Very well done and informative review. It answered all my questions and provided excellent information and context for comparing binoculars. Great job!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Paul, Glad it was helpful and many thanks for the feedback, it is very much appreciated.

I own well over 20 pair of binoculars including all of the alphas on the market. I expect optical excellence from a $2k plus set but I love to search for inexpensive sets that also have excellent optics. Lately 8x32 is my favorite size as they can be taken on walks comfortably unlike larger bins. I have been comparing these Trailseeker ED's with my 8x30 Nikon HG's ($1000) and although not as good I find it amazing how close they compare. The Nikons do everything better but only by a very slim margin and I mean slim. That says alot because the HG's are amazing in every way. For the price these are a no brainer imo especially in 8x32 form. They might not be alpha quality but they are knocking on the door imo. I plan on keeping these which also says alot as I have high standards these days and have given away many pairs because I refuse to look through them.

@brianwood1041

Жыл бұрын

Lolololol,. You definitely know excess , and pleasure , yet all those binoculars, shows your not happy .

@givemelbrty

9 ай бұрын

I agree with your praise of these binos. I hands-on tested TrailSeeker ED 8x32 against 10 other binoculars and these are the ones I kept. Very impressive brightness and clarity.

@milesgthomas

8 ай бұрын

Any idea how they compare with Kowa's BD II XD binoculars?

Excellent channel thank you you are very thorough on your description and make it very understandable..

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks and I really appreciate that 👍

Many thanks for the review. I was eying up the Nikon monarch 5 initially . It swayed me to buy these and looking forward to getting my hands on them in the next couple of days. 👍

@Bestbinocularsreviews

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Peter, thanks for the comment - for the price, I do think these are excellent. Please let us know how you find them once you have had a chance to use them.

@markqiao

2 жыл бұрын

Monarch 5 field of view seem too small in comparison to alternatives

Hello, really great video! I am thinking about purchasing the Hawke Frontier ED X 8x42 and I have seen your detailed review on the BBR website. However, I am wondering if the optical quality of the Hawke is better than that of the Athlon Midas 8x42, which has similar optical specs. Moreover, I have heard a couple viewpoints that the Hawke is prone to glare issues. What is your opinion on this? Thank you.

Love your review!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks so much Franz. Very much appreciate your kind words and glad/hope it helped?

Thank you for this review.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

My pleasure and thanks for saying thanks - much appreciated 👍😜

So helpful! Thank you!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

You're so welcome! And many thanks for the kind words 👍

A very holistic review Jason, appreciate the in-depth analysis including the cross section view of the innards which was quite unexpected. Considering these for bird watching and comparing them with the Zeiss Terra, which would you recommend?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

Жыл бұрын

Hi Mukund. Thanks for the kind words - It is hard for me to say with complete confidence as I have not tested the Zeiss Terra, but as you know the brand comes with as good a reputation as you can get - the Terra series is their response to the mid-level market which is very competitive.

I love your KZread reviews and your website. It has helped me narrow down my search immensely. The Athlon Midas. Celestron Trail Seeker, and Carson ED are all in the mix. I did not see any Leupold products on your site, however. I always thought they were a good product, and wonder if they simply did not make to cut? I was looking at the Alpine.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Sleddog - many thanks for the comment and kind words, much appreciated. As for Leupold binoculars, no It is not that I don't feel they are not a good product, it is just that they have never wanted to send me any to test and review and thus I cannot form any sort of knowledgeable opinion on them without having tested them. Hope you understand.

@sleddog8

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews Awesome. Thank you for getting back to me.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

@@sleddog8 Most welcome :-)

Jason, I've just found your channel and love the reviews you are producing. The structure, layout and content are easy to follow and very comprehensive. You make it easy to compare different options. I'm currently considering the Celestron 8x42 ED binos but your Hawke frontier ED X reviews also caught my eye. You seem to regard both options highly having rewarded each in its own category. There are a couple of price brackets difference between the two (in terms of your review categories). Are the Hawkes worth the extra money? My main use will be insects in open and covered areas and in varying light conditions. I also have to carry quite a bit of camera gear, so the 8x32s might be an option. BTW, have you ever considered reviewing the Avalon pros or do you have a view on them?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

2 жыл бұрын

Hi SC - thanks for the comment and sorry for the late reply - I have been away on holiday. In answer as to if the Hawke Frontier ED X www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Hawke-Frontier-8x42-ED-X-Binoculars-Review-232.htm is worth the extra money - it all depends. With binoculars, you definitely get diminishing returns the more you spend, and thus once you get to the level of something like the Celestron 8x42 ED binos that a really good for the price, every small increase from then costs more and more. So yes the Hawkes are better, but the difference is not as much as say comparing a cheap $40 bino to the Celestron's. So is it worth it - that depends on how much you value the extra money you need to spend on them - so for some, the answer will be Yes, others No. Hope this makes sense? As to the 32mm options - yes a good idea if you carry a lot of other gear, but just be aware of the downsides as well, if unsure take a look at my article and video on 8x32 vs 8x42 Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/8x32-vs-8x42-binoculars-11/

@boyztoyz121

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews thanks, Jason.

Hi from India Thanks for your excellent review. I got rid of my Skymaster with its mis-aligned optics and ordered this binos upon reading your review. Eventhough I loved the Skymaster for astronomy , it had some quality control issues. May be I should try the pro version.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Sreeram, yes I have tested both and as I write in my review of the Celestron 15x70 SkyMaster Pro (www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Celestron-SkyMaster-Pro-15x70-Binoculars-Review-259.htm) They are far superior and really cannot emphasize how much I would suggest getting a version of these over the standard Skymaster Series.

EXCELLENT REVIEW.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you kindly! Hope it helped in your decision making?

Muchas gracias, hoy recibí mis binoculares Celestron y estoy muy contento con mi compra y muchas gracias por tu video y por tu revisión en tu página que también la leí completa, un saludo y un abrazo, saludos desde chile

Entregas una información excelente. Se agradece que compartas estos datos con tan buenos detalles. Esta semana me compro este modelo :) Saludos desde tierras Pehuenches.

How do these compare to the vortex viper HD optically? Especially in low light/dusk condition? Thanks

Nice review.

Nice and easy to understand videos, thank you for your hard work. I'm looking for my first pair of binoculars that will last for years without any issues. May I ask what is the essential difference between the Celestron DB 8x42 and Trailseeker 8x42? Does it worth the extra money? Also, thinking about the Celestron Nature DX and Vortex Diamondback HD - I can't find any reviews of 8x42 and/vs 12x50 and/vs 15/56 with the explanation of the futures and the price deferences. Is any promo discount or best deal available in the UK? Thanks for your advices. (Vitaly)

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hello Vitalie - thanks for the questions, unfortunately it is a bit hard for me to answer them all thoroughly here in the comments section. But take a look at my buyers guides: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/guides/ and in particular the ones on How to Choose Between Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/ and What To Look For When Buying Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/guides/what-to-look-for-when-buying-binoculars.php - these should help.

between those and the Nature DX ED which one you recommend to buy

Ooh I love the look of these! But would it be worth spending a little more to get the hawke frontiers you recommended for best birding binocs of 2019? 🤔 Just discovering this channel. Great work! Learning a lot.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

hi, take a look at this review as well as the Hawke Frontier one: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Hawke-Frontier-8x42-ED-X-Binoculars-Review-232.htm and carefully compare them in different areas to get the one which is strongest in the areas that are most important to you. I break the total score down into different sections which can help.

Hi mate, I just stumbled onto your channel, your reviews are awesome! I suscribed on the spot! Now, I am in the market for a pair of new binos and would appreciate your opinion and advice between the Celestron Trailseeker ED 8x42 and the Steiner Wildlife 8x42 binoculars. I use binos for wildlife spotting at all times, but also at dawn and dusk for hunting and spotting game. So I am looking for an "compact" alrounder , and value for money, but I am happy to pay extra for better value. Thanks so much.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, thanks for your question and for subscribing - It is very much appreciated. It is hard for me to answer it completely as I have not yet tested the Steiner Wildlife 8x42 binoculars, so I can't comment on the views between them. But in general, my experience with Steiner binoculars has always been very good and I like the brand. I recommend taking a close look and comparing the specifications and features next: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/ - Also this article should help: How to Choose Binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/how-to-choose-binoculars-05/ Once you have done this see if any of the specs that are important stick out between each of them. Then see if can you get a good deal on one over the other, or sometimes if they are still even, it can just come down to which brand or which pair you like the look of the most. I hope this helps. If not and you want more personal attention, I am more than happy to help you out more, do some research, compare the stats and delve deeper into your specific needs, but it is hard to do so in this small comments section and will also take my time to do the research for you - So if you are interested and want to support the channel why not "hire" me as your personal bino advisor. More details here: www.patreon.com/bestbinocularsreviews

Thank you for the reviews. Are you considering making a review on the Celestron Nature DX ED? What’s the biggest differents between the TrailSeeker and the Nature ED, beside perhaps the build quality?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, thanks for the quiestion. Celestron send me through quite a lot of binoculars to test (see all my Celestron reviews here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binocular-brand-Celestron-Binoculars.html ) and I have a good relationship with them and so whilst I don't have any Celestron Nature DX ED's with me at the moment. It may happen, but not in the foreseeable future I'm afraid. I could do an in-depth guide and research into the differences between all the different ranges that you are insured in for you. Would take time and work, so if you are interested, perhaps you would consider hiring me (the Binowizard): www.patreon.com/bestbinocularsreviews

@roostern

4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the reply. I enjoyed reading a lot of your reviews and guidenings. I’m quite a ‘nerd’ when I invest in new products, so I seached the web to narrow down my options for binuculars in my price level. I ended up buying the Nature ED yesterday because of the good reviews on the original Nature DX, and because it seems, that the new versions is quite a step up on different parametres. But I am wondering why I could only find one review on the new model, since it seems, that it’s one of Celestrons new big lines. And then I thought of your webpage and how nice it would be if you had made a review on the ED version. Unfortunately I don’t have the budget to hire you, even though it would be cool. 😊

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

@@roostern There really are not many REAL binocular review sites out there, most are written by people who never touch the binocular and usually know very little about binoculars and indeed optics in general and so I think that is the reason for so few "real" reviews. For me there is only so much I can do - For each review I do I like to test the instrument for at least a couple of weeks and then each binocular takes me about a week to research, write about, photograph and then even more if I also make a video review. Anyway glad to hear that you purchased them and thanks for the feedback - perhaps you could write a small review on them once you have had time to use them - I would be happy to publish your thoughts on BBR 😜👍

Great review Jason, these Celestron look good from the outside and reading your review they seem to have good optics! How do they stack up against Nikon Monarch 7 ?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, thanks for the q - unfortunately I have not tested the Nikon Monarch 7, so in terms of the view, I really cannot say. You can compare their stats which should give you a good idea though - her is how I do it: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/

hello! I hope you see this. For birdwatching, if both are at the same price, would you choose the vortex viper HD 10x42 (Old version before the new 2018 version) or these celestron trailseeker ED 8x42?

Performance wise which one is better? Nikon monarch 7 8x42 or this celestron model.

Thank you for your dedication and commitment to all of your thorough and outstanding reviews on BBR. I have insofar been completely in agreement with your reviews of all the binoculars I have either owned or tested, however, I have been unable to test the Celestron Trailseeker ED 8x42 and Kowa BD II 8x42 XD binoculars side by side. Have you tried the Kowa BD II 8x42 XD binoculars yet and how do they compare with the Celestron Trailseeker ED 8x42 binoculars?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

8 ай бұрын

You are welcome and thanks for the feedback - much appreciated - As of yet I have not used the newer Kowa BD binoculars, so hard to say, but my experience of the brand has always been on the positive side. Quality is usually very good, their downside is usually that outside of the birding world the brand is not that well known.

@milesgthomas

8 ай бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thank you for your prompt reply. On another note, I can highly recommend the Opticron Verano BGA VHD 8x32 if you get the chance to try it. The new Verano now has a clockwise focuser, they are ergonomically and optically excellent. They're in the sale at the moment and I picked mine up for the bargain price of £299. I love JPN optics.

I have been reading so much on binocs... Guess your channel is where I should decide finally Which one is better trailseeker 71404 non ED ones.. The ED ones for the same r double the price in Australia.. Budget is under 200$ Thanks in advance..

is it worth it to get a zeiss conquest hd 8x42 for the night sky as compared to this?

I wanted to know the best portable binoculars I can buy with a good image quality. If you would tell it would be very grateful of you.

Please suggest.... Which one is better?.. Chelestron nature dx ed 8x42 vs Bresser pirsch ed 8x42.

Do you recommend ED glasses for astronomical binoculars? Is colour dispersion only issue at the edges of the view compared to center of the view?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, yes, reducing color fringing is certainly desirable, for all uses, but very important in astronomy. Just beware not all ED glass binoculars actually perform better than non-ed binoculars - there are many other factors and I have seen many well made non-ed glass binoculars show less color fringing than poor ED glass binoculars. I have more info here: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/extra-low-dispersion-glass-ed-glass-09/

Helpful review ta. Any chance you could do a Celestron Trailseeker 10 x 42 review? Or even just add a few comments here and I will check back. Cheers

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, thanks for the kind words. In terms of the build quality, components and optics and coatings, 10x42 will be pretty much identical to the 8x42 model. The main differences will be down to the different magnifications and how it affects a binocular. For more on this check out my article and video on 8x42 vs 10x42 Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/8x42-vs-10x42-binoculars-10/

Hello Jason, I would like in having a suggestion on weather it might be better for me a Nikon Monarch 5 8x42 or a Celestron Nature DX ED 8x42. I mainly need a good low light binocular (portable) for wildlife photography (usually going out at down or dusk in shrub and woodlands) so I can scout the area. It seems (to me) both share pretty similar features (honestly Nature DX ED is very difficult to find but I read about very narrow Field of View of the Nikon. Also, I don't know what change between Nature DX ED and and trailseeker ED. They look identical to me. That's said do you have any suggestion? I have zero experience in Binoculars but I arrived at the point where I need one since would be extremely useful to detect potential roe deers or other mammals nearby. Thanks in advance.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Alex. Hope I can help. Unfortunately, I have not tested any of the Nikon Monarch 5's so can't comment on the view. But just check the specifications and see what their FOV is and compare it to the other models you are interested in. You are right, the Nature DX ED and TrailSeeker ED ranges look and indeed are very similar and it can get quite confusing! However, they are different and must use a different optical system, you can see this by the fact that the field of view on the TrailSeeker ED is wider. This is good, but for me, the most important difference is that the TrailSeeker ED uses very highly reflective dielectric coatings on the roof prisms. I have just checked and there is no mention of this on the Nature DX ED specifications and thus I think I am correct in my assumption that they do not have these and will rather use the cheaper and less reflective silver mirror coated prisms. Now is this bad? No, not at all, just not as good as dielectric coatings. As you can see from my review www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Celestron-TrailSeeker-ED-8x42-Binoculars-review-253.htm I think the TrailSeeker ED is truly an excellent binocular for the money and tough to bet. Another option and another very similar binocular in this kind of price range is the Hawke Frontier 8x42 ED X www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Hawke-Frontier-8x42-ED-X-Binoculars-Review-232.htm - either way for the money you will find these hards to beat - Also I have just checked to confirm that the Nikon Monarch 5 so also uses dielectric coated prisms, so it is just a pity that their field of view is relatively narrow.....

I really like your channel. I owned a pair of Athlon midas 8x42 but i got rid of them. They were excellent binos. Im now looking to buy another 8x42 which will be between the Athlon Midas Ed Generation 2 or the Celestron trailseekers ED. Both binos seem very comparable in the specs. I think the celestrons have a very nice look to them, The body style is different and really sharp looking. But im looking for the best views between these two brands. Which do you recommend?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Jeff, thanks for your question. It is hard for me to answer as I have not yet tested the new Athlon Midas Ed binoculars, so I can't comment on the views. I usually recommend talking a close look and comparing the specs next: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/ - but you say that you have already done this. Did any of their specs stick out between each other, can you get a good deal on one over the other, or sometimes it can just comes down to which brand or which pair you like the look of the most.

@jeffwoodard

4 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews They seem very close in the specs. The athlon my have a few more feet wider field of view but i think i will go with the celestron. I really like the look of them. Thank you and keep up the great work.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

@@jeffwoodard Hi Jeff - you are welcome and I am sure you will be happy with them - for the price they are tough to beat. Please drop by and let us know your thoughts once you have had a chance to use them. All the best.

Nic Vid!!! Question; which binoculars would you recommend for hiking, birds, outdoor under $500 or so? Could you give a few models? Celestron? Bushnell? Steiner? Thanks for your help... 8/10 x 42 I am assuming...

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, a 42mm binocular is fine if you don't have much gear or only your binoculars with you. If you have a backpack ad lots of other equipment, you may wish to consider a mid-size 32mm instrument instead. A good place to start is to take a look at the best performing binoculars I have tested in the mid-high end category (approx: $300 - $500 / £300 - £500) www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/binoculars-best-value.php#4 - All of these I would recommend. Hope this helps.

@TheTrailDancer

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews Thanks! I was wondering about Steiner and Celestron BC I have friends that work at these companies and they have given me a small discount code. Are they both good? Which Steiners do you like? Peregrine? Blue?

Hi, I looking for a new binoculars for watching on birds, I I thinking on Nikon Monarch 5 or Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 What is your recommendation for buying? Thank for your help!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, many thanks for the question. I have not used or tested any models from the Nikon Monarch 5 series, so it is hard for me to say definitely with any sort of authority which is best between the two. I do however have an article on How to Choose Between Binoculars www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/ which i think will help and I am more than happy to help you out more, do some research, compare the stats and delve deeper into your specific needs, but it is hard to do so in this small comments section and will also take my time to do the research for you - So if you are interested and want to support the channel why not "hire" me as your personal bino advisor. More details here: www.patreon.com/bestbinocularsreviews

Hello! Great review. I am currently in search of a binocular - which will be used mostly for jungle safaris & bird watching. As per my budget and reading your reviews I had narrowed down my choice to the Vanguard Endeavor ED II 8x42. But After seeing/reading this Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 review now I am confused! It would be great if you can please guide me choose one among these two models. Thanks much.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi - thanks for the comment and kind words, much appreciated. As for the two models on your list - both are excellent value and perform very well at the price range. So it will come down to which has the best specs in the areas that are important to you. I explain how I do this here in my guide on how to choose between binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/which-binoculars-to-choose-08/ if the specs are similar and you still can't decide, it can often come down to which is on sale, or which you like the look of most - I find I much prefer using binoculars that look and feel right to me. Hope this helps, if you still can't decide which to go for, let me know and I will see if I can help further.

@aboltabol73

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews thanks much for your quick reply. The only real world difference I can see between the two is the angle of view. I believe in that section the Celestron TrailSeeker ED 8x42 might be slightly ahead. I have asked my local dealer for the best price for both and am waiting for the same. I also have the pricing from amazon India but only for the Vanguard. Will let you know.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

No problem - and yes, please do let me know once they come back to you and which you choose - I have not checked how much difference there is in the field of view between these two, but a wider view is certainly something I would rate as important for viewing birds at closer ranges, like in a jungle.

@aboltabol73

3 жыл бұрын

@@Bestbinocularsreviews hello! Hope you are doing well. I have finally bought the Vanguard Endeavor ED II as the Celestron Trailseeker ED is not available with multiple dealers. I paid around US$ 274 for the Vanguard Endeavor ED II and received it yesterday. Haven't got much time to play with it, but my initial expression is like "wow" - superb build quality, fantastic low light performance. Thanks much for your guidance.

Hello! I really like your reviews. I was wondering what is your benchmark binocular that you compared this against. Thank you!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi Daniel, Thanks for the kind words and the question. I like to keep the binoculars that I use as benchmarks anonymous, partly because it is actually irrelevant and I feel it can be unfair to the binocular I am testing depending on the price bracket. With my 8x42 reviews I actually use a couple of benchmarks. Firstly I use the original pair that I started with many, many years ago and which i have used for just about every 8x42 review written! These are a mid range instrument and is no longer in production. I also use my high-end, what I would describe as an "alpha" level 8x42 as well. BTW: If you delve very deep into the BBR website www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/ and go back to some of my very first reviews (which are a bit embarrassing to read now, I have to say!) , you could probably work out which ones I use ;-)

Hi. Would you say these are good enough for night sky observation with it's light power and field of view and weather condition proof and clear image and so on? Would you recommend someting else to consider in terms of wide view, excellent image (exit pupil 5,3) and price? Thank You!

@indreksiilak8463

4 жыл бұрын

Also I wanted to ask about edge vision and clear focus area. I have read a comment that complains that "edge vision is poor and the clear focus area is too small". Do you still have those binos with you to answer this from direct inspection and not from memory? Thank You!

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Yes, you can definitely use an 8x42 for astronomy, but if that is your main purpose then there may be other options that you should consider. For example depending on your needs a 7x50 or 10x50 may be a better choice - for more I would suggest taking a look at my guides to astronomy binoculars: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/astronomy/

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Take a look at my full review where I go over the image quality and what I saw when testing them including the level if image softening at the edges of the view in great detail in the optics section: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Celestron-TrailSeeker-ED-8x42-Binoculars-review-253.htm

Great video, great accent 👌🏼

@Bestbinocularsreviews

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Hugh, Thank you for the comment and feedback, much appreciated

How do they compare to the monarch 7 and vortex vipers? Now that you have tested them all?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Shaun, I would say they compare well against the Vortex Vipers - although I tested a pair of those many, many years ago, so hard to remember everything. Whilst I have used them at trade shows and in store, I have not yet fully tested the Monarch 7 as Nikon are pretty hard (actually impossible so far!) to get hold of in regards to sending me samples and so I cannot really make a informed comment in this regard.

What's the difference between these and the Celestron Granites? Seems like they upgraded the Trailseekers to the equivalent of the Granites.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Jason, yes you are right they are quite similar - I think it largely comes down to the body style with the Granites having an open bridge design: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/celestron-binoculars.php

One issue I had with your website was my inability to get a side by side comparison of these against the Maven 1.2 8x42; because with the upgraded ED glass and Magnesium focus wheel, these seem like a head to head budget version of the Maven 1.2. PS, I love your site and your reviews. PPS, I am leaning towards getting these for my wife for bird watching and the Maven 11x45 for me for hunting, birding and star gazing.

What is the difference between8×42 and 8×16×50 zoom

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi, an 8x42 binocular has an 8x magnification and 42mm objective lenses, whilst the 8-16×50 binocular has a variable (zoom) magnification of between 8x and 16x and 50mm objective lenses. For more take a look at my video and guide to What Binocular Numbers Mean: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/binocular-numbers-mean-12/

Celestron 10x50 Granite Binocular are they the same quality ?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Bill, Yes, I would say they are very similar in terms of quality - it is the open-bridge body design that is the main difference: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Celestron8x42Granite-93.htm

Review wingspan nature hawks please

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

Hi, I would love to, but every time I've reached out to them to get a smaple, they have never responded and I have done so a number of times. Hopefully, @WingspanOptics see this comment :-)

@luckyPiston

4 жыл бұрын

You could buy a pair and send them to BBR so everyone can benefit that way.

Hi ,how many price in this one

@Bestbinocularsreviews

3 жыл бұрын

Hi Abdul, I have links on where you can buy them in a number of countries on the review on BBR: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/Celestron-TrailSeeker-ED-8x42-Binoculars-review-253.htm - but their price range is around $285 / £285 / €300 when I tested them. Hope this helps.

Can I assume that the 10x42 will have the same rating ?

@Bestbinocularsreviews

2 жыл бұрын

Hi, yes in terms of the build quality, weight, component, etc, they will be exactly the same - however aspects like the field of view, eye-relief and close focus will be different - for the main differences between 8x42 and 10x42 binoculars do check out my guide and video which should help you decide which is best for your needs: www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/blog/8x42-vs-10x42-binoculars-10/

I shouldn't but I so want to buy this!🙃🙄

@Bestbinocularsreviews

4 жыл бұрын

... go on you know you want to!! .. just make sure you go through BBR to support the site 👍😜 www.bestbinocularsreviews.com/buy-binoculars.php?binocular=Celestron8x42TrailSeeker%20ED&id=253

GPO passion ed 8x42 or this one? 👀

@Bestbinocularsreviews

Жыл бұрын

Oogh that is a tough one - both a v.good and similar specs and features. Quite often it can come down to which brand you like the most or which bino you like the look of (this is important as you need to like using it) or you can go with which one you can get the best price on the GPO is a little more expensive usually?

@MrAndras18

Жыл бұрын

​@@Bestbinocularsreviews Yes.. for me the GPO looks much better, actually here in europe the gpo is cheaper( costs ~125 euro less). But for me the focusing wheel is a dealbreaker some expensive binos has terrible focusing.. in the celestron regal the 1.5 closefocus is very appealing though. It is annoying that there is no shop where we could compare them on hand, it would be much easier..

Looks like they cut back on the accessories in favour of better features on the instrument themselves.

@Bestbinocularsreviews

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, kind of and generally I am in favor of it.. to a point. I would hate binoculars to go the way of cameras, where you get almost no accessories included.

can you review looking through an actual potato?