Perhaps the very idea of "Judaic/Christian" origins is a misnomer. Why not "Judaic/Christian/Islamic" or "Zoroastrian/Judaic/Christian" or "Mithraic"? There's a thought thread regarding "Gov't and religion as a guide to a self-policing society". Throw in Huxley for pharmacea.
@theskippy73 жыл бұрын
When you,re regurgitating a story the Vatican gave you in 1585,you,re still only regurgitating a story. How about studying Sherlock Holmes next,you,ll be able to tell us what the book said about who,what,how,where and when,but its still ONLY A BOOK.
Пікірлер: 2
Perhaps the very idea of "Judaic/Christian" origins is a misnomer. Why not "Judaic/Christian/Islamic" or "Zoroastrian/Judaic/Christian" or "Mithraic"? There's a thought thread regarding "Gov't and religion as a guide to a self-policing society". Throw in Huxley for pharmacea.
When you,re regurgitating a story the Vatican gave you in 1585,you,re still only regurgitating a story. How about studying Sherlock Holmes next,you,ll be able to tell us what the book said about who,what,how,where and when,but its still ONLY A BOOK.