That is totally true and incredibly sad... I can only imagine the horrifying book she writes... I hope no one buys anything she is a part of!

Sad that outrage over a dead child is called embarassing.The jury system is one of the oldest traditions in America. The jurors did their job, but the lawyers did not. If there is reasonable doubt then it is not right to convict. Casey is GUILTY and the forgotten is her child. Confusing evidence and poor witnesses/experts are also to blame. Casey may be out of jail, but is definitely not free. There is nowhere she can hide from the scrutiny of the people...

I am outraged at the members of the jury. They only spent 10 hours deliberating. UNBELIEVEABLE.

Leave the jurors alone. Whats done is done. GET OVER IT!

@0MirrorGirl The fact that a case is circumstantial does not mean that it is weak. It simply means that jurors must weigh the evidence and take the second step of reaching an independent conclusion. Circumstantial evidence is nothing more than what we live by on a daily basis as a matter of common sense. ie; cookie is missing from the cookie jar.. only you and your child were in the house that day and you didn't eat the cookie... common sense.

look at her face.... shes so guilty

wish i was on the jury, she would most definatley be sitting on death row!

There are now Caey Anthony Halloween masks! Seriosly! It was on one of the national (USA) news channels today.

Well all I know is that a little girl is dead and there is no justice and that the worse part is that the only suspects are her family. All signs point to a family member and now it's just a matter of who was with her when she died. I don't care how and when. I kinda wanna know why but I don't care if I don't. But there is a who and I don't care if it's for only 20 years someone deserves to go to jail for the death of this little girl who didn't get to see the wonders of life.

You can see the next night's interviews now at the On The Record site. The foreman is very clear about why they could not convict on the evidence. Very interesting.

I agree, it's worse for an innocent person to be convicted. My uncle was scammed by people who wanted money. He tried to help someone and got framed, an spent 5 years in jail. I know that if Casey Anthony is guilty, karma will get her eventually.

The law is so fucked up people get more time in jail for selling boot leg cd's then for killing ur child wtf

I’m with you Jim!

Wow, again gotta say I agree with this. I have said all along I believe she is guilty, but I don't know she is guilty. If the evidence given doesn't prove she is guilty you can't give her a guilty sentence. Everyone is arguing completely on emotion and not straight evidence.

I THINK SHE DID IT BUT THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT,,,,DUE PROCESS

Who parties knowing her child is dead in the woods...A killer would

@dbritton41 Yes, that was definitely strange. Apparently the lawyer forgot the concept of "irresponsibility" as in, "Just because I don't think she's a murderer doesn''t mean I consider her responsible." When one comes down to it, there are few people one should or would trust with one's children, and it's not because the rest are criminals! I would certain agree that having grave doubts about this young woman's level of responsibility is appropriate! I'm done. Over and out.

rea·son·a·ble/ˈrēz(ə)nəbəl/ Adjective: (of a person) Having sound judgment; fair and sensible. Based on good sense: Their verdict may be "fair" for Casey but it wasn't for Caylee & it certainaly wasn't sensible! They "did their job" as did the prosecution.I feel bad for the prosecution when I see people say they didn't do their job & the jurors did. The prosecution DID do their job.What did the jurors want in order for them to convict? Pictures of Casey murdering Caylee?

@Hhaze

7 жыл бұрын

Yup. But then Baez would claim it was George in a wig and a dress and the jury would believe, once again, that they had no choice but to acquit.

Thank you, Celebiam, for putting this show up (don't have TV). I was glad to hear in more detail how the jury reached its verdict. I am not a part of the "lynch mob" but one of the few who thinks the jury did the only thing they could do. I also do not think Casey is "innocent" but neither can I say that she definitely committed a murder, nor that any murder was committed at all. It would be nice if we could go back in time and change events re the discover of the body, but we can't. Thanks.

They delicated there lives to set a murdered free

@0MirrorGirl thank you, i saw all three nights of this jurors interview. it was a weak point about the cookie jar.. however, it was to prove a point about "common sense" i am not an idiot.

@clubinsky33 You're right, and people seem to think that emotion is enough and that the jury should have convicted, even without facts to back up the decision. Thank you for being another voice of reason in this--there aren't many of us! The jury foreman said he was "stunned" when the prosecution rested, that he assumed that at some point some one would prove something! The pros. seemed to be hoping that CA's bad behavior would be enough to convict her, but the jury were smart, wanted facts.

@Hhaze

7 жыл бұрын

The jury ruled on emotion. Russ Heukler stated that Casey "seemed like a good mother, so they couldn't think of one reason why she killed her child" then ignored all of the evidence that Caylee's body was in the trunk of Casey's car. Jennifer Ford stated that she ruled that way because of the death penalty. The foreman stated what affected his decision was that he was good at reading body language and Casey's seemed sincere. He more or less convicted George on the same principle. He got a bad vibe and he thought George lied about having an affair. But Casey's lies meant nothing to him. Do you really want to call these people smart?

I do not get all these experts, really I try hard...you are like the lawyers...just like them......people then lets find who did this to caley,,,,who will be made responsible...who will seek the responsible one....stop talking about casey, baez, jurors !!!! like one of the guests said ok now if your baby has an accident and you want to be rich is your opportunity hide his or her body for six months then no one will know what happened....casey has become a real role modelo!!

What are the difference in Scott Petterson and Casey?

Blame the cops and the DA. Should have been a slam dunk but they some how ROYALY bricked it. I think som'n is going on w/ the dad + casey IMO.

@HotTnGirl69 As of this moment per Wikipedia, 4 lawmakers in 4 states(not 18) have begun to draft bills of some sort based on this petition. As I said, that is the 1st step in a long, long process that may never even pass a vote. Such a law would have to be constitutional, enforceable, and very carefully defined. What happens next depends on the state, but it's a slow process with no certain result. Some states require voter referenda, for example. Nothing will happen quickly or for sure.

@0MirrorGirl i said only you and your child were in the house that day. that meant there was no one else in the house that day.. i'm sorry i thought that you would understand that by me saying "only you and your child were in the house that day" yeah, i didn't ask you to speculate that anyone else came in to the house.. it's not your job to speculate if anyone else came in to the house.. that was not testified. i'm the witness.. there was no one else in the house that day.

@chungiemunchin The jurors were l a z y... they will get whats coming for letting a baby killer go free.

Cindy had been a RN for years , nurses have a lot of meds at home from 25 yrs ago , she might very well had cloraphorm in her house with the tape , but I think in my heart the baby was given either alcohol or Xanax to sleep and left in the trunk , I believe it was accidental death but you don't give a child either so that makes it murder in my parental book , I used to have respect for Mason but not anymore, he says bad stuff about the public it takes all or any class he may have had away , time will tell with Casey , if she ever gets comfortable in life again she will screw up again like OJ .

@0MirrorGirl btw it was funny.. lawyer for casey anthony was just interviewed and asked.. "would you let casey anthony baby sit your children" LOOL that lawyer avoided that question like the PLAGUE.. she answered "well, my kids are grown" interviewer said " well, how about your grand kids" lawyer said " uh uh well, the casey i grew to know during the trial was very sweet" ..... HMMM.. not even her own lawyer would trust her with kids.

@HotTnGirl69 A mistrial is something that the judge decides DURING a trial, because of some sort of error, or misconduct, or prejudicial testimony that taints the process. There's no mechanism for a post-trial finding of a so-called "mistrial." There are 3 ways for a trial to end: dismisal, verdict, mistrial. This one ended in a verdict, the key word being "ended." By now I should think it is obvious that I am anything but ignorant of the law. Think about why that might be.

@0MirrorGirl really? this guy kept saying june 15th.. he couldn't even keep his days correct. if i'm not mistaken caylee was last seen on june 16th.. also, since when was george anthony on trial? there was NEVER any evidence that george was involved criminally in this case. this juror speculated however that he was involved. he in one part of the interview said he never believed that caylee was in the trunk of the car.. but yet in the july 13th interview then said he did believe she was.

@JesaStar Some one is supplying her with a significant amount of income without her working weird.....

@Diana Castillo Casey better FEAR GOD

but i dont understand . some one please tell me why she isnt guilty ???? ive been watchingthis case for years ...

Hey Greta , question on your last statement ... . Since we are a debt based economy with our federal reserve notes (debts to the fed) and we have to borrow money into existence, where do we get the money to pay the spiraling debt? It can’t be paid as it destroys the fractional reserve money supply and therefore must grow and grow until the collapse inevitably occurs. You know this, all of you do, but like good new world order minions you’ll keep lying to people about it rather than telling the truth that real money , gold and silver, is the only honest money. Not selling out your country like all presstitute media minions would cost you everything though.

@MsCrazyashley123 Cared enough to post this message ... BUYA!

@0MirrorGirl - I agree completely.

@HotTnGirl69 No one has paid them a dime. All interviews have been given without any renumeration--check your facts.

@HotTnGirl69 The whole office has been fascinated by the public outcry and the assumptions about what the evidence was and was not. I have permission to be online while I'm working, as many people here are interested. It's been educational to say the least. If you think the attorneys, paralegals, and clerks working in the justice system haven't been paying attention, you're wrong. To see the public go nuts is informational and has people worried about future juries and what they'll do.

@HotTnGirl69 "All over the world"? First of all, right now it's just an idea, and a petition. Any law would have to be written, then go through the legislature, state by state, and would have no effect outside of the U.S. Educate yourself, please! I would be embarrassed to display this level of ignorance.

@HotTnGirl69 I am sitting in a criminal attorney's office right now, working. You are wrong about everything you've said. Talk to someone who understands our criminal justice system. There are many of us.

@dbritton41 And my point is that you still have to prove that, for example, there were, in fact, cookies in the cookie jar. In your example, you are relying on one person's word to explain the entire situation. That's a weak case, and a stupid example. A murder case is rarely that simple. I am done with this discussion. I merely wanted to let people know that the whole interview with the jury foreman is now up on Fox News On the Record--all three nights.

@HotTnGirl69 No one is "bringing it into effect." A law takes years to be written and put through the legislature, and it has to be enforceable and sensible. This law is neither, by the way. Right now it's just an idea, there's a petition. That's all there is. And you wrote "all over the world." You're not writing much that is rational.

@kathen111 Are you the KZread police? I'm exercising my 1st Amendment right.

NOT GUILTY!!!! WOOO HOOO!!!

@HotTnGirl69 Again, you are speaking in almost complete ignorance. The only ones who could sue her, who have any legal standing in this matter, are her parents. As they know Casey hasn't a dime and helped in her defense, it would be pretty much impossible for them to get a lawyer to represent them, let alone win a lawsuit. And once the trial is over, there is no way to declare a mistrial! You have no knowledge of the law, and clearly have no respect for it. A jury must have both, thankfully.

@clubinsky33 And they can't seem to distinguish between what the press says and what was presented in court. For example, news readers keep saying "the duct tape was wrapped around her skull." This is not a true statement! But they keep repeating it, and people seem to believe it even when the jurors state that this is not where the tape was, & that the skull fell out of the bag at the scene, etc. It's scary how little the facts matter to these people. Hysteria is more fun, I guess.

Get over it!!!!

@geodroyal Well why did you drive on you suspended licence

@HotTnGirl69 It is over. Let it go. You can't do anything about any of it, so why keep on ranting and raving? Do you all imagine they're going to start all over just because some people cannot respect the jury's decision? There are plenty of other, more fruitful ways of using your energy.

@dbritton41 Well, then, let's just throw out the whole legal process and move straight to your system, where your word, in this case, is all that matters. Let's not ask anyone else if they went into the home without your knowledge, or if anyone saw anyone else in your home. In fact, let's not even bother to establish that there were, in fact, cookies in the cookie jar. Let's just take the word of one person and go straight to conviction. Good plan.

@Hhaze

7 жыл бұрын

It needs to be established that there were, in fact, cookies in the cookie jar? What's your point? That Caylee never existed, that she was a collective figment of the public's imagination? Hmm...What you also seem to be saying is that it's possible that someone else came in the house and stole the cookies who you aren't sure were in the cookie jar in the first place. So are you saying "let's ignore the person on trial, can't speculate about them with all the evidence against them that was presented, but it's fine to speculate that someone else stole the cookies with no evidence." Yup, that's how our legal system should work. Let's put everyone else but the person on trial on trial and if worst comes to worst and things look bad for the defendant who had cookie crumbs all over the trunk of her car and a faded wrapper crumpled up beside them, let's just pretend there's no evidence that the crime existed in the first place. " Idiotic circular reasoning.

@jimmyjohn074 RIParadise Caylee.. no joke should be made at Caylees expense

@pinusstrikesback so much evidence was there that THAT COMMENT is stupid funny

@HotTnGirl69 You could be using the information I've been providing you as an opportunity to learn something about our legal system, instead of spitting nails because I am contradicting your incorrect statements. If one good thing comes out of this, it could be an education for those who aren't familiar with the differences between a courtroom and a newsroom, for example. I've actually given you a great deal of good info, and it hasn't cost you a penny, just some thought. That's not a bad deal.

@HotTnGirl69 Any organization who pays for an interview must say they have done so. All have denied paying anyone anything. Lots of people do interviews for free! Movie stars doing promos don't get paid, for example. Arguing with you is absurd and I'm done. You are so full of misinformation it is sad. You can find out the facts of any of what you're talking about with a simple Google search--try it.

These speakers suck