The actress playing Camila is so wonderful that she makes Charles look like a lost child doing what Dickie told him to do, “sow his wild oats!”

@gerardacronin334

Ай бұрын

That’s Emerald Fennell. She comes from an aristocratic family and is also a movie director. She directed “Saltburn”.

@lynndenault4212

Ай бұрын

Emerald Fennell

Charles was pressured into marrying, his bed hopping was making him a liability.

The casting was so kind to the characters of Charles and Camilla that I accidentally rooted for their relationship.

“Until she dies, I cannot truly be alive” … Jesus (and by the look on her face, she was equally as shocked for a second)

@user-hx8mg4us1i

Ай бұрын

"fully" I'm guessing😅😅 not that important, not attacking at all..

@AndyBluebear-fi9om

Ай бұрын

I mean, that is the unspoken truth for anyone in a hereditary position...you get nothing until the current title holder passes away, whether it's royalty or the aristocracy. Unless they abdicate, which you do see in other European royal families, but not in this one, usually.

@gnas3390

24 күн бұрын

This is fiction, not the truth.

@stevebbuk9557

4 күн бұрын

@@gnas3390 Didn't Charles say a similar thing to Charles Spencer when John Spencer died?

@here_we_go_again2571

8 сағат бұрын

@@stevebbuk9557 Both Charles and Charles Edward Spencer felt the same way about their parent who held the title. Unfortunately, Charles E. Spencer has followed in his father's (and grandfather's) footsteps regarding his treatment of his 3 wives (He is now being divorced from wife #3)

He's probably never had that much fun ever before. And for a long time after this date.

You can say whatever you want. But every woman would like to be loved as Camila is loved by him 😅

@anastasia10017

Ай бұрын

I agree

@mjacobs5041

28 күн бұрын

Yeah - as arguably selfish as they both acted at times, the show was good at showing the core relationship as being genuine and two people who really got each other over the years. Not sure how much is made up as to events and if they really were briefly planning to get married when young, but it’s an interesting and tragic “what-if?”

@heidikindon5182

25 күн бұрын

Not by a man like that. He’s pitiful.

@KathleenMcNe

4 күн бұрын

Not by an effeminate, dimwitted, pampered, narcissistic man-child like Charles.

Charles longed for the very thing he was never prepared to take on.

@tiffanyferguson829

Ай бұрын

He should have tried to make things work with Harry and Meghan.

@startracker5895

Ай бұрын

@@tiffanyferguson829he was jealous of them eclipsing him exactly like he was jealous of Diana. Very insecure and needy man. Not great traits for a king! 😒

@coolmt4961

27 күн бұрын

@@tiffanyferguson829harry married trash

@here_we_go_again2571

10 күн бұрын

Charles did not want, nor was he encouraged to take on the responsibility of marriage and children at a younger age. He was very happy to be a playboy prince and to have multiple affairs, many with other men's wives. It appears that he was taking advice from both uncle Dickie and the Duke of Windsor.

@here_we_go_again2571

10 күн бұрын

@@tiffanyferguson829 Charles wasn't the problem with Harry and Meghan. Harry's jealousy of his brother and Meghan's refusal to bend to royal rules and to respect HMTQ was the problem. [Meghan had the mistaken notion that her behavior would change a 1,000 year institution] Neither William or Harry were thrilled when their father married Camilla. But William realized that if Camilla made Charles happy it was better for his father to not be alone. In all fairness, Camilla has been very nice to Catherine and she has tried to be a good grandmother to George, Charlotte and Louis. For his part, Charles has tried to get on with Camilla's children and welcomed her grandchildren too. William and Catherine do not hang out with Camilla's children/grandchildren but they are on friendly terms which makes the holidays and vacations pleasant.

I still find these two revolting. By the way they behaved. I know they must be very happy together now. But it was at someone else's expense.

@Johngeorgesmith

Ай бұрын

How about the two people whose actions were at someone else’s expense being the parents of Diana who divorced when she was eight. Didn’t that divorce of her parents shape her destiny more than the divorce from her husband?

@normadesmond6017

Ай бұрын

@@Johngeorgesmith what does the divorce of her parents have to do with the fact that her husband cheated on her? There are many, many, mny people who come from a family were parents weren't together and why still were and are very happily married.

@Johngeorgesmith

Ай бұрын

@@normadesmond6017 Diana’s parents divorced when she was very young and vulnerable. I believe she was also a very sensitive child and their divorce which was not pleasant btw scarred her psyche for her life. It left an empty hole in her and a tremendous and unfortunate neediness for love and attention which really no one person could fill completely nor the attention and admiration of the world. You see, when parents divorce and their child is young and perhaps more sensitive than the average child, those parents are taking the chance of making their child a broken empty person for life because the divorce destroys the child’s sense of stability. Many intelligent and compassionate parents know so they will postpone an inevitable divorce until their children are at least 18 and off to college or work and have developed a more stable psyche. Diana’s parents set the course for her turbulent and troubled life. Charles for sure had his own childhood issues and that made them both a horrible match. Two people with deep insecurities looking to the other insecure partner to support them. Unfortunately the wounds of Diana’s parents divorce at young age made her the more broken of the two. Camilla, who came from a more stable, non-divorced family, and who is a stronger person mentally and psychologically was the right match to prop up insecure Charles. He needed Camilla to get through the pressure cooker life he was born into. Diana and Charles were two drowning souls of little or no use to one another. Charles, the stronger of the two, found his life raft in Camilla and ultimately he had a strong instinct to survive. Unfortunately Diana never found that life raft she was always looking for since her parents set her up for a troubled life when they divorced when she was too young to handle it. Does that make sense?

@Johngeorgesmith

Ай бұрын

@@normadesmond6017 Also, is it not true that all children of divorce become broken people in some way and to some degree? No child wants to be a child of divorce.

@Ashbrash1998

Ай бұрын

​@@JohngeorgesmithThat is wholly separate from the subject they are talking about. It doesn't negate what Charles and Camilla did at all and it is ironic how you focus on Diana and her parents being divorced but not about her sons being impacted by the divorce.

"Why was Queen Victoria like the weather in Britain? Because she reigned and reigned and reigned and reigned and never let the sun come out." A joke our great grandparents told.

Charles seems to be perfectly miserable.

@here_we_go_again2571

10 күн бұрын

He was. So was Diana

Charles is a child. Diana dared to outshine him. Charles was jealous of her. It was easy for him to love Camilla because with her, he could be the star. So loving Camilla was a huge insult to her.

God forever moaning 🙄🙄😂😂😂

@anastasia10017

Ай бұрын

no it was a set up for the trick card

Lives a very priviliged life, still unhappy

@teddykgb3865

2 ай бұрын

A beautiful prison is still a prison.

@bananamanchester4156

Ай бұрын

That's Depression for you, bud. Can't buy your way out of it.

@here_we_go_again2571

10 күн бұрын

@@teddykgb3865 Too bad HMTQ didn't arrange for Andrew Parker-Bowles (career military) and his Mrs. to be transferred abroad for a couple of years. There is no way that they could have kept that house in Gloucester if he was not stationed in UK. (Gloucester is in western England, not too far from Wales. Camilla's family is from "Camilla was raised in East Sussex and South Kensington in England, UK" Andrew Parker-Bowles was born in Surrey and was raised in Berkshire. Both in SE England.

Pure Viktor Frankle.

I literally have no idea what was so amusing about the conversation or the confetti in the face was-even after watching this scene 5 times trying to figure it out. Not my sense of humor I guess. I guess speaking frankly is considered shocking by some people’s standards 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🤷🏻‍♂️ and that confetti is funny.

@AndyBluebear-fi9om

Ай бұрын

I think it was a way of showing us how Camilla "gets" Charles in ways Diana never could.

@andrewsward3841

Ай бұрын

@@AndyBluebear-fi9om I can see that. Yes. Personally, I don’t like Charles and I truly LOATHE Camilla. She’s frumpy and plain and just not Diana-but to each his own. He wanted Miss Camilla and he got her. But calling Camilla a queen just makes me ill quite frankly. To me there’s nothing graceful or royal about her.

He was always a jerk

Hey, good morning!

I say God bless him. God bless them both.

@MegaJohny56

3 ай бұрын

God bless him, sad that his position makes him easy prey to female schemers like that adultress

@AgentClaytonWebb

Ай бұрын

@@MegaJohny56takes two to tango…

@MegaJohny56

Ай бұрын

@@AgentClaytonWebb this is true

@lucindaarmour4685

Ай бұрын

@@MegaJohny56 She is the love of his life, regardless.

@Johngeorgesmith

Ай бұрын

@@MegaJohny56How was she the schemer if he kept repeatedly reaching out to her? She was the only woman who could make him happy so he kept seeking her out and she gave in, perhaps out of pity for him, not wanting him to be totally miserable without her which in all likelihood he would be if she rejected him.

Charles is emotionally immature. His mother was never there for him. I'm glad he found happiness with Camilla at last. Charles is a good man. He was pressured into marrying Diana when all the while he loved Camilla and was always faithful to her. Till the end, when his dreams came true. I'm sure he will make a very good king.

@lindsay1989

25 күн бұрын

A good man? He betrayed his wife and children time and time again. He was jealous and small. A worm of a man.

Wish they’d used “A Girl Like You” by Edwyn Collins in this scene instead of Beggin’ You!!

Fuckin weird vibes

Can’t be Free and Imprisoned at the same time. Judging by how much he complains I’d say he’s imprisoned 😆

@startracker5895

Ай бұрын

That’s why he didn’t want Harry and Meghan to leave because he was jealous he couldn’t do the same.

He did have a choice. He knew the rules and the ramifications. He chose to be a deadbeat loser and marry Diana and carry on with Camilla. Both were despicable when your actions and side games are at the expense of another person. He asked for her hand in marriage. Had he no intentions of leaving the Camilla bs behind, he should have never married. Can't have your muffin and eat it too.

Dickie Mountbatten's advice ("Let Charles sow his wild oats") has, obviously, backfired! Forcing Diana to maintain a full working royal schedule while her children were young also backfired. *If Charles had married a young woman, when he was young:* 1.) He would not have been such an old fogey. By the time he got married all of his social group had been married for years and had their families. 2.) The baby making would have been over by the time he was in his early 30's (the age he married Diana) or perhaps by age 36- 39. Royals are not poor. Royals can afford nannies as well as have children that are fairly close together since the wife does not have to work outside of the home (for the basics of life) 3.) Ten years before he married Diana, HMTQ and Prince Philip were also 10 years younger. A younger Charles, married to a younger woman could have taken more time off his royal duties to be with his wife and children. And/or stayed close to home and let his parents take the foreign trips. 4.) There was no reason to force Diana to have a full schedule when the boys were young. By the time both of them were in boarding school that would have been the time for her to jump into many royal appearances.

@lizetteolsen3218

12 сағат бұрын

I think the real point is Charles should never have been forced into marrying Diana in the 1st place based on such ridiculous requirements. He was never allowed to marry as he wanted b/c of his role. Remember there was a huge age gap between the 2 of them as well. His family wanted it. Her family wanted it. She never really understood it was not a love match.

@here_we_go_again2571

8 сағат бұрын

@@lizetteolsen3218 EXACTLY! >"She [Diana] never really understood it was not a love match" *That (above) is the root of the problem!* 1.) *She was young and naive.* She was young, had a lot of silly notions about romance (her step- grandmother's novels were her her first choice of reading material) 2.) *Lack of parental guidance* She came from a very dysfunctional home. All of the siblings detested their step-mother. The two older girls were already at boarding school; that left Diana and Charles Edward at home to deal with her. Both were packed off to boarding school at a very young age -- asap to get them out of the house (look what happened to her brother!) 3.) Charles and Diana barely knew each other (12 dates?) when they got married.

He’s a top 5 most disliked characters for me and all the others were rapist murdering psychos but he still makes the list

@lucindaarmour4685

Ай бұрын

That says way more about you than him. Sorry but how can you include that man on the same list as murdering psychos? Over 40% of married couples divorce - are they also all to be condemned?

@bulbasaurtheboss4420

Ай бұрын

​​@@lucindaarmour4685 In my opinion, if we had laws to punish cheaters, they would be less of them. How is it complicated to broke up with someone if you want to sleep with someone else? Cheating shouldn't be so frequent.

@lucindaarmour7422

Ай бұрын

​@@bulbasaurtheboss4420 There are countries that have laws for cheaters. The same countries that strip women of their rights. Women accused of adultery (that would include Diana) are incarcerated and executed. Be very careful what you wish for. In liberated nations we understand that human will is free. As it should be. People should stay in a relationship through choice, not law.

@bulbasaurtheboss4420

Ай бұрын

​@@lucindaarmour7422 I didn't say people should be executed, and as justice is supposed to be, you should have to give some proofs in that case. And it shouldn't apply only for women obviously. Law punish those who commited murders but they're not executed in my country, death penalty is not possible anymore here for years, so it didn't cross my mind. So you don't have to dramatize everything, we can obviously have laws without that bad things resulting.

@lucindaarmour7422

Ай бұрын

@@bulbasaurtheboss4420 Totally agree but its a very slippery slope. What restrictions would you like on peoples private lives and autonomy? What exactly would they be fined for? What acts, what intentions, what relationships? We are all impacted by infedelity but creating law around free will between consenting adults is a deeply dangerous road to treat. And is no deterent. You will remember the decades whites and blacks were not allowed to be in relationships in South Africa during the appartied era. It didnt work. Love is love. Attraction is attraction. Prison time did not deter them.

Ironic how when he finally was made King few time passed until having cancer and having to rest and not reign, I cant help but think that Karma is very real.

Everybody can hate Camilla but it is not Camilla's fault they fell in love Charles never hided his feelings for her you know what you want to know someone to blame blame the one who ruled the crown it's true between them 2 that laugh..the way she ran up the stairs he really loved her

oh poor baby.....whiner...🙄

He doesn’t deserve to be king. I can’t wait to see William become King. He is definitely fit for the role.

@deathoftheendless

21 күн бұрын

William is a scumbag too. Cheating on Cathrine.

She spread her legs for a married man and he went in. Now we're supposed to be impressed with the love they have for each other?

@chriswaits6402

Ай бұрын

🤢

@AndyBluebear-fi9om

Ай бұрын

Wasn't he single when they first hooked up?

HRH had a sophomoric sense of humor and probably still does. Charles loves Camilla because With her he can be himself, not just the prince of Wales. Diana and Charles’s marriage was doomed because Diana was searching for a daddy figure to fawn over her but Charles needed a nurturing mummy substitute. He found her in Camilla who is his safe harbor. She knows how to manage his moods and jolly him out of himself. One wonders if she still has to call him Sir in private. If she does, it’s sardonic.

Camilla has always got what she wants.Poor Diana 😢

Some cheap acting

Charles just sounds like he is whining, annoying.

Charles the cheater and Camilla the home-wrecker King & Queen of Adultery