After objecting a COBI, because child protection in another state substantiated child abuse with another court entering a default judgement so the cps finding stands but the Ti said that’s not enough to say the other parent is unfit and my jaw drops.

it’s Kayden’s law. in PA we have ‘abuse’ as a legal term. there is no legal domestic violence, but the local protection organizations promote a list of over 140 types of DV. this means you can basically accuse anyone in a domestic relationship of DV unless their angels. Court gave me supervised visitation “without prejudice” based on these accusations. my attorney warned me not to make them back lest the kids be taken from us both. i spent $4k on visits until the kids stopped coming. Kayden’s Law is not Constitutional, but it seems neither is Family Court. i don’t see how the State has the right or the capacity to determine what’s in the near interests of children they don’t know or love who’s parent’s are not deemed unfit or negligent.

NY state is very different. Abuse is allowed, tolerated. Good luck

Hi, quick question from Arizona. Would the domestic violence subsection apply if the maternal grandfather assaulted the mother in front of the kids? I cut him off after and now the father allows him contact during his time and is seeking a modification to allow the grandfather more time.

In the example of certain professions (Dr, RN, pilot) fighting for equal parenting time, who have to rely on child care of some sort during their parenting time, ie: - Step parents - the newest spouse. - Paid care - nanny, baby sitter. - Family members - siblings (aunt, uncle of child) grandparents, etc. Parents who are facing this, and truly want time with their children, must get creative to make opportunities to see their children. Example of creativity - A case I am familiar with, the father worked a night shift. The child was about 1 year old at the time. A grandparent was caring for the child during work hours, and during the day time whole the father slept. The mother did not want more time w the child, she defined the amount of time she wanted, the judge amd father agreed. Mother didn't want 1st right of refusal, the right to have the child if the father was not able to care for the child during his time. It was the grandmother's idea, to bring the child to the father during his work hours, father planned to take a break, spend some time w his child. Sometimes it was brief, but they saw, each other, talked, touched, enjoyed a meal together, spent time together. It was so good for both father and child. Be creative. NOT BC YOU WANT TO PROVE TO THE JUDGE, BC YOU WANT TIME W YOUR CHILD. If a parent shows sincere effort, go to interesting seemingly impractical, unusual lengths to see and spend time with his or her child, to maximize, utilize their parenting time w their child, and continue in their career, I do not see how a judge can refuse that parent of equal time w their own child. Be creative, use your resources to make it as simple as possible for the caretaker to bring the child to you, the parent, or meet - at a park, somewhere that meets the needs and interests of the child's stage of life. Make simple memories. Though it may not be/likely will not be a simple undertaking, try, then try something else, find a caretaker who will work for the goal of the best parent child relationship outcome. If the caretaker does not work out, try another one. Try sharing the experience of bringing the child with, not only paid caretakers, include grandparents, aunts/uncle's trusted family members to share in providing this opportunity for parent and child to bond, build their relationship. It was a great adventure for the example of the 1 yo I mentioned. The father was so uplifted, encouraged, he treasured that short time he would not have gotten during his child's daily awake time. I won't go back and proof read. I think whatever grammatical error, most should be able to grasp the idea. God speed.

19:34 dangerous to state that a child only wants to see one parent over another, bc the other lets them do anything they want- my abusive ex made this claim when my daughter was fearful to return to him- she knows what she has to deal with, it’s abuse not structure

How does one go from hearing to trial? Out to that point of final judgment?

what about morality abuse

Have you ever known a child to move back to the mother after mental health breakdown (bipolar) when the Father has had temporary custody for 1 year +

Complacent

I was told by your staff you won’t consult with anyone outside Arizona… :(

Buenos dias puedo optener el número

Please can you help my daughter?

I find it sad that in a video about challenging custody presumptions, you approach the topic of DV with the presumption that "dad is abusive to mom". Latest stats show that the gender ratio of DV offenders is ~50:50. Please don't criminalize 50% of the population by assumption.

She is funny as soon as that female said that the father is doing this and that and her child's coming up with rashes and she doesn't recognize her child but she couldn't explain what you was talking about That's all obviously lies and you see how these two lawyer females just believed her instead of telling her you got to have actual proof and that is true and have evidence they asked her she couldn't even explain it That's a problem in those family courts of these lawyers just believe in whatever the woman tells them they got to stop that women lie 95% of the time if something really is happening to her kids that she should have evidence proof and able to have no problem explaining what's the problem with proof they don't they just expect you to believe them because that's what women to women always do and 95% of the time they're lying