RIP Orson Welles (May 6, 1915 - October 10, 1985), aged 70 And RIP Peter Sellers (September 8, 1925 - July 24, 1980), aged 54 You both will always be remembered as legends.

@georgespalding7640

2 жыл бұрын

Two of the great Legends in movie history.....One for being a genius film maker and One for being a genius comedic actor.

@saftpackerl

2 жыл бұрын

Their massive egos clashed hard in this production. Most of the scenes are filmed without the opposite even present...

@HenryCasillas

2 жыл бұрын

💜

@superyerfdog

Жыл бұрын

Peter Sellers was a jackass who walked off the set and didn't come back because his fragile ego was hurt

@wellesradio

Ай бұрын

@@saftpackerlMainly it was Sellers being the problem. Yes, Orson Welles had an ego the size of Orson Welles, but he was professional with everyone involved who took the film seriously. It was only Sellers’s shenanigans that he couldn’t put up with. Still, Welles didn’t try to bring the production to a halt like Sellers did. Sellers acted like a baby and Welles goaded him with comments that showed him that he was far beyond being intimidated. To think that it all started because Peter Sellers was trying to impress Princess Margaret and she instead spent the entire evening catching up with Orson Welles whom she was delighted to see, having met decades prior. Pure jealousy by a mentally unstable Peter Sellers. Orson walked away laughing and Peter Sellers was fired.

The best delivery of the line "Goodbye, Mr. Bond" in any of the movies.

@acewilliams7917

2 жыл бұрын

But coming from Orson Wells, there would be no Bond.

@davidpainter5215

2 жыл бұрын

no

@M1tjakaramazov

2 ай бұрын

It was pretty cold yes

This almost feels like a Casino Royale from an alternate reality.

@KJ_1810

2 жыл бұрын

It is 😂

@commandingjudgedredd1841

2 жыл бұрын

Without scratching Bond's "little itch".

@raymeester7883

2 жыл бұрын

It was.

@mannydel1

2 жыл бұрын

@@commandingjudgedredd1841 What a scene that would be.

@nikodimser8225

2 жыл бұрын

Version with Daniel Graig much better!

I don’t care that it’s parody. I think we’d all love to see Orson Welles as a faithful version of Le Chiffre.

Orson Welles. One of the greatest voices ever on screen.

@bogeythedog163

2 жыл бұрын

Richard Burton is the other

If Orson was to carry out the same torture technique that Le Chiffre does in the 2006 Casino Royale, lets face it, Peter's balls would be smashed in one blow.

@kaibricturner8836

2 жыл бұрын

LMAO 😂😂😂😂

@Matteo-ks6fn

2 жыл бұрын

Nope. He would have used Kato's as a decoy...

@jockejocke1

2 жыл бұрын

The old take someone elses balls as a decoy ploy, eh?

@commanderkeen3787

2 жыл бұрын

Orson would have simply eaten Peter's balls OMNOMNOMNOMNOM

@half-lifescientist1991

2 жыл бұрын

"They're even better when they're crushed!"

Admittedly, Orson Welles wasn't a bad choice for Le Chiffre. It's just a pity that they couldn't cast him in a serious adaptation of the novel.

@michaelschramm1064

2 жыл бұрын

@Jay What a brilliant stroke of insight! I never thought of that…such a brilliant director he was too, surpassing even his acting mettle. Some fans lament that Hitchcock never quite made the cut to direct one of the 007 films, but involving Welles rather, is now to me perhaps the greatest “what might have been”!

@michaelschramm1064

2 жыл бұрын

@Jay Yes! And N X NW composer Bernard Herrmann himself declared it “the forerunner of all the James Bond movies”.

@michaelschramm1064

2 жыл бұрын

@Jay True, “Citizen Kane”, “Jane Eyre” and “The Magnificent Ambersons” are sublime for their avant-garde filmic/musical aura. Such a shame they didn’t collaborate more, for example on “The Third Man” and “Touch of Evil”.

@michaelschramm1064

2 жыл бұрын

@Jay Yes, but at any rate what a perfect film for Herrmann to have been the composer for.

@spittincobra1887

2 жыл бұрын

Had a serious adaptation with the Daniel Craig version.

James Bond looks like a Big Bang Theory character playing cosplay.

@teddingtonbear3265

2 жыл бұрын

there were more than one james bond in this movie.

@epicon6

2 жыл бұрын

Still better than Daniel Graig

@byronkleoyang

2 жыл бұрын

@Martin Lee Craig was great. It was the writers and creative team behind Craig that only delivered 60-70 percent effectiveness. Craig's Bonds could have been better, but they are good for what they are. Just good, middle of the road popcorn movie.

@SaaErDetNok

2 жыл бұрын

Only that isn't James Bond. The role of James Bond is played by David Niven.

@byronkleoyang

2 жыл бұрын

@thatdudefromearth Explain?

So....I can't be the only one who wishes we could have Orson Welles as a real Bond villain right? I mean like actually going up against Sean Connery or Roger Moore, not whatever this movie was suppose to be. Because I think if he was in a serious Bond film, Mr. Welles could have made a very memorable Bond Villain

@ricarleite

5 жыл бұрын

He took the job under the impression it was a serious Bond film - and the amount of footage they took of him was actually serious. He also demanded to be allowed to do a magic trick in the film, which he did. However this film was a clusterfuck of a mess, several directors shooting different material, lack of consistent tone and plot. Peter Sellers originally wanted to actually PLAY Bond seriously, replacing Sean Connery. Then he settled on a humorous, light Bond (kinda like Roger Moore did), but he walked away when he realized the movie was becoming a mess.

@psychedeliccarrie5921

4 жыл бұрын

@@ricarleite It's like what they did with George C. Scott in Dr. Strangelove.

@drspaseebo410

4 жыл бұрын

WOW! YES!!

@houstonhelicoptertours1006

3 жыл бұрын

Shoulda. Woulda. Coulda.

@nuffzed2001

3 жыл бұрын

the story was Peter sellers was intimidated by orson Welles and he shot his scenes in separate studios then again, its pretty easy to be intimidated by Orson Welles! Very scary looking man

Peter Sellers sounds so smooth in this film, it’s such a change from him doing all the dorky accents.

@engrey

2 жыл бұрын

It's hard to take him serious after seeing him in so many comedies.

@GAFloppa

2 жыл бұрын

Du yeu 'ave a licence?

Jonathan Frakes is looking well all things considered

@timkluntz8362

2 жыл бұрын

You ever play Baccarat against James Bond?

@sprittel

2 жыл бұрын

@@timkluntz8362 No, but I did play Baccarat with him once

@sprittel

2 жыл бұрын

@Sean Culp Unfortunately Orson Wells is not looking well but it would perhaps be truer to say that Jonathan Frakes is looking Orson Wells

@Sk_127

2 жыл бұрын

“Computer end program”

@dinojay8410

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂👍 ... uncanny resemblance between him and Orson Wells! Ahh, "we shall sell no wine before its time" 😄😄

Fun fact- the two blondes are my grandma and great auntie 😊

@JustSomeDamnCalifornian45

Ай бұрын

Are they still alive?

@aimeelover9818

Ай бұрын

Yess there both still alive 💓

@erikh9991

Ай бұрын

How cool! Hopefully they shared some really fun stories.

That look of Orson's at the end was genuinely frightening. A man crossed. Never get that from the official villains before, as great as many of them were.

@visionist7

2 жыл бұрын

1:56

This is the only scene in the entire movie (if I may call it such) worth watching. They should've built an actual Bond flick around these two.

@andik70

2 жыл бұрын

I switched off the movie before reaching this scene. It looks almost like it was taken from a different, great movie.

@bfish89ryuhayabusa

2 жыл бұрын

@@andik70 It kind of is. The movie was made as an anthology of vignettes that loosely (allegedly) form a whole movie. Each piece was made by a different director, so they're all kind of different movies.

@snazzle9764

10 ай бұрын

Supposedly Sellers stormed off set, and caused the film to be the series of vignettes it is now since they couldn't Sellers to film the rest of the movie

Orson welles was a class act so ahead of his time. A total visionary

@plshelpmeawkdough

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah until you hear how childish he was being while filming this movie lmaooo

@MrDash03

9 ай бұрын

@@plshelpmeawkdoughPeter Sellers was way worse He even shot a gun loaded with blanks in Jacqueline Bisset’s face after losing his temper with her which ended up burning her face

Thie scene shows how amazing Welles is: he blasts Sellers, who was fantastic himself, off the stage.

Orson Welles spent most of his life being serious within a comedy.

This movie is underrated in my opinion. Lots of cameos of some legendary actors.Very 60s! Groovy baby!!

@loanaoftheshellpeople5627

2 жыл бұрын

This was sort of the Original Austin Powers.

@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for saying this. And its a million times better than any modern Bond.

MMMMWWAAAH theeeee caaard game, known for it's excellence, there's card game out there called po mah soon.

@MacJaxonManOfAction

6 жыл бұрын

Inshpired by that same card game excelleeeeence...

@tomace7924

2 жыл бұрын

Ahhhhhhh…the Frensch!!!!

Damn, he was this close to having his budget for his next movie.

@mattaus

2 жыл бұрын

There are always Russian financiers he could approach.

The ultimate way for 007 to defeat Le Chiffre in that movie was just to order some French champagne

@danielbennett9132

2 жыл бұрын

Literally the best set of commercial outtakes lol

@olivercuenca4109

2 жыл бұрын

@Utubecan Eatshit But there is a California sparkling wine...

@paddle_shift

2 жыл бұрын

You mean French fries!

The look on his face when he lost

Orson Welles as a legitimate Bond villain would have been the greatest casting in a Bond movie ever.

The game is _Chemin de Fer_ ("Railroad"), a variant of Baccarat that uses a "shoe" (card dispenser) filled with 6 decks rather than 8. Between 8 to 12 players can play (2 players and 6 to 10 bettors). One player is the _banque_ ("Bank"; the player with the "shoe", or dealer) and the other is the _ponte_ ("clutch [of eggs]" or "spratling"; the player), who plays against the banker. The _croupier_ ("caller") represents the House; he passes out the cards from the dealer, calls out their value when they are revealed, and declares the winner. The other players can bet on or against either player. (Technically the player and the bettors are collectively called the _pontes_ , but the croupier uses the word _ponte_ when calling play to mean the player playing opposite the _banque_ .) The pip cards (2 through 9 of a suit) are worth face value (2 through 9 points) and the Ace (because it has only 1 pip) is worth 1 point. The 10, Jack, Queen and King are worth 10 points; since values higher than 9 are subtracted from 10, they are all worth 0 (10-10 = 0). Jokers are worthless and are removed before play. Two cards each are drawn for the _ponte_ and the _banque_ and presented by the _croupier_ with a long paddle called a _pallet_ . Each player has a chance to draw a third card if they so wish, with the _ponte_ drawing first or standing and the _banque_ having the option of standing or drawing. The objective is to have the highest sum of cards from 1 to 9. The automatic winning hand is either a sum of 8 ( _huit_ [French > "eight"], AKA _La Petite_ [French > "the Small"], the second highest possible sum) or 9 ( _neuf_ [French > "nine"], AKA _Le Grande_ [French > "the Large"], the highest possible sum). A sum higher than 9 has two digits and is worth the ones column in its sum (example: 2+3+7 = 12; 12 -10 = 2). _Baccarat_ (Italian = _baccara_ > "table or altar of Bacchus"), a sum of 0 or 10, is the worst hand. _Égalité_ ("Equality", or "tie") is when the two players have a tie result. If a bettor chose that result, it pays out 8 to 1. Otherwise everyone's bets stay where they are and a new hand is played. _Banco_ is when one or more of the bettors cries Banco before the hands are revealed, meaning they are _going all in_ (betting their entire stake against the _banque's_ hand). If there is more than one bettor calling Banco, then the bettor closest counter-clockwise to the _banque_ is called the _Banco Primo_ . If the Banco or Banco Primo succeeds and beats the _banque_ , then the shoe is passed to them and they become the new _banque_ . If the bet fails, the bettors lose their stake and have to leave the table.

@MrX-tx9lo

2 жыл бұрын

Huh?

@Puzzoozoo

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the clarification, I'll know what to look for next time I see something like this in a film.

@vinvass2674

2 жыл бұрын

Read the book, Fleming describes it there in detail People think Bond plays Poker, as in the Craig version of this, he plays Baccarat Roger Moore does play this, makes a reference to an "unfriendly shoe" to his losing opponent Rogers version of Bond was great at one up man ship , POTTER would be proud

@TT_1221

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for that, interesting to know as we often see this game played in movies..

@algi1

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you.

This is probably the only scene that closely resembles the tone of a serious James Bond movie.

Most people ask why there aren't numbers on the cards. It's because 5 out of 3 people are bad at math.

@iambic-kilometer

2 жыл бұрын

173% of all persons mishandle statistics.

@scottbernard8824

2 жыл бұрын

I'm glad I'm in the other 52%

@DanStrayer

2 жыл бұрын

I know a Ken Dodd joke when I see one, mister! 😆

@tommymiddlefinger1283

2 жыл бұрын

@@scottbernard8824 The third one, right? I agree!

@krooner

2 жыл бұрын

I can count to potato

70 years and they still try to make baccarat look like a game of skill.

@JonatasAdoM

2 жыл бұрын

Welcome to Casinos inc.

@yeetwchybaban

2 жыл бұрын

lol

@visionist7

2 жыл бұрын

I guess the only "skill" is an almost psychotic disregard for the consequences of losing

"Mrs. Pells fish sticks were always celibrated for their excellence."

Filmed 1966. Peter Sellers and Orson Welles hated each other so much that the filming of the scene where both of them face each other across a gaming table actually took place on different days with a double standing in for the other actor. However it was Sellers who first suggested Welles for the role

Le Chiffre be like, ''you wish you had swag like Connery''

Sellers wouldn't act with Welles in the filming of this scene, so they were filmed separately. This pleased Welles no end, since he'd become sick of Sellers' behaviour on the set.

@vinvass2674

2 жыл бұрын

If they had done the torture scene the way it was written in the book might have turned out different

@TechnologicallyTechnical

2 жыл бұрын

"Excellent! Now that damn Sellers can't get his hands on my Mrs. Pell's Fishsticks! Mm, they're even better raw!"

@javierpolo8762

2 жыл бұрын

what was the problem with him? im very interested!

@scottyblog

2 жыл бұрын

A pissing match.

@mdd1963

2 жыл бұрын

00:34 that would have proved a difficult task, especially given them both visible in the shot seated at the table at this particular point....

"I'm sorry, that last hand almost killed me"

Bond: What about one for the road? Le Chiffre: Mmmhhhammahahammm the F-french champagne....

Ursula Andress was stunning as always.

Actresses in the 60s much better looking than today!

@HeartyArtie

5 жыл бұрын

You like actresses in their 60s?

@trampstamp4548

5 жыл бұрын

@@HeartyArtie got em

@ajduong

4 жыл бұрын

Buddy, how can you say that when Eva Green was in the remake?

@memyselfandi2506

4 жыл бұрын

Nah, hot women r just hot women. Doesn’t matter which decade

@rayman17578

4 жыл бұрын

Ok boomer

I like this small version of Bond the fact that this is a man trying to pretend to be confident and tough but is a normal person underneath it makes it kind of heroic

Best Le Chiffre though. Orson Welles as a Bond villain is incredible.

Welles and Peter Lorre were two excellent choices for lechiffre.

@jamesrawlins735

2 жыл бұрын

Too bad Sellers and Welles hated each other so much they refused to film at the same time

*Play* The first hand ( 00:01- 00:28 ) had Evelyn Tremble stand at 5 (3+2) and LeChiffre hit on 5 (3+2) and drew a 2 for a total of 7 (3+2+2). Tremble loses 5 to 7. The next hand ( 01:05 - 01:52 ) had Evelyn Tremble stand and bluff on 5 (3+2), unnerving LeChiffre into hitting on 5 (3+2) and drawing a 5 for a total of 10 (3+2+5 = 10; 10 - 10 = 0), scoring _Baccarat_ . Tremble wins 5 to 0.

@OversikerSTUDIO

2 жыл бұрын

I wish I could understand it, what is the best way to learn it?

@Yazolight

2 жыл бұрын

You’re awesome, thanks. What is the trebulet thing they talk about?

@Inukshuk67

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you.

@SidneyBroadshead

2 жыл бұрын

@@Yazolight Treble is the UK English spelling and pronunciation for triple. Evelyn Tremble is proposing betting three times the original stakes.

@Sigma0283

2 жыл бұрын

If you look closely, Evelyn's hand changes twice, the total (5) stays the same but the suits change. He starts with the 3 of hearts and the 2 of clubs (when he looks at his hand) and when he reveals his cards it's now the 2 of hearts and three of clubs. The same thing happens again the second time around also.

Probably the best scene in the entire film. The rest is just tomfoolery all around. They should have made it a serious adaptation of the novel.

@GetToDaChoppa-k5r

4 жыл бұрын

exactly, imagine having the rights to a 007 movie and you squander it for a terrible comedy.

@houstonhelicoptertours1006

3 жыл бұрын

Cry harder.

@marxmith

3 жыл бұрын

I was about to say, I’ve always heard that this movie was terrible, but this scene looks good.

@marxmith

3 жыл бұрын

@Mark Guerrero that would require reading

@michaelschramm1064

2 жыл бұрын

@Mark Guerrero That would have meant a serious “Moonraker” at least…but then again a potentially weak and comedic “Goldfinger” and OHMSS.

welles should have been a villain in one of the official franchise's movies

Orson Welles as the best Bond villain that never was versus Peter Sellers as the best James Bond that never was. This film is nuts and the talent of its cast really gets lost in the train wreck it became.

If only this was an official adaptation... Sellers would have made a great Bond, and Welles was born to play a Bond villian

@jonisafreak3

2 жыл бұрын

His acting wouldve made a good bond but his physical presence just doesnt cut it. I cant picture sellers as suave or handsome and physically hes quite small and skinny.

@sanekabc

2 жыл бұрын

@@jonisafreak3 Correct you are!

@jojohehe3251

2 жыл бұрын

Sellers would have made a great Q, but not Bond.

@asterix7842

2 жыл бұрын

According to imdb, “Some biographies of Peter Sellers suggest that he took the role of Bond to heart and was annoyed at the decision to make the film a comedy, as he wanted to play Bond straight. This is illustrated in somewhat fictionalised form in The Life and Death of Peter Sellers (2004), based on the biography by Roger Lewis, who has claimed that Sellers kept rewriting and improvising scenes himself to make them play seriously. This story is in agreement with the observation that the only parts of the film close to the book are the ones featuring Sellers and Orson Welles.”

Fun fact. Peter Sellers and Orson Welles did not like each other and refused to act together for this scene.

@jacobadams5924

3 жыл бұрын

What movie magic did they use to get the shot at 0:50?

@pawelpap9

3 жыл бұрын

@@jacobadams5924 A set of mirrors. Each was actually in his own hotel few blocks away. It was before digital effects.

@mikekujawagvsu

2 жыл бұрын

Fun Fact: This fact was not fun.

@SuperKeswick

2 жыл бұрын

Very true and Sellers was often late on set in true diva style of course this don’t faze Welles who had done and seen it all and just said “ well where is my thin friend today ? “

@lapelcelery42

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikekujawagvsu Fact

The advantage of _Chemin de Fer_ type Baccarat for a casino is that the House only arbitrates; the _banque_ makes good all bets. The _banque_ and the players ("punters"; [French > _pontes_ ], [Spanish / Italian > _puntos_ ]) also have to pay a small fee (the _cagnotte_ , or "jackpot") to the House. This is either an agreed upon sum in advance (the "buy in" fee) or a fixed small percentage of each winning hand. Sums are drawn from it to round up the pot. When play ends for the evening, the remainder is claimed by the casino as their fee. When the _banque_ retires or cannot cover any more bets, the shoe is passed counter-clockwise to the next player, who then becomes the new _banque_ .

My favourite thing about this is the auto-generated subtitles. They're hilarious.

@Fitchy-ke3wz

2 жыл бұрын

The bank now stands at 50 million friends

@miked1869

2 жыл бұрын

@@Fitchy-ke3wz there are also some spurious references to elephants. But my favourite is when "Goodbye, Mr Le Chiffre" becomes "Goodbye, my little sheep".

I’ve never seen cards without actual numbers on lol

@williamroberts5716

2 жыл бұрын

Corner indices were introduced around 1864 so these cards seem to be pre US Civil War cowboy gambling cards without a printed pattern on the back. Maybe it's a house deck thing for nostalgia.

@SidneyBroadshead

2 жыл бұрын

It's definitely a "French" deck because of the style of pips (which would make sense for Monte Carlo). Unlike the usual Bond card game, we don't see the high pip cards like the 8, 9 or 10 or the Face Cards (Jack, Queen and King).

@Fooq

2 жыл бұрын

There's some in this clip.

I noticed Evelyns hand changed suits twice. He had a 3 of hearts and a two of clubs at the start and when he revealed his hand there was a switch where he had a 2 of hearts and a 3 of clubs. He got the exact same hand again and the same switch.

Sellers hated Welles so much that this scene was shot without the two of them being on set at the same time!

@ninja51ify

4 жыл бұрын

And he got him the job, in the movie for wells

@MrDash03

3 жыл бұрын

I heard he hated Welles because he got humiliated by him when a royal family member who was a friend of Sellers ran right to Welles instead of him.

@richardsiciliano7117

2 жыл бұрын

Welles was the kind of Alpha male that most men just didn't like. He was a force of nature.

@tomkent4656

2 жыл бұрын

@@richardsiciliano7117 I don't know about Alpha male. Welles was a narcissitic egomaniac who didn't really like people.

@kingboagart899

2 жыл бұрын

@@tomkent4656 hmm, shoulda gone into politics!

“Arblus, look! It’s Unicron!”

This movie was evidence that you can hire the biggest names in Hollywood, spend a lot of money, and still turn out a stinker.

@johnspence8141

2 жыл бұрын

Bond films have been following that formula forever. And still make money

@TheGary108

2 жыл бұрын

Bigger proof? Star Wars. All the names in the world couldn’t save the sequels.

@johnspence8141

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheGary108 yes they sucked, still made money though

@acerjuglans383

2 жыл бұрын

...Ishtar....

@paulmoore7064

2 жыл бұрын

@Bobbie Charles They say that the giraffe was designed by a committee.(Speaking of which, how many words have THREE double letters?)

There was, still is and will always be only one REAL James Bond...Sean Connery!!! R.I.P.

Peter sellers vs Orson Wells in James bond?? Awesome!

The greatest Bond. Without a doubt.

Man, Citizen Kane looks very different from what I remember.

I just noticed in the top-right corner this film is described as a comedy. Comedy. Did you notice the jokes?

@bfish89ryuhayabusa

2 жыл бұрын

Apparently, Sellers was upset that this movie was being made as a parody, and ad-libbed to make his scenes serious instead.

Yes😅 he certainly does look like Jonathan, I thought that years ago. I know orson gets belittled at times, but he could be an incredible actor, and fantastic director.

It’s really crazy how a comedy parody movie like this one inspired one of the greatest Bond movies!

@jokester3076

2 жыл бұрын

Casino royale is the first Ian Fleming novel, both films were adapted from it.

@mr.fahrenheit3460

2 жыл бұрын

@@jokester3076 interesting, thank you! big bond fan? What’s your top 3 bond movies?

Peter sellers as James Bond ... classic.

Orson Welles as Le Chiffre? "AaaAAAaaahhh, the Frenshhh champagne..."

“Ahhh!..The French Champagne..”

Damn, Orson Welles and Jonathan Frakes look so similar.

The best Bond villain not in a Bond film

call me naive but I saw this movie when I was 8 years old! and I loved it!!!!!

@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463

2 жыл бұрын

8 years old yes, and now now 45 and still loving it

I find it utterly fascinating, and depressing also, that this classic film is still derided. For me this is an iconic expression of the 60s, and a quintessential part of the classic James Bond era. I will probably watch this film once every 3 years for the next 50 years. On the other hand, I will never watch another Craig Bond ever again.

I wish that this version of baccarat, chemin de fer, was in the American casinos.

@Hitithardify

3 жыл бұрын

I was unaware there was a difference. What’s different here compared to the US? I’m more of a poker player so I wouldn’t know.

@fivebearrugs

3 жыл бұрын

Connor Burnett In the American casinos, you just bet on who you think is going to win: house, player, or push. It’s very fast, and i usually see Asians playing it. There’s no fancy croupier passing a shoe or flipping over cards with a paddle.

@Hitithardify

3 жыл бұрын

@@fivebearrugs Thats a shame, Id totally play Baccarat more if there was more to it here in the US

@fivebearrugs

3 жыл бұрын

Connor Burnett So the version of baccarat that’s in American casinos is called punto banco. There’s a couple of comparison videos between the two here on KZread. I have to remember though: when playing chemin de fer in a casino, or any game, there’s no time for idle chit chat with the other players a la Bond and the villain 😂

@fivebearrugs

3 жыл бұрын

Connor Burnett So the baccarat in the Bond films and European casinos is chemin de fer. American casinos have the punto banco variation. There are videos here on KZread that explain the two.

If you ever wondered what would happen if a bunch of hippies made a James Bond movie, then watch this film.

@commandingjudgedredd1841

2 жыл бұрын

It certainly messed with my mind, and I didn't even take a hit from a bong.

@madorsey077

2 жыл бұрын

@@commandingjudgedredd1841 get ready for more of the same after Daniel Craig

@TheGreatIAMWHOIAM

2 жыл бұрын

@@madorsey077 I'm more of a Steele Bond guy, Daniel Craig did not fit the bill of classic "Bond".

Gracias.

Can we see No Time To Die? No, we have James Bond at home …

Peter Sellers would have made a great James Bond. Enigmatic and with a dark side

Person Wells, LOL!!! Jackie Gleason must have been on holiday. >_

Now if he just breaks into a champagne commercial

Orson was known to break wind loudly and copiously, often sickening fellow actors/crew

@RadagonTheRed

6 жыл бұрын

billthestinker That is disgusting.

@ZoSo1973

6 жыл бұрын

The Beast Pretty hilarious

@Mentalsamurai28

3 жыл бұрын

He looks like his farts stink

@faerieSAALE

3 жыл бұрын

There will be NO gaseous emissions before their time! Ffferrrrrrraaaaaacccccck!

@kingboagart899

2 жыл бұрын

I heard that he would laugh uproariously about it as soon as the aroma (or stench, if you will) hit the first nostril in the area too. What a card!

Still better than Diamonds are Forever

Le Chiffre at the end: When your throat suddenly becomes as dry as it's ever been in your life.

"Mwaaaah, you must try the champagne Mr. Bond! French champagne has always been celebrated for its excellence. There is a California champagne by Paul Masson, inspired by that same French excellence. It's fermented in the bottle, and like the best French champagnes, it's vintage-dated, so Paul Masson's superb...”

@visionist7

2 жыл бұрын

Imagine buying a 50 year old vintage champagne just to spray over a bunch of naked party girls and not drink any yourself

Put subtitles on. I enjoyed it

Great scene.

Man, Daniel Craig looks different

@KRS2000

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah. Mads Mikkelsen looks older and a bit on the overweight side too.

Heard Orson Welles couldn't stand Woody Allen, having worked with him on this film.

Liked the style of the cards

I didn’t even know this existed!

Sellers actually pulls off the scene. A better actor than I had thought.

@rickhobson3211

2 жыл бұрын

Oh man. Watch "Being There."

@brendansheehy8124

2 жыл бұрын

Eh he’s ok. A faithful adaptation of Casino Royale with Sean Connery would have been awesome though. It’s a pity there was so much legal trouble over adapting the book in the main series.

@brianmiller5750

2 жыл бұрын

@@rickhobson3211 Dude, that movie is awesome

@nhmooytis7058

Жыл бұрын

Are you joking? Sellers was an amazing actor! Three roles in Strangelove!

It's because of the many production issues that made this whacky film such fun to watch - !

The one and only true "Casino Royale"!!!

@prof.sirjeffreydarling-mil3463

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, the remake was rubbish and had only one good scene (dialogue with Eva Green on the train). After that the dialogue, when there was any, was bereft of style.

waving someone off and casually saying "credit my account will you" is such a 60's move. Can you imagine a rapper or celerity going into the strip club and saying "reddit my account will you" ?

In 1967 50,000,000 French New Francs was equal to roughly $10,218,165 US Dollars.

Look at all these chic's!!!

This is the first time I ever hears about this movie, I’ve only ever heard of “Casino” from 1995 with Joe Pesci…

Fastest credit check I’ve seen in my life.

Lol, I thought that was Commander Riker from the thumbnail!

Goodbye Mr Bond, now I shall take over the world, as I do every night. Pinky, fire the doomsday laser!

"aaaaHHHHH, the FRENCH."

Those honeys around them look extra thirsty. Lol.

Why there aren't any numbers on the cards?

James Bond or James from Shipping 🚢 LOL 😂

If I can “come back” I’d come back as that diamond 😉

2 fine Creators ...Peter & Orson ...🎭🎪🎡

Lots of beautiful ladies around the table.

JAJAJA BRAVOOOO !!!