during the trail (the only literature on the subject was from the 1950s) and there remains no consensus to this day, to the best of my knowledge. That being said, detecting EDTA in and of itself is not super significant and only part of the equation. The concentration is the other big thing. As I stated previously, there was a 1000x difference in concentration between the blood tested and the blood of the reference sample. FBI agent Martz testified that he tested his own blood for EDTA and also got a positive result in a very low concentration. Another argument made was that the test was likely giving a false positive for EDTA at these very low concentrations. Below is the link to an article that describes the testimony better than I can: www.nytimes.com/1995/07/26/us/fbi-disputes-simpson-defense-on-tainted-blood.html

@garrickgregory6403

6 жыл бұрын

Martz did more harm than good because he testified for the defense that EDTA was present shared his testimony at the court recess with the prosecution and flipped on the defense stating EDTA wasn't present. But we also find out he erased the raw data from the computer. Rieders had much more experience than him reading the results as EDTA because when Marcia Clark told him the values Rieders said " He would bleed to death with 2000 parts per million." Martz own lab whistle blew on him that he committed perjury on the stand. Martz wasn't credible

These are the two you go see when you’ve got a problem

If that case wasn't televised, it probably would have taken half as long and probably would have come back a hung jury or guilty. Television made it a joke.

To quote my former boss who worked in forensics for 40 years, "The LAPD framed a guilty man." There isn't a person on this earth with a properly functioning brain that thinks OJ Simpson is innocent and that would include his legal team. Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld have done so much amazing work with wrongful convictions, but it makes me sick that they were largely responsible for getting a vicious murder off.

Wow, just wow... seeing this after the George Floyd verdict... just Wow. Thank you Mr. Neufeld and Mr. Scheck

a single incident of domestic violence...who's he kidding

@Jim.Jim.32

4 жыл бұрын

this is true, and actually backed up by Nicole herself in a the 1993 911 call. By the way the 911 call was a verbal argument. Nicole was seen doing coke with Heidi Fliess in the home and also having oral sex with a known drug dealer in the home with OJs kids awake upstairs. Suffice it to say, he was upset.

@Meng776

4 жыл бұрын

If you listen to the video closely, you'll clearly hear ok complaining about her sleeping with this dude while his kids are there.

@rayali9854

Жыл бұрын

Your speaking from experience.i believe you.

Charlie Rose is playing Johnny Carson to Scheck and Neufeld's Jim Garrison. Amazing how similar this is to the 1968 Tonight Show episode with New Orleans DA Jim Garrison pursuing the assassins of President Kennedy

@johnscanlon2598

2 ай бұрын

This is Charlie Rose’s style this is why he was popular he didn’t bullshit anybody he calls them out , he’s asking questions that were on peoples minds like he said

@Jim_Harwood

2 ай бұрын

@@johnscanlon2598 Scheck and Nuefeld do a great job showing Charlie why Simpson was innocent, while Charlie shows his viewers what a brainwashed boob looks and acts like. Know anyone like Charlie?

The only reason that OJ looks guilty is because of the slow speed Bronco chase. Throw that out and OJ looks a lot more innocent

@milart12

2 жыл бұрын

The only reason? C'mon now.

@infonomics

Жыл бұрын

What about the suicide letter and the equivocating about the cut finger!

@randyhanson4973

Жыл бұрын

@@infonomics Ya that doesn’t look too good

yes! to this interview though. hyper-crushes on both these freedom fighters

For Furhman to have planted the glove, 10 or so uniformed officers who were onsite before Furhman was called would have had to be a part of the frame up in addition to Vannader. Was there evidence or speculation of Vannader planting evidence before? He had no public complaints filed against him in 20+ years on the force. Why would he risk prison or worse a few years before retirement? Wasn’t there at least 2 occasions of OJ beating Nicole? The time she time she called the police, and an officer met her at the gate and heard her say he’s going to kill me. Then the time when her sister took the photos. Then there was the dispatcher tape of his raging when she called again as he was trying to break in to her home.

Charlie rose discusses me

Barry scheck cross examination of fung for seven days was mind blowing

@dennisbeacham5747

Ай бұрын

Fung is probably having nightmares of that cross examination

Barry was the one who dismantled the prosecution case, although Fung and some other tech were so bad that it was much easier for Barry. He should have been given much more credit for the outcome of the trial.

So…they planted evidence BEFORE they knew if OJ had an alibi or not? Lol. That would just be stupid.

@dpabercrombie

Жыл бұрын

Not to mention 4 cops were at the scene before Mark Fuhrman and only saw one glove.

I love their white saviour complex. lol.

Oj may bee many things but murderer he's not...

Furhman was charged with perjury and did 3 years probation.

@milart12

Жыл бұрын

And??? Therefore, OJ is innocent?

These are pretty terrible human beings. I wonder if they actually believed that oj was innocent.

Epic interview...CR not totally professional here. He was glib.

It's not about seeing that the verdict is correct,...it's about winning. Both sides want to win. The verdict is not always the correct one. Plenty of innocent people get convicted, some of the guilty get off. Sadly, it's as simple as that. Asking 12 people who have little understanding of what is being presented to them, to decide guilt or innocence is so wrong, hence, people get off...

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

yes blame the jury

Scum lawyers will do anything to get their clients off, regardless of the truth. They give good lawyers a bad name.

Clearly you know Charlie sides with the prosecution lol

Agree or disagree with Scheck and Neufeld, these are 2 brilliant minds. Why did I get the dumb end of the stick?! lol. RIP Juice. Whether you believe he was the killer or not (I think he was), he was someone’s father, grandfather, brother, friend

They paid big bucks to help OJ I wonder how the feel today

@mkedmusa9416

6 жыл бұрын

Johnny Jack Victorius!

Bringing doubt in court doesn't make a person smart.but very evil

28:18 Charlie was emotionally invested and was a victim of filtered news from pundits and commentators 😂 He is so wound up because he was exposed as being superficial.

Of all the many defence attourneys, these are the most credible. Their problem is they only address evidence allowed into the trial for the jury. But thats all required of lawyers in their position. They cast many aspersions on various evidence, but nothing convincing. Ironically Scheck was cited by polled jurors as the most effective defence attourney. I think the magnificent Innocence Project movements they initiated are bigger than this one case. If the cost of that significant justice was a rich black man going free - well who cares? Guilty white men and women buy their freedoms everyday, despite the iniquitous nature of the capitalistic justice system. If the price of all the IP exonerations is OJ making law enforcement look dumb - that's a good deal, bring it all on. The nationwide network of law schools and innocence projects has grown enormously, and they all do such good work. If losing the OJ trial was the price, consider it paid back. If OJ was white no one would have been paying attention, and the national movement for justice would not exist. America's biggest problem with OJ was that a black potential murderer got set free, what's annoying is what a shitty black man he was. The OJ aquittal pales in comparison with recent bizarre Grand Jury decisions to NOT charge guilty white cops. Since Zimmerman was aquitted, America appears to have had the popular judicial stuff passed over to a Klan-esque conspiracy. Since then every angry white male with dumb legally-owned guns had got pseudo-license to fire at and/or kill people of colour. What shocks me most is hoŵ few folks are challenging this lunacy! Is this the legacy our children deserve???

@lisellesloan3191

8 жыл бұрын

I care that anyone, let alone Project Innocent lawyers, would knowingly defend a man guilty of slaughtering two innocent people. It's abhorrent. They get plenty of funding elsewhere. They probably didn't even get what O.J. owed them. No, most white people are appalled that a murderer got away, whatever color, when their was a mountain of evidence against him. Smart, fair Oprah Winfrey could tell it from the start. People paid attention cause it O.J. was a big celebrity, and they were equally appalled that Robert Blake got aquitted and appalled that Phil Spector murdered that poor actress. Most white people are concerned, as well, that there is racial profiling, and quotas on arrests and poorly trained police that are allowed to chase after suspects who have minor infractions, such as expired license plates, selling lose cigarettes, etc. Witness the many whites who are in BLM; heck, a white man even started it.

@binzsta86

7 жыл бұрын

It doesn't matter if they know or not. The fact is, L.A police have a history of police corruption against blacks. I don't know if Mark Fuhrman planted evidence or not but what I do know is, he's a racist. That alone should make the case that he INVESTIGATED! irrelevant against O.J.

@Meng776

4 жыл бұрын

Guys, some of that evidence was planted...that's just the truth. Some of the evidence and proof of OJs guilt is sound. But the planted evidence provided reasonable doubt. You can't expect the jury to sift through the evidence to determine what's forensics is good and what's planted. OJ got off because is the LAPD. Don't blame OJs lawyers because the LAPD planted evidence.

16:00 - 16:15

10:10 - 10:25

Try reading Hank Goldberg's book

People want him to be guilty so bad.. the truth hurts. The jury made the right decision💯

@garethwilby4033

3 ай бұрын

What do you mean “they want him to be guilty” he is guilty! He cannot possibly be innocent with his blood at the murder scene!

@robskeys88

3 ай бұрын

@garethwilby4033 You can't trust ANY of that blood evidence! It was proven that blood was tampered with, planted and found weeks later by corrupt police officers like Mark Furman smh. Blood was also found with EDTA! like I said the Jury made the right decision they saw right though the prosecution's BS case

@robskeys88

3 ай бұрын

You can't trust ANY of that blood evidence! It was proven that corrupt police officers like Mark Furman tampered with and planted evidence. Evidence was found weeks later with EDTA, 1.5cc of Oj's missing blood, etc.. don't be naive

@milart12

3 ай бұрын

1-The presence of the glove(s) at the scene is, in itself, very damning. Of all the millions of gloves in the world, the killer just happened to own the same type of limited edition gloves that OJ owned. What are the chances of that? The police could have questioned ALL of the people who owned these gloves and I am sure that none of them even knew who Nicole was . I believe that the testimony was that there were 200 of these gloves sold 2. The presence of the African American hairs on the skull cap further reduces the pool of suspects. So of that very small group of people who owned these gloves, all of the white/Asian owners would be eliminated as suspects. The black population in the US is 15%, leaving 30-35 possible suspects. 3.Of those remaining suspects, only those with a reason to kill Nicole AND with a fresh cut on their left hand would remain as suspects. OJ would be the only one in that group.

@robskeys88

3 ай бұрын

Sorry my friend, All of that is strictly your opinion.. there was no proof in any of that

A grandstander, those dummies wouldn't have voted guilty with a videotape

Lawyers represent clients free for the marketing. It’s FREE MARKETING. Better than paying for billboards or bus ads. That’s why they do it. FREE PUBLICITY that will bring them hundreds of clients in the future. Name recognition. They made millions from other clients after this. And charged them.

24:45 Barry couldn't handle it when Charlie asked a legit question about Fuhrman and Vannader working together framing OJ.

21:30 No other evidence. These guys have a lot of nerve. 1-The presence of the glove(s) at the scene is, in itself, very damning. Of all the millions of gloves in the world, the killer just happened to own the same type of limited edition gloves that OJ owned. What are the chances of that? The police could have questioned ALL of the people who owned these gloves and I am sure that none of them even knew who Nicole was . I believe that the testimony was that there were 200 of these gloves sold 2. The presence of the African American hairs on the skull cap further reduces the pool of suspects. So of that very small group of people who owned these gloves, all of the white/Asian owners would be eliminated as suspects. The black population in the US is 15%, leaving 30-35 possible suspects. 3.Of those remaining suspects, only those with a reason to kill Nicole AND with a fresh cut on their left hand would remain as suspects. OJ would be the only one in that group.

@Jim.Jim.32

2 жыл бұрын

Untrue 1. It was an Aris Istotoner - a common glove. 2. The hairs could not be DNA tested. The cap appeared to have been outside for a long period of time. 3. Oj cut his hand in his hotel room in Chicago. This was backed up by a half dozen witnesses and it cannot be rebutted. Nicole was seen by her neighbor arguing with 3 men in front of her condo abut an hour before the murders. Its my belief they had something to do with it.

@milart12

2 жыл бұрын

@@Jim.Jim.32 ! Incorrect. There was significant testimony from Aris employees who testified that there were only 200 pairs of these gloves. 2. It was not DNA tested but it was undisputed that the hat contained hairs from a black man. I have no idea why you say the cap appeared to be outside for a long period of time. It was found right next to Ronald Goldman. 3. Incorrect again. OJ was questioned by Lange and Vanatter the day after the murder. They had discovered blood at OJ's house WHILE HE WAS IN CHICAGO. OJ admitted that he cut his hand at his house while he was running around before his trip to Chicago i.e. at the exact time of the murders. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pGRlxcyxfMaforA.html

@luskapani9905

2 жыл бұрын

OJ confessed already many times. Of course he did it.

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

1. has anyone you know ever borrowed a t-shirt, coat, gloves, scarf? The concept that only the things own ed by one person are used by one person is not based on reality in most social groups. 2. African American hair that did not match with OJ so just who was wearing that hat and why did they decide to leave it at the crime scene? Seems a bit silly no, to be leaving caps and gloves of blood laying round, why not put them in your pocket when fleeing? IF you do not see that as suspect then what can we do. 3. Airline pilot and autograph hunters at airport and on plane said he had not cut on his knuckle, was not bleeding and had no bruises on his face. Ron Goldman's knuckles were swollen and blue and his arms had lots of defensive wounds. Being a black belt karate and 21 years his junior in his phyisical prime in a knife fight to the death why is Simpson unmarked? Seems to me like you are rushing to judgement just like the LAPD did when it is clearly more nuanced that it seems.

@milart12

Жыл бұрын

@@TheInterestedObserver This is the type of hair splitting you get from OJ truthers. 1. No, it is not my experience that adult males share expensive gloves with each other. I have never done so and I have never had anyone let me wear their very expensive gloves. 2.The hair in the knit cap was not genetically matched to OJ, but it contained African American hairs, demonstrating that the person who killed Ron and Nicole was black. 3. The fact that there were airline passengers who did not detect a cut on OJ's hand is certainly not dispositive evidence that he did not have a cut on his hand. The police had already found blood at Rockingham WHILE OJ WAS IN CHICAGO. When confronted with the evidence, OJ admitted that he cut his hand the previous evening AT OR AROUND THE SAME TIME THAT RON AND NICOLE WERE KILLED. When asked how he cut his hand, he replied that he did not know. Did you listen to the interrogation? 4. Of course at the civil trial we found out that OJ did, in fact, own the very rare Bruno Magli shoes that the murderer wore, only 200 some were sold in the US(I suppose that you are going to tell me that OJ let a friend of his wear the shoes too) So you are saying that there is another black male who owns both these very rare Isotoner gloves AND these very Bruno Magli shoes who had a cut on his left hand and even knew , let alone had a reason to kill, Nicole.? This is of course just a small fraction of the evidence which directly points to OJ as the killer.

Leaving aside whether OJ is guilty or not (let's be real, he is) I'll never understand why criminal defense attorneys get blamed and told "you're going to hell" or "how can you sleep at night?" as if they committed the crimes. They did what they were paid to do, it's your client and you're supposed to defend even the guiltiest of people. That's their job and how they make the system work, whether you like it or not... it's a vital part of the American judicial system (defending the indefensible) & I just don't get the comments telling them they're going to hell as if they did it themselves, and yes when it comes to high profile cases and they have to give interviews they still have to be on the side of their clients, even if they're client was a murderer. I mean after all; defense lawyers risk their reputations and perhaps their careers when they go all-out for obviously guilty clients

@quincy-ix5qm

8 жыл бұрын

O.J. didn't do it. At 4:00 pm June 13 1994 a video was taken with in O.J.'s bedroom and there were no socks there. about an hour later the bloody socks were in his bedroom. Not to mention all the blood evidence at Bundy had no EDTA in it until 3-4 months after the murders. This mean the evidence was contaminated and planted. The blood in the Bronco that was under the center console was in a place where O.J.s left hand couldn't have been which means it was planted. The blood at Simpson's home was LOCATED side by side which means a person would have to be bleeding from to sides of there body and everyone knows O.J. was bleeding from his left finger. Not to mention Ron & Nicole were fighting like hell for their life's if O.J> really did it he would have way more bruises and cuts then just a small cut on his finger.

@garethwilby4033

6 жыл бұрын

quincy 7143 the time clock on the video was an hour behibd

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

@@garethwilby4033 witnesses claim the socks were there, then moved before the video was taken, then put back there afterwards, yet more reasons why that evidence should be thrown out.

Him and Cochran should of got clay award He deserved it.

Theae 2 must pay for their moral errors too. Like the LAPD. And Charlie shut up.

19:15. Listening him belittle Charlie shows you what kind of person he is.

Once police are incompetent and dirty, I'd never agree with them. Likely more then one person did it....

What's interesting about this video of these 3 guys is. You have two Jewish lawyers making the point about Fuhrman being a racist who already had a reputation before the Simpson case. Including, Fuhrman being known for his antisemitic actions. But. Charlie Rose, like some of the other Jewish people, were so racially obsessed with Simpson. They were willing to give Fuhrman an antisemitic pass. In order to justify their racism towards a Black man, whom they felt, killed a wyt woman. And sadly. These types. They'll ignore the gray areas, in order make this a black and white argument, over their covert racist Black and White racism. Charlie's racism card wss showing. And the two lawyers perp it and exposed it. Had this been a Jewish man on trial. Rosr would've been willing to listen. One another related note. For all that we know. The murders could've been a racial hate crime. Especially if those racist saw a Jewish man at Nicole's condo. Ron Goldman was Jewish too. And. Nicole stated thst she was receiving a lot if racist letters and thrests, where she'd became so concerned. She'd asked Simpson to come by and monitor the condo. This was shortly before the murders.

All the defense as to do is create a reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury. This is such a low bar and easily obtainable.

@TheInterestedObserver

Жыл бұрын

not if you have incontrovertible proof of guilt which should be the bat for taking away yours or anyone's freedom. I am pretty sure you would want undoubted proof if you were wrongly accused of something.

@christopherdell9601

Жыл бұрын

Tell that to the 400 men that have been EXONERATED, not just acquitted with the likes of the Innocence Project. They were railroaded because the system is based on blind loyalty to prosecution and police, by Judges AND Juries! But DNA proved their innocence.

@chrisdell5679

3 ай бұрын

​@TheInterestedObserver especially considering the resources the state exhausted

@aaronlawlor9475

2 ай бұрын

​@@TheInterestedObserverthe point is..these 2 lawyers think it's enough just to create doubt...there Was significant undeniable evidence to convict...they just think he should be let off inspire of it because they created doubts which is Wrong!!..

oh they are blaming fuhrman bs

@Meng776

4 жыл бұрын

Why would you act like the Fuhrman angle didn't matter when Fuhrman himself bragged about planting evidence because he hated black people? The difference is black people believed Fuhrman was what he said he was, somehow white people think Fuhrman lied when he bragged about planting evidence.

@pommiebears

3 ай бұрын

@@Meng776 wasn’t he being recorded for a screen play though? Acting out characters?

@Meng776

3 ай бұрын

@@pommiebears It was a documentary about women in policing. Fuhrman was chosen to interview because he was known to hate women police...he was actually part of a group that openly opposed women police. This was more of a documentary than anything else. All the racist things he said were part of his explanation on why women shouldn't be in policing. You may remember that Ito was nearly removed as judge because his wife was a police and Fuhrman's boss and Fuhrman had made crazy, sexist comments about her.

Barry Scheck got the cheddar

the glove belonged to Ron Goldman , the ring fingere was torned off and the blood in this glove matched Ron Goldman's blood one in 42 million it could not have been someone elses. this was told at the very beginning before the preliminary trial and they kept this information sealed.

@pommiebears

3 ай бұрын

Go back to sleep, eh?

@christopherblack3102

3 ай бұрын

Those gloves were of a limited produced type that were identified by a prosecution witness. There was also a receipt when Nicole purchased them for OJ. The reason Ron’s blood is all over the gloves is because Ron was stabbed 27 times by the person ( OJ ) wearing the gloves when he was killing Ron.

But how did they get OJ's blood that night and plant it on the glove, socks, and crime scene ?

@stevenpringle9225

2 жыл бұрын

How do you know the blood was planted that night. Fact, blood was extracted from the fence 3 weeks later.

@adamchewy2284

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevenpringle9225 I believe it was 2 weeks later, it was on the bottom gate post, blood contained EDTA. The fact is that everyone fumbled the ball in this (no pun) prosecution, judge, jury, police, and sloppy OJ. Police protocol was ridiculous though.

@stevenpringle9225

2 жыл бұрын

@@adamchewy2284 I'll bet this type of sloppy evidence gathering goes unchecked more than any of us can imagine. My point is a person's guilt or non guilt can easily be called into question with good defense attorneys. Did the prosecution prove its case. With a man's life on the line? I'm going need it proven without a shadow of doubt.

@adamchewy2284

2 жыл бұрын

@@stevenpringle9225 No. They didn't prove it. On top of that, everybody looks at Fuhrman and the racist LAPD like it didn't effect the outcome of that jury (4 hours) , and that is total BS. The second he took the 5th for not planting evidence at OJ's, it would have been over for me. Plus, that jury wanted out of there fast. And have you listened to the full tapes ? If they were able to hear those tapes, it would have been over. Race played a major card, not really knowing about DNA played a card, basically a tornado of things played a card. But , I believe OJ did it, and I think he would gain a lot of respect if he just sat down and admitted it, but that will never happen, bc of his kids. Speaking of Fuhrman, how is one of the biggest faces of police brutality, ugliness, disgusting, and pure image of just a bad racist cop become a Fox News Crime Analyst ???? Ok.. he paid his debt I guess, but that is it... why is he there on tv talking about police tactics and police operations in the summer of 2020 with his resume. One more thing: I don't believe that after a heavy night of drinking with family and friends, that OJ's actions of grabbing Nicole's crotch and saying " This is where baby's come from, and it's mine. " is bad. She laughed... I've seen that happen at least 4 times in my life, and though some women might find that disturbing, I just don't see anything wrong with it. They were wasted, and she laughed her ass off.

@stevenpringle9225

2 жыл бұрын

@@adamchewy2284 a wicked people, in charge of a wicked system, gets you wicked results. I find it funny how WFs profess a belief in TMH and know nothing about him. They're quick holler socialism. Yet it's ordained in the scriptures. Capitolist are call a den of thieves.

Scheck is a badass

@dixiedeed4918

3 жыл бұрын

The best

@dpabercrombie

Жыл бұрын

Yeah so cool how he got a man who brutally murdered people off