Can Canon Digital Photo Professional edit Infrared images?
Can Canon Digital Photo Professional 4 be used to edit raw Infrared images? Why would you use DPP instead of another program? How does the image quality compare to Adobe Lightroom Classic or Adobe Camera Raw? What are the pros and cons of DPP? I'll answer these questions in this video.
0:00 intro
0:54 color space
1:21 white balance
3:16 picture style, gamma, advanced
4:31 color adjustment
5:48 color swap
6:22 convert & save
7:04 batch process
7:35 DPP vs LRC
12:05 Summary
Software used: Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.10.20.1
Infrared Book: www.infraredbo...
Lightroom Infrared Color Swap Profiles: 590.red/lr-ir-...
Infrared Profiles, LUTs, & Presets: 590.red/profiles
Infrared Blog: 590.red/blog
Infrared Newsletter: 590.red/news
Infrared Coaching: 590.red/coach
Diffraction Calculator: www.diffractio...
Infrared Lenses: 590.red/lenses
Infrared Editors: 590.red/raw
Email (no attachments): yt@590.mozmail.com
Send images: 590.red/share
Tip Jar: 590.red/tip
Instagram: 590.red/ig
Vero: 590.red/vero
---
Affiliate Links
---
Camera Conversions & Filters
---
Kolari Vision USA and worldwide: 590.red/kv
LifePixel Infrared USA and worldwide: 590.red/lp
Full Spectrum International EU and worldwide: 590.red/fsuk
---
Gear
---
KEH Camera - Used Cameras and Lenses: 590.red/keh
---
Raw Editors
---
ON1 Photo Raw - Get 20% off with code ROBSHEA20 590.red/on1
DxO PhotoLab: 590.red/dxo-ph...
Nik Collection: 590.red/nik
---
#infrared #infraredphotography #infraredcamera
Пікірлер: 10
DPP have a unique feature which may be useful in some situations, it can save in canons raw format, so you can make eg white balance and colour adjustments, save a copy as a .cr2 file, and continue as usual in LR or ACR.
From what I'm seeing, there is literally no reason to use DPP over free editors like Darktable. Darktable (provided you use LUTs for channel swapping and color inversion) has everything you could wish for and more. It has extreme amount of control over what exactly is happening to the RAW file. Most that I've seen in any editor. It even allows you to forego demosaicing all together, which works great for 850nm+ images and gives you better noise performance. As if you were using a bayerless camera.
I only use DPP where I have to; it is too convoluted of a UI to use per se IMNSHO!
I've used DPP, occasionally, over the years to import a raw file, as a TIFF, directly to PS. This technique allows the raw file to load with the characteristics of your camera's JPG settings. Andrew Gibson offers an 80-page eBook titled "Understanding DPP", which I found useful. Rob, could you share the settings of your Canon? I really like your starting point. Thanks for your infrared efforts - always inspiring. Dan
@danyeager7561
Жыл бұрын
Dang, just went to download DPP4, and found it isn't compatible with my old DSLRs (70D, 20D, T5). Thanks, anyway, for the inspiration. Dan
@robshea
Жыл бұрын
This image is from a Canon SL1 590 nm conversion, which I sold. I don't remember the picture settings used.
@danyeager7561
Жыл бұрын
@@robshea Oh, well...thanks for the reply. Nice clean image.
@drhoward53
11 ай бұрын
@@danyeager7561 Perhaps you missed something. DPP 4.17.30 is running just fine with RAW files from my T3i. The A7V is another story though . *grin*
@danyeager7561
11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the encouragement - I did try to download DPP4, and I was refused when I was asked for a serial number. All my cameras are older, and not the latest file type. I'll try again, and see if I can come up with a workaround.@@drhoward53