Canon RF 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-500, Compared

Ойын-сауық

I have owned the Canon RF 100-500 F/4.5-7.1L lens for two years, and I absolutely love it. So, why did I buy the RF 100-400 F/5.6-8? It's shorter, slower, and not an L-class lens. What's it good for? Will it stay in my bag? I took both lenses out for a little bird photography to compare them. Watch and see the results!
Be sure to check my equipment list and affiliate links. If you log onto Amazon using my links and make a qualifying purchase, I get a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thanks for your support!
My kit:
Canon R5: amzn.to/3EAZWRy
Canon R6: amzn.to/3xQPa5H
Canon RF 16mm F/2.8: amzn.to/3xQPa5H
Canon RF 14-35 F/4L: amzn.to/3Sr61p8
Canon RF 24-105mm F/4L: amzn.to/3SpqURP
Canon RF 35mm F/1.8: amzn.to/3m81RX9
Canon RF 100mm F/2.8L Macro: amzn.to/3knTpmc
Canon RF 100-500mm F/4.5-7.1L: amzn.to/3Z10h8j
FLM CP30-L4 II tripod
RRS BH-40 ball head: amzn.to/3YVk88K
Induro CLT203 tripod: amzn.to/3IRAQAl
Manfrotto XPRO ball head
NiSi V5 filter holder & circular polarizer
NiSi 100mm 3-stop, 6-stop, and 10-stop ND filters
Lee 100mm 15-stop ND filter
Lee 100mm x 150mm 3-stop medium grad ND filter
GoPro Hero12: amzn.to/3XXpHlW
GoPro Media Mod
Ulanzi MT71 Vlog Handle: amzn.to/45v7M9G
Rode VideoMicro shotgun mic: amzn.to/3lSL6PF
Rode Wireless Go II mic & receiver: amzn.to/3IwWnN8
Rode Lavalier Go mic: amzn.to/3YXDdaw
Editing software:
DaVinci Resolve Studio 18 (www.blackmagicdesign.com/produ hicts/davinciresolve/)
Camtasia: www.techsmith.com/video-edito...
Music:
Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com​); KZread Studio
Vegetable Police (vegetablepolice.bandcamp.com/)
Other Social Media:
Instagram: / johndrummondphoto
X: X.com/PhotoDrummond
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/9722646...
Website: jdrummondphoto.com

Пікірлер: 19

  • @ddki9094
    @ddki90942 ай бұрын

    For the flowery image, I really liked the shot with the split between the flowers in the foreground and the reflection in the midground.

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    Thanks. That's my favorite too.

  • @withvinayak
    @withvinayak28 күн бұрын

    I think the landscape photos are just amazing given that you did not use tripod or anything but they came out really well! Kudos 🎉

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    27 күн бұрын

    Why, thank you!

  • @zephalu
    @zephalu2 ай бұрын

    Great comparison video. Even though the birds were not agreeable, you got some amazing landscape shots. We thought the doves were too close to call on sharpness.

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    Thanks for watching! Yeah, it's pretty close between them in sharpness. Pixel peeping is overrated.

  • @chosenbydesign9007
    @chosenbydesign90072 ай бұрын

    Yes!! gear head in me is loving this subject. thank you.

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    And I thank you.

  • @stefanusrheeder4162
    @stefanusrheeder41622 ай бұрын

    thanks John. Just shows.....you can enjoy the cheaper lenses just as much as the expensive ones. \I prefered the f16 flower tree water landscape pics

  • @capturingnaturewithsandip
    @capturingnaturewithsandip2 ай бұрын

    Nice video. Thanks for sharing & big like

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    Thank you!

  • @randallbrander8157
    @randallbrander8157Ай бұрын

    At my age when I bend down and lean forward I usally throw my back out if I stay in this position for awhile. Cheers!

  • @mobelue
    @mobelue2 ай бұрын

    Nice video John. Where were you?

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    Alley Pond Park & Alley Pond Environmental Center, both in Queens.

  • @freddieslaughter1107
    @freddieslaughter11072 ай бұрын

    What is the price difference? Which Canon camera do you use?

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    The 100-400 is $649. The 100-500 is $2699 (current discount at B&H). I use both the R5 and R6. The 100-500 is a little sharper, a 1/2 stop faster, obviously longer, and it's better weather sealed. But it's hard to justify that price.

  • @David_Quinn_Photography

    @David_Quinn_Photography

    2 ай бұрын

    ​@@JohnDrummondPhoto wow $700 for the 100-400 that almost nullifies the justification for the 100-500

  • @JohnDrummondPhoto

    @JohnDrummondPhoto

    2 ай бұрын

    @@David_Quinn_Photography Yes. I love the image sharpness of the 100-500. But if the 100-400 were available two years ago, I might have bought it. Except it's slow, and slower still with the extender you need to shoot birds with. It'd be a hard decision.

  • @fotoinstruct6971

    @fotoinstruct6971

    2 ай бұрын

    @@JohnDrummondPhoto The RF100-400 has become my go to lens for everything since it arrived. Unless I plan on making serious prints, or shooting in heavy rain, my "L's" will be staying home from now on. I've been waiting for over 4 months for B&H to ship my RF200-800 and now wonder if I actually need it. Note- Since the RF200-800 introduction there are real deals now for 100-500's used.

Келесі