Great review with some amazing real world images. I was thinking about getting this or the 28 70 f2, but since i only shoot candids of my children, i went with the 50mm 1.2 instead

These are the types of videos I need, thank you so much! I think that I'd only get this lens if I had to cover events, and would be perfect for the "backpack journalist." My go-to lenses right now (that I own) are the 28-70 and the 70-200, but I have to use the ring adapter since that one is for an older camera. I love it so much though!

That noticeable chromatic abberation though on the longer-end shots

Hi Tim, what Cannon low light lens would work with a ZWO ASI 178 MM planetary camera? Must have an image stabilizer. Used below 10,000' airspace only.

@Digi20

2 ай бұрын

all RF lenses have fully electronic control, you can only use them on RF compatible cameras, otherwise there would be no IS, no aperture control and above all no possibility to move the focus cause the focus ring has no direct connection and only works by wire. so no, you cant use them on a planetary camera. however you can use most older EF lenses with an adapter and pull focus by hand, but no aperture control and no IS.

@williamkacensky4796

2 ай бұрын

@@Digi20 Thank you.

Yes, Tamron makes a 35-150mm f/2-2.8 too for Canon Sony and Nikon.

@alexmaccape8411

3 ай бұрын

Tamron makes nice lenses, however 35-150 is not comparable with 24-105mm. Focal lengths are totally different, especially in the wide end the difference is huge.

@jamesjackson4264

3 ай бұрын

They don’t make it for canon.

@captainlooney4356

3 ай бұрын

@@jamesjackson4264 you’re right, it’s been on the rumor mill and the Nikon Z version was only recently released (higher price tag than Sony E). Maybe Canon RF mount will follow suit soon.

@jamesjackson4264

3 ай бұрын

@@captainlooney4356 to bad canon is playing hard ball.