Another missed chance of calling a big particle accelerator "Megatron".

@KafshakTashtak

3 жыл бұрын

These accelerators have energies in Tera Electron volts range. Calling them Megatron is under selling their power.

@grandsome1

3 жыл бұрын

@@KafshakTashtak Megatron^6

@qwerty_and_azerty

3 жыл бұрын

SAHM TeraTron

@acameron87

3 жыл бұрын

SAHM I’m sure they’re a million times more energetic than something, Megatron could refer to that

@thenasadude6878

3 жыл бұрын

@@KafshakTashtak Mega-Megatron? Just avoid Theranos and similar

"Oh, it's that guy. I don't know who he is, but he's always on your screen." My wife.

@sethheristal9561

3 жыл бұрын

"Ok guys we figured it out" "Yea! the first law of Jeff's preferences, finally!" "

@alberteinstein2291

3 жыл бұрын

Your wife must also be involved in learning about everything... you are everything to her

@insertoyouroemail

3 жыл бұрын

You promptly divorced her right there and then, of course.

@slickus

3 жыл бұрын

Lol almost same! :)

@Murdog36

3 жыл бұрын

😂 oh wives!

Thanks for the great quote from Robert Wilson: "except to make it worth defending"! It resonates to me as we all often take part in activities in our lives with no obvious immediate materialistic return "except to make our lives or community worth living". Great presentation as always!

"The trick is to bang the rocks together guys." - Douglas Adams... Can't say he wasn't wrong, we just need to bang the rocks together even harder.

@Scherzo-mk4ih

3 жыл бұрын

Anyone who quotes Douglas Adams is a good friend of mine

@thefirstsin

3 жыл бұрын

True👍

@JavierAlbinarrate

3 жыл бұрын

bang the rocks... mhh hey you perv! step down from that Venus statue!

@thefirstsin

3 жыл бұрын

@@JavierAlbinarrate ok I'll give you a like cause your comment is funny and *lewd* (= o =)

It's hard to sell, but negative results are also results.

@BlueCosmology

3 жыл бұрын

It depends a lot on the negative results really. The negative results for a lot of BSM that the LHC generated has been very valuable for exotics, largely because we had good reasons to believe and actually were fairly confident some of them were true. There's the huge difference with the FCC though, that we don't really have any convincing reason to believe that any BSM that we're currently searching for actually exists, just negative results for BSM with the FCC would be a huge blow to exotics, nothing useful.

@sahilbaori9052

3 жыл бұрын

Uhhhhh what?

@beardedroofer

3 жыл бұрын

Didn't Edison's lightbulb take 93 tries?

@sdfkjgh

3 жыл бұрын

@@BlueCosmology: Mebbe the reason we can't ever find BSM is because we keep neglecting to look for the D. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@nawor3565

3 жыл бұрын

@meaturama do you have a better idea? Why don't you come up with a theory of everything, then we won't have to build any more colliders?

"...which is for reference...a lot of energy" XD

@Cronos804

3 жыл бұрын

"A lot" is one of my favorite ordinals.

@05TE

3 жыл бұрын

I'd say it's at least 2 joules. Probably more.

@byronwatkins2565

3 жыл бұрын

10^-7 Joules won't exactly launch a rocket...

@MusicalRaichu

3 жыл бұрын

Tera-fying!

@jimgraham6722

3 жыл бұрын

$30bn later, what if we turn it on and find NOTHING. The Americans are right, we need to go smaller and smarter expanding knowledge at substantially lower cost. By the way I would vote for any nuclear research that led to practical accelerator driven fission power, affordable, practical fusion energy (not the ITER monster) and all this done economically and safely with little or no waste. These are truly urgent issues. If we solve them maybe an FCC in a couple of centuries.

let's stop half-assing this and just build a ring around the moon! we all know that's where this is going, why waste another penny building anything smaller?

@pettanshrimpnazunasapostle1992

3 жыл бұрын

Why stop at the moon when we could do one around the sun when we have a dyson satelite array in the future?

@thekaz2099

3 жыл бұрын

@@pettanshrimpnazunasapostle1992 we can't do a Dyson array now, we can do Moon collider today.. also we're never going to have a Dyson sphere around our sun. There isn't enough mass in all 9 planets combined to do it. We need an artificial sun, or to collapse one of the planets into a black hole and build an array around that.

@alonelyperson6031

3 жыл бұрын

@@thekaz2099 A dyson swarm is plausible with just mercury's mass tho.

@YerpyMoose

3 жыл бұрын

@@alonelyperson6031 the kurzgesagt is strong with this one

@secnytsecnyt2981

3 жыл бұрын

@@thekaz2099 who says you need to cover the whole surface area of the sun? As another user said, the mass of mercury would suffice.

Reminder: US military budget for ONE YEAR (2020) is $738 billion

@shneghabat

3 жыл бұрын

The pathetic looting of iraq syria Libya revealed that all that money went towards corruption and nothing else.

@powewq1748

3 жыл бұрын

I think this money is spent well. The evil terrorists want to kill you and your children... they must be stopped. I pray Jesus will help our troops.

@chadtheprogressivelibertar7787

3 жыл бұрын

Powewq 1 😂😂😂 there stealing more money then you could count to in 10 lifetimes!

@ASLUHLUHCE

3 жыл бұрын

@@powewq1748 Can't even tell if you're trolling lmao

@ozzymandius666

3 жыл бұрын

Lots of Greenpeace types here who would rather the US get annexed by a hostile power.

Can you do an episode on the so called “island of stability“ and other special matter configurations that may lie beyond the periodic table and standard model?

@Clefargle

3 жыл бұрын

Ascolano Irl I just meant in terms of future experiments and physics tests to probe elements past the periodic table

@Dai5tr0y3r

3 жыл бұрын

I liked for the 'Island of Stability' :)

@Gooberpatrol66

3 жыл бұрын

I would like to know if the "continent of stability" is real.

@RStell-wt5qr

3 жыл бұрын

That's sad. It's like a small child whistling in the dark because he's afraid. Are you that afraid of being incorrect? The implications are that this Universe was not created by chance. Something built this thing, is that so difficult foe you to grasp. Give it up. Something built this.

@RStell-wt5qr

3 жыл бұрын

110 people are can't accept that something built the Universe.

The FCC will definitely never be confused with the FCC.

@Ender240sxS13

3 жыл бұрын

The FCC won't let me be Let me be me so let me see Thy tryin to shut me down in the LHC....

@thenasadude6878

3 жыл бұрын

This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. The FCC cannot follow the FCC guidelines, otherwise all its experiments will be useless

@Mandragara

3 жыл бұрын

@John McKay The idea is that understanding quantum physics better will allow us to build better machines.

@PandemoniumMeltDown

3 жыл бұрын

The Federal Censorship Commission?

@Mandragara

3 жыл бұрын

@John McKay You're right in that I'm misusing the term 'Quantum Mechanics', but my comment was aimed at the layperson who doesn't know the technical meaning. New particles can certainly change our understanding of the SM, what if we find a particle that doesn't behave as the SM would predict? What if we don't find things like SUSY? QM mechanics is well understood as you say, but the issue is that a lot of things are not really computable. Have you done any nuclear physics? QM on those scales is an absolute mess to work with. My hope is that a better understanding of particle physics will lead to models that are more easily computable. This is a bit outside my area, but I am a Physics PhD, so I know how to read paper abstracts at least :P

6:00 - _I can feel a yawn coming on_ 6:10 - _suppressed it_

@P4NCH1

3 жыл бұрын

Happens singing too ;D

Hey, when you said that "we need higher luminosity", I think we should mention the Belle II experiment in Japan. It's an electron-positron collider and it will have the highest instantaneous luminosity (thus integrated luminosity of 50 ab-1 at the end). Its goal is to find indirect evidence (compared to LHC which finds direct evidence) of new physics by searching for signatures of new particles or processes through measurements of suppressed flavor physics reactions or deviations from the standard model predictions! Bigger colliders are not always the solution :) Great video otherwise!

@angelduenas

3 жыл бұрын

Lol watch it blow up earth or sum

@piguyalamode164

3 жыл бұрын

@@angelduenas highly unlikely considering the energies of the particles involved are much much much smaller than amounts of energy we use all the time. Like, a Terra electron volt is a lot in particle physics terms, but is many orders of magnitude less than a Joule(for reference, a Killowatt-hour is 3.6 million Joules). The reason it needs to be so huge and energy intensive is that all that energy is focused into an absolutely tiny space. Even if it makes a black hole the energy involved is so small that the resulting object will be much much smaller than an electron, so it will basically do nothing(even if hawking radiation is not a thing)

@gandalf_thegrey

Жыл бұрын

I think bigger accelerators are the solution to a different answer.

Matt's either rocking the covid hair, or is going to grow it out in order to fully assume the mantle of space jesus.

@thetobi583

3 жыл бұрын

My vote is on space jesus lol

@DavidKennyNZL

3 жыл бұрын

As they are filming in deep space his hair proves we have artificial gravity.

@whitenoise1119

3 жыл бұрын

we have gun jesus on ForgottenWeapons and space jesus here

@Jossandoval

3 жыл бұрын

Covid hair? At this point is more like corvid hair.

@fomalhaut_the_great

3 жыл бұрын

either way, i love it

*Came here for the future colliders* *Stayed for the omlettes*

@inamdarsaquib9528

3 жыл бұрын

Divided by theories United by OeMelEtT

Shout out to Sabine Hossenfelder: Maybe we should spend more time working with cosmic rays.

@evilhenny

3 жыл бұрын

Yo, study Gaia;... Dry your clothes on a drying rack made of slightly different material for 37 years.

@davidhand9721

3 жыл бұрын

I was just thinking about that. We already have an apparatus to direct high energy particles toward the poles (the Earth's magnetic field) so how much more would it take to focus them onto a target, or divert two beams and smash them together?

@ludaheracles7201

3 жыл бұрын

I used to work with a guy called cosmic ray

@thenewtalkerguy496

3 жыл бұрын

Even bigger shout out to skimpine pantyhoser.

@zadokallen1499

3 жыл бұрын

She has a point, doesn't she?

I nominate the screenshot at 0:01 to be Matt's new profile pic on all his social media accounts -- including LinkedIn and Tinder.

Imagine living in times when we have a collider around the Moon

@iainballas

3 жыл бұрын

I was literally just thinking that a massive particle accelerator around the equator of the moon could be pretty useful for alot of things.

@zsanterre

3 жыл бұрын

It's actually not the size that matters as much as the material used. They've been making anti-mater, as well as new particles, for this reason.

@Celestialeris

3 жыл бұрын

@@zsanterre true, but there's still a very important link between the size of the ring and the potential for discovery

@discomfort5760

3 жыл бұрын

@@zsanterre Particle physics rely on statistics and statistics becomes more useful when you have more data per sample. Bigger particle accelerator = more data per time sample.

@RelemZidin

3 жыл бұрын

The moon? No, we harvest the moon, venus, mercury, and various moons to build an AU sized dyson swarm and a particle accelerator. We keep the earth as a zoo. Maybe keep the moon, i was getting excited. Moons cool.

I've been a follower of physics breakthroughs since the early 60's. I hope I'll be around for the next things. Thanks, Matt. Keep 'em coming!

@OldGamerNoob

3 жыл бұрын

As many higgs as possible? would effects of inertia and gravity increase in an area where the higgs field increased like that?

@sdfkjgh

3 жыл бұрын

@@OldGamerNoob: -You wanna find out, you gotta put in a requisition form and research proposal for --www.scpwiki.com/scp-536-- with the O5 Council.- DISREGARD THIS, NO SUCH THINGS EXIST.

@teaser6089

4 ай бұрын

may you live to experience many more discoveries,

Could you do a show on anomalies that don't fit the Standard Model? The ones you mentioned here were new to me and give me the sense that there's a lot more going on than the average lay person knows about. Thanks!

"Future Circular Collider?" I do hope they can come up with a better name that won't become obsolete as soon as it's built, and stops being, "in the future."

@certaindeath7776

3 жыл бұрын

its a project name. when the project comes to construction, it will have another name^^

@BaronVonQuiply

3 жыл бұрын

I, for one, look forward to the Two Weeks Ago Circular Collider.

@badlydrawnturtle8484

3 жыл бұрын

I love books with titles like "The New Comprehensive Encyclopedia of X" (published 1987).

@fnors2

3 жыл бұрын

@@certaindeath7776 The longer something keeps a temporary name, the more likely it will not change. Watch it be called the "Future Circular Collider" with the justification that "We are doing the science of the future!" or something like that. And even if the name changes, it will likely still have the FCC acronym.

@SoulDelSol

3 жыл бұрын

@@fnors2 I'm pretty sure the future part is just in reference to the fact it isnt built yet. I'm sure they'll rename is to Present Collider. Though I'm personally fond of Smashy McSmash Smash

4:18 probably already mentioned. You labelled gluon as photon on graph. Lepton and quarks labels are reversed.

@martiddy

3 жыл бұрын

I noticed that as well

@GNParty

3 жыл бұрын

Underrated comment.

@ericgraham8150

3 жыл бұрын

Wow, how deep does this conspiracy go?

@felinehairball5936

3 жыл бұрын

Arrrrghgh! I hate it when that happens! LOL

@Rationalific

3 жыл бұрын

I just noticed those things, too. Good that this has been pointed out already, but your comment should be ranked even higher.

You know, when I was like three years old it was great fun smashing matchbox cars into each other... never would I have thought that I was actually performing what will later become the bleeding edge of science just on a different scale...

@seanoconnor4738

3 жыл бұрын

Some people are just the giants that the rest of these dorks stand on the shoulders of. Respect.

6:00 You need to teach me how to power through a yawn like that!

@rathegod5290

3 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

Somewhere in the multiverse, an alternate version of me is the owner and operator of a gay nightclub called "The Large Hardon Collider".

@odizzido

3 жыл бұрын

This is an excellent comment

@powewq1748

3 жыл бұрын

Its actually a stupid comment that isnt funny. In an alternate universe i force feed you your own excrement

@simonheaney8721

3 жыл бұрын

Don't quit your day job pal😕

@deusexaethera

3 жыл бұрын

@@powewq1748: So Sayeth The Only Objective Person On The Internet.

@lobster7799

3 жыл бұрын

Shawn Elliott Hahahahaha

run

@berserker8884

3 жыл бұрын

Man I LOVE this community

@MrMrdbarros

3 жыл бұрын

Put the money on climate related research. Gives honor AND saves us. #teamhossenfelder haha

@michaelblacktree

3 жыл бұрын

HAHA! 🤣

@aeroscience9834

3 жыл бұрын

Marcel de Barros meanwhile the US military blows 750 billion (ie 75 total FCC’s) per every year. And no one bats an eyelid.

@ulti-mantis

3 жыл бұрын

@@aeroscience9834 No one? That's weird

6:37 "No Sign Of SUSY" is the name of my SUSY & The Banshees cover band.

@terryboyer1342

3 жыл бұрын

Peekaboo!

@muskyelondragon

3 жыл бұрын

Kiss them for me

@thenasadude6878

3 жыл бұрын

Creedence Clearwater Revival is also not happy with the lack of Susy Q(uantum)

@gordalla2957

3 жыл бұрын

There's a planet in my kitchen

I get sooo excited whenever the SpaceTime intro plays!! Perhaps my favorite opening theme song/tune/melody of all [Space]time!!

Video Title: Can Future Colliders Break the Standard Model? Me: Whose future are they going to collide? Hopefully not mine...

@sadmanjahed1898

3 жыл бұрын

This comment is so flipping underrated 😂

Gluon is called photon in the SM circle. My eyes

@rwbaira

3 жыл бұрын

Leptons and quarks are also mislabeled (or miscolored)

@denischarette7972

3 жыл бұрын

@@rwbaira Also, in the representation of the muon and its magnetic field, the direction of the lines of force is supposed to be arbitrarily from north to south.

@KhalilEstell

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah this actually confused me and made me think that I didn't understand something about the standard model.

@sdfkjgh

3 жыл бұрын

@@KhalilEstell: Welcome back to feeling like the rest of us plebs.

The 'pants analogy' all comes down to all the fun stuff happening where the legs come together? You win this round, Universe.

@MusicalRaichu

3 жыл бұрын

TBH I found the way he was gesticulating a bit disconcerting ...

I love that some of our most advanced technical achievements is essentially just "smash stuff together really hard".

“Which is for reference... A lot of energy” Well thank you for that... really helped 😂

Better title: We still have no clue about physics but we're trying HARD

@gm683

3 жыл бұрын

We have more than clues, we know a lot but not everything.

@gabrielmalek7575

3 жыл бұрын

I mean basically.

It would be wrong to say that CERN and the LHC are located in Switzerland when 80+% of the infrastuctures are on French soil. The main lab was built on and across the border and If I remember correctly only the ATLAS detector is on Swiss soil.

@michaelsommers2356

3 жыл бұрын

The front gate, though, is in Switzerland.

I think leptons and quarks are inverted in the legend of the scheme of standard model at 4:51. Nice video btw.

@germanshepherddog732

3 жыл бұрын

i did notce that till now

Man i love pbs spacetime and just pbs in general. Such a great program.

Space Time has uploaded! Drop everything you're doing and watch!

They're missing a huge opportunity by not calling it the _Larger Hadron Collider._

@daveseddon5227

3 жыл бұрын

…. or the Bigger Hitty Crashy Thingy.

@fredashay

3 жыл бұрын

Or Collider McColliderface

@ThatCrazyKid0007

3 жыл бұрын

LHC then starts a particle rap career as Lil Hadron Collider

@A.Lifecraft

3 жыл бұрын

If LHC is then that other ring, the new one could be the one ring! And they could then have a watchdog at that facility and call him Frodo. You know, like stuff you do as a nerdguy at university...

@PandemoniumMeltDown

3 жыл бұрын

They could also call it the Larger Huger Coldron... but they don't, because, as all know: size doesn't matter o.O

0:00 "Making the mother of all theories here Jack, can't fret over every particle!"

Tweaking the luminosity and always seeing more Precision with the head on collisions, and the calculations of those collisions was quite impressive that I never forget that

There's a little mistake: Matt said at 9:08 that the Future Circular Collider would be 100 times the energy of the LHC, when it is 8 - the subtitles are correct, however.

@davecool42

3 жыл бұрын

Was gonna say. Sheesh. But 100x would be way better.

@MikeDCWeld

3 жыл бұрын

Who cares? He said it right the first time.

@NoxmilesDe

3 жыл бұрын

Neeeeeeeerd

@subliminalvibes

3 жыл бұрын

So you weren't listening at 0:39 when he said it the first time?

@rizkyadiyanto7922

3 жыл бұрын

@@250txc its planned for 2027.

Caveman: *Smashes rocks together, gets sharp ouchie stone* HRR! SUENCE! Modern Scientist: *smashes particles together, find new stuff* Hmmm...SCIENCE!

@darrenc8776

3 жыл бұрын

That is an acurate analogy mate. We know absolutely fxxk all

@theemissary1313

3 жыл бұрын

I will quote Adam Savage - "The only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down"

@ac.creations

3 жыл бұрын

@@theemissary1313 thats a good one.

@danielbriones2938

3 жыл бұрын

Some things never change...

@thenasadude6878

3 жыл бұрын

@@danielbriones2938 "Science. Science never changes"

"Nice". That ending gave me a good chuckle.

Nice to see BNL's RHIC getting some love in accelerator talks. 💞 @11:14

I really appreciate the perspective of being Patriotic as a Species ❤️

@RStell-wt5qr

3 жыл бұрын

Play Halo, you'll appreciate the story.

@hamstsorkxxor

3 жыл бұрын

@@RStell-wt5qr Dear humanity, we regret being alien bastards, we regret coming to Earth. And we most definitely regret the Corps. just blew up our raggedy-ass fleet!

@lexxynubbers

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I'd like to see dolphins do something like this.

@NoxmilesDe

3 жыл бұрын

Wow stupid

@250txc

3 жыл бұрын

That was total BS. Only politicians and extremists use that word. -- Humans have and always slaughter each other. Get in the real world, OK?

If you want to make an apple pie from scratch You must first invent the universe -Saint Carl Sagan (bless his name)

@muskyelondragon

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed 💘

I can't wait for the day when all this wonderful understanding can make a better mouse trap.

What an inspiration How you speak to those looking to be apart of something bigger than themselves is touching

Woah! You totally buried the lede there that I never heard before! I had no idea that the Higgs boson was so much lighter than predicted. I try to follow physics as much as a non mathematically trained lay person can, and none of the educational physics videos or articles I've come across ever mentioned that. Edit:that I recalled at least.

@Jesse__H

3 жыл бұрын

I'm surprised to hear that! I follow these kinds of subjects only casually, but the one thing I do remember about the period after we found the Higgs was how puzzled scientists were that it didn't match their predicted mass. 🤷‍♂️ so it goes I guess! There are so many sources of information it's inevitable that we'll miss something important eventually.

@NightDescendant

3 жыл бұрын

From what I heard (if I'm remembering correctly), the standard model predicted one mass for the higgs boson, supersymmetry predicts another, and they found a value that was somewhere in between the two of them.

@LeoStaley

3 жыл бұрын

@@Jesse__H I heard all about how discrepancies in measuring w and Z bosons led to it being theorized, how interacting with it is what gives massive particles their mass, how it was identified via statistics, and then talk of using the lhc to find more particles beyond the standard model, but I guess I somehow missed that. Keeps me humble I guess.

@schokoladenjunge1

3 жыл бұрын

Generally, scalar particle masses are expected to be very high unless there's a reason keeping them low. (Unlike for fermions, where the opposite is the case due to protective symmetries.) There were (high) upper bounds on the higgs mass from the masses of W and Z and then further stringent bounds from the top quark. Overall, it is pretty light. In the minimal supersymmetric extension to the standard model, it is predicted to be light, but actually has had an upper bound of around 135 GeV (see e.g. arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9709356.pdf) And while i'm not entirely well versed in SUSY, I've read that it's a bit difficult to get 125GeV. However, none of this really predicts more physics beyond the horizon as far as I'm aware. In fact, using the assumption that there's nothing more, you can *derive* the 125GeV higgs mass from asymptotic safety constraints, which are pretty conservative.

@michals1967

3 жыл бұрын

No, in fact the Higgs boson was not predicted to be heavy, because a heavy (>1 TeV) Higgs boson would not do its job. Actually, theory could not predict its mass except that it cannot be too heavy. The problem is that when you calculate quantum corrections to the Higgs mass, they diverge. It's an internal inconsistency of the Standard Modlel: the Higgs has to be light and at the same time there is no way to keep it light. Which is why we believe the Standard Model is not the ultimate theory.

I'd love to hear about Sabine's suggestion, which she mentioned on the live stream, for getting new physics sooner than the FCC: measure the force due to gravity from an object in a quantum superposition of states. That's *guaranteed* to produce new physics and could probably be done far sooner than the FCC will be completed. Shouldn't that be getting more attention, not to mention research money? (For those unfamiliar, we need to be able to put bigger things into superpositions of states and/or measure smaller things' gravitational force, but the gap we'd need to close is four or five orders of magnitude rather than (as I recall) the gap of 30 orders before we can detect gravitons. Sabine's guess as of a few years ago was that we're about 20 years away.)

@MegaManki

3 жыл бұрын

As far as I’m aware this is already being worked on. But it’s also really difficult to accomplish due to decoherence effects in macroscopic objects.

@Mosern1977

3 жыл бұрын

If someone says: 20 years away => we have no idea if it is even remotely possible. Fusion is 20 years away.

@SuperStingray

3 жыл бұрын

I think putting macroscopic systems into coherent states is going to be a big area of focus over the coming decades, because that's an extremely important problem for creating quantum computers with more complex circuits. It will be interesting to see if the technology that makes quantum computers broadly useful ends up helping us prove (or disprove) quantum gravity.

@jyrinx

3 жыл бұрын

Mosern1977 Fair, but there's actual progress being made on this, not just hopes for a breakthrough. Besides, at some point the FCC will be two decades off.

@jyrinx

3 жыл бұрын

Slartibartfass It's being worked on, but I'm surprised it's not a bigger priority. In particular, people make it sound like we might never be able to probe quantum gravity directly, when actually no, there's a credible path to get there.

I like that you yawned while talking and just pushed on through 🥱

I do love listening to Matt talk about pahticles.

Sabine hossenfelder has a few things to say about this, in a video of hers. She opposes construction of bigger colliders until theory has caught up to make better predictions about the results of such a collider.

@plexiglasscorn

3 жыл бұрын

She also said that colliders keep physicists, well, employed.

@booJay

3 жыл бұрын

I totally get where she's coming from and don't necessarily disagree with her, but excessive amounts of money could be (and are) spent on less worthy endeavors (and people), so I personally wouldn't make a huge fuss over it being used for this.

@mrnarason

3 жыл бұрын

She complains about lack of experiment evidence from theories but doesn't want to or believe in funding more Collider research... Okay

@user-db4dd4ze3n

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine building the collider and them finding nothing new...

@aeroscience9834

3 жыл бұрын

Wow...that’s just not how it works. Not how science is done at all. Who is this person, Aristotle reincarnated?

Hang on, Sabine will be along any minute with a song

@bigmikebeebee

3 жыл бұрын

Please no

I'd like to know more about designing the detection part of previously unseen particles, and how it evolved over time

What you're doing for your patreons supporters are really cool.

CERN invented World Wide Web, I'd say that's enough reason to give them whatever budget they like!

"Which is, for reference, A LOT OF ENERGY" 😂

keep your style of video just like this. no annoying music, just you. no jump cuts its relaxing to watch.

The legacy of the ancestral technique of smashing two things together to see what happens, is still going strong, I see.

Italians physicists be like: "Marcello, can we cook pasta by smashing electrons?"

@MarsJenkar

3 жыл бұрын

@Shane Ashby "Call-a the MythBusters."

@Pandzikizlasu80

3 жыл бұрын

Poles already know that the matter structure is the same as leniwe pierogis* - is made of quarks from pol. twaróg - cottage cheese. Build that thing in Poland and the true pierogis* model will be proven! *The rest of ingredients will be batter, sugar and cinnamon.

@ekay4495

3 жыл бұрын

@@Pandzikizlasu80 You high?

@Pandzikizlasu80

3 жыл бұрын

@@ekay4495 The etymology dictionary says "The word Quark (Late Middle High German: quarc, twarc, zwarg; Lower Saxon: dwarg), with is thought to derive from a West Slavic equivalent, such as Sorbian twarog, Polish twaróg, Czech and Slovak tvaroh." So quark - twaróg - cottage cheese is the main building block of all matter (and a kind of pierogis :P

@DialecticRed

2 жыл бұрын

The italian pysicists are probably also the ones reaponsible for spaghettification, and the different pasta layers of neutron stars

"So the Future Circular Collider won't let me be or let me be me so let me see They tried to shut me down on LHC"

@PetardeWoez

3 жыл бұрын

but it feels so empty without SUSY

@TheInevitableHulk

3 жыл бұрын

nice

4:38 Man I was so amped about the amount of energy in a form of a sick comparison that would follow. Why you had to do me like that?

Very interesting and worthwhile video.

"Signs of SuSy" Sounds like it would be my mom's favorite 90s alternative band

@QlueDuPlessis

3 жыл бұрын

I'd place it closer to the '60s. Susy was a popular song-lyric name in the '50s and '60s.

I always get hit with "spacetime" when I least expect it

Brilliant video! We had a talk from the person who worked on providing the computing power for the LHC, fascinating! The global coordination for this project is unbelievably good.

The Standard Model is for me like the Periodic Table. It is sacred.

The diagram at 4:37 mixes up leptons and quarks (in the legend).

@stevecruickshank5686

3 жыл бұрын

And the "g" should be a gluon, not a photon

I would like to see a video on Wakefield Acceleration, becuase that would be a great way to get higher energy collisions in smaller spaces

@mastershooter64

2 жыл бұрын

imagine a wakefield accelerator that's 100 km long lol we'd definitely be able to detect strings with that much power

Thank you for sharing this video that was very interesting.

2:41 Gerard K. O'Neill rockin' the Spock Hair!

Hey Matt I’m a long time listener and have heard of the possibility of sub-sub atomic particles like preons that potentially fulfill the role of a Dark Matter candidate. Is the any possibility of sub-quark entities?

@NoSubsWithContent

Жыл бұрын

fermi-lab did a couple videos addressing that and determined preons would have to be 10,000 times smaller than a proton or something like that, there is always a possibility of them existing but it's gonna take a lot more energy than what we're producing to find them even if we figure out what they decay into. I'm going to assume it's very close to the energy required to create a blackhole.

When we’re talking about space flowing, is this implying some kind of literal movement of space itself or just describing the paths that particles would follow if encountering that extreme environment?

@powewq1748

3 жыл бұрын

Nooo. Not quite but close.. space time flowing is a phenomenon that describes the low entropy variations that occur naturally within quantum wave theory... i hope this helped

Thanks for that, I completely understand everything now 🧐

As always, great video Professor.

Ah yes, particle accelerators. The intellectual version of “mine is bigger than yours”

Matts tattoo says: "only the god particle will judge me"

@GrimSleepy

3 жыл бұрын

At least it's not a Super Nova, I'd rather he not take the Earth with him. :D

Hey Matt and spacetime team, you are so awesome!

Thank you for the great information.

My notifications: Can Future Colliders Break the Standard Model? Me, without a damn clue what even a future collider is: damn can it??? 🤔

@jessehudgins6066

3 жыл бұрын

Lmao when curiosity takes you to strange places

@sadmanjahed1898

3 жыл бұрын

That's not the main question... The main question is whose future are they gonna collide?

It’s gonna be sad when they build that monster over like 2 decades and when they fire it up, they find absolutely no new breakthroughs as far as any new particles. (Knock on wood)

@krashd

3 жыл бұрын

Sad, but also informative, every result in science teaches us something.

@vibaj16

3 жыл бұрын

Rob Fraser “what information have these 34 collisions shown you?” “We misused our budget”

Good video thanks for posting it

Universes are so smart. As they mature, they produce suitable conditions for sentient beings, capable of producing large particle colliders, to thrive, causing new ”big bangs” to happen and thus completing their reproductive cycle.

Lets build a particle accelerator around the Moon's equator.

@happygimp0

3 жыл бұрын

After that we want one around the earth, then the solar system and in the end one that goes around the milky way.

@hudsoncaceres6820

3 жыл бұрын

ggzh a Argue With Everyone And then we can activate it to destroy the Flood

@gamingcreatesworlddd2425

3 жыл бұрын

@@hudsoncaceres6820 which flood

Maybe instead of a bigger accelerator we should make the smallest possible kugelblitz in space we can, maybe with a similar mechanism (but smaller) that Jeffrey S Lee talked about in his paper Acceleration of a Schwarzschild Kugelblitz Starship.

@SahasaV

3 жыл бұрын

You do know that if we put the current total energy output of humanity into creating one. We would be multiple orders of magnitude short of making one the size of a proton.

@joshuahillerup4290

3 жыл бұрын

@@SahasaV one the size (I'm assuming you're talking about volume and not mass) of a proton is *way* bigger than what would be needed amazing scientific research. Even if it only lasted a milisecond before completely evaporating that evaporation should take long enough to answer all sorts of questions about things like quantum gravity, including confirming (or of course falsifying, which would be even more interesting) Hawking radiation.

@SahasaV

3 жыл бұрын

@@joshuahillerup4290 Again, orders of magnitude smaller, using the entirety of the energy available to our species right now.

With the Large Hadron Collider, I was seeing Luminosity increase exponentially, and also the detection of a particle that came out of the formula of the Collision

nice! We’re going to probe even deeper can’t wait to see what the scientists find

Gonna be telling stories to my grandkids about the Alex S-L-ino.

Could small black hole exploding. Open a bubble in space time anything that could pass through the radiation and get through the bubble would come out at the same time it when it

These crazy machines also serve as inspiration. If you are a kid and you hear oh there is this giant machine to creates collisions and explosions. Maybe that kid starts dreaming about working with that machine and becomes a physicist which in turn later discovers how gravity works or is the chief engineer of the rocket that takes us to visit Saturn. Having something to aspire to can never be underestimated.

Excellent intro. It's 2300hrs and I'm now making eggs.

Wait.. so.. is an omelette made of a billion billion subatomic particle 'eggs' a tiny big omelette, or a huge small omelette? My calorie count quick reference card doesn't seem to cover either...

i like how the Tim Allen approach solves most "unsolvable" things in science. we just need more power, bigger magnets, and better lasers... obviously.

15:06 The Trousers of Time! Sir PTerry would be pleased.

Proton be like "the fcc won't let me be or let me be me so let me see"

Maybe we're at a point where it's more effective to heavily invest in AI over new colliders. It seems weird to me that physics isn't at the forefront of AI research despite generating more data than any other field. Building and understanding an AI that is capable to rediscover the Standard Model (or an alternative) only from currently available experimental data seems like the logical next step for physics and science overall.

@ebob0531

2 жыл бұрын

They are at the forefront of a lot of physics. Just not this sort of physics.

@Thros1

Жыл бұрын

Once they figure out true ai all of our efforts will seem like child's play, if they don't decide we need to go we should be in for a real treat!

BNL is 5 minutes from my home. Probably won't be here in 10+ years, though.

We certainly hope it will! It would be absolutely amazing and revolutionary, every time we pulled back another curtain the benefit to humanity has been impossible to overstate.

The only channel i feel too dumb for, but yet find it incredibly interesting