I adore how the Queen knows whenever plotting is afoot who to look for: Get Mummy and Lord Mountbatten....

Now we know who separated them. Tywin Lannister, of course!

What it did was only flare their relationship up..and it continued for 30+ years before they got married...

The irony is that Camilla wasn't a problem, until royal busybodies made her a problem. Now I don't know how much truth there is to this scene, but just imagine if Charles had been allowed to marry her in the first place? That wedding really would have been the fairytale wedding. And Diana could have stayed an unknown lesser noble with an unknown husband.

@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

Ай бұрын

@LaKellita1. Very well said but remember everything is timing. I think Camilla didn't inform Charles of her decision to marry Andrew Parker Bowles and Charles was crushed - he may have felt as if the carpet was pulled out from under him. And who would have known Diana or Megan or Kate or Hillary or Priscilla or Jackie or ... if these men didn't pluck them from the huge pile of other waiting women? Although, these women may have contributed to these men's lives they still ride on their husbands coattails. Interesting, because these same women were big supporters of ERA. You make a sensible point here in that the women I mentioned would have just gone on to marry other "unknown lesser noble men." This would have been a very bitter pill to swallow because all the women I mentioned have bigger egos than their husbands! 😂 LoL 🤣.

@allanadutchak5159

15 күн бұрын

We would have a beloved Queen Consort, unmarred by the scandal of the 90s, a confident King, a likely less traumatized prince or princess of Wales. and I have no doubt that Lady Spencer would still be a household name, loved by all, a caring and compassionate philanthropist who works tirelessly for children worldwide.

@LaKellita1

15 күн бұрын

@@JoanMorrison-vq2jc well, Kate and Meghan are not relevant here, because had Charles been allowed to marry Camilla in the first place, William and Harry wouldn't actually exist, or at least not the version we have now. They would probably have had a happy childhood and not had it marred by losing their mother at an early age. They might have had more siblings. They likely wouldn't have a love hate relationship with the media, and probably would have been more confident. They probably would have made better choices for wives. As for Camilla not informing Charles of her decision, she may have been instructed not to. We don't know what she and her family were told.

@MsJubjubbird

4 күн бұрын

She wouldn't have been as popular because she wasn't a young, beautiful Disney princess virgin. But I think they would.have been happier

Great scene but untrue. Charles and Camilla were only casually dating. Camilla's choice for a husband was Andrew Parker Bowles. Charles was fun and nice but that's it. Charles wanted to concentrate on his Navel duties. He thought Camilla would be around not realizing she really wanted Andrew and she didn't want to be Queen. No one broke them up. She married Andrew who cheated on her though their dating and their entire marriage. Camilla later realized that Charles was a better man. Funny how they are all still friends. Andrew was at the Coronation and has been Queen Camilla's personal representative at a funeral. He's often escorting Princess Anne.

@lordalessan

Ай бұрын

It's definitely an overly dramatic depiction but there is truth to it. Lord Mountbatten did discourage Charles from pursuing Camilla but it was because he wanted her to marry his second cousin Amanda Knatchbull and the Queen Mother did prefer him with one of the Spencer sisters.

@Crystal5672cats

Ай бұрын

It’s fictional history. Scenes like this are meant more to encapsulate rumors and feelings and conversations between multiple people in order to move the show forward.

@ems901

Ай бұрын

She’s no queen

Everyone’s acting is superb

The queen, mother: system is too fragile… Me: usually a good sign that the system isn’t working if ever it did.

@davidweihe6052

10 күн бұрын

By the Queen Mother’s logic, she shouldn’t have been allowed to marry a future Duke Of York, either. The screenwriters are inserting themselves into the story.

@antmagor

6 күн бұрын

@@davidweihe6052 doesn’t matter, the system doesn’t work.

I don’t think for a minute that the Queen leapt to Camilla’s defense. It was very important that Charles’s bride be, as they used to say, innocent. Camilla was a bit too shopworn goods. Charles went off to sea and learned that Camilla had married his best mate, Andrew Parker-Bowles, who incidentally had previously messed around with Princess Anne. Complicated, indeed. The irony here is that the aristocratic virgin who was chosen for Charles ended up being the “unstable element”.

@cheekytyke

Ай бұрын

The firm and the Ill treatment she got from Charles and Camilla drove Diana to have emotional issues

"That's not a question" - perfect.

Josh O'Conner is by far in the top 5 best actors in the world. He is amazing in this role playing Charles.

Then he did stand for it

Charles probably walked in their a bit hopeful that she knew what was going on because it would prove she keeps tabs on her kids romantic lives but nope. She knew nothing lol

Now they are painting Camilla white, as snow!!! Oh Diana is the Original wife to Charles if you like it or not.

@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

Ай бұрын

Diana, was the original - yes, but obviously, not Charles's favorite...

@richardbrown6163

Ай бұрын

No sweetie just everyone has moved on

@andiilham6227

Ай бұрын

because she is

@sallylunn8324

Ай бұрын

She’s dead.

@ulefab7503

Ай бұрын

@@richardbrown6163 Most certainly not! This harlot is disliked by a vast majority of people

Honestly, they should have let Charles marry Camilla Parker-Bowles from the beginning.

@lordalessan

Ай бұрын

Even if they did, Andrew was still very much in the picture and there would've three in that marriage.

@firestarteronyoutube5542

Ай бұрын

@@lordalessanAnne was right.... as usual.

@jean-claudepuhetini5978

Ай бұрын

Really agree with you

@donovanmattox432

Ай бұрын

​@lordalessan yea but do you really think that would have been worse than the Diana situation 🤔. Be real, this was Queen Elizabeth's biggest failure. She should have let the relationship take its natural course.

@user-ne3yw2cu6c

24 күн бұрын

Camilla... or should I say Queen Tampax, was a player and would have gotten into other men with Charles joining in the fun... Royal Orgies were happening in the 1960's & 70's but they were all kept hush, hush... Oh My!

He actually didn’t stand for it which is the only reason I have a sliver of respect for Charles. He never really wanted to be with Diana. He stayed loyal to Camilla all those years, waiting for her. The man of every woman’s dreams.

@ems901

Ай бұрын

Ya as he abused the poor girl who didn’t deserve it. A man of any girls dreams….

@Asianbrat

Ай бұрын

@@ems901 yeah but he was being abused and forced into something he didn’t want. He made it very clear to Diana that he loved Camilla.

@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

Ай бұрын

@@Asianbrat Well said!! Charles was emotionally and mentally abused by the devious Diana! Due to her immaturity and wild tantrums she was unfit for the position of princess of Wales and not the least bit compatible with Charles. Diana often spoke about mental health and yet Diana herself never remained with her therapist from what I read. I also read that Diana gave speeches on anti bullying and behind the palace doors Diana was probably the biggest bully in the royal family!

@bubbleofpeace

18 күн бұрын

He is a shameful man. Camillia loved him so much that he married the next creature in pants.

@here_we_go_again2571

17 күн бұрын

@ Asianbrat and @ ems901 Both Charles and Diana abused each other -- OR at the very least, they were unable to "see the forest for the trees" and were at odds with each other, incompatible, etc.. BOTH Diana and Charles cheated on each other! There were MORE THAN 3 PEOPLE in that marriage!

He says he won't stand for it but yet he did, what a wuss

@JoanMorrison-vq2jc

Ай бұрын

Charles DIDN'T stand for this negative treatment of Camilla. He really pounded the queen to get him out of the marriage to "Lady" Diana - Charles pushed for Camilla and obviously they married after so many years of disapproval. It's hurtful knowing that Charles is the head of the Anglican Church though and now he himself is a divorced man. But I also know that no one would admit to Diana being abusive and cruel to Charles. Charles should have dated Diana longer and he would have seen how deeply disturbed Diana was. Where was the outcry back then when Diana was too young to marry? Most people blame Charles. Nobody forced Diana to marry him!! According to family and friends Diana was determined to become Princess of Wales and eventually queen. Diana was emotionally unstable and unfit for the duties of the royal family. Diana wanted titles and palaces and fame and money and balcony appearances and clothes and jewelry and vacations and notoriety and prestige and financial stability and.... But did Diana ever want Charles? If Charles was a butcher or a baker or a candle stick maker would Diana have married Charles?

@reginadoggett9921

29 күн бұрын

He stood for it because they had more power over him. Thirty years later it would have been ridiculous to tell a man at sixty whom he could marry. The only problem afterwards was Camilla's future rank, whether she would be a queen consort or a princess consort.

@user-sv7fd6es6s

29 күн бұрын

@@reginadoggett9921 well she is a Queen Consort now

Love Charles brilliant man excellent KING 👑 ❤

@melissacarterpresley5786

Ай бұрын

You have great jokes. :)